| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 .. 21 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Miriya Satori
Reliables Inc
Majesta Empire
   |
Posted - 2010.04.15 23:10:00 -
[541]
CCP at its best again.
|
Torhal Nuke
Mystic Lion Hearts
Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 00:49:00 -
[542]
signed |
Bomberlocks
Star Bombers
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 01:32:00 -
[543]
/signed
|
Hazel Starr
Krypteia Brotherhood
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 02:36:00 -
[544]
Crass idea...should not be implemented;
And I have no hidden deepspace assets,
-- Haze
|
Jarnis McPieksu
Insidious Existence
En Garde
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 05:46:00 -
[545]
Supported.
|
Rafael Tonka
Point of No Return
Waterboard
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 06:05:00 -
[546]
Signed. Better to make changes to scanning mechanics which would increase the maximum scan range than to impose this limit on warping. Space is limitless and these safes took time and effort to create. Use some more time and effort CCP and work on an alternative.
|
Rafael Tonka
Point of No Return
Waterboard
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 06:11:00 -
[547]
missed the support box in last post! corrected
|
Strogen Mkok
University of Caille
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 07:04:00 -
[548]
Supported
|
Im Blue
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 07:42:00 -
[549]
signed, its not broken dont fix it.
|
Kythren
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 10:51:00 -
[550]
remember remember the 13th of april the hyprid, missiles and tactics, i know of no reason for the deepsafe treason to ever be forgot.
-----
<sarcasm="inside">
murmur<->eve authentication script(python)
http://mumble.sourceforge.net/Mumble, the |
|
|
Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din
Cult of War
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 11:35:00 -
[551]
Deep safes dont harm the game and are actually pretty realistic, you just wouldnt park your ship where it can be found...
Also, destroying anything outside this limit is ridiculously harsh, just move it.
Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |
Vjorn Angannon
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 14:53:00 -
[552]
Absolutely, positively, and wholeheartedly signed!!!!!
Wanton destruction of property just 'coz it's parked outside of an imaginary wall???? What are you thinking, CCP?????
Just in case ya didn't know.....space.....is deep and vast.....
*shakes head*
Vj
|
Mattk50
Executive Intervention
Primary.
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 15:55:00 -
[553]
CCP's grips is the way deep safes are made is pretty much an exploit. however, what ccp should do is make a valid way to make deep safes... such as... a 1 hour deep safe production cycle on my buzzard... perhaps...
|
Cobalt Valkyrie
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 19:06:00 -
[554]
*supports this topic* |
MonaLisa Overdrive
Elflings
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 20:13:00 -
[555]
Signed
|
Valerie Starke
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 20:38:00 -
[556]
/signed
No vastly sweeping changes of this sort should involve the arbitrary destruction of a player's assets in this manner unless you plan and replacing the exact same items at a later time within the confines of the newly 'acceptable' space. Of course a far simpler solution would be to, upon their next login, force them to warp somewhere within the new confines. This would make them vacate the deep safe without destroying their ship or e-warping them to a known and possibly camped location.
|
Barashi Nugan
Zero Point Group
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 21:56:00 -
[557]
Signed.
|
g0nz028
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 23:24:00 -
[558]
deep safes nerf kills sandbox.
/signed
|
Ephemeron
Retribution Corp.
Initiative Associates
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 23:57:00 -
[559]
I am on the edge of CCP now. I like EVE but I really dislike CCP
If they totally ignore this massive public outcry and implement their silly needless nerf, it will prove once and for all that they really don't care about the player base. And then I'm quitting for good. Other games may not be as hardcore, but at least most of them don't **** me off every time I read the patch notes.
|
javer
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 01:23:00 -
[560]
Edited by: javer on 17/04/2010 01:23:23
/signed
--------------------------------------------
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their Level and beat you with experience. |
|
|
Marlona Sky
D00M.
RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 07:45:00 -
[561]
Ok, so now they revised the plan you can view in the latest dev blog which you can find here. So, no need to keep replying to this thread and plug up those tear ducts.
|
NereSky
Maelstrom Crew
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 08:24:00 -
[562]
Supported |
Cerea Gleeve
Stardust Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 11:19:00 -
[563]
/signed
|
Cyc Lilith
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 13:25:00 -
[564]
*supported*
|
greymouse
Black Eclipse Corp
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 13:40:00 -
[565]
/me adds support
Cry Havoc!! Release the Mice of Menace!!! |
STUNTM4N
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 15:59:00 -
[566]
/signed
|
tvol
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 16:53:00 -
[567]
Signed.
|
Ephemeron
Retribution Corp.
Initiative Associates
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 19:59:00 -
[568]
 Originally by: Marlona Sky
Ok, so now they revised the plan you can view in the latest dev blog which you can find here. So, no need to keep replying to this thread and plug up those tear ducts.
I read that new blog and it looks better, a compromise. But it is still a bad and more importantly - needless nerf.
But it doesn't answer WHY they are doing this whole thing in the first place.
Is it really about the scanning issue? If it is, why go with a negative solution of reducing game features and ****ing people off instead of a positive solution to make the scanner better?
And why is this kind of "crap" is actually being worked on before many other things, things players actually wait 6+ months for.
On whose initiative has this whole bookmark process been started? who is responsible?
|
Jerid Verges
Gallente
The Society of Innovation
The Last Stand
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 21:25:00 -
[569]
Edited by: Jerid Verges on 17/04/2010 21:26:26
Originally by: Ephemeron
But it is still a bad and more importantly - needless nerf.
It's not a nerf at all. It's a rebalance.
The warp logoff bug (Poseidon) will be removed. And all the stuff will be moved not destroyed. And in fact you CAN now (after Tyrannis launches) make bookmarks beyond 20AU and warp to them.
However you will have to do it with the legitimate game mechanics placed NOW.
This is taking an unfair advantage older players had and bringing them down to newer player's level.
This is a good compromise.
|
Ephemeron
Retribution Corp.
Initiative Associates
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 22:08:00 -
[570]
Quote:
And in fact you CAN now (after Tyrannis launches) make bookmarks beyond 20AU and warp to them.
However you will have to do it with the legitimate game mechanics placed NOW.
If that is true then the negative impact of this whole affair will be very small. My primary concern was PvP situations where I warp in large systems and sometimes need to make bms in the middle of warp, which can be 10+ or even 20+ AU from nearest object. There are some systems with 280 AU warps, maybe with 80 AU warps.
Even so, I still think this whole bookmark business points out to a flaw in CCP's priority list. There's something not right about this whole thing. I don't remember any major threads from the community calling for action on this issue.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 .. 21 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |