| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |
BEPOHNKA
Legions Force
14
   |
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:01:00 -
[121] - Quote
Well it can become a nice sport of income something new  |
Tiberius Patterson
Phantom Consortium
Kraken.
16
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:05:00 -
[122] - Quote
BEPOHNKA wrote:Tiberius Patterson wrote:BEPOHNKA wrote:Ideas is nice in all but it's time we look at this type of idea harder...
We all like to do duels and tournaments and maybe leagues some day....
So, I ask you look in to adding a tournament duel idea were more then one person can duel, in groups
corps alliances be added in on this type of duel... plus allow change of isk, i bet you 20m we win type style...
league would be nice to add in this type of game as we all love to be on top and maybe be part of hall of fame.... Involving corps and alliances already exists: It's called a WarDec. You say Wardec is limited to kills only and keep track of when you win..... point of a league or tournament is income wining stuff. That's my point plus with a duel I would like to bet few million I could win the fight... maybe a third party could work this out :) league is men't for very long 3 to 4 months with as many people join as they like, and with a duel idea like this you can save ISK from wardeck.... so any engagement you can just fuel and add it in API form to a board... so hope this clears up your question...
Hm... That certainly is intriguing... It would get more people interested in PvP. Plus, Alliance Tournament teams could use it for practice. Plus, you could have different divisions, like 1v1, 5v5, 10v10, etc. |
Niveuss Nye
The Advent of Faith
4
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:11:00 -
[123] - Quote
fine and good. But have the ability to autoblock duels or it could quickly get anoying. |
Colonel Xaven
Decadence.
RAZOR Alliance
236
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:13:00 -
[124] - Quote
Tiberius Patterson wrote:BEPOHNKA wrote:Tiberius Patterson wrote:BEPOHNKA wrote:Ideas is nice in all but it's time we look at this type of idea harder...
We all like to do duels and tournaments and maybe leagues some day....
So, I ask you look in to adding a tournament duel idea were more then one person can duel, in groups
corps alliances be added in on this type of duel... plus allow change of isk, i bet you 20m we win type style...
league would be nice to add in this type of game as we all love to be on top and maybe be part of hall of fame.... Involving corps and alliances already exists: It's called a WarDec. You say Wardec is limited to kills only and keep track of when you win..... point of a league or tournament is income wining stuff. That's my point plus with a duel I would like to bet few million I could win the fight... maybe a third party could work this out :) league is men't for very long 3 to 4 months with as many people join as they like, and with a duel idea like this you can save ISK from wardeck.... so any engagement you can just fuel and add it in API form to a board... so hope this clears up your question... Hm... That certainly is intriguing... It would get more people interested in PvP. Plus, Alliance Tournament teams could use it for practice. Plus, you could have different divisions, like 1v1, 5v5, 10v10, etc.
That all can be done with a little bit of organization. On the test servers.
And now back to the harsh, cruel, pvp-based sandbox MMO called EvE Online, which is different than WoW etc.
www.facebook.com/RazorAlliance |
Miles Forrester
Reverberation Inc
The Veyr Collective
7
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:16:00 -
[125] - Quote
It's time to Duel!
I know a few people who will love the new system (likely including myself  ) |
Malka Badi'a
Suffoco Noctis
24
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:22:00 -
[126] - Quote
What a perfect opportunity to take advantage of the new bounty system. A hundred mill on each dueler I see should help get the message across.
That's a lot of Amarr dueling frigates to lose, children. |
Zarnak Wulf
In Exile.
943
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:24:00 -
[127] - Quote
I thought the best way to duel was to get drunk and hang out on the Arzad undock in faction fitted bling. No? |
fukier
RISE of LEGION
723
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:29:00 -
[128] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gent BF wrote:I don't get it..
why you call it a DUEL if others can still Interfere ? Because it's a duel? There's nothing about duels that makes it impossible for people to interfere GÇö it's just dishonourable to do so. If you choose pistols at dawn, the roving band of bandits that happen to find you, and decide to rob you blind, will not particularly care about the elegance of your second's cravat or the eloquence of the challenge you make to your opponent. They will just want you to hand over the guns, valuables and silk socks. Othran wrote:Why are we trying to give high-sec more of the "benefits*" of low-sec when there's limited incentive to go there now?
There are methods to deal with this in low-sec and have been for years. GǪand there have been methods to deal with this in highsec for years. This is simply the return of those methods after Crimewatch accidentally removed them. No new or special benefits are being handed out.
ffs i just liked a tippa post
At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |
Seetesh
Hand of the Sword
20
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:32:00 -
[129] - Quote
You should modify kill mails so that the dual shows on the mail. |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1515
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:37:00 -
[130] - Quote
Two step wrote:To all the folks posting here and POSes, please stop. This has nothing at all to do with the POS system, until I can challenge another POS to a duel.
That's a great idea!
POSes could be designators for group vs group duels. That is when the challenge is issued and accepted, all ships near POS 1 can fight all ships near POS 2, irrelevant of fleet status. That way you do not have to wonder about extra fleet members hiding in safe spots, or added to the fleet after the duel starts. Just look at what is near the other POS and you know what has a legal right to shoot you. But for that to work we need to be able to place 2 POSes close enough to each other that you can in fact look at the ships near the other POS.
http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
|
|
Lex Lynn
Blue Republic
RvB - BLUE Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:39:00 -
[131] - Quote
Is it possible to add a Friendly Duel check box that terminates the flag at structure? This would be a fantastic learning tool. :) |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1077
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:43:00 -
[132] - Quote
Lex Lynn wrote:Is it possible to add a Friendly Duel check box that terminates the flag at structure? This would be a fantastic learning tool. :)
You might as well fight on sisi then.
The duals as described are just fine.
FuzzWork Enterprises
http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities.As well as mysql and CSV/XLS conversions of the Static Data Extract. |
Rordan D'Kherr
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
403
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:44:00 -
[133] - Quote
Duels in hisec
"I want a duel"
"No"
*sadpandaface*
Fast forward
"I want your space"
"No"
*sadpandaface*
Peace in New Eden all over the place.
_______________________________________
Don't be scared, because being afk is not a crime. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
12685
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:50:00 -
[134] - Quote
Rordan D'Kherr wrote:Duels in hisec GǪhave existed since roughly forever. Why are people so upset that they're restoring lost functionality? Is it because the issuer can't call in the help from his logi alts with impunity any more?
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
1006
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:53:00 -
[135] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Rordan D'Kherr wrote:Duels in hisec GǪhave existed since roughly forever. Why are people so upset that they're restoring lost functionality? Is it because the issuer can't call in the help from his logi alts with impunity any more?
My guess would be yes.
|
bufnitza calatoare
Nex Angelus.
Unclaimed.
56
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:55:00 -
[136] - Quote
this is 1 to 3 steps away from high sec arena's |
Rordan D'Kherr
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
403
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:56:00 -
[137] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Rordan D'Kherr wrote:Duels in hisec GǪhave existed since roughly forever. Why are people so upset that they're restoring lost functionality? Is it because the issuer can't call in the help from his logi alts with impunity any more?
You missed the point, which is this
bufnitza calatoare wrote:this is 1 to 3 steps away from high sec arena's
_______________________________________
Don't be scared, because being afk is not a crime. |
Mekhana
Spiritus Draconis
Sicarius Draconis
739
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:06:00 -
[138] - Quote
I want an option for us low and null seccers to automatically block duel requests so we don't get pop ups.
SP-DR is recruiting:http://spdr.enjin.com |
Porucznik Borewicz
Love Squad
Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
5
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:07:00 -
[139] - Quote
- Challenges will respect the Block option in the contact list. If you have blocked another character, that character will not be able to issue challenges to you.
Expand this to be able to block whole corps / alliances and we are good to go in the topic of "chellenge bombing". OK? |
St Mio
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
1106
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:07:00 -
[140] - Quote
Jeez.
All they're doing is taking an existing work around and giving it a nice sensible purpose built interface.
You people are acting as if CCP is trying to stop you from shooting other players, when they're doing the exact opposite. |
|
|
Othran
Route One
420
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:16:00 -
[141] - Quote
Tippia wrote: This is simply the return of those methods after Crimewatch accidentally removed them. No new or special benefits are being handed out.
No its not as we'll see in the next 6 months.
You want to fight someone in high-sec then what's the problem? Don't do it on station - oh look 99% of high-sec warfare fixed  |
fukier
RISE of LEGION
724
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:16:00 -
[142] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:CCP Dolan wrote:Finally I can have truly honourable combat!
1v1 at the sun is now a real 1v1! Yeah, because you couldn't 1v1 with the current mechanics. 
no you cant due to crimewatch...
At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |
fukier
RISE of LEGION
724
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:17:00 -
[143] - Quote
Two step wrote:To all the folks posting here and POSes, please stop. This has nothing at all to do with the POS system, until I can challenge another POS to a duel.
hahah twostepp is now don quixote
At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |
Della Monk
Monastery of Drakes
38
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:18:00 -
[144] - Quote
bufnitza calatoare wrote:this is 1 to 3 steps away from high sec arena's
How, exactly? Letting people tell Concord to stay out of a fight is a different beast entirely from telling players to stay out of a fight |
Shasz
Angels of Anarchy
AL3XAND3R.
27
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:19:00 -
[145] - Quote
From the devblog: "As soon as a challenge is responded to, you can move on to issuing the next request, so setting up a 3v3 for example will still be quick and easy if everyone is on the ball."
If my math is correct, setting up a 3v3 would require 9 challenges. 4v4, 16 challenges. A mock alliance tournament match anywhere from 64 to 100. (8v8 or 10v10)
I fail to see how that is quick or easy.
But it does solve the 1v1 duel easily. |
fukier
RISE of LEGION
724
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:23:00 -
[146] - Quote
Othran wrote:Tippia wrote: This is simply the return of those methods after Crimewatch accidentally removed them. No new or special benefits are being handed out. No its not as we'll see in the next 6 months. You want to fight someone in high-sec then what's the problem? Don't do it on station - oh look 99% of high-sec warfare fixed
its called a fleet and wtm... so no not 99% fixed you ding bat!
At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |
Maxpie
Metaphysical Utopian Society Explorations
230
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:24:00 -
[147] - Quote
I don't like the direction this is taking us quite honestly. What's next, the loser of the duel reappears in a ghost ship and has to warp to his wreck where everything re-materializes?
There is a difference between helpful interface/game mechanics and the theme park handholding you get in other games. Why can't we have just this one game that is different from all the others? If I wanted to play WoW or Star Wars, or whatever, I would, but I don't. Why push me away? |
Danny Hanther
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:27:00 -
[148] - Quote
Rordan D'Kherr wrote:Tippia wrote:Rordan D'Kherr wrote:Duels in hisec GǪhave existed since roughly forever. Why are people so upset that they're restoring lost functionality? Is it because the issuer can't call in the help from his logi alts with impunity any more? You missed the point, which is this bufnitza calatoare wrote:this is 1 to 3 steps away from high sec arena's
sounds a little... http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/slippery-slope.html |
Lord Wiggin
Furian Necromongers
73
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:29:00 -
[149] - Quote
Not sure how this is exciting....it's not a duel when you can still have outside interference.....
Basically you are returning a functionality that you broke with crimewatch....
Should have listened to me CCP..... |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
12692
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:29:00 -
[150] - Quote
Rordan D'Kherr wrote:You missed the point, which is this bufnitza calatoare wrote:this is 1 to 3 steps away from high sec arena's No, that is not a point. It's a slippery slope fallacy based on pure ignorance of how the game works.
Restoration of lost functionality does not inexorably lead to instancing and insular protection, especially when nothing of the kind existed in either the original and the revamped implementation.
So the point remains: why are people so upset over the broken things getting fixed?
Othran wrote:No its not as we'll see in the next 6 months. Nice lack of explanation there.
In what way is it not a restoration of lost functionality?
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |