| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] [18]:: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
687
   |
Posted - 2012.09.01 11:16:00 -
[511] - Quote
Kryss Darkdust wrote:Quote:
Low sec vomits trillions of isk only a few are doing because players living there have done of that place what it is, a waste land, and then complain moan and cry lvl4 should come to low sec...give us a break.
Go out to low sec and prove you can make Trillions of ISK ... seriously, no offense but you have no idea what your talking about. It takes serious organization, team work and considerable effort to do well in Low Sec and no matter what your always under threat of losing it on a daily basis. You get that organized in a team in high sec and you stand to make a hell of a lot more ISK and its practically assured since the risk of losing it is so minimal even with suicide ganking. Experience is the great teacher here, unless you have tried it you should be careful about sharing your opinion on it. I have done low sec to death, I have done high sec to death and its no contest, I can make 1000% more ISK in high sec.
Do you eve realise you have no bubbles in low sec?
Do you even realise gates and stations have gun, weak of course but it's a little support.
Can you even think I can go there and do whatever I'm pleased to the moment I know what I'm doing and you will probably never be able to catch me because low sec, when you know how to, the chances you get caught by something are very thin.
High sec players issue is that you guys don't even give them a chance to learn they're already pop and podded before they realise whatever.
Now tell us all how you do to not make tons of isk when:
-All you need is a speed tanked frig and an alt to literally make billions of isk with FW playing a couple hours a day
-A little bit of scanning and if you can't make at least 2 billions a day you're doing it wrong, it takes 2/3 hours max
Then explain me how much time as a single player it takes you to make 1 billion running lvl4's, same billion mining, same billion doing other stuff.
The fact you're better being in some organised local corp/alliance is one thing, the fact trillions of isk are there to be made but little to no one doing it is another thing.
The problem is not the amounts of rewards there to be made, it's a myth telling low sec rewards are bad and I'm sure CCP can prove you're wrong just by providing some numbers.
Edit: just to add before I live in null I was a low sec resident, had my hard lessons taken and also rewards, all I've learned over there was with old -10 dudes but didn't made me invulnerable or omniscient in low just learned me some basics and how to have fun over there killing stuff but also how to make easy isk because there's almost no one to bother you.
Now if you still think you can do 10000% more isk in high sec than low I will still tell you that you're doing it wrong and that's a fact. You choose to do stuff in high sec because you don't want to take any risk in low doing it, that simple.
The only way for you to do better isk in high is by banking haulers/freighters/pimp mission boats and only because Concord makes it safe enough for you to do it.
brb |
Seleia O'Sinnor
Drop of Honey
255
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 11:33:00 -
[512] - Quote
Wow he even has his own domain on the internets! He must be speakin true.
CCP trying to increase the player base? Holy **** and I thought they made their move to keep out all the millions of would be risk loving hardcore Nullsec residents of their game.
New inventory: Getting better since version 1.2, but what about back and forward buttons? |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
667
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 12:01:00 -
[513] - Quote
Seleia O'Sinnor wrote:CCP trying to increase the player base? Holy **** and I thought they made their move to keep out all the millions of would be risk loving hardcore Nullsec residents of their game.
You are probably right, after all the nerfs, buffs and changes done over the years CCP probably just decided that given the state Null is in now it's not worth having new players in Null. That and the current players have left the place in such a state.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Evelyn Meiyi
Meiyi Family Holdings
36
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 03:55:00 -
[514] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Evelyn Meiyi wrote:Do you really want a game that rewards sitting in safety?
Personally, part of my initial attraction to EVE was the 'anything can happen' atmosphere. I could get suicide-ganked in high-sec, but IRL I might also step off the curb and get flattened by a speeding bus.
It' that uncertainty that adds depth to EVE -- we're never ever totally safe. Not in EVE and not in our own homes. It's in learning to choose how much we'll risk that keeps things interesting. Do you live in a POS, because otherwise you're fine if your home is a captain's quarters. If it's the case that "niche" EVE is not as good a prospect as "WoW" EVE, then maybe it's the case that simply no market can be made for it. But first, we gotta make sure that suicide ganking with Catalysts isn't profitable, since that was clearly never intended, eh
What I meant by 'in our homes' was our real homes; we're never, ever one-hundred-percent invulnerable, even in a supposedly 'secure' environment.
I agree that suicide ganking needs to be reduced in profitability, but to turn one-quarter of the game's total space into an unassailable fortress or 'safe haven' would be against the very spirit of the 'sandbox' that EVE is designed to support. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1290
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 04:59:00 -
[515] - Quote
Evelyn Meiyi wrote:What I meant by 'in our homes' was our real homes; we're never, ever one-hundred-percent invulnerable, even in a supposedly 'secure' environment.
I agree that suicide ganking needs to be reduced in profitability, but to turn one-quarter of the game's total space into an unassailable fortress or 'safe haven' would be against the very spirit of the 'sandbox' that EVE is designed to support.
So we're settling on the T1 catalyst standard for ganking profitability? Or maybe the T2 catalyst standard?
So it's like ... 30 T2Cs worth for a mack and 70T2cs for an Orca, I guess? Or 90T1Cs for the mack....
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd
Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] [18]:: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |