Originally by: Corsair Blade

---

Edited by: Corsair Blade on 05/05/2010 23:57:56
http://evajobse.net/

I find it telling that in your CV placed on this site of yours you claim to have been employed by CCP.

Doing volunteer work does not mean you are employed by said firm.

---

Originally by: ViolenTUK

---

In the UK volunteer work is considered employment by law and has its own set of legal rights. Not only is it commonplace for CVÆs to have volunteer work listed in your previous employment history it is also encouraged.

Eva Jobse is from the Netherlands and they have their own legal description of what constitutes as ôemploymentö.

---

Originally by: Kuluskitur

---

Originally by: ViolenTUK

---

In the UK volunteer work is considered employment by law and has its own set of legal rights. Not only is it commonplace for CVÆs to have volunteer work listed in your previous employment history it is also encouraged.

Eva Jobse is from the Netherlands and they have their own legal description of what constitutes as ôemploymentö.

---

Same in the Netherlands. Volunteer work = unpaid employment by the company or organisation, legally speaking. However to add to the confusion, for work to be considered volunteer work it does not require a contract of employment, according to the Dutch law.

In the Netherlands, Eva is thus perfectly entitled to list her volunteer work for CCP as part of her employment history. While Eva had to waive any claims to be a 'regular' CCP employee (because all regular employees are entitled to claim minium wages etc), she was an unpaid CCP employee according to Dutch definitions and law, whenether CCP likes it or not.

That, and it's perfectly normal and even encouraged in the Netherlands to list all volunteer work as part of the employment history (to avoid gaps in the CV). Although the 'employment history' section is called 'werkervaring', literally 'work experience' on the Dutch CV. I'm sure that Eva didn't feel like re-arranging her CV when translating it.

---

Originally by: Kuluskitur

---

Originally by: ViolenTUK

---

In the UK volunteer work is considered employment by law and has its own set of legal rights. Not only is it commonplace for CVÆs to have volunteer work listed in your previous employment history it is also encouraged.

Eva Jobse is from the Netherlands and they have their own legal description of what constitutes as ôemploymentö.

---

Same in the Netherlands. Volunteer work = unpaid employment by the company or organisation, legally speaking. However to add to the confusion, for work to be considered volunteer work it does not require a contract of employment, according to the Dutch law.

In the Netherlands, Eva is thus perfectly entitled to list her volunteer work for CCP as part of her employment history. While Eva had to waive any claims to be a 'regular' CCP employee (because all regular employees are entitled to claim minium wages etc), she was an unpaid CCP employee according to Dutch definitions and law, whenether CCP likes it or not.

That, and it's perfectly normal and even encouraged in the Netherlands to list all volunteer work as part of the employment history (to avoid gaps in the CV). Although the 'employment history' section is called 'werkervaring', literally 'work experience' on the Dutch CV. I'm sure that Eva didn't feel like re-arranging her CV when translating it.

---

Originally by: Olga Kaminski

---

Originally by: Kuluskitur

---

Originally by: ViolenTUK

---

In the UK volunteer work is considered employment by law and has its own set of legal rights. Not only is it commonplace for CVÆs to have volunteer work listed in your previous employment history it is also encouraged.

Eva Jobse is from the Netherlands and they have their own legal description of what constitutes as ôemploymentö.

---

Same in the Netherlands. Volunteer work = unpaid employment by the company or organisation, legally speaking. However to add to the confusion, for work to be considered volunteer work it does not require a contract of employment, according to the Dutch law.

In the Netherlands, Eva is thus perfectly entitled to list her volunteer work for CCP as part of her employment history. While Eva had to waive any claims to be a 'regular' CCP employee (because all regular employees are entitled to claim minium wages etc), she was an unpaid CCP employee according to Dutch definitions and law, whenether CCP likes it or not.

That, and it's perfectly normal and even encouraged in the Netherlands to list all volunteer work as part of the employment history (to avoid gaps in the CV). Although the 'employment history' section is called 'werkervaring', literally 'work experience' on the Dutch CV. I'm sure that Eva didn't feel like re-arranging her CV when translating it.

---

The Dutch revenue service might take exception to your explanation.

Wat is een dienstbetrekking

Regardless this was clearly padding of the C.V. ,as a employer i would applaud people keeping themselves busy and gaining experience by volunteering.

Trying to pass it of as actually being employed by the company just means i will bin your C.V. .

Especially if you are listing things you were not even involved in.

---

Originally by: Kuluskitur

---

(...)waarop de werknemer tegen betaling werk verricht.

The thing you're quoting is for paid employment and like I said, you don't need an employment contract for unpaid employment.

---

Originally by: Fly1

---

Sup ya'll. Thought I would share some interesting things from the being in CSM channel thingy a couple days ago. Enjoy.

-----

[10:42:18] Ankhesentapemkah > So the worse this game does, it opens up more room for other space related games to have breathing room and a better shot at the pie.

[10:42:36] Ankhesentapemkah > Kind of like the one we are working on. ;)

[10:42:52] Ankhesentapemkah > isn't that industrial sabatoge?

[10:43:09] Ankhesentapemkah > Industrial sabotage is too harsh of a word but you get the idea.

-----

This relevant to this thread

---

Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah

---

Originally by: Fly1

---

Sup ya'll. Thought I would share some interesting things from the being in CSM channel thingy a couple days ago. Enjoy.

-----

[10:42:18] Ankhesentapemkah > So the worse this game does, it opens up more room for other space related games to have breathing room and a better shot at the pie.

[10:42:36] Ankhesentapemkah > Kind of like the one we are working on. ;)

[10:42:52] Ankhesentapemkah > isn't that industrial sabatoge?

[10:43:09] Ankhesentapemkah > Industrial sabotage is too harsh of a word but you get the idea.

-----

This relevant to this thread

---

False logs. I don't use the "shot at the pie" expression nor do I use the ;) smiley like that. Try harder when trying to slander.

---

Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah

---

Originally by: Fly1

---

Sup ya'll. Thought I would share some interesting things from the being in CSM channel thingy a couple days ago. Enjoy.

-----

[10:42:18] Ankhesentapemkah > So the worse this game does, it opens up more room for other space related games to have breathing room and a better shot at the pie.

[10:42:36] Ankhesentapemkah > Kind of like the one we are working on. ;)

[10:42:52] Ankhesentapemkah > isn't that industrial sabatoge?

[10:43:09] Ankhesentapemkah > Industrial sabotage is too harsh of a word but you get the idea.

-----

This relevant to this thread

---

False logs. I don't use the "shot at the pie" expression nor do I use the ;) smiley like that. Try harder when trying to slander.

---

Originally by: Sokratesz

---

I just felt like sharing this:

[15:33:37] Ankhesentapemkah > Funny, I spoke with a law student and slandering me on the forums is actually a violation of dutch law and punishable with a maximum of 6 months of jailtime.
[15:33:46] Ankhesentapemkah > despite the forums not being dutch.
[15:34:46] Ankhesentapemkah > Lets see if I can sue some people.


Serious Business.

---

Originally by: Sokratesz

---

I just felt like sharing this:

[15:33:37] Ankhesentapemkah > Funny, I spoke with a law student and slandering me on the forums is actually a violation of dutch law and punishable with a maximum of 6 months of jailtime.
[15:33:46] Ankhesentapemkah > despite the forums not being dutch.
[15:34:46] Ankhesentapemkah > Lets see if I can sue some people.


Serious Business.

---

Originally by: Sokratesz

---

I just felt like sharing this:

[15:33:37] Ankhesentapemkah > Funny, I spoke with a law student and slandering me on the forums is actually a violation of dutch law and punishable with a maximum of 6 months of jailtime.
[15:33:46] Ankhesentapemkah > despite the forums not being dutch.
[15:34:46] Ankhesentapemkah > Lets see if I can sue some people.


Serious Business.

---

Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah

---

Originally by: Larkonis Trassler

---

As major features in the next expansion, I'd love to see a full UI revamp, dynamically generated missions, and a factional warfare overhaul.

---

I read through many of the changes you propose for FW. I tend to agree that the npc's (if they are going to exist in fw) should be balanced and I guess it would be ok to have corps that are in an alliance join fw. The other ideas you posted seem to be bug and exploit fixes for faction war.
Are these what you mean by an overhaul? Or do you mean something bigger?
What do you think about the idea of removing npcs from faction war plexes and simply notifying the player militias when they are entered so they can defend them if they want?

The npcs would stay in missions of course but the occupancy effecting plexes would have no npcs. There could be a separate channel that reports what plexes are being occupied (and perhaps by whom and ship types)

Also sometimes in some of your threads the idea of giving occupancy more meaning comes up. Do you think that is a good idea? If so what should be done?

Originally by: Adingo Ate'mybaby

---

Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah

---

False logs. I don't use the "shot at the pie" expression nor do I use the ;) smiley like that. Try harder when trying to slander.

---

So this you deny, but you don't dispute the logs where you are essentially taking the **** out of someone's autistic child? Brilliant.

---

Originally by: Cearain

---

I would hope she apologized for that one.

---

Originally by: Boomershoot

---

I was commisioned this picture, don't get mad at me

---

Originally by: Boomershoot

---

I was commisioned this picture, don't get mad at me

---

Originally by: Boomershoot

---

I was commisioned this picture, don't get mad at me

---

Originally by: Miyamoto Isoruku

---

It may interest those who have been following this thread that it is now the stated position of the EVE Tribune that Ankhesentapemkah is an unsuitable candidate for the Council of Stellar Management. You can read my editorial explaining our reasons for taking this decision here. You can find a separate forum thread here.

---

Originally by: Boomershoot

---

I was commisioned this picture, don't get mad at me

---