| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
LittleNova
Caldari
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
   |
Posted - 2010.04.15 06:54:00 -
[511]
/signed.
While I agree that compeltely unscannable deep safes need to go, everything that's scannable(let's say within the range of a Deep Space probe from a celestial) should be left as it is.
Also, arbitrarly destroying people's stuff is bad.
Also, how about fixing something that actually needs fixing instead of this? Like...ummm lag? Or rockets? Or the Hel?
|
Gagarish
Amarr
VVS Corporition
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 07:20:00 -
[512]
Sighned. CCP go to HELL. U do it - I quit this fngkuci game.
|
Tawty
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 07:25:00 -
[513]
Seriously, WTF! Not even enough warning to get my ****e out. |
xracerNL
Fusion Enterprises Ltd
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 07:59:00 -
[514]
Signed |
Ralle030583
Mystic Lion Hearts
Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 08:05:00 -
[515]
/signed
|
Nangil
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 08:07:00 -
[516]
signed. ccp makes changes for changes. another stupid ****.
soon the players who pay by credit card leave the game... Think better ccp.
|
ALTMACTEP XXX
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 08:09:00 -
[517]
signed. another total mistake by ccp.
|
NITRO STALKER
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 08:11:00 -
[518]
signed!!! make changes for players, not for changes...
|
Splithorizon
4S Corporation
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 08:20:00 -
[519]
Edited by: Splithorizon on 15/04/2010 08:20:14
I think 10AU and destroying all items is abit to extreme.
Moving items and maybe 50-100AU atleast, sounds better to me.
|
Loash
Demented But Determined
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 08:29:00 -
[520]
/signed |
|
|
Baneken
Aseveljet
Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 09:29:00 -
[521]
/supported
Correct way to do is to move stuff inside the set boundaries.
While I understand the reasons (fleet boosting, assigning fighters etc. from an unscannable & unreachable safe) behind removal of everything from out side 10AU boundary, destroying super caps etc. immediately is way too harsh.
|
Miyu Gear
Pangalactic Punks n' Playboys
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 09:40:00 -
[522]
---------------------------
"Those, who live by the sword, will be gunned down by those, who don't."
FOR THE HONOUR OF THE CHAPTER! |
Vanakov Mek'lanavar
Sileo In Pacis
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 10:20:00 -
[523]
|
Marlona Sky
D00M.
RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 10:43:00 -
[524]
Wow. The tears this thread is generating is pure win. Shame you guys quickly rage post and failed to read how CCP is re-evaluating this. Instead you just blindly rage on. 
|
Gunnanmon
Gallente
The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 10:54:00 -
[525]
 Originally by: TeaDaze
We the undersigned disagree with the planned removal of existing deep safes (and related destruction of property) and request that CCP re-evaluate this decision with input from the players.
We do?
Signature locked for discussing moderation. Navigator
|
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 10:57:00 -
[526]
Originally by: Marlona Sky
Wow. The tears this thread is generating is pure win. Shame you guys quickly rage post and failed to read how CCP is re-evaluating this. Instead you just blindly rage on.
With all due respect, until CCP actually state what they are planning to change it is valid for people to state their dissatisfaction with the original dev blog.
It is however a shame that so many people saying /signed neglected to click the "Support" box when posting 
Originally by: Gunnanmon
Originally by: TeaDaze
We the undersigned disagree with the planned removal of existing deep safes (and related destruction of property) and request that CCP re-evaluate this decision with input from the players.
We do?
We in this context being the people who indicated their support of this thread.
If you don't have a problem with the original implementation including deleting player property then you don't fit into the "we" here, no harm no foul.
Vote TeaDaze for CSM5!
|
Asagi Kimura
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 11:03:00 -
[527]
/signed
|
ferullo0
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 11:56:00 -
[528]
Signed.
|
Jeannaqua
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 13:38:00 -
[529]
CCP, Space is big! It should stay that way!
|
Johnny Trigger
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 14:19:00 -
[530]
bad idea to put a limit on 'space'
|
|
|
Driven Instinct
Silent Ascension
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 14:27:00 -
[531]
Signed |
Evan Batarr
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 16:37:00 -
[532]
/signed
(One of the) Dumbest Dev Blog(s) evah!
|
Arina
Free-Space-Ranger
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 17:24:00 -
[533]
/singed
|
Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises
Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 17:56:00 -
[534]
We can accept the removal of deep safes once the ability to put 200+ into a grid without it freaking out is added. Unless you also want to remove capital ships, because last I looked, no one is using them due to the grid bug.
This signature is useless, but it is red.
|
Marlona Sky
D00M.
RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 18:00:00 -
[535]
Originally by: TeaDaze
Originally by: Marlona Sky
Wow. The tears this thread is generating is pure win. Shame you guys quickly rage post and failed to read how CCP is re-evaluating this. Instead you just blindly rage on.
With all due respect, until CCP actually state what they are planning to change it is valid for people to state their dissatisfaction with the original dev blog.
You should change your OP then. Right now if people read it, it is deceiving that CCP has not considered anything.
Then again, I am enjoying all these emo tears form people threatened to have their super safe spots nerfed and the playing field leveled.
|
TeaDaze
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 18:57:00 -
[536]
Originally by: Marlona Sky
You should change your OP then. Right now if people read it, it is deceiving that CCP has not considered anything.
Until something more than "we are thinking about it and will update the dev blog at some point" comes out then the OP will remain as is.
Originally by: Marlona Sky
Then again, I am enjoying all these emo tears form people threatened to have their super safe spots nerfed and the playing field leveled.
It doesn't level the playing field at all. People who used recent techniques to make off axis safes which are within the new space wall will still have an advantage over players who can only warp between celestials. And there are many many other "unfair" areas that are remaining untouched
Implying that deep safes are utterly unbalancing the game for the majority of players are frankly absurd 
I don't class people saying signed as emo rage or tears, but we'll agree to disagree there
Vote TeaDaze for CSM5!
|
Ephemeron
Retribution Corp.
Initiative Associates
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 20:55:00 -
[537]
I have read the dev blog, and frankly I'm stunned
I have rather low opinion of CCP game designers, but even I didn't think they'd do something like this. This is a new low. Like many others, I'm deeply disappointed.
Why must the game be changed to be more cumbersome and frustrating for the user? It goes completely against the nature of gaming - which is to entertain. It goes against personal feeling of progress - the game is regressing in features and capabilities.
If scanning people down was the key motivator behind this change, then a much more appropriate solution would be to improve the scanning system to handle these cases.
I'm just glad I was lucky enough to play this game in the years of 2005-2007, before it started becoming to annoying and frustrating.
|
Ayd
TEMPLAR.
Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 21:32:00 -
[538]
/signed
|
Marlona Sky
D00M.
RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 21:39:00 -
[539]
Originally by: TeaDaze
Until something more than "we are thinking about it and will update the dev blog at some point" comes out then the OP will remain as is.
Like I said, I enjoy the tears.
Originally by: TeaDaze
Implying that deep safes are utterly unbalancing the game for the majority of players are frankly absurd
Where did I imply that deep safes were utterly unbalancing the game?
If you feel manipulating my words helps your thread, I guess there is not much I can do about that.
Again, I for one am enjoying these tears. 
|
Henry Jennings
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 22:22:00 -
[540]
Hey CCP, april fools was 2 weeks ago, get lost with this idea.
-3 accounts if it goes through as planned.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |