| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 |
10001. Foul Language - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Better foul language than fowl language, amiright? Right? Guys? Right? GuysGǪ? GǪawww.
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 14:12:00
|
10002. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rebecha Pucontis wrote: Here is one tip which I think may come in useful to you and also many new players who are focusing on long term planning. Something to remember about +5 implants is that a full set of +5 implants is the equivalent price ...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 14:01:00
|
10003. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Velicitia wrote: A better example (still horribly flawed) is that 1. US changes driving laws in 2014 that you need a "standard transmission" license if you want to drive a car with standard (manual) transmission. 2. anyone with a current lic...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 13:45:00
|
10004. Save the Minmatars - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Donedy wrote: Well, some of their ships were OP (the old cane particularly) but making all their ships becoming **** compared to other races, is may be not the solution, isnt it? No, and it's not what they're doing either. Minmatar ships wil...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 13:21:00
|
10005. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Royal Executioner Shazih wrote: 1. I myself (actually training it) might get it on time (or even if not be short like 4-5 days). I hope it is clear. But people who just started or will start playing a bit later wont. GǪand that is just the na...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 12:58:00
|
10006. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nathalie LaPorte wrote: I'm sorry, but emulating you and listening to you argue against your own arguments is much superior. Maybe you should try doing that then. It got you nowhere the first time since you failed to pick up on the actual answ...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 04:59:00
|
10007. Discovery Scanner - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
My gut is telling me that all these kinds of questions will have one answer: wait until fanfest for highlights; until the week after for the blogs and/or sisi releases.
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 04:50:00
|
10008. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nathalie LaPorte wrote: Nice combination, the "claim the argument you just responded to 20 times isn't actually a real argument at all" plus the "hereby conclude that I win" plus the "impute negative emotions to the other party". Impressive. G...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 04:38:00
|
10009. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nathalie LaPorte wrote: I'm sorry, but that doesn't follow from my premises either. Good thing that I wasn't talking about them, then. No need to be sorry. Just try harder to grasp the context next time. Also, from your inability to actually...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 04:19:00
|
10010. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nathalie LaPorte wrote: I'm sorry, I'm not willing to try harder to grasp your non sequiturs. Good thing that it wasn't a non sequitur you needed to grasp, then, but a context.
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 04:13:00
|
10011. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nathalie LaPorte wrote: I'm sorry, none of that follows from my premises. Good thing that I wasn't talking about them, then. No need to be sorry. Just try harder to grasp the context next time.
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 04:07:00
|
10012. 'Older' (Physically) Players? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Chylogos wrote: Anyone remember the BBS game Trade Wars: 2002? Ah, the good ol' days... Sure. There's a modern reimplementation of it too GÇö it's called EVE.
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 03:49:00
|
10013. Gatewick departures - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steve Spooner wrote: They can't scram or web you, they can only futile plink away at your flesh and blood with their tiny 9mm rounds while you pop them with your 150mm auto cannons, I suspect that if you pulled an auto-fire version of this ...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 03:22:00
|
10014. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Asmodai Xodai wrote: The 'failure to plan ahead' counter-argument to OP isn't very good. It can easily be defeated by a player who comes to the game after the change, therefore COULDN'T HAVE failed to plan ahead. WeeeellGǪ it works against th...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 03:10:00
|
10015. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
silens vesica wrote: There's nothing to 'refund' - except in a very tiny minority of cases. The only thing that's being done is to allow the players to fly later what they can fly now. No new capabilities, no suddent leaps in competitiveness....
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 02:28:00
|
10016. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nathalie LaPorte wrote: No, your provision of premises is 100% irrelevant. Eh, no. Again, he's asking about my action GÇö my premises matter a whole lot, since those are the ones he's mistreating. Quote: A syllogism is a collection of prem...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 01:19:00
|
10017. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nathalie LaPorte wrote: You don't seem to be aware of this, but supplying quotes from the OP is much more 'actual' than any paraphrase you supply. GǪwhich is why I'm supplying quotes from the poster in question. You don't seem to be aware of ...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 00:22:00
|
10018. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nathalie LaPorte wrote: Let's examine the OP's statements on that issue: No, let's examine the actual line of argumentation instead, since that's all that matters. Again: Me: GÇ£you're already getting a much more optimise skill tree, so you h...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.24 00:02:00
|
10019. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
silens vesica wrote: Jonah Gravenstein wrote: CCP can't patch dumb, lazy or stupid. That's what NCOs are for. I don't think that really qualifies as GÇ£patchingGÇ¥. To me, GÇ£patchingGÇ¥ suggests the bug is being removed. NCOs are more...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.23 23:26:00
|
10020. Summer expansion SP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nathalie LaPorte wrote: This is simple logic. A non sequitur is an argument that does not follow from the premises. From the premises: ' It was bad after' GǪwhich wasn't a premise to begin with. That it was bad before was a conclusion he reac...
- by Tippia - at 2013.04.23 23:08:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |