Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
659
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
If carebears were willing to lose a 200 million ISK ship, every time they mine 1 billion ISK in ore or grind up a billion ISK in mission rewards, I think the PvPers would not be so angry with them.
The simple truth is, I am not willing to accept even that level of loss. I would rather lose 1 billion ISK in opportunity cost of not undocking rather than lose even a 50 million ISK ship. I can grind up a billion ISK a week, and if I lose a ship every 3 months, it is too much for me. Way, way too much.
I've lost 0 ships in the last 9 months.... yeah, that's just about the right amount of loss.
And, the other carebears I've played the game with (100s), are pretty much in agreement that absolutely 0 loss is pretty much the correct amount.
I get it why the PvPers are so frustrated by us. I really do.
Problem is, it is my experience, that this is NOT going to go away. ANY attempt to try to get us to accept a higher than "virtually 0" loss is simply going to result in us quitting the game. AND, based on my experience with high sec and null, and the % of players in each of these areas of space, and the play styles in each area, the carebears are a HUGE chunk of teh revenue stream.
War Dec: Industry corp gets war decced. PvPers say, come out and fight. What actually happens? No one logs in, or if they do log in, they do not undock. The players drop to NPC corps, or spin up a temp corp and switch to that. Very, very few ships actually go boom becuase of high sec war dec vs. industry corp.
Low: No one mines, and odds are, that ratter is really bait.
Null cloaky camper: Dito the above industrial corp war dec. No one undocks.
Null roaming gang in the area, upto 3 jumps out? Everyone safe's up, and stays safed up for as long as it takes for the roaming gang to leave.
The simple reality is, the carebears/nullbears are NEVER going to accept even a 10-20% loss in ships as percent of value they mine. It is fundamentally against our nature to play a game where we are easy targets for PvPers. |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
3875
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
So youre saying we should remove CONCORD.
agreed. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Malak Dawnfire
The Scope Gallente Federation
123
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
Maybe if High sec wasn't so safe, Low sec might actually be a viable place to travel instead of the instant death near empire camps.  |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
202
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
I give you a quote from our friendly devs:
"I don't like complete security, and I do like when a large group of players who live in complete security have that pulled away temporarily. It's going to be healthy." Don't worry miners, I'm here to help!
|

Yokai Mitsuhide
Smegnet Corp
4011
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:So youre saying we should remove CONCORD.
agreed.
That would be a quick way to completely kill this game. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
1994
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
OP is pretty much spot-on.
I know who you're batting for now, Tarawa. I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:
https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted |

Yokai Mitsuhide
Smegnet Corp
4011
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
Malak Dawnfire wrote:Maybe if High sec wasn't so safe, Low sec might actually be a viable place to travel instead of the instant death near empire camps. 
Why does everyone think High Sec some kind of safe zone? I see miners getting ganked all the time, and plenty of high sec wars. Mission runners getting ninja looted and or baited into pvp, suicide ganked freighters. High sec isn't as safe as people who don't live here make it out to be.
|

Hessian Arcturus
S.W.O.R.D. Navy
83
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Low: No one mines, and odds are, that ratter is really bait.
Wrong... I have an alt that mines in a lovely little pocket of back end lowsec systems. People hardly ever come and go as its a dead end system with around 12 belts... It even has (until the next expantion) a lovely ice belt three jumps over.
Ive been there for months, gotten friendly with the 7 or 8 corps that are out there and I'm blue to them. On the off chance a neut does come into system, the corps in the area take care of it, and one of them even sits with me chatting to take care of any rats.
I have been caught a few times by neuts, and it doesnt really bother me. Most of the time I have a laugh in local with them telling them to hurry up and blow my ship up because its taking them too long. Then I say gf and go about my business... One ship = about 200mill... I can make that back in pretty much no time at all...
EVE is a pvp game, and as a miner on my other account, I accept that... If you get blown up, its the person who gets blown up's fault. You didnt fight back/fit a tank/whatever. Same in consentual pvp ... If you get blown up, theres only one person to blame..yourself...
EDIT: This isnt a dig at anyone. It's just my two cents on the matter... It's human nature to want to explore. To find your line and go beyond it. The only limit, is the one you set yourself. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
1070
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:29:00 -
[9] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:I would rather lose 1 billion ISK in opportunity cost of not undocking rather than lose even a 50 million ISK ship. ****, and here I thought bears didn't care about their killboards... CCP has no sense of humour. |

Castor Narcissus
The Scope Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:38:00 -
[10] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Problem is, it is my experience, that this is NOT going to go away. ANY attempt to try to get us to accept a higher than "virtually 0" loss is simply going to result in us quitting the game. AND, based on my experience with high sec and null, and the % of players in each of these areas of space, and the play styles in each area, the carebears are a HUGE chunk of teh revenue stream.
What was the point of your post? To convince us and CCP that you should be virtually safe from harm, that any chance that increases the chance of you falling victim to a crime, will make a great % of the player base to quit the game?
I'm the first one to defend that High sec needs to exist in EVE, but people like you want to shape this game into some type of solo isk grinding simulator.
You should get your priorities straight. get a new hobbie or something, it's clear that this game isn't beneficial for you. |
|

Ari Laveran
L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION
22
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
I've been here under 3 months and the OP sounds incredibly boring. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
2765
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:46:00 -
[12] - Quote
Oh here we go again. |

floating in space
University of Caille Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
Being jealous of people with ISK is just as bad as hoarding it for no reason |

Kitty Bear
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Tribal Band
651
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:48:00 -
[14] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:If carebears were willing to lose a 200 million ISK ship, every time they mine 1 billion ISK in ore or grind up a billion ISK in mission rewards, I think the PvPers would not be so angry with them.
The simple truth is, I am not willing to accept even that level of loss. I would rather lose 1 billion ISK in opportunity cost of not undocking rather than lose even a 50 million ISK ship. I can grind up a billion ISK a week, and if I lose a ship every 3 months, it is too much for me. Way, way too much.
I've lost 0 ships in the last 9 months.... yeah, that's just about the right amount of loss.
And, the other carebears I've played the game with (100s), are pretty much in agreement that absolutely 0 loss is pretty much the correct amount.
I get it why the PvPers are so frustrated by us. I really do.
Problem is, it is my experience, that this is NOT going to go away. ANY attempt to try to get us to accept a higher than "virtually 0" loss is simply going to result in us quitting the game. AND, based on my experience with high sec and null, and the % of players in each of these areas of space, and the play styles in each area, the carebears are a HUGE chunk of teh revenue stream.
War Dec: Industry corp gets war decced. PvPers say, come out and fight. What actually happens? No one logs in, or if they do log in, they do not undock. The players drop to NPC corps, or spin up a temp corp and switch to that. Very, very few ships actually go boom becuase of high sec war dec vs. industry corp.
Low: No one mines, and odds are, that ratter is really bait.
Null cloaky camper: Dito the above industrial corp war dec. No one undocks.
Null roaming gang in the area, upto 3 jumps out? Everyone safe's up, and stays safed up for as long as it takes for the roaming gang to leave.
The simple reality is, the carebears/nullbears are NEVER going to accept even a 10-20% loss in ships as percent of value they mine. It is fundamentally against our nature to play a game where we are easy targets for PvPers.
Just a FYI ...
The [UNDOCK] button is a "I agree to be blown up" button by clicking it, you are accepting. |

Ryu Ibarazaki
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
70
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:50:00 -
[15] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote: I get it why the PvPers are so frustrated by us. I really do.
Problem is, it is my experience, that this is NOT going to go away. ANY attempt to try to get us to accept a higher than "virtually 0" loss is simply going to result in us quitting the game. AND, based on my experience with high sec and null, and the % of players in each of these areas of space, and the play styles in each area, the carebears are a HUGE chunk of teh revenue stream.
Just PvPers?
You come on and say it's my way or I quit. It's not just PvPers that will look at a statement like that and be unimpressed. Frankly I don't know why CCP would bother catering to a portion of their playerbase that is so quick to melodramatic gestures and complaining.
|

lanyaie
834
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:50:00 -
[16] - Quote
I agree, CCP Nerf nullsec Hay |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
203
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:51:00 -
[17] - Quote
OP needs to lose more ships. Once you realize a ship is no different than the ammo you load in your guns, EVE becomes much more fun.
Fit a frig, go jump into FW. Bounce into lowsec, find a dude, shoot them. EVE is PVP, and the sooner you add shiptoasting to your arsenal of weapons, the better. Don't worry miners, I'm here to help!
|

Dheeradj Nurgle
Hoover Inc. Test Alliance Please Ignore
373
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:56:00 -
[18] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote: War Dec: Industry corp gets war decced. PvPers say, come out and fight. What actually happens? No one logs in, or if they do log in, they do not undock. The players drop to NPC corps, or spin up a temp corp and switch to that. Very, very few ships actually go boom becuase of high sec war dec vs. industry corp.
Wait, Highsec griefing is considered PvP now? Did I miss that memo?
That is like saying Marmite Collective, or Whores In Space are PvPers instead of Griefers out for easy no-effort kills. |

Robus Muvila
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
292
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:56:00 -
[19] - Quote
Same Spiel same dance.
He does this all the time guys.
Don't feed the troll. TMC Senior Developer http://themittani.com - Because EvE has needed a proper news site for ages |

Setaceous
Nexus Prima
74
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 01:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
Massive generalisation based on personal experience and presented as a fact. This post confuses and sickens me. It's a misery wrapped in an enema. |
|

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
203
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 01:08:00 -
[21] - Quote
Setaceous wrote:Massive generalisation based on personal experience and presented as a fact. This post confuses and sickens me. It's a misery wrapped in an enema.
Enema or enigma?
I mean, both work, and considering the OP..... Don't worry miners, I'm here to help!
|

Setaceous
Nexus Prima
74
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 01:15:00 -
[22] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Setaceous wrote:Massive generalisation based on personal experience and presented as a fact. This post confuses and sickens me. It's a misery wrapped in an enema. Enema or enigma? I mean, both work, and considering the OP..... I know what I meant  |

Shamus O'Reilly
Gungnirs' Point I Know Right
115
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 01:20:00 -
[23] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote: Low: No one mines, and odds are, that ratter is really bait.
Not true. In fact not only are there miners in lowsec but there are actually corps that reside there and do indie all the time
They're just not the usual "scared to lose isk by dieing type" that hisec has and are down there because there is 2x to 3x the profit as there is in hisec "I swear there are more people complaining over "nullsecers complaining" then actual nullsec people complaining." |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
639
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 03:58:00 -
[24] - Quote
It takes money to make money, even in New Eden.
Tears included. From: Tommas De'Wins To: Cipher Jones Dude :) I got massives Basi hahahahahahaha |

Malak Dawnfire
The Scope Gallente Federation
123
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 04:03:00 -
[25] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:It takes money to make money, even in New Eden.
Tears included.
What's the exchange rate for tears? I have plenty of my own and wouldn't mind having a little more ISK!  |

Mayhaw Morgan
State War Academy Caldari State
80
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 04:07:00 -
[26] - Quote
Kitty Bear wrote:The [UNDOCK] button is a "I agree to be blown up" button by clicking it, you are accepting.
Having the right to do something and having the ability to do something are separate issues. I have the ability to go next door right now and burn my neighbors house down. That doesn't mean he consented to have his house burnt down.
LHA Tarawa wrote:The fight between PvPers and carebears really is the carebears' fault.
I disagree. I think it's perfectly reasonable to not want to be someone else's toy. I think if "PVPers" were really that, they would hop in a mining barge and out-mine the miner, or hop in a mission boat and out-mission the missioner, or hop in a freighter and out-haul the space trucker. And, to be fair, I have seen plenty of players put themselves into a real contest against a worthy opponent, but that's not what we're talking about here.
I think what a lot of the supposed PVPers really want is not any sort of test of their own merit against their fellow man, but rather, they want . . . to play God. They want to exercise power. They want to exert control. This is an MMORPG, after all, and a very special one at that. In many other MMORPGs, you can be on relatively equal footing with just about any other player after a month or two of grinding. In EVE, the imbalance tends to remain fairly static. A miner will probably never be able to go toe-to-toe with a strictly combat focused character. So, to ask that a miner or hauler or trader undock a ship and do combat against such an opponent is basically asking that miner, hauler, trader, etc. to be the other player's toy. To ask the miner or hauler or trader to focus on combat skills is asking them to do something that may not be fun to them. Then, what is left besides abstinence from PVP?
It should be no surprise that people don't readily volunteer to be the mouse in a game of cat-and-mouse. |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
610
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 04:21:00 -
[27] - Quote
... votes "Oui" for "Armageddon Day: Redux"... and let it last a week this time. 
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7856
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 05:14:00 -
[28] - Quote
You're not expected to accept x losses per x gains, you're expected to accept the possibility of a loss, period. It's not something you can put in a spreadsheet like every other part of the game, it's just something you accept as a reality of the game.
It's this thing that the wretches cannot accept, and they demand changes that give them perfect safety and allow them to play in their own little bubble, generating massive amounts of ISK to cash out with.
EVE isn't a hellish fragfest like Darkfall and it shouldn't be, but it also shouldn't be Friendship is Magic: Space Adventures. If you can't accept the possibility that somebody somewhere might consider you a target, you're playing the wrong game. mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
2765
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 05:21:00 -
[29] - Quote
Andski wrote:You're not expected to accept x losses per x gains, you're expected to accept the possibility of a loss, period. It's not something you can put in a spreadsheet like every other part of the game, it's just something you accept as a reality of the game.
It's this thing that the wretches cannot accept, and they demand changes that give them perfect safety and allow them to play in their own little bubble, generating massive amounts of ISK to cash out with.
EVE isn't a hellish fragfest like Darkfall and it shouldn't be, but it also shouldn't be Friendship is Magic: Space Adventures. If you can't accept the possibility that somebody somewhere might consider you a target, you're playing the wrong game.
"Possibility of a loss".
Key words there.
How much possibility is there compared to inevitability.
But we can put aside stats and mechanics (get rid of the spreadsheet) and we have to deal with the truth versus perception.
As soon as everybody stops arguing about the truth, as if winning will change it, and starts working to change the perception (a greater possibility) this whole high sec thing is not going to end.
|

pussnheels
The Fiction Factory
1188
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 05:25:00 -
[30] - Quote
What fight there is no fight only thing i see is alot of whinning on the forums demanding that CCP changes this or that game mechanic so they can kill thir targets easier or that they are better defended against ganks or demanding that any other playstyle except their own is banned and these come from both sides I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |