| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] 200 |
1981. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Despite the general forum hurly-burly the reality is that the goonswarm rank and file is not the goonswarm leadership. I can quite imagine the common goons quite enjoying the wardecs - but the planners and leadership se...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 19:22:00
|
1982. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: i cannot believe how much stock people are seriously putting into highsec wars this is amazing it's like you're playing a completely separate, sh ittier game than the rest of us Don't w...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 18:52:00
|
1983. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Khanh'rhh wrote: The CFC's casus beli is your bad posting, and they should be free to wardec you forever and a day at whatever cost it incurs on them, if they wish to. Right, of course you also believe they should...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 18:43:00
|
1984. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lord Helghast wrote: no new mods :( was so looking forward to seeing the extreme rigs for frigates, or the micro jump drive get introduced, 1.1 seems a bit lackluster :(, i mean the v3 is pretty but :( still a sad panda Well, we're still wait...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 17:28:00
|
1985. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: I think you disapproved of the possibility that the wardec might actually have hurt you. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahaha that was a good one i'm glad even enemies like us can toss jokes around
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 16:43:00
|
1986. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
As a highsec coward who wants to hire as many useless corporations as i can find to swell my ranks and is completely unaware the ally system is intended to promote skilled mercs who you hire rather than just being used to evade the wardec cost at ...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 16:35:00
|
1987. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Weaselior wrote: our wardec ain't never gonna drop jade, even when you give up and offer surrender terms Of course not, now its impossible to match your numbers via the ally system you will never have any reason to...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 16:33:00
|
1988. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
but you know when i find an exploit and post it all over eve-o i tend to expect it to get fixed rather than thinking it's a conspiracy when it does
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 16:33:00
|
1989. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Salpun wrote: Weaselior wrote: When you say "re-designed caldari drake" do you mean the model, or you're going to be tweaking ship stats? lol the old missle launchers are gone. Come join us on Sisi and see for your self that's sort of h...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 16:11:00
|
1990. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
When you say "re-designed caldari drake" do you mean the model, or you're going to be tweaking ship stats?
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 16:04:00
|
1991. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
that said we fuckin loved being able to shoot all of the detrius of eve you were able to sweep into the wardec , please continue posting yard-long screeds about it in the sisi thread
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 16:00:00
|
1992. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
our wardec ain't never gonna drop jade, even when you give up and offer surrender terms
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 15:57:00
|
1993. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
*posts a way to exploit game mechanics on eve-o* *those get patched* *is suprised*
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 15:52:00
|
1994. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Goliath wrote: GÇó Adding some new items to FW LP stores GÇó Removing EWAR from all FW NPCs Isn't speedtanking FW complexes a huge issue? Shouldn't you be adding webs or something else to fix that inbalance (this is, apparently, complete...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 15:48:00
|
1995. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: CCP Goliath wrote: Guys, before this goes on any further, kindly take off the hats and get real - we do not develop with one corp or alliance in mind... Seriously Goliath. This does look exactly like a change to s...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 15:37:00
|
1996. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
aww man now we won't be at war with every highsec shitlord in eve
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 15:35:00
|
1997. What would happen if goo-containing moons were shuffled monthly? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
SmilingVagrant wrote: Weaselior wrote: Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Marlona Sky wrote: You assume moon probing would stay the same crap mechanic it is now. Since the OP didn't suggest anything about changing moon probing in his original...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.08 03:35:00
|
1998. What would happen if goo-containing moons were shuffled monthly? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Marlona Sky wrote: You assume moon probing would stay the same crap mechanic it is now. Since the OP didn't suggest anything about changing moon probing in his original proposition, or followup replies - his propo...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.08 03:24:00
|
1999. What would happen if goo-containing moons were shuffled monthly? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tobiaz wrote: I don't know. If you look for changes on the maps where the Tech moons are, it are mostly just some minor alliances being pushed around and some skirmishing by the bigger coalitions, but not many major changes over the years. An...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.08 00:25:00
|
2000. We Aren't Trying Hard Enough - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Greyscale Dash wrote: Time to step up the ganking. This is a good idea, we'll take it under advisement.
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.08 00:24:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |