| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
161. So ... am I the only one ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Honor in eve? Yes, its sort of a silly mechanic. I don't have quotes, but I think someone in CCP might have said they frowned upon it, but who knows. Until they change it, I'd just use/abuse it to its fullest potential.
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.23 07:23:00
|
162. CCP Deals Away With 30 Day Codes: More ISKies out of pocket to play - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nyphur Originally by: Shakuul Shouldn't the tax only be on Value Added...so CCP deducts server expenses and everything before paying the tax (since these are basically inputs that they purchased)? If this is the case...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.23 07:22:00
|
163. EVE: Impossibly Imperfect - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Galan Amarias Well since it looks like it's been a while since you read the tutorial let me assure you that High sec is never called "Safe." merely "safer" and in all mentions of Concord there is an asside teling you they m...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.23 07:16:00
|
164. A compendium of Possible Truths - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sergio Ling Originally by: Nyphur better list than mine mind if I add it to the OP? Also make them nicely formatted like his were...maybe even put them into categories or something if this ever becomes a sti...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.23 01:11:00
|
165. EVE: Impossibly Imperfect - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Players find way to benefit themselves in any game, even in totally PVE games. And even in PVE games, people whine about it. Even if you don't directly damage the other person, the fact that you are better at accomplishing goal XYZ in the game mak...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.23 00:56:00
|
166. isn't bumping to prevent warp anexploit? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gridwalker It was bumping ships out of POS shields which was deemed an exploit. Doing it to prevent warp is merely good tactics. Another great use for it is bumping haulers and/or miners away from their cans to facilitate y...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.23 00:39:00
|
167. CCP Deals Away With 30 Day Codes: More ISKies out of pocket to play - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Imajihad ju They're raising the price of the timecards so that the Europeans can't get around the vat, and if so that if they choose to, they end up giving CCP the same amount of cash. Europeans seem to like forgetting that...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.23 00:37:00
|
168. What did I do wrong when I was trading docked? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Kazzac Elentria Originally by: Sphynx Stormlord It sounds to me that the main problem was only a fraction of your money was working for you at any one time. If you dont diversify enough, and your buy orders take wee...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 22:29:00
|
169. An insurance for those who get suicide ganked. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Easy insurance already available in the game: use a courier mission and put down a large collateral. You get your items (or your money back) moved risk free.
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 22:16:00
|
170. Making money with a freighter. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Damares tbh i dont see much isk in doing courier contracts as their always really low reward, big collateral and often go far, its rare someone pays you fairly. Trading all the way, trade minerals, npc goods and what not, t...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 22:01:00
|
171. CCP Deals Away With 30 Day Codes: More ISKies out of pocket to play - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gabriel Karade Or 3) honest. Dress it up all you want, it's playing the system to avoid VAT, so I don't see how people have a leg to stand on complaining about this loop-hole being closed. CCP isn't closing a VAT loophol...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 21:38:00
|
172. CCP Deals Away With 30 Day Codes: More ISKies out of pocket to play - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gabriel Karade Prices rises that only affect people who are already getting the game for cheap nobhead... Oh and lets just be clear, those playing the GTC game to avoid VAT (tax evasion 4tw eh? ) will still be getting ...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 20:42:00
|
173. CCP Deals Away With 30 Day Codes: More ISKies out of pocket to play - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Daelin Blackleaf We're losing sight of the primary issue here. Simplifying the ETC reseller program does not mean increasing the price. I appreciate honesty, I do not appreciate having a price hike attempt to sneak past me...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 20:34:00
|
174. GTC change is NOT a rip off - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Angela Toren The change was necessary because GTC's are actually loosing CCP money. Let me explain; - The majority of GTC cards are bought with dollars. - The doller is very weak at moment, e.g. it is not worth much agains...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 17:52:00
|
175. Removal of 30 and 90 day ETCs and replacement with 60 day - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
lolwut they're getting rid of 90d? link?
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 15:44:00
|
176. Noobs experance of EVE - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Also, you can serve a valuable role as a tackler/scout. I think you should be able to get into covops in under 2 months, which are quite nice. Then you can move up to stealth bombers and be fairly pvp effective. From then on pick whatever directio...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 08:18:00
|
177. Big isk investments - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Advertising is a really good one. I'm sure tons of people would pay for advertisements on the now basically useless concord billboards, which have shown the same stupid booster PSAs and bounties since nearly the beginning of the game. Maybe you co...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 07:20:00
|
178. Is there a solution for blob warfare that doesn't involve instancing? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Erotic Irony in the Oveur era the speculation was of diminished returns on focus fire, Hammer and Tux didn't like it so I guess Eve is gonna die like shadowbane :[ i didn't intend that to be a suggestion of causation (th...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 07:09:00
|
179. Removable implants and money sinks - a possible solution. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Or they could just change the cooldown on jump clones to 6 hours or something. Even if they don't...if you do pvp mostly on weekends, you have to JC in and out a couple times, so you lose maybe 4 hours of skill training. Boo hoo. JC not in the i...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 07:06:00
|
180. Is there a solution for blob warfare that doesn't involve instancing? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
First, I guess we have to establish the problem(s) with blob warfare: 1) Lag. I think this will always be an issue. If lag for a certain size blob is solved, blobs will only get larger. 2) Combat less interesting (IMO). FC calls primary, target va...
- by Shakuul - at 2008.05.22 07:01:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |