Monitor this thread via RSS [?]
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page
Author Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
MIstress Saki
MIstress Saki

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 21:36:00 - [331]

A Tech II Battle Cruiser (Amarr). Where I can fit a full range of Tech II Heavy Beams without problems.

or

A Tech II "bird of pray" "submarine" Battle Cruiser spez. in claoking
MIstress Saki
MIstress Saki

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 21:36:00 - [332]

A Tech II Battle Cruiser (Amarr). Where I can fit a full range of Tech II Heavy Beams without problems.

or

A Tech II "bird of pray" "submarine" Battle Cruiser spez. in claoking
Jester87
Jester87

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 22:01:00 - [333]

Edited by: Jester87 on 21/07/2005 22:03:38
I would like to see the Deadalus from Stargate... Thing is awesome. Plus it uses rail guns and stuff... which is sorta realistic.


of course a Star Destroyer, or a Mon-Calmarian Cruiser would be nice too...

Best bet, is the Death-Star tho.. 1 Shot to blow up any ship ;)
Jester87
Jester87
D00M.
Triumvirate.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 22:01:00 - [334]

Edited by: Jester87 on 21/07/2005 22:03:38
I would like to see the Deadalus from Stargate... Thing is awesome. Plus it uses rail guns and stuff... which is sorta realistic.


of course a Star Destroyer, or a Mon-Calmarian Cruiser would be nice too...

Best bet, is the Death-Star tho.. 1 Shot to blow up any ship ;)


willows
willows

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 22:44:00 - [335]

Transwarp prior to ST:TNG is unscaleable as in ST:3 they used a warp scale that went upto 12.
And all sucsesfull transwarp's have been on the later TNG scale that goes to 10.

Warp 10 is the point where the reach the destination anywhere in the galaxy almost the moment they leave and sofar only entitys like Q have demonstrated this.

this is more like a long range transporter than warpdrive and as such the first atempt at it was infact in a recent ST:Enterprise episode.

Transwarp however is the point of warp between 9.99 to warp 9.99.99.
Borg use a coil to acheive the lower ends of this.
but as seen in VOY: endgame use a transwarphub to reach the higher ends.





willows
willows

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 22:44:00 - [336]

Transwarp prior to ST:TNG is unscaleable as in ST:3 they used a warp scale that went upto 12.
And all sucsesfull transwarp's have been on the later TNG scale that goes to 10.

Warp 10 is the point where the reach the destination anywhere in the galaxy almost the moment they leave and sofar only entitys like Q have demonstrated this.

this is more like a long range transporter than warpdrive and as such the first atempt at it was infact in a recent ST:Enterprise episode.

Transwarp however is the point of warp between 9.99 to warp 9.99.99.
Borg use a coil to acheive the lower ends of this.
but as seen in VOY: endgame use a transwarphub to reach the higher ends.





Vivus Mors
Vivus Mors

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 23:02:00 - [337]

Originally by: Kaalise
Then there's always Quantum Slipstream.


well, Quantum Slipstream is another area where things become sticky, as itÆs merely a means of ôpressingö a slipstream around the ship thatÆs more effective than the alternative multiple layers of ôwarp fieldö around the ship, 1 layer for each factor of warp speed.

Trek Tech

a means of Quantum Slipstream is ôbetterö than the current methods of pushing the warp factors harder (which according to the story were eventually limited except for emergencies to prevent subspace damage to the space being traveled through) and reaching into the sub-factors of warp 9à such as 9.975 being ôwide openö top speed for most of the fastest Federation shipsÆ capabilities. Quantum Slipstream provides a much more efficient subspace barrier between the ship and the space it is flying through at ludicrous speed.

However the BorgÆs example of a transwarp answer as mentioned before was to effectively ôgateö their way across space.

ItÆs sort of the idea of, going faster will take you less time to arrive, or if you simply make the destination effectively ôcloserö then the trip distance isnÆt as profound so effectively you get there faster. ItÆs sort of ôtrans warpö in multiple different flavors with different methods to get the same result.

At the end of the day, Quantum Slipstream is actually only an extension of conventional warp drive speeds, itÆs questionable to how the chart should then look factoring in a more efficient and thus faster speed of warping when there is also an alternative means of effectively equal speed that circumvents ôdistance over timeö by making the distance effectively less so the time needed to cross it is thus less resulting in a ôdistance traveled in an amount of timeö result comparable to a speed, even if little if any speed was involvedà

Once it gets to 8 and 9, the ôentryö afterward is debatable then as to whether to call it ôtranswarp Iö or ôwarp 10ö, and beyond that, further factors are again questionable as either ôtranswarp IIö or ôwarp 11ö.

Since quantum slipstream is not conventional warp speed, and it is beyond the warp 9 to warp 10 barrier, itÆs technically correct to call it ôtranswarpö, but since it uses basically conventional warp with very un-conventional ôwarp fieldö technology, the hair may need to be split and possibly a separate chart for ôgenuineö transwarp that uses a non-slipstream methodology, and a second chart for ôslipstreamö factors of warp.

Perhaps the slipstream warp factor chart would read, ôwarp 9, 10, 11, etcö, and the transwarp propulsion chart would read ôwarp 8, 9 : Transwarp I, Transwarp IIö

-------------------------------------------------
For the price of one can of Quafe cola a day, you can adopt an Ewok... Please... think of the Ewoks...
Vivus Mors
Vivus Mors

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 23:02:00 - [338]

Originally by: Kaalise
Then there's always Quantum Slipstream.


well, Quantum Slipstream is another area where things become sticky, as itÆs merely a means of ôpressingö a slipstream around the ship thatÆs more effective than the alternative multiple layers of ôwarp fieldö around the ship, 1 layer for each factor of warp speed.

Trek Tech

a means of Quantum Slipstream is ôbetterö than the current methods of pushing the warp factors harder (which according to the story were eventually limited except for emergencies to prevent subspace damage to the space being traveled through) and reaching into the sub-factors of warp 9à such as 9.975 being ôwide openö top speed for most of the fastest Federation shipsÆ capabilities. Quantum Slipstream provides a much more efficient subspace barrier between the ship and the space it is flying through at ludicrous speed.

However the BorgÆs example of a transwarp answer as mentioned before was to effectively ôgateö their way across space.

ItÆs sort of the idea of, going faster will take you less time to arrive, or if you simply make the destination effectively ôcloserö then the trip distance isnÆt as profound so effectively you get there faster. ItÆs sort of ôtrans warpö in multiple different flavors with different methods to get the same result.

At the end of the day, Quantum Slipstream is actually only an extension of conventional warp drive speeds, itÆs questionable to how the chart should then look factoring in a more efficient and thus faster speed of warping when there is also an alternative means of effectively equal speed that circumvents ôdistance over timeö by making the distance effectively less so the time needed to cross it is thus less resulting in a ôdistance traveled in an amount of timeö result comparable to a speed, even if little if any speed was involvedà

Once it gets to 8 and 9, the ôentryö afterward is debatable then as to whether to call it ôtranswarp Iö or ôwarp 10ö, and beyond that, further factors are again questionable as either ôtranswarp IIö or ôwarp 11ö.

Since quantum slipstream is not conventional warp speed, and it is beyond the warp 9 to warp 10 barrier, itÆs technically correct to call it ôtranswarpö, but since it uses basically conventional warp with very un-conventional ôwarp fieldö technology, the hair may need to be split and possibly a separate chart for ôgenuineö transwarp that uses a non-slipstream methodology, and a second chart for ôslipstreamö factors of warp.

Perhaps the slipstream warp factor chart would read, ôwarp 9, 10, 11, etcö, and the transwarp propulsion chart would read ôwarp 8, 9 : Transwarp I, Transwarp IIö
------------------------------------------------
UPDATED March 11 Formal request for improvements to industrialism
Hllaxiu
Hllaxiu

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 23:26:00 - [339]

Originally by: Vivus Mors

The reason that ôwarp 10ö fried the genes of VoyagersÆ personnel is that it was of course poorly controlled (read as: basically uncontrolled) and the side effects resulted from it. The Borg have their technology behind the transwarp already figured out for them, all they had to do was assimilate it, so their ôsafety precautionsö came pre-developed.



I'm sorry, but retcons for the worst voyager episode are simply not acceptable. Its far better to say that that episode doesn't exist and just go on your merry way with your "warp 13" speeds in "All good things..." and your transwarp tunnels of the last episode of Voyager.

Oh, and I stick by my prior "Hydrans ftw" statement.

Hllaxiu
Hllaxiu
Shiva
Morsus Mihi

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 23:26:00 - [340]

Originally by: Vivus Mors

The reason that ôwarp 10ö fried the genes of VoyagersÆ personnel is that it was of course poorly controlled (read as: basically uncontrolled) and the side effects resulted from it. The Borg have their technology behind the transwarp already figured out for them, all they had to do was assimilate it, so their ôsafety precautionsö came pre-developed.



I'm sorry, but retcons for the worst voyager episode are simply not acceptable. Its far better to say that that episode doesn't exist and just go on your merry way with your "warp 13" speeds in "All good things..." and your transwarp tunnels of the last episode of Voyager.

Oh, and I stick by my prior "Hydrans ftw" statement.

---
Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Emerson
Lucian Alucard
Lucian Alucard

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 23:40:00 - [341]

Martok's Negh' Var- 50% more fire then a Sovreign,Cloaking capability,tho significantly slower (only warp 8.5),Ion pulse cannon (drops sheilds to 50% in one shot due to it being a spin off of Been technology)

Osiris- From Freelancer,Rheinland damage mixed with the speed and tech systems of Liberty and it can cloak!!!

A Thrasher or Munin that can fit a full rack of T2 720MM Artys. and still be able to fit a good set up.




Undisputed Lord Of The Forums!!!

The best joke ever!!!!
http://www.livejournal.com/users/sweet__kitty/40953.html?mode=reply
Lucian Alucard
Lucian Alucard
Caldari
Generals Of Destruction Syndicate
Terror In The System

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.21 23:40:00 - [342]

Martok's Negh' Var- 50% more fire then a Sovreign,Cloaking capability,tho significantly slower (only warp 8.5),Ion pulse cannon (drops sheilds to 50% in one shot due to it being a spin off of Been technology)

Osiris- From Freelancer,Rheinland damage mixed with the speed and tech systems of Liberty and it can cloak!!!

A Thrasher or Munin that can fit a full rack of T2 720MM Artys. and still be able to fit a good set up.



Vivus Mors
Vivus Mors

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 02:32:00 - [343]

Originally by: Hllaxiu
Originally by: Vivus Mors

The reason that ôwarp 10ö fried the genes of VoyagersÆ personnel is that it was of course poorly controlled (read as: basically uncontrolled) and the side effects resulted from it. The Borg have their technology behind the transwarp already figured out for them, all they had to do was assimilate it, so their ôsafety precautionsö came pre-developed.



I'm sorry, but retcons for the worst voyager episode are simply not acceptable. Its far better to say that that episode doesn't exist and just go on your merry way with your "warp 13" speeds in "All good things..." and your transwarp tunnels of the last episode of Voyager.

Oh, and I stick by my prior "Hydrans ftw" statement.



lol well, I didn't say I liked Voyager (to say I only despised it is far too weak a term to describe it properly) but sadly, it's canon. Just as much as many people would like to have had "Star Wars - George Lucas = Happy Fans" for Episode 1 and 2, sadly, it's not the case, and now we all have to live with the consequencesà

If there is one thing we can count on though is inconsistency in Sci-Fi, so as long as Paramount is in it for the money (i.e. until space stops being dark) they will happily grind Star Trek into the ground one TV series at a time and with as many movies as there is celluloid to print them on. ItÆs only a matter of time till they step back and re-work their canon again to fit into a new set of rules they are writing as they go.

-------------------------------------------------
For the price of one can of Quafe cola a day, you can adopt an Ewok... Please... think of the Ewoks...
Vivus Mors
Vivus Mors

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 02:32:00 - [344]

Originally by: Hllaxiu
Originally by: Vivus Mors

The reason that ôwarp 10ö fried the genes of VoyagersÆ personnel is that it was of course poorly controlled (read as: basically uncontrolled) and the side effects resulted from it. The Borg have their technology behind the transwarp already figured out for them, all they had to do was assimilate it, so their ôsafety precautionsö came pre-developed.



I'm sorry, but retcons for the worst voyager episode are simply not acceptable. Its far better to say that that episode doesn't exist and just go on your merry way with your "warp 13" speeds in "All good things..." and your transwarp tunnels of the last episode of Voyager.

Oh, and I stick by my prior "Hydrans ftw" statement.



lol well, I didn't say I liked Voyager (to say I only despised it is far too weak a term to describe it properly) but sadly, it's canon. Just as much as many people would like to have had "Star Wars - George Lucas = Happy Fans" for Episode 1 and 2, sadly, it's not the case, and now we all have to live with the consequencesà

If there is one thing we can count on though is inconsistency in Sci-Fi, so as long as Paramount is in it for the money (i.e. until space stops being dark) they will happily grind Star Trek into the ground one TV series at a time and with as many movies as there is celluloid to print them on. ItÆs only a matter of time till they step back and re-work their canon again to fit into a new set of rules they are writing as they go.
------------------------------------------------
UPDATED March 11 Formal request for improvements to industrialism
Jokastis
Jokastis

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 03:06:00 - [345]

ok, simple enough Smile

I would want my dream ship to be able to use all of the slots in the fittings display.

Hi:8 (8 Turret / 8 Missle slots)
Med:8
Low:8

With enough powergrid and cpu to fit 8 guns or missles of my choice.

And a capacitor that would support a shield and armor tank indefinitely. And a good tank at that, with resistances sitting at around 80% or above.

That would be great Very Happy
Can it be done by next Tuesday?
Jokastis
Jokastis

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 03:06:00 - [346]

ok, simple enough Smile

I would want my dream ship to be able to use all of the slots in the fittings display.

Hi:8 (8 Turret / 8 Missle slots)
Med:8
Low:8

With enough powergrid and cpu to fit 8 guns or missles of my choice.

And a capacitor that would support a shield and armor tank indefinitely. And a good tank at that, with resistances sitting at around 80% or above.

That would be great Very Happy
Can it be done by next Tuesday?
Pointless Vengence
Pointless Vengence

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 04:49:00 - [347]

For you Trekies: Coaxial Warp Drive . . .Discuss . .. enjoy

For the rest of ya:

I'd love to fly the "Black Hole Bomb" ship from Gunbuster (old school Manga) . . . Basically Jupiter is compressed to 1/30,000 its size into a ship which then can use it to form a black hole. What would I do with the ship? Black mail all of Eve's governments of course . . . Twisted Evil
Pointless Vengence
Pointless Vengence

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 04:49:00 - [348]

For you Trekies: Coaxial Warp Drive . . .Discuss . .. enjoy

For the rest of ya:

I'd love to fly the "Black Hole Bomb" ship from Gunbuster (old school Manga) . . . Basically Jupiter is compressed to 1/30,000 its size into a ship which then can use it to form a black hole. What would I do with the ship? Black mail all of Eve's governments of course . . . Twisted Evil
Darlan Flame
Darlan Flame

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 05:15:00 - [349]

Well if you follow the 1-10 warp drive warp scale where warp 10 is infinity, a number impossible to go higher than, you realize that every time someone in star trek went past warp 10, it was a lousy writer trying to impress us with bigger numbers, as they were too lazy to follow their own mythos strictly.

How do you go past warp 10?

Well first you flunk out of community college...
Darlan Flame
Darlan Flame
GoonFleet

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 05:15:00 - [350]

Well if you follow the 1-10 warp drive warp scale where warp 10 is infinity, a number impossible to go higher than, you realize that every time someone in star trek went past warp 10, it was a lousy writer trying to impress us with bigger numbers, as they were too lazy to follow their own mythos strictly.

How do you go past warp 10?

Well first you flunk out of community college...
Kyrie Allayson
Kyrie Allayson

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 06:46:00 - [351]

Victory class destroyer from B5 :)

Victory

Kyrie Allayson
Kyrie Allayson
0utbreak

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 06:46:00 - [352]

Victory class destroyer from B5 :)

Victory


willows
willows

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 10:48:00 - [353]

Originally by: Darlan Flame
Well if you follow the 1-10 warp drive warp scale where warp 10 is infinity, a number impossible to go higher than, you realize that every time someone in star trek went past warp 10, it was a lousy writer trying to impress us with bigger numbers, as they were too lazy to follow their own mythos strictly.

How do you go past warp 10?

Well first you flunk out of community college...


Unfortunatly this is true.
i blame Rick Berman for most of these plot clashes with most Startech.

Warp 10 is instant arival anywhere as soon as you leave.
no matter the distance between point a and b.
Now this is as far as i know never been said in a episode but on that theory warp10+ would infact be time travel.
As it would require you to arive before you leave.
willows
willows

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 10:48:00 - [354]

Originally by: Darlan Flame
Well if you follow the 1-10 warp drive warp scale where warp 10 is infinity, a number impossible to go higher than, you realize that every time someone in star trek went past warp 10, it was a lousy writer trying to impress us with bigger numbers, as they were too lazy to follow their own mythos strictly.

How do you go past warp 10?

Well first you flunk out of community college...


Unfortunatly this is true.
i blame Rick Berman for most of these plot clashes with most Startech.

Warp 10 is instant arival anywhere as soon as you leave.
no matter the distance between point a and b.
Now this is as far as i know never been said in a episode but on that theory warp10+ would infact be time travel.
As it would require you to arive before you leave.
BLAIYNE
BLAIYNE

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 11:29:00 - [355]

Originally by: Horg
The Event Horizon :D

... for those who've seen the movie


What, you mean a ship that tries to kill it's crew in various nasty ways, then halfway through a fleet battle warps straight to Hell?

Yes...I like it!

(As long as I don't have to fly it!)


BLAIYNE
BLAIYNE
Shadow Play

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 11:29:00 - [356]

Originally by: Horg
The Event Horizon :D

... for those who've seen the movie


What, you mean a ship that tries to kill it's crew in various nasty ways, then halfway through a fleet battle warps straight to Hell?

Yes...I like it!

(As long as I don't have to fly it!)


BLAIYNE
BLAIYNE

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 11:40:00 - [357]

Edited by: BLAIYNE on 22/07/2005 11:41:01
Myself, I vote for the Romulan Warbird.

Now that's how a cloaking device is supposed to work CCP - none of that hanging around waiting to be killed when you un-cloak.

Uncloak, unleash awesome firepower on unsuspecting victim, cloak, be on your way - that's the way to do it!

Warbird

Oh, and they look cool.


BLAIYNE
BLAIYNE
Shadow Play

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 11:40:00 - [358]

Edited by: BLAIYNE on 22/07/2005 11:41:01
Myself, I vote for the Romulan Warbird.

Now that's how a cloaking device is supposed to work CCP - none of that hanging around waiting to be killed when you un-cloak.

Uncloak, unleash awesome firepower on unsuspecting victim, cloak, be on your way - that's the way to do it!

Warbird

Oh, and they look cool.


fairimear
fairimear

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 13:03:00 - [359]

i love the new warbird valor



(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world Domination.
fairimear
fairimear
Gallente
S.A.S
Cruel Intentions

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2005.07.22 13:03:00 - [360]

i love the new warbird valor






Makeing your npc hunters SS.
   
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page
 
Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,09s, ref 20250620/1042
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.