Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 .. 11 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |

Gatosai
Kaotic Intentions Cold Hand of Shadow
5
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:10:00 -
[271] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Morganta wrote:I never finished SOE, does that make me a rookie if I go do it now?
does the GM and CCP realize that the only thing left in eve worth doing anymore is tear harvesting?
does CCP and the GM not see that that would indicate a huge failure of their game when players would rather **** people off than do one of several legitimate in-game activities?
does this not speak volumes to you guys? No, it just says something about the mentality of the players. Throwing that responsibility on to CCP's shoulders is akin to a rapist blaming their actions on the woman for the way she dresses.
so i kill hulks because of their low cut blouses? |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:11:00 -
[272] - Quote
Gatosai wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Morganta wrote:I never finished SOE, does that make me a rookie if I go do it now?
does the GM and CCP realize that the only thing left in eve worth doing anymore is tear harvesting?
does CCP and the GM not see that that would indicate a huge failure of their game when players would rather **** people off than do one of several legitimate in-game activities?
does this not speak volumes to you guys? No, it just says something about the mentality of the players. Throwing that responsibility on to CCP's shoulders is akin to a rapist blaming their actions on the woman for the way she dresses. so i kill hulks because of their low cut blouses?
Probably the way they wiggle their mining lasers. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
1422
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:11:00 -
[273] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Morganta wrote:I never finished SOE, does that make me a rookie if I go do it now?
does the GM and CCP realize that the only thing left in eve worth doing anymore is tear harvesting?
does CCP and the GM not see that that would indicate a huge failure of their game when players would rather **** people off than do one of several legitimate in-game activities?
does this not speak volumes to you guys? No, it just says something about the mentality of the players. Throwing that responsibility on to CCP's shoulders is akin to a rapist blaming their actions on the woman for the way she dresses.
huh?
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:16:00 -
[274] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Morganta wrote:I never finished SOE, does that make me a rookie if I go do it now?
does the GM and CCP realize that the only thing left in eve worth doing anymore is tear harvesting?
does CCP and the GM not see that that would indicate a huge failure of their game when players would rather **** people off than do one of several legitimate in-game activities?
does this not speak volumes to you guys? No, it just says something about the mentality of the players. Throwing that responsibility on to CCP's shoulders is akin to a rapist blaming their actions on the woman for the way she dresses. huh?
Oh dear lord, I'll explain in crayon.
There are plenty of other things people can do in game. Saying that people gank rookies due to a lack of content or because CCP have somehow failed with EVE is so mind bogglingly stupid I am surprised that the internet even allowed it to be posted.
People gank rookies because they are sad little bastards. It is their mindset to automatically go for the weakest and the youngest targets, mostly because rookies are almost entirely incapable of knowing how or when to fight back. Hence my previous post.
Blame the mentality of the player for their actions, not CCP.
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Gatosai
Kaotic Intentions Cold Hand of Shadow
5
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:25:00 -
[275] - Quote
What it really comes down to in my eyes is that any game with a pvp element is going to have people trying to force their way to play on others. really just got to chalk it up to human condition; in an environment in which you can test your combat skill against other pilots people are going to find enjoyment out of causing others grief. I have killed more then my share of rookies being maybe weeks old but i don't by any means actively hunt for them. rookies will see someone come into their missions and take their loot from there several things can happen: 1) the rookie can freak out about not being able to complete said mission or 2) the rookie thinks he's bad ass and tries to fight in a scenario in which they aren't apt in. the end result is the same the rookie is upset they lost a ship, that doesn't mean we should undoubtedly protect them. i mean all of us veteran players were rookies at some point or another and have had that happen to us and we accept it cause IT'S A SAND BOX GAME. if rookies are that upset about loosing ships that ccp feels the need to protect them then maybe give these "rookies" special insurance options or something because otherwise making extended ruling is taking away the freedom in which we love about this game |

Possum's Awesome
Foxtrot Uniform Charlie Kilo
18
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:28:00 -
[276] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:People gank rookies because they are sad little bastards. It is their mindset to automatically go for the weakest and the youngest targets, mostly because rookies are almost entirely incapable of knowing how or when to fight back.
Another sad carebear projecting his own thought process on other players.
This game, ultimately, is about one player blowing up* (teehee) another PERIOD, DOT, End of Sentence.
All those rookie poppers are doing is introducing them to the cold hard truth of EVE. They're trying right from the start to filter out the whiney little anti-pvp kids from those that can understand what this game is about right from day one.
Aura tells rookies what to expect from this game, if they ignore that lovely voice, they do so at their own peril.
There's a rookie channel for those newbies, there's Aura, there's the forums, there's thousands of newbie articles. Countless resources for those new guys to go to, to figure out what's happened and how to stop it.
You, sir, are a doodyhead. Poopbreath. Possum's Awesome : Awesome Possum
Unjustly accused and condemned for his crimes. |

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
219
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:37:00 -
[277] - Quote
Lady Ayeipsia wrote:How about this... Don't harass the noobs doing the sister's of eve epic, grow a set, and fight people who can and will fight back? Imagine a player going to where other players are to look for ganks and PvP?
Null and low sec are so hit or miss when it comes to finding shootable targets that a space pilot must enjoy whatever he or she can find.
Also, anybody who looks for PvP targets based upon ship class (BC or greater) is sadly mistaken in assuming that the frigate and cruisers are piloted by inexperienced n00bs.
Some of the most experienced small-scale PvPers that I know fly unassuming tech 1 frigates and cruisers with great aplomb.
If CCP is indeed policing additional systems with undocumented rule-sets then there goes yet another element of the sandbox. 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |

Gatosai
Kaotic Intentions Cold Hand of Shadow
5
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:43:00 -
[278] - Quote
^well said |

Katja Faith
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
146
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:44:00 -
[279] - Quote
Lady Ayeipsia wrote:How about this... Don't harass the noobs doing the sister's of eve epic, grow a set, and fight people who can and will fight back?
You must be new here. :-p Harassing noobs is for the big, tough gamer types who are too chicken-@#%#@ to enter low or null. They have nowhere else to go now that they've been banned from WoW. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:45:00 -
[280] - Quote
Possum's Awesome wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:People gank rookies because they are sad little bastards. It is their mindset to automatically go for the weakest and the youngest targets, mostly because rookies are almost entirely incapable of knowing how or when to fight back.
Another sad carebear projecting his own thought process on other players. This game, ultimately, is about one player blowing up* (teehee) another PERIOD, DOT, End of Sentence. All those rookie poppers are doing is introducing them to the cold hard truth of EVE. They're trying right from the start to filter out the whiney little anti-pvp kids from those that can understand what this game is about right from day one. Aura tells rookies what to expect from this game, if they ignore that lovely voice, they do so at their own peril. There's a rookie channel for those newbies, there's Aura, there's the forums, there's thousands of newbie articles. Countless resources for those new guys to go to, to figure out what's happened and how to stop it. You, sir, are a doodyhead. Poopbreath.
First up, what has me being a carebear got to do with anything? Secondly, all those rookie poppers are doing is proving how well the mentally disturbed/low IQ community are doing at finding something to do on the internet, that does not mean it is a good thing.
As for your assertion that there are plenty of resources for noobs, you are absolutely correct, what you seem to have forgotten, or were maybe too poorly educated to understand, is that people need time to assimilate all that information. That's why rookies are given more protection than everyone else.
If all of this is too difficult for you to follow, I would be happy to arrange for the cast of sesame street to perform this post for you, with the aid of crayon pictures and smaller words. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |
|

Gatosai
Kaotic Intentions Cold Hand of Shadow
5
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:48:00 -
[281] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Possum's Awesome wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:People gank rookies because they are sad little bastards. It is their mindset to automatically go for the weakest and the youngest targets, mostly because rookies are almost entirely incapable of knowing how or when to fight back.
Another sad carebear projecting his own thought process on other players. This game, ultimately, is about one player blowing up* (teehee) another PERIOD, DOT, End of Sentence. All those rookie poppers are doing is introducing them to the cold hard truth of EVE. They're trying right from the start to filter out the whiney little anti-pvp kids from those that can understand what this game is about right from day one. Aura tells rookies what to expect from this game, if they ignore that lovely voice, they do so at their own peril. There's a rookie channel for those newbies, there's Aura, there's the forums, there's thousands of newbie articles. Countless resources for those new guys to go to, to figure out what's happened and how to stop it. You, sir, are a doodyhead. Poopbreath. First up, what has me being a carebear got to do with anything? Secondly, all those rookie poppers are doing is proving how well the mentally disturbed/low IQ community are doing at finding something to do on the internet, that does not mean it is a good thing. As for your assertion that there are plenty of resources for noobs, you are absolutely correct, what you seem to have forgotten, or were maybe too poorly educated to understand, is that people need time to assimilate all that information. That's why rookies are given more protection than everyone else. If all of this is too difficult for you to follow, I would be happy to arrange for the cast of sesame street to perform this post for you, with the aid of crayon pictures and smaller words.
socratic...is that you? XD
|

THE L0CK
Denying You Access
492
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:48:00 -
[282] - Quote
Well it looks like we may be coming to the end of thread with the personal attacks and mudslinging now so I just wanted to say Thank you, 5 stars, was a great read and will read again. Do you smell what the Lock's cooking? |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:50:00 -
[283] - Quote
Gatosai wrote:
socratic...is that you? XD
Who? Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
468
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 15:52:00 -
[284] - Quote
THE L0CK wrote:Well it looks like we may be coming to the end of thread with the personal attacks and mudslinging now so I just wanted to say Thank you, 5 stars, was a great read and will read again.
Hey, it took 15 pages to get to that point. For a moronic thread posted on GD, I would say it did well to get this far. Here is your cookie for visiting, have a nice day!
*gives cookie*
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. Cold Hand of Shadow
117
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 16:36:00 -
[285] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:THE L0CK wrote:Well it looks like we may be coming to the end of thread with the personal attacks and mudslinging now so I just wanted to say Thank you, 5 stars, was a great read and will read again. Hey, it took 15 pages to get to that point. For a moronic thread posted on GD, I would say it did well to get this far. Here is your cookie for visiting, have a nice day! *gives cookie*
You meant Demonic, as this thread clearly labelled me His Infernal Majesty. Also, as terrible/great as this thread is, the answer I was seeking was in fact given. I will be slightly concerned about my 1v1 cans (labelled as such) now causing impairors to die (repeatedly) and causing blatant personal labeling and assumptions, but otherwise my usual activities aren't affected.
I go after the fat fish, not the minnows. |

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Arbitrary Spaceship Destruction -affliction-
10
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 17:33:00 -
[286] - Quote
Rules that can result in bans should not only be clearly defined, but enforced by the game itself. Having these evolving subjective rules posted on a web site and hoping all will read and follow them is simply non optimal implementation
If the root issue is 'wrap rookies in bubble wrap until they are older than 2 weeks' then do that in the code. Make their ships indestructible (and unable to fire on other player ships) while in hisec, make their jet cans un-lootable, issue a CONCORD warning whenever someone attempts to can loot or engage a less-than-2-week old toon....WHATEVER, but do it (and all rules) in the CODE.
The 'but people will always find ways around code' argument is just lazy programming practice. If an issue is important enough to post about and enforce, its important enough to code a rule for. Period.
Now the *morality* of popping newbs can be debated, but don't ask me to glean acceptable behavior restrictions from a frakking web page -- if its not in the code, and i'm playing an evil character in a self proclaimed 'sandbox', I don't give a flying frak what anyone else thinks of my behavior...I decide, not you.
Feyd Ruatha's Killboard |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
1424
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 18:16:00 -
[287] - Quote
and let me just point out here that your web people once again fail
the TOS page where you guys just added these 2 items is so horribly out of date it covers items that don't even exist as issues anymore.
top that off with the "LAST UPDATED 2009" and its complete rubbish The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Pinstar Colton
Sweet Asteroid Acres
138
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 18:22:00 -
[288] - Quote
Having strict lists of things you can and cannot do just invites griefers to find ways of violating the spirit of the rules while not technically breaking them.
For example: Strict rule: You may not shoot players in newbie systems. If you do this you will be banned, if you don't do this you will not be banned.
Griefer: *endlessly bumps a newbie preventing them from warping anywhere at all or doing anything else* "Hey! I'm not shooting at them! You can't report me. I'm not technically breaking any rules"
Keeping things general allows GMs to enforce the spirit of the rule "Don't harass brand new players".
I agree that once a player gets their feet wet, they're fair game, and that teaching players the harshness of EVE early is good.
In other words If a hostile ship locks a player who has no chance in a fight and they don't warp because they still aren't familiar how to do it quickly...they're too new to pop.
If that player knows perfectly well how to warp and chooses not to because they think they're 100% safe in high sec; fire away.
In the cat-and-mouse game that is low sec, there is no shame in learning to be a better mouse. |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
1424
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 18:27:00 -
[289] - Quote
so how does this effect disposable gank alts?
many many gankers are week old characters, how does this fit into the grand scheme of things?
say someone is mining in a SOE system and a newb shows up in a dessie, does this mean its a bannable offense for your defensive screen to shoot first as he's making his run to target, or will the indy's corpmates have to wait until ganked to put up any defense?
perhaps you guys should just ban any activity that isn't noob missions in those systems, because the rule can be misappropriated for evil intent so long as there are viable targets in those areas The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Kimmi Chan
Illuminatus Reforged The Revenant Order
96
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 18:28:00 -
[290] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:I really like arguing with you, its frikken hysterical. As with most people arguing against Tippia and getting ALL CAPS LOCK ALL THE TIME mad about it, you have no idea how misinformed you look to the rest of us. It's a good /popcorn thread at your expense, so thanks for that. As I pointed out to some other rather misinformed poster yesterday, what you see as me being "mad" is just your poorly judged assumption. I also use capslock as a form of emphasis on certain words in place of bold or italics, and because of the fact that you can't increase the font size so that the terminally stupid, illiterate and partially sighted people can read it.
Confirming I am partially sighted - please feel free to CAPS LOCK at will.
-á"Miners mine so I don't have to." ~Metal Icarus |
|

Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
1537
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 18:34:00 -
[291] - Quote
Wow, fifteen pages.
... and so many ... people with questionable mindsets.
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Arbitrary Spaceship Destruction -affliction-
12
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 18:40:00 -
[292] - Quote
Pinstar Colton wrote:Having strict lists of things you can and cannot do just invites griefers to find ways of violating the spirit of the rules while not technically breaking them.
For example: Strict rule: You may not shoot players in newbie systems. If you do this you will be banned, if you don't do this you will not be banned.
Griefer: *endlessly bumps a newbie preventing them from warping anywhere at all or doing anything else* "Hey! I'm not shooting at them! You can't report me. I'm not technically breaking any rules"
Keeping things general allows GMs to enforce the spirit of the rule "Don't harass brand new players". ...
Keeping things 'general' allowed dictatorships, communists, et al the ability to keep their population, store owners et al constantly 'in violation', so that based on purely whim and abstract desires a substantively innocent person was pwned as a 'criminal', because a friend of a politician wanted his store location.... Those that don't learn from the past, are doomed to repeat it, at either the country macro level, or online game micro level...
i.e. Did OP get a warning because of an objective game enforced rule, or did he annoy a newb friend of a Goonswarm exec who then got on the bat phone and called a GM to mete out some retribution? Not saying this happened, but if the game didn't deal with the situation in an automated manner -- how do we know, for any such 'general' circumstance?
All rules must be clearly spelled out and enforced uniformly by game code, not based on abstract or subjective means. If 'bumping' griefing is rampant enough to warrant enforcing against, you put code in place to detect it and provide a consequence....
Point is, you can either evolve a TOS web site and its generalized rules, having many people never know about them or read them; or you can continually polish the CODE of the game to be better each year. My opinion is to keep evolving EVE code, not fricken websites and psuedo Zar's proclamation powers.
Feyd Ruatha's Killboard |

Kerist Lafayette
The Lafayette Family
25
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 18:46:00 -
[293] - Quote
In other words:
Griefer: Haha, n00b, I do what I want, because I can!
CCP: Hello griefer, welcome to your world.
Cue a 15-pages whine thread. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
962
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 18:55:00 -
[294] - Quote
GM Homonoia wrote:My post very clearly mentions rookies. We want everyone to let new players acclimate to the game before they are thrown in with the sharks. By all means, gank, steal from, scam and whatever else you want to experienced players. They should know the crack of the whip.
Two week old player in a badger hauling stuff like moon reagents or capital component blueprints or something that a rookie would /not/ generally have a reason to haul (i.e. a veteran using "younger" alts with an idea that he might shield himself that way)
Fair target? eh |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
71
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 18:56:00 -
[295] - Quote
GM Homonoia wrote:Don't push the line and we will not have to draw it.
Well thought out and clearly defined rules also avoid the need to re-draw lines. You know what we, as a playerbase, are like so it shouldn't be that difficult for you (err on the side of increased mayhem, murder and shenanigans). If you say 8 days for a rookie, why *shouldn't* 9-day old players be targeted?
While I have no interest in going after newbies myself, the longer they're coddled, the more likely they're going to get completely the wrong idea about this game, and make stupid forum posts demanding that Eve become not-Eve (pro-active Concord, ban suicide gankers, ban AFK cloakers, ban anyone who is mean to me, oh, and hold my hand while you lead me through the game from start to finish).
Better to have them get a message when they go to undock, telling them that they are going to be stolen from, scammed, blown up, their corpse violated and their fit mocked without mercy in local, and that's if they're lucky. Give them 3 buttons on the message: I'm scared (aborts the undock and puts actual carebears in their CQ to play with), ok (undocks), and I'm ready to play Eve now (stops the message appearing for future undock attempts). |

THE L0CK
Denying You Access
495
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 19:06:00 -
[296] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:GM Homonoia wrote:My post very clearly mentions rookies. We want everyone to let new players acclimate to the game before they are thrown in with the sharks. By all means, gank, steal from, scam and whatever else you want to experienced players. They should know the crack of the whip. Two week old player in a badger hauling stuff like moon reagents or capital component blueprints or something that a rookie would /not/ generally have a reason to haul (i.e. a veteran using "younger" alts with an idea that he might shield himself that way) Fair target?
This one right here would make a pretty valid argument as to why they DO NOT draw a line and instead go on a case by case basis like they have been trying to explain in futility to a crowd that has more density than iridium. The same would go for all those day old 'noobs' who sit at low sec gates. Do you smell what the Lock's cooking? |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2639
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 19:14:00 -
[297] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:THE L0CK wrote:Well it looks like we may be coming to the end of thread with the personal attacks and mudslinging now so I just wanted to say Thank you, 5 stars, was a great read and will read again. Hey, it took 15 pages to get to that point. For a moronic thread posted on GD, I would say it did well to get this far. Here is your cookie for visiting, have a nice day! *gives cookie* You meant Demonic, as this thread clearly labelled me His Infernal Majesty. Also, as terrible/great as this thread is, the answer I was seeking was in fact given. I will be slightly concerned about my 1v1 cans (labelled as such) now causing impairors to die (repeatedly) and causing blatant personal labeling and assumptions, but otherwise my usual activities aren't affected. I go after the fat fish, not the minnows.
Yeah, keep saying that, maybe you'll get a few other players besides Tippia and her loyal supporters to foolishly stand up for you on false principals.
And judging by some of the replies in this thread, CCP definitely needs to start swinging the Ban-Hammer more often. |

Trappist Monk
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 19:17:00 -
[298] - Quote
1. Not everyone running the SOE arc is a noob. I ran it on my main after 2 yrs. old. 2. Not all X day old characters are new players, many are alts. 3. Since when did crashing any mission space become prohibited? If the issue is noobness, does that mean I can't invade level 1 mission space? Level 2? Is this limited only to the SOE arc? If so, why? 4. Not specifying rules is an excellent way to do whatever the **** you want. It also makes it impossible to verify that the rules are being enforced equitably. That's a problem.
It sure does sound like, if this actually happened with a GM, you should escalate it. I can't think of what rule/policy could be used against you. |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
1425
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 19:20:00 -
[299] - Quote
Trappist Monk wrote:1. Not everyone running the SOE arc is a noob. I ran it on my main after 2 yrs. old. 2. Not all X day old characters are new players, many are alts. 3. Since when did crashing any mission space become prohibited? If the issue is noobness, does that mean I can't invade level 1 mission space? Level 2? Is this limited only to the SOE arc? If so, why? 4. Not specifying rules is an excellent way to do whatever the **** you want. It also makes it impossible to verify that the rules are being enforced equitably. That's a problem.
It sure does sound like, if this actually happened with a GM, you should escalate it. I can't think of what rule/policy could be used against you.
hi, perhaps you should skim the 15 pages before posting
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Trappist Monk
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 19:22:00 -
[300] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Trappist Monk wrote:1. Not everyone running the SOE arc is a noob. I ran it on my main after 2 yrs. old. 2. Not all X day old characters are new players, many are alts. 3. Since when did crashing any mission space become prohibited? If the issue is noobness, does that mean I can't invade level 1 mission space? Level 2? Is this limited only to the SOE arc? If so, why? 4. Not specifying rules is an excellent way to do whatever the **** you want. It also makes it impossible to verify that the rules are being enforced equitably. That's a problem.
It sure does sound like, if this actually happened with a GM, you should escalate it. I can't think of what rule/policy could be used against you. hi, perhaps you should skim the 15 pages before posting No thanks. I'll leave it to you to waste your time. Also, f*ck you. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 .. 11 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |