| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
21. Alliance Tournament VI: Competitors List! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: DHB WildCat LOL 80 percent of 0.0 alliances arent represneted 8). However Good luck to everyone .... Go IDLE Empire!!!!! WildCat I always thought the limited signup thing is a joke, there should be some kind of open...
- by csebal - at 2009.01.16 12:33:00
|
22. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Pilk Also, genuine game mechanics question--does an ECM burst break a lock that's not yet formed? In other words, if it takes me four seconds to lock you, if I'm two seconds into locking you, and you successfully jam me wit...
- by csebal - at 2009.01.14 12:30:00
|
23. Alliance tournament : team listing. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Charlie Luciano Oh and did I mention dTja vu btw? Didn't we also have people from non-participating alliances state that last years tournament would be crap without all the big alliances in? Didn't we have several big allia...
- by csebal - at 2009.01.14 12:13:00
|
24. [Proposal] Ship-based Habitats - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: csebal on 06/01/2009 13:43:11 No. The can of worms this one would open has too many worms to even count. Plus i dont even see where the point is to make a mini POShy thingy, when most (if not all) of what you wrote as the purposes ...
- by csebal - at 2009.01.06 13:43:00
|
25. [Issue] Bookmark my ship - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
This is a really minor request, but it would be great if CSM could pick it up with other UI changes like they did last time, so here it is: You can rightclick / bookmark almost any object in space. Unfortunately, your own ship is one of the exce...
- by csebal - at 2008.12.04 23:27:00
|
26. Alliance Tournament VI: Official Rules Thread - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I think the last tournament did strike a pretty good balance between tanking and ganking.. sure in the early matches you see lots of copycat tactics resulting in boring fights where one brings a setup that can't beat the other and they just sit th...
- by csebal - at 2008.11.28 22:12:00
|
27. [2nd CSM candidate] Tusko Hopkins - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Tusko for president. Well.. maybe not for president, but he would make a fine CSM candidate nonetheless. My opinion of him as a corpmate and RL friend is hardly unbiased.. :) So i simply urge you to look up what he has done in the past, what he...
- by csebal - at 2008.11.04 17:44:00
|
28. New Dev Blog: Serious Security - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Cadde Finally, EXPAND 0.0 space. Actually, remove some highsec/lowsec empire and turn it into less secure space. And make small islands of high sec surrounded by lowsec, all in line with the turmoil caused by the faction wa...
- by csebal - at 2008.08.09 10:40:00
|
29. New Dev Blog: Serious Security - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Finedele so, shooting a hauler is pvp? oh my ****in god, seriously, THIS is not pvp. that is taking a babies lolly away. Actually.. yes.. shooting a hauler is PvP. Just as much as undercutting someone on the market, that...
- by csebal - at 2008.08.08 11:13:00
|
30. New Dev Blog: Serious Security - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Moraguth Originally by: namesarehard I'm just gonna come out and say whats on everyone elses mind here. It is a lot more fun to ruin a carebears gameplay experience and drive him to quit the game then it is to shoot...
- by csebal - at 2008.08.08 10:21:00
|
31. Since you are changing PVP, Lets change missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Andrue Edited by: Andrue on 08/08/2008 09:31:48 What so many of these bullies don't understand or can't accept is that the high-sec residents (ie;those that choose to live there rather than just being fund providers for ...
- by csebal - at 2008.08.08 09:47:00
|
32. Since you are changing PVP, Lets change missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ideally i think it should look like this: high sec - least risk, least reward: 1-4/10 income. (mostly low end mining and lv1-lv3 agents) low sec - high risk, more reward: 5-8/10 income. (mining, exploration, rats and lv4 agents) zero sec - variab...
- by csebal - at 2008.08.08 09:32:00
|
33. Since you are changing PVP, Lets change missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: TrulyKosh Originally by: Havohej Originally by: Pithecanthropus How much isk are these missioners making? More than carebears ratting in 0.0? I doubt it. These missioners put in time... in return they make i...
- by csebal - at 2008.08.08 09:26:00
|
34. Since you are changing PVP, Lets change missions. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: csebal on 08/08/2008 09:13:12 Originally by: Joey Meow Now, as far as your proposal to remove L4 agents from High Security - this will never happen, CCP is here to make money, and forcing those who do not wish to PVP into c...
- by csebal - at 2008.08.08 09:13:00
|
35. New Dev Blog: Serious Security - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Ancy Denaries You completely missed the point. These changes are NOT to remove high sec ganking. If CCP did that, I'd probably be heading for the door already, because that would the dumbest change ever. These changes are t...
- by csebal - at 2008.08.08 08:51:00
|
36. New Dev Blog: Serious Security - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Marlona Sky More suicide ganker emo rage quit tears please. EVE is a cruel and harsh place and you just lost your ISK button. Grow up! The point of your post is.. what exactly? This isnt just about suicide ganking. T...
- by csebal - at 2008.08.07 13:38:00
|
37. New Dev Blog: Serious Security - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Huan CK LOL at all those suicide gank whiners. Why are you opposed to the changes, they only make sense, and you know so very well. RL-Example: If you're committing a crime, then use your car to escape, ignore the law and g...
- by csebal - at 2008.08.07 12:10:00
|
38. New Dev Blog: Serious Security - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
From on side, im happy as i will be able to haul billions around (again) without worrying about getting my stuff blown up. On the other side however, i think someone should seriously be fired from the CCP design team. Whoever came up with these i...
- by csebal - at 2008.08.07 11:05:00
|
39. CSM - CCP Meeting 001 - 0016 Switching ammo for all weapons at once - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Well, its freightening how unimaginative CCP is. You tell them "change all" and whats their first idea? Do it really all at once. Hell noone said that. People merely want to save themselves the chore of having to click through each turred and se...
- by csebal - at 2008.07.18 15:32:00
|
40. CSM - CCP Meeting 001 - 0008 Cargo Hold size of ships in Hangar - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Cloaks already have the "drawbacks still active while module offline" feature, AFAIK. Is there a good reason why this couldn't be expanded to include the modifiers cargo expanders grant too ? Seriously, this is ...
- by csebal - at 2008.07.18 15:20:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |