| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |

Feed Syndication
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
If i'm typing a chat-line and this pops up (focused) ... or i was just clicking 'refresh' on my remote industry job (which happens to be located on the same x,y coordinates as the accept button)? Will it honor my 'green' safity status asking me to confirm to this dialog i might have clicked? |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3374
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:36:00 -
[32] - Quote
Roime wrote:Cool, just make sure no killmails are generated from these games.
And this. Definitely this. Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm Want to enable BBcode on the forums? Here's how. |

G0hme
Lead Farmers Kill It With Fire
70
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:36:00 -
[33] - Quote
So, how about that POS REVAMP? Shook Eelm's hand at Fanfest 2012 |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1683
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:37:00 -
[34] - Quote
How many developer hours were spent on this?
How many developer hours do you think it would take to fix just the most egregious elements of POS management (such as adding manageable access lists to a SMA)?
Do you see the problem, here?
It might come as a giant surprise to you, but when people see Eve marketing (trailers, etc) they don't then start playing the game to have childish slap-fights in a market hub. The sooner you get on with creating a game which meets player expectations at the door, the better off you'll be. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Gheyna
Rayn Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
69
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:37:00 -
[35] - Quote
When are we getting raids? |

Nair Alderau
EVE University Ivy League
40
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:37:00 -
[36] - Quote
Good change, I like it.
But do sth. about POSes as well, spread the word in Reykjav+¡k. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1075
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:37:00 -
[37] - Quote
For those people complaining about this happening 'instead of POS rework'
You do know about multiple streams of work, right? And how this is really just restoring an option that crimewatch 2.0 took away? FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities.As well as mysql and CSV/XLS conversions of the Static Data Extract. |

Borlag Crendraven
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
220
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:37:00 -
[38] - Quote
Seriously??? You basically take a huge dump on literally every single player living in wormhole space, a huge portion of people living in null, low and high sec, almost every single industrial player by calling us a minority that doesn't matter, then you go and do something completely and utterly useless as this? Is this a sand box or is it not a sand box?
Seriously considering about unsubbing ALL my accounts because it really appears this game is developed by retards. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3374
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:38:00 -
[39] - Quote
G0hme wrote:So, how about that POS REVAMP? WHAT? I CAN'T HEAR YOU OVER THE SOUND OF GUARD'S SHOTGUNS Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm Want to enable BBcode on the forums? Here's how. |
|

CCP Dolan
C C P C C P Alliance
252

|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:38:00 -
[40] - Quote
Finally I can have truly honourable combat!
1v1 at the sun is now a real 1v1! CCP Dolan | Community Representative
Twitter: @CCPDolan
Gooby pls |
|

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3374
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:39:00 -
[41] - Quote
CCP Dolan wrote:Finally I can have truly honourable combat!
1v1 at the sun is now a real 1v1! Yeah, because you couldn't 1v1 with the current mechanics.
 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm Want to enable BBcode on the forums? Here's how. |

Nair Alderau
EVE University Ivy League
40
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:39:00 -
[42] - Quote
Borlag Crendraven wrote:Seriously??? You basically take a huge dump on literally every single player living in wormhole space, a huge portion of people living in null, low and high sec, almost every single industrial player by calling us a minority that doesn't matter, then you go and do something completely and utterly useless as this? Is this a sand box or is it not a sand box?
Seriously considering about unsubbing ALL my accounts because it really appears this game is developed by retards.
Err... be polite. I am all for the POS revamp, but this change was already coming and in the pipe and was esentially about restoring a mechanic we lost with the Crimewatch changes.
This is a good thing. Doesn't change the fact that we need to reach CCP re: POS. But be polite and constructive if you actually want to reach them. Fury will lead to a much less willing audience. Mind you, be firm, but don't insult them. |

Bubanni
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
630
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:39:00 -
[43] - Quote
I have a suggestion, Honourable duel tags on killmails... Thus a killmail that resulted from your duel is different, potentially a tab/list of killmails from these duels that others can look at if you set it to public. - remote repping ships could be visable on these, so you can see if someone often gets help from a friend... Supercap nerf - change ewar immunity https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194759 Module activation delay! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1180934 |

Nair Alderau
EVE University Ivy League
40
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:41:00 -
[44] - Quote
Bubanni wrote:I have a suggestion, Honourable duel tags on killmails... Thus a killmail that resulted from your duel is different, potentially a tab/list of killmails from these duels that others can look at if you set it to public.
This, So much this.
Just excluding them from killmails is obviously a bid idea, but a tag is pretty interesting... |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3374
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:42:00 -
[45] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:And how this is really just restoring an option that crimewatch 2.0 took away? No, the option was never taken away. About the only thing you can't do is have your 1v1 on Jita undock or a busy highsec gate. If you do it at a safe spot you're pretty much guaranteed to have no interference since nobody's going to bother combat scanning. Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm Want to enable BBcode on the forums? Here's how. |

Borlag Crendraven
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
220
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:42:00 -
[46] - Quote
Nair Alderau wrote:Borlag Crendraven wrote:Seriously??? You basically take a huge dump on literally every single player living in wormhole space, a huge portion of people living in null, low and high sec, almost every single industrial player by calling us a minority that doesn't matter, then you go and do something completely and utterly useless as this? Is this a sand box or is it not a sand box?
Seriously considering about unsubbing ALL my accounts because it really appears this game is developed by retards. Err... be polite. I am all for the POS revamp, but this change was already coming and in the pipe and was esentially about restoring a mechanic we lost with the Crimewatch changes. This is a good thing. Doesn't change the fact that we need to reach CCP re: POS. But be polite and constructive if you actually want to reach them. Fury will lead to a much less willing audience. Mind you, be firm, but don't insult them.
If you'd read the POS thread, you'd quickly learn that it's been over 6 years since the developers promised to look into fixing the POS mechanics. People have been more than patient enough, especially now that CCP is taking back their words and dismissing this entirely. |

Singeabooty Raj
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
394
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:43:00 -
[47] - Quote
I wish that when you accept a duel request concord would magically teleport you to a special space pocket / arena that nobody else could enter until the combat is over. That would be awesome. Black Man with Goggles |

KillaMcgee
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:43:00 -
[48] - Quote
Bubanni wrote:I have a suggestion, Honourable duel tags on killmails... Thus a killmail that resulted from your duel is different, potentially a tab/list of killmails from these duels that others can look at if you set it to public. - remote repping ships could be visable on these, so you can see if someone often gets help from a friend...
or go a step further and completely over haul the killmail system (logi on KM FTW) |

Colonel Xaven
Decadence. RAZOR Alliance
232
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:44:00 -
[49] - Quote
CCP, I really hope you are aware of the danger to develop this into a sort of arena pvp, which would be plain wrong imho.
www.facebook.com/RazorAlliance |

Aurelius Harrison
Aperture Harmonics K162
10
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:44:00 -
[50] - Quote
Quote:However, if the target accepts the challenge, then a 5-minute Limited Engagement is created between the two characters.
Question for clarification. is this 5 minute timer the time in which combat can start? Or a limit on how long the fight can last? I can't imagine many fights created this way lasting more than 5 minutes but it could happen. |

nezrel black
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium Kill It With Fire
2
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:45:00 -
[51] - Quote
Nair Alderau wrote:Borlag Crendraven wrote:Seriously??? You basically take a huge dump on literally every single player living in wormhole space, a huge portion of people living in null, low and high sec, almost every single industrial player by calling us a minority that doesn't matter, then you go and do something completely and utterly useless as this? Is this a sand box or is it not a sand box?
Seriously considering about unsubbing ALL my accounts because it really appears this game is developed by retards. Err... be polite. I am all for the POS revamp, but this change was already coming and in the pipe and was esentially about restoring a mechanic we lost with the Crimewatch changes. This is a good thing. Doesn't change the fact that we need to reach CCP re: POS. But be polite and constructive if you actually want to reach them. Fury will lead to a much less willing audience. Mind you, be firm, but don't insult them.
Only if that change was not postponed / cancelled because it was deemed not important to do for only a minority. See the other thread. |

Alx Warlord
SUPERNOVA SOCIETY Tribal Conclave
314
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:45:00 -
[52] - Quote
Hmm, this is a good feature, I think it will add allot of fun to hi-sec. This was something missed since the new crime watch was set on. Cudos to you...
But If you have not noticed there is something making a big noise over that corner... Sorry but Bad timing for your dev blog... It is really nice althoug.
James Amril-Kesh wrote:G0hme wrote:So, how about that POS REVAMP? WHAT? I CAN'T HEAR YOU OVER THE SOUND OF GUARD'S SHOTGUNS
For more info:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194625
And Also:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=warning&l=http%3a%2f%2fpoeticstanziel.blogspot.com.br%2f2013%2f01%2fwhy-ccp-is-wrong-about-modular-poses.html&domain=blogspot.com.br Please read this! > New POS system (Block Built) Please read this! > Refining and Reprocess Revamp |

JamesCLK
269
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:46:00 -
[53] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:And how this is really just restoring an option that crimewatch 2.0 took away? No, the option was never taken away. About the only thing you can't do is have your 1v1 on Jita undock or a busy highsec gate. If you do it at a safe spot you're pretty much guaranteed to have no interference since nobody's going to bother combat scanning. It didn't work out that great for arranged tournaments though; you couldn't allow spectators, and your contestants had to be carefully managed through adding and kicking fleet members.
Incidentally: I'd like to see a dueling mechanic where you can create multiple teams and assign individual pilots to each. Malcanis for CSM 8! |

AutumnWind1983
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
6
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:46:00 -
[54] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:CCP Masterplan is a man of honor and brings exciting news of a new dueling feature coming to EVE Online on February 12th. Check out the blog here and leave your words right here in the thread...unless they-¦re fighting words of course.
This has to be some kind of terrible joke. You guys are wasting time on this? What's the point of the CSM with something like this? What's the point of panels at fanfest?
You guys are missing all the potential that POS could be for doing things like encouraging more people to live in w-space by actually addressing security concerns or do more industry outside of high sec by making it more efficient than high sec.
Taking for granted, in the terms presented by CCP during the CSM meetings, enablers and lurkers by ignoring POS is a great way to pour battery acid on the sand box that is eve instead of giving it some fertilizer and letting something grow. |

Rek Seven
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
578
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:46:00 -
[55] - Quote
CCP Dolan wrote:Finally I can have truly honourable combat!
1v1 at the sun is now a real 1v1!
Or so an off grid booster would have you believe  Why i play EVE:-á20% for gameplay experience, 30% for the social aspect and 50% because of CCPGÇÖs empty promises.-á |

Namagon
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:46:00 -
[56] - Quote
As no one else mentioned it
OFF GRID BOOSTS
disable them while dueling or something - its not honourable to cheat as many do now.
I like the idea, but how it works in Eve is often different kettle of fish |

Aprudena Gist
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
20
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:46:00 -
[57] - Quote
Why in the **** would you waste dev time on something as ******* pointless as this and not do something useful. |
|

CCP Masterplan
C C P C C P Alliance
1000

|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:46:00 -
[58] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Nice feature. You could record stats of someones dueling history so they can display it on their character sheet with pride. That's an interesting idea.
Malrock wrote:All fine for fun, but please, put under game client generic options a checkmark for auto declining all duel requests.
Thank You. This is certainly something we could do, similar to the 'Auto Reject Invitations' chat option
Pinky Denmark wrote:
- Find noob target in weak ship
- Issue challenge
- Find more noob targets and repeat while waiting
- ...
- If lucky, gank target with an overpowered ship
- Profit
You can only have one pending challenge at a time, precisely because blindly spamming local with multiple challenges at once is something we want to avoid.
Valkyrs wrote:Looks interesting! Can you disable keyboard input on the window? If I'm yammering away in chat while I'm undocking from Jita with a boat full of goods, I would be quite upset to accidently start a duel.
Alternatively, allow users to block duel outright, or have a 1 minute timer where users can cancel the duel before it starts, or put it in a duel menu or something.
Please have some precautions.
Keep up the good work!
That is something we're aware of, and will try to make sure doesn't happen. The default action on hitting Return is to refuse the challenge.
Chribba wrote:I prefer mining lasers! No surprise huh? Very well. Bring your best Strip Miner and I'll see you at dawn.
"This one time, on patch day..." CCP Masterplan -á| -áTeam Five-0: Rewriting the law |
|

Nair Alderau
EVE University Ivy League
43
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:48:00 -
[59] - Quote
Borlag Crendraven wrote:Nair Alderau wrote:Borlag Crendraven wrote:Seriously??? You basically take a huge dump on literally every single player living in wormhole space, a huge portion of people living in null, low and high sec, almost every single industrial player by calling us a minority that doesn't matter, then you go and do something completely and utterly useless as this? Is this a sand box or is it not a sand box?
Seriously considering about unsubbing ALL my accounts because it really appears this game is developed by retards. Err... be polite. I am all for the POS revamp, but this change was already coming and in the pipe and was esentially about restoring a mechanic we lost with the Crimewatch changes. This is a good thing. Doesn't change the fact that we need to reach CCP re: POS. But be polite and constructive if you actually want to reach them. Fury will lead to a much less willing audience. Mind you, be firm, but don't insult them. If you'd read the POS thread, you'd quickly learn that it's been over 6 years since the developers promised to look into fixing the POS mechanics. People have been more than patient enough, especially now that CCP is taking back their words and dismissing this entirely.
If you'd read the POS thread, you'd notice half a dozen posts of mine in there. If you'd read GD, you'd see several posts of mine pointing people to Two Step's thread.
I still stand by what I said. This feature had also been promised, it's a pretty small fix and hardly competing with the POS revamp.
POS revamp needs to happen and I am trying my best to make people communicate this.
Have a look... |

Othran
Route One
408
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:48:00 -
[60] - Quote
Singeabooty Raj wrote:I wish that when you accept a duel request concord would magically teleport you to a special space pocket / arena that nobody else could enter until the combat is over. That would be awesome.
...and not return you.
Now that WOULD be awesome  |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |