| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
17
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 11:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. |

Shalua Rui
FEROX AQUILA
110
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 11:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
If you mean by "veteran", bored with a game they should have quit some time ago, then I agree.^^ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 |

Kryss Darkdust
The Skulls
46
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 11:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
I like the attitude, like the balls and agree with the sentiment. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1226
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 11:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
All this moaning about 'gate camping' is hillarious.
You know people have to use them, so thats a great place to catch targets My homeboys tried to warn me But that butt you got makes me so horny |

Aina Sasaki
Red Core Paradigm Shift Alliance
401
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 11:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kryss Darkdust wrote:I like the attitude, like the balls and agree with the sentiment.
I second that. - Rei |

Taranius De Consolville
Lost Dawn Chaos Corrosive.
140
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 11:58:00 -
[6] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
Agreed
100%
|

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
174
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 11:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Even with these changes pirates will still be able to catch you.
Don't get me wrong, I think people are overreacting. You only need 30 seconds to kill a target and warp back to your safe spot. |

Rordan D'Kherr
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
37
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
that actually gets a +1
|

Cede Forster
EVE University Ivy League
11
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
but it is easier because most people have to go through the gate and also piracy isnt supposed to be hard, it is supposed to be borring and waiting for people, okay?  |

Sexy Cakes
Poasting
21
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
Please keep discussions about the CSM 7 Summer meeting minutes in the appropriate place. Having feedback in one place is much more productive and will allow for better discussions than having the feedback scattered all over our forums.
|

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
361
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:04:00 -
[11] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then?
You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
411
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:05:00 -
[12] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:Even with these changes pirates will still be able to catch you.
Don't get me wrong, I think people are overreacting. You only need 30 seconds to kill a target and warp back to your safe spot. You don't mean that if people actually do something other than sit still it will not be that big a problem? Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Mystic Lore Arcanium
Red-Five
19
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:08:00 -
[13] - Quote
Incredible Stupidity - Gate Camps are the LOGICAL first line of defense if you wish to protect assets, camping a gate doesn't automatically make you a "pirate". If you were intent upon defending your home from an outside threat, I'm willing to bet you would stake out the FRONT DOOR. Why let the intruder into your home to wander threw the kitchen and bedroom before "hunting them down"? I know where to find them - at the Gate...
If my Corp is running sigs or mining in lowsec, you can bet that we WILL HAVE a gate camp up to defend our assets. |

Pak Narhoo
Knights of Kador
642
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp.
How about... belts? POCO's, POS's, WH entrance/ exits, anomalies, complexes, missions? You know, the more I think about it the more I feel the OP is right.
If you guys actually would get your sticky rear OFF those gates you probably had more targets to pew with. 
Hi, I'm CCP Arrow, I screwed up the.. ummm... |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
412
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:16:00 -
[15] - Quote
Mystic Lore Arcanium wrote:Incredible Stupidity - Gate Camps are the LOGICAL first line of defense if you wish to protect assets, camping a gate doesn't automatically make you a "pirate". If you were intent upon defending your home from an outside threat, I'm willing to bet you would stake out the FRONT DOOR. Why let the intruder into your home to wander threw the kitchen and bedroom before "hunting them down"? I know where to find them - at the Gate...
If my Corp is running sigs or mining in lowsec, you can bet that we WILL HAVE a gate camp up to defend our assets. If you want the whole space to be yours, go claim Sov in Null sec, that is what it is for.
Lo-sec is part of Empire space, you are in Empire territory and should expect gate guns to take action if you act like a pirate. To use a similar analogy, you are trying to guard your wallet you left in a hotel safe by killing everyone who comes into the hotel and then not expecting security or the cops to blow your head off for it. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Kuehnelt
Devoid Privateering
167
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:20:00 -
[16] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates
Apart from FW and reinforcing structures, there are only carebear activities off of gates in lowsec. PI, mining, ratting, cosmic anoms, cosmic signatures, missions; people that do these in lowsec know how to do them in lowsec, they'll see you enter local, they'll see you/your probes on dscan, they'll have ages and ages to avoid combat - which is what they'll certainly do, because they're not likely to be in a pvp ship for these activities.
So hunting like a "REAL pirate" is largely a waste of time. And even if you found one, gosh, it'd only be the same kind of 'bad' pvp that you scorn in this post of yours. If you're roaming for a fight, and if what you see of a system's inhabitants is that they're probably carebearing, then you're better off continuing to roam.
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:You turds
Awfully nasty language. I'll have some capital letters for you. People who live in lowsec, and who do not camp in one of the extremely few, extremely famous systems which have smartbombing battleships and such on gates, who go around in gangs of various sizes looking for fights more exciting than killing a a lone T1 rifter, these people ALSO FIGHT ON GATES.
Kil2 starts in Jita and flies solo to whatever far-flung corner of nullsec after studying the map for a bit; you can watch his streams where he does this, you can watch the videos he makes of his fights. Go watch a few of them. Spoiler: THERE ARE A LOT OF FIGHTS ON GATES.
BECAUSE FIGHTS ARE LARGELY ON GATES IN EVE.
SOME REASONS ARE OUTLINED ABOVE; IT REALLY HAS LITTLE TO DO WITH STATIONARY PIRATES IN A HANDFUL OF SYSTEMS. |

Tara Read
The Generic Pirate Corporation Fusion.
62
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:21:00 -
[17] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
Sigh.... You see it's really not that simple and I admire your attitude and agree. The underlying issue really is the "hunt" you speak of. Targets in Low Sec are becoming more and more scarce. With less interest in the systems you hunt in where are said targets?
The underlying issue isn't people camping gates (even though a majority of people only do that) it really is the problem of having little to no targets whatsoever.
Many corps and alliances in low actually go to null to hunt only to find themselves quickly out manned and outgunned which leaves a bitter taste in peoples mouths. You really want to get those pussies off the gates? Give them a big juicy mouse to catch. |

Hicksimus
Hyperion Corporation
125
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:29:00 -
[18] - Quote
Hi, I can tell you don't spend much time in lowsec so I'll point out a few flaws in your logic.
There isn't much worth doing in lowsec space so the odds of finding a random person ready to die is much...MUCH! lower
What is worth doing must be probed down AND has acceleration gates, I've only caught one person who was maybe not watching D-scan and he was 85km away so he left.
Most people only use lowsec for moon mining and moving assets to and from nullsec, if they aren't inside a death star or in a station they are on a gate. So how do you propose that we kill them if they are only ever near gates and stations and towers that broke ass pirates cannot afford to attack?
Edit: BTW I only live in low on occasion and I always end up leaving because there is 10x as much PvP to be had in nullsec, 10x as much income per hour in nullsec, and in nullsec my sec status can only go up. Things I have realized from the EvE forums: Many people beleive cost means money and only money If you use it then it needs a buff. -áIf you don't use it then it needs to be nerfed. |

Vagilicious
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
31
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:40:00 -
[19] - Quote
I agree with this 100%.
When I first started playing it took me a while to pluck up the courage to venture into Lowsec. When I did I encountered my first gate camp, did the newb thing and panicked, and died pretty much instantly.
But I stuck at it. I learned, adapted and eventually figured out how to pass them, only to find the areas beyond pretty much deserted.
I got my first decent fight at a belt - I died quickly (again) but the adrenaline rush, my heart pounding, was what really made it for me.
I personally think that making it more difficult to camp on a gate is a good thing. The biggest barrier for new players is jumping through and dying instantly. That, coupled with the horror stories of how Lowsec is a death trap is enough to put most of them off from venturing outside Hisec.
IMO if Lowsec appeared to be safer - at least on entering - it might actually encourage newer players to take a bit more of a risk, possibly risk slipping a mining or mission running ship in with the thought of making bigger iskies.
Of course they'd more than likely get their ships popped but they'd at least be there. Maybe some would still give up, but I'm betting that a lot more would experience that same rush and try to adapt, learn new techniques to survive, and hopefully start to populate Lowsec.
Now more than ever I think CCP needs to improve new player retention, and I think this is a step in the right direction.
|

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
361
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:41:00 -
[20] - Quote
Pak Narhoo wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp. How about... belts? POCO's, POS's, WH entrance/ exits, anomalies, complexes, missions? You know, the more I think about it the more I feel the OP is right. If you guys actually would get your sticky rear OFF those gates you probably had more targets to pew with. 
Do you understand what pirates are? They don't sit by an asteroid hoping that someone might come along. They sit by gates because 90% of people will enter the system through the gates.
I'm not a pirate, i'm actually affiliated with anti-pirate groups so don't misunderstand where i'm coming from here, but I feel that low sec should be policed by the players.
After a pirate group has ganked that noob in a rifter, do you think they are going to stick around for a good fight with an anti-pirate group while also taking massive amounts of gate gun fire? I think people will now only attack ships they know they can take out in a few seconds and then doc/pos up. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. Comic Mischief
886
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:42:00 -
[21] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:Even with these changes pirates will still be able to catch you.
Don't get me wrong, I think people are overreacting. You only need 30 seconds to kill a target and warp back to your safe spot. I have to agree with this. These changes actually make it easier to catch a target at a gate camp. You will be able to use a small fast tackler now, a ship that would be killed immediately by a gate gun given the present gate guns. After the change that fast tackle will be able to do its job and bug out. The heavy tackle/dps ships then finish the job and bug out.
Result: Many ships that would have slipped through the gate camp will now get caught. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 13:16:00 -
[22] - Quote
AFK Mining =/= AFK Gatecamping |
|

ISD TYPE40
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
62

|
Posted - 2012.08.03 13:18:00 -
[23] - Quote
Thread cleaned of troll posting. Please post responsibly, thank you - ISD Type40. ISD Type40 Ensign Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc Elysian Empire
190
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 13:19:00 -
[24] - Quote
I propose some galaxy wide catastrophe that destroys the gates (and local along with it) and leaves nothing but wormholes connecting the systems
Everything would be so much better. |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 13:24:00 -
[25] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Pak Narhoo wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp. How about... belts? POCO's, POS's, WH entrance/ exits, anomalies, complexes, missions? You know, the more I think about it the more I feel the OP is right. If you guys actually would get your sticky rear OFF those gates you probably had more targets to pew with.  Do you understand what pirates are? They don't sit by an asteroid hoping that someone might come along. They sit by gates because 90% of people will enter the system through the gates. I'm not a pirate, i'm actually affiliated with anti-pirate groups so don't misunderstand where i'm coming from here, but I feel that low sec should be policed by the players. After a pirate group has ganked that noob in a rifter, do you think they are going to stick around for a good fight with an anti-pirate group while also taking massive amounts of gate gun fire? I think people will now only attack ships they know they can take out in a few seconds and then doc/pos up.
I don't consider myself a pirate, per se. I'm a mission runner and explorer. My Corporation just recently moved to Low Sec. To ensure that I felt like my new home felt "safe" I actively hunted people out on d-scan and went after them. I didn't sit on a gate hoping to poon someone that was passing through.
This is akin to those idiots that sat in front of an instance portal in WoW killing lvl 30's trying to get into SM. It's just silly and actually kind of a ***** move.
You have a d-scan. Use it. Get off gates. No one is impressed. |

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks The Marmite Collective
352
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 14:12:00 -
[26] - Quote
Okay, since I'm a highsec ******* and not a lowsec *******, I won't speak to that bit, but there's a common argument that I see that I'd like to address for a second if you'll indulge me.
I often get told that if I were a real pvper I wouldn't: - dec people potentially less skilled or more poorly equipped than me - spy - safari - scam or lie - logon trap - corp hop (now dead RIP) - use neutral logi (I generally don't, but that's another discussion) - etc.
The etc can be very broad, too. I once got accused of fighting cheap because I used a command ship in highsec. And by that I don't mean that I got called out for using an off-grid booster, but apparently fighting from an Absolution is cheating somehow.
Really, dudes? You honestly expect people to throw away competitive advantages? In everything you do, you're up against someone else, directly or indirectly. Do you think all your competition is also throwing away these advantages? Does your sense of e-honour have you in such an incredible stranglehold? I mean, I get it, I harbor some shreds of e-honour I have trouble letting go of too, but this isn't pistols at dawn. This is a shanking in a prison shower.
If we were playing tag, would you demand that everyone hop on one foot? If we were playing chess, would you demand everyone do it blind drunk? Are you living in such a Harrison Bergeron world that you really want to bring the whole game down to the lowest common denominator? |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
361
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 14:14:00 -
[27] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Pak Narhoo wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp. How about... belts? POCO's, POS's, WH entrance/ exits, anomalies, complexes, missions? You know, the more I think about it the more I feel the OP is right. If you guys actually would get your sticky rear OFF those gates you probably had more targets to pew with.  Do you understand what pirates are? They don't sit by an asteroid hoping that someone might come along. They sit by gates because 90% of people will enter the system through the gates. I'm not a pirate, i'm actually affiliated with anti-pirate groups so don't misunderstand where i'm coming from here, but I feel that low sec should be policed by the players. After a pirate group has ganked that noob in a rifter, do you think they are going to stick around for a good fight with an anti-pirate group while also taking massive amounts of gate gun fire? I think people will now only attack ships they know they can take out in a few seconds and then doc/pos up. I don't consider myself a pirate, per se. I'm a mission runner and explorer. My Corporation just recently moved to Low Sec. To ensure that I felt like my new home felt "safe" I actively hunted people out on d-scan and went after them. I didn't sit on a gate hoping to poon someone that was passing through. This is akin to those idiots that sat in front of an instance portal in WoW killing lvl 30's trying to get into SM. It's just silly and actually kind of a ***** move. You have a d-scan. Use it. Get off gates. No one is impressed.
Just because you done like the way someone else plays doesn't mean it isn't a legit strategy. Gate camping has always been a part of eve and it always should be. It's even a tactic used in the novels and i bet there are a bunch of players that get a buzz from escaping gate camps as they type "fail" into local. 
But i am just playing devils advocate here and i have looked into the proposed change in detail. Will it be impossible to tank gate guns now or will it be manageable providing you have enough logi, resulting in an increase of blob warfare? |

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
342
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 14:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:" I actively hunted people out on d-scan and went after them. I didn't sit on a gate hoping to poon someone that was passing through.
This is akin to those idiots that sat in front of an instance portal in WoW killing lvl 30's trying to get into SM. It's just silly and actually kind of a ***** move.
You have a d-scan. Use it. Get off gates. No one is impressed.
Looking at your stats on BC you have three kills in low-sec of wich a 2vs1 , a 10v1 and to top it off a 20vs1 . I think the people you are adressing will also not be impressed either as they rarely have a 10 man gang let alone a 20 man gang.
I'd suggest trying low-sec piracy with 1 or 2 friends for a month and not using the gates for your kills.I bet you'll be bored before the 2nd week is over because of lack of targets.
The gates is not the problem , it's the enviremont that needs to be adressed as it has had that need for year upon year upon year now. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
361
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 14:23:00 -
[29] - Quote
flakeys wrote: The gates is not the problem , it's the enviremont that needs to be adressed as it has had that need for year upon year upon year now.
This.
Low sec should be a place that high sec dwellers aspire to be but why bother when you can get rich from lvl 4's?
Don't get me started on FW. CCP apparently think their recent changes to the FW system system was good enough... Please  |

Karl Planck
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
194
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 14:33:00 -
[30] - Quote
just cant resist. I largely camp now because i ran out of ppl that would fight me. Ironically i don't camp the gate.
To all everyone concerned over the fairness involving the H/O disqualification https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=113351&find=unread |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks The Marmite Collective
2105
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 14:34:00 -
[31] - Quote
Fights happen on gates because contact happens on gates. The Skunkworks is recruiting. -áhttps://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1540711#post1540711 |

Seishi Maru
doMAL S.A.
37
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 14:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
Pak Narhoo wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp. How about... belts? POCO's, POS's, WH entrance/ exits, anomalies, complexes, missions? You know, the more I think about it the more I feel the OP is right. If you guys actually would get your sticky rear OFF those gates you probably had more targets to pew with. 
you mean .. places that are completely empty in low sec except for a few seconds every day?
There is not enough activity in low sec for other places to have PVP. The logical choice would be to make low sec belts spawn Battleship sized rats so people would go there t make REAL isk. That alone would skew a lot of the attention from gates and into the belts |

Seishi Maru
doMAL S.A.
37
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 14:53:00 -
[33] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:flakeys wrote: The gates is not the problem , it's the enviremont that needs to be adressed as it has had that need for year upon year upon year now.
This. Low sec should be a place that high sec dwellers aspire to be but why bother when you can get rich from lvl 4's? Don't get me started on FW. CCP apparently think their recent changes to the FW system system was good enough... Please 
well .. was SOMETHIGN at least:P In fact FW made a lot for low sec, increase commerce in low sec and the rpesence of a strong group (the militias) make some zones less inhabited by large static pirate activities. |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
825
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 14:56:00 -
[34] - Quote
the main reason why i am in FW is:
1) docking rights -> no station games 2) war -> no gate guns/gcc 3) plexes -> good for solo/small scale pvp
its like avoiding Eve's main game design issues by joining FW ;) a eve-style bounty system https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=359105 You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
363
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 14:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
Seishi Maru wrote: well .. was SOMETHIGN at least:P In fact FW made a lot for low sec, increase commerce in low sec and the rpesence of a strong group (the militias) make some zones less inhabited by large static pirate activities.
I guess so... I just want to be able to take over Amarr low sec for the Republic. |

Karl Planck
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
195
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 15:01:00 -
[36] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Pak Narhoo wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp. How about... belts? POCO's, POS's, WH entrance/ exits, anomalies, complexes, missions? You know, the more I think about it the more I feel the OP is right. If you guys actually would get your sticky rear OFF those gates you probably had more targets to pew with.  Do you understand what pirates are? They don't sit by an asteroid hoping that someone might come along. They sit by gates because 90% of people will enter the system through the gates. I'm not a pirate, i'm actually affiliated with anti-pirate groups so don't misunderstand where i'm coming from here, but I feel that low sec should be policed by the players. After a pirate group has ganked that noob in a rifter, do you think they are going to stick around for a good fight with an anti-pirate group while also taking massive amounts of gate gun fire? I think people will now only attack ships they know they can take out in a few seconds and then doc/pos up. I don't consider myself a pirate, per se. I'm a mission runner and explorer. My Corporation just recently moved to Low Sec. To ensure that I felt like my new home felt "safe" I actively hunted people out on d-scan and went after them. I didn't sit on a gate hoping to poon someone that was passing through. This is akin to those idiots that sat in front of an instance portal in WoW killing lvl 30's trying to get into SM. It's just silly and actually kind of a ***** move. You have a d-scan. Use it. Get off gates. No one is impressed.
lol you have 6 kills and one of them is in lowsec, mail me in a year and let me know how this goes for you
To all everyone concerned over the fairness involving the H/O disqualification https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=113351&find=unread |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
315
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 15:10:00 -
[37] - Quote
gates exist to cause pvp |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
315
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 15:11:00 -
[38] - Quote
literally that is their purpose, to force people into specific areas so you know where you can find people to shoot |

Pinstar Colton
Sweet Asteroid Acres
211
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 15:14:00 -
[39] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Fights happen on gates because contact happens on gates.
Gates have the element of surprise (If the traveler doesn't have forward scouts) AND they must align and warp from a dead stop after exiting a gate (unlike a station, where you can instawarp with the proper bookmark). Gates are literally the only place a pirate can even attempt to take down a target who is merely traveling through the system.
The whole concept of piracy (In the oldschool naval sense) is to catch a ship going from point A to point B and steal its loot. Given EVE game mechanics, that is literally the only choice pirates have.
In the cat-and-mouse game that is low sec, there is no shame in learning to be a better mouse. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks The Marmite Collective
2108
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 15:18:00 -
[40] - Quote
Pinstar Colton wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Fights happen on gates because contact happens on gates. Gates have the element of surprise (If the traveler doesn't have forward scouts) AND they must align and warp from a dead stop after exiting a gate (unlike a station, where you can instawarp with the proper bookmark). Gates are literally the only place a pirate can even attempt to take down a target who is merely traveling through the system. The whole concept of piracy (In the oldschool naval sense) is to catch a ship going from point A to point B and steal its loot. Given EVE game mechanics, that is literally the only choice pirates have.
Even discounting gate camps, suppose you have two wandering gangs looking for PVP. Where will they be most likely to meet? At a random celestial, or at a gate as they travel?
Where are they most likely to actually engage in a fight? Hint: the smaller/weaker gang is most likely going to avoid the fight if they can, because nobody wants to pointlessly lose a dozen ships to a more powerful enemy. The only way you're going to force a fight from them is catching them on a gate. Anywhere else and they are far more likely to simply run. The Skunkworks is recruiting. -áhttps://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1540711#post1540711 |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
39
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 15:20:00 -
[41] - Quote
flakeys wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:" I actively hunted people out on d-scan and went after them. I didn't sit on a gate hoping to poon someone that was passing through.
This is akin to those idiots that sat in front of an instance portal in WoW killing lvl 30's trying to get into SM. It's just silly and actually kind of a ***** move.
You have a d-scan. Use it. Get off gates. No one is impressed. Looking at your stats on BC you have three kills in low-sec of wich a 2vs1 , a 10v1 and to top it off a 20vs1 . I think the people you are adressing will also not be impressed either as they rarely have a 10 man gang let alone a 20 man gang. I'd suggest trying low-sec piracy with 1 or 2 friends for a month and not using the gates for your kills.I bet you'll be bored before the 2nd week is over because of lack of targets. The gates is not the problem , it's the enviremont that needs to be adressed as it has had that need for year upon year upon year now.
The 2v1 was against 2 T2 ships....at a gate.
Applaud me? |

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp Black Thorne Alliance
325
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 15:27:00 -
[42] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp.
Form fleet, burn up a POS? Form fleet, burn up a POCO? Thats what I'd be doing if I wanted to get into a fight. Eventually someone will respond.
And before you whine about grinding structures. HTFU. Want a curb stomp battle, gotta find a curb. 'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you.
~I fly spaceships~ |

yopparai
ASTARTES CORP Hashashin Cartel
963
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 15:48:00 -
[43] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:AFK Mining =/= AFK Gatecamping
Nope, at least with afk mining you gain something (ore). The only thing you can gain from afk gatecamping is a lossmail.
Yopp |

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
684
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 15:55:00 -
[44] - Quote
Would be interesting to see some CCP stats on how much % of PvP in the various securities that happen, where. At gates, stations, moons/POS, belt, etc. I am willing to bet that the top 2 % spots for PvP in both low and null is gates and moons. And guess what, moons will have a vast, vast impact on the future sec status if Greyskales/CSM get this crazy idea through. Usually at least one party that fight on a POS will eat GCC, and if you are logistic on lowsec POS fights (I have been a number of times), you can easily drop from +5 to -10 sec in just one fight. How do you plan for me to go home now that gates will fire on me just for sitting near them, without even aggressing?
Being below -5 just mean you can't travel anywhere without cyno. Great idea. And it also removes the two biggest places you'd be fighting at, gates, and POS, woohoo. Not that it matters, who'd fight in belts, custom offices, plexes etc if you risk dropping sec, then you can't travel home anyway?  shiptoastin' liek a baws |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
363
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 16:08:00 -
[45] - Quote
IGNATIUS HOOD wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp. Form fleet, burn up a POS? Form fleet, burn up a POCO? Thats what I'd be doing if I wanted to get into a fight. Eventually someone will respond. And before you whine about grinding structures. HTFU. Want a curb stomp battle, gotta find a curb.
Because you just click your fingers and you've destroyed a POS... Oh wait, i have to come back in 1 day 16 hours only to be hot dropped by 5 random corps? 
I do shoot structures now and again but it's boring as **** most of the time and i'd pick unpredictable gate fights anytime. |

Sarik Olecar
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
42
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 16:09:00 -
[46] - Quote
Misanth wrote:Would be interesting to see some CCP stats on how much % of PvP in the various securities that happen, where. At gates, stations, moons/POS, belt, etc. I am willing to bet that the top 2 % spots for PvP in both low and null is gates and moons. And guess what, moons will have a vast, vast impact on the future sec status if Greyskales/CSM get this crazy idea through. Usually at least one party that fight on a POS will eat GCC, and if you are logistic on lowsec POS fights (I have been a number of times), you can easily drop from +5 to -10 sec in just one fight. How do you plan for me to go home now that gates will fire on me just for sitting near them, without even aggressing? Being below -5 just mean you can't travel anywhere without cyno. Great idea. And it also removes the two biggest places you'd be fighting at, gates, and POS, woohoo. Not that it matters, who'd fight in belts, custom offices, plexes etc if you risk dropping sec, then you can't travel home anyway? 
Because the new gate guns will one-hit everything as soon as you load grid, right? |

Shukuzen Kiraa
Neurodyne
191
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 16:09:00 -
[47] - Quote
Kryss Darkdust wrote:I like the attitude, like the balls and agree with the sentiment.
This! ^^ |

XxRTEKxX
Fenrir's Dogs of War Union 0f Revolution
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 17:49:00 -
[48] - Quote
Vagilicious wrote:I agree with this 100%.
When I first started playing it took me a while to pluck up the courage to venture into Lowsec. When I did I encountered my first gate camp, did the newb thing and panicked, and died pretty much instantly.
But I stuck at it. I learned, adapted and eventually figured out how to pass them, only to find the areas beyond pretty much deserted.
I got my first decent fight at a belt - I died quickly (again) but the adrenaline rush, my heart pounding, was what really made it for me.
I personally think that making it more difficult to camp on a gate is a good thing. The biggest barrier for new players is jumping through and dying instantly. That, coupled with the horror stories of how Lowsec is a death trap is enough to put most of them off from venturing outside Hisec.
IMO if Lowsec appeared to be safer - at least on entering - it might actually encourage newer players to take a bit more of a risk, possibly risk slipping a mining or mission running ship in with the thought of making bigger iskies.
Of course they'd more than likely get their ships popped but they'd at least be there. Maybe some would still give up, but I'm betting that a lot more would experience that same rush and try to adapt, learn new techniques to survive, and hopefully start to populate Lowsec.
Now more than ever I think CCP needs to improve new player retention, and I think this is a step in the right direction.
Gate camps were the reason I stayed out of ls for so long. Id be up for more powerful gateguns to push pilots to fight off gates. Downside would be traveling through lowsec would be far easier. I do wish pvp wasn't so often done at gates. Even in highsec wars its usually at gates, and stations where camping happens.
Maybe ccp will come up with a good solution to more encourage combat off gates and stations.
|

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations Shaktipat Revelators
362
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 17:52:00 -
[49] - Quote
XxRTEKxX wrote:
Gate camps were the reason I stayed out of ls for so long. Id be up for more powerful gateguns to push pilots to fight off gates. Downside would be traveling through lowsec would be far easier. I do wish pvp wasn't so often done at gates. Even in highsec wars its usually at gates, and stations where camping happens.
Maybe ccp will come up with a good solution to more encourage combat off gates and stations.
There is a reason for this. The reason is that combat happens where people are. People are not at belt 1, or at planet V, they are at the gates, or the stations. |

XxRTEKxX
Fenrir's Dogs of War Union 0f Revolution
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 17:57:00 -
[50] - Quote
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:XxRTEKxX wrote:
Gate camps were the reason I stayed out of ls for so long. Id be up for more powerful gateguns to push pilots to fight off gates. Downside would be traveling through lowsec would be far easier. I do wish pvp wasn't so often done at gates. Even in highsec wars its usually at gates, and stations where camping happens.
Maybe ccp will come up with a good solution to more encourage combat off gates and stations.
There is a reason for this. The reason is that combat happens where people are. People are not at belt 1, or at planet V, they are at the gates, or the stations.
I agree that is the reason people generally fight on gates. However, why should it always be that way? Why not add in factors to either encourage pilots to be in belts, at planets etc?
|

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
87
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 17:58:00 -
[51] - Quote
It's amazing how the rest of the game thinks in a different way than I do. I have absolutely no sense of attachment or fear of loss or risk. If I lose a ship, I lose several millions sure, then I have to buy a new clone and fit a new ship, but big ******* deal?
Are all of these pirates seriously running around with pods and ships they can't afford to lose? What's wrong with you people. Stop being girly-men. Engage your target and fight to the death. If you lose your officer-fit rifter and 10b pod, that's your dumb-ass mistake not mine. |

Vagilicious
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 18:02:00 -
[52] - Quote
Maybe it's just me, but I don't think that a gate camp counts as combat. It's more like shooting fish in a barrel as a means to pad a killboard, at least till the victim gains experience in avoiding them.
IMO true combat is when the victim has a chance to shoot back. Jumping through and being popped by ships 200km away isn't a lot of fun, although when you do learn to evade them it can cause rage and hilarity  |

Lyron-Baktos
Selective Pressure Rote Kapelle
287
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 18:06:00 -
[53] - Quote
confirming that hi-sec gate camping is the ultimate faggotry in Eve On holiday. -áIn some other world. Where the music of the radio was a labyrinth of sonorous colours. To a bright centre of absolute convicton where the dripping patchouli was more than scent, It was a sun-á |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
1733
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 18:07:00 -
[54] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
Hi, I spend a lot of time sitting at zero at Amamake Belt 3-1 (top belt) - though frankly that only works out for me because Amamake is a well known PVP hot spot. I refuse to camp the Oso gate and damn sure refuse to do it with Orca support. When I roam, I'd say that 90% of the fights happen at gates - not because either party is gate camping but simply because that's where the people are.
I like your viewpoint and spunkiness, but you're dreadfully naive. As someone who enjoys good fights far more than gate camps, I can say with some certainty that you're simply deluded. Belt piracy died out years ago with the demise of belt ratting, and even killing mission runners is no fun.
I really don't want carebears in low sec. High sec and null sec can keep them. Give me your PVPers.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Ajit Kumar Bhattacharya
Metaphysical Utopian Society Explorations
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 18:09:00 -
[55] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
Damn straight. |

Mocam
EVE University Ivy League
159
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 19:01:00 -
[56] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:... Really, dudes? You honestly expect people to throw away competitive advantages? In everything you do, you're up against someone else, directly or indirectly. Do you think all your competition is also throwing away these advantages? Does your sense of e-honour have you in such an incredible stranglehold? I mean, I get it, I harbor some shreds of e-honour I have trouble letting go of too, but this isn't pistols at dawn. This is a shanking in a prison shower.
No I don't expect people to throw away competitive advantages. I do expect game mechanics that enable or disable certain types of behavior and we have seen such changes occur for a very long time in the game. It might be held that having loaded dice for playing craps is a "competitive advantage" but that tends to draw a bit of angst from gamblers just as certain "competitive advantages" in EVE also tend to draw displeasure.
"Adapt or die" - that goes for your "competitive advantages" as well as anything else. To those that don't like the changes -- it's their turn to adapt instead of expecting everyone else to do so for THEIR convenience and ease.
When "the victims" need a bit more coverage, things change to keep them around - otherwise your victimizers won't have targets. They just need to adapt and all the whines are simply the squealing of old unchanging ways preparing to change like gears that haven't had to move in a long time. It's a bit amusing when looked at this way. |

Bunnie Hop
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
334
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 19:08:00 -
[57] - Quote
High and Low sec gates should equip a module which disrupts target locking within a certain range of it, allowing transient ships a chance to go to warp. Let the fights take place elsewhere, that will increase the flow into Low Sec. Null should have no such thing though. |

Shizuken
Venerated Stars
77
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 19:14:00 -
[58] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:All this moaning about 'gate camping' is hillarious.
You know people have to use them, so thats a great place to catch targets
That is the problem. Travel in this game needs to work more like star trek, set a course and speed, and arrive in a certain amount of time. You could still interdict warp travel but the natural choke points of gates would disappear.
Plus it would make actual scanning more relevant and system defense woukd not rely solely on local chat to tell you that enemies are afoot.
Local chat and stargates are lame holdovers from early low budget game design. |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
52
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:02:00 -
[59] - Quote
I, for one, applaud the new changes. Should force some of you Greenbeards into being Blackbeards. |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
603
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:08:00 -
[60] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:Even with these changes pirates will still be able to catch you.
Don't get me wrong, I think people are overreacting. You only need 30 seconds to kill a target and warp back to your safe spot.
Changes are not supposed to make it so pirates can't do their favourite activity, changes are done to save the pigs from themselves being so dumb they can't do anything else than camp gates for hours ruining the sandbox with no consequence. This was against the principle of the sandbox, the fact an action will bring de appropriate consequence is not wasting the sand box, it's just making good players just better and the stupid pigs cry a little more because no one is giving them a hand any more. brb |

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations Shaktipat Revelators
362
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:09:00 -
[61] - Quote
XxRTEKxX wrote:Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:XxRTEKxX wrote:
Gate camps were the reason I stayed out of ls for so long. Id be up for more powerful gateguns to push pilots to fight off gates. Downside would be traveling through lowsec would be far easier. I do wish pvp wasn't so often done at gates. Even in highsec wars its usually at gates, and stations where camping happens.
Maybe ccp will come up with a good solution to more encourage combat off gates and stations.
There is a reason for this. The reason is that combat happens where people are. People are not at belt 1, or at planet V, they are at the gates, or the stations. I agree that is the reason people generally fight on gates. However, why should it always be that way? Why not add in factors to either encourage pilots to be in belts, at planets etc?
If there are actual reasons? Great! As it stands, when I am roaming I am not looking to do "something else". Im there to fight. What usually ends up happening is either everyone docks up when we come around, or we crash into an enemy fleet. At a gate. Usually my side takes GCC because someone's got to.
Most fights take place at gates and stations because these are the natural chokepoints in space. That is why gates are there, to make certain places in the systems where people are much more likely to end up. Making it so that those of us who live out here can't find natural fights is going to drive a lot of us out.
And no, agreeing to fight at planet 1 or belt V or whatever is not a natural fight. That sort of arena-style PvP has absolutely no interest to me. I like the risk that I am going to jump into a much bigger gang than the one I am in, but I'm not stupid enough to do it on purpose. |

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
343
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:09:00 -
[62] - Quote
Proletariat Tingtango wrote:It's amazing how the rest of the game thinks in a different way than I do. I have absolutely no sense of attachment or fear of loss or risk. If I lose a ship, I lose several millions sure, then I have to buy a new clone and fit a new ship, but big ******* deal?
Are all of these pirates seriously running around with pods and ships they can't afford to lose? What's wrong with you people. Stop being girly-men. Engage your target and fight to the death. If you lose your officer-fit rifter and 10b pod, that's your dumb-ass mistake not mine.
So , as with the last null guy who showed the way to small gang piracy i'll just burst the bubble of this char too.
Battleclinic shows 119 kills of wich the largest portion was 50 to 200+ people on the killmail and the smallest i believe was a dramkill with 3 people. Not one single kill on your name , not even for a damn cyno kessie.
Regarding how you don't mind loosing crap as you say: 33 losses of wich the most expensive is a blackbird - you know the 5 mille isk ship - and all the rest are rifters and pods.
Now if you want to come in here and show the pirates how to properly pvp and compare it to your own awsomness then by all means post with a character that HAS a decent killboard showing his 1vs1 or 2vs1 fights and if possible low-sec kills would even top it offf to prove your point.
So as i told the other guy too , go to low-sec ALONE or with 2 to 3 friends at most and try it for a month and see how many kills you'll get that are not on the gates.Your small gang fleets are 30 guys , for a pirate fleet that's massive.Unless you have another char wich HAS pvp'd in low-sec you have absolutely no frikking idea what you're talking about.
And yet again just to re-iterate : i am not a pirate but these types of posts are just too hilarious/sad and full of air. |

Bootleg Jack
Potters Field
216
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:19:00 -
[63] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp.
Unless they [mission runners] pass through a gate right?
So full of **** I'm an American, English is my second language... |

Pipa Porto
623
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:21:00 -
[64] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates,
You mean the Real Pirates who fart around the Gulf of Aiden (the best route for Oil Tankers to take from the Middle East)? Or the Real Pirates who sit around the Strait of Malacca (the best route for crossing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans?
Pirates hang around Choke Points to catch their prey. Always have, always will. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Bootleg Jack
Potters Field
216
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:22:00 -
[65] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
Even EA, as fail as they were, figured this out early on in UO and ended gate camping at moongates.
I'm an American, English is my second language... |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
604
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:22:00 -
[66] - Quote
flakeys wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:It's amazing how the rest of the game thinks in a different way than I do. I have absolutely no sense of attachment or fear of loss or risk. If I lose a ship, I lose several millions sure, then I have to buy a new clone and fit a new ship, but big ******* deal?
Are all of these pirates seriously running around with pods and ships they can't afford to lose? What's wrong with you people. Stop being girly-men. Engage your target and fight to the death. If you lose your officer-fit rifter and 10b pod, that's your dumb-ass mistake not mine. So , as with the last null guy who showed the way to small gang piracy i'll just burst the bubble of this char too. Battleclinic shows 119 kills of wich the largest portion was 50 to 200+ people on the killmail and the smallest i believe was a dramkill with 3 people. Not one single kill on your name , not even for a damn cyno kessie. Regarding how you don't mind loosing crap as you say: 33 losses of wich the most expensive is a blackbird - you know the 5 mille isk ship - and all the rest are rifters and pods. Now if you want to come in here and show the pirates how to properly pvp and compare it to your own awsomness then by all means post with a character that HAS a decent killboard showing his 1vs1 or 2vs1 fights and if possible low-sec kills would even top it offf to prove your point. So as i told the other guy too , go to low-sec ALONE or with 2 to 3 friends at most and try it for a month and see how many kills you'll get that are not on the gates.Your small gang fleets are 30 guys , for a pirate fleet that's massive.Unless you have another char wich HAS pvp'd in low-sec you have absolutely no frikking idea what you're talking about. And yet again just to re-iterate : i am not a pirate but these types of posts are just too hilarious/sad and full of air.
Yeah because low sec entities never hot drop with 10+ BO's/reccons a single ship, hell I saw hot drop on a single command ship with those + supers...so funny indeed, wow, that's great stuff.
brb |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
54
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:23:00 -
[67] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, You mean the Real Pirates who fart around the Gulf of Aiden (the best route for Oil Tankers to take from the Middle East)? Or the Real Pirates who sit around the Strait of Malacca (the best route for crossing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans? Pirates hang around Choke Points to catch their prey. Always have, always will.
No. They don't SIT IN A HARBOR and wait. |

Bootleg Jack
Potters Field
216
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:23:00 -
[68] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, You mean the Real Pirates who fart around the Gulf of Aiden (the best route for Oil Tankers to take from the Middle East)? Or the Real Pirates who sit around the Strait of Malacca (the best route for crossing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans? Pirates hang around Choke Points to catch their prey. Always have, always will.
Educate yourself before you post bullshit, those pirates are not in right in the strait, they are in nearby shipping lanes. The straits themselves are gaurded by several nations warships.
I'm an American, English is my second language... |

Pipa Porto
623
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:28:00 -
[69] - Quote
Bootleg Jack wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, You mean the Real Pirates who fart around the Gulf of Aiden (the best route for Oil Tankers to take from the Middle East)? Or the Real Pirates who sit around the Strait of Malacca (the best route for crossing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans? Pirates hang around Choke Points to catch their prey. Always have, always will. Educate yourself before you post bullshit, those pirates are not in right in the strait, they are in nearby shipping lanes. The straits themselves are gaurded by several nations warships.
"around the" not "around in the"
"around Choke Points" not "around in Choke Points" EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Waylan Yutani
Ghost Headquarters The Ghost Army
29
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:29:00 -
[70] - Quote
A decent pirate corp/alliance cares about its killboard in much the same way as a hi-sec merc corp does. Both groups usually fit their ship to win, not by using t2 modules, but hi-end faction and in some cases officer mods. So when you get ganked, its not because they cheat, it's because they are better and more well prepared than you :-) |

Jim Era
The Syndicate Inc En Garde
87
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:31:00 -
[71] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Bootleg Jack wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, You mean the Real Pirates who fart around the Gulf of Aiden (the best route for Oil Tankers to take from the Middle East)? Or the Real Pirates who sit around the Strait of Malacca (the best route for crossing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans? Pirates hang around Choke Points to catch their prey. Always have, always will. Educate yourself before you post bullshit, those pirates are not in right in the strait, they are in nearby shipping lanes. The straits themselves are gaurded by several nations warships. "around the" not "around in the" "around Choke Points" not "around in Choke Points"
Who are you correcting? |

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations Shaktipat Revelators
362
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:32:00 -
[72] - Quote
Waylan Yutani wrote:A decent pirate corp/alliance cares about its killboard in much the same way as a hi-sec merc corp does. Both groups usually fit their ship to win, not by using t2 modules, but hi-end faction and in some cases officer mods. So when you get ganked, its not because they cheat, it's because they are better and more well prepared than you :-)
This is actually the opposite of what happens, but okay. |

Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:34:00 -
[73] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:[ Yeah because low sec entities never hot drop with 10+ BO's/reccons a single ship, hell I saw hot drop on a single command ship with those + supers...so funny indeed, wow, that's great stuff.
And?
So because you saw it once its automaticly normal for lowsec, dont be ******* stupid. I can make the exact same claim about every major null sec alliance and guess what, it still means nothing!! |

Bootleg Jack
Potters Field
218
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:37:00 -
[74] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Bootleg Jack wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, You mean the Real Pirates who fart around the Gulf of Aiden (the best route for Oil Tankers to take from the Middle East)? Or the Real Pirates who sit around the Strait of Malacca (the best route for crossing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans? Pirates hang around Choke Points to catch their prey. Always have, always will. Educate yourself before you post bullshit, those pirates are not in right in the strait, they are in nearby shipping lanes. The straits themselves are gaurded by several nations warships. "around the" not "around in the" "around Choke Points" not "around in Choke Points"
Around as in far, out of sight far, away.
So in gate terms, not in scan range.
We agree, pirates should not hang at the gates. I'm an American, English is my second language... |

Russell Casey
Gypsy Nation
181
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:37:00 -
[75] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:
You mean the Real Pirates who fart around the Gulf of Aiden (the best route for Oil Tankers to take from the Middle East)? Or the Real Pirates who sit around the Strait of Malacca (the best route for crossing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans?
Pirates hang around Choke Points to catch their prey. Always have, always will.
Said "Choke point" is a hundred miles of water with no Local to tell the tankers when Somali Small Boat Yarr, Inc. is coming. And if said pirates get chased back to their home port by the Navies out patrolling, they get squashed. |

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
343
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 20:49:00 -
[76] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Yeah because low sec entities never hot drop with 10+ BO's/reccons a single ship, hell I saw hot drop on a single command ship with those + supers...so funny indeed, wow, that's great stuff.
Because that makes out for the biggest part of the kills in low-sec right? Come on you can do better then that.
|

Mastin Dragonfly
The Unemployement Agency
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 22:30:00 -
[77] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, You mean the Real Pirates who fart around the Gulf of Aiden (the best route for Oil Tankers to take from the Middle East)? Or the Real Pirates who sit around the Strait of Malacca (the best route for crossing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans? Pirates hang around Choke Points to catch their prey. Always have, always will.
Agreed, piracy has nothing to do with Quake or Team Fortress like PvP, it's not about being fair, it's about trying to make a profit. You go where the prey is and try to move to odds into your favor as much as possible.
And I don't do piracy, or any pvp, I'm just another carebear. There should be a big banner every time you start up EVE saying: THIS GAME IS NOT FAIR, DEAL WITH IT. |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
2517
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 22:41:00 -
[78] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
You have no problem with blobbing the crap out of things so I fail to see how you can complain about '90% of PVP being on gates' (It isn't and you are completely ignorant of the facts). Get a grip and learn to be competent. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 22:46:00 -
[79] - Quote
flakeys wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:It's amazing how the rest of the game thinks in a different way than I do. I have absolutely no sense of attachment or fear of loss or risk. If I lose a ship, I lose several millions sure, then I have to buy a new clone and fit a new ship, but big ******* deal?
Are all of these pirates seriously running around with pods and ships they can't afford to lose? What's wrong with you people. Stop being girly-men. Engage your target and fight to the death. If you lose your officer-fit rifter and 10b pod, that's your dumb-ass mistake not mine. So , as with the last null guy who showed the way to small gang piracy i'll just burst the bubble of this char too. Battleclinic shows 119 kills of wich the largest portion was 50 to 200+ people on the killmail and the smallest i believe was a dramkill with 3 people. Not one single kill on your name , not even for a damn cyno kessie. Regarding how you don't mind loosing crap as you say: 33 losses of wich the most expensive is a blackbird - you know the 5 mille isk ship - and all the rest are rifters and pods. Now if you want to come in here and show the pirates how to properly pvp and compare it to your own awsomness then by all means post with a character that HAS a decent killboard showing his 1vs1 or 2vs1 fights and if possible low-sec kills would even top it offf to prove your point. So as i told the other guy too , go to low-sec ALONE or with 2 to 3 friends at most and try it for a month and see how many kills you'll get that are not on the gates.Your small gang fleets are 30 guys , for a pirate fleet that's massive.Unless you have another char wich HAS pvp'd in low-sec you have absolutely no frikking idea what you're talking about. And yet again just to re-iterate : i am not a pirate but these types of posts are just too hilarious/sad and full of air. God, why am I humoring you?
That killmail report sounds like it hasn't been updated in a while. I can't navigate that ****** battleclinic site though so I can't say for sure, but here's the facts as I know them (I know them pretty well): I don't go on 100+man gang fleets anymore, and I haven't for months. I podjump a lot, so there's that. I've only done frig roams lately and guess what? I don't have a shooting role in them. My job is to turn on my point and web and let other guys do the shooting. I'm not going to have any kills to my name and I'm completely OK with that. I'm happier knowing I'm the ******* who going a point on you than the one who deals the killing blow. Also, most goons don't give a **** about their K:D ratio and can't be arsed to upload a KM half the time. We link the in-game kill, laugh at the "elite pvp" idiots we pop, and move on. Now that we can see the value of a ship and a pod without uploading a killmail anywhere, I can see how my stats might be more anemic than they really are/
I would argue this game isn't really balanced around 1v1 stats or 3-man gang fights, either, but I'm sure my interceptor would lose on its own versus most things.
You're also not seeing all the deaths I don't have. I throw my ships around like they're worthless and I end up NOT DYING most of the time. It's weird how that is, but it might have something to do with not being an idiot. My insurance keeps running out on my interceptors and drakes and it kind of sucks I'm not dying more, honestly. Maybe I would if these mythical elite PvPers with epic battleclinic reports would grow a sac and engage a bunch of mostly T1 frigates, I would die more.
Sad truth is they're mostly a bunch of KM, K:D ratio whoring little children who are afraid to have "death by rifters" show up on their precious killmails. |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
608
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 22:53:00 -
[80] - Quote
Darek Castigatus wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:[ Yeah because low sec entities never hot drop with 10+ BO's/reccons a single ship, hell I saw hot drop on a single command ship with those + supers...so funny indeed, wow, that's great stuff.
And? So because you saw it once its automaticly normal for lowsec, dont be ******* stupid. I can make the exact same claim about every major null sec alliance and guess what, it still means nothing!!
That exactly the point. Whatever arguments you (in general) make about the fact "OMAGAD LO SEC IS DED" is as pointless as the example I gave, but just like you (in general) served my argument. And no I haven't saw this only once, lived enough time in low to see this happen very frequently.
There's absolutely nothing starting by whatever argument that clearly shows low sec will be less populated, the only thing it shows is that some form of combat will be heavily hit, and that form is the roaming gangs. If you read some decent and actually true pirates about this, they will tell you they don't gate camp and still have good fights and good prey witch only means those self proclaimed *pirates* because they're -10 moaning without true argument are just as bad as those carebears they hate so much.
So in the end, the true problem and the only one deserving strong attention is roaming gangs and how this will affect travelling abilities for those real pirates. This yes, I feel concerned about, not about all the moaning and bitching from -10 pubbies feeling bad boys just because they killed in less than 10 sec 20 (or whatever number) shuttles and those alt pods to look badass, those can die and quit I don't give a crap and Eve will just be better without them. brb |

Lord Arakkis
Knights of Illusion SquarePig Transport Empire
28
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 23:11:00 -
[81] - Quote
Starting to understand why I cant seem to find fights when I go into low sec'
Join the Knights Of Illusion STE Corporation! Casual and Hardcore gamers! |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
69
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 23:21:00 -
[82] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. You have no problem with blobbing the crap out of things so I fail to see how you can complain about '90% of PVP being on gates' (It isn't and you are completely ignorant of the facts). Get a grip and learn to be competent.
Non-unique forum post #293847298234982340950239847928934899. |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
69
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 23:24:00 -
[83] - Quote
Mastin Dragonfly wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, You mean the Real Pirates who fart around the Gulf of Aiden (the best route for Oil Tankers to take from the Middle East)? Or the Real Pirates who sit around the Strait of Malacca (the best route for crossing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans? Pirates hang around Choke Points to catch their prey. Always have, always will. Agreed, piracy has nothing to do with Quake or Team Fortress like PvP, it's not about being fair, it's about trying to make a profit. You go where the prey is and try to move to odds into your favor as much as possible. And I don't do piracy, or any pvp, I'm just another carebear. There should be a big banner every time you start up EVE saying: THIS GAME IS NOT FAIR, DEAL WITH IT.
You've missed the point entirely. This isn't about what's fair or not. This is about people bitching that lowsec is dead. People have stated time and time and time and time again that they are afraid of gate campers. I hear it EVERY night. CCP tries to apply a fix to gatecamping to get people to move out of High and into Low, and they ***** more. |

Pipa Porto
624
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 00:06:00 -
[84] - Quote
Bootleg Jack wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Bootleg Jack wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, You mean the Real Pirates who fart around the Gulf of Aiden (the best route for Oil Tankers to take from the Middle East)? Or the Real Pirates who sit around the Strait of Malacca (the best route for crossing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans? Pirates hang around Choke Points to catch their prey. Always have, always will. Educate yourself before you post bullshit, those pirates are not in right in the strait, they are in nearby shipping lanes. The straits themselves are gaurded by several nations warships. "around the" not "around in the" "around Choke Points" not "around in Choke Points" Around as in far, out of sight far, away. So in gate terms, not in scan range. We agree, pirates should not hang at the gates.
No, in gate terms, "on the other side of the gate." The only way to get caught by a camp is if you don't scout. Likewise, the pirates have no way of knowing if a fleet's on the way to stomp them unless they scout.
If you want, there's absolutely nothing stopping you from making and enforcing a code of conduct to get pirate camps off the gates. That's what the several nations of warships are doing. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
156
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 00:09:00 -
[85] - Quote
I understand the problem which the OP has. But it's a general problem of EvE and how it works.
Just two points: 1) you fly in a bubble which is 500*500 km (grid) and even Belts which are just 0,1 AU in distance are to far to travel without warp.
2) no collision detection. You can shot through Asteriods (HARD ROCK), Stations, other Ships and all the stuff which make fights tactical in other games. It's funny, that you can bump ships, rocks, stations ... but your weapons ignore them ALL.
First problem could be solved by makeing grids bigger like 2000km*2000km.
Second problem is easy to solve too.
But both problems can't be solved as CCP wanted to much with fights 1000 v 1000 v 1000 as they happen sometimes. The pur CPU power which woud be needed ... isn't invented till now ;). Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
2517
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 00:13:00 -
[86] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. You have no problem with blobbing the crap out of things so I fail to see how you can complain about '90% of PVP being on gates' (It isn't and you are completely ignorant of the facts). Get a grip and learn to be competent. Non-unique forum post #293847298234982340950239847928934899.
I don't care how 'unique' you think my comment was, I notice you are unable to refute it. Congratulations on proving my point. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
125
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 00:16:00 -
[87] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:I understand the problem which the OP has. But it's a general problem of EvE and how it works.
Just two points: 1) you fly in a bubble which is 500*500 km (grid) and even Belts which are just 0,1 AU in distance are to far to travel without warp.
2) no collision detection. You can shot through Asteriods (HARD ROCK), Stations, other Ships and all the stuff which make fights tactical in other games. It's funny, that you can bump ships, rocks, stations ... but your weapons ignore them ALL.
First problem could be solved by makeing grids bigger like 2000km*2000km.
Second problem is easy to solve too.
But both problems can't be solved as CCP wanted to much with fights 1000 v 1000 v 1000 as they happen sometimes. The pur CPU power which woud be needed ... isn't invented till now ;).
Second problem (collisions/line of sight) is easy to WRITE a solution for, but if you know anything about computer science you know about the efficiency issue. |

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
156
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 00:22:00 -
[88] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Jojo Jackson wrote:I understand the problem which the OP has. But it's a general problem of EvE and how it works.
Just two points: 1) you fly in a bubble which is 500*500 km (grid) and even Belts which are just 0,1 AU in distance are to far to travel without warp.
2) no collision detection. You can shot through Asteriods (HARD ROCK), Stations, other Ships and all the stuff which make fights tactical in other games. It's funny, that you can bump ships, rocks, stations ... but your weapons ignore them ALL.
First problem could be solved by makeing grids bigger like 2000km*2000km.
Second problem is easy to solve too.
But both problems can't be solved as CCP wanted to much with fights 1000 v 1000 v 1000 as they happen sometimes. The pur CPU power which woud be needed ... isn't invented till now ;). Second problem (collisions/line of sight) is easy to WRITE a solution for, but if you know anything about computer science you know about the efficiency issue. As I wrote ... both problems could be solved in no time.
But the hardware it would need might take another 5 to 10 real years. Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
364
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 00:33:00 -
[89] - Quote
XxRTEKxX wrote:Why not add in factors to either encourage pilots to be in belts, at planets etc?
Such as? |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
364
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 00:42:00 -
[90] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote: You've missed the point entirely. This isn't about what's fair or not. This is about people bitching that lowsec is dead. People have stated time and time and time and time again that they are afraid of gate campers. I hear it EVERY night. CCP tries to apply a fix to gatecamping to get people to move out of High and into Low, and they ***** more.
I wish you would have put it that way in your original popst, then we would have had all the petty arguments.
CCP should make it worthwhile for people to live in low sec in the first place. If it's really worth living in low sec more strong corps would live their and they would police the pirate gate camps.
|

Garreth Vlox
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
34
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 00:52:00 -
[91] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
You idiots railing about gate fight do realize we aren't on the gate before or after the fight? you sit off the gate in a safe ( where even the new guns wont do ****) we warp in when the cloaky scout says there is a ship landing we tackle you kill and pod you and then warp out this usually takes less than 1 minute so by making the guns start weak and get strong you're actually HELPING the people you want to get rid of. |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
341
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 01:47:00 -
[92] - Quote
Bootleg Jack wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp. Unless they [mission runners] pass through a gate right? So full of ****
Nothing but net!
|

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
1176
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 02:03:00 -
[93] - Quote
I've been all around EVE (except player null). I can say that only once have I encountered PvP on a gate. And it was my fault because I didn't plan ahead.
Plenty of other places though. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8879
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 03:07:00 -
[94] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:No. They don't SIT IN A HARBOR and wait. Actually, they do for long stretches of time. Much like EVE pirates who dock up to get rid of their flags.
Other than that, pirates in EVE don't sit in harbour either, so your point is not just wrong but also not particularly relevant.
XxRTEKxX wrote:Why not add in factors to either encourage pilots to be in belts, at planets etc? The thing is, to make it work in a way that means people still run across each other on their travels, e.g. by somehow disallowing gate-to-gate travel so you have to bounce off planets or whatever to go where you want to go, then all you're doing is recreating the exact same situation: you are forcing people to go through a number of predetermined choke points, where the pirates will be waiting.
End result: a lot of busywork and a lot of annoyance for players who travel, creating absolutely no change in how people get themselves blown up. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
688
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 03:20:00 -
[95] - Quote
Sarik Olecar wrote:Misanth wrote:Would be interesting to see some CCP stats on how much % of PvP in the various securities that happen, where. At gates, stations, moons/POS, belt, etc. I am willing to bet that the top 2 % spots for PvP in both low and null is gates and moons. And guess what, moons will have a vast, vast impact on the future sec status if Greyskales/CSM get this crazy idea through. Usually at least one party that fight on a POS will eat GCC, and if you are logistic on lowsec POS fights (I have been a number of times), you can easily drop from +5 to -10 sec in just one fight. How do you plan for me to go home now that gates will fire on me just for sitting near them, without even aggressing? Being below -5 just mean you can't travel anywhere without cyno. Great idea. And it also removes the two biggest places you'd be fighting at, gates, and POS, woohoo. Not that it matters, who'd fight in belts, custom offices, plexes etc if you risk dropping sec, then you can't travel home anyway?  Because the new gate guns will one-hit everything as soon as you load grid, right?
I see you don't get the concept. Let me elaborate:
1) You engage at a POS in low sec, for this example you're in a Guardian. You happen to be +5, enemies drop on you and you're repping you friends that have eaten GCC. Fight occur, at the end of this you're somewhere between -10 and -5 sec status. Fight is over, you're chilling 15mins+ in station, have bio etc before moving home (so in normal scenario today, GCC would be gone).
2) Your fleet is moving home. Now, with the new mechanics, being -5 (or flipping a can) means you are automaticly a "suspect", so gates will fire on you even if you don't have a fresh GCC. Unlike today, when they don't.
3) With new mechanic, not only will gates kill a triage carrier in 4,5min, guess how fast they will kill your Guardian/Cruiser hull? 30 seconds? 45? And when your fleet jumps through a gate, hello there, a couple of frigs from FW sees a chance to get a bunch of easy kills. You're a "suspects" and these frigs happily web and point you so you can't make it back to the gate. You will die before your slowlocking battleship friends can save you, and you couldn't have frigs of your own as they would die to sentries even faster. Unless you bring an army of neutral frigs/jammers just to keep your tacklers safe.
The only reality this will bring is: a) Either you purely go around by cyno if you are below -5. b) ..or you simply never drop below -5. You'll have to avoid shooting POS, or POCOs, or flip cans, etc.
People who claim "don't fight on gates", well then Einstein, where are we supposed to fight? We can't drop sec, because that'll make us unable to travel through gates. So no shooting of structures, no first-aggression, no ganking missionrunners (if you even find one), etc. You'll have to hope you find someone else that was brave or stupid enough to go sub -5. If you flip a can you get a 'suspect' mechanic that makes you unable to travel (and probably visit stations) too. So you have to flip your can in belts, and afterward you have to fly around for 15mins+ I guess for your suspect flag to go away.
TL;DR the only ways for future lowsec combat: > FW > Wardec > flip cans, and then expect to sit around in space for 15min+, i.e. super-slowpaced PvP with very little action, most likely noone can be arsed with this so you won't even find many targets either
To be fair, we should insult Greyscale less for this, you'd think people on the CSM would be smart enough to understand this as well. Obviously they ain't, so we should be quite worried overall, and point less fingers at specific individuals. shiptoastin' liek a baws |

Merovee
Gorthaur Legion Of Mordor
28
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 04:18:00 -
[96] - Quote
Gates are like watering holes, lions seem to like watering holes for reasons other than water. |

Mors Sanctitatis
Death of Virtue
757
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 05:37:00 -
[97] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
Not sure if troll or serious lol...
If in fact you're serious, then I reply as follows:
The reason gate camps exist is due to poor game design by CCP. If there were a more efficient and effective way to entrap targets, then the best/brightest players would use said techniques. As it sits, the current game design **PROMOTES** gate camping, with everything else being a poor second choice.
A long while ago, there were various aggro mechanics and war dec loopoholes that allowed enterprising players to take advantage of the less educated and/or intelligent. CCP has seen fit to remove anything and everything that allows more intelligent players to kill the stupid ones through creative means.
In summary: you clearly have little to no real experience when it comes to PVP. If you did, you would realize just how ridiculous you sound.
Now, if CCP removed local... Intelligence shouldn't be free. -á Mining, reloaded. -á-áADDICTED. |

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
161
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 06:05:00 -
[98] - Quote
Pak Narhoo wrote:How about... belts? POCO's, POS's, WH entrance/ exits, anomalies, complexes, missions? You know, the more I think about it the more I feel the OP is right. If you guys actually would get your sticky rear OFF those gates you probably had more targets to pew with. 
lowsec mins and belt npcs are nearly worthless so why would anyone be in a belt? customs office, I'm only going to be there for a few seconds, and it will be with a hauler, no "good fight" for you POS, a pos siege is probably one of the most boring things ever. and tbh I wouldn't call it a small gang activity. although probably one of the better ways to get a "good fight" although getting absolutely nothing besides a big ammo bill is very likely too, some of the RnK video fights happened due to pos fighting, although a bunch happened on gates too. WH, how busy is a random wh exit in lowsec? and hell fighting there is nearly the same as fighting on a gate Anoms, lowsec anoms are pretty worthless I've done some in the past, also they are over rather quickly. complexes, usually run solo or with alt, and are completed pretty quickly, not really "good fight" material Missions, some of the best kills I've gotten have been in missions, but every time has been more of a "gank" than "good fight" amazing how many people will show up when you say golem probed out. |

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
480
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 06:25:00 -
[99] - Quote
Gate guns shooting outlaws and 'suspects' is bullcrap too. Gate guns are lowsec's version of Concord. What is the point of having them open fire on people for looting or canflipping?
I mean, so now when you suicide gank a hauler in highsec, not only does looting the wreck allow anybody to engage you.... but the gate guns open fire on you as well? Seriously? So if some vulture decides to engage you, you can't even really fight back properly because the gate guns roast you before you can even defend yourself.
Crimewatch = poop.
I don't go to lowsec because it is a waste of time. If you want to kill anything of value, you do it in highsec. Flying around for hours and blowing up a 1M ISK Rifter is simply not a productive use of my time - when there are 300M ISK Hulks ripe for the ganking in highsec.
But its pretty clear that this is simply another kick in the nuts to non-consensual PVP.
People engage on gates because A) its one of the only places that people 'go'. B) its the only way to defeat 'local radar'.
OK, pirates are supposed to hang out at planets and in belts now. Great. That will be productive.
The only people that are cheering about this are the carebears who reflexively dislike non-consensual combat "because its mean."
|

Mastin Dragonfly
The Unemployement Agency
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 06:48:00 -
[100] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:Mastin Dragonfly wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, You mean the Real Pirates who fart around the Gulf of Aiden (the best route for Oil Tankers to take from the Middle East)? Or the Real Pirates who sit around the Strait of Malacca (the best route for crossing between the Pacific and Indian Oceans? Pirates hang around Choke Points to catch their prey. Always have, always will. Agreed, piracy has nothing to do with Quake or Team Fortress like PvP, it's not about being fair, it's about trying to make a profit. You go where the prey is and try to move to odds into your favor as much as possible. And I don't do piracy, or any pvp, I'm just another carebear. There should be a big banner every time you start up EVE saying: THIS GAME IS NOT FAIR, DEAL WITH IT. You've missed the point entirely. This isn't about what's fair or not. This is about people bitching that lowsec is dead. People have stated time and time and time and time again that they are afraid of gate campers. I hear it EVERY night. CCP tries to apply a fix to gatecamping to get people to move out of High and into Low, and they ***** more.
Low sec is dead because of crap risk vs reward. You can't make any money at the gates (unless you do distribution missions) so even if the gates are safe you will still have to move it to somewhere that's not safe. And the money to be made in those unsafe places is simply not that much of an improvement over what can be made in high sec to make up for the risk and the hassle. |

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
693
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 07:42:00 -
[101] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:Gate guns shooting outlaws and 'suspects' is bullcrap too. Gate guns are lowsec's version of Concord. What is the point of having them open fire on people for looting or canflipping?
I mean, so now when you suicide gank a hauler in highsec, not only does looting the wreck allow anybody to engage you.... but the gate guns open fire on you as well? Seriously? So if some vulture decides to engage you, you can't even really fight back properly because the gate guns roast you before you can even defend yourself.
Crimewatch = poop.
If CCP and CSM really go through with something like that, that'll be the proof they have last the final connection with what this was/is about. Even tho these new devs have been way too blob- and carebear loving, and iteration is nearly non-existant, some game balancing they have done has actually been quite decent. The core essence in the game has not been killed off, even tho the economy has been a major threat, and smallscale PvP has suffered repeatedly. The core game is still there.
But a change of gategun and security behaviour like the one described, but be truly detrimental for this game. I really hope neither devs or CSM is really that shortsighted. I'm one of those who actually hope this game will live on for another ten years. To begin with. Even tho dev perspectives seems to rather see things in ~1 year profits.  shiptoastin' liek a baws |

Mocam
EVE University Ivy League
163
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 08:03:00 -
[102] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Darek Castigatus wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:[ Yeah because low sec entities never hot drop with 10+ BO's/reccons a single ship, hell I saw hot drop on a single command ship with those + supers...so funny indeed, wow, that's great stuff.
And? So because you saw it once its automaticly normal for lowsec, dont be ******* stupid. I can make the exact same claim about every major null sec alliance and guess what, it still means nothing!! That exactly the point. Whatever arguments you (in general) make about the fact "OMAGAD LO SEC IS DED" is as pointless as the example I gave, but just like you (in general) served my argument. And no I haven't saw this only once, lived enough time in low to see this happen very frequently. There's absolutely nothing starting by whatever argument that clearly shows low sec will be less populated, the only thing it shows is that some form of combat will be heavily hit, and that form is the roaming gangs. If you read some decent and actually true pirates about this, they will tell you they don't gate camp and still have good fights and good prey witch only means those self proclaimed *pirates* because they're -10 moaning without true argument are just as bad as those carebears they hate so much. So in the end, the true problem and the only one deserving strong attention is roaming gangs and how this will affect travelling abilities for those real pirates. This yes, I feel concerned about, not about all the moaning and bitching from -10 pubbies feeling bad boys just because they killed in less than 10 sec 20 (or whatever number) shuttles and those alt pods to look badass, those can die and quit I don't give a crap and Eve will just be better without them.
The bulk of your lowsec dwellers have low sec status; -5 on down. With that, these changes are a non-issue for roaming fights between the bulk of your lowsec residents.
It's legal to shoot any -5 on down and gate-guns won't interfere. This was done by EVE University a while back and seen as an "unfair advantage' -- high sec status folks running a lowsec camp -- they could, with impunity, engage the residents without the sentries coming into play but the reverse? The guns would nail them for attacking "innocents".
The only question on it is a potential problem -- repair of a criminal flags you. So if 2 criminals are around, one damaged from a fight and his corp mate/buddy reps him up near a station or gate -- with the gate guns open fire on the logi pilot?
Odder "funky" mechanics issues like that have cropped up before.
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1002
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 08:38:00 -
[103] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then?
You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?).
Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp.
This is the issue.
The proposed change doesn't "fix" anything, it serves no purpose and just decreases PVP in lowsec.
Shiva Furnace - now recruiting solid pilots! |

Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 08:56:00 -
[104] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Darek Castigatus wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:[ Yeah because low sec entities never hot drop with 10+ BO's/reccons a single ship, hell I saw hot drop on a single command ship with those + supers...so funny indeed, wow, that's great stuff.
And? So because you saw it once its automaticly normal for lowsec, dont be ******* stupid. I can make the exact same claim about every major null sec alliance and guess what, it still means nothing!! That exactly the point. Whatever arguments you (in general) make about the fact "OMAGAD LO SEC IS DED" is as pointless as the example I gave, but just like you (in general) served my argument. And no I haven't saw this only once, lived enough time in low to see this happen very frequently. There's absolutely nothing starting by whatever argument that clearly shows low sec will be less populated, the only thing it shows is that some form of combat will be heavily hit, and that form is the roaming gangs. If you read some decent and actually true pirates about this, they will tell you they don't gate camp and still have good fights and good prey witch only means those self proclaimed *pirates* because they're -10 moaning without true argument are just as bad as those carebears they hate so much. So in the end, the true problem and the only one deserving strong attention is roaming gangs and how this will affect travelling abilities for those real pirates. This yes, I feel concerned about, not about all the moaning and bitching from -10 pubbies feeling bad boys just because they killed in less than 10 sec 20 (or whatever number) shuttles and those alt pods to look badass, those can die and quit I don't give a crap and Eve will just be better without them.
Since I never made any of those arguements im going to ignore that bit of your post.
Funnyly enough an arguement I have been making in other threads about this is basicly what you put in your second paragraph. Stop making assumptions about people who disagree with you, you might find it helps. |

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
344
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 09:34:00 -
[105] - Quote
Proletariat Tingtango wrote:flakeys wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:It's amazing how the rest of the game thinks in a different way than I do. I have absolutely no sense of attachment or fear of loss or risk. If I lose a ship, I lose several millions sure, then I have to buy a new clone and fit a new ship, but big ******* deal?
Are all of these pirates seriously running around with pods and ships they can't afford to lose? What's wrong with you people. Stop being girly-men. Engage your target and fight to the death. If you lose your officer-fit rifter and 10b pod, that's your dumb-ass mistake not mine. So , as with the last null guy who showed the way to small gang piracy i'll just burst the bubble of this char too. Battleclinic shows 119 kills of wich the largest portion was 50 to 200+ people on the killmail and the smallest i believe was a dramkill with 3 people. Not one single kill on your name , not even for a damn cyno kessie. Regarding how you don't mind loosing crap as you say: 33 losses of wich the most expensive is a blackbird - you know the 5 mille isk ship - and all the rest are rifters and pods. Now if you want to come in here and show the pirates how to properly pvp and compare it to your own awsomness then by all means post with a character that HAS a decent killboard showing his 1vs1 or 2vs1 fights and if possible low-sec kills would even top it offf to prove your point. So as i told the other guy too , go to low-sec ALONE or with 2 to 3 friends at most and try it for a month and see how many kills you'll get that are not on the gates.Your small gang fleets are 30 guys , for a pirate fleet that's massive.Unless you have another char wich HAS pvp'd in low-sec you have absolutely no frikking idea what you're talking about. And yet again just to re-iterate : i am not a pirate but these types of posts are just too hilarious/sad and full of air. God, why am I humoring you? That killmail report sounds like it hasn't been updated in a while. I can't navigate that ****** battleclinic site though so I can't say for sure, but here's the facts as I know them (I know them pretty well): I don't go on 100+man gang fleets anymore, and I haven't for months. I podjump a lot, so there's that. I've only done frig roams lately and guess what? I don't have a shooting role in them. My job is to turn on my point and web and let other guys do the shooting. I'm not going to have any kills to my name and I'm completely OK with that. I'm happier knowing I'm the ******* who going a point on you than the one who deals the killing blow. Also, most goons don't give a **** about their K:D ratio and can't be arsed to upload a KM half the time. We link the in-game kill, laugh at the "elite pvp" idiots we pop, and move on. Now that we can see the value of a ship and a pod without uploading a killmail anywhere, I can see how my stats might be more anemic than they really are/ I would argue this game isn't really balanced around 1v1 stats or 3-man gang fights, either, but I'm sure my interceptor would lose on its own versus most things. You're also not seeing all the deaths I don't have. I throw my ships around like they're worthless and I end up NOT DYING most of the time. It's weird how that is, but it might have something to do with not being an idiot. My insurance keeps running out on my interceptors and drakes and it kind of sucks I'm not dying more, honestly. Maybe I would if these mythical elite PvPers with epic battleclinic reports would grow a sac and engage a bunch of mostly T1 frigates, I would die more. Sad truth is they're mostly a bunch of KM, K:D ratio whoring little children who are afraid to have "death by rifters" show up on their precious killmails.
So in short , you don't have experience in low-sec small fight .Ok thanks for proving the point i was making.Now try it for a month and then tell me how ideally it worked out to hunt players in low-sec not using gates.
Nullsec is totally different from low-sec and if you have no experience in it then don't tell them how they should do it and how easy it is. |

Maledictum Aideron
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 10:34:00 -
[106] - Quote
Proletariat Tingtango wrote:It's amazing how the rest of the game thinks in a different way than I do. I have absolutely no sense of attachment or fear of loss or risk. If I lose a ship, I lose several millions sure, then I have to buy a new clone and fit a new ship, but big ******* deal?
Are all of these pirates seriously running around with pods and ships they can't afford to lose? What's wrong with you people. Stop being girly-men. Engage your target and fight to the death. If you lose your officer-fit rifter and 10b pod, that's your dumb-ass mistake not mine.
WUT? LIEK SRSLY?! NO WAI!!11 I CNAT UFORD 2 LOOSE MAH SLEIPNIR!!!11
|

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
370
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 18:33:00 -
[107] - Quote
I don't think that there is a problem with people being risk averse, it's more to do with the fact that you can get enough rewarded without risk. So why would you put yourself in harms way running a low sec complex when you can afk min and run level 4 missions any time you want in HS?
Low sec needs to be as different to high sec as w-space is to null. |

Bunolagus
NIPTO
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 18:43:00 -
[108] - Quote
Tara Read wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Sigh.... You see it's really not that simple and I admire your attitude and agree. The underlying issue really is the "hunt" you speak of. Targets in Low Sec are becoming more and more scarce. With less interest in the systems you hunt in where are said targets? The underlying issue isn't people camping gates (even though a majority of people only do that) it really is the problem of having little to no targets whatsoever. Many corps and alliances in low actually go to null to hunt only to find themselves quickly out manned and outgunned which leaves a bitter taste in peoples mouths. You really want to get those pussies off the gates? Give them a big juicy mouse to catch.
Don't you see that gate camps are the reason you have no targets. Why should I try to venture into lowsec if I have such a high chance of getting caught in a gate camp? You have chased away the prey and then use it as an excuse to chase away more.
|

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
86
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 19:28:00 -
[109] - Quote
blobbing =/= gatecamping |

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
344
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 19:33:00 -
[110] - Quote
Bunolagus wrote:Tara Read wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Sigh.... You see it's really not that simple and I admire your attitude and agree. The underlying issue really is the "hunt" you speak of. Targets in Low Sec are becoming more and more scarce. With less interest in the systems you hunt in where are said targets? The underlying issue isn't people camping gates (even though a majority of people only do that) it really is the problem of having little to no targets whatsoever. Many corps and alliances in low actually go to null to hunt only to find themselves quickly out manned and outgunned which leaves a bitter taste in peoples mouths. You really want to get those pussies off the gates? Give them a big juicy mouse to catch. Don't you see that gate camps are the reason you have no targets. Why should I try to venture into lowsec if I have such a high chance of getting caught in a gate camp? You have chased away the prey and then use it as an excuse to chase away more.
No they haven't.I see this one come up every time.
As said it is VERRY easy to avoid losses at gatecamps to start with in low-sec.So it's not like the gatecamps are the reason no one ventures into low-sec.The reason is there is just no frikking reason to go to low-sec and take any risk even if it is a small one because there is allmost nothing that makes it worth it.
Gateguns do not need alteration , the damned low-sec itself does for years and years and years and once again CCP shows they do not care for those that live in low-sec but for those who wish to travel with ease THROUGH it.
Come on i don't live in low-sec and even i can see that , why are so many of you blind to it ?
|

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
86
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 19:37:00 -
[111] - Quote
flakeys wrote:Bunolagus wrote:Tara Read wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Sigh.... You see it's really not that simple and I admire your attitude and agree. The underlying issue really is the "hunt" you speak of. Targets in Low Sec are becoming more and more scarce. With less interest in the systems you hunt in where are said targets? The underlying issue isn't people camping gates (even though a majority of people only do that) it really is the problem of having little to no targets whatsoever. Many corps and alliances in low actually go to null to hunt only to find themselves quickly out manned and outgunned which leaves a bitter taste in peoples mouths. You really want to get those pussies off the gates? Give them a big juicy mouse to catch. Don't you see that gate camps are the reason you have no targets. Why should I try to venture into lowsec if I have such a high chance of getting caught in a gate camp? You have chased away the prey and then use it as an excuse to chase away more. No they haven't.I see this one come up every time. As said it is VERRY easy to avoid losses at gatecamps to start with in low-sec.So it's not like the gatecamps are the reason no one ventures into low-sec.The reason is there is just no frikking reason to go to low-sec and take any risk even if it is a small one because there is allmost nothing that makes it worth it. Gateguns do not need alteration , the damned low-sec itself does for years and years and years and once again CCP shows they do not care for those that live in low-sec but for those who wish to travel with ease THROUGH it. Come on i don't live in low-sec and even i can see that , why are so many of you blind to it ?
I don't know if that's true, man. I hear all the time on these forums and in game about people not wanting to go to low BECAUSE of gatecamping. Plain and simple. The ppl gatecamping won't admit that they're the reason there's no one in lowsec, but they are. That's all there is to it. |

Aooz
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
30
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 19:37:00 -
[112] - Quote
Rordan D'Kherr wrote: that actually gets a +1
Really?! It actually gets a plus one? As opposed to not getting a plus one? It actually got one? This is exciting. |

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
344
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 19:47:00 -
[113] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:flakeys wrote:Bunolagus wrote:Tara Read wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Sigh.... You see it's really not that simple and I admire your attitude and agree. The underlying issue really is the "hunt" you speak of. Targets in Low Sec are becoming more and more scarce. With less interest in the systems you hunt in where are said targets? The underlying issue isn't people camping gates (even though a majority of people only do that) it really is the problem of having little to no targets whatsoever. Many corps and alliances in low actually go to null to hunt only to find themselves quickly out manned and outgunned which leaves a bitter taste in peoples mouths. You really want to get those pussies off the gates? Give them a big juicy mouse to catch. Don't you see that gate camps are the reason you have no targets. Why should I try to venture into lowsec if I have such a high chance of getting caught in a gate camp? You have chased away the prey and then use it as an excuse to chase away more. No they haven't.I see this one come up every time. As said it is VERRY easy to avoid losses at gatecamps to start with in low-sec.So it's not like the gatecamps are the reason no one ventures into low-sec.The reason is there is just no frikking reason to go to low-sec and take any risk even if it is a small one because there is allmost nothing that makes it worth it. Gateguns do not need alteration , the damned low-sec itself does for years and years and years and once again CCP shows they do not care for those that live in low-sec but for those who wish to travel with ease THROUGH it. Come on i don't live in low-sec and even i can see that , why are so many of you blind to it ? I don't know if that's true, man. I hear all the time on these forums and in game about people not wanting to go to low BECAUSE of gatecamping. Plain and simple. The ppl gatecamping won't admit that they're the reason there's no one in lowsec, but they are. That's all there is to it.
Then those people either never been to low-sec or had a bad encounter wich in 90% of the time is their own stupidity.I have solo pirated a lot of times in the last years every now and then in low-sec and frequently go through it for some trade stuff and besides the choke point entries -just like with nullsec - it is easy to travel through.I have made big losses in those times but they where losses i choose to risk not because it was hard to avoid those engagements.Most people who have experienced low-sec gateganks are those who travelled through rancer-amamake ... that's like jumping into ecp and making that experience your standard view on null gatecamps.
As i said in another response , try and play a solo or small gang pirate yourself in low-sec and do not kill anyone at the gates.Then check after a month how many kills you have made in that time and what that means with your kill number /spent time ratio. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
4417
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 19:54:00 -
[114] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
So "real" pirates ignore the chokepoints with the highest traffic density and trawl round empty space hoping they get lucky and wander into someone's safespot?
Interesting. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 19:56:00 -
[115] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. So "real" pirates ignore the chokepoints with the highest traffic density and trawl round empty space hoping they get lucky and wander into someone's safespot? Interesting.
Seems like real piwats have to hunt the many other juicy ships in lowsec then... erm wait...
|

Garreth Vlox
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
37
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 20:02:00 -
[116] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
I would love to kill someone in a belt you mouthy little ****, but since there is no ******* reason for someone to go to a belt or a planet or anywhere else besides a station or a gate in lowsec because the space is just short of useless, that's the only place you can find a kill unless you find that one guy who actually runs lowsec missions. |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
2528
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 20:44:00 -
[117] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:I hear all the time on these forums and in game about people not wanting to go to low BECAUSE of gatecamping. Plain and simple. The ppl gatecamping won't admit that they're the reason there's no one in lowsec, but they are. That's all there is to it.
People talk a lot and these people are generally ignorant and just making excuses. They hear about how there are gatecamps EVERYWHERE and you die on the first jump-in and rather than actually going out there and experiencing the truth for themselves, they believe and then pass on the bullshit that is fed to them,
Yes some gates are notorious but there are always alternative routes that avoid them. People that don't have a clue just die to the obvious hotspot on the system map and then decide that their one easily avoided death confirms there are indeed gatecamps everywhere while it simply isnt the truth.
You admit to being new to the game but try to speak as an authority figure with much experience. I suggest you climb down off your high horse and get some experience under your belt before coming in here and sounding like a fool. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
86
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 21:21:00 -
[118] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:I hear all the time on these forums and in game about people not wanting to go to low BECAUSE of gatecamping. Plain and simple. The ppl gatecamping won't admit that they're the reason there's no one in lowsec, but they are. That's all there is to it. People talk a lot and these people are generally ignorant and just making excuses. They hear about how there are gatecamps EVERYWHERE and you die on the first jump-in and rather than actually going out there and experiencing the truth for themselves, they believe and then pass on the bullshit that is fed to them, Yes some gates are notorious but there are always alternative routes that avoid them. People that don't have a clue just die to the obvious hotspot on the system map and then decide that their one easily avoided death confirms there are indeed gatecamps everywhere while it simply isnt the truth. You admit to being new to the game but try to speak as an authority figure with much experience. I suggest you climb down off your high horse and get some experience under your belt before coming in here and sounding like a fool.
Can't avoid all of them. Having only a -3.1 can make your life hell. Earlier I had to make some jumps to get a ship contracted to me as I couldn't go into 7's. Gate in the area is camped all day/everyday by the same 5 people. If I avoid that system, it takes me through green areas, where I will get pummeled by CONCORD. If I don't avoid it, I most certainly will get camped to hell.
Not to mention that "pirates" usually gatecamp HEAVY gates with HEAVY traffic. It doesn't matter if there are 98273498234 gates with only 1 being camped. If that ONE being camped is heavily traveled, it's "rewarding" to the pvp pros. You want RISK v. REWARD in lowsec, that's fine. I agree. But there should be risk in AFK gatecamping as well.
So I logged out. |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
2529
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 22:22:00 -
[119] - Quote
Lol. You don't get 'pummeled' by concord just for flying in high sec and you can indeed travel through those systems despite Navy aggro if you know how. Again, a little research and experimentation on your part will make you a more educated player.
It's plainly obvious from your first post here that you are unaware of some pretty simple game mechanics and that is my point entirely. Learn about what you are talking about before you start trying to claim facts. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
137
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 22:46:00 -
[120] - Quote
Kryss Darkdust wrote: like the balls
 |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
87
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 23:01:00 -
[121] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Lol. You don't get 'pummeled' by concord just for flying in high sec and you can indeed travel through those systems despite Navy aggro if you know how. Again, a little research and experimentation on your part will make you a more educated player.
It's plainly obvious from your first post here that you are unaware of some pretty simple game mechanics and that is my point entirely. Learn about what you are talking about before you start trying to claim facts.
Oh. You're one of THOSE players in EVE. Got it. |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
2529
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 23:39:00 -
[122] - Quote
I'm one of those players that safely get a ship through high sec with low security, yes. It's not exactly uncommon. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Pipa Porto
628
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 23:49:00 -
[123] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Lol. You don't get 'pummeled' by concord just for flying in high sec and you can indeed travel through those systems despite Navy aggro if you know how. Again, a little research and experimentation on your part will make you a more educated player.
It's plainly obvious from your first post here that you are unaware of some pretty simple game mechanics and that is my point entirely. Learn about what you are talking about before you start trying to claim facts. Oh. You're one of THOSE players in EVE. Got it.
You mean one the people who bother to learn how the mechanics of the game they play actually work? Yeah, that's probably a pretty accurate assessment of Lady Spank. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
736
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 23:54:00 -
[124] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Lol. You don't get 'pummeled' by concord just for flying in high sec and you can indeed travel through those systems despite Navy aggro if you know how. Again, a little research and experimentation on your part will make you a more educated player.
It's plainly obvious from your first post here that you are unaware of some pretty simple game mechanics and that is my point entirely. Learn about what you are talking about before you start trying to claim facts. Oh. You're one of THOSE players in EVE. Got it.
You must be one of those "MMO" refugees from World of Warcraft if you can make a stupid statement like that. I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

Akirei Scytale
Test Alliance Please Ignore
2235
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 23:56:00 -
[125] - Quote
Look at all the cowards coming out of the woodwork to defend their campy ways. TEST Alliance BEST Alliance |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
736
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 23:59:00 -
[126] - Quote
Akirei Scytale wrote:Look at all the cowards coming out of the woodwork to defend their campy ways.
Says the TEST person, the scourge of blob warfare. :p I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

Samurai Pumpkin
SYPHEN Industries Brainfarts
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 02:01:00 -
[127] - Quote
Ballsy post, I LOVE it.
Best post I've read in a while. |

Jim Roebuck
Union of Protectorates UNITED STAR FEDERATION
14
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 02:05:00 -
[128] - Quote
Delicious PvP complaining tears. I run cheap merc contracts, cheaper than most other merc corps out there, except I fly solo. PM me for more info. |

Kult Altol
Republican Industries Epsilon Fleet
41
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 03:47:00 -
[129] - Quote
Made me lol.
I agree. The whole idea of gate camping doesn't really feel like Eve. Concord Gate camps, players shouldn't. |

Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
407
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 04:24:00 -
[130] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
Nothing wrong with hunting. Nothing wrong with fishing at a gate either. They're very different past-times, but both can be rewarding. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118961
EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody
- Qolde |

Amarra Mandalin
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 04:59:00 -
[131] - Quote
My last (primary) PvP toon was near -10 at one point. I fought both on gates and off and in low-sec and null.
Lazy that I am, I sold him when I decide to become a good girl and go legit (aka wars). Guess where most the fighting occurs? On gates and at stations (games, usually).
It's one thing to have an educated opinion and another just to rant because an mmo isn't designed to make you (the individual) happy.
Suggestion to the OP: Try it all, see what fits. |

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
131
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 05:02:00 -
[132] - Quote
Akirei Scytale wrote:Look at all the cowards coming out of the woodwork to defend their campy ways.
Oh no TEST called us cowards!
How's the Fountain renting coming along? |

Amarra Mandalin
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 05:06:00 -
[133] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Akirei Scytale wrote:Look at all the cowards coming out of the woodwork to defend their campy ways. Oh no TEST called us cowards! How's the Fountain renting coming along?
*waves hand* Is there a discount for ex-BDEAL members that undocked? |

Garresh
Opposite of Low
18
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 05:29:00 -
[134] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:Redacted.
Fully agree. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1239
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 06:57:00 -
[135] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Akirei Scytale wrote:Look at all the cowards coming out of the woodwork to defend their campy ways. Oh no TEST called us cowards! How's the Fountain renting coming along? TEST is renting out Fountain?
I thought Delve was going to be the place filled with renters. Or new alliances. Will they camp the gates? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
344
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 07:02:00 -
[136] - Quote
Akirei Scytale wrote:Look at all the cowards coming out of the woodwork to defend their campy ways.
Tell us more about these cowards , i'm sure we can all learn from your 3 solo kills.Teach us how to not fear the rifter and pod o wise one.We all wanna be just like you.
|

Cede Forster
EVE University Ivy League
12
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 08:30:00 -
[137] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:Akirei Scytale wrote:Look at all the cowards coming out of the woodwork to defend their campy ways. Says the TEST person, the scourge of blob warfare. :p
So blob = gatecamp? That is a bit of a stretch.
and also on the subject, there is no such thing as a blob, it simply means that you got outnumbered which sucks of course for you but it was your choice / inability to bring more ships, not your opponents
FC: Everybody scatter except wing 1, you stay behind and get killed so we can claim they just won because they were a blob <-- this? |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 11:17:00 -
[138] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Lol. You don't get 'pummeled' by concord just for flying in high sec and you can indeed travel through those systems despite Navy aggro if you know how. Again, a little research and experimentation on your part will make you a more educated player.
It's plainly obvious from your first post here that you are unaware of some pretty simple game mechanics and that is my point entirely. Learn about what you are talking about before you start trying to claim facts. Oh. You're one of THOSE players in EVE. Got it. You mean one the people who bother to learn how the mechanics of the game they play actually work? Yeah, that's probably a pretty accurate assessment of Lady Spank.
I understand the mechanics. If I'm not playing the game, I'm reading about it almost 8 hours a day at work. But, this has nothing to do with security status or hisec space, does it? Lady Spank threw out a red herring. People usually do that when they either don't have anything real to say, or are just trying to nudge the conversation into a position where they have a better stance.
My bad for wanting EVE PVP to be more than just sitting at gates. Silly me. What was I thinking! |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
298
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 11:31:00 -
[139] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:I'm one of those players that safely get a ship through high sec with low security, yes. It's not exactly uncommon.
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:Can't avoid all of them. Having only a -3.1 can make your life hell. Earlier I had to make some jumps to get a ship contracted to me as I couldn't go into 7's. In about 1-2 hours I will probably be in a similar situation as Boudicca as my main needs a new armorcane and can't enter high-sec without getting shot.
So far my plan is to haul it into low-sec with my (positive sec status) Orca alt but that's obviously pretty risky and if there is a camp I might have to wait for a few hours.
So if you have a suggestions how I can pick up the Hurricane with my main and make it safely back to low-sec I would be very interested. |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
97
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 11:38:00 -
[140] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:Lady Spank wrote:I'm one of those players that safely get a ship through high sec with low security, yes. It's not exactly uncommon. Boudicca Arbosa wrote:Can't avoid all of them. Having only a -3.1 can make your life hell. Earlier I had to make some jumps to get a ship contracted to me as I couldn't go into 7's. In about 1-2 hours I will probably be in a similar situation as Boudicca as my main needs a new armorcane and can't enter high-sec without getting shot. So far my plan is to haul it into low-sec with my (positive sec status) Orca alt but that's obviously pretty risky and if there is a camp I might have to wait for a few hours. So if you have a suggestions how I can pick up the Hurricane with my main and make it safely back to low-sec I would be very interested.
I ended up having a corp member buy and contract me out a fully fit PVE 'cane. If you want, though, I'm going to 0.0 this morning to rat for sec status. I think I grinded for 4 hours yesterday and only moved up a point. From -3.1 to 3.0....which afforded me nothing because I don't think the next level hits until -2.4. Hah.
Hate the idea of being disciplined for PVP but I understand how it's necessary. I lost my sec status defending my home. And here I'm the one getting punished! Hah. Anyway, add me and we'll go to 0.0 together this morning if you want. |

McRoll
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
47
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 12:10:00 -
[141] - Quote
The problem is not so much the players, it's the game design. Sadly, fighting on gates is the most effective and fastest way to get kills, so you find all players there obviously. I had this mindset to get "good pvp" earlier as well, but after half a year of pirating in lowsec I just realized that it is a huge waste of time, so I just used my smartbomb BS and instalocking Mach on sniperspots until I got bored of it.
Eve just looks like it was a space game but lacks everything that lets you feel like you would actually travel through space. It is just moving from one fixed point to another, those fixed points are belts, stations, gates and another objects that you warp to. In between there is nothing and this is the problem.
If you would actually need to travel between those fixed points at varios speeds and if you had the ability to search and intercept ships mid- travel, then we would have more exciting and credible space combat. Also, the ability to warp away after couple of seconds of picking up speed kills various forms of PvP. It would be better if it would take more time to accelerate and the warp disrupting ability would be greatly reduced, this way ships would need to maneuver around way more and one would get more possibilities to intercept ships on other locations than just gates.
But then again this would mean a total redesign of the game so it's not gonna happen. I personally hope that some day there will be another space game that gets the space combat thing better than Eve. |

Kunming
CyberShield Inc ROMANIAN-LEGION
69
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 12:17:00 -
[142] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:All this moaning about 'gate camping' is hillarious.
You know people have to use them, so thats a great place to catch targets
You know people have to use them, so thats a great place to stop ppl moving around
Free targets for minimal risk is not good game play.
|

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
99
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 12:28:00 -
[143] - Quote
Kunming wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:All this moaning about 'gate camping' is hillarious.
You know people have to use them, so thats a great place to catch targets You know people have to use them, so thats a great place to stop ppl moving around Free targets for minimal risk is not good game play.
But people whine about hisec being the same thing. Free ISK for minimal risk. It all comes full circle. |

Akirei Scytale
Test Alliance Please Ignore
2237
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 12:44:00 -
[144] - Quote
flakeys wrote:Akirei Scytale wrote:Look at all the cowards coming out of the woodwork to defend their campy ways. Tell us more about these cowards , i'm sure we can all learn from your 3 solo kills.Teach us how to not fear the rifter and pod o wise one.We all wanna be just like you.
I've killed a lot more than 3 people solo. TEST Alliance BEST Alliance |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
9050
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 13:41:00 -
[145] - Quote
Kunming wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:All this moaning about 'gate camping' is hillarious.
You know people have to use them, so thats a great place to catch targets You know people have to use them, so thats a great place to stop ppl moving around Free targets for minimal risk is not good game play. Minimal risk, you must be joking or trolling? Camping gates is far from that and anyone who has done it, will tell you the same.
Someone else said this in another thread, "It's like having a large sign saying 'come at me bro'."
Let's look at nerfing your income and see how far we get.
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 14:31:00 -
[146] - Quote
this is part of the reason why real pvpers stay away from EVE. Also the fact the pvp is devoid of player skill. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
9050
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 14:34:00 -
[147] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:this is part of the reason why real pvpers stay away from EVE. Also the fact the pvp is devoid of player skill. Wha...?
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Tom Gerard
Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
376
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 14:40:00 -
[148] - Quote
There is LOTS of skill =P
Everyone has to press F1 when I tell them to.
Fleet: 2x Broadsword 7x Tornado 1x Huggin
Typical fleet: 15m prep 15m travel 15m camp 15m RTB
Been hot-dropped once and picked up a Panther kill after losing 4 nados and a huggin.
On gate we push nearly 100% kills, lots of T3s =)
If you need a friend call me @ (501) 444-CCNA |

Russell Casey
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
181
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 14:52:00 -
[149] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:this is part of the reason why real pvpers stay away from EVE. Also the fact the pvp is devoid of player skill.
They stay away because they have to do PvE to PvP. PvP'ers in most games want to press a button, get some thrills, then log off and go do something else. Likewise, PvE'ers want to just farm something without having to run from PvP'ers all the time (the real reason the highsec crowd won'tl go to low even with these changes). And both stay away because they hate losing their crap when they die and having to start over. |

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
132
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 14:55:00 -
[150] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:this is part of the reason why real pvpers stay away from EVE. Also the fact the pvp is devoid of player skill.
My idiot alarm is going haywire.
Learn to pvp. |

Kingston Black
Hostile. PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
35
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 15:47:00 -
[151] - Quote
utterly hate the proposed changes, what i liked about lowsec was the fact that the gate guns mean there were no small ships forcing people into heavier tanked ships thus changing the feel of combat. I love roaming in null sec and flying around in sabres and fast tackle and its great fun but i really find the change of pace of lowsec with all bs gangs and t3 tackle refreshing and the same with wh combat tbh. Changing lowsec so everyone is using frigate tackle at the gate is just making the game samey and rather lame tbh not to mention making it harder for newbies in small ships to run away
And for those people saying "you should go and find kills and not camp gates" we do, no one will fight us directly so we have to bait people with neutral alts then bridge em cause theyre all pussies ;)
On a side note, just delay or remove local and perhaps people would pvp in system more.... just a suggestion.... |

Tom Gerard
Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
380
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 15:56:00 -
[152] - Quote
Kingston Black wrote:remove local
Only valid point in the entire paragraph, but it is a good point =P
If you need a friend call me @ (501) 444-CCNA |

Kingston Black
Hostile. PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
35
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 16:00:00 -
[153] - Quote
guess you like the pvp to be the same all over eve then if you disagree with the rest then :P
but ehh im not here to argue CCP will **** over whatever they want to as usual and we'll all have to adapt or have a winter of rage with the only 3 guys that live in lowsec
|

Tom Gerard
Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
380
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 16:03:00 -
[154] - Quote
Kingston Black wrote:guess you like the pvp to be the same all over eve then if you disagree with the rest then :P
but ehh im not here to argue CCP will **** over whatever they want to as usual and we'll all have to adapt or have a winter of rage with the only 3 guys that live in lowsec
I agree that if the changes go in with local enabled, bad things will happen. If you need a friend call me @ (501) 444-CCNA |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
904
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 16:28:00 -
[155] - Quote
Sadly Eve Online mechanics make it so that 99% of pvp happens at gates and stations. Its simply the way it is. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
2533
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 16:34:00 -
[156] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:this is part of the reason why real pvpers stay away from EVE. Also the fact the pvp is devoid of player skill. Wha...? He is helping you to reach for the block button. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1239
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 16:36:00 -
[157] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Mag's wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:this is part of the reason why real pvpers stay away from EVE. Also the fact the pvp is devoid of player skill. Wha...? He is helping you to reach for the block button. Gotta press F1.
Maybe even F2 for the scram and F3 for the web. Newbies can do this as well... along with targeting, of course. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Tub Chil
Heretic University Heretic Nation
22
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 16:59:00 -
[158] - Quote
you will be amazed op, but essential element of PVP are human players and for some reason, they happen to pass gates from time to time. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1240
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 03:02:00 -
[159] - Quote
Tub Chil wrote:you will be amazed op, but essential element of PVP are human players and for some reason, they happen to pass gates from time to time. Not everyone can skip past gates without jumping through.  Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Pipa Porto
633
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 03:09:00 -
[160] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Tub Chil wrote:you will be amazed op, but essential element of PVP are human players and for some reason, they happen to pass gates from time to time. Not everyone can skip past gates without jumping through. 
I do it by hopping. Combined with a skip and a jump, it's an unstoppable combo for travel. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Boudicca Arbosa
Aegis Requiem. Byzantine Empire
103
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 13:14:00 -
[161] - Quote
McRoll wrote:The problem is not so much the players, it's the game design. Sadly, fighting on gates is the most effective and fastest way to get kills, so you find all players there obviously. I had this mindset to get "good pvp" earlier as well, but after half a year of pirating in lowsec I just realized that it is a huge waste of time, so I just used my smartbomb BS and instalocking Mach on sniperspots until I got bored of it.
Eve just looks like it was a space game but lacks everything that lets you feel like you would actually travel through space. It is just moving from one fixed point to another, those fixed points are belts, stations, gates and another objects that you warp to. In between there is nothing and this is the problem.
If you would actually need to travel between those fixed points at varios speeds and if you had the ability to search and intercept ships mid- travel, then we would have more exciting and credible space combat. Also, the ability to warp away after couple of seconds of picking up speed kills various forms of PvP. It would be better if it would take more time to accelerate and the warp disrupting ability would be greatly reduced, this way ships would need to maneuver around way more and one would get more possibilities to intercept ships on other locations than just gates.
But then again this would mean a total redesign of the game so it's not gonna happen. I personally hope that some day there will be another space game that gets the space combat thing better than Eve.
Good post. Agree with most everything here. |

Alexzandvar Douglass
NUTS AND BOLTS MANUFACTURING En Garde
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 13:19:00 -
[162] - Quote
There was a small gang in one of our nearby systems whining because they exited a Wormhole to grief some ratters and they happened into 2 gate camps of ours previously trying to catch a few goonies.
Funniest part was the wormhole closed behind them. |

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp Black Thorne Alliance
326
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 15:45:00 -
[163] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:IGNATIUS HOOD wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp. Form fleet, burn up a POS? Form fleet, burn up a POCO? Thats what I'd be doing if I wanted to get into a fight. Eventually someone will respond. And before you whine about grinding structures. HTFU. Want a curb stomp battle, gotta find a curb. Because you just click your fingers and you've destroyed a POS... Oh wait, i have to come back in 1 day 16 hours only to be hot dropped by 5 random corps?  I do shoot structures now and again but it's boring as **** most of the time and i'd pick unpredictable gate fights anytime.
If this is your only gripe then I say you lack tactical flexibility.
The act of reinforcing a tower pretty much guarantees a fight if the corp who owns it is willing to defend it. Is there a chance they bring more than you bargained on? Yes, it is warfare afterall and he'll want to win as badly as you do. No plan survives contact with the enemy.
In that case then maybe you need to pick your targets more carefully. To win fights you need to know what you're capabilities are as well as those of your opponent. And if you bring your entire assembled force to kill the tower, leaving nothing in reserve to deal with drops or to give you a chance to manage an extract if it goes to hell on you then I just don't know what to tell you.
All I'm saying is that if you want a fight (win or lose) going after something someone would like to keep is the quickest way to get one. The surest way to get an enemy to commit to battle to is to attack something he values. In EVE that happens to be structures and ships. Ships can run away, Structures cannot.
Also, look closely at the last sentence in my first post. I would classify your post as whining about grinding structures, ergo HTFU. 
'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you.
~I fly spaceships~ |

Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
90
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 15:59:00 -
[164] - Quote
Why exactly do you think eve has gates? Its designed to create content. Without the bottlenecks at gates there would never be any fights (thanks to hideously broken local and d-scan) that weren't over pos. And when it comes to pos most people in eve couldn't care less about them. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1241
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 16:02:00 -
[165] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Oh wait, i have to come back in 1 day 16 hours only to be hot dropped by 5 random corps?  5 random corps instead of three fleets and supercaps from 1 alliance?
Whose structure are you shooting? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alexzandvar Douglass
NUTS AND BOLTS MANUFACTURING En Garde
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 16:03:00 -
[166] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Oh wait, i have to come back in 1 day 16 hours only to be hot dropped by 5 random corps?  5 random corps instead of three fleets and supercaps from 1 alliance? Whose structure are you shooting?
That may be how it is in Null sec with the Sov wars. But in low sec stuff turns into a cluster **** real fast. |

Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
90
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 16:08:00 -
[167] - Quote
IGNATIUS HOOD wrote:Rek Seven wrote:IGNATIUS HOOD wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world. Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then? You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?). Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp. Form fleet, burn up a POS? Form fleet, burn up a POCO? Thats what I'd be doing if I wanted to get into a fight. Eventually someone will respond. And before you whine about grinding structures. HTFU. Want a curb stomp battle, gotta find a curb. Because you just click your fingers and you've destroyed a POS... Oh wait, i have to come back in 1 day 16 hours only to be hot dropped by 5 random corps?  I do shoot structures now and again but it's boring as **** most of the time and i'd pick unpredictable gate fights anytime. If this is your only gripe then I say you lack tactical flexibility. The act of reinforcing a tower pretty much guarantees a fight if the corp who owns it is willing to defend it. Is there a chance they bring more than you bargained on? Yes, it is warfare afterall and he'll want to win as badly as you do. No plan survives contact with the enemy. In that case then maybe you need to pick your targets more carefully. To win fights you need to know what you're capabilities are as well as those of your opponent. And if you bring your entire assembled force to kill the tower, leaving nothing in reserve to deal with drops or to give you a chance to manage an extract if it goes to hell on you then I just don't know what to tell you. All I'm saying is that if you want a fight (win or lose) going after something someone would like to keep is the quickest way to get one. The surest way to get an enemy to commit to battle to is to attack something he values. In EVE that happens to be structures and ships. Ships can run away, Structures cannot. Also, look closely at the last sentence in my first post. I would classify your post as whining about grinding structures, ergo HTFU. 
So a couple of casual players wanting a fight should try to solo reinforce a pos (hours of grinding and not even), then come back possibly outwith thier timezone giving the defender every advantage assuming they bother to turn up. So our heros are now either dead, wasted their time reinforcing a pos they couldn't be on to kill, or if they are really committed have spent 3 days to kill a pos and now have 50 fuel blocks reward, score.
Sounds like great game design.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1241
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 16:15:00 -
[168] - Quote
Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Oh wait, i have to come back in 1 day 16 hours only to be hot dropped by 5 random corps?  5 random corps instead of three fleets and supercaps from 1 alliance? Whose structure are you shooting? That may be how it is in Null sec with the Sov wars. But in low sec stuff turns into a cluster **** real fast. Of course, it's a lot harder to tackle those supercaps, they can drop in and jump out pretty fast if they're good at it.
Too bad you don't have bubbles there. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Alexzandvar Douglass
NUTS AND BOLTS MANUFACTURING En Garde
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 16:18:00 -
[169] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Oh wait, i have to come back in 1 day 16 hours only to be hot dropped by 5 random corps?  5 random corps instead of three fleets and supercaps from 1 alliance? Whose structure are you shooting? That may be how it is in Null sec with the Sov wars. But in low sec stuff turns into a cluster **** real fast. Of course, it's a lot harder to tackle those supercaps, they can drop in and jump out pretty fast if they're good at it. Too bad you don't have bubbles there.
Mostly my experience with it is that you end up stacking up people who thought it would be a good idea to jump in the fight because several gangs were fighting each other, with the process repeating till everyone if very hurt and very sad. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
971
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 17:59:00 -
[170] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, ... DERP
Yeah!
Everybody knows that REAL pirates went deep out to sea to find their victims. They didn't lurk in commonly used trade lanes or near lucrative seaports.
No Sir, they stayed away from where all the traffic and valuable cargo was.
Here's your sign... |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1241
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 18:04:00 -
[171] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, ... DERP Yeah! Everybody knows that REAL pirates went deep out to sea to find their victims. They didn't lurk in commonly used trade lanes or near lucrative seaports. No Sir, they stayed away from where all the traffic and valuable cargo was. Did they also attack in places where magical police would teleport in and blow them up? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Homo Jesus
The LGBT Last Supper
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 18:09:00 -
[172] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:War Kitten wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, ... DERP Yeah! Everybody knows that REAL pirates went deep out to sea to find their victims. They didn't lurk in commonly used trade lanes or near lucrative seaports. No Sir, they stayed away from where all the traffic and valuable cargo was. Did they also attack in places where magical police would teleport in and blow them up?
Holy crap, I think we just discovered the fool proof way to stop the Somali pirate problem. Add sentries that "ramp up" and magical police to the ocean.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1241
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 18:32:00 -
[173] - Quote
Homo Jesus wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Did they also attack in places where magical police would teleport in and blow them up? Holy crap, I think we just discovered the fool proof way to stop the Somali pirate problem. Add sentries that "ramp up" and magical police to the ocean. Don't the somali use small ships though? The current sentries that instapop frigates would be better than ones that ramp up, allowing those small ships to survive for a while. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Homo Jesus
The LGBT Last Supper
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 18:39:00 -
[174] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Homo Jesus wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Did they also attack in places where magical police would teleport in and blow them up? Holy crap, I think we just discovered the fool proof way to stop the Somali pirate problem. Add sentries that "ramp up" and magical police to the ocean. Don't the somali use small ships though? The current sentries that instapop frigates would be better than ones that ramp up, allowing those small ships to survive for a while.
Oh dummy me, you are so right. See sentries work fine and should be added in their current form to the ocean. |

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp Black Thorne Alliance
326
|
Posted - 2012.08.08 18:47:00 -
[175] - Quote
[/quote]
So a couple of casual players wanting a fight should try to solo reinforce a pos (hours of grinding and not even), then come back possibly outwith thier timezone giving the defender every advantage assuming they bother to turn up. So our heros are now either dead, wasted their time reinforcing a pos they couldn't be on to kill, or if they are really committed have spent 3 days to kill a pos and now have 50 fuel blocks reward, score.
Sounds like great game design. [/quote]
*sigh*
I don't know what to tell you. All I'm saying is that in my opinion the best place to do so is at a Structure becuase you have a pretty good chance of getting a response.
If you want pointless PVP for lulz join a corp that does that kind of thing. Or go to Amamake and warp to the top belt and see what happens.
All that being said, I don't think any answer I could give you would satisfy you. Either you're a troll or just a person who enjoys being miserable. 'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you.
~I fly spaceships~ |

alittlebirdy
All Hail The Liopleurodon
48
|
Posted - 2012.08.08 19:10:00 -
[176] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.
I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.
So your a noob but think you know how stuff works? LOL
Your a new player in a cane already... who still **** fits
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14218318
But you know how to find targets not at a gate... rofl
FLEET fights happen at gates ******...
Nother **** fit example http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14241113
And looking at your kills
http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=1427186&m=7&y=2012&view=kills
O ya... you should talk about gate camps... maybe kill something with less that 5 to one odds lawl...
Spend hours hunting and killing only noobs (no vet is gona get caught not jumping a gate) ORRRRRRRRRRR sit at a gate and kill everything...
Yep new players they know it all..
Nice cane and ruppy fits. |

Parsee789
Immaterial and Missing Power
140
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 03:25:00 -
[177] - Quote
Keep the Sentry gun damage as they are, but add some new things.
Heavy ECM and Energy Neutralizing Batteries.
Each turret will be supplemented with 4 ECM and 2 Neut Batteries. So 2 turrets will have 8:4, 3 will have 12:6, so on and so forth.
This will keep PVP on gates, but will make it harder and more frustrating against gate campers. |

baltec1
Bat Country
1856
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 03:32:00 -
[178] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:War Kitten wrote:Boudicca Arbosa wrote:If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, ... DERP Yeah! Everybody knows that REAL pirates went deep out to sea to find their victims. They didn't lurk in commonly used trade lanes or near lucrative seaports. No Sir, they stayed away from where all the traffic and valuable cargo was. Did they also attack in places where magical police would teleport in and blow them up?
They called them the Royal Navy |

lag kills
The Generic Pirate Corporation Fusion.
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 03:35:00 -
[179] - Quote
Boudicca Arbosa wrote: I'm a goddamn new player
well, that was obvious. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |