Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 35 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 16 post(s) |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
2251
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 00:35:00 -
[301] - Quote
Ashera Yune wrote:The fact that its better to shield tank the thorax than it is to armor proves that the gallente armor blaster philosophy is broken.
The shield talos is one of the best blaster ships in the game. Fast, mobile, and does lots of damage.
While the failtastic active armor tanking Hyperion is rare used compared to the megathron and its variants.
The Hype has 5 mid slots and is surprisingly fast and agile for a battleship. You should check that bad boy out shield tanked! It totally dominates the Tempest at the BS-playing-as-a-BC role. The Mach cheats. 
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Garr Earthbender
Justified Chaos
55
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 01:26:00 -
[302] - Quote
Hmm.. You think the 800mm plate would allow the T1 logi enough time to lock it and rep it a little bit? Don't get me wrong, I really wanna fit a 1600 on my omen. However, if an 800 and T1 logi works together then I'm good with that. -Rock is overpowered, Scissors is fine. |

OT Smithers
Buccaneer's Den
150
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 01:52:00 -
[303] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:OT Smithers wrote:On first glance the Caracal changes looked a bit flacid. Where other already exceptional cruisers become still more epic, the Caldari joke boat would only become useable.
After reading the proposed missile changes I see now that this initial impression was in error. The Caracal will end up worse off than it is today -- a cruiser pushing the DPS of a T1 frigate. The Caracal's DPS is gone into earlier in the thread. It's able to fit a 3 BCU setup with HML, MWD, and LSE and come away with a very reasonable tank and copious amounts of ewar. Furthermore, its DPS difference is pretty minor. You're making a big deal about nothing. IMO the Caracal and the Thorax are THE standouts of this boost, the Stabber is coming out alright, and the Omen is a steaming pile of **** in practical PVP. -Liang
Get serious :)
Almost no one is using the Caracal today, and for bloody good reason. Now they are talking a 20% damage nerf plus the addition of added damage reduction in the form of TD's.
You have a mediocre tank, DPS half that of an AF, no neut, two small drones, and it's not even particularly fast.... What exactly are you gonna kill with it?
Again, people aren't using it NOW. Why in God's name would they use it when every other cruiser and frigate in the game just got significantly better while this ship got nerfed?
|

Hrett
Justified Chaos
197
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 03:09:00 -
[304] - Quote
OT Smithers wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:OT Smithers wrote:On first glance the Caracal changes looked a bit flacid. Where other already exceptional cruisers become still more epic, the Caldari joke boat would only become useable.
After reading the proposed missile changes I see now that this initial impression was in error. The Caracal will end up worse off than it is today -- a cruiser pushing the DPS of a T1 frigate. The Caracal's DPS is gone into earlier in the thread. It's able to fit a 3 BCU setup with HML, MWD, and LSE and come away with a very reasonable tank and copious amounts of ewar. Furthermore, its DPS difference is pretty minor. You're making a big deal about nothing. IMO the Caracal and the Thorax are THE standouts of this boost, the Stabber is coming out alright, and the Omen is a steaming pile of **** in practical PVP. -Liang Get serious :) Almost no one is using the Caracal today, and for bloody good reason. Now they are talking a 20% damage nerf plus the addition of added damage reduction in the form of TD's. You have a mediocre tank, DPS half that of an AF, no neut, two small drones, and it's not even particularly fast.... What exactly are you gonna kill with it? Again, people aren't using it NOW. Why in God's name would they use it when every other cruiser and frigate in the game just got significantly better while this ship got nerfed?
T1 cruisers, including the Caracal, are used in FacWar all of the time. This is a nice buff to it. I'm probably typing on an iPad, which means the auto-correct is silly and fixing typos is a pain. I ain't fixing them. |

Aurelius Valentius
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
178
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 04:18:00 -
[305] - Quote
I vote we change the stabber to a class of "War Frigate" or "Battle Frigate" - a stepping hull to the Vaga the real Cruiser hull... it seems to fit that role more than the current cruiser hull role.
On a serious note - 4/4 fit HS would be nice, 15/15 drone bay... that would be a nice thought. Look at all the Macks in local...impressive... very impressive... I see you have fashioned a new exhumer... much like you father's... your skills as a miner are now complete...indeed you are powerful as CCP Devs have foreseen... |

Sycotic Deninard
Polaris Breach Corp
20
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 04:24:00 -
[306] - Quote
Interesting changes for the Caracal. On one hand it looks like its getting a much needed buff but on the other hand it looks like Heavy Missiles are getting nerfed. I guess we will have to see how the weapon platform pans out to see if this ship is going to be viable or not. Im not going to hold my breath as many in the game want to see missile boats dissapear completely including the devs. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
289
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 04:59:00 -
[307] - Quote
OT Smithers wrote: Get serious :)
Almost no one is using the HML Caracal today, and for bloody good reason. Now they are talking a 20% damage nerf plus the addition of added damage reduction in the form of TD's...
Fixed that for you. The Caracal is the supreme anti-frigate cruiser platform only challenged by the RF Stabber .. if some tweaks are made, in particular to HAM fittings, the Caracal of tomorrow will indeed be a wolf among sheep and will have unsurpassed flexibility (RoF bonus description).
TD spam has been on the increase for some time, especially in low-sec/FW, and missile user will need to compensate for that .. but we gun toting maniacs have been living with TDs since birth and are still around and still flying our gunships.
That said: Suggested TD changes will hurt solo/small-gang to no end so something has to be done to soften the blow. Not sure when/what the eWar revision is but in the meantime I think that giving TDs the ECM treatment (reduce mod effect, increase hull bonus) is the only way to make it work as is .. the spam will be horrendous and the cries for help will equal that of 'becauseoffalcon' as combat becomes boring to the extreme with winning hulls all having minimum of 4 mids (prop, tackle, TD ) |

Michael Harari
The Hatchery Team Liquid
315
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 05:08:00 -
[308] - Quote
Veshta Yoshida wrote:That said: Suggested TD changes will hurt solo/small-gang to no end so something has to be done to soften the blow. Not sure when/what the eWar revision is but in the meantime I think that giving TDs the ECM treatment (reduce mod effect, increase hull bonus) is the only way to make it work as is .. the spam will be horrendous and the cries for help will equal that of 'becauseoffalcon' as combat becomes boring to the extreme with winning hulls all having minimum of 4 mids (prop, tackle, TD  )
I had a roam through FW space yesterday in my retribution, and the only things I found to fight me were sentinels, cynabals and swarms of TD firetails. |

Soon Shin
Caucasian Culture Club Transmission Lost
134
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 05:58:00 -
[309] - Quote
The thorax needs more powergrid, other wise people will just say **** it and shield tank it.
The omen is the odd ship out of them all because it is stuck with slow armor tanking. Attack ships are supposed to be fast and mobile ships, the omen goes against this philosophy since it is pigeonholed into armor tanking. |

Vladimir Norkoff
Income Redistribution Service
56
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 06:57:00 -
[310] - Quote
OT Smithers wrote: Get serious :)
Almost no one is using the Caracal today, and for bloody good reason. Now they are talking a 20% damage nerf plus the addition of added damage reduction in the form of TD's.
You have a mediocre tank, DPS half that of an AF, no neut, two small drones, and it's not even particularly fast.... What exactly are you gonna kill with it?
Again, people aren't using it NOW. Why in God's name would they use it when every other cruiser and frigate in the game just got significantly better while this ship got nerfed? Naw. they are totally serious. The Crapacal is gonna be a long distance BEAST! According to these forums you just need to pair it up with a rapier and an Arazu to keep your target in place. 'Course why you wouldn't bring an Oracle or Naga in that situation is beyond me. But apparently the Crapacal will be awesome in that situation. EvE-Forums told me so.
Soon Shin wrote:The caracal should have a 25 m3 drone bay. Reduce the mass on the caracal as well, I don't see why it should be heavier than gallente ship. Cuz every ship should have a full flight of drones. Especially Caldari!
|
|

Tomcio FromFarAway
Singularity's Edge
212
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 07:17:00 -
[311] - Quote
Soon Shin wrote: The caracal should have a 25 m3 drone bay. Reduce the mass on the caracal as well, I don't see why it should be heavier than gallente ship.
[roleplaying] As a Gallente I find it offensive to give them filthy Caldari more drones [/roleplaying]
Seriously no, we will have too many ships with small drone bays ( usually used for ECM I fear ). Drones everywhere. Besides it's a missile boat, it doesn't need drones to hit smaller targets like gun boats.
More mass == smaller boost to speed when using AB or MWD.
You can't expect Caldari missile boats to be nearly as fast as Gallente when you can spew missiles from afar while we need to get very close to do anything meaningful in most cases. |

Alara IonStorm
3180
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 07:36:00 -
[312] - Quote
Soon Shin wrote: The omen is the odd ship out of them all because it is stuck with slow armor tanking. Attack ships are supposed to be fast and mobile ships, the omen goes against this philosophy since it is pigeonholed into armor tanking.
It should be pigeonholed into Armor Tanking, the real question is why as an Armor Ship its strength is lacking then fix that instead of cramming shield extenders on it.
I am gonna bet no one will be saying fix the new Moa you are pigeonholing it into shields, it is supposed to be a heavy combat cruiser. An Armor Attack Cruiser should have good speed but a bit less then Shield to utilize the combination of good speed and small sig.
Soon Shin wrote: The stabber should have 5 turrets and a 25 m3 drone bay, remove one or both missile slots.
Amen.
The caracal should have a 25 m3 drone bay. Reduce the mass on the caracal as well, I don't see why it should be heavier than gallente ship.[/quote] 20m3 would be nice for a HAM version and missions.
I think it should go:
Gal: 50m3 Amr: 40m3 Min: 30m3 Cal: 20m3
For attack Cruisers.
Honestly I would push it a bit further for the Thorax. 75m3 Drone Bay + 50 Bandwidth.
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:Cuz every ship should have a full flight of drones. Especially Caldari!
Around a full flight sure once you get into Cruiser territory. Their Drone Bays on Combat Ships should be in the area of magnitude of the Tier 1 and 2 Battlecruisers who use the same size weapons. |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
200
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 07:49:00 -
[313] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:CCP Fozzie, Can you look at the following T2 charges for winter too Hail -50% Range 0.7x tracking Void -25% range 0.75x tracking Conflagration -50% range 0.7x tracking These are all close range charges and they all have a penalty to tracking as well as range, any chance the tracking penalty could be adjusted to a tracking bonus? no please; there should be a reason to use the navy ammo over the T2.
T2 adds additional damage at the cost of tracking, faction ammo adds less damage and doesnt take away from your tracking . . . problem? |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
200
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 07:53:00 -
[314] - Quote
Soon Shin wrote:Reduce the mass on the caracal as well, I don't see why it should be heavier than gallente ship. blaster optimal = 3.6 km heavy missile optimal = 63 km Caracal = Range bonus
questions? |

Tomcio FromFarAway
Singularity's Edge
212
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 08:11:00 -
[315] - Quote
Yes, one. What is your favourite colour?
|

Iyica de Tylmarand
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 08:53:00 -
[316] - Quote
The will the bonus changes flow through to HACs? I.e. will the Deimos get a tracking bonus and will the Vagabond get two fall off bonuses? Or will HACs be dealt with in a seperate patch?
Also, if the missile changes are implemented, HML caracals I feel will be left behind. Yes additional BCUs will make up for the damage nerf of HMs, but that just means it stays roughly the same while all the other t1 cruisers get buffed. Frig killing Rapid Light Caracals on the other hand will see significantly more use. |

Takeshi Yamato
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
460
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 08:55:00 -
[317] - Quote
Iyica de Tylmarand wrote:The will the bonus changes flow through to HACs? I.e. will the Deimos get a tracking bonus and will the Vagabond get two fall off bonuses? Or will HACs be dealt with in a seperate patch?
Also, if the missile changes are implemented, HML caracals I feel will be left behind. Yes additional BCUs will make up for the damage nerf of HMs, but that just means it stays roughly the same while all the other t1 cruisers get buffed. Frig killing Rapid Light Caracals on the other hand will see significantly more use.
How will the Caracal fall behind? HMLs are still good compared to other long range weapon systems.
It is unrealistic to expect HMLs to compete with close range weapon systems at close ranges.
|

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
200
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 09:08:00 -
[318] - Quote
Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:Yes, one. What is your favourite colour? blue . . .
wait i mean yellooOOOOoooooooo . . . |

Alara IonStorm
3180
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 09:21:00 -
[319] - Quote
Sigras wrote:Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:Yes, one. What is your favourite colour? blue . . . wait i mean yellooOOOOoooooooo . . . You should really wait until they are finished rebalancing colours to decide this. |

Tomcio FromFarAway
Singularity's Edge
212
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 09:22:00 -
[320] - Quote
Sigras wrote:Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:Yes, one. What is your favourite colour? blue . . . wait i mean yellooOOOOoooooooo . . .
Damn.
I was about to ask about air speed velocity of unladen swallow next. Maybe next time. |
|

Iyica de Tylmarand
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
6
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 09:26:00 -
[321] - Quote
Takeshi Yamato wrote:Iyica de Tylmarand wrote:The will the bonus changes flow through to HACs? I.e. will the Deimos get a tracking bonus and will the Vagabond get two fall off bonuses? Or will HACs be dealt with in a seperate patch?
Also, if the missile changes are implemented, HML caracals I feel will be left behind. Yes additional BCUs will make up for the damage nerf of HMs, but that just means it stays roughly the same while all the other t1 cruisers get buffed. Frig killing Rapid Light Caracals on the other hand will see significantly more use. How will the Caracal fall behind? HMLs are still good compared to other long range weapon systems. It is unrealistic to expect HMLs to compete with close range weapon systems at close ranges. The reason why people (or at least myself) expect HMLs to compete with other close range weapons systems is because unfortunately the HAM falls short in that comparison. If HAMs were given a slight buff, then I'd be fine with this. But if the other thread about the missile changes is to be believed, that isn't happening thus far. |

Gelvina
Temnava Legion TEMNAVA
1
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 09:28:00 -
[322] - Quote
Nalha Saldana wrote:Gelvina wrote:From a skill entry point to these ships I believe the stabber is the hardest to train for. (for noobs that is offcourse)
firstly you need to train up to tech2 medium autocannons to get barrage. Which already requires a lot of time for a new player I think (was a long time ago) Now to properly fly it you require descent missile skills as well?
I know minmatar is in many ships guns+missiles and I like that. But for this stabber wouldn't it make more sense to maybe give it 1 more turret slot? I mean its the baby brother to the vaga and you don't need missiles for the vagabond.
Am I making sense?
The other cruisers gets 5 bonused turrets and the stabber gets 4 + 2 missile launchers, if you want to give it a fifth slot you will have to remove the launcher altogether to balance it and that just makes it the same as the others. I like this mix and think it should stay. Remember that 4 turrets + 2 neuts is also very powerful.
I suppose your right. I guess 2 badly skilled tech1 launchers can make up for not having a 5th turret. (compared to low skilled turrets at least) And then at good skills stabber becomes quite good with 4 guns + 2 launchers.
At 285 velocity this little stabber will be awesome!
|

Dr Sheng-Ji Yang
The Forsworn Protectorate Imperial Protectorate
6
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 10:16:00 -
[323] - Quote
Quote:Nalha Saldana wrote: Gelvina wrote: From a skill entry point to these ships I believe the stabber is the hardest to train for. (for noobs that is offcourse)
firstly you need to train up to tech2 medium autocannons to get barrage. Which already requires a lot of time for a new player I think (was a long time ago) Now to properly fly it you require descent missile skills as well?
I know minmatar is in many ships guns+missiles and I like that. But for this stabber wouldn't it make more sense to maybe give it 1 more turret slot? I mean its the baby brother to the vaga and you don't need missiles for the vagabond.
Am I making sense?
The other cruisers gets 5 bonused turrets and the stabber gets 4 + 2 missile launchers, if you want to give it a fifth slot you will have to remove the launcher altogether to balance it and that just makes it the same as the others. I like this mix and think it should stay. Remember that 4 turrets + 2 neuts is also very powerful.]
What you miss is that the stabber has probably another role than the other cruisers. It is more a big frigate than a cruiser and I also suppose that it is either designed to kite other cruisers or to kill frigs (especially T2 slow ones). It is not meant to stand face to face against another cruisers. I have to admit that speed is unbelievable important in PVP an CCP misses it often. The new stabber will be superb. For example: Did you ever tried to kill a dram? Haha. Either you get killed or it simply burns away. |

Alara IonStorm
3180
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 10:31:00 -
[324] - Quote
Dr Sheng-Ji Yang wrote: What you miss is that the stabber has probably another role than the other cruisers. It is more a big frigate than a cruiser and I also suppose that it is either designed to kite other cruisers or to kill frigs (especially T2 slow ones). It is not meant to stand face to face against another cruisers. I have to admit that speed is unbelievable important in PVP an CCP misses it often. The new stabber will be superb. For example: Did you ever tried to kill a dram? Haha. Either you get killed or it simply burns away.
Yeah with 5 turrets and a Drone Bay it could not stand toe to toe with any of these Cruisers. People from using Double DPS Bonused Medium Projectiles have somehow gotten the mistaken idea that they can do a lot of Dmg. The Stabber has been pretty much unused and it has not received a speed increase at all, only all of its competition has, it is just to low Dmg to really see a lot of use.
This thing is going to be 300 or so DPS and lose some of that in falloff, the new Bellicose or if CCP which said they are not changing much on it the Rupture will be the main Minmatar Kiters despite the lower speed. I don't mind if they cut a little speed from the thing because Dmg is what it needs. It won't come close to the other 3 with a proper Drone Bay and 5th Turret, but it will be usable at the least.
|

Dr Sheng-Ji Yang
The Forsworn Protectorate Imperial Protectorate
6
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 10:42:00 -
[325] - Quote
Quote:Yeah with 5 turrets and a Drone Bay it could not stand toe to toe with any of these Cruisers. People from using Double DPS Bonused Medium Projectiles have somehow gotten the mistaken idea that they can do a lot of Dmg. The Stabber has been pretty much unused and it has not received a speed increase at all, only all of its competition has, it is just to low Dmg to really see a lot of use.
This thing is going to be 300 or so DPS and lose some of that in falloff, the new Bellicose or if CCP which said they are not changing much on it the Rupture will be the main Minmatar Kiters despite the lower speed. It won't come close in Dmg to the other 3 with a proper Drone Bay and 5th Turret, but it will be usable at the least.
I don't mind if they cut a little speed from the thing if they have too in exchange for a bit of Dmg. I would rather have that then a redux of what we have now that is only slightly better but used for the most part.
What the hell? 300dps and this speed would be far too much. For example the NEW caracal can be happy if it can do 350 dps with HAMs in a really tight fit (2 reactor control unit 2, 2 ballistic control sys) without THAT speed. |

Gypsio III
Chemikals Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
361
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 10:55:00 -
[326] - Quote
Dr Sheng-Ji Yang wrote:What the hell? 300dps and this speed would be far too much. For example the NEW caracal can be happy if it can do 350 dps with HAMs in a really tight fit (2 reactor control unit 2, 2 ballistic control sys) without THAT speed.
Not quite sure what you're saying about future Caracal here, but it will be able to fit HAMs, MWD and LSE with a single ACR, for 396 DPS excluding drones (CN, triple BCS). |

Dr Sheng-Ji Yang
The Forsworn Protectorate Imperial Protectorate
6
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 11:01:00 -
[327] - Quote
Quote:Not quite sure what you're saying about future Caracal here, but it will be able to fit HAMs, MWD and LSE with a single ACR, for 396 DPS excluding drones (CN, triple BCS).
If you like suicidal paper tank then yes. |

Gypsio III
Chemikals Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
361
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 11:03:00 -
[328] - Quote
Try fewer LSEs and more TDs. |

Pinky Denmark
The Cursed Navy
212
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 11:07:00 -
[329] - Quote
As a fast cruiser being good at chasing down frigates and destroyers I think a 20 or 25 m3 drone limit would be excellent. 4-5 light drones is a serious thing, that doesn't step into Gallente territory too much (Gallente cruisers almost all use 4-5 medium drones) |

Alara IonStorm
3180
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 11:29:00 -
[330] - Quote
Dr Sheng-Ji Yang wrote: What the hell? 300dps and this speed would be far too much. For example the NEW caracal can be happy if it can do 350 dps with HAMs in a really tight fit (2 reactor control unit 2, 2 ballistic control sys) without THAT speed.
Take a look at the stats you only need 1 RCU or ACR to fit a rack of HAM's + MWD + LSE and your paper DPS is forgetting falloff not to mention the Caracals greater range in general.
That aside pop over to the EWAR thread and take a gander at the Bellicose with 4 Launchers and a 40m3 Drone Bay with greater speed then the Caracal.
Dr Sheng-Ji Yang wrote: If you like suicidal paper tank then yes.
Stronger then the Stabber. It already has the speed now and surprise no one is using it. People use the Rupture to kite.
I don't mind if they keep the weapons layout so much as give it a Rupture sized drone bay. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 35 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |