Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Skaz
Skazmanian Industries
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 13:35:00 -
[181] - Quote
Forcing people to join corps after a set amount of time is a game breaker.
Ruins the sandbox. |

March rabbit
Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 13:41:00 -
[182] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:I made a really dumb post the other day. ... I make this post in an attempt to counter the problem with some thought rather then belligerence. ... Discuss.... i think you should spend a little more time to cook your idea.... Didn't read your prev post (you already said it's dumb so there is no problem here). But this one.... You started from miners and suicide gankings and finished by mission runners and "nerf them all".....
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
845
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 13:50:00 -
[183] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:I say keep the ganking of hulks in hisec up. Eventually you'll either end up with no more targets to shoot, or no more game to play.
It's literally impossible to get minerals from anywhere except hi-sec.
True story! Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Tanya Fox
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 13:54:00 -
[184] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:I say keep the ganking of hulks in hisec up. Eventually you'll either end up with no more targets to shoot, or no more game to play. It's literally impossible to get minerals from anywhere except hi-sec. True story!
Don't know what it's like in 0.0 now, but the mineral prices used to be lower there compared to high-sec.. |

Helicity Boson
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 13:58:00 -
[185] - Quote
Tanya Fox wrote:Malcanis wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:I say keep the ganking of hulks in hisec up. Eventually you'll either end up with no more targets to shoot, or no more game to play. It's literally impossible to get minerals from anywhere except hi-sec. True story! Don't know what it's like in 0.0 now, but the mineral prices used to be lower there compared to high-sec..
Basically, you literally have no idea what you're talking about. Thus I would suggest you stop doing it. Talking that is. |

Tanya Fox
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 14:03:00 -
[186] - Quote
Helicity Boson wrote:Tanya Fox wrote:Malcanis wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:I say keep the ganking of hulks in hisec up. Eventually you'll either end up with no more targets to shoot, or no more game to play. It's literally impossible to get minerals from anywhere except hi-sec. True story! Don't know what it's like in 0.0 now, but the mineral prices used to be lower there compared to high-sec.. Basically, you literally have no idea what you're talking about. Thus I would suggest you stop doing it. Talking that is.
Lol, I was talking from personal experience, but I suspect it's regional, just depends where and when. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
1034
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 14:18:00 -
[187] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Mag's wrote:That was quite a long winded why of saying, "I have no answer".
You didn't get the hint? It was actually a polite way of telling you to stfu. You're boring. I don't mind that you cannot answer the question, but it does reflect poorly upon your argument. 
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1314
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 14:58:00 -
[188] - Quote
Tanya Fox wrote: Don't know what it's like in 0.0 now, but the mineral prices used to be lower there compared to high-sec..
no they didn't, for anything except pyerite |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1314
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 15:02:00 -
[189] - Quote
and that's because compressed minerals tend to contain too much of it and its a pain to re-export |

Tanya Fox
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 16:12:00 -
[190] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Tanya Fox wrote: Don't know what it's like in 0.0 now, but the mineral prices used to be lower there compared to high-sec..
no they didn't, for anything except pyerite
So what you are saying is that no other mineral other than Pyrite has ever been lower in price than the high-sec mineral at any time in 0.0.
Well I know that's not the case. |

March rabbit
Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 16:12:00 -
[191] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote:The great unsaid here....why not find other PvP-ers and shoot your hearts out (literally)? You shoot. They shoot. You shoot...
Why drag the entire EVE population into some psychopathic hunger for chaos? Why can't the ones who like to do it, do it. The ones who aren't interested as their interests lie elsewhere NOT do it?
The great unsaid...honestly answer that. Why?
maybe those "pvpers" don't want pvp? Maybe they only want "tears"?
Like USA: never aggroed strong opponent but spending years in wars with small and weak ones for "good for us all"  |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
117

|
Posted - 2011.10.27 16:28:00 -
[192] - Quote
Moved from General Discussions and off topic posts removed. Please stay on topic, thank you. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

David Cedarbridge
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
120
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 17:32:00 -
[193] - Quote
The Apostle wrote: See any major alliances fighting lately? Nope. They're in highsec beating up miners making less than 3m an hour.
Actually, the ice miner shooting is a side project. Though your rage about this is fairly amusing. Feel free to visit Delve if you're looking for pvp. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
717
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 21:10:00 -
[194] - Quote
David Cedarbridge wrote:The Apostle wrote: See any major alliances fighting lately? Nope. They're in highsec beating up miners making less than 3m an hour.
Actually, the ice miner shooting is a side project. Though your rage about this is fairly amusing. Feel free to visit Delve if you're looking for pvp. Now here's the thing. I used to live in CFCville. I understood the risks, I took the neccessary precautions. I reaped the benefits of the risks. I did big ops, I did roams. I fought people who also wanted to fight. It was a target rich environment. (I even flew with G**ns - VFK, I was there!)
And get this. It didn't even occur to me to go find a Hulk and kill it. Why would you? What glory, what honour can be found in killing a mining vessel when I could hunt a T3 cruiser for 2 hours and kill it?
The point of my story.... My work got busy, I left 0.0. (I had other motivations too but RL was primary)
Any 0.0 dude will tell you, as soon as you fly into highsec there are "neuts" everywhere, all flying around, unprotected, unescorted. It took me a few days just to get in the habit of NOT locking and trying to engage every neut I saw.
And they can fly around like this all day, mostly unmolested. wtf you ask? How? Concord. I couldn't shoot without a loss.
But then the other bit dawned on me. I could also fly around without my scout. I didn't need to sit after every jump, cloaked up, eyes peeled on overview / local / d-scan. I could actually relax.
So after months of puckered anal glands, jangling nerves, lightening fast reflexes poised over warp, lock, F1, F2, I was able to fly "normally". I could start to enjoy my surrounds. I had time to chat. I had time to chill.
So I took up missioning. I don't even bother worrying about threats unless local spiked by >5. Threats? What threats? Made some coin, work got busier.
So I bought a Hulk just to keep playing while I worked (from home). And until I sold it, mining in high-sec gave me puckered anal glands, jangling nerves and lightening fast reflexes poised over warp!!!
I can't be ****** anymore. I'm a miner and I gotta play like I'm in 0.0? May as well be in 0.0!!!
But who wants to be a drone working FOR someone when I could just as easily work for ME. But then some drones working FOR someone have decided that I shouldn't be allowed to work for ME either.
And nobody questions, ingame or Eve-O, who the **** are they to tell me what I can/cannot do?? I don't need isk, I don't care about isk. I just wanna be able to log and grab a few rocks so I can build an occasional ship, buy a plex and pay for my subs. I don't wanna sit, ignoring everything else around me just so I got my finger on warp, d-scan, whatever.
Been there did that.
I AM JUST A ******* MINER.
Like I said, I can''t be ****** anymore. And I bet I'm not alone. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
67
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 21:51:00 -
[195] - Quote
What the hell is a G**n anyway?
is Goon profanity now?
Also, I fail to see the point of your little story there. |

David Cedarbridge
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
120
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 03:47:00 -
[196] - Quote
The Apostle wrote::words:
God, look how mad this kid is.
I'm nobody's drone. If you flew in the CFC and only knew how to function as a "drone" and act when told to then you wasted your time in 0.0.
Also, lol@you thinking the game owes you a means of making isk through afk mining.
Deal with it. |

Integra Arkanheld
Andorra Paradis Fiscal
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 15:18:00 -
[197] - Quote
It is true that suicide ganking is a problem. It will even be a bigger problem with the 4 new BC in winter. Mining barged were supposed to be used in empire with low defenses, while the "strong" exumers should be used in low sec, 0.0 The exumers are easily killed in empire, and the game is becoming more PVP with time. To all those people that like so much to kill miners, I would say to leave empire space. That is what CCP wanted. If the game continues like that, there will be less new players that will stay. I had a couple of friends be suicided ganked in empire, and they left the game. They changed to another game. You might think it is funny, but in EVE, were industry is run by players, if there are less industrial players involved, the game will face serious troubles. If players can come to EVE, stay some time in empire, learning about the game, and playing casually against the machine, they will, with time, when they feel ready, go to low sec, 0.0. There are also casual players that stay always in empire that are needed to make the market active. Not allowing those players to play, is damaging EVE. PVP players have low sec, 0.0, and WARs (that need some fixes) to do PVP, I think that noobs, carebears also need to have a possibility to play. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1044
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 15:44:00 -
[198] - Quote
Integra Arkanheld wrote:It is true that suicide ganking is a problem. How so? In what way is it a problem?
Quote:If the game continues like that, there will be less new players that will stay. The problem with this assertion is that it is trivially disproven by reality. The game has been like that for the last eight years, and the only thing that has lowered the number of players is when CCP has put the game on the back-burner. In fact, if you want to go into dubious correlation/causation territory like that, the game actually started to lose steam around the time suicide ganking got its last negative adjustmentGǪ
Quote:You might think it is funny, but in EVE, were industry is run by players, if there are less industrial players involved, the game will face serious troubles. No, for the exact same reason: if there are less industrial players, then the prices will go up, which will increase the profitability of engaging in industry which will make more players do it.
Quote:If players can come to EVE, stay some time in empire, learning about the game, and playing casually against the machine, they will, with time, when they feel ready, go to low sec, 0.0. A couple of problems here. Empire space is not about GÇ£learning the gameGÇ¥ GÇö we have newbie systems for that, and they already offer increased protection. Empire space is actually a rather nasty place (in some parts of it, you'll get blown up on principle, because it's just that kind of system). And finally, empire does not, and never has let you GÇ£play casually against the machineGÇ¥ for the simple reason that EVE does not support that. There is no machine to play against GÇö only other players.
It is entirely possible for newbies and carebears to play. They just need to understand what kind of game it is they're playing. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Integra Arkanheld
Andorra Paradis Fiscal
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 23:21:00 -
[199] - Quote
Suicide ganking is a problem:
Because it is unbalanced. Using a ship with a lot lower cost of a defenseless industrial to kill it, is unbalanced. The attacker should loose more.
Quote:The problem with this assertion is that it is trivially disproven by reality. The game has been like that for the last eight years, and the only thing that has lowered the number of players is when CCP has put the game on the back-burner. In fact, if you want to go into dubious correlation/causation territory like that, the game actually started to lose steam around the time suicide ganking got its last negative adjustmentGǪ I seriously doubt that, and it is up to CCP to decide that.
Quote:Quote:You might think it is funny, but in EVE, were industry is run by players, if there are less industrial players involved, the game will face serious troubles. No, for the exact same reason: if there are less industrial players, then the prices will go up, which will increase the profitability of engaging in industry which will make more players do it.
With few industrial players, the market can be easily manipulated, and will not be able to run normally like that.
Quote:Quote:If players can come to EVE, stay some time in empire, learning about the game, and playing casually against the machine, they will, with time, when they feel ready, go to low sec, 0.0. A couple of problems here. Empire space is not about GÇ£learning the gameGÇ¥ GÇö we have newbie systems for that, and they already offer increased protection. Empire space is actually a rather nasty place (in some parts of it, you'll get blown up on principle, because it's just that kind of system). And finally, empire does not, and never has let you GÇ£play casually against the machineGÇ¥ for the simple reason that EVE does not support that. There is no machine to play against GÇö only other players. It is entirely possible for newbies and carebears to play. They just need to understand what kind of game it is they're playing. [/quote] You play against the machine doing missions for example. Not everything must be with players. Many players also mine AFK, and it has been like this for a long time. And if having an insecure high security zone is fine, then they should simply remove it. They should decide if they want to have a secure zone, but make it secure, or simply remove it. |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
71
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 05:17:00 -
[200] - Quote
Integra Arkanheld wrote:. And if having an insecure high security zone is fine, then they should simply remove it. They should decide if they want to have a secure zone, but make it secure, or simply remove it.
Highsec was never intended to be safe or secure. It's safer, that's all you're going to get. |

Anti's Slave
We Build You Buy Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 02:25:00 -
[201] - Quote
Danika Princip wrote: Highsec was never intended to be safe or secure. It's safer, that's all you're going to get.
And with the ever releasing new ships and equips it is growing less safe.
Why do I want to watch my back 24/7? I don't have to do that irl, so why would I need to here? Games are intended to be fun and that fun can possibly be taken away by anyone. In most games ganking someone would be considered harassment. I'm not saying I can't handle the heat, but not everyone is about PvP. I've learned most people in this game don't want real PvP they just want to harass people because they get hard over it. It seems like some elements to the game are flawed. I mean a simple thing like hiring an NPC merc group to protect you while you mine would be a simple addition...
P.S. Yes, you can hire players to do this too. But, as I've learned in this game, you can't trust anyone. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1055
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 03:41:00 -
[202] - Quote
Integra Arkanheld wrote:Suicide ganking is a problem:
Because it is unbalanced. Using a ship with a lot lower cost of a defenseless industrial to kill it, is unbalanced. The attacker should loose more. That's not an imbalance GÇö quite the opposite. That's just the effect of not having the moronic GÇ£bigger is betterGÇ¥ kind of balancing that some other games are burdened with (largely because they are no so completely focused on PvP and thus don't have to ensure than even the big guys are threatened by the small guys). Instead, it's pretty much in line with the paper-scissors-rock kind of balncing EVE uses.
The reason those other ships can kill that industrial is because they're generic combat ships, and the industrial most emphatically is not. The reason the industrial ships cost a lot of money is because it's very good at what it does, unlike those combat ships. However, their generic combat ability is higher than that of an industrial ship that is specialised at a completely different task. This is no different from a bunch of cheap subcaps being able to kill a capital ship or T1 ships being able to outperform GÇö or at least go toe-to-toe with GÇö T2 ships. The ability to do this means it is balanced because no matter what you choose, you will always have some kind of huge and glaring weakness.
Quote:I seriously doubt that, and it is up to CCP to decide that. Sure, but if you want to look it up, browse through some older expansion release notes and compare them with the evolution of the EVE population.
Quote:With few industrial players, the market can be easily manipulated, and will not be able to run normally like that. GǪat which point, again, more people will step in to try to take advantage of the situation and make money from industry.
Quote:You play against the machine doing missions for example. GǪbut even when doing missions, they are interacting with everyone else in the game. It's just how the whole thing is wired together: it is quite literally impossible not to affect everyone around you.
Quote:And if having an insecure high security zone is fine, then they should simply remove it. They should decide if they want to have a secure zone, but make it secure, or simply remove it. They already have removed it. Highsec is not GÇ£secureGÇ¥ GÇö it's just more secure, relatively speaking, than the other areas. It's high-sec, not complete-sec, and it was never intended to be a secure zone where you were free of threats.
GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
784
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 04:04:00 -
[203] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Highsec is not GÇ£secureGÇ¥ GÇö it's just more secure, relatively speaking, than the other areas. It's high-sec, not complete-sec, and it was never intended to be a secure zone where you were free of threats.
And the status quo has to be maintained because............
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

David Cedarbridge
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
120
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 04:06:00 -
[204] - Quote
Anti's Slave wrote:Danika Princip wrote: Highsec was never intended to be safe or secure. It's safer, that's all you're going to get.
And with the ever releasing new ships and equips it is growing less safe. Why do I want to watch my back 24/7? I don't have to do that irl, so why would I need to here? Games are intended to be fun and that fun can possibly be taken away by anyone. In most games ganking someone would be considered harassment. I'm not saying I can't handle the heat, but not everyone is about PvP. I've learned most people in this game don't want real PvP they just want to harass people because they get hard over it. It seems like some elements to the game are flawed. I mean a simple thing like hiring an NPC merc group to protect you while you mine would be a simple addition... P.S. Yes, you can hire players to do this too. But, as I've learned in this game, you can't trust anyone.
I'm pretty sure you're playing the wrong game. This isn't "most games." Its intentionally different. If you're playing EVE you're playing a game "all about PVP" because that's what it is. A PVP game. There is not a single part of this game that is not open to PVP in one way or another. This is by design. If you want a game that does not require you to participate in PVP without "taking away (your) fun" I would suggest you find one of those games that fall into the "most" category and play there. EVE has not deviated from the mindset that the world is open to player choice since the start. By definition, the game has been full PVP 23/7 since inception. Why is this all the sudden a shock to people now? |

David Cedarbridge
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
120
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 04:07:00 -
[205] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Tippia wrote:Highsec is not GÇ£secureGÇ¥ GÇö it's just more secure, relatively speaking, than the other areas. It's high-sec, not complete-sec, and it was never intended to be a secure zone where you were free of threats.
And the status quo has to be maintained because............ Working as intended |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1055
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 04:41:00 -
[206] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:And the status quo has to be maintained because............ GǪthere is no reason to change it, for starters. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

draconothese
Independant Celestial Enterprises Pink Fluffy Pussycats
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 08:57:00 -
[207] - Quote
hey im a carebear also want to getinto pvp and i suport ganking its important it makes all those worthless minerals you mine day in and dayout worth a little bit more, and i also suport these new ships that will allow ganking in any sec status.
oh and by the way missions will get you a bigger hull in the long run mining is a dyeing thing well unless its for ice
|

cornholio508
Berserking Roid Beavers Damned Nation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 13:12:00 -
[208] - Quote
Suicide ganking is not a problem and never has been until you get ganked . You then find the guy legally kill him and get over it .
The only things i can agree on is that NPC pilots need restrictions placed on them and the war declaration system needs work .
So here is my suggestion :
NPC corp are not only time restricted but you have to pay a certain amount every week you are in there after the 90 days . Once you reach 120 days you have to pay a monthly fee to keep your hangers until you join a player owned corp . I am not saying make it severely expensive but make it expensive enough to make players want to join player owned corporations .
The war dec system does need work . People should not be allowed to abuse the system by jumping to an npc corp when a war is declared . It is inevitable that a corp will end up in a war dec . Its also possible their is a spy during that time that got recruited b4 the war . The ceo and director should be able to always kick members . even in a war dec .
The rest of what you posted sounds like an indy pilot that is getting harassed by suicide gankers , and you want CCP to stop your ships from going boom . Suicide ganking has its purpose . "ESPECIALLY "in high sec . It actually drives the prices of the ore and mining ships . At certain times of the year prices of ships and ore falls . Along comes HULKAGEDDON and boom the prices jump back up . Also its the only way for people to combat mining bots . |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |