Give titan bridges mass limits like wormholes. This limits immeadiate power projection, and thus should be acceptable and still make titans viable.

The cyno should have a mass limit. 5 carriers/dreads, 15 subcaps, or 1 titan/super.

This keeps battles interesting. You can still use the bridge to move a small team around, but not to move your entire coalition at once. People will be able to try new strategies once they don't have to worry about getting megablobbed. Deploying 1 super to support a subcap fleet may become the norm (a nice target for the attackers, a reasonable risk for the defenders because nobody can drop them with 5 seconds notice). The only people who would lose out with this kind of change are the megacoalitions. Smaller nullsec groups and lowsec PVP would benefit the most.

Yes, let's bring it down to the point where no one will use the **** anymore because we can only push roaming gangs through the 80 billion isk strategic asset.

Your roaming gang could always try roaming, using gates, rather than sitting on a titan waiting for a smaller gang to come in range.

Yes, let's bring it down to the point where no one will use the **** anymore because we can only push roaming gangs through the 80 billion isk strategic asset.

Our roaming gangs don't use titans. You have absolutely no clue what happens in null do you?

I have no idea what your original objection was, to be honest. The cyno mass limit is the most sensible, small fix to some of the biggest issues in nullsec. If you think the cyno change would stop people using titans, you're wrong. People don't use them because (1) they're ****, and (2) you can get dropped by anybody at any time with any number of supers. Remove number (2) and people will start using titans a lot more than they do today, a win for titan pilots, a win for smaller groups who don't have N+1 supers available to support their subcap fleets with.

Here's a hint: Structure systems that take large cap/supercap fleets to grind down to reinforced in reasonable periods of time.

There are clearly multiple problems. Blobs of supers and subcaps are #1, structures are #2.

I have no idea what your original objection was, to be honest. The cyno mass limit is the most sensible, small fix to some of the biggest issues in nullsec. If you think the cyno change would stop people using titans, you're wrong. People don't use them because (1) they're ****, and (2) you can get dropped by anybody at any time with any number of supers. Remove number (2) and people will start using titans a lot more than they do today, a win for titan pilots, a win for smaller groups who don't have N+1 supers available to support their subcap fleets with.

You seem to be stuck in last year. You should probably go back and read some patch notes and actually look at what's happening in null.

power projection does not come from having titan bridges and jump bridge networks

power projection comes with the pilots who are willing to log in to fly and risk their ships after a jabber ping

the more pilots you have on standby, the higher the power you can project

You have absolutely no clue what the problems with nullsec are if you think Titans are among them.

Blobs. Blobs. Blobs. Blobs. That's what's happening, and the problem is people can cyno limitless numbers of anything to anywhere instantly. Current blob mobility stops small groups using capitals ever, and it stops small groups competing. It also makes it easy to hold together huge coalitions which are no fun for anybody. Cyno mass limit stops that. It shrinks the massive mega blob coalitions into reasonably sized ones that just defend their own borders.

Problems with null sec: Hundreds of Empty systems, Large Coalitions have no incentives to protect their systems from roaming gangs, little to no incentive to protect systems from small / roaming gangs, long structure grinds, lots of structure grinds to flip sov.

Solution: Nerf the Titan Bridge / Cyno Generation.

Such am assembly of great minds had never been seen before

Blobs. Blobs. Blobs. Blobs. That's what's happening, and the problem is people can cyno limitless numbers of anything to anywhere instantly. Current blob mobility stops small groups using capitals ever, and it stops small groups competing. It also makes it easy to hold together huge coalitions which are no fun for anybody. Cyno mass limit stops that. It shrinks the massive mega blob coalitions into reasonably sized ones that just defend their own borders.

Blobs. Blobs. Blobs. Blobs. That's what's happening, and the problem is people can cyno limitless numbers of anything to anywhere instantly. Current blob mobility stops small groups using capitals ever, and it stops small groups competing. It also makes it easy to hold together huge coalitions which are no fun for anybody. Cyno mass limit stops that. It shrinks the massive mega blob coalitions into reasonably sized ones that just defend their own borders.

did you know that large fleets can also travel by hand ? it takes some time, sometimes even more, but it is absolutely not a problem, and it is a much smaller problem for the big blob entities, because they will have a larger amount of people who are willing to travel a long distance

the smaller entities would be much more troubled, because the one important dude who has to leave early or can't be there before X o'clock can not easily be replaced by another dude since the available pool is much much smaller

Blobs. Blobs. Blobs. Blobs. That's what's happening, and the problem is people can cyno limitless numbers of anything to anywhere instantly. Current blob mobility stops small groups using capitals ever, and it stops small groups competing. It also makes it easy to hold together huge coalitions which are no fun for anybody. Cyno mass limit stops that. It shrinks the massive mega blob coalitions into reasonably sized ones that just defend their own borders.

The real solution is to nerf friend making.

We also tend to stage our fleets as close to the front line as possible so even manual travel isn't that far.

Here's a hint: Structure systems that take large cap/supercap fleets to grind down to reinforced in reasonable periods of time.

Null has needed change pretty much from the moment they changed null last time.
Perhaps sov needs to be by constellation, not system. Sov holder chooses a system, drops his hub. The whole constellation is his. However.....
Instead of the hub being the only target, once sov has been taken, ihub plexes pop up in random locations around the constellation. Attacker can reinforce the ihub by taking down a number of these plexes, number open to argument. It world require the defender to defend his space, not just the Ihub.

So you want to turn nullsec sov warfare in to a PvE activity?