Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
707
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:18:00 -
[121] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:The Apostle wrote:
Like I said before numbnuts, ASK the victims. It IS a problem for them. In ADDITION to the fact that only miners are easy enough targets for gankers BECAUSE of Concord intervention. No other play type is affected by the gank mechanic.
Well thats not true. OK. So cough up your main and I'll put a merc corp on your ass too. We'll' test your theory as well. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

baltec1
156
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:23:00 -
[122] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:baltec1 wrote:The Apostle wrote:
Like I said before numbnuts, ASK the victims. It IS a problem for them. In ADDITION to the fact that only miners are easy enough targets for gankers BECAUSE of Concord intervention. No other play type is affected by the gank mechanic.
Well thats not true. OK. So cough up your main and I'll put a merc corp on your ass too. We'll' test your theory as well.
Not sure how that threat has much relevance but sure, go for it. You're still wrong though. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
707
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:30:00 -
[123] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:The Apostle wrote:baltec1 wrote:The Apostle wrote:
Like I said before numbnuts, ASK the victims. It IS a problem for them. In ADDITION to the fact that only miners are easy enough targets for gankers BECAUSE of Concord intervention. No other play type is affected by the gank mechanic.
Well thats not true. OK. So cough up your main and I'll put a merc corp on your ass too. We'll' test your theory as well. Not sure how that threat has much relevance but sure, go for it. You're still wrong though. It's not a threat. I just need your main and we'll test your theories about ganking as well. I just paid 100m for a Hulk kill. I got billions. Let's play.
This is ofc that you fly a main in highsec giving you the expertise you sprout. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Tanya Fox
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:33:00 -
[124] - Quote
So you say your last thread was a dumb one, which I actually agree with, it was.
So why make another which is equally dumb? |

baltec1
156
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:36:00 -
[125] - Quote
The Apostle wrote: It's not a threat. I just need your main and we'll test your theories about ganking as well. I just paid 100m for a Hulk kill. I got billions. Let's play.
This is ofc that you fly a main in highsec giving you the expertise you sprout.
How much would you pay for this? |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
707
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:36:00 -
[126] - Quote
Tanya Fox wrote:So you say your last thread was a dumb one, which I actually agree with, it was.
So why make another which is equally dumb? And your wonderfully insightful post added to the "dumb" level. Cool. 
But you could've at least said why it's dumb. C'mon sweetie. kiss kiss. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1035
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:37:00 -
[127] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Yer STILL doin' it. GǪbecause you haven't answered the question.
Quote:Like I said before numbnuts, ASK the victims. So have you? What did they say? How is suicide ganking an issue? Or haven't you? If so, what do you base your assertion on? Or don't you know, and are you just making this up?
Quote:In ADDITION to the fact that only miners are easy enough targets for gankers BECAUSE of Concord intervention. No other play type is affected by the gank mechanic. That's patently false, and you know it. You know, it's these kinds of blatant lies that makes it even more important to question your unfounded assertions.
Quote:If you had READ my original post you'd have seen that but like I said, you extract a single sentence and play "20 posts" playing some kind of intellectual mindgame. No. I find the key assertion that your post hinges on and questions its basis for the simple fact that you haven't provided any such basis. It's not GÇ£20 postsGÇ¥ GÇö it's a very simple question. Why is it so hard for you to answer it?
Quote:If you REALLY want to discuss my point GǪyou need to have a point first. So far, you just have an unfounded assertion. I'm asking you to provide something that is actually worth discussing.
So: how is suicide ganking an issue? You have to know the answer because you made the claim, and thus you have no need to refer to anyone else. If all you can do is to refer to someone else, then the answer is clear: it is not an issue, and you're just making things up. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1035
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:37:00 -
[128] - Quote
Psychophantic wrote:Why isn't it an issue? Because he hasn't been explained why it is one. He made the assertion that it is, so he needs to provide the reasoning why it's true. The onus is on him to prove himself right, not on us to prove his unfounded assertion wrong.
Quote:go back to making eve is dying spreadsheets Tippy. I have to start before I can Gǣgo backGǥ, you knowGǪ By the way, did you notice that CCP confirmed the worries expressed in the online count graphs? Want to take a stab at guessing what they show now?
GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
712
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:41:00 -
[129] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:The Apostle wrote: It's not a threat. I just need your main and we'll test your theories about ganking as well. I just paid 100m for a Hulk kill. I got billions. Let's play.
This is ofc that you fly a main in highsec giving you the expertise you sprout.
How much would you pay for this? About the same amount you did. Nothing. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
712
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:43:00 -
[130] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Psychophantic wrote:Why isn't it an issue? Because he hasn't been explained why it is one. He made the assertion that it is, so he needs to provide the reasoning why it's true. The onus is on him to prove himself right, not on us to prove his unfounded assertion wrong. Quote:go back to making eve is dying spreadsheets Tippy. I have to start before I can Gǣgo backGǥ, you knowGǪ By the way, did you notice that CCP confirmed the worries expressed in the online count graphs? Want to take a stab at guessing what they show now? What do you think you're worth Tippia? How much should I spend showing you what a suicide gank feels like? I got billions. Wanna play? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|
|

Psychophantic
83
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:45:00 -
[131] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The onus is on him to prove himself right, not on us to prove his unfounded assertion wrong.
I have an issue with poppy seed buns, the seeds fall off too easily. Therefore there is an issue with poppy seed buns.
Amirite?
|

baltec1
156
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 09:45:00 -
[132] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:baltec1 wrote:The Apostle wrote: It's not a threat. I just need your main and we'll test your theories about ganking as well. I just paid 100m for a Hulk kill. I got billions. Let's play.
This is ofc that you fly a main in highsec giving you the expertise you sprout.
How much would you pay for this? About the same amount you did. Nothing.
Well I guess I will just settle for blowing you're "only miners get ganked" statement out of the water. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
712
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:01:00 -
[133] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:The Apostle wrote:baltec1 wrote:The Apostle wrote: It's not a threat. I just need your main and we'll test your theories about ganking as well. I just paid 100m for a Hulk kill. I got billions. Let's play.
This is ofc that you fly a main in highsec giving you the expertise you sprout.
How much would you pay for this? About the same amount you did. Nothing. Well I guess I will just settle for blowing you're "only miners get ganked" statement out of the water. duh. It's mostly miners. There wasn't 1500 freighters killed in the last month. Obviously with some people ya gotta be so pedantic.
And whose the lameass putting a neut on the freighter? What's he gonna do, shoot at you. Run shield reps? Pro, very pro.
Was it even a gank or a smartbomb that took you all out. lol.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1035
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:02:00 -
[134] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:What do you think you're worth Tippia? How much should I spend showing you what a suicide gank feels like? I got billions. Wanna play? So you have no idea, I take it? After all, you've had 7 pages to come with an answer and have failed to do so, relying instead on the hope that others will provide one for you.
So I suppose that settles it: there is, indeed, no issue with suicide ganking GÇö none that you can think of at least. End of debate. Sad, really, because I would have liked to hear some reasons and have a discussion about the nature of conflict in EVE.
Psychophantic wrote:I have an issue with poppy seed buns, the seeds fall off too easily. Therefore there is an issue with poppy seed buns.
Amirite? It might perhaps be a somewhat silly issue, but at least you explain what the issue is from your point of view. We might quibble about the semantics and logic of creating GÇ£there isGÇ£ out of GÇ£I haveGÇ¥, and the whole thing might slip into a debate over a deliciously fun attempt at defining something as subjective/normative as GÇ£too easilyGÇ¥, but at least we have an issue to discuss. So yes. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
712
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:06:00 -
[135] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Apostle wrote:What do you think you're worth Tippia? How much should I spend showing you what a suicide gank feels like? I got billions. Wanna play? So you have no idea, I take it? After all, you've had 7 pages to come with an answer and have failed to do so, relying instead on the hope that others will provide one for you. So I suppose that settles it: there is, indeed, no issue with suicide ganking GÇö none that you can think of at least. End of debate. Sad, really, because I would have liked to hear some reasons and have a discussion about the nature of conflict in EVE. Psychophantic wrote:I have an issue with poppy seed buns, the seeds fall off too easily. Therefore there is an issue with poppy seed buns.
Amirite? It might perhaps be a somewhat silly issue, but at least you explain what the issue is from your point of view. We might quibble about the semantics and logic of creating GÇ£there isGÇ£ out of GÇ£I haveGÇ¥, and the whole thing might slip into a debate over a deliciously fun attempt at defining something as subjective/normative as GÇ£too easilyGÇ¥, but at least we have an issue to discuss. So yes. /me plays Tippias' game.
So how much DO you think you're worth Tippia and where do you fly? I am a man of action and I want to SHOW you rather than post another 20 pages of quote me / quote you.
I really don't want to waste millions getting a merc corp to show you all about suicide ganking if you just gonna sit in station all day running your mouth.
Either that or stfu. You're boring. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Zoe Alarhun
The Proactive Reappropriation Corporation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:07:00 -
[136] - Quote
Why don't miners just use the Caldari rokh battleship to mine during times of trouble ? Can't you fit a pretty hefty tank on one of those things (enough so that common suicide ships don't have enough firepower to take em down before concordokken) while still maintaining a reasonable mining output ? Didn't miners use them before the mining barges where introduced ? |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
713
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:11:00 -
[137] - Quote
Zoe Alarhun wrote:Why don't miners just use the Caldari rokh battleship to mine during times of trouble ? Can't you fit a pretty hefty tank on one of those things (enough so that common suicide ships don't have enough firepower to take em down before concordokken) while still maintaining a reasonable mining output ? Didn't miners use them before the mining barges where introduced ? Yes. But as even baltec showed, concerted ganking can kill anything.
Tank is not and never will be enough. It's a flawed mechanic being abused. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1035
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:12:00 -
[138] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:So how much DO you think you're worth Tippia and where do you fly? Oh come on! I'm the easiest person to find the the EVE cluster. Wow. You really have no clue about ganking have you. Anyway, go start a new thread if you want to discuss my whereabouts GÇö it's not the topic of this thread.
The question here is: how is suicide ganking an issue? You have no answer.
Quote:Either that or stfu. You're boring. Well, then, answer the question so we can move on to the fun part. (Or, for that matter, admit that you have no idea, so at least the rest of us can have some funGǪ and it probably won't be boring, exactly, for you either).
Quote:Tank is not and never will be enough. It's a flawed mechanic being abused. That holds true for all combat. So it does not follow that it's a flawed mechanic, or that it is being abused. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
715
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:19:00 -
[139] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Apostle wrote:So how much DO you think you're worth Tippia and where do you fly? Oh come on! I'm the easiest person to find the the EVE cluster. Wow. You really have no clue about ganking have you. Anyway, go start a new thread if you want to discuss my whereabouts GÇö it's not the topic of this thread. Yes. So tell me. My locator agent and my scout can't find you.
And no. I have no idea about ganking, obviously, you said so. You're a 4 char corp, 100% tax, 25 kills in total, none since 2009.
Yep. You ARE the epitome of expert. I bow in reverence.
And since I have no idea, I betcha there's a merc corp that does and likes my coin. Is it still PvP? Is it still ganking if I pay someone else to do it?
And it is VERY relevant to this topic because I want to SHOW you why ganking is such an issue.
How much should I spend Tippia? I got billions. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Tanya Fox
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:20:00 -
[140] - Quote
The Apostle wrote: Many arguments stem from the fact that miners should not be risk free and nor should they be able to make isk risk free. It's said that it should be allowed for 'economic' reasons ad nauseum.
However, the same should also be said for mission runners but we know they can't be ganked without serious firepower and dedication. So the whole concept of preventing "risk free income" in highsec is void right there.
If we accept that this is the reasoning behind ganking, we must also ask why suicide ganking is actually neccessary. Why not war-dec and get the free kill? No Concord and no sec status hit. Why indeed?
It's because half the miners (an assumption) sit in NPC corps - many are bots. Even if they join a "real" corp they can simply hop corps on a war-dec. They have MADE mining a relatively risk free pasttime and suicide ganking is the ONLY way to counter it.
With this in mind why should we not seek changes to provide for greater PvP opportunities AND allow for both economic, strategic and tactical advantages by killing both miners AND missioners.
You're making the mistake of thinking that many of the miners in an NPC corp are bots, they're not. It is true that mining is a boring profession with the mining mechanics of the game and as such a lot of miners semi-afk whislt they mine but they're not botting.
Ofc there are bots in the game but they're equally just as much in player corporations.
I don't see your posts as having anything really constructive in them, it seems you're pushing your own agenda whilst trying to disguise it a bit.
The Apostle wrote:
This can only be done with 2 changes imho
1) Remove the ability to stay in an NPC for greater than some arbitrary time. (eg: 90 days). Failure to join a corp involves seizure of assets until you do..
Some reasons why people stay in NPC corps in no particular order:
1) A lot of the players corps for want of a better word are crap. 2) There are quite a few of the smaller player corps that have 100+ listed but only about 10 actually play on a regular basis. 3) There are more players in an NPC corp than most player corps (not talking about alliances). 4) People have time commitments in RL so do not want to commit to a player corp. 5) Players can play the game the way they want without the corp imposing their playstyle on them. 6) Player corps impose restrictions like how many sp you have to have before they will consider even allowing you to join. 7) Player corps are too nosey some want full disclosure on your character before they will consider you. And a lot of player think it's non of their business. 8) Small player corps can be frequently war-dec'd because the war-decing corp wants easy kills to boost their killmails.
Actually killmails and ranks are the worst thing that can happen to a pvp game, because it does not promote pvp it just promotes ganking.
I'm sure I could add to that list, but I think you get the picture.
If you did get what you want in number 1, you would just see another large wave of people leave Eve, so you would have even less people playing. In some ways it could be entertaining because the weaker gankers would become the ganked.
The Apostle wrote: 2) Once a war-dec has been declared, NO members can either leave or join during the declaration.
Ofc, the miners still need some kind of protection from mindless violence when there are now more ways to kill them, validly and legitimately. An inability to target unarmed vessels UNLESS war-decced is a potential option.
And ofc, there are those that say this makes for 'consensual PvP' and to some extent it does. But war-dec mechanics exist in highsec for a reason and we should be making these mechanics far more effective. At the moment they're as good as pointless.
The alternative is to invalidate the entire concept of highsec, remove the neccessity to war-dec, remove Concord and let players decide who lives or dies. A true sandbox.
To be frank, it won't make the slightest difference to miners whether highsec, Concord or any such measures exist. They're dying anyway. Let's get highsec missioners and all other risk free isk makers in on the killmails as well.
Discuss....
This is where your really agenda is, making high-sec more of a PvP area. |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1035
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:30:00 -
[141] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:My locator agent and my scout can't find you. Again with the lies. 
Quote:I betcha there's a merc corp that does and likes my coin. Is it still PvP? Is it still ganking if I pay someone else to do it? It's still PvP. Whether it's ganking or not depends on the method. Whether it's suicide ganking or not depends on how they choose to pay for it. None of it is relevant to the topic at hand.
Quote:And it is VERY relevant to this topic because I want to SHOW you why ganking is such an issue. So, again, you have no idea, and/or you can't explain it. It is not an issue as far as you can tell. Good. We know this already, you don't really need to prove it any more. It's a nice red herring, but it doesn't help the fact that you have no idea what the supposed problem is, so you cannot really speak to what kinds of solutions are needed, or, indeed, if any solutions are needed at all.
And I have no idea what it's worth for you to try to mend your broken ego GÇö it's for you to decide. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
715
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:34:00 -
[142] - Quote
Tanya Fox wrote:This is where your really agenda is, making high-sec more of a PvP area. You got it. That's EXACTLY what I'm saying. But my reasons are not so obvious.
By doing as I am suggesting, "fighting men" will become targets ALL DAY, EVERY DAY, EVERY WHERE.
They ALL use highsec for SAFETY because they CANNOT be reasonably ganked before Concord. This very safety allows THEM to fly around as long as those that cannot tank are dead meat.
And the whole while, MINERS and UNARMED industrials should STOP WHINING because they ARE targets. "Sandbox", "This is Eve" ad nauseam.
My point is to prove that "fighting men" DO NOT want this. It's a double bluff and the responses are proving this very fact.
Miners are already stuffed. Let's ADD missioners, Incursion runners and EVERY combat vessel to higshec killmails and stop being shallow, lazy cowards with excuses that do NOT apply to the people saying it.
They will fight this because it will **** up THEIR game. I knew this BEFORE I posted. It's why I did. Some people just haven't worked it out yet.
+1
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Zoe Alarhun
The Proactive Reappropriation Corporation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:35:00 -
[143] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Zoe Alarhun wrote:Why don't miners just use the Caldari rokh battleship to mine during times of trouble ? Can't you fit a pretty hefty tank on one of those things (enough so that common suicide ships don't have enough firepower to take em down before concordokken) while still maintaining a reasonable mining output ? Didn't miners use them before the mining barges where introduced ? Yes. But as even baltec showed, concerted ganking can kill anything. Tank is not and never will be enough. It's a flawed mechanic being abused.
Concerted ganking can kill anything - that's how firepower works. There's only a finite amount of health while you can apply a theoretical infinite amount of dps if you have enough people/ships.
But right now people are complaining about brutixes/Thrashers killing their stuff solo. A rokh can fit a big enough tank so that neither of those ships can take it out quickly. If there's a bunch of them, if you spot them on scan roaming towards you (because groups of battlecruisers/battleship don't just hang a round belts). If you stay aligned you can warp out easliy. You have decent tank to take the small guys.
When the ganking craze dies down you can go back to flying barges. What is the problem ? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1035
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:37:00 -
[144] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Miners are already stuffed. Let's ADD missioners, Incursion runners and EVERY combat vessel to higshec killmails and stop being shallow, lazy cowards with excuses that do NOT apply to the people saying it. Yes. Let's add the people who are already on those killmails. Wait what?  GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Ann133566
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:37:00 -
[145] - Quote
I have no big issues with miners, everyone should be able to play the game as they please. However it has low gameplay engagement along with plexing and ratting and missioning. All you have to do is click target and fire. Any fool can do that, there is no skill and knowhow involved. Frankly it's dull and low risk and needs a shakeup, for example spawning a tough NPC that tackles and does enough DPSt o make miners, missioners to at least worry their empty little heads instead of these rats that pop if u sneeze of them.
Nothing should be risk free in the game, the fact that bots can do these things, says a lot. Playing EVE should never be a comfortable experience. Everyone from missioners, miners, plexers and pvpers should always be looking over their shoulders and should be punnished for falling asleep at the wheel. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
715
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:40:00 -
[146] - Quote
Zoe Alarhun wrote:The Apostle wrote:Zoe Alarhun wrote:Why don't miners just use the Caldari rokh battleship to mine during times of trouble ? Can't you fit a pretty hefty tank on one of those things (enough so that common suicide ships don't have enough firepower to take em down before concordokken) while still maintaining a reasonable mining output ? Didn't miners use them before the mining barges where introduced ? Yes. But as even baltec showed, concerted ganking can kill anything. Tank is not and never will be enough. It's a flawed mechanic being abused. Concerted ganking can kill anything - that's how firepower works. There's only a finite amount of health while you can apply a theoretical infinite amount of dps if you have enough people/ships. But right now people are complaining about brutixes/Thrashers killing their stuff solo. A rokh can fit a big enough tank so that neither of those ships can take it out quickly. If there's a bunch of them, if you spot them on scan roaming towards you (because groups of battlecruisers/battleship don't just hang a round belts). If you stay aligned you can warp out easliy. You have decent tank to take the small guys. When the ganking craze dies down you can go back to flying barges. What is the problem ? G**ns are even killing Orcas mate. My point is no ship is safe - ever - but more so industrials. My argument is, and always has been that suicide ganking in highsec IS illegal (check the repercussions for doing it) but accepted.
It's deemed "neccessary" to kill industrials because guys who want to blow **** up cannot reasonably kill COMBAT vessels.
The mechanic is one sided and broken.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
715
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:44:00 -
[147] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Apostle wrote:Miners are already stuffed. Let's ADD missioners, Incursion runners and EVERY combat vessel to higshec killmails and stop being shallow, lazy cowards with excuses that do NOT apply to the people saying it. Yes. Let's add the people who are already on those killmails. Wait what?  wha???
Under war-dec. Yes. Suicide gank. Rare.
Maybe you mean the gankers? Killmails? Concord doesn't keep one. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
715
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:46:00 -
[148] - Quote
Ann133566 wrote:I have no big issues with miners, everyone should be able to play the game as they please. ........ ..... should be punnished for falling asleep at the wheel. Lol. Burp. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Zoe Alarhun
The Proactive Reappropriation Corporation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 10:50:00 -
[149] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Zoe Alarhun wrote:The Apostle wrote:Zoe Alarhun wrote:Why don't miners just use the Caldari rokh battleship to mine during times of trouble ? Can't you fit a pretty hefty tank on one of those things (enough so that common suicide ships don't have enough firepower to take em down before concordokken) while still maintaining a reasonable mining output ? Didn't miners use them before the mining barges where introduced ? Yes. But as even baltec showed, concerted ganking can kill anything. Tank is not and never will be enough. It's a flawed mechanic being abused. Concerted ganking can kill anything - that's how firepower works. There's only a finite amount of health while you can apply a theoretical infinite amount of dps if you have enough people/ships. But right now people are complaining about brutixes/Thrashers killing their stuff solo. A rokh can fit a big enough tank so that neither of those ships can take it out quickly. If there's a bunch of them, if you spot them on scan roaming towards you (because groups of battlecruisers/battleship don't just hang a round belts). If you stay aligned you can warp out easliy. You have decent tank to take the small guys. When the ganking craze dies down you can go back to flying barges. What is the problem ? G**ns are even killing Orcas mate. My point is no ship is safe - ever - but more so industrials. My argument is, and always has been that suicide ganking in highsec IS illegal (check the repercussions for doing it) but accepted. It's deemed "neccessary" to kill industrials because guys who want to blow **** up cannot reasonably kill COMBAT vessels. The mechanic is one sided and broken.
How is it one sided - you can kill a mission ship just as easily. Some energy neuts kill most active tanks (which good mission runners use) meaning they can't rep which means the rats + you kill them. Also fit damage type that they arn't tanked against. Almost 0 risk and you don't get your ship raeped by concord.
Needless to say in low sec and nullsec combat vessels get blown up all the time. What is the problem with suicide ganking ? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1035
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 11:12:00 -
[150] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:My argument is, and always has been that suicide ganking in highsec IS illegal (check the repercussions for doing it) but accepted. GǪand the question has always been: yes? So what? Just because it's GǣillegalGǥ doesn't mean that it's wrong or broken, and it most certainly does not mean that it's not allowed.
Quote:It's deemed "neccessary" to kill industrials because guys who want to blow **** up cannot reasonably kill COMBAT vessels. No, it's deemed necessary because said industrialists are part of the war machine and thus need to be disruptable, and because the game is open-ended enough not to force people into corps, if they either decide they don't need the benefits, or if they decide they don't want to deal with the downsides.
Quote:The mechanic is one sided and broken. How so?
Quote:wha??? Under war-dec. Yes. Suicide gank. Rare. No, as ganks. In fact, I'd venture to guess that outside of these kinds of orchestrated events, mission runners in particular are common targets because they're actually worth a gank. On any non-campaign day, check the kill heatmaps GÇö they are not exactly concentrated on mining areasGǪ
If anything, it's the opposite: it takes a particular kind of idiocy to run missions while at war, so it's far rarer that those boats get violenced under wardec than as part of a suicide gank (wellGǪ unless the owners suffer from that other kind of idiocy that makes them try to use their mission boats as player-combat ships). GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |