| Pages: [1] |
1. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Karlemgne And they're changing that so the essence of the ship is an anti-cap dps platform. And that's what this whine thread is about.. Noone can't see where after the last changes the ANTI-Capital role has been squeesed ...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.18 11:31:00
|
2. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Karlemgne What people are suggesting is that you simply lower the barrier of entry to super-caps. Despite what you think 10 billion isk is probably 15x what the average eve player has had in their wallet at the times when th...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.18 02:16:00
|
3. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Karlemgne And why should they only be available to some small portion of the eve player base? Why should it be the case that I'll now have to worry about big 0.0 alliances hot dropping these on low-sec combats? So there i...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.17 10:16:00
|
4. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Drachenlord Seriously... the Cost Reduction is fine... What is so good about cost reduction? Why should the ship be available for everyone? Bassicaly a lot of the unneeded changes and nerfs and rebalances have happene...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.17 00:04:00
|
5. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Sokratesz It appears nozh came in nd ****ed on seleenese parade. http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=author&p=CCP%20Nozh this is the guy who brought us the proposal for a carrier nerf two years ago which resulted in t...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.16 16:49:00
|
6. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: McFly 10.28.2009: CCP Abathur: Supercarriers will not be docking in Dominion. If this ever happens it will be the result of a very expensive infrastructure or outpost upgrade. <----What Happened here? Did Nozh stuff Abat...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.16 16:35:00
|
7. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: The Internets You know what the counter to supercarriers would be? More supercarriers. Normal carriers/dreads get completely annihilated. What is the counter to a single battleship? Moar battleships.. Can apply the same a...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.13 16:12:00
|
8. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: gnome blood If you skip the anti-capital role? Are you serious? CCP decided it¦s the new role for the ship and you conveniently skip it? Yes I'm serious because it bassically does less damage than a regular capital (or yo...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.13 15:45:00
|
9. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: gnome blood EHP and dps has been quadrupled or more from their current stats on the LIVE server. They lost half their dps from the last iteration on the TEST server. They lost DPS (if you skip the anti-capital role) also ...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.13 15:07:00
|
10. Dominion Titan Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
After nearly 30 pages of _feedback_ any statements/announcements from developers?
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.13 14:46:00
|
11. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: gnome blood No matter how you spin this, it¦s a buff to the moms as they are on TQ at the moment. Could you enlighten us where is that buff? The whole problem about this is the 180 degree turns CCP make and not even sti...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.13 14:39:00
|
12. [Petition] Restore Motherships (supercarriers) to previous stats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/signed
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.12 21:28:00
|
13. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I just wonder based on what have theese changes been made? Like have there been any objections from playerbase about the ship class being unbalanced (taking in note the changes innitially given in Dominiona and test days) compared to for example t...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.12 19:20:00
|
14. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: The Mittani Edited by: The Mittani on 12/11/2009 16:17:46 Another seriouspost: What on earth is going on in your dev environment when you assign a team of random devs to re-do the already completed/settled work of a prev...
- by R0ze - at 2009.11.12 19:10:00
|
15. Petition for carriers and moms to stay the way they are. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/signed
- by R0ze - at 2007.10.31 04:35:00
|
16. Capital modules and how bonuses don't work on them... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/signed Just a small small note would help to solve a lot in the module description "It doesnt work on capitals" (just the same as with this Trial account txt) Now all the ISK down the drain..
- by R0ze - at 2007.02.20 23:52:00
|
17. Scanning by pirates in deadspace? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: ian666 Edited by: ian666 on 05/12/2006 17:34:05 I also want Intsa warping BS Come on.. You have now an instant warp (okay ready after few secs) to whatever you want in whatever ship you want (not restricted to gang) :)
- by R0ze - at 2006.12.05 17:40:00
|
18. "All bookmarks within 25km of station will be deleted" - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You can dock instantly and warp to 0km to every station now. No need to have a BM.. Unless maybe in a system full of stations to remember which was the right one (I use then Assets).
- by R0ze - at 2006.12.05 15:24:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |