| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Brian Khan
StarHunt
Systematic-Chaos
   |
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:42:00 -
[451]
|
Doris Dragonbreath
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:42:00 -
[452]
|
Mia Silverfang
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:43:00 -
[453]
I want my deep safes.
|
Vlad Wormwing
StarHunt
Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:43:00 -
[454]
Not my deep safes.
|
Li Freeman
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:43:00 -
[455]
|
Linda Dreamwalker
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:44:00 -
[456]
|
Kaarnakivi
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:44:00 -
[457]
|
NeutronRonk
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:45:00 -
[458]
|
Tehnomaag
StarHunt
Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:45:00 -
[459]
I agree. We need deep safes in sov warfare and if needed alternative method of creating them should be introduced.
|
Orree
Dynaverse Corporation
Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:51:00 -
[460]
Supported.
----------
"How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct." ---Benjamin Disraeli |
|
|
Amberlamps
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 17:54:00 -
[461]
Abso****inglutely signed, confining the "Sandbox" to a Palm full of sand just isn't cool. Keeping in mind that they have countered logoffski warps it will be impossible to reach behind the 10AU spots so realistically there will only be a handful of players who have bookmarks behind the stargates and planets making it EXTREMELY unbalanced as a handful of players will have ~10au bookmarks from celestials whereas the vast majority of the player base will not have.
Keeping in mind that it is perfectly viable for anyone at the current state TQ is at to make their own "Deep safe spots" and it isn't that hard to probe out to a few hundred AU with Deep safe probes. CCP should take a different apporach to solving problems rather than listening to the first thing "Nerfoper" otherwise know as a "CCP Developer" puts on the table. It's the easy way out everytime and I for one am getting ****ing sick of it.
Similar to minerals worth crap all... instead of killing off the masses of macro miners they nerf missions.
Get your act together CCP
|
Firvain
Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:02:00 -
[462]
signed!
|
wiersma
RBL Industries
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:05:00 -
[463]
I support
keep deep space safe spots alive, dont limit the sandbox.
================================================
Mining is the extraction of valuable minerals or other geological materials from SPACE... :-P |
Arboreal Feline
Nondegradable Tritanium Space Rodents
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:07:00 -
[464]
/me Supports the topic in the face.
|
Atius Shinkan
UK Corp
Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:33:00 -
[465]
Damn! Keep the deepsafe's and work on a probe solutions instead.
Give use more challenges not limit them!
|
Joo Joobee
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 18:59:00 -
[466]
I do not support this topic. Deep safes are a special defect that have been exploited for far too long in this game.
Learn to play in the same sandbox as everyone else, rather than use exploits to your personal advantage.
|
Amberlamps
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:14:00 -
[467]
 Originally by: Joo Joobee
I do not support this topic. Deep safes are a special defect that have been exploited for far too long in this game.
Learn to play in the same sandbox as everyone else, rather than use exploits to your personal advantage.
Everyone else is able to make deepsafe spots so its not a personal or even a corporation wide advantage. Everyone can make currently make them... learn to do so and you can even make them in an Orca.
|
Meluria Deshin
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:34:00 -
[468]
Support
|
Mulara Miran
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:34:00 -
[469]
support
|
Akirad Deshin
Free-Space-Ranger
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:35:00 -
[470]
|
|
|
Sandra Yates
Minmatar
Free-Space-Ranger
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:36:00 -
[471]
agreed
|
Aloma Deshin
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:36:00 -
[472]
|
Yuniko Karisei
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:37:00 -
[473]
|
XT 290
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:37:00 -
[474]
/signed
|
XT 280
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:38:00 -
[475]
|
Illrean
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:40:00 -
[476]
Originally by: TeaDaze
A recent dev blog stated that deep safes are going to be removed along with any items outside this new "Wall".
We the undersigned disagree with the planned removal of existing deep safes (and related destruction of property) and request that CCP re-evaluate this decision with input from the players.
Alternative methods for finding deep safes etc can be discussed, but the focus here is to show CCP that the players disagree with further limiting the sandbox.
Please reply to this thread and tick the "support this topic" box to register your dissatisfaction.
You put two issues here one of which I support and the other I can't.
I am against the destruction of floating property, however, due to the questionable means used to create Poseidon Deep Safes I have to agree with their removal. I would also bet there are data base issues involved, EVE star systems are big, but every game has to set game field boundaries.
|
XT 270
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:40:00 -
[477]
|
XT 3489
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:43:00 -
[478]
|
Cpt Iwan
4S Corporation
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 19:53:00 -
[479]
signed
|
SmokeyUK
Gallente
Battlestars
Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 20:00:00 -
[480]
/signed
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |