Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Hroya
Gallente TerraNovae
|
Posted - 2009.12.14 22:05:00 -
[151]
Fix what you need to fix, nerf what you want to nerf, expand what you want to expand. I am still entertained
The grafics, the community, the drama and the laughters.
In EvE 2 things are certain, you log in, you log out. The rest is an adventure.
|
Oscardoodle
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.12.14 22:10:00 -
[152]
Originally by: Maximus Aureilieus The Easy fix is too stop blobbing and actually learn how to fight...Everyone knows you get too many ships in battle lag will occur been that way for years...And the player capacity just keeps growing...fight smaller battles stop use blobb tactics.... Thank you come again!!!!
I got this far in the thread and that's as far as i'm going. If people like you are considered "l33t pvpers" then I must be some sort of glowing god-thing able to smite entire systems with a single fart.
WHEN IN GOD'S NAME HAVE YOU BEEN IN A POS ENGAGEMENT WHERE THERE WAS NO BLOB OF SOME FORM OR ANOTHER?!?!?!?!?
Seriously...you're stupidity is actually making me turn red in the face. What game are you playing anyways? Stop blobbing and learn to fight? Yeah, that's good advice. Especially since when one side realises "Hey! If we blob we'll win easy against this 5 man spider rep bs gang!".
Seriously...go away for ever.
|
Mos7Wan7ed
|
Posted - 2009.12.14 22:22:00 -
[153]
Edited by: Mos7Wan7ed on 14/12/2009 22:23:30 a fix to 0.0 sov warfare?... as soon a sov disruptor is anchored move that system to it's own node until sov is no longer contested for that system. This should be similar to requesting a node for large scale battle.
|
Saffron Liana
Unknown-Entity Initiative Mercenaries
|
Posted - 2009.12.14 22:29:00 -
[154]
Originally by: Mos7Wan7ed Edited by: Mos7Wan7ed on 14/12/2009 22:23:30 a fix to 0.0 sov warfare?... as soon a sov disruptor is anchored move that system to it's own node until sov is no longer contested for that system. This should be similar to requesting a node for large scale battle.
EXCELLENT idea.....wonder why nobody's thought of it before.....
-------------------------------------- There are only two things that will endure indefinitely: the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
-Albert Einstein |
Takakura Hirohito
|
Posted - 2009.12.14 22:31:00 -
[155]
Originally by: Mos7Wan7ed Edited by: Mos7Wan7ed on 14/12/2009 22:23:30 a fix to 0.0 sov warfare?... as soon a sov disruptor is anchored move that system to it's own node until sov is no longer contested for that system. This should be similar to requesting a node for large scale battle.
Yes, this is a great idea, although reinforced nodes are still lagging in 0.0. Like I was saying in my post on the first page, fix the lag first, then allow sovereignty to change hands.
I'm not complaining that there are bugs, its going to happen, and CCP will fix them. I have a HUGE PROBLEM with sovereignty changing hands without the ability to fight over it. Post-dominion, lag in 0.0 has become terrible (again), and fleet engagements are unplayable.
|
Karmic Enigma
|
Posted - 2009.12.14 22:47:00 -
[156]
Originally by: Mos7Wan7ed Edited by: Mos7Wan7ed on 14/12/2009 22:23:30 a fix to 0.0 sov warfare?... as soon a sov disruptor is anchored move that system to it's own node until sov is no longer contested for that system. This should be similar to requesting a node for large scale battle.
This sounds like a good initial fix for the lag... Altough I am not involved in 0.0 warfare, the problem is, can they move system betwen nodes w/o an DT? :(
|
Increm
|
Posted - 2009.12.14 22:49:00 -
[157]
Edited by: Increm on 14/12/2009 22:49:21
Originally by: Gamst
Originally by: TehMasterSword I think HTFU needs to be said in this thread.
It's a free expansion for a game you love. Shut up.
"I'm paying to debug their software."
No you aren't. You are complaining about the bugs. Shut up.
EVE is tough, go play WoW. Can I have your stuff?
Well to be honest it's not really free as we pay month after month after month. That means I pay for this expansion over time. It's nice to think its free though. Eve maybe tough, but that doesn't mean that these Expansions have to come with issues that some haven't seen since 07'. Do you work for CCP because you act like you have been personally attacked on these forums with your angry comments. Other MMO's just milk there customers more because they choose to charge for the expansions which is why I left the other one that I play.
Not free expansion= Paying monthly fee+Paying extra to get new content. Free expansion= Paying monthly fee and not paying extra for new content. Word it however you will, but the expansions cost you nothing extra. They are free.
And no, I do not. I do not have any experience as a programmer or anything like that, the most I could do for them anyway would be testing, coming up with ideas, things like that. The reason you may think I take it so personally is because I really have no patience for stupidity, and this thread is showing a lot of it. I really do get more worked up than I should about this, but the amount of griping is just ridiculous.
(This is TMS, for some reason it keeps wanting Increm to be the profile that gets posted, I forgot to switch it)
|
Mia April
|
Posted - 2009.12.14 22:53:00 -
[158]
I want to be a Space Cowgirl.
Yeeeeehaw! |
Kazini Jax
|
Posted - 2009.12.14 22:58:00 -
[159]
To all those complaining, when Dominion was going through testing did you:
A. Go on to the test server and try to break things to see what wasn't working?
B. Go on to the test server to see what was new that you could exploit to further yourself in the game?
I bet I know what most of the people complaining picked.
|
Greg DaimYo
Caldari Biotronics Inc. Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 00:09:00 -
[160]
Originally by: Kazini Jax To all those complaining, when Dominion was going through testing did you:
A. Go on to the test server and try to break things to see what wasn't working?
B. Go on to the test server to see what was new that you could exploit to further yourself in the game?
I bet I know what most of the people complaining picked.
A. Yes.
B. Yes.
And I wasn't exactly quiet about it.
|
|
Draco Carollis
Amarr The Dead Canary Mining Corporation Legion of Honor
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 00:28:00 -
[161]
Originally by: Mos7Wan7ed Edited by: Mos7Wan7ed on 14/12/2009 22:23:30 a fix to 0.0 sov warfare?... as soon a sov disruptor is anchored move that system to it's own node until sov is no longer contested for that system. This should be similar to requesting a node for large scale battle.
Put this in assembly hall. Get the new CSM to bring it up as a suggestion to CCP.
|
Raithius
Caldari Unknown-Entity Initiative Mercenaries
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 00:52:00 -
[162]
To all whiners and moaners...
Chill the frig out and give CCP some time to to iron out the kinks.
Nuff said really.
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. |
Jondar Valador
Intergalactic Crossing Core Factor
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 01:44:00 -
[163]
Originally by: Saint Mikkel Maybe try blobbing less?
In a game that is famous for its humongous thousand pilots battles, yes, maybe we should have E-HONOURABLE fixed number fights in some sort of instanced arenas perhaps? Or maybe you should just go the **** back to WOW you ****ing ***got.
Am I mad? Hell yes.
****.
|
Chajitsoyo
Gallente Sanford Space Salvage
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 01:48:00 -
[164]
confirming the new browser is awesome. space and planets are purdy too. ---------------------------------
Everything in moderation, including moderation. |
Oscardoodle
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 02:45:00 -
[165]
Originally by: Raithius To all whiners and moaners...
Chill the frig out and give CCP some time to to iron out the kinks.
Nuff said really.
Because the several months leading up to Dominion back when it was first announced weren't enough time to test and bug hunt. It makes total sense to make it live on TQ even though its broken and unfinished.
Yeah, we're being really unreasonable guys. Everyone stfu.
|
Raithius
Caldari Unknown-Entity Initiative Mercenaries
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 04:25:00 -
[166]
Edited by: Raithius on 15/12/2009 04:27:08
Originally by: Oscardoodle
Originally by: Raithius To all whiners and moaners...
Chill the frig out and give CCP some time to to iron out the kinks.
Nuff said really.
Because the several months leading up to Dominion back when it was first announced weren't enough time to test and bug hunt. It makes total sense to make it live on TQ even though its broken and unfinished.
Yeah, we're being really unreasonable guys. Everyone stfu.
Yeah you are. As a matter of fact i think your complaining just for the hell of it. EVERY piece of software has bugs, thousands of them, its unreasonable to blame ccp for not being able to find all of them with Borg like efficency... actually why dont we do that, turn CCP offices into giant borg cubes and assimalate the staff so you can have your completely bug free Eve experiance now on launch damnit!.
Grow up and get real. Go learn C++ or something and create the worlds first bug free client so maybe you'll understand a little more of what youre talking about. Untill then, stfu.
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. |
MadMentor
Macabre Votum Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 06:14:00 -
[167]
Originally by: Traderjohn Edited by: Traderjohn on 13/12/2009 21:53:32 The IHubs are bugged with regards to upgrades. However Can we start by getting other things right instead of issues with IHubs. For starters: The Capacity of systems.
Meaning - Everytime we are about to have a fight of over 300 in local (total or more) the node freezes, Lags and then dies.
CCP then refuse to reimburse ships lost in combat in these situations. This is a daily issue with local capacities being unable to take any combat action.
Also hidden things not in patch notes. Specifically the ability to Dommsday ships in lowsec. Then an instant fix to this without anything in patch notes.
/signed
---
|
Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 08:01:00 -
[168]
Looks like ccp needs to redirect some of the company budget back into upping nullsec server capacity. Even a few moar blades per region would do wonders for the higher density nullsec that is now rather populated and trying to pew pew as per your dominion get em into nullsec mandate.
Originally by: Akita T We don't hate people like you, we look at you with mostly pity and a hint of disgust balled up in a big wad of "notto disu shi'tto agen".
|
Prince Spiderman
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 08:29:00 -
[169]
Edited by: Prince Spiderman on 15/12/2009 08:36:13
Originally by: AgentFruitfly Confirmed: Dominion results in bigger blobs, not smaller.
There is no blob, there's a fleet. Just a bigger fleet. Period.
The main reason of the so called "blob" or just name it "the fleet what makes you whine" is: A) simple: just to dominate,kill and win B) very simple: whoring the km C) it is how it is because that's it
Every whine about blobs is senseless. I repeat: SENSELESS. Bring numbers and play or live with beeing outnumbered. Why should 90% of a fleet stay out of a fight just to make it fair?!
I never can imagine any war in the world where just a part of troops were sent to fight just to make it fair.
Learn how EVE works and learn how to react or deal with situations. Then you will learn to fight or stay away from it.
|
UneFraiseDansUneChaise
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 08:45:00 -
[170]
I'm still quite amused by the implication that a bug as basic as the invulnerability function of a major sov component could only be revealed by the input of tens of thousands of players. This isn't exactly something triggered by a perfect storm of preconditions.
|
|
sdchew
Gallente Jazz Associates
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 09:43:00 -
[171]
This is my 6th year in EVE. And my mail signature is as accurate as the day in 2004 I put it there.
The day that EVE is truly bug-free, the EVE Gate will probably go super nova and kill us all. |
gumble85
Amarr AUS Corporation United Front Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 09:44:00 -
[172]
It is always nice to see a game company take advantage of their client base and/or screw them in the process. I only read half the first page and i agree with a lot of what has been said.
1: Sov needs to be fixed and fixed properly and bloody yester-god-damn-day. 2: Lag needs to be fixed and bloody yester-god-damn-day. 3: CCP need to get their heads out of the money troff and smell the ****e they have caused.
As someone said. We have not had this many bugs in this game in a long, long, long bloody while. I reckon it is safer to play with a prossie on a street corner than this game atm. Cause you got less chance of getting a bug and being screwed over by the GM's for it. :)
Just my two cents. __________________________________________________
gumble by name - grumble by nature |
Prince Spiderman
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 10:20:00 -
[173]
Originally by: gumble85 It is always nice to see a game company take advantage of their client base and/or screw them in the process. I only read half the first page and i agree with a lot of what has been said.
1: Sov needs to be fixed and fixed properly and bloody yester-god-damn-day. 2: Lag needs to be fixed and bloody yester-god-damn-day. 3: CCP need to get their heads out of the money troff and smell the ****e they have caused.
As someone said. We have not had this many bugs in this game in a long, long, long bloody while. I reckon it is safer to play with a prossie on a street corner than this game atm. Cause you got less chance of getting a bug and being screwed over by the GM's for it. :)
Just my two cents.
My question now is: if so many player that frustrated in anger and believe that CCP has transformed to a bunch of money-sucking m**t**f***k**s ... why not just quitting the game and find another sense in life?
|
Sultan Khan
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 10:54:00 -
[174]
Hi I'm a noob, barely 1 month old in the dominion. My online gamming activity revolves mostly around the simulator genre. As a light hearted change I sometimes play WoW. I enjoyed that very much as a release from serious simming in LockOn - Flamming Clifs - Blackshark, even the Silent Hounter series over the years.
I heard about EVE several years ago but it was only recently that I made the jump.
Sadly from my limited experience, listening to the various chat channels and reading threads like these, Ive decided that I will not continue my EvE subscription.
I have arrived a year or two to late.
EvE is going, it appears, they same way WoW has and many, if not all, games that enjoy success. A poster on the first page of this thread hit the nail on the head. Money !!
Up to a critical point most developers will develop in accordance with their dreams and visions for the utopian gamming experience, but once they achieve a critical mass of success, once their success demands expansion and greater coorperate commitment, the money men move in..... decisions that were once based on 'will it make the game more fun, or more realistic or more challenging' submit to the demand that all development is filtered by ' will it make more money, will it increase subscribers, will it make things easy enough so we dont loose subscribers' etc.
Like WoW , EvE appears to be on this road. It spoilt WoW for me and I can see my interest waining very rapidly here for the same reason. So much so that I am about to cancell my subscription.
Like in the real world everywhere nowadays, whether it be local affairs, regional , national or international, the bankers ,accountants and money men actually make the decisions. Whats 'good' for you and me is left out of the equation.
As a programmer for over 30 years I know that software development can be a fikkle place to work and sometimes it is hard to get things right, but I also can recognise when someone is trying to pull the wool over my eyes.
CCP is beyond the critical point, it HAS to generate cash as its priority, else it goes under. No longer do the dreams and imaginations of the core developers determine the course of development, accountants do!!! So whilst , as a noob I dont understand much of the technical ingame stuff being discussed in this thread, the symtoms show through clearly.
Eve has grown too big, for the purists .... time to move on , I think!! Regards to you all , may each of you find the path that takes you to your dream.
Salute
|
Xuan Long
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 11:00:00 -
[175]
Edited by: Xuan Long on 15/12/2009 11:04:30
Originally by: Scatim Helicon Edited by: Scatim Helicon on 13/12/2009 22:35:58
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Wrangler Senior Community Manager CCP Hf, EVE Online Contact us
If it's stupid but works, it isn't stupid.
And if it's stupid and doesn't work, its Dominion.
Releasing a bugged system where infrastructure is supposed to be invulnerable but isn't, and then relying on alliances to pledge on their Scout's Honour not to attack each other's structures until we're supposed to is a ridiculous state of affairs. It was evident weeks ago that Dominion was still a work-in-progress, was barely tested, and should be delayed until things were fixed but you blundered on regardless to hit your magic December 1st deadline, and what do we have as a result? Infrastructure that is shootable when it shouldn't be, anomalies that don't despawn when they should, the return of lag that we haven't seen since 2007, and motherships that nobody wants to fly.
But hey, at least we have an ingame browser and damage warning sounds I guess
In a such competitive market as that of Online games, any company who shows unforgivable careleness, greediness, arrogance, luck of professionalism towards its members (players), is foredoomed to die. It supposed that any new patch will make this game better. The relapce of the terrible lag,the problem with infrastracture invulnerability etc, of the new patch Dominion, show one thing: CCP has already forgotten that "Nothing lasts for ever"
|
Xuan Long
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 11:27:00 -
[176]
Originally by: Prince Spiderman Edited by: Prince Spiderman on 15/12/2009 10:41:57
Originally by: gumble85 It is always nice to see a game company take advantage of their client base and/or screw them in the process. I only read half the first page and i agree with a lot of what has been said.
1: Sov needs to be fixed and fixed properly and bloody yester-god-damn-day. 2: Lag needs to be fixed and bloody yester-god-damn-day. 3: CCP need to get their heads out of the money troff and smell the ****e they have caused.
As someone said. We have not had this many bugs in this game in a long, long, long bloody while. I reckon it is safer to play with a prossie on a street corner than this game atm. Cause you got less chance of getting a bug and being screwed over by the GM's for it. :)
Just my two cents.
My serious question now is: if so many player that frustrated in anger and believe that CCP has transformed to a bunch of money-sucking m**t**f***k**s ... why not just quitting the game and find another sense in life?
It's because they love this game and they dont want to see it destroyed. Actually is a protest ! a hit at CCP nose to wake up before it is too late for the game. Otherwise eventually all players will go away, except u who propably like this situation !!!
|
Death's tool
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 12:23:00 -
[177]
It's not a "Bug" It's a "Feature"
|
Eljar Kjeldsson
Caldari The Hull Miners Union Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 14:30:00 -
[178]
Originally by: Sultan Khan
tl;dr noob ragequit
Can I haz your stuff? |
Bodega Cat
|
Posted - 2009.12.15 16:00:00 -
[179]
Originally by: Such'A'Kawaii'Morning
All this talk about there not being enough people on test server to find these problems is bull****.
It takes one person to find out his anomaly isn't despawning like it should. It takes one person to shoot an invulnerable structure and find out it's taking damage. It takes one person to shoot another invulnerable structure and find out it's taking damage. Whiteknight ccp all you want, but the fact that they couldn't have one person shoot one ****ing object that's part of the focus of the expansion during all their testing speaks volumes. That's being lenient. There's still two other huge sov related bugs that never should have gotten past QA.
Actually, thats precisely how bug testing looks in retrospect. Most all of them you would look at and say "I can't believe no one found that" but the reality of the situation is things get looked over! Lets say for example, 9 out of 10 test cases, when the node says "its invulnerable" it is, so the tester looked at it, saw it was invuln, and put a check mark next to it. Little did he know, that unlike the other 9 times he tried to shoot it, this time, he actually could have.
You don't work in software obviously.
|
Vaneshi SnowCrash
|
Posted - 2009.12.16 10:38:00 -
[180]
Originally by: Eljar Kjeldsson
Originally by: Sultan Khan
tl;dr noob ragequit
Can I haz your stuff?
You really want a shuttle BPO, civillian data core, low end skill boots and an assorted collection of noob ships/low end haulers/frigates?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |