| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1299
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 02:30:00 -
[241] - Quote
Klymer wrote:I hate to say it, but wormholes look a helluva lot like nullsec. You have c1-4 holes that are for the most part worthless, similar to losec and a lot of nullsec. You then have c5-6 holes that are like the lower end of the truesec spectrum of null systems. This is especially true from a defensive and monetary standpoint when you consider the deadend null systems that have low truesec, have been fully upgraded and cyno jammed so that the capital ships in them can gorge themselves on pve content in relative safety.
Worthless huh?
Well, can't argue with you on the C5/6 system. But then look who is in them...a lot of nullsec'rs. It's not surprising that many of the suggestions in this thread were null-centric. They're crying that they're not getting enough pew. But when I compared Bitten with a total of +3000 kills on eve-kill and +200 pilots with my corp having +700 kills and having 17 toons (mostly alts) we're getting over twice the pew per pilot......so yeah, I live in worthless space. Should I be the one that's crying? Or should those c5/6 guys realize that pew in w-space revolves around small gangs....not large fleets. While they're spectacular when they fight similarly capable fleet, in w-space, those are hard to find.
If effort is cumulative then Bitten should be far far outpacing my corp's per pilot numbers. But, they're not...instead we're far far outpacing them with kills/pilot. It means they've surpassed the point of diminishing returns by a long shot...as far as w-space is concerned. Instead of realizing the realities we'll get to listen to them moan about how w-space is broken because they've chosen to play in a null-centric fashion....blobs + caps....I assume so they can maximize their win potential. But it doesn't maximize their pew potential which is what they say they want......certainly they can't have both...imo. There's a reason in nature why smaller more generalized organisms are more successful over all than specialized megafauna.
And by the way...what's worthless? I make 200mil/hr running my c4 static....400mil/hr when its just me and my alt. It's made me very comfortable. I don't want for isk. And I get plenty of pew. Can't always find it when I'm looking for it and some times there just aren't enough hours in a day for all of it. Sure, it's not c5/6 income but then I'm here for it all.....not cap fights/blob fests and don't have +50 people crammed into a single hole that all need to be fed.
The only thing we're lacking that c5/6 guys have are the caps and large numbers of players. I firmly believe it's their numbers, the blob style of fighting that is the crux of their pew problems because w-space will only support limited blob/cap fights.
HTFU!...for the children! |

Messoroz
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 02:59:00 -
[242] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:i see a super blob vs super blob gank in nullsec. grats? i guess. not related to WHs in the slightest.
WORMHOLES WERE USED. |

Joan Greywind
Temnava Legion No Holes Barred
46
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 03:12:00 -
[243] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:VegasMirage wrote:so, this is where all the super bads talk about important stuff This is where all the superbads complain they don't have enough pew and make suggestions to change a perfectly acceptable and fun part of space into blobfests. Apparently, fun should have nothing to do with pvp....and pvp should require +30 man fleets to be successful.
Mr kidd Please stop warping the topic to fit your warped biased view about wormhole space, you are even worse than fox news. Your hatred towards c5/c6 entities is just blinding you. I have said it personally more than 10 times, that I don't want WH space to be like null. I also said that we don't want to pvp stop being fun (no one really is arguing for the change of pvp mechanics), also mentioned more than 10 times. We do have the most fun form of pvp in wormhole space. All I said that maybe there should be in game mechanics to drive it. I also said multiple times that we do get plenty of pvp in wormhole space, but there is no reason not to want more.
So please stop this charade and if you hate c5/c6's entities just go kill them, no reason to spew your garbage on the forums.
And Mr kid sometimes the quality of the kills is more important than the quantity. I believe "gevlon" (a miner ganker with a blog), killed like 52b worth of minning in high sec solo in a given month. And it would really help your claim if we actually had your corps name, or maybe the gallante federation decided to venture in to wh space??? |

Winthorp
Van Diemen's Demise
143
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 03:29:00 -
[244] - Quote
Joan Greywind wrote: no reason to spew your garbage on the forums.
Ohh the irony.
|

Jack Miton
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
2112
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 04:28:00 -
[245] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:Joan Greywind wrote: no reason to spew your garbage on the forums. Ohh the irony. HA! beat me to it ;) |

ROSSLINDEN0
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
111
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 05:05:00 -
[246] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:i see a super blob vs super blob gank in nullsec. grats? i guess. not related to WHs in the slightest.
wtf are you looking at |

Robert Saint
Playright
79
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 05:20:00 -
[247] - Quote
So here is the thoughts of one who has nothing to do with W-Space, since I've never been there, but would like to go!
Fix it yourself...... CCP should do nothing!!!
That seems to be the popular thought in here whenever someone tries to make any constructive comments to the forum group about PVP changes.
Why in the world would anyone besides existing and bored WH PVPers want to make W-space more difficult to venture into.
Please
|

Rengas
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
187
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 05:47:00 -
[248] - Quote
One of those poor aeon pilots had actually been in NoHo.
Two days in PL and he gets to take part in the biggest awox in EVE history  |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Polarized.
768
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 06:45:00 -
[249] - Quote
Confirming that killing supers in null drives conflict in wormhole space.
What now? |

Messoroz
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 07:06:00 -
[250] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Confirming that killing supers in null drives conflict in wormhole space.
Actually...I just remembered.
All the isk from our roams goes to the corp.
With the corp isk at one point we supplied hundreds of ships to corp members for free and fully fitted. To go pew in wspace and null.
So yes, killing supers in null drives conflict in wspace.
Them free ships gotta be paid for somehow!
I think at one point(when we cared), we were raking in so much isk off the modules of dead scrubs in null, we could buy an armour fleet fives times over a week. |

Winthorp
Van Diemen's Demise
143
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 07:23:00 -
[251] - Quote
Messoroz wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Confirming that killing supers in null drives conflict in wormhole space.
Actually...I just remembered. All the isk from our roams goes to the corp. With the corp isk at one point we supplied hundreds of ships to corp members for free and fully fitted. To go pew in wspace and null. So yes, killing supers in null drives conflict in wspace. Them free ships gotta be paid for somehow! I think at one point(when we cared), we were raking in so much isk off the modules of dead scrubs in null, we could buy an armour fleet fives times over a week.
Not to mention you farm in WH space and play ONLY in low and null so how are you any better then all the null WH farm corps? Just because you bear in WH space doesn't make you at all relevant to WH space.
The days the VOC are relevant in WH's are gone so blue ball WH some more and take your posting over to Kugu. |

Messoroz
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 07:26:00 -
[252] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:Messoroz wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Confirming that killing supers in null drives conflict in wormhole space.
Actually...I just remembered. All the isk from our roams goes to the corp. With the corp isk at one point we supplied hundreds of ships to corp members for free and fully fitted. To go pew in wspace and null. So yes, killing supers in null drives conflict in wspace. Them free ships gotta be paid for somehow! I think at one point(when we cared), we were raking in so much isk off the modules of dead scrubs in null, we could buy an armour fleet fives times over a week. Not to mention you farm in WH space and play ONLY in low and null so how are you any better then all the null WH farm corps? Just because you bear in WH space doesn't make you at all relevant to WH space. The days the VOC are relevant in WH's are gone so blue ball WH some more and take your posting over to Kugu.
"play" only in low and null?
We do play in wspace in small skirmishes and we all fully live out of wspace.
Sorry we don't want to wait the 2 hours to engage the same boring armor fleet, consisting of the same exact ships and fits for the 300th fudging time. |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
2206
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 07:35:00 -
[253] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:Messoroz wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Confirming that killing supers in null drives conflict in wormhole space.
Actually...I just remembered. All the isk from our roams goes to the corp. With the corp isk at one point we supplied hundreds of ships to corp members for free and fully fitted. To go pew in wspace and null. So yes, killing supers in null drives conflict in wspace. Them free ships gotta be paid for somehow! I think at one point(when we cared), we were raking in so much isk off the modules of dead scrubs in null, we could buy an armour fleet fives times over a week. Not to mention you farm in WH space and play ONLY in low and null so how are you any better then all the null WH farm corps? Just because you bear in WH space doesn't make you at all relevant to WH space. The days the VOC are relevant in WH's are gone so blue ball WH some more and take your posting over to Kugu.
Grath, is that you?
Allow me to be frank. You will not like me. You will not like me now, and you will not like men++ a good deal less as we go on. |

Winthorp
Van Diemen's Demise
143
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 07:41:00 -
[254] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:Winthorp wrote:Messoroz wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Confirming that killing supers in null drives conflict in wormhole space.
Actually...I just remembered. All the isk from our roams goes to the corp. With the corp isk at one point we supplied hundreds of ships to corp members for free and fully fitted. To go pew in wspace and null. So yes, killing supers in null drives conflict in wspace. Them free ships gotta be paid for somehow! I think at one point(when we cared), we were raking in so much isk off the modules of dead scrubs in null, we could buy an armour fleet fives times over a week. Not to mention you farm in WH space and play ONLY in low and null so how are you any better then all the null WH farm corps? Just because you bear in WH space doesn't make you at all relevant to WH space. The days the VOC are relevant in WH's are gone so blue ball WH some more and take your posting over to Kugu. Grath, is that you?
LOL no but for the other kids here is Grath that VOC upset https://soundcloud.com/jwstew007/mumble-07-07-21-15-49-mumble that guy is super mad. |

Messoroz
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 07:45:00 -
[255] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:Alpheias wrote:Winthorp wrote:Messoroz wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Confirming that killing supers in null drives conflict in wormhole space.
Actually...I just remembered. All the isk from our roams goes to the corp. With the corp isk at one point we supplied hundreds of ships to corp members for free and fully fitted. To go pew in wspace and null. So yes, killing supers in null drives conflict in wspace. Them free ships gotta be paid for somehow! I think at one point(when we cared), we were raking in so much isk off the modules of dead scrubs in null, we could buy an armour fleet fives times over a week. Not to mention you farm in WH space and play ONLY in low and null so how are you any better then all the null WH farm corps? Just because you bear in WH space doesn't make you at all relevant to WH space. The days the VOC are relevant in WH's are gone so blue ball WH some more and take your posting over to Kugu. Grath, is that you? LOL no but for the other kids here is Grath that VOC upset https://soundcloud.com/jwstew007/mumble-07-07-21-15-49-mumble that guy is super mad.
Wrong link LOL |

Winthorp
Van Diemen's Demise
143
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 07:59:00 -
[256] - Quote
Messoroz wrote:
Wrong link LOL
HAHA i see the poster of that recording has edited it all out but that is the original link that i have in my browser paused with the Grath rage.
|

Messoroz
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:02:00 -
[257] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:Messoroz wrote:
Wrong link LOL
HAHA i see the poster of that recording has edited it all out but that is the original link that i have in my browser paused with the Grath rage.
https://soundcloud.com/nan-6/grath-rage-07-07-2013
Ninja saved. |

Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:03:00 -
[258] - Quote
Messoroz wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Confirming that killing supers in null drives conflict in wormhole space.
Actually...I just remembered. All the isk from our roams goes to the corp. With the corp isk at one point we supplied hundreds of ships to corp members for free and fully fitted. To go pew in wspace and null. So yes, killing supers in null drives conflict in wspace. Them free ships gotta be paid for somehow! I think at one point(when we cared), we were raking in so much isk off the modules of dead scrubs in null, we could buy an armour fleet fives times over a week.
Not really. The isk you get from your null sec roams came from killing null bears which doesn't effect wormholes and as you don't pvp exclusively in wormholes, you are not investing that isk in WH pvp.
I'm not saying looking for pvp in null is bad but it does little to create pvp opertunities in wormholes. |

Messoroz
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:06:00 -
[259] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:Messoroz wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Confirming that killing supers in null drives conflict in wormhole space.
Actually...I just remembered. All the isk from our roams goes to the corp. With the corp isk at one point we supplied hundreds of ships to corp members for free and fully fitted. To go pew in wspace and null. So yes, killing supers in null drives conflict in wspace. Them free ships gotta be paid for somehow! I think at one point(when we cared), we were raking in so much isk off the modules of dead scrubs in null, we could buy an armour fleet fives times over a week. No really. The isk you get from your null sec roams came from killing null bears which doesn't effect wormholes and as you don't pvp exclusively in wormholes, you are not investing that isk in WH pvp. I'm not saying looking for pvp in null is bad but it does little to create pvp opertunities in wormholes.
There's little PVP opportunities in highsec.
Why should CCP add more to wspace?
|

Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:11:00 -
[260] - Quote
That makes no sense... What are you asking?
Also, there are plenty of pvp opertunities in HS. Don't feel bad, sometimes wormholes forget wardecs are a thing. |

Messoroz
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
407
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:14:00 -
[261] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:That makes no sense... What are you asking?
Also, there are plenty of pvp opertunities in HS. Don't feel bad, sometimes wormholes forget wardecs are a thing.
Actually wardecs have a wspace equivalent.
It's called,
Aggressors warp aarmor blob to a hole. Defenders sit in POS for the next week. |

Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:23:00 -
[262] - Quote
Huh?
I don't understand what point you are trying to make. Maybe you misread my post? Give it a second read mate. There is no need for a quick reply either, give yourself some time to think first. |

MadbaM
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
41
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:38:00 -
[263] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:Huh?
I don't understand what point you are trying to make. Maybe you misread my post? Give it a second read mate. There is no need for a quick reply either, give yourself some time to think first.
if i'm not mistaken he was making light of the fact that high sec war dec's provide as much meaningful PVP as your average slumber party pillow fight.
i think it is you sir that needs to read posts twice.
And i think this thread has come full circle back onto one of the first posts made, if you want PVP in WH's so badly go get in a ship scan a WH and look for it. If you CBA scanning or siting of a POS cloaked for that guy to go do PI then go to low or null instead of heading to the forum.
And if you keep crying about it so much eventually someone will deliver it to your front door, and you might not like it so much. |

Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:45:00 -
[264] - Quote
I'm sorry, are we talking about something other than the thread title now? What has HS got to do with increasing conflict between wormhole entities.
This thread and the idiots in it (maybe myself included) are the biggest wormhole conflict driver at the moment. 
Edit: ah you edited on me... Yeah maybe you are right. Perhaps C6 wormhole pvp should just be about killing PI alts and killing supers in null. |

Joan Greywind
Temnava Legion No Holes Barred
46
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 09:35:00 -
[265] - Quote
MadbaM wrote:[quote=Quinn Corvez]Huh?
And if you keep crying about it so much eventually someone will deliver it to your front door, and you might not like it so much.
I always like pvp, even when im losing, I welcome your blob. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1301
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 13:52:00 -
[266] - Quote
Joan Greywind wrote:Mr Kidd wrote:VegasMirage wrote:so, this is where all the super bads talk about important stuff This is where all the superbads complain they don't have enough pew and make suggestions to change a perfectly acceptable and fun part of space into blobfests. Apparently, fun should have nothing to do with pvp....and pvp should require +30 man fleets to be successful. Mr kidd Please stop warping the topic to fit your warped biased view about wormhole space, you are even worse than fox news. Your hatred towards c5/c6 entities is just blinding you. I have said it personally more than 10 times, that I don't want WH space to be like null. I also said that we don't want to pvp stop being fun (no one really is arguing for the change of pvp mechanics), also mentioned more than 10 times. We do have the most fun form of pvp in wormhole space. All I said that maybe there should be in game mechanics to drive it. I also said multiple times that we do get plenty of pvp in wormhole space, but there is no reason not to want more. So please stop this charade and if you hate c5/c6's entities just go kill them, no reason to spew your garbage on the forums. And Mr kid sometimes the quality of the kills is more important than the quantity. I believe "gevlon" (a miner ganker with a blog), killed like 52b worth of minning in high sec solo in a given month. And it would really help your claim if we actually had your corps name, or maybe the gallante federation decided to venture in to wh space???
Joan, I have no hatred of C5/6 dwellers. My corp will invite them when we have something too big to kill and go join them when invited to tag along. We have open invitations to several of the large w-space inhabitants because we're effective pvp'rs for our size and get them juicy kills when they have nothing else to do.
We have friends all over c5/6 space. Hell, even use to be temnava before you guys imploded and our friends left you for greener pastures.
As for the quality of our kills.....they're all w-space, and since we're too small to pos bash, you can rule that out. Do we gank miners, harvesters, farmers.....you betcha. Just like everyone else here. We'll take on larger fleets and still come out on top, most occasions.
And you'll never know who I am. You'll either have to accept it or bask in your own satisfaction of denial because it could never be true. I'm not here for pats on the back and attaboys. I'm here to enjoy the game for what it is in w-space.....not play it wrong and ask CCP to break it.....I mean fix it.
Everything I've said in this thread is true from my perspective. The big guys want more and bigger fights. Without CCP, that's not possible. But what you're asking for is to fix w-space into something it's not, nor should it be. As for their efficacy at fighting.....I'm not convinced they are that effective when my small corp punches a Kill It With Fire T3 in the face in their home system and they drop a carrier to fend us off....fight over...yeah? Did they want pew or just a win? They lost both. Because we left and they never got a kill on us. We came into them from a C4 so there was not way they could have believed we would have cap support. HTFU!...for the children! |

Archdaimon
NorCorp Enterprise No Holes Barred
200
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 14:07:00 -
[267] - Quote
The above post is far more chill so it actually makes sense to respond to it.
What made you trigger is that you see conflict drivers the same as breaking W-space. I don't think anyone living in w-space wants it to change in any greater way and especially not to become more like k-space. Else odds are we would live there.
However, adding content, creating content does not equal that. And when a thread like this devolves into "c6's only wants blob" any chance of actually figuring out what could be improved, without changing the overall feel of WH, disapears.
While I get that the hunt in itself is brilliant and something which is quite rewarding in iteself (far more so than any where else in eve because of cloak-no-local) it does not change the fact the besides the hunt it tends to become arena pvp.
Whether there is a way to change this, without adding to "the blob, blue donought, chose what ever word you want" I don't know. But discussing it has merit - something which unreflected rage has completely made impossible in this thread, even to a degree where other threads are being jacked off through this thread a weird distaste for higher class wormhole dwellers.
More non-static wormholes would be brilliant. But is it a conflict driver in itself? Dunno. Is there a way to motivate for invations without just adding more blobs? Dunno.
But through 14 pages no one ever tried to actually answer the question nor dare reflect on it without spewing bile. Wormholes have the best accoustics. It's known. - Sing it for me - |

Sandslinger
NorCorp Enterprise No Holes Barred
90
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 14:53:00 -
[268] - Quote
Archdaimon wrote:The above post is far more chill so it actually makes sense to respond to it.
What made you trigger is that you see conflict drivers the same as breaking W-space. I don't think anyone living in w-space wants it to change in any greater way and especially not to become more like k-space. Else odds are we would live there.
However, adding content, creating content does not equal that. And when a thread like this devolves into "c6's only wants blob" any chance of actually figuring out what could be improved, without changing the overall feel of WH, disapears.
While I get that the hunt in itself is brilliant and something which is quite rewarding in iteself (far more so than any where else in eve because of cloak-no-local) it does not change the fact the besides the hunt it tends to become arena pvp.
Whether there is a way to change this, without adding to "the blob, blue donought, chose what ever word you want" I don't know. But discussing it has merit - something which unreflected rage has completely made impossible in this thread, even to a degree where other threads are being jacked off through this thread a weird distaste for higher class wormhole dwellers.
More non-static wormholes would be brilliant. But is it a conflict driver in itself? Dunno. Is there a way to motivate for invations without just adding more blobs? Dunno.
But through 14 pages no one ever tried to actually answer the question nor dare reflect on it without spewing bile.
G¥ñ |

Darren Fox
NorCorp Enterprise No Holes Barred
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 15:27:00 -
[269] - Quote
First, I want more conflict drivers in w-space!
In w-space we don't have to fight for our pve. There is more than enough to farm for everyone, either in your home system, chain or alt corp. Also, there are enough systems for everyone. Evictions are usually for meta reasons, not profit or because the invader wants the system for their own.
In order for the existing content to be a conflict driver you either need fewer w-space systems, less anoms/sigs or more people in w-space.
I like the suggestion of a Class 7 wh with roaming C5/C6 wormholes and no moons. Ideally they have something which will be rare and in short supply. Maybe they could drop T2 BPC Capital guns, or T3 Frigate/BS BPC in addition to high value blue loot. That would be a sufficient conflict driver because everyone will want to acquire it, and they will always be vulnerable. In order for it not to be easy to control the C7, the mass of the wormholes could be similar to that of a C1. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1302
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 16:01:00 -
[270] - Quote
Darren Fox wrote:First, I want more conflict drivers in w-space!
In w-space we don't have to fight for our pve. There is more than enough to farm for everyone, either in your home system, chain or alt corp. Also, there are enough systems for everyone. Evictions are usually for meta reasons, not profit or because the invader wants the system for their own.
In order for the existing content to be a conflict driver you either need fewer w-space systems, less anoms/sigs or more people in w-space.
I like the suggestion of a Class 7 wh with roaming C5/C6 wormholes and no moons. Ideally they have something which will be rare and in short supply. Maybe they could drop T2 BPC Capital guns, or T3 Frigate/BS BPC in addition to high value blue loot. That would be a sufficient conflict driver because everyone will want to acquire it, and they will always be vulnerable. In order for it not to be easy to control the C7, the mass of the wormholes could be similar to that of a C1.
Archdaimon, point taken.
Darren, the "no pew to pve" statement is directly caused by you guys moving into the least populated areas of space. In lower classes where almost every other wh is occupied, we do. Being connected to a hs means anyone can come into our system, probe our static and attempt to ruin our day. It's the difference between living in the country (you guys) expecting to go night club hopping every night of the week or living in more populated areas to do it.
Null has maturated....for the past 10 years. W-space, only...what...4 years old. You guys can fix your own issue, but you're not gong to like how to do it.....stop evicting people....let them grow...in the mean time you can still pew with them. If I blew up my neighbors everytime I saw them....I wouldn't have any. I know I know....it's an inane argument.....but there is truth to it. You guys have just grown too fast for the area you're in. It's probably a quicker and less completely fcked up way to fix your issues than asking devs who barely play the game to fix it for you. It's like asking your government to get involved in a family dispute.....restraining orders, someone's going to jail.....everyone is going to be broke. HTFU!...for the children! |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |