| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bunyip
Center for Advanced Studies
   |
Posted - 2010.04.13 17:40:00 -
[151]
While I don't necessarily disagree with the removal of deep safe spots, as it's extra information the BM database would have to contend with, the deletion of any items outside of them does seem a little harsh. Why not simply transfer the items to the nearest low-sec or null-sec NPC station instead?
My main question refers to missions placed outside this arbitrary limit. I've gone to missions that were 16 AU+ from the nearest cosmic object - will I now not be able to do such missions if they aren't changed?
I'd say to change the AU limit to 30 AU. This way, probes can still find the responsible parties, but it gives us a little more space to explore.
Somewhat supported, but I'm not completely against the initial idea CCP has if it is tweaked slightly.
"May all your hits be crits." - Knights of the Dinner Table. |
Alar Tangor
Decadence.
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 17:49:00 -
[152]
Supported! Eve is not and never was an even playing field and deep safes profit everyone wanting fleetfights in 0.0
|
Raivi
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 17:50:00 -
[153]
Signed
---------------------------------------------
|
RaiviM
Explosion Matrix
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 17:51:00 -
[154]
Edited by: RaiviM on 13/04/2010 17:52:36
This change is badly thought out and is simply going to create a new set of haves and havenots. Add to that the decision to destroy the ships of unsubbed players and I really have to wonder if anyone actually sat down and thought about the effects of this change at CCP before posting the blog.
-----Explosion Matrix-----
Nostrum Nomen est Ridiculum |
Jerid Verges
Gallente
The Society of Innovation
The Last Stand
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 17:53:00 -
[155]
 Originally by: darius mclever
yes only old players can read the documentation freely avaiable on the internet to make deep safe spots. 
You will never get 1000 AU safes with those tactics. The simple FACT is that older players who were around before the nano nerf have safes that are impossible to duplicate and impossible to probe out.
God you are such a bad troll.
|
Avalloc
GoonWaffe
SOLODRAKBANSOLODRAKBANSO
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 17:55:00 -
[156]
Signed.
If there is a game/server performance reason for this change then CCP needs to elaborate. Destroying bm and property in deep safe spots is unacceptable.
|
RadioControlled
Dvice Shipyards
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:03:00 -
[157]
Originally by: Jerid Verges
Originally by: darius mclever
yes only old players can read the documentation freely avaiable on the internet to make deep safe spots.
You will never get 1000 AU safes with those tactics. The simple FACT is that older players who were around before the nano nerf have safes that are impossible to duplicate and impossible to probe out.
God you are such a bad troll.
Bullshit. Looked in the mirror lately?
Petition signed.
|
Gunner
The Collective
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:04:00 -
[158]
So you want my stuff CCP? Bad idea!
*** 2007.10.06 R.I.P. Hatuk my friend.
|
BraveLttl Toaster
Intergalactic Hunters of ManBearPig
Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:04:00 -
[159]
if the issue is 'haves' and 'have-nots', why am i able to make a new characer right now and make deep safes, honestly ccp do you even play this game.
|
Marlona Sky
D00M.
RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:05:00 -
[160]
Edited by: Marlona Sky on 13/04/2010 18:06:06
Just have the people logged at the deep safes 'auto' sent to a new safe spot randomly within the solar system.
Also  @ all the players that are opposed to the change completely, running around waving a "But it's not fair to those deployed/taking break from eve" crap. I wonder how many of you are just saying that so CCP doesn't get rid of your deep safes.
The deep safes need to be removed one way or another, I suggest you help with suggestions on how this is deployed instead of tearing up on threads.
|
|
|
Majst0r
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:09:00 -
[161]
Don't delete our stuff!
|
Atigone
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:09:00 -
[162]
Signed
|
Kalicrates
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:10:00 -
[163]
Signed.
Rich Rocks And Laser Death |
LdyLye
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:12:00 -
[164]
Edited by: LdyLye on 13/04/2010 18:16:17
Do not restrict the space 
Signed.
|
Alex SOKOLOFF
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:12:00 -
[165]
|
RX 700
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:12:00 -
[166]
have you fixed lag yet to take suck measures ... or you just want to take away the last chance to defend something if you are too late to get in system?
|
Saul Reaver
Oberon Incorporated
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:12:00 -
[167]
Signed. There is alot of isk floating out there in those deepsafes CCP. If you just simply "Destroy" the ships then i think that is going a bit too far.
At least move the ships to a safespot on grid with pilots being warned in advance.
|
Vik Luk
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:13:00 -
[168]
|
Lady Ann
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:13:00 -
[169]
|
Daedalus Imperator
Northstar Cabal
OWN Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:14:00 -
[170]
Signed
|
|
|
chamallow
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:15:00 -
[171]
+1
|
TheDarkestDestroyer
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:16:00 -
[172]
Edited by: TheDarkestDestroyer on 13/04/2010 18:17:24
The people who agree with this probably cry in local all the time because they can't find people to gank. Space is BIG and any player can make deep safe spots the notion that you can't is preposterous and deleting people's belongings and bookmarks is also ridiculous.
I'm also getting sick and tired of this whiny new player crap. Seriously older players have advantages because they're older and have more skills and experience it's the nature of the game....or at least it is in other games that aren't nerfed every couple of months. It seems like CCP always loves to remove things that can easily be countered to accommodate the noobs.
And I agree brave I doubt CCP even plays this game I think the lag and all the nerfs drove them away years ago.
|
Yume Mei
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:16:00 -
[173]
|
Drevin Marks
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:16:00 -
[174]
|
LuceOscura
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:17:00 -
[175]
|
Boldt
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:18:00 -
[176]
All in favor
|
SupaKow2
Northstar Cabal
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:18:00 -
[177]
Yay for Deep Safes!
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:19:00 -
[178]
Originally by: Jerid Verges
Originally by: darius mclever
yes only old players can read the documentation freely avaiable on the internet to make deep safe spots.
You will never get 1000 AU safes with those tactics. The simple FACT is that older players who were around before the nano nerf have safes that are impossible to duplicate and impossible to probe out.
God you are such a bad troll.
one day ... when you stopped mining too much or running too many missions you will understand it.
|
Maegashira
Free-Space-Ranger
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:19:00 -
[179]
stupid idea
focus on the real issues
|
Trayci
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:21:00 -
[180]
Signed.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |