Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 62 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
KanpaJl
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 19:59:00 -
[1321]
/signed
|
Lucas Tigh
United Systems Navy Zenith Affinity
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 20:22:00 -
[1322]
Edited by: Lucas Tigh on 02/09/2009 20:22:14
Originally by: Falaricae The cooldown needs to be lower and the text needs to go. When your fixes start to criple legitimate gameplay, you aren't doing it right.
And while you're at it, the whole notification system needs updating. One box doesn't do much good when twenty things are happening at once.
Edit: page 45 sniper -------------------------------------
CCP, make me a winner.
I win. |
Olly Busse
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 20:34:00 -
[1323]
2s delay sux.
make it 0.5 at least.
|
Hoo Is
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 20:36:00 -
[1324]
Originally by: Olly Busse 2s delay sux.
make it 10 at least.
Fixed that for you
Less scans = less server stress = less lag
What is it that everyone always says around here:
ADAPT OR DIE ---- a reply which adds nothing to a thread or results in a thread being bumped with no new discussion worthy content is considered spam and as such warrants a forum ban |
Bfoster
The Python Cartel.
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 21:23:00 -
[1325]
Supported! ------------
My Killboard- The Python Cartel |
Foxtrot Darius
tr0pa de elite Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 21:26:00 -
[1326]
/signed !
|
WarGod
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 22:36:00 -
[1327]
Edited by: WarGod on 02/09/2009 22:38:27
Originally by: Hoo Is
Originally by: Olly Busse 2s delay sux.
make it 10 at least.
Fixed that for you
Less scans = less server stress = less lag
What is it that everyone always says around here:
ADAPT OR DIE
When trying to free up a very small % of the server at the cost of compromising gameplay (including but not restricted to the new fail scanner) it will annoy a lot of people.
And a few things to think about. 1 being the change annoyed 90% of eve (bar the ret-rded people who just wish they could live in a box and rat all day in 0.0) and we have gained something unnoticeable to the players it has affected. That something is an extra 0.0000000001% server efficiency or w/e. I THINK i can speak people for everyone (bar ret-rds like yourself) when i say I'd rather that 0.0000001% of lag for the REAL SUPER scanner back.
If you're getting killed all the time because you're a moron and can't make money go eBay.
If CCP want to make a real change to the server they should do it without compromising pvp (i don't have the solution in my hat) wheres this super computer that will 'KILL ALL LAG' I've heard about so long ago etc.
(P.S. I do not support nor am i involved in any form of isk selling.)
|
Gneeznow
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 05:49:00 -
[1328]
sucky game mechanic
|
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 06:05:00 -
[1329]
Originally by: Hoo Is
Less scans = less server stress = less lag
What is it that everyone always says around here:
ADAPT OR DIE
Yes, when there are things you can do to the same effect. Take my issue for an example. You try to hunt a ratter in an empty system. The moment you jump into the system you have a few seconds to locate him before he is safe from aggression. Even then he will very likely escape, if he pays attention. It was already very hard to catch him. As a forum ***** you notice the lack of any whines about how overpowered the scanner was. I for one can't think of a single one.
Please tell me how to adapt? I can't train a skill to do it faster. I can't use a different fitting or a ship, since they are all equally bad. No implants or rigs will help me. The only thing that I could do was to try and learn to how to scan the target down faster by training my real life skills. CCP has now put a hardcap on this, that I have no way of compensating for. The competition between target and prey was between time and it favored the prey already. CCP just decided it wasn't easy enough for them and didn't allow other ways of achieving the same result, so there isn't a way to adapt to the change.
The only option is to have them change it to something more reasonable, so it doesn't affect gameplay so much, but still prevents constant spam of the scanner. This thread is full of acceptable compromises.
|
Super Twinkey69
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 07:17:00 -
[1330]
signed sort your ****n lives out ccp be4 we **** your face
stop makn stupid changes to benefit some useless whineing bears that are too **** to warp out of a belt after hostiles come into system,how bout you like idk think about the other 90% of your player base taht actually puts the scanner to good use
useless ccp and their useless ideas are USELESS
|
|
Polar Raven
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 08:27:00 -
[1331]
/ signed!
|
Khaarj Nihir
Caldari Hikage Corporation
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 08:43:00 -
[1332]
at least reduce it...
/signed
|
Ayato kun
Les chevaliers de l'ordre
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 09:58:00 -
[1333]
Edited by: Ayato kun on 03/09/2009 10:04:41 /signed, of course...
|
Angelo Rosso
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 10:02:00 -
[1334]
\signed
|
Lameh Dba
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 10:03:00 -
[1335]
If you don't like something change it; if you can't change it, change the way you think about it.á ~Mary Engelbreit
|
Rabanne
Les chevaliers de l'ordre
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 10:06:00 -
[1336]
/signed |
Suitonia
Gallente Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 10:18:00 -
[1337]
Edited by: Suitonia on 03/09/2009 10:18:34
Originally by: Hoo Is
Originally by: Olly Busse 2s delay sux.
make it 10 at least.
Fixed that for you
Less scans = less server stress = less lag
What is it that everyone always says around here:
ADAPT OR DIE
NPCs should have a 5% chance of one hit KOing a Drake.
Reduces lag because less wrecks are generated when the Drake is dead
ADAPT OR DIE.
^^ Holds about as much merit as your argument. --- Please resize your signature to the maximum allowed of 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum file size of 24000 bytes. Zymurgist |
Lofe sXe
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 10:56:00 -
[1338]
Edited by: Lofe sXe on 03/09/2009 10:57:30 signed - this scan thing is totally dumb
|
Drichter
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 11:28:00 -
[1339]
Originally by: Hoo Is
Originally by: Olly Busse 2s delay sux.
make it 10 at least.
Fixed that for you
Less scans = less server stress = less lag
What is it that everyone always says around here: ADAPT OR DIE
Let's take away one slot of high, medium and low on every ship.
Less modules = less server stress = less lag
Or even better ... get rid of that third dimension ... we're fighting off the overview already anyway and most systems are quiet flat already, let's get back to something like this. THAT could really help with the lag.
|
Nyveg
Hyperborea Re
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 12:07:00 -
[1340]
Originally by: Drichter Let's take away one slot of high, medium and low on every ship.
Less modules = less server stress = less lag
Or even better ... get rid of that third dimension ... we're fighting off the overview already anyway and most systems are quiet flat already, let's get back to something like this. THAT could really help with the lag.
See a Tempest owning 2 Ravens? I want Rorschach 2D back!
|
|
Danthomir
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 12:56:00 -
[1341]
Classic, if regrettable, example of a large company being unable to keep touch with the entire scope of its' product.
Whoever made the change wasn't familiar with the roles the scanner played. Sucks, because now the game suffers for it.
|
Arcturus Io
Shade. Cry Havoc.
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 12:56:00 -
[1342]
All accounts going inactive in a few days, I honestly cant think of any reason to resub. I have loved and defended this wonderful game for roughly four years, I now have trouble seeing any reason to keep playing.
From the beggining my main character has specialised in all things small, fast and cloaky. This required lots of SP and plenty of actual player skill to pull off well.
*Bang - The nano nerf hit and at first I hated it, then i adapted. I still dont like it but I suppose it makes some small sense in a game balance perspective.
This made small gang pvp mutch harder and instead you had to rely more on evading from the beggining rather than running.
*Bang - All cruiser sized ships were made to warp slower thus making them easier to catch while trying to evade.
At first I hated it, then i adapted. I still dont like it but i suppose it makes some small sense in a game balance perspective.
So if you want to fight in cruisers, the only way to do it is with logistics. If you still want to try and go solo you have to take a native cloaker.
*Bang - All native cloakers have a massive cloak delay after jumping, you cannot pulse your MWD and cloak to get back to the gate if you happen to run into anything above a tiny bubble camp. Thus negating the entire point of native cloakers as _**COVERT OPS**_ or _**RECON**_ ships.
At first I hated it, then i adapt... oh wait... they rolled that one back due to stupidity.
So all is happy in the world of the small gang pvp'er, well, youve poured sour milk over everything I like but meh. I still defend you EVE online because I love you. In the end I know you only want whats best for me... me and all the ravens and drakes in Motsu.
*BANG - After all the mechanics set into motion to make it almost impossible to roam in a small gang CCP in their infinate wizdom also make it near damn impossible to find anyone in a system in any reasonable amount of time.
NO.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
I'm tired of defending you Eve online. I'm tired because the game I have loved for all these years has turned out to be something I dont play anymore. All I ever do is log on and try to justify why you hate me and others like me so mutch.
QQ - Its been fun.
|
Captain Longshlong
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 12:56:00 -
[1343]
why? |
Zeiris
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 12:58:00 -
[1344]
Wow, sucks to be that guy. ^
Definitely a case of certain decision makers being unfamiliar with the full spread of play styles that make EVE what it is. I know most people never leave their mission-raven or drake, but what about those that do? :\ |
Commander KroMm
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 13:01:00 -
[1345]
I didn't want to catch people in belts anyway~ |
Zlatina
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 13:02:00 -
[1346]
Stupid. If your goal is to make computers ineffective, why are you punishing players? |
Ymrir
Cog Ex Machina
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 13:03:00 -
[1347]
Someone made a pretty bad decision. |
Vrikshaka
Yawn Corp
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 13:03:00 -
[1348]
Saving up on cpu use in order to reduce lag is a honourable thing to be sure, but this was not the right way to do it.
OP supported.
|
Auri Hella
Downwind Trading Guild
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 13:20:00 -
[1349]
This was a really stupid change, kindly revert to the old system.
|
Taguchi Hiroko
tr0pa de elite Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 13:45:00 -
[1350]
/signed
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 62 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |