Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 |
81. RE: Whaaa, failure cascade baaaaaaaaaa! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: teji on 07/01/2009 21:03:45 Avon please go back to selling cosmetics door to door. You aren't very good at this whole forum posting thing.
- by teji - at 2009.01.07 21:02:00
|
82. Starbase exploit addressed - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: XxHey BabyxX Originally by: killerco Names please ccp Names!!!!! EVOKE/MOSTLY HARMLESS Band of Brothers/EXE
- by teji - at 2008.12.11 16:42:00
|
83. The enemy of my enemy is my friedn; The world is upside down. - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Vultur3 I dont think I went on about it for 10 minutes. And they havent joined the GBC; AAA has not set the GBC blue, nor is the GBC involved. -A- Is in the GBC now. Welcome your new BoB overlords.
- by teji - at 2008.11.21 23:48:00
|
84. AAA vs Goons - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: IllCapitan Well you still have half of eve blue no? Look how dumb you are.
- by teji - at 2008.11.13 23:33:00
|
85. RA vs Goons - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
This thread does not deliver. Drama Drought.
- by teji - at 2008.11.05 22:19:00
|
86. CCP Zulupark answers your every question! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: teji on 24/10/2008 17:22:36 Why do NPC regions have effective -1.0 truesec when they are easier to hold/less risk than conq regions. Also why do hybrid regions retain the -1.0 truesec throughout the conquerable part of the region? ...
- by teji - at 2008.10.24 17:21:00
|
87. Titans - Whats the game going to be like in 12m? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: 4 titans DD'd a fleet and completely killed it. With every alliance with space gaining titans every month. I mean in several months there's going to be over 100 probably. Hey guys welcome to 9ish months ago. Back then it was L2P a...
- by teji - at 2008.10.24 15:36:00
|
88. Lag makes Faction Warfare unplayable - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Welcome to 0.0 combat. Be happy that you don't have titans in FW.
- by teji - at 2008.09.04 20:00:00
|
89. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dirk Magnum Okay fine. Chribba had the endorsement of CCP for those ships, but not the "right". Whatever. The fact that they decide to move them now , without any notification and apparently without any reason, is the silly...
- by teji - at 2008.08.27 16:48:00
|
90. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Daan Sai Originally by: Traidor Disloyal Does Cribba have a piece of paper issued by CCP that says he has a right to have a cap ship in High Sec. Effectively yes, he and all the high sec cap owners did, there ...
- by teji - at 2008.08.27 16:41:00
|
91. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Captain Richthofen Come on ccp what in the world were you thinking? The speed nerf I can handle even though I may not like it. But this is to much Chribba has every right to have a cap ship in high sec. This is just moronic ...
- by teji - at 2008.08.27 16:23:00
|
92. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Trilli Shaw The advantages of this nerf: zero The disadvantages of this nerf: lots of upset players, especially vets Grats ... not Advantages: Internet celebrity complaining about losing his special privilege. Disadvant...
- by teji - at 2008.08.27 16:07:00
|
93. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: teji on 27/08/2008 15:57:12 Originally by: Semkhet Here you go: your EvE without vets. And without T2 stuff, and without caps, and without POS'es, and without everything which needs more than simple minerals to be built, etc...
- by teji - at 2008.08.27 15:56:00
|
94. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Smagd See the happy vendor in this very thread stating he was glad he sold it two weeks ago. That would imply that I read this terrible thread except for the op and a few posts at the end.
- by teji - at 2008.08.27 15:41:00
|
95. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Thargat The capitals in hi-sec were nothing else than a inspiring oddity Huh? How can you aspire to something that you can never obtain? Your logic is faulty.
- by teji - at 2008.08.27 15:33:00
|
96. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Traidor Disloyal I got to agree. This would be more fun then watching the implosion of SWG (NGE) and AoC (at release)at the same time. Crushing the ego of one internet celebrity vs broad (admittedly bad) sweeping changes...
- by teji - at 2008.08.27 15:21:00
|
97. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is awesome, next up t2 bpos.
- by teji - at 2008.08.27 15:08:00
|
98. [issue] T2 BPOs, possible "producing out" and random redistribution - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Matalino How about all those who want T2 BPO's removed from the game, chip in and buy out those BPO's from their current owners. I would only chip in isk if it allowed me to ban people like you from the game.
- by teji - at 2008.08.13 22:44:00
|
99. [issue] Moon mining, possible "mining out" and random redistribution - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: teji on 13/08/2008 16:54:01 Originally by: Grim Mercy What about some sort of system that encourages maintenance of conquered space? It would make 0.0 more of a "new frontier" where new entities could compete, rather than "J...
- by teji - at 2008.08.13 16:53:00
|
100. [issue] Moon mining, possible "mining out" and random redistribution - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Make no mistake. Static moon mining is one of the FEW things that encourages combat in 0.0 at this point. Arguing anything else is delusional.
- by teji - at 2008.08.13 16:40:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |