| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5  :: [one page] | 
      
      
        | Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) | 
      
      
        |  Dread Operative
 Justified Chaos
 
 18
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 16:31:00 -
          [1] - Quote 
 Remove the tier rewards from FW missions. Right now you can get a ******** amount of LP by doing missions while not affecting warzone control at all. So you get more LP with less risk. Removing the tier system for missions benefit those who fight in plexs and bust bunkers and will rise the prices of the current crashed and flooded FW market, letting the PVP'ers earn more.
 | 
      
      
        |  IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
 Angry Mustellid
 Iron Oxide.
 
 268
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 16:35:00 -
          [2] - Quote 
 
 Dread Operative wrote:Remove the tier rewards from FW missions. Right now you can get a ******** amount of LP by doing missions while not affecting warzone control at all. So you get more LP with less risk. Removing the tier system for missions benefit those who fight in plexs and bust bunkers and will rise the prices of the current crashed and flooded FW market, letting the PVP'ers earn more. 
 What about the PVPers who run missions?
 | 
      
      
        |  Dread Operative
 Justified Chaos
 
 18
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 17:26:00 -
          [3] - Quote 
 You still shouldn't be able to make 300k+ LP an hour, any way you look at it.
 | 
      
      
        |  Princess Nexxala
 Quantum Cats Syndicate
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 162
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 20:37:00 -
          [4] - Quote 
 I agree mission should be removed from FW
 QCATs is recruiting
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146180
 | 
      
      
        |  IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
 Angry Mustellid
 Iron Oxide.
 
 268
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 20:45:00 -
          [5] - Quote 
 
 Dread Operative wrote:You still shouldn't be able to make 300k+ LP an hour, any way you look at it. 
 because...?
 
 
 I agree missions should be more of a conflict driver which I think is how they were intended and I hate farmers as much as anyone else but I don't think you can just say 'You shouldn't be able to make 300k LP/hr from missions'
 
 Also missions have always been far more profitable than plexing, it seems odd that this is brought up now, not 6 months ago.
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 606
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 20:50:00 -
          [6] - Quote 
 
 IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote:It was brought up, but not emphasized because Missions take effort. After Inferno and before this latest patch offensive plexes didn't require any real effort.Also missions have always been far more profitable than plexing, it seems odd that this is brought up now, not 6 months ago. 
 Now that plexes take effort again, the disparity is clear for all to see.
 
 The LP multiplier for missions is rubbish. And yes, making 310k LP/hour for an activity that doesn't help the occupancy war is not right.
 | 
      
      
        |  chatgris
 Quantum Cats Syndicate
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 236
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 21:13:00 -
          [7] - Quote 
 Missions have a purpose - to pay a side that has won.
 
 Make missions failable by the opposing faction in a reasonable timeframe (not I camped it for 13 hrs yay it expired).
 
 Then you could possibly adjust the payout multiplier. But at least there's a chance it can be failed instead of "oh, moving on ignoring that missions for an hour will come back when pvper is bored while I do my other missions" advantage that missioning currently has.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cromwell Savage
 Quantum Cats Syndicate
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 89
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 21:18:00 -
          [8] - Quote 
 I've never had a problem with missions due to the very fact they have no impact on "sov". Still don't.
 
 
 
 It's plexes that I wish were removed from FW all together. If I wanted to play sov wars, I'd move to dull-sec....
 | 
      
      
        |  Deen Wispa
 Justified Chaos
 
 360
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 21:25:00 -
          [9] - Quote 
 >>>In recognition of your successful completion of the mission 'Dead Men Tell No Tales' to aid the cause of our militia, Federal Defense Union grants you 80,694 loyalty points.
 
 
 This is too much LP. I agree with Dread; get rid of tier rewards for missions. It's mostly just farmers freeloading off of the work of those who affect WZ control.
 Gallente FW Blog http://iamsheriff.com/blog
 C'est La Eve :)
 | 
      
      
        |  Flyingleanpocket
 Amarrian Vengeance
 
 6
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 21:33:00 -
          [10] - Quote 
 
 Deen Wispa wrote:>>>In recognition of your successful completion of the mission 'Dead Men Tell No Tales' to aid the cause of our militia, Federal Defense Union grants you 80,694 loyalty points.
 control.
 
 
 Holy Megathron Navy Issues Batman! App Incoming!
 | 
      
      
        |  Destru Kaneda
 CTRL-Q
 Iron Oxide.
 
 121
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 21:47:00 -
          [11] - Quote 
 
 Princess Nexxala wrote:I agree mission should be removed from FW 
 What she said.
 
 Music for robots, geeks, hackers, and nerds.
 Nerdiest homepage on the internet?
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 606
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 23:22:00 -
          [12] - Quote 
 Our Navy Domis will blot out the sun!
 | 
      
      
        |  Jack Togenada
 State War Academy
 Caldari State
 
 5
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.09 23:39:00 -
          [13] - Quote 
 They're going to modify the missions once they get done with the plex changes. Missions don't really fit into the overall setup of things, but they're a lot less boring than plexing.
 | 
      
      
        |  Sura Sadiva
 Entropic Tactical Crew
 
 27
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 00:56:00 -
          [14] - Quote 
 Missions can be:
 
 1. A resource for fighters. In this case makes sense to have it linked to the tier: more terrirotrial control = more resources and benefits (aka: consequences). But since loosing systems already penalize preventing the access to agents then misison (less warzone control = less resources. Consequences) could also be adjusted on a flat payout and to be not linked to tiers.
 
 
 2. Fights drivers. In this case should be totally redesigned to make them more an engagment occasion, more "risky" andd also viable/profittable with proper PvP ships, and not just in SB.
 
 
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Bad Messenger
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 289
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 02:15:00 -
          [15] - Quote 
 Hey , do not cry about FW missions.
 
 Those are just what players wanted. On original FW version no one did those missions, but then comes militia CSM candidates who wanted good income for FW players to make isk for pvp, and we sure made isk after several boosts.
 
 Sad thing is that no one has done any pvp after that.
 | 
      
      
        |  Vordak Kallager
 Autocannons Anonymous
 Late Night Alliance
 
 482
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 03:18:00 -
          [16] - Quote 
 
 Bad Messenger wrote:Hey , do not cry about FW missions.
 Those are just what players wanted. On original FW version no one did those missions, but then comes militia CSM candidates who wanted good income for FW players to make isk for pvp, and we sure made isk after several boosts.
 
 Sad thing is that no one has done any pvp after that.
 
 No one did missions in pre-Inferno? What are you smoking?
 Sa souvraya niende misain ye.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 640
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 03:30:00 -
          [17] - Quote 
 I don't see what plexing has to do with pvp any more than missions. Both give a beacon people in the system can see. At least missions force you in a certain system. Plexing you can choose to go hide in any empty system you want.
 
 Perhaps someday plexing will be a pvp activity and then I will agree that the rewards should be adjusted.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Damar Rocarion
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 178
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 05:34:00 -
          [18] - Quote 
 
 Vordak Kallager wrote:No one did missions in pre-Inferno? What are you smoking?  
 he is referring to "old times" when missions gave crappy lp and actual conversion ratio in lp store was pretty bad. Then came Gallente sponsored Ankh CSM and that's pretty much the moment FW started going wrong.
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Schalac
 Apocalypse Reign
 
 123
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 06:32:00 -
          [19] - Quote 
 
 Damar Rocarion wrote:Vordak Kallager wrote:No one did missions in pre-Inferno? What are you smoking?  he is referring to "old times" when missions gave crappy lp and actual conversion ratio in lp store was pretty bad. Then came Gallente sponsored Ankh CSM and that's pretty much the moment FW started going wrong. You mean the moment that everyone and their mother joined Cal Mil to farm missions and then used the inflated numbers that the change brought to champion more changes because of the so called "imbalance" of "players" on the caldari side.
 
 
 Sounds a lot like the amarr for the last few months doesn't it.
 | 
      
      
        |  IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
 Angry Mustellid
 Iron Oxide.
 
 268
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 09:51:00 -
          [20] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:The LP multiplier for missions is rubbish. And yes, making 310k LP/hour for an activity that doesn't help the occupancy war is not right. 
 Ok accepting your first few points here, but this is just silly, what if 310k LP is only worth 10m? do you still have a problem with it then? There seems to be an attitude of 'OMG big number, that must be wrong' Even though mission runners are now earning a small fraction of what was possible pre-patch.
 
 Since when did LP have to be about occupancy, it has only been a blink of the eye in FW history where they had any relation what so ever and now suddenly they are strictly tied. I'd rather LP was completely separate then the farmers don't ruin the occupancy war.
 
 
 Deen Wispa wrote:This is too much LP. It has had an negative impact on the Gallente FW store as well. Practically everything has tanked.  
 Wow. It's almost like the market is regulating the amount people earn based on the availability of LP.
 
 
 
 
 In this thread: Lots of people who base their arguments on 100k LP worth 1k /LP is different to 25k LP worth 4k/LP.
 
 And no I haven't run a mission since the update and I don't have much intention to do so.
 | 
      
      
        |  Schalac
 Apocalypse Reign
 
 124
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 11:21:00 -
          [21] - Quote 
 
 IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote:Deen Wispa wrote:This is too much LP. It has had an negative impact on the Gallente FW store as well. Practically everything has tanked.  Wow. It's almost like the market is regulating the amount people earn based on the availability of LP. No, what it is, is all the '1337' PvP'ers complaining because they aren't making as much money as they were before inferno from running their missions. It is a simple case of buyers remorse. They championed change because they couldn't compete with the CALALT army in the first iteration of FW change, and they are crying again because now their LP isn't worth as much as when missions were the only way to gain LP.
 
 Here is a hint Deen, EVERYTHING has tanked and you have only your factions crying and complaining to blame.
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 642
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 11:46:00 -
          [22] - Quote 
 
 Schalac wrote:Damar Rocarion wrote:Vordak Kallager wrote:No one did missions in pre-Inferno? What are you smoking?  he is referring to "old times" when missions gave crappy lp and actual conversion ratio in lp store was pretty bad. Then came Gallente sponsored Ankh CSM and that's pretty much the moment FW started going wrong. You mean the moment that everyone and their mother joined Cal Mil to farm missions and then used the inflated numbers that the change brought to champion more changes because of the so called "imbalance" of "players" on the caldari side.  Sounds a lot like the amarr for the last few months doesn't it. 
 
 I don't know about other amarr. But this amarr always prefered economic balance and the good fights it brings, over trillions of isk making the war lopsided.
 
 We could have had everything pvp, money to pvp, and balance. But CCP started out by just throwing tons of money at their new feature before making mechanics changes to increase the balance and pvp. This brought some exta pvp due to the sheer number of people farming isk in the same place. But now that the isk is drying up and most of the noobs are leaving we just have an unbalanced war with a bunch of other changes casual pvpers hate. Null style station lock outs, and soon we will have to spam the dscan button like the oc wh dwellers everytime we run a plex in a busy system.
 
 Lets face it, all our hopes that ccp would turn fw plexing into this awesome crazy pvp mechanic were completely misguided. Instead of making plexing a pvp mechanic they turned it into a more annoying form of pve.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Schalac
 Apocalypse Reign
 
 124
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 12:39:00 -
          [23] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:Schalac wrote:Damar Rocarion wrote:Vordak Kallager wrote:No one did missions in pre-Inferno? What are you smoking?  he is referring to "old times" when missions gave crappy lp and actual conversion ratio in lp store was pretty bad. Then came Gallente sponsored Ankh CSM and that's pretty much the moment FW started going wrong. You mean the moment that everyone and their mother joined Cal Mil to farm missions and then used the inflated numbers that the change brought to champion more changes because of the so called "imbalance" of "players" on the caldari side.  Sounds a lot like the amarr for the last few months doesn't it. I don't know about other amarr. But this amarr always prefered economic balance and the good fights it brings, over trillions of isk making the war lopsided.  We could have had everything pvp, money to pvp, and balance. But CCP started out by just throwing tons of money at their new feature before making mechanics changes to increase the balance and pvp. This brought some exta pvp due to the sheer number of people farming isk in the same place. But now that the isk is drying up and most of the noobs are leaving we just have an unbalanced war with a bunch of other changes casual pvpers hate. Null style station lock outs, and soon we will have to spam the dscan button like the oc wh dwellers everytime we run a plex in a busy system.  Lets face it, all our hopes that ccp would turn fw plexing into this awesome crazy pvp mechanic were completely misguided. Instead of making plexing a pvp mechanic they turned it into a more annoying form of pve.  Except that the way the plex mechanic worked at the start of Inferno was the same mechanic that was around for years. All they did was added LP for completing them. How people thought that this was going to drive more PvP is beyond me. There was a thread in 2010 or 2009 about how to fix plexing and before there was even talk about getting LP for it that was like 20+ pages. Yet CCP, as always, took a look at the main complaint, the frogs saying that there is no point in plexing because it doesn't mean anything and you get nothing from it, and they were plenty vocal about it too. While all of the good ideas are tossed aside and look who is the main ones complaining again...those damned frogs. Except this time they are complaining that it is too easy to make LP.
 
 I just can't wait to see what is going to happen when DUST starts to count towards system control as well. I wonder if you will get LP that will be transferable to EVE items.
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 607
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 13:59:00 -
          [24] - Quote 
 
 IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote:31 Federation Navy Comets will always be worth more than 100 million isk - to me. However, I get your point - I just don't think it applies in this case.Ok accepting your first few points here, but this is just silly, what if 310k LP is only worth 10m? do you still have a problem with it then? There seems to be an attitude of 'OMG big number, that must be wrong' Even though mission runners are now earning a small fraction of what was possible pre-patch.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 642
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 15:08:00 -
          [25] - Quote 
 While I don't blame frogs or any particular faction it is true that ccp just threw isk at fw as opposed to changing the actual plex dmechanic to make it less pve and more pvp.
 
 Some frogs like chatgris warned against that approach.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 607
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 16:52:00 -
          [26] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:While I don't blame frogs or any particular faction it is true that ccp just threw isk at fw as opposed to changing the actual plex dmechanic to make it less pve and more pvp.
 Some frogs like chatgris warned against that approach.
 *sigh* please log in and play the game.
 | 
      
      
        |  chatgris
 Quantum Cats Syndicate
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 236
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.10 17:38:00 -
          [27] - Quote 
 
 IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote:X Gallentius wrote:The LP multiplier for missions is rubbish. And yes, making 310k LP/hour for an activity that doesn't help the occupancy war is not right. Ok accepting your first few points here, but this is just silly, what if 310k LP is only worth 10m? do you still have a problem with it then?  
 Yes - because mission running is a purely pve activity, no way for the opposing side to fail your mission (you can reject the one pickup missions that pays crap), and it makes far far more LP than the pvp activities (plexing).
 
 It is EXACTLY because the market adjusts that this is a problem.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 643
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 14:14:00 -
          [28] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:While I don't blame frogs or any particular faction it is true that ccp just threw isk at fw as opposed to changing the actual plex dmechanic to make it less pve and more pvp.
 Some frogs like chatgris warned against that approach.
 *sigh* please log in and play the game.  
 
 I did. Last time I roamed for about an hour in a merlin. I was willing to fight some afs, any destroyers and most navy frigates and of course other t1 frigates. No fights. A comet in a plex ran from me and I warped from a plex when and enemy altron, firetail and catalyst landed. The time before that I roamed for about an hour and got one so so fight. Another time before that I roamed for about 1.5 hours and got 1 fight.
 
 This is barely better - if at all - than pre inferno. There was a time right after inferno when I could get 3-7 fights per 2 hours. Thats pretty much no longer the case. The only thing they did to increase the fights in fw was throw allot of isk at it and thereby increase the number of people per system. Now that the isk has dried up, it's the same as ever.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
 Angry Mustellid
 Iron Oxide.
 
 269
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 14:33:00 -
          [29] - Quote 
 
 chatgris wrote:Yes - because mission running is a purely pve activity, no way for the opposing side to fail your mission (you can reject the one pickup missions that pays crap), and it makes far far more LP than the pvp activities (plexing). 
 Fair enough, I always understood it as LP from kills and plexing where just to help you along with the intention of missions being an income source.
 
 I still maintain it would be better if none of it gave LP and missions were the only income source, funnily enough that was when plexing gave the best fights. At least then you could ignore people who were farming and you knew when someone was plexing they wanted a fight, now the two are far too blurred.
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 607
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 14:39:00 -
          [30] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:You must be the worst solo roamer in the history of Eve. Seriously.I did. Last time I roamed for about an hour in a merlin. I was willing to fight some afs, any destroyers and most navy frigates and of course other t1 frigates. No fights.  | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 643
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 14:40:00 -
          [31] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:I did. Last time I roamed for about an hour in a merlin. I was willing to fight some afs, any destroyers and most navy frigates and of course other t1 frigates. No fights.  You must be the worst solo roamer in the history of Eve. Seriously. 
 
 How many decent fights are you getting per 2 hours of a solo roam?
 
 Edit: and were you getting more than 3-7 decent fights per 2 hours right after inferno?
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Damar Rocarion
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 178
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 15:50:00 -
          [32] - Quote 
 Of course frogs want nerf to mission LP so we cannot use our alts to take advantage of their CCP sponsored high-tier and engage in asymmetrical warfare by dumping down the value of their LP.
 | 
      
      
        |  Schalac
 Apocalypse Reign
 
 129
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 16:51:00 -
          [33] - Quote 
 HTFU
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 607
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 17:21:00 -
          [34] - Quote 
 
 Damar Rocarion wrote:Exactly. That's why. We all hate Damar and try to find any reason we can to ruin his isk making activities.Of course frogs want nerf to mission LP so we cannot use our alts to take advantage of their CCP sponsored high-tier and engage in asymmetrical warfare by dumping down the value of their LP. 
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 607
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 17:31:00 -
          [35] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:I did. Last time I roamed for about an hour in a merlin. I was willing to fight some afs, any destroyers and most navy frigates and of course other t1 frigates. No fights.  You must be the worst solo roamer in the history of Eve. Seriously. How many decent fights are you getting per 2 hours of a solo roam?  Edit: and were you getting more than 3-7 decent fights per 2 hours right after inferno? I can get into a fight within 10 minutes of undocking.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 643
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 17:55:00 -
          [36] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:I did. Last time I roamed for about an hour in a merlin. I was willing to fight some afs, any destroyers and most navy frigates and of course other t1 frigates. No fights.  You must be the worst solo roamer in the history of Eve. Seriously. How many decent fights are you getting per 2 hours of a solo roam?  Edit: and were you getting more than 3-7 decent fights per 2 hours right after inferno? I can get into a fight within 10 minutes of undocking.  
 You are claiming you can get a decent solo fight within 10 minutes of signing on?
  
 
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Dread Operative
 Justified Chaos
 
 20
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 19:07:00 -
          [37] - Quote 
 
 Damar Rocarion wrote:Of course frogs want nerf to mission LP so we cannot use our alts to take advantage of their CCP sponsored high-tier and engage in asymmetrical warfare by dumping down the value of their LP. 
 Use your alt to plex then you ninny. The reason is to stabilize FW item prices. Or how about you use your main, AND TAKE SOME SYSTEMS!!!!! Gasp!!!!
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 607
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 19:19:00 -
          [38] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:I did. Last time I roamed for about an hour in a merlin. I was willing to fight some afs, any destroyers and most navy frigates and of course other t1 frigates. No fights.  You must be the worst solo roamer in the history of Eve. Seriously. How many decent fights are you getting per 2 hours of a solo roam?  Edit: and were you getting more than 3-7 decent fights per 2 hours right after inferno? I can get into a fight within 10 minutes of undocking.  You are claiming you can get a decent solo fight within 10 minutes of signing on?   Yes, but that's because I choose to engage people even if they have an initial advantage, even if it's 1 vs multiple targets. But YMMV. Since comets are cheap - even though I've done this with comets before Inferno, during inferno, and now after this latest patch, so inb4 you're "You're at Tier 4 so you can afford to have fun" whine post.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 643
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 19:31:00 -
          [39] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Edit: and were you getting more than 3-7 decent fights per 2 hours right after inferno?
 I can get into a fight within 10 minutes of undocking.  You are claiming you can get a decent solo fight within 10 minutes of signing on?   Yes, but that's because I choose to engage people even if they have an initial advantage, even if it's 1 vs multiple targets. But YMMV. Since comets are cheap - even though I've done this with comets before Inferno, during inferno, and now after this latest patch, so inb4 you're "You're at Tier 4 so you can afford to have fun" whine post. 
 
 I don't have a problem engaging versus multiple targets either. But I only occassionally suicide my ships.
 
 XG your claim that you find decent solo pvp fights every 10 minutes just demonstrates how removed from reality your view is.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Dread Operative
 Justified Chaos
 
 20
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 20:06:00 -
          [40] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Edit: and were you getting more than 3-7 decent fights per 2 hours right after inferno?
 I can get into a fight within 10 minutes of undocking.  You are claiming you can get a decent solo fight within 10 minutes of signing on?   Yes, but that's because I choose to engage people even if they have an initial advantage, even if it's 1 vs multiple targets. But YMMV. Since comets are cheap - even though I've done this with comets before Inferno, during inferno, and now after this latest patch, so inb4 you're "You're at Tier 4 so you can afford to have fun" whine post. I don't have a problem engaging versus multiple targets either. But I only occassionally suicide my ships.  XG your claim that you find decent solo pvp fights every 10 minutes just demonstrates how removed from reality your view is.  
 Or yours. And he didn't say every, he said within 10 min. Its not that hard, do a minor in Eha. The fights roll in.
 | 
      
      
        |  chatgris
 Quantum Cats Syndicate
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 236
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 20:12:00 -
          [41] - Quote 
 
 IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote:chatgris wrote:Yes - because mission running is a purely pve activity, no way for the opposing side to fail your mission (you can reject the one pickup missions that pays crap), and it makes far far more LP than the pvp activities (plexing). Fair enough, I always understood it as LP from kills and plexing where just to help you along with the intention of missions being an income source. I still maintain it would be better if none of it gave LP and missions were the only income source, funnily enough that was when plexing gave the best fights. At least then you could ignore people who were farming and you knew when someone was plexing they wanted a fight, now the two are far too blurred. 
 My ideal is not to have "farming" and "pvp" be separate activities, but to make ISK while pvping, so that boring farming isn't required (and farming is boring both the person farming, and the person who's trying to pvp).
 
 It pretty much boils down to more people in pvp ships more of the time means more pvp.
 | 
      
      
        |  IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
 Angry Mustellid
 Iron Oxide.
 
 269
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.11 21:00:00 -
          [42] - Quote 
 
 chatgris wrote:It pretty much boils down to more people in pvp ships more of the time means more pvp. 
 Of course that is the ideal, I just don't think it is really viable. Hence I'm happy to accept the next best option where at least farming doesn't have a negative impact on PVP.
 
 A) PVP pays for itself and yields GFs, but somehow farmers can't ruin it
 B) PVPers PVP and farmers farm through 2 separate mechanics
 C) Farmers inundate the 'PVP' areas for profit resulting in everyone being bored.
 
 We have taken the step up from C to B, but I don't see how you can get A without people exploiting it. I don't see why we need to be paid for PVP anyway, it's not like that is directly the case in the rest of Eve.
 
 To make an analogy to null, we fight for sovereignty which gives our pilots the ability to make money from ratting/anoms (missions)
 | 
      
      
        |  Bouh Revetoile
 Barricade.
 
 162
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 01:27:00 -
          [43] - Quote 
 You are already paid for pvp in factional warfare, though you cannot pay more than that, because then you would be able to exploit the mechanic.
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 607
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 01:50:00 -
          [44] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:I'm the one with over 300 kills and losses each month - not you.I don't have a problem engaging versus multiple targets either. But I only occassionally suicide my ships.
 
 XG your claim that you find decent solo pvp fights every 10 minutes just demonstrates how removed from reality your view is.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 643
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 02:47:00 -
          [45] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:I don't have a problem engaging versus multiple targets either. But I only occassionally suicide my ships.
 
 XG your claim that you find decent solo pvp fights every 10 minutes just demonstrates how removed from reality your view is.
  I'm the one with over 300 kills and losses each month - not you. 
 
 Your killboard definitely shows you have allot more time to play computer games than I do. But it doesn't show you can get a decent solo fight every 10 minutes.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Vaal Erit
 Science and Trade Institute
 Caldari State
 
 359
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 04:05:00 -
          [46] - Quote 
 Maybe separate LP usable in the FW LP store from LP usable to upgrade/capture systems?
 
 It looks like farmers are still having a big impact on FW occupancy and that's a shame.
 | 
      
      
        |  Bienator II
 madmen of the skies
 
 1119
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 04:25:00 -
          [47] - Quote 
 wait. the tier influences mission lp payout? I thought (or better i really hoped) that CCP kept it as fixed reward.
 a eve-style bounty system https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=359105
 You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked
 | 
      
      
        |  Damar Rocarion
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 179
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 05:38:00 -
          [48] - Quote 
 
 Dread Operative wrote:Use your alt to plex then you ninny. The reason is to stabilize FW item prices. Or how about you use your main, AND TAKE SOME SYSTEMS!!!!! Gasp!!!!  
 Why the f.ck I should do what you want when the option is to do what I want? And why would I engage in pointless activity where CCP already stacked the deck for your benefit like they have done for years now. Most likely you would whine for another change if for some reason you get permanently kicked from your Tier 4 and CCP would only be too happy to oblige.
 | 
      
      
        |  Dread Operative
 Justified Chaos
 
 20
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 06:11:00 -
          [49] - Quote 
 
 Damar Rocarion wrote:Dread Operative wrote:Use your alt to plex then you ninny. The reason is to stabilize FW item prices. Or how about you use your main, AND TAKE SOME SYSTEMS!!!!! Gasp!!!!  Why the f.ck I should do what you want when the option is to do what I want? And why would I engage in pointless activity where CCP already stacked the deck for your benefit like they have done for years now. Most likely you would whine for another change if for some reason you get permanently kicked from your Tier 4 and CCP would only be too happy to oblige. 
 Well that's a bunch of QQ'ing right there. You're only permently kicked because YOU gave up. You don't see Happy Ending quitting, no, you see them taking systems and chasing out plexers. I've stayed in Gal Mil almost the whole time, even when we were getting stomped by the initial alt army and Ive never quit like you guys have. Guess its just a character thing.
 | 
      
      
        |  Andiedeath
 Sefem Velox
 Swift Angels Alliance
 
 136
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 09:36:00 -
          [50] - Quote 
 Missions fill the gap for those that have time to play 24 hours a day or have very little pvp option around DT. Also some of the best PVP corps in milita run missions. Its the best way to get noobs into BCs for fleet ops. If they remove the bonus from missions you will loose 80% of your pvp and most players from the timezones were there is little pvp available.
 
 Not everyone has the isk to setup t2 production, Null sec ratting bots/miners or PI WH alts...
 
 I believe missions need to add to the contested amount of a system, like a complex... Also why do people complain about missions not producing PVP? The money generated by missions goes straight into buying ships for pvp for 90% of people.
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 608
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 09:37:00 -
          [51] - Quote 
 
 IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote:Minor, medium, and major outposts are perfect examples where people in pvp ships can farm and be available for fights at the same time - especially the minor and medium plexes. So, yes pve'ing in pvp ships is really viable. (And although a little more difficult, all of the plexes can be run in pvp ships if they are run in groups.)chatgris wrote:It pretty much boils down to more people in pvp ships more of the time means more pvp. Of course that is the ideal, I just don't think it is really viable. Hence I'm happy to accept the next best option where at least farming doesn't have a negative impact on PVP. | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 608
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 09:46:00 -
          [52] - Quote 
 
 Schalac wrote:It's beyond Cearain too. Unfortunately for you both, PVP has picked up quite a bit since they implemented the LP for plexes policy. Check the killboards. Do you want to know why? People are farming plexes in pvp ships - they are out in space and available for fights when they occur.Except that the way the plex mechanic worked at the start of Inferno was the same mechanic that was around for years. All they did was added LP for completing them. How people thought that this was going to drive more PvP is beyond me.
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  IbanezLaney
 The Church of Awesome
 Caldari State Capturing
 
 66
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 10:15:00 -
          [53] - Quote 
 The tier bonus should not apply to missions.
 80K lp is too much for how easy missions are.
 
 
 What if an enemy enters your plex and you fight - the plex automatically closes and the lp pays to the pvp winner?
 Multiple enemys would have to be cleared out too before the lp pays giving them a chance to grab the lp back.
 That way people who want to sit and be bored going in circles still can - but the people willing to shoot stuff can 'take the plex' can do so while actively look for enemys plexing and helping sov by pvping.
 
 To avoid alt farming the payout should only apply to ships killed the same size or larger that are fitted.
 Make rigs and 60% of high slots fitted a requirement on the killed ships for the lp to pay to the winner.
 Even if no LP is paid to the killer - the plex should still close after the kill - this would stop unfitted/gunless defensive plexing being used to abuse/exploit the system.
 
 Kinda makes kills effect fw sov + pays the pewing fw people which is what many people seem to want.
 
 
 
 
 
 Fix this **** See Sea Pea.
 | 
      
      
        |  Schalac
 Apocalypse Reign
 
 129
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 10:48:00 -
          [54] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Schalac wrote:Except that the way the plex mechanic worked at the start of Inferno was the same mechanic that was around for years. All they did was added LP for completing them. How people thought that this was going to drive more PvP is beyond me.
  It's beyond Cearain too. Unfortunately for you both, PVP has picked up quite a bit since they implemented the LP for plexes policy. Check the killboards. Do you want to know why? People are farming plexes in pvp ships - more people are out in space and available for fights when they occur. (They are not out of theater or in pve ships trying to make isk) I plex the same way now that I did 3 years ago. Yet I still don't have people come at me unless they have a 3 or 4 to 1 advantage. So no, I don't see a boost to PvP from adding LP to plexes. And honestly I think that once the 4th rolls along I will have even less people come at me because I will have 4-5 armor AC pests sitting right on the warp in because I won't have to fly 70 KM to cap the point. So when that happens once again it will be gank squads of 20-30 frogs jumping my fleet saying GF... which isn't PvP.
 | 
      
      
        |  IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
 Angry Mustellid
 Iron Oxide.
 
 269
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 11:00:00 -
          [55] - Quote 
 I accept there is more PVP occurring now, I do not believe it is because of LP for plexes. There are more plexes now, because they don't just spawn at DT and there are more people in the militias, this is driving more PVP not the LP rewards for plexes.
 
 I think the chance of getting a fight on a per plex per pilot basis is far far lower than it was when we had the post-DT plexing system, I don't have any numbers to back this up but I think the majority would agree with me (well those that play on the same server anyway)
 
 Also I have little interest in ganking people who are trying to make money, as they are a pain in the ass to catch and result in a boring fight.
 | 
      
      
        |  Damar Rocarion
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 179
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 11:20:00 -
          [56] - Quote 
 
 Dread Operative wrote:Well that's a bunch of QQ'ing right there. You're only permently kicked because YOU gave up. 
 Interesting point of view. You do know everything about Eve is mathematics. Now, if one makes calculations and can reasonably assume that they can keep farmers out 8h a day and remaining 16h a day farmers will have free reign, how do you suggest a system will be held?
 
 Answer: It wont be so why bother burning oneself out over it.
 
 But hey, keep insisting system occupancy has anything to do with pvp and not with tz presence & farmer amount.
 
 You have more isk, therefore you have more farmers and occupancy warfare result will thus be pre-determined by CCP's will. After all, what other reason there is that another 100 man alliance joined your side this downtime.
 | 
      
      
        |  Bad Messenger
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 291
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 12:15:00 -
          [57] - Quote 
 
 Vordak Kallager wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:Hey , do not cry about FW missions.
 Those are just what players wanted. On original FW version no one did those missions, but then comes militia CSM candidates who wanted good income for FW players to make isk for pvp, and we sure made isk after several boosts.
 
 Sad thing is that no one has done any pvp after that.
 No one did missions in pre-Inferno? What are you smoking?  
 you are so young player that you do not even know what i am talking about.
 | 
      
      
        |  Crosi Wesdo
 Shadows Of The Federation
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 368
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 12:17:00 -
          [58] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:I don't have a problem engaging versus multiple targets either. But I only occassionally suicide my ships.
 
 XG your claim that you find decent solo pvp fights every 10 minutes just demonstrates how removed from reality your view is.
  I'm the one with over 300 kills and losses each month - not you. Your killboard definitely shows you have allot more time to play computer games than I do. But it doesn't show you can get a decent solo fight every 10 minutes.  
 
 What is this **** about solo pvp? I think you are mistaking faction war for something else. You cannot make other people do what you want them to.
 
 I advise you to leave faction war, make a 1 man corp and go drop cans outside trade hubs if all you want is a steady supply of solo pvp.
 | 
      
      
        |  Bad Messenger
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 291
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 12:28:00 -
          [59] - Quote 
 
 Dread Operative wrote:Damar Rocarion wrote:Dread Operative wrote:Use your alt to plex then you ninny. The reason is to stabilize FW item prices. Or how about you use your main, AND TAKE SOME SYSTEMS!!!!! Gasp!!!!  Why the f.ck I should do what you want when the option is to do what I want? And why would I engage in pointless activity where CCP already stacked the deck for your benefit like they have done for years now. Most likely you would whine for another change if for some reason you get permanently kicked from your Tier 4 and CCP would only be too happy to oblige. Well that's a bunch of QQ'ing right there. You're only permently kicked because YOU gave up. You don't see Happy Ending quitting, no, you see them taking systems and chasing out plexers. I've stayed in Gal Mil almost the whole time, even when we were getting stomped by the initial alt army and Ive never quit like you guys have. Guess its just a character thing. 
 Gallente is only who is taking systems.
 | 
      
      
        |  Bad Messenger
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 291
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 12:37:00 -
          [60] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Schalac wrote:Except that the way the plex mechanic worked at the start of Inferno was the same mechanic that was around for years. All they did was added LP for completing them. How people thought that this was going to drive more PvP is beyond me.
  It's beyond Cearain too. Unfortunately for you both, PVP has picked up quite a bit since they implemented the LP for plexes policy. Check the killboards. Do you want to know why? People are farming plexes in pvp ships - more people are out in space and available for fights when they occur. (They are not out of theater or in pve ships trying to make isk) 
 Thing is that if you bring group of people who can dominate plex warfare those farmers with pvp ships are gone and no one can make them come back to die again and again.
 
 FW still lack possibility to force enemy to fight, as you see LP for plexes is not really working, some caldari players may seek some pvp from gallente farmers but there is no real fight for systems.
 
 This current system has different reasons for different side to plex.
 
 If you want easy isk you join gallente side and farm.
 
 If you want to roleplay caldari you join caldari and try to take systems with small rewards.
 
 Now we can think why would role play reason work when it did not work before.
 | 
      
      
        |  Crosi Wesdo
 Shadows Of The Federation
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 368
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 12:41:00 -
          [61] - Quote 
 
 Bad Messenger wrote:Dread Operative wrote:Damar Rocarion wrote:Dread Operative wrote:Use your alt to plex then you ninny. The reason is to stabilize FW item prices. Or how about you use your main, AND TAKE SOME SYSTEMS!!!!! Gasp!!!!  Why the f.ck I should do what you want when the option is to do what I want? And why would I engage in pointless activity where CCP already stacked the deck for your benefit like they have done for years now. Most likely you would whine for another change if for some reason you get permanently kicked from your Tier 4 and CCP would only be too happy to oblige. Well that's a bunch of QQ'ing right there. You're only permently kicked because YOU gave up. You don't see Happy Ending quitting, no, you see them taking systems and chasing out plexers. I've stayed in Gal Mil almost the whole time, even when we were getting stomped by the initial alt army and Ive never quit like you guys have. Guess its just a character thing. Gallente is only who is taking systems. 
 vaaralen, mushikegi and soon to be korasen and okagaiken would like a word with you.
 
 We have lost system that we didnt defend and/or no one lived there. Caldari have lost systems that no one defended or very few/no one lived there.
 
 It is perfectly reasonable that one guy should not be able to defend a system with a few alts. The new system expresses that reason and is why it was a very large step in the right direction.
 
 While i have no doubt that if these changes came in when expected and caldari were in our position, that you would be here explaining how fair the new system really is. So i have very little sympathy.
 
 The little sympathy i have just makes me think that defensive plexing is a little op and perhaps should drop from 75%lp to 50%, but tbh we are still losing systems. Fact is that to take a system it now needs a concentrated PVP effort, you clearly became too accustomed to systems being farmed by alts and going vulnerable within 3 days with no effort. Thankfully those days are gone.
 | 
      
      
        |  Bad Messenger
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 291
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 12:41:00 -
          [62] - Quote 
 
 Crosi Wesdo wrote:You cannot make other people do what you want them to.
 
 
 
 Sure you can, but that is something you do not seem to know how to do.
 | 
      
      
        |  Crosi Wesdo
 Shadows Of The Federation
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 368
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 12:45:00 -
          [63] - Quote 
 
 Bad Messenger wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:You cannot make other people do what you want them to.
 
 
 Sure you can, but that is something you do not seem to know how to do. 
 Another pearl of wisdom from some guy crying on the forums.
 | 
      
      
        |  Bad Messenger
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 291
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 12:46:00 -
          [64] - Quote 
 
 Crosi Wesdo wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:Dread Operative wrote:Damar Rocarion wrote:Dread Operative wrote:Use your alt to plex then you ninny. The reason is to stabilize FW item prices. Or how about you use your main, AND TAKE SOME SYSTEMS!!!!! Gasp!!!!  Why the f.ck I should do what you want when the option is to do what I want? And why would I engage in pointless activity where CCP already stacked the deck for your benefit like they have done for years now. Most likely you would whine for another change if for some reason you get permanently kicked from your Tier 4 and CCP would only be too happy to oblige. Well that's a bunch of QQ'ing right there. You're only permently kicked because YOU gave up. You don't see Happy Ending quitting, no, you see them taking systems and chasing out plexers. I've stayed in Gal Mil almost the whole time, even when we were getting stomped by the initial alt army and Ive never quit like you guys have. Guess its just a character thing. Gallente is only who is taking systems. vaaralen, mushikegi and soon to be korasen and okagaiken would like a word with you. We have lost system that we didnt defend and/or no one lived there. Caldari have lost systems that no one defended or very few/no one lived there. It is perfectly reasonable that one guy should not be able to defend a system with a few alts. The new system expresses that reason and is why it was a very large step in the right direction. While i have no doubt that if these changes came in when expected and caldari were in our position, that you would be here explaining how fair the new system really is. So i have very little sympathy. The little sympathy i have just makes me think that defensive plexing is a little op and perhaps should drop from 75%lp to 50%, but tbh we are still losing systems. Fact is that to take a system it now needs a concentrated PVP effort, you clearly became too accustomed to systems being farmed by alts and going vulnerable within 3 days with no effort. Thankfully those days are gone. 
 no one is going to play this new FW after they really understand what it this all about. New rats may little help the situation but i doubt it is not enough.
 
 Even if caldari has tier 2 income is less than from highsec lvl4 missions with current rats so no wonder people do not want to plex.
 | 
      
      
        |  Bad Messenger
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 291
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 12:49:00 -
          [65] - Quote 
 
 Crosi Wesdo wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:You cannot make other people do what you want them to.
 
 
 Sure you can, but that is something you do not seem to know how to do. Another pearl of wisdom from some guy crying on the forums. 
 Maybe you will learn on some day that whole EVE is about manipulation others minds to get what you want.
 | 
      
      
        |  Crosi Wesdo
 Shadows Of The Federation
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 368
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 12:53:00 -
          [66] - Quote 
 
 Bad Messenger wrote:
 no one is going to play this new FW after they really understand what it this all about. New rats may little help the situation but i doubt it is not enough.
 
 Even if caldari has tier 2 income is less than from highsec lvl4 missions with current rats so no wonder people do not want to plex.
 
 There there bm, the myan calander doesnt really predict the end of the world, alex jones is an entertainer and david icke, while good natured, is wrong about global leaders being shapeshifting lizards.
 
 Meanwhile people are plexing, pvping and flipping systems. Also making decent isk. Its a little sad the way you project your current discontent onto others as though they are as bitter and washed up as you seem to be.
 
 I think a lot of the ill will from these guys is that they have been spoiled by the terrible initial tier system. That is all.
 | 
      
      
        |  Crosi Wesdo
 Shadows Of The Federation
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 368
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 12:55:00 -
          [67] - Quote 
 
 Bad Messenger wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:You cannot make other people do what you want them to.
 
 
 Sure you can, but that is something you do not seem to know how to do. Another pearl of wisdom from some guy crying on the forums. Maybe you will learn on some day that whole EVE is about manipulation others minds to get what you want. 
 Im not the one who isnt getting what they want, so im not sure what you base your assumptions on. Oh thats right, youre just a terrible bitter troll lashing out because you are angry that things didnt go your way in a computer game. How very.. well adjusted.
 | 
      
      
        |  Seraph Castillon
 Ghost Headquarters
 The Ghost Army
 
 4
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 13:02:00 -
          [68] - Quote 
 There needs to be something to get income from if you're dominating the war. Removing missions would mean a faction would shoot itself in the foot if it ever got all or most system under control. There would be virtually no income to be made, even more so if your enemy was slacking and not trying to contest systems.
 
 
 BUT:
 
 -FW missions should NOT get a bonus from the warzone control.
 -FW missions should be reworked so that they cannot be blitzed. They should be as much of a trigger for PvP as complexes currently are.
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 608
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 15:33:00 -
          [69] - Quote 
 
 Crosi Wesdo wrote:it predicts the end of the Caldari militia! I get it now.There there bm, the myan calander doesnt really predict the end of the world,  
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 608
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 15:44:00 -
          [70] - Quote 
 
 Bad Messenger wrote:This falls under the "You can't force anybody in Eve to fight" category.FW still lack possibility to force enemy to fight, ... 
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Schalac
 Apocalypse Reign
 
 130
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 16:33:00 -
          [71] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:There there bm, the myan calander doesnt really predict the end of the world,   it predicts the end of the Caldari militia! I get it now. And from the ashes the Ghosts of Black Rise shall be born.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 643
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 17:44:00 -
          [72] - Quote 
 
 Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:I don't have a problem engaging versus multiple targets either. But I only occassionally suicide my ships.
 
 XG your claim that you find decent solo pvp fights every 10 minutes just demonstrates how removed from reality your view is.
  I'm the one with over 300 kills and losses each month - not you. Your killboard definitely shows you have allot more time to play computer games than I do. But it doesn't show you can get a decent solo fight every 10 minutes.  What is this **** about solo pvp? I think you are mistaking faction war for something else. You cannot make other people do what you want them to. ... 
 
 
 XG claims he gets decent solo pvp fights about every 10 minutes. In defense of this claim he refers to his number of kills. So I look at his killboard, and see that he clearly is not able to do what he claims.
 
 Why solo pvp? Because statistically that is the best way to get a decent fight the quickest.
 
 As you increase the size of your gang the chances that someone will just randomly be willing an able to fight your gang decreases.
 
 Sure you will get more killmails as you increase the size of your gang. But you wont get nearly as many fights per hour where either side has a decent chance of holding the field.
 
 When did I ever tell anyone to do what I want them to do? If you actually read the thread you will see it XG who is constantly trying to tell me what to do including playing more fw despite it being broken.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Dread Operative
 Justified Chaos
 
 20
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 17:53:00 -
          [73] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:XG claims he gets decent solo pvp fights about every 10 minutes. In defense of this claim he refers to his number of kills. So I look at his killboard, and see that he clearly is not able to do what he claims.
 
 When did I ever tell anyone to do what I want them to do? If you actually read the thread you will see it XG who is constantly trying to tell me what to do including playing more fw despite it being broken.
 
 Again, he said 10 min from undocking. Not every 10min. And trust me, he does pull it off. He'll log in for 30m on his lunch break from work and somehow net 2+ kills. Then silently logs back off.
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 610
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 18:31:00 -
          [74] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:Why solo pvp? Because statistically that is the best way to get a decent fight the quickest.  This is an outright "alternate reality". A better measure is how quickly you can get into any decent fight - whether it is solo, small gang, or fleet. Why would you limit yourself to solo fights unless you were trying to emphasize a fictional problem to meet your warped view of FW?
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 643
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 18:47:00 -
          [75] - Quote 
 
 Dread Operative wrote:Cearain wrote:XG claims he gets decent solo pvp fights about every 10 minutes. In defense of this claim he refers to his number of kills. So I look at his killboard, and see that he clearly is not able to do what he claims.
 
 When did I ever tell anyone to do what I want them to do? If you actually read the thread you will see it XG who is constantly trying to tell me what to do including playing more fw despite it being broken.
 Again, he said 10 min from undocking. Not every 10min. And trust me, he does pull it off. He'll log in for 30m on his lunch break from work and somehow net 2+ kills. Then silently logs back off. 
 
 He was responding to my question asking him how many fights he gets per set time period. I have gotten a fight within 10 minutes of undocking as well - sheer luck - it happens. But that means nothing. The question is how frequent is the pvp on average not whether one time he got lucky and had a bunch of kills in an hour. We have all done that.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 643
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 18:50:00 -
          [76] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Why solo pvp? Because statistically that is the best way to get a decent fight the quickest.  This is an outright "alternate reality". A better measure is how quickly you can get into any  decent fight - whether it is solo, small gang, or fleet. Why would you limit yourself to solo fights unless you were trying to emphasize a fictional problem to meet your warped view of FW? 
 
 You cut off the part of my post that answers your question. Why don't you read what I wrote?
 
 As you increase your gang above the size of say a BC you are going to find decent pvp fights (where either side has a substantial chance of holding the field) less frequently. Its a matter of mathematics.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 612
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 19:02:00 -
          [77] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:You cut off the part of my post that answers your question. Why don't you read what I wrote?As you increase your gang above the size of say a BC you are going to find decent pvp fights (where either side has a substantial chance of holding the field) less frequently. Its a matter of mathematics.
 Yes, it is a matter of mathematics. By excluding all but one category of pvp you can attempt to make a point that pvp is nearly impossible to get if you are a FW pilot. The fact is that being in good intel channels with active players and a willingness to engage are all that are needed to get fights quickly.
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 643
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 19:05:00 -
          [78] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:You cut off the part of my post that answers your question. Why don't you read what I wrote?As you increase your gang above the size of say a BC you are going to find decent pvp fights (where either side has a substantial chance of holding the field) less frequently. Its a matter of mathematics.
 Yes, it is a matter of mathematics. By excluding all but one category of pvp you can attempt to make a point that pvp is nearly impossible to get if you are a FW pilot. The fact is that being in good intel channels with active players and a willingness to engage are all that are needed to get fights quickly.  
 So how many decent fights per 2 hours of play?
 
 I do not exclude any types of pvp. I just recognize that as the size of my gang goes up there is a higher chance that I will be doing allot more roaming and shipping up and down than fighting fights that can go either way. There is a reason for that.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Damar Rocarion
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 181
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 19:55:00 -
          [79] - Quote 
 X gals method of pvp is "fly a kiting ship, gank noobies. If you meet someone who wont die to usual link boosted kiting comet, run away from local and come back with 10 guys and demand a fight."
 
 After that he runs to forums to boast how awesome he is.
 | 
      
      
        |  Poison Ivvy
 Astra Enterprises
 Happy Endings
 
 36
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 20:17:00 -
          [80] - Quote 
 You guys all funny boasting all this drama around :) Anyways Caldari Militia wont-¦t ever die as long as we-¦re around so keep on bringing good fights Galls :)
 | 
      
      
        |  Dread Operative
 Justified Chaos
 
 20
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 20:24:00 -
          [81] - Quote 
 
 Damar Rocarion wrote:X gals method of pvp is "fly a kiting ship, gank noobies. If you meet someone who wont die to usual link boosted kiting comet, run away from local and come back with 10 guys and demand a fight."
 After that he runs to forums to boast how awesome he is.
 
 XG has boosts? That's news too me, considering in ever single OGB thread he is firmly against OGB's... and Im in his corp and was the only one with OGB.
 
 Oh Whinemar, the things you say entertain me so.
 | 
      
      
        |  Dread Operative
 Justified Chaos
 
 20
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 20:26:00 -
          [82] - Quote 
 
 Poison Ivvy wrote:You guys all funny boasting all this drama around :) Anyways Caldari Militia wont-¦t ever die as long as we-¦re around so keep on bringing good fights Galls :)  
 Thank you for being the only alliance bringing fights, taking systems, and not whining about it!
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 612
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 20:34:00 -
          [83] - Quote 
 
 Damar Rocarion wrote:X gals method of pvp is "fly a kiting ship, gank noobies. If you meet someone who wont die to usual link boosted kiting comet, run away from local and come back with 10 guys and demand a fight." 1. I fail at pvp, but I do understand how to get into fights, and 2. Intaki is great this time of year.
 | 
      
      
        |  Sean Parisi
 Project Cerberus
 Caldari State Capturing
 
 39
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.12 23:43:00 -
          [84] - Quote 
 Don't mission myself. But I think they are fine, if a faction takes over an entire Warzone and decimate their enemy it ensures they can consistently still make LP.
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 620
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.13 21:39:00 -
          [85] - Quote 
 http://gallente.eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15192946
 
 Less than two minutes from undocking. Logged into Deven, had to make one jump into Fliet and then warp to minor plex. But it wasn't a good fight. I had my "loki-boosted, snake-set" Comet, warped into him at zero (I know, certain death right? But you know what they say - fortune favors the bold and all that) and had to burn away before getting scrammed.
 
 Carry on.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 645
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.13 22:37:00 -
          [86] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:http://gallente.eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15192946
 Less than two minutes from undocking. Logged into Deven, had to make one jump into Fliet and then warp to minor plex. But it wasn't a good fight. I had my "loki-boosted, snake-set" Comet, warped into him at zero (I know, certain death right? But you know what they say - fortune favors the bold and all that) and had to burn away before getting scrammed.
 
 Carry on.
 
 
 Thanks for sharing, but why should we care?
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Bad Messenger
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 293
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.13 22:49:00 -
          [87] - Quote 
 
 Sean Parisi wrote:Don't mission myself. But I think they are fine, if a faction takes over an entire Warzone and decimate their enemy it ensures they can consistently still make LP. 
 actually not really, with tier 1 you will get only 0.5x of rewards while enemy gets 3.25x rewards. So if agent tell you that you will get 25000lp actually with tier 1 you will get 12500 and with tier5 you will get 81250 lp. Also you have to note that if you lose all systems you will lose all lowsec agents so you get actually much less lp than just 50%.
 
 So there is just no point to try to grind any isk on losing side, better to join winners and make easy isk.
 
 And if you want to pvp i am sure there is pvp on every side, at least for now.
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 620
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.13 23:21:00 -
          [88] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:Thanks for sharing, but why should we care? Direct rebuttal to your argument perhaps? Carry on.
 | 
      
      
        |  Dread Operative
 Quantum Cats Syndicate
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 25
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.14 05:02:00 -
          [89] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Thanks for sharing, but why should we care? Direct rebuttal to your argument perhaps? Carry on. 
 XG arguing with Squids is like arguing with liberals. Logic does not cut it. You have to bribe them with handouts.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 646
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.14 20:25:00 -
          [90] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Thanks for sharing, but why should we care? Direct rebuttal to your argument perhaps? Carry on. 
 
 Where did I ever argue it was impossible to get a fight in 2 minutes?
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 622
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.14 20:49:00 -
          [91] - Quote 
 Another < 10 minute kill Yesterday as well. Log on, comms says "Celestis and griffins in Heyd", UNDOCK (the first key to getting fights quickly btw), warp to plex and engage Celestis, thought griffins were going to come but they didn't. Keres shows up late to *****. Technically not a 1v1, but a good fight filled with potential risk. Mutnin would be proud, but he doesn't play anymore either.
 
 It is just so incredibly difficult to get fights in FW. I mean, I've been wasting like two minutes of my life setting up these fights! Why can't we get fights before we undock from station??!!! rageragerage!!!!!
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 646
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.14 22:49:00 -
          [92] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Another < 10 minute kill Yesterday as well. Log on, comms says "Celestis and griffins in Heyd", UNDOCK (the first key to getting fights quickly btw), warp to plex and engage Celestis, thought griffins were going to come but they didn't. Keres shows up late to *****. Technically not a 1v1, but a good fight filled with potential risk. Mutnin would be proud, but he doesn't play anymore either. It is just so incredibly difficult to get fights in FW. I mean, I've been wasting like two minutes of my life setting up these fights! Why can't we get fights before we undock from station??!!! rageragerage!!!!! 
 
 XG again the question isn't whether you can occassionally get lucky and find a fight fast. The question is on average how many fights do you get per hour or 2.
 
 I can tell you I roamed around some busy wt systems and only get about 1 fight per 1.5 hours. Some people think getting 1 good fight per 1.5 hours is good. I don't. I was hoping they would get faction war to the point where we would reliably get 3-7 decent fights every 2 hours.
 
 I first figured out how few fights I was getting per hour when I started taking boosters. I generally would take a booster before I would leave station (so that if I got bad side effects I could fly a different type of ship or whatever) and then start roaming. Well I found that often the booster effect would wear off with no fights. I now don't take boosters in the station anymore, because it is likely that you will just waste them.
 
 Maybe you guys are getting allot more fights up in gallente caldari space. But last time I was told that I went up there and found it was much worse than the amarr minmatar front. I tend to think you just remember the times you get in a fight in 10 minutes of undocking but lose track of the time you spend wandering around.
 
 
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 622
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.14 23:19:00 -
          [93] - Quote 
 Today: Logged into Deven, immediately undocked, warped to Fliet gate and there were three Russian drakes hanging out. Of course they must have been baiting somebody in Fliet. I just in, larger plex is up so I warp to it. There's another Russian drake tackled by two of our militia guys, so I join in and point and orbit at 20 km. Who knows, maybe we have support coming. I let the guys know on the intel channels that there are Russians in Deven. When the bait drake gets down to 20% shield, the Russian support comes in and one of our guys dies. Technically, not a 1v1, but a fight in under 2 minutes from logging on (AGAIN).
 
 So, I decide to head to Oto. It was at 32% yesterday (Thank you CCP for providing these numbers), and today it is at 28% - hey maybe somebody is plexing it down. On the way, in Deven there's a FW mission up so I take mental note. Open minor plex in Oto - Navy SWO (who has been there the last few days) doesn't show up in the first minute so I head back to Deven. Maybe I can gank a FW mission runner? I warp to the mission and there's a Russian dramiel there waiting to gank me. So I warp into the mission adn then warp to Fliet. He follows. Sorry, but Dramiel > Comet and this is a fight I would lose (and have lost) 100% of the time. I jump Fliet, warp to minor and he follows so I warp out again into Heyd and ship into a Catalyst. PRO TIP: Have multiple types of ships ready to go in station.
 
 Who knows? He's probably gone and I'll just run the minor in Fliet. I warp to Fliet gate in Heyd and he's there in his dram just jumping in. I jump through and warp to the minor. Surely this dude will follow and I'll probably lose this Cat. I've got maybe a 10% success rate against drams (according to recent history fighting drams in Annancale), but I think "Hey why not?" I summon all the karma I can from the great Zarnak Wolf, godfather of the125mm rail Catalyst, and think WWZD? He wouldn't go into the plex. He'd land and burn off as quickly as possible. So that's what I did. Dram lands and gives chase. 10 overheated seconds later.... 10 minutes into Eve
 
 Unfortunately I had to go GCC, so I warped into the minor and hung out for 10 minutes to get 25k LP as well. Not a bad session. Elongated not by FW but by low sec GCC mechanics.
 
 Two fights in the first 12 minutes. Could have two fights in under 10 minutes but I was too much of a ***** to engage a Dramiel with my Comet.
 
 What do these three fights listed in this thread have in common?
 1. FW plexes and missions ALL played a key role in enabling the fights.
 2. All three fights involved ships I use to solo run FW plexes.
 3. I was willing to engage at less than 100% odds of winning (probably 70%, then 50%, then 20% odds by my estimation)
 4. Intel channels are great for finding engagements.
 
 Bottom Line: YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 646
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 01:37:00 -
          [94] - Quote 
 XG
 
 Nothing you describe is new to me.
 
 I see you also got another fight 2 hours after that. And another fight 2 hours after that one. One decent fight every 2 hours isn't bad. Keep at it and you might be able to get as good as I am and have fights every 1.5 hours.
 
 
 
 I do appreciate your comment on how important it is to be able to reship quickly. You probably don't realize how station lockouts often prevent that.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 622
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 02:49:00 -
          [95] - Quote 
 This afternoon: 32 seconds! Logged in, this time in space. Saw plex on scan with wolf and thrasher, warped to plex at 20, engaged thrasher, got kill.
 
 So, bottom line, there's plenty of on demand pvp in FW. Don't let any of the posters in here tell you otherwise.
 
 Check out the plexes. If you are in FW, then run them if things are slow. You'll get lots of LP (Caldari are at Tier 2 = 1 hookbill per minor plex), to recover from any of your losses. Kill stuff as you see fit. Join intel channels, x up for fleets, yada yada yada.
 
 FW is where it's at fellas - if you want near on-demand pvp.
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  chatgris
 Quantum Cats Syndicate
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 238
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 04:25:00 -
          [96] - Quote 
 I took the X G challenge and took a break from WoT - in under 2 hours I got 10 kills, 8 of those were solo (one has a few people on the kill that ninja'd well before I was on grid), the other two had a friend in a thrasher with me.
 
 All fights except one were in FW plexes. I only had to roam in a 2 jump radius of my home system.
 
 Seems like FW is alive and kicking to me.
 | 
      
      
        |  Super Chair
 Project Cerberus
 Caldari State Capturing
 
 345
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 05:52:00 -
          [97] - Quote 
 
 chatgris wrote:I took the X G challenge and took a break from WoT - in under 2 hours I got 10 kills, 8 of those were solo (one has a few people on the kill that ninja'd well before I was on grid), the other two had a friend in a thrasher with me. All just me in the ol trusty thrasher, no boosts.
 All fights except one were in FW plexes. I only had to roam in a 2 jump radius of my home system.
 
 Seems like FW is alive and kicking to me.
 
 League of Legends misses you (not teemo though, f@ck teemo)
 | 
      
      
        |  Barrogh Habalu
 Imperial Shipment
 Amarr Empire
 
 50
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 09:39:00 -
          [98] - Quote 
 I'm afraid that there's no such thing as final fix for FW. FW was intended as some space for "self-paying" PvP activity, kinda middle ground between roaming low just for lulz and going to sov null for srs business of whatever sort.
 
 But that means FW is an income source, and as such it appeals to those seeking ISK. Let's also take into consideration amount of ISK "provided". Too few, and it won't cover ships people wanna fly even in slightest, and even farmers won't come, while for PvP fans it will be just another excuse to pointlessly roam lowsec (protip - PvP fans don't need that excuse, leading to even less damn given to FW by those as well as by "farmers", lack of targets will be understandable). Give more - and certain people will grind it all, still avoiding combat and loses all that income was supposed to cover. Not exactly PvP environement you're trying to achieve.
 
 So if you bind this (decent, let's say) amount of ISK to local PvE activity more, you will see people who are in just for grind. Move focus on PvP - and you'll see something you won't see in any other game but EVE: people farming their alts or even pulling off stuff like "FW forex" (this is due due to the fact that EVE designed in a way to encourage alts, no other game provide such benefits for having some).
 
 Noone can fix that without completely remaking the game tbh.
 
 The only way to deal with that is, like always, doing your stuff and don't mind others, like some posters above seem to do (and if that works for them, why not for you?). This, obviously, won't do anything about people who are in just to grind in the corner (or about whatever group you don't like), but as I've said, I don't believe that it's possible to artifically turn FW into proper battleground with PCs fighting PCs being mercs for NPCs (if that's the intention).
 
 And speaking about missions, well... I don't see them as an integral part of FW which is PvP environement so far. Not when doing them requires you to fly the ship that will fold in PvP like a cardboard.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 646
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 13:43:00 -
          [99] - Quote 
 
 chatgris wrote:I took the X G challenge and took a break from WoT - in under 2 hours I got 10 kills, 8 of those were solo (one has a few people on the kill that ninja'd well before I was on grid), the other two had a friend in a thrasher with me. All just me in the ol trusty thrasher, no boosts.
 All fights except one were in FW plexes. I only had to roam in a 2 jump radius of my home system.
 
 Seems like FW is alive and kicking to me.
 
 
 Thats really excellent. I think I did something close to that once or twice but its excedingly rare. That is definitely not happening in the amarr minmatar front. How many different fights was it?
 
 BTW its not really XG challenge. He doesn't try to see how many fights he can get in 2 hours. He just gets a single kill and comes running to the forums to post it and says "see there is lots of pvp"
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  jjohnpaul xvii
 CTRL-Q
 Iron Oxide.
 
 41
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 14:50:00 -
          [100] - Quote 
 I don't think its that much of an exaggeration Cearain. I get about the same amount of fights as XG, id say i would average 2/3 per hour as a minimum or i'll log off/go do something else for a bit.
 
 - I have limited playtime, I do use boosts, and i am aggressive in the fights i go in for.
 
 - i have access to 6-8 active intel channels i use with at least 4 of these bringing good quality intel, failing that i fly the loop Arzad > Sahtogas > Kam > Dal > Amamake > Arzad which rarely lets me down.
 
 - Minnies have an excellent relationship between corps/alliances. Mostly, we share one TS server and the interaction between corps on that is brilliant. Ill often get someone jump into our channel to report activity or call for help etc or vice versa. If nothings going on in one channel ill jump in with some of the other corps or even just general militia.
 
 
 I dont know the Amarr set up at all > but i get the impression (feel free to correct me) that the Amarr corps dont really work together as well as the Minnies. Maybe someone like Zarnak or Saly could comment having seen both sides of the coin.
 
 I'm not saying that everything XG is saying is true, but you may be losing out on some fights as he says due to lack of intel/faction cohesion and in my experience, i agree with Chatgris and XG, i really dont think its that bad at the minute. (IMHO).
 
 
 
 As a complete sidenote > Kam/kourm/Auga was BUZZING last night. I get the feeling activity is ramping up again pre-patch.....
 | 
      
      
        |  Veshta Yoshida
 PIE Inc.
 Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
 
 381
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 15:23:00 -
          [101] - Quote 
 
 jjohnpaul xvii wrote:...As a complete sidenote > Kam/kourm/Auga was BUZZING last night. I get the feeling activity is ramping up again pre-patch..... Just you wait until the leash (NPC/Geography imbalances) comes off .. that buzzing will spread to all of Metro and grow to a searing pain.
  
 By far the best thing considered for implementation since the start of FW is the extra connections, they will in effect bring everything into play instead of just Heimatar. Going to be glorious.
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 646
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 15:31:00 -
          [102] - Quote 
 
 jjohnpaul xvii wrote:I don't think its that much of an exaggeration Cearain. I get about the same amount of fights as XG, id say i would average 2/3 per hour as a minimum or i'll log off/go do something else for a bit. 
 - I have limited playtime, I do use boosts, and i am aggressive in the fights i go in for. Ill fight solo/pair, small gang or even bloob depending on what targets are available.
 
 - i have access to 6-8 active intel channels i use with at least 4 of these bringing good quality intel, failing that i fly the loop Arzad > Sahtogas > Kam > Dal > Amamake > Arzad which rarely lets me down.
 
 - Minnies have an excellent relationship between corps/alliances. Mostly, we share one TS server and the interaction between corps on that is brilliant. Ill often get someone jump into our channel to report activity or call for help etc or vice versa. If nothings going on in one channel ill jump in with some of the other corps or even just general militia.
 
 
 I dont know the Amarr set up at all > but i get the impression (feel free to correct me) that the Amarr corps dont really work together as well as the Minnies (including comms and intel sharing). Maybe someone like Zarnak or Saly could comment having seen both sides of the coin.
 
 I'm not saying that everything XG is saying is true, but you may be losing out on some fights as he says due to lack of intel/faction cohesion.
 
 In my experience, i agree with Chatgris and XG, i really dont think its that bad at the minute. (IMHO).
 
 
 
 As a complete sidenote > Kam/kourm/Auga was BUZZING last night. I get the feeling activity is ramping up again pre-patch.....
 
 
 Its not that I doubt XG did what he said, its just that its meaningless. Its not objective or statistically significant. We all can have a lucky streak. The question is if I spend decide to spend say 20 hours a month logged in looking for pvp how many decent fights am I going to average. I am getting about one every hour and a half.
 
 The amarr intel channels that I am part of, are not really buzzing with intel that is true. It would be easy to blame others but I rarely post my intel there either. So yeah its true amarr could likely do much better.
 
 However what chatgris described seemed to have very little to do with intel channels. He just jumped in his ship and went around 3 systems. Maybe I am wrong though.
 
 My main intel is knowing what systems are contested and what systems I know minmatar base out of. I mainly hit dal, vard, Ezzara, arzad, auga, kourm, lamma. Sometimes I head out around sahtogas but it really hasn't been fruitful.
 
 I don't usually hit huola because I simply cant compete with the boosted frigates orbitting my cruiser/destroyer/frigate at 30k. I don't mind that minmatar use boosters its just that I admit I can't compete with them, so I tend to stay out of the systems where i know they are used allot. Same thing happened with arzad for a while. It seemed everytime I wanted to run a plex a hookbill that could point me at 30k and sensor damp me so I couldn't target anything over 20k would swoop in and I would just have to warp out.
 
 I think allot of people lose track of time playing eve. They just don't realize how much time goes by waiting for fleets to form etc. I know I used to be that way. I think if people really started timing themselves from the time they log on they would find that they really only get 1 decent fight per 1.5 hours.
 
 What chatgris did wasn't statistically significant but at least it was objective. You can look at his killboard and see he got fights in a set amount of time. I think that was a way above average number of fights per 2 hour session. If you look at XG's posts he comes here posting about how he got a kill in 2 seconds but then you see it takes another 2 hours for the next kill(or loss). Then another 2 hours for the next. XGs posts are neither statistically significant or objective.
 
 If people could get decent fights then the killboards should show that again and again. Playing eve for 2 hours straigt is not that unusual.
 
 But fair enough, I will try some more roams. Perhaps the last three roams I did were unusually dry. I admit they were not statistically significant either.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Dread Operative
 Quantum Cats Syndicate
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 29
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 15:52:00 -
          [103] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:...comes here posting about how he got a kill in 2 seconds but then you see it takes another 2 hours for the next kill(or loss). Then another 2 hours for the next. XGs posts are neither statistically significant or objective.
 If people could get decent fights then the killboards should show that again and again. Playing eve for 2 hours straigt is not that unusual.
 
 But fair enough, I will try some more roams. Perhaps the last three roams I did were unusually dry. I admit they were not statistically significant either.
 
 Just so you know, XG doesn't stay on for extended periods of time. Normally he'll log on in space somewhere fly round for 30 min then log off. Then get back on an hour or two later. Your KB stalking shows the result.
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 625
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 16:03:00 -
          [104] - Quote 
 
 Dread Operative wrote:Just so you know, XG doesn't stay on for extended periods of time. Normally he'll log on in space somewhere fly round for 30 min then log off. Then get back on an hour or two later. Your KB stalking shows the result. Nothing you say will convince him that's he's wrong. He can't get fights and so he assumes that nobody can get them. I stated I can get kills within 10 minutes of logging on and he said "No way". Several case studies over the last two days shows otherwise, but they are then dismissed as a "fluke". Whatever. Carry on. chatgris showed him that he can get lots of fights over a two hour period yesterday, but "that is not statsitically significant".
 
 So, what'cha gonna do? Whatever.
 | 
      
      
        |  Damar Rocarion
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 184
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 18:14:00 -
          [105] - Quote 
 
 jjohnpaul xvii wrote:I don't think its that much of an exaggeration Cearain. I get about the same amount of fights as XG, id say i would average 2/3 decent/enjoyable fights per hour as a minimum or i'll log off/go do something else for a bit. 
 
 Except you are a stupid moron who does not understand the reality of FW which is that side with more isk (= CCP's designated favourites of gal/matar) attracts more farmers and pvp militias (= CCP's loathed Amarr/Caldari as proven by CCP Soundwaves bullcrap back in AT VII) have to spend the energy to defense and undo farmer work which happens during their off-hours.
 
 Eventually pvp'ers decide to f.ck it and move to places where they dont have to orbit button for several hours a day. CCP's pet goat miltiias then go to forums to high-five each other and say they are in FW for pvp and not for massive isk farming, which is still possible via missions or contesting systems with spy alts.
 | 
      
      
        |  | 
      
      
        |  CCP Eterne
 C C P
 C C P Alliance
 
 479
 
 
  
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 18:31:00 -
          [106] - Quote 
 Deleted a post with multiple violations and one that was a reply to it.
 Community Representative GÇ+ EVE Illuminati GÇ+ Fiction Adept
 
 @CCP_Eterne GÇ+ @EVE_LiveEvents
 | 
      
      
        |  | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 646
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 19:15:00 -
          [107] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:Dread Operative wrote:Just so you know, XG doesn't stay on for extended periods of time. Normally he'll log on in space somewhere fly round for 30 min then log off. Then get back on an hour or two later. Your KB stalking shows the result. Nothing you say will convince him that's he's wrong. He can't get fights and so he assumes that nobody can get them. I stated I can get fights (not kills) within 10 minutes of logging on and he said "No way". Several case studies over the last two days shows otherwise, but they are then dismissed as a "fluke". Whatever. Carry on. chatgris showed him that he can get lots of fights over a two hour period yesterday, but "that is not statsitically significant".  So, what'cha gonna do? Whatever. The real audience in these posts is everybody else. You'll never convince Cearain he's wrong, but we do have a chance at convincing the readers that he is wrong. FW (and low sec) is great for casual pvp. If you want to null bear it up and pay your 0.0 overlords rent, go ahead. If you want pvp, come to FW low sec. 
 XG no one cares that you logged in a few times and got a kill or 2 quickly. The question is on average what can you expect.
 
 I just logged in and got 2 decent fights within 45 minutes of signing in. But those were the only 2 fights I got from 2hours and 25 minutes of roaming and plexing primarilly dal auga huola kourmonen lamaa ezzarra ammamake vard ezzarra arzad and few other quick looks into a few other systems. That was a long 1hour and 35 minutes or roaming around with no fight.
 
 You keep posting about how you got a kill really quick but you keep refusing to answer how many decent fights you get on average per hour or 2 of play.
 
 That is why your posts are worthless to anyone who looks at this rationally.
 
 You can say its because I don't know what I am doing but i have been doing this for years. I was able to get 3-7 fights per 2 hours at the peak of inferno.
 
 Its possible that allot of the people fighting for minmatar are less willing to fight in plexes. I was in a merlin and during my roam I had lone 2 destroyers and a lone comet run when I entered their plexes. If they would have stayed and fought that would have been 5 fights in 2 hours. So its possible its different for the each faction.
 
 
 Maybe its harder to get pvp when your on the losing side because you waste a higher percentage of your time chasing farmers. Where as when you are on the winning side the enemy is primarilly there for the fights so you don't waste as much time.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Joanna Ramirez
 Intaki Militia
 
 89
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 20:32:00 -
          [108] - Quote 
 
 CCP Eterne wrote:Deleted a post with multiple violations and one that was a reply to it. 
 There is an actual recording where CCP soundwave mocks Caldari militia during alliance tournament and it's considered "rumor mongering".
 
 Awesome sauce. Perhaps next you can prove to us that black is white and vice versa?
 
 | 
      
      
        |  chatgris
 Quantum Cats Syndicate
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 238
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 21:22:00 -
          [109] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:chatgris wrote:I took the X G challenge and took a break from WoT - in under 2 hours I got 10 kills, 8 of those were solo (one has a few people on the kill that ninja'd well before I was on grid), the other two had a friend in a thrasher with me. All just me in the ol trusty thrasher, no boosts.
 All fights except one were in FW plexes. I only had to roam in a 2 jump radius of my home system.
 
 Seems like FW is alive and kicking to me.
 Thats really excellent. I think I did something close to that once or twice but its excedingly rare. That is definitely not happening in the amarr minmatar front. How many different fights was it? BTW its not really XG challenge. He doesn't try to see how many fights he can get in 2 hours. He just gets a single kill and comes running to the forums to post it and says "see there is lots of pvp" 
 It was 6 different fights in two hours.
 
 And to respond to your later comments - I didn't actually use any intel channels to find those fights (I was in comms listening for intel, but I found plenty of my own fights so I didn't move to assist with the intel that was being reported).
 
 One of the fights (two kills) I saw an rvb gang on a gate and I convo'd them to meet me in a plex and they obliged. The rest were just people I stumbled across in my roaming (which was just a loop of a few systems. If I don't have to travel for my pvp, well, I don't :D ).
 
 I admit this was a fairly active stretch of time, but it wasn't extraordinarily active.
 
 Another tactic I use sometimes if it's slow (I didn't use it during this test) is to leave a 0 skill alt afk defensive plexing in a system on one screen while I play WoT on another screen. If a pirate comes in, let the pirate go gcc (keeping them in system for 15 minutes) which gives me time to finish my WoT game, hop into a ship the pirate will fight and go get a fight them return to WoT. Wt's will often stick around in local if you tell them your main is finishing a game of WoT and will log on shortly if they will just wait in the size of plex they wish to fight in.
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 625
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.15 22:20:00 -
          [110] - Quote 
 
 Joanna Ramirez wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:Deleted a post with multiple violations and one that was a reply to it. There is an actual recording where CCP soundwave mocks Caldari militia during alliance tournament and it's considered "rumor mongering".  Awesome sauce. Perhaps next you can prove to us that black is white and vice versa? This would be a great listen. Link?
 | 
      
      
        |  Joanna Ramirez
 Intaki Militia
 
 89
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.16 06:57:00 -
          [111] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:This would be a great listen. Link? 
 As soon as someone uploads all AT videos with commentaries (militia matches will suffice), i'm happy to point you to it.
 
 | 
      
      
        |  jjohnpaul xvii
 CTRL-Q
 Iron Oxide.
 
 41
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.16 10:14:00 -
          [112] - Quote 
 Ahhhh man, i wanna see the ''multiple forum violations''.....
 
 It sounds like someone got two personal attacks within 20 minutes of logging onto the forums, and that is definitely statistically significant.
  
 
 Cearain > Give me a shout if your in the Huola/Kourm area, i'm not a big fan of arranged PvP but a couple of 1v1's would be good fun (no boosts i promise!) o7
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 646
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.16 14:48:00 -
          [113] - Quote 
 
 jjohnpaul xvii wrote:Ahhhh man, i wanna see the ''multiple forum violations''..... It sounds like someone got two personal attacks within 20 minutes of logging onto the forums, and that is definitely statistically significant.   
 
 I missed the good stuff too.
 
 jjohnpaul xvii wrote:Cearain > Give me a shout if your in the Huola/Kourm area, i'm not a big fan of arranged PvP but a couple of 1v1's would be good fun (no boosts i promise!) o7
 
 
 I appreciate the offer. I will keep that in mind. But I am not a fan of arranged pvp either. I did allot of arranged 1v1s when I was with rvb, and I am still burned out on it.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 626
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.16 14:53:00 -
          [114] - Quote 
 My sincere aplogies to Cearain. I doubted that you actually logged into the game, but your killboard says otherwise.
 Kills in October and November
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 646
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.16 15:04:00 -
          [115] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:My sincere aplogies to Cearain. I doubted that you actually logged into the game, but your killboard says otherwise.Kills in October and November 
 
 The fact that I was posting about how many fights I was getting per hour should have been a clue. That is if we assume you actually read the posts to which you respond.
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 626
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.16 15:37:00 -
          [116] - Quote 
 No wonder you're complaining so much. Come to Fliet for the next couple of days. The pirates here are very active and you can get fights within 10 minutes of logging on. Almost guaranteed. And there are plenty of FDU guys who will try to kill you as well.
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Cearain
 Imperial Outlaws
 
 646
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.16 16:08:00 -
          [117] - Quote 
 
 X Gallentius wrote:No wonder you're complaining so much. Come to Fliet for the next couple of days. The pirates here are very active and you can get fights within 10 minutes of logging on. Almost guaranteed. And there are plenty of FDU guys who will try to kill you as well. 
 
 
 
 I will do that. I am not that familiar with the area. So I will need to find a system close to the action I can put some ships in. Preferably one that is fw neutral so I can access them later if I want. High sec is fine I'm only -3.
 
 Odd thing is I saw some caldari who said your front was boring and so came looking for some fights against minmatar.
 
 Based on what you and chatgris are saying that seems odd unless there is something to the theory I proposed. Specifically, that when you fight for the lower tier side you waste more time chasing farmers whereas when you are on the winning side you can be pretty sure enemies in the plexes are there for pvp. So you get more frequent pvp when you fight for the winning side.
 
 
 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
 
 | 
      
      
        |  X Gallentius
 Justified Chaos
 
 626
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.16 16:51:00 -
          [118] - Quote 
 Fliet for the next two days, then OMS, or hang out with Damar in Ladistier, or Aeschee (closest neutral low sec system). All areas are fairly active with both pirates and wts.
 | 
      
      
        |  chatgris
 Quantum Cats Syndicate
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 240
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.16 17:15:00 -
          [119] - Quote 
 
 Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:No wonder you're complaining so much. Come to Fliet for the next couple of days. The pirates here are very active and you can get fights within 10 minutes of logging on. Almost guaranteed. And there are plenty of FDU guys who will try to kill you as well. 
 
 I will do that. I am not that familiar with the area. So I will need to find a system close to the action I can put some ships in. Preferably one that is fw neutral so I can access them later if I want. High sec is fine I'm only -3.  
 Actee is high sec and it is adjacent for Fliet (a system which is the focus of a lot of plexing right now) and Heyd (one of the main gallente home systems: Also Nisuwa and Nennamaila are home systems for gallente).
 
 I get most of my pew pew up around the Kedama area. If you are interested in that area, Rakapas is a very good system to base out of (the most powerful caldari alliance bases out of there). It has easy access to Nennamaila, Nisuwa AND Heyd.
 
 I highly recommend Rakapas for your base of operations - it is a little bit out from Fliet (but only 5 jumps) but a lot of caldari base there, and it's central to the main gallente hubs.
 | 
      
      
        |  Bad Messenger
 Nasranite Watch
 Liandri Covenant
 
 295
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.16 18:17:00 -
          [120] - Quote 
 
 chatgris wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:No wonder you're complaining so much. Come to Fliet for the next couple of days. The pirates here are very active and you can get fights within 10 minutes of logging on. Almost guaranteed. And there are plenty of FDU guys who will try to kill you as well. 
 
 I will do that. I am not that familiar with the area. So I will need to find a system close to the action I can put some ships in. Preferably one that is fw neutral so I can access them later if I want. High sec is fine I'm only -3.  Actee is high sec and it is adjacent for Fliet (a system which is the focus of a lot of plexing right now) and Heyd (one of the main gallente home systems: Also Nisuwa and Nennamaila are home systems for gallente). I get most of my pew pew up around the Kedama area. If you are interested in that area, Rakapas is a very good system to base out of (the most powerful caldari alliance bases out of there). It has easy access to Nennamaila, Nisuwa AND Heyd. I highly recommend Rakapas for your base of operations - it is a little bit out from Fliet (but only 5 jumps) but a lot of caldari base there, and it's central to the main gallente hubs. 
 i recommend Villore.
 | 
      
      
        |  chatgris
 Quantum Cats Syndicate
 Drunk 'n' Disorderly
 
 241
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.11.16 18:26:00 -
          [121] - Quote 
 
 Bad Messenger wrote:chatgris wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:No wonder you're complaining so much. Come to Fliet for the next couple of days. The pirates here are very active and you can get fights within 10 minutes of logging on. Almost guaranteed. And there are plenty of FDU guys who will try to kill you as well. 
 
 I will do that. I am not that familiar with the area. So I will need to find a system close to the action I can put some ships in. Preferably one that is fw neutral so I can access them later if I want. High sec is fine I'm only -3.  Actee is high sec and it is adjacent for Fliet (a system which is the focus of a lot of plexing right now) and Heyd (one of the main gallente home systems: Also Nisuwa and Nennamaila are home systems for gallente). I get most of my pew pew up around the Kedama area. If you are interested in that area, Rakapas is a very good system to base out of (the most powerful caldari alliance bases out of there). It has easy access to Nennamaila, Nisuwa AND Heyd. I highly recommend Rakapas for your base of operations - it is a little bit out from Fliet (but only 5 jumps) but a lot of caldari base there, and it's central to the main gallente hubs. i recommend Villore. 
 Do gallente still base there? If so, how many say during prime time EU/US are in system usually?
 
 Honest question, haven't been to villore much since, well, 2009.
 
 | 
      
        |  |  | 
      
      
        | Pages: 1 2 3 4 5  :: [one page] |