| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1961. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Petrus Blackshell wrote: Oh, my bad, the problem is that Goons wardecced -SF- and are now swarmed by flashy reds. /s Explain the problem as you understand it, then. I have been known to be wrong. The problem is that the current system makes...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.13 00:22:00
|
1962. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: jade reminder we're still waiting for your explanation of what on earth we (goonswarm leadership) would have to fear from you you made this assertion then got all quiet-like when mocked on it and people demanded you explain ...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.13 00:19:00
|
1963. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Petrus Blackshell wrote: The problem that CSM and CCP are trying to fix is another one: in comparably sized wars, the defender has an enormous advantage by being able to hire infinite allies for free. That then again turns into one side being h...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.13 00:17:00
|
1964. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Brunaburh wrote: It's interesting that the one CSM member who is against the change is the one who is negatively impacted by it. Guess that means the CSM DOES lobby for their own personal game, not for the good of the game as a whole. To be...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.13 00:12:00
|
1965. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Not to interrupt Jade's fifteenth page of "**** the mercs only care about me", have the new FW LP store items been listed?
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.12 18:32:00
|
1966. I Quit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
gank some miners and your interest will be piqued again
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.12 01:31:00
|
1967. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
ganked? by wardecs? while flying with a gsf ticker? how on earth did this happen?
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.12 00:51:00
|
1968. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Kyle Myr wrote: Post that idiot's freighter mail, I need a good laugh. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=13610769 "hmm de dum just going to toodle around in my 7b ship with 1.6b in cargo, in highsec"
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.12 00:48:00
|
1969. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
also lawl "we're winning the isk war!!!!" *hides in stations*
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 22:17:00
|
1970. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jade Constantine wrote: Well heh, they declared war - started losing 10b to 1b and now need the wardec changes to get them out of the mess. There will obviously be some tears and footstamping and the forum trolling squad will try to cover the ...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 22:16:00
|
1971. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Sweet'n Sassy wrote: Yet I would also agree that with all the Goon posting going on in this thread , clearly the idea of a huge war dec has caused many goon members excessive stress in their lives.... The crying here is a virtual cornucopia !...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 22:06:00
|
1972. Destruction Testing the New Wardec System (Ganks Included) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
jade reminder we're still waiting for your explanation of what on earth we (goonswarm leadership) would have to fear from you you made this assertion then got all quiet-like when mocked on it and people demanded you explain
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 22:05:00
|
1973. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Mechael wrote: Weaselior wrote: Well, you're still stuck hoping they actually do anything instead of issue a wardec and then just ignore the corp. True, but that's why we can look up a corp's war history now, isn't it? have you consid...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 21:28:00
|
1974. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Well, you're still stuck hoping they actually do anything instead of issue a wardec and then just ignore the corp.
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 21:25:00
|
1975. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Mechael wrote: I'm curious, why was it determined that only defenders could bring in mercs, sorry, "allies" (don't we already have alliances?) in the first place? Why not allow anyone, attacker or aggressor, to bring in as many mercs as they ca...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 21:19:00
|
1976. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
jade needs everyone he can get because he is terrified its as simple as that any amount of goons will beat him so he needs as much cannon fodder and chaff as he can find
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 21:05:00
|
1977. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Seleene wrote: Weaselior wrote: You are not familiar with Jade, I see. Not a customer, back in the day? OFC I am. I'm just mad posting a bit. I thought that's what this thread was about? Did I make error?! you were a customer? not su...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 20:27:00
|
1978. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Seleene wrote: It's just too dumb; I refuse to believe that you believe this stuff, Jade. The more you rabble about it along those lines, the less attention anyone is going to pay to you. Stick to talking about the actual mechanics and stop th...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 20:14:00
|
1979. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: what exactly does goonswarm have to lose by being in a highsec war with anyone answer: nothing, because we've been using neutral alts in empire since 2006 dont give away our secrets!
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 19:29:00
|
1980. Sticky:Inferno 1.1 Sisi features - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Tithi wrote: What doesn't make sense about this argument? "The Goonswarm CSM plants have no idea what their constituents want and they are using their influence to change game mechanics in ways that their alliance players won't actually like,...
- by Weaselior - at 2012.06.11 19:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |