| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Faction Warfare (0.0 all over again?) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
solution is simple: massive rewards for those who conquer a system and, possibily, some kind of penalty for the militia who loose it. Maybe somethink like very good agents spawning in the conquerable system. Tama for example: whoever holds it ge...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.06.13 11:27:00
|
2. Destroyers for Faction Warfare? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
i took down a ranis in no time with a coercer yesterday 1x offline salvager/ nos/ destabilizer 7x medium pulses (named or t2... t2 is better for scorch option) 1x mwd 1x dcu 1x pds II 2x HS ( t1 ) with a gisti-b mwd, right rigs etc.. well i love...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.06.13 09:32:00
|
3. Need help: two friends trying EVE 11/06 - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
no fear they will not become carebears, i promise. we played toghether CS, DaoC and WoW JUST for pvp and arenas... thx to all for all the replies so far !
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.06.11 09:28:00
|
4. Need help: two friends trying EVE 11/06 - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
yea i was thinking 11/06 but could change it... maybe 15/06 is safer :p
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.06.08 23:29:00
|
5. Need help: two friends trying EVE 11/06 - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
thx for the tips. Fact is they don't know if they want to spend money untile they have tried it out. I'm thinking something like make two tacklers of them with rifters and fly with them for 2 weeks in a dps/sniping destroyer. So thx very much fo...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.06.08 09:53:00
|
6. Need help: two friends trying EVE 11/06 - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Hi all, I've finally convinced two friends of mine to try out eve again (thet didn't like it the first time and at that time we had a very good wow arena rating and were having lots of fun there). Long story short I stayed, they didn't. Now with...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.06.08 07:27:00
|
7. Clear Skies - Go watch it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
second page ? no way !
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.06.07 23:36:00
|
8. Clear Skies - Go watch it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP hire them ! Let's get a petition about it !!! This will peak out the account number !
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.06.02 01:07:00
|
9. Clear Skies - Go watch it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
11/10. "All guns... fire!"
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.06.01 06:40:00
|
10. I Hail EA and FW ! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
FW disengaging MEANS losing. Exaclty how it should be... I so love FW in that it will bring a meaning to roaming, just cause there will be REAL TARGETS to DEFEND/ATTACK. If you want what you came for you have to stay and fight... heavy neuts or ...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.05.23 11:45:00
|
11. More tackling bonuses please ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
now... THAT's nice info. Thx; always nice to learn something.
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.05.19 06:14:00
|
12. More tackling bonuses please ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Wanting basically two ships to really tackle one could be a choice. I respect that if that's what CCP wants. But as the importance of webbing gets nearer and nearer to the importance of disrupting and for the first we have three ships while for o...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.05.18 23:24:00
|
13. More tackling bonuses please ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Just having a discussion here: the point here is that today tackling often means BOTH webbing and disrupting. I see your points are valid. But as speed gets more and more powerful the importance of a ship being slowed down is getting near to the ...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.05.18 18:28:00
|
14. More tackling bonuses please ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
It's not just about NANOS... it's about tackling. The dedicated Tackling ships should be able to play their role against every ship that is not specifically built to be difficult to tackled (other ceptors,bombers, cov ops). This is not the case:...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.05.18 12:58:00
|
15. More tackling bonuses please ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
nice argument there.
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.05.18 05:37:00
|
16. More tackling bonuses please ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
this is not JUST about nanoships and tackling. This is about tackling in general: if a ship designed for one single role can't handle that single role without being suicidal something is not working, ESPECIALLY if it's a really important one like...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.05.18 04:39:00
|
17. More tackling bonuses please ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Nowadays the tacklers are BAD because most of the time if you need a tackler you need it to web the target too... and to do that he must give up its defence: Speed; just because he will get webbed back and shot at. That's why inties are no good i...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.05.17 18:58:00
|
18. To Snake or not to snake - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ok then can say alltoghether: if you want nano but can't afford snakes, go minnie ? That puts away a dream of fast pew pewing lasers and khanid beauties
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.05.14 10:11:00
|
19. To Snake or not to snake - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Thx for the reply, yea i can already pilot crows and raptors but I really don't like the low dps so I'm switching to a ranis or a crusader. The fact I would like to clarify is: I have not the slightest intention of buying snakes! Not now, not tom...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.05.14 09:26:00
|
20. To Snake or not to snake - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ok, thx for the replies... so which ship you consider to be a good start off ? ( once the skills are set of course). I was thinking to going the amar nano line since it seems to be the most offering at the moment, having 3 wonderful ships ( aye a...
- by Tyrunedeth - at 2008.05.13 18:09:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |