Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

baltec1
165
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 22:15:00 -
[121] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Aida Nu wrote:Ok Mr 7 accounts.
It's 4. Aida Nu wrote: EVEs core mechanics and idea should NOT change because miners are to lazy to align to a station and keep an eye on the overview if a combat ship is approaching them.
Ofc. Your views are noted and have been waxed lyrically on by a few with the same moronic mentality. "Combat ship approaching" and "Align to station" are two such moronic points of contention. As I have said countless times, you are asking me to believe that EVERY SINGLE MINER of the 1500+ taken out by Goons in the ice interdiction alone were stupid and had no idea at all how to play. NONE of them?
Considering the publicity, the people getting killed all around them, the spam in local and the fact this is only happening in a handfull of systems in gal space and a shockingly large number of people have lost more than one ship I have to say yes. Those miners are the hight of stupid. |

Aida Nu
Nu Industries
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 22:25:00 -
[122] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:
Ofc. Your views are noted and have been waxed lyrically on by a few with the same moronic mentality.
"Combat ship approaching" and "Align to station" are two such moronic points of contention.
As I have said countless times, you are asking me to believe that EVERY SINGLE MINER of the 1500+ taken out by Goons in the ice interdiction alone were stupid and had no idea at all how to play. NONE of them?
No Sir, YOUR views are noted and disregarded. And the only one "waxing lyrically" is YOU and your alts. The rest of us are enjoying EVE for what it is.
And yes, I do believe that all miners getting ganked are stupid, or bots. A miner parks his boat and does other stuff while his modules cycle and collects ores. And since they are not paying attention to the game they die.
THE SOLE REASON MINERS GET GANKED IS STUPIDITY OR AFKING. Any miner with his brain turned on will see a threat coming a mile away and gtfo. Another reason that CCP should look into mining and make it more interactive. Because the current system is so braindead that doing other stuff while your modules cycle is very understandable. But do not come to the forums and complain if you were not paying attention.
|

Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
544
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 22:30:00 -
[123] - Quote
Vricrolatious wrote:Actually, if you read the chat logs posted to our internal boards and some of the eve mails that have posted, you'd be inclined to agree that a great many of those lost barges were flown by people that had no idea they could even be shot at in High Sec. He's not joking about this. When the interdiction started I used to get daily threats from pubbies about reporting me for shooting them in high sec.
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
804
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 22:45:00 -
[124] - Quote
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:Vricrolatious wrote:Actually, if you read the chat logs posted to our internal boards and some of the eve mails that have posted, you'd be inclined to agree that a great many of those lost barges were flown by people that had no idea they could even be shot at in High Sec. He's not joking about this. When the interdiction started I used to get daily threats from pubbies about reporting me for shooting them in high sec. And I'm not arguing this either. I ran a litle experiment yesterday that went like this.
I started an alt. Undocked, took a shot at some dude, get my little yellow tag for "aesthetic purposes".
I then went out to some random belt with 0.6, and orbited 2 Hulks and an Orca sitting less than 2k apart. I even locked and scanned and made every pretense that I was a warp-in point. They didn't move. 1 or 2 smartied BS's would have done some serious pain.
With one other mining gang, I did exactly the same thing, they warped off but they would have been dead long before they got to warp speed.
My point is that a lot of people are 1) arrogant or ignorant enough to think they can't be killed or 2) simply have no idea.
I'm not about to make excuses for arrogance but I'm adamant that we need to be providing ways to be more tolerant of ignorance. Noobs DON'T get Eve until they are dead in their 200m Hulks. Then they may just as well quit.
If ganking activity escalates to a prolonged and sustained campaign, the ramification of potential unsubs and/or a direct intervention by CCP MAY well occur.
THIS worries me more than wasting my time trying to bash you for defending a quaint idealogy. Some people just don't get Eve and we need to be making a place or a process to give them time to adjust to the realities, if the status quo should remain. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
804
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 22:49:00 -
[125] - Quote
Aida Nu wrote:Any miner with his brain turned on will see a threat coming a mile away and gtfo.
Calling this for the bullshit it is. And if you were'nt such a new char to eve-O you'd know that this has been repeatedly refuted with several examples.
Even the BEST and SMARTEST miner can be ganked. The only variables needed are TIME and QUANTITY.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Aida Nu
Nu Industries
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 22:51:00 -
[126] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Skunk Gracklaw wrote:Vricrolatious wrote:Actually, if you read the chat logs posted to our internal boards and some of the eve mails that have posted, you'd be inclined to agree that a great many of those lost barges were flown by people that had no idea they could even be shot at in High Sec. He's not joking about this. When the interdiction started I used to get daily threats from pubbies about reporting me for shooting them in high sec. And I'm not arguing this either. I ran a litle experiment yesterday that went like this. I started an alt. Undocked, took a shot at some dude, get my little yellow tag for "aesthetic purposes". I then went out to some random belt with 0.6, and orbited 2 Hulks and an Orca sitting less than 2k apart. I even locked and scanned and made every pretense that I was a warp-in point. They didn't move. 1 or 2 smartied BS's would have done some serious pain. With one other mining gang, I did exactly the same thing, they warped off but they would have been dead long before they got to warp speed. My point is that a lot of people are 1) arrogant or ignorant enough to think they can't be killed or 2) simply have no idea. I'm not about to make excuses for arrogance but I'm adamant that we need to be providing ways to be more tolerant of ignorance. Noobs DON'T get Eve until they are dead in their 200m Hulks. Then they may just as well quit. If ganking activity escalates to a prolonged and sustained campaign, the ramification of potential unsubs and/or a direct intervention by CCP MAY well occur. THIS worries me more than wasting my time trying to bash you for defending a quaint idealogy. Some people just don't get Eve and we need to be making a place or a process to give them time to adjust to the realities, if the status quo should remain.
Here is an idea. Every time you activate a mining module, a popup window comes up explaning that you can die even if you are in highsec, what steps to take to protect yourself and hinting that combat ships closing in might be trouble and that you should not mine afk or risk loosing your ship. Much like when you jump into lowsec or about to commit a crime.
|

Aida Nu
Nu Industries
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 22:56:00 -
[127] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Aida Nu wrote:Any miner with his brain turned on will see a threat coming a mile away and gtfo.
Calling this for the bullshit it is. And if you were'nt such a new char to eve-O you'd know that this has been repeatedly refuted with several examples. Even the BEST and SMARTEST miner can be ganked. The only variables needed are TIME and QUANTITY.
So since im such a clueless noob and all my arguments are bullshit why dont you enlighten us?
So every profession in EVE should have risk involved except mining? Is that what you are saying? Missioners can loose ships to if scrambled by a rat or some other mishap. Should missions ships be invulnerable so they dont risk loosing them and start mass unsubs.

|

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
59
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 22:59:00 -
[128] - Quote
Nice to see that I got the covneration rolling. Seven pages and counting.
Let me just set one thing straight. I condone ganking miners and missioners up until the point when we start talking about bots. From there, that's when I start becoming a little more friendly to the carebear miners. Why? Because I generally don't like it when gankers are attacking any miner or missioner in a given system simply because they are not sure as to which ship is a bot (in other words, they don't do their homework).
I know, it's a huge double standard I am putting up for display here. How could I possibly condone suicide ganking if I don't condone ganking innocent miners for the purpose of mitigating the bot problem? Simple: Bots are not suppose to be part of the game. They're illegal in the game anyways.
Now, if we're talking about ganking for the purpose of winning a prize in an event or for trying to stake a claim on a belt that you don't want anyone else to have or for just getting people to buy mining ships to replace, then by all means, go right ahead.
Like I said earlier, since morality is left at the login screen for most players here, not a lot of things will make sense.
PS: For those pointing out that being in a station is 100% safe, I got a question: Have you tried to scam someone through a trade or contract? Have you dealt with 0.01ISK games? Have you seen your corp assets get stolen by a corp thief? |

Vricrolatious
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:14:00 -
[129] - Quote
The Apostle wrote: My point is that a lot of people are 1) arrogant or ignorant enough to think they can't be killed or 2) simply have no idea.
I'm not about to make excuses for arrogance but I'm adamant that we need to be providing ways to be more tolerant of ignorance. Noobs DON'T get Eve until they are dead in their 200m Hulks. Then they may just as well quit.
For some people, ganking is fun, though I admit it's never been my thing. I know, I'm a terrible Goon (though not a proper Goon, so I suppose that makes me... nevermind,) but I've always supported that the mechanic exist in game, just like I've supported scams but have never run them.
To run with your point on dead Hulks, if you own a Hulk, you've probably been training for several weeks (roughly 100 days or more depending on dedication to skill plans and such,) which means you should not be a newbie anymore. Again, you've been in game for over three months, so you're not a newbie anymore... not to the game as a whole. If you've been mining for the whole time, you've probably seen other people lose a ship or caught the chat in local after it happens. In 100 days you will have been expodes to the fact that High Sec is not safe, it's just safer. Like I mentioned a page (or maybe two back now,) CCP includes a tutorial that forces you to lose a ship. It's one of the combat tutorials, but it's still there.
EVE is not a friendly place, most of the people in game want to murder you and the ones that don't are either lying or just trying to find a way to scam you out of everything you own. CCP has intervened on things before, like being able to shoot gang / fleet members without CONCORD jumping in, but in that case, that was an abuse of game mechanics. It was also preventing people from asking others for help or grouping up with strangers and you'll notice, people still have issues fleeting up with strangeers. Ganking is a part of EVE and as long as the ship used to commit this act of violence is destroyed, it's not an exploit and not something CCP should mess with. Sure, I'm on board if they want to yank insurance, but that won't stop a lot of people since it's easy to make isk to cover those losses and in our case, the alliance pays out bounties (used as an example) on destroyed ice miners, so Goons will still be in business.
Honestly, the best advise I could give to someone that wants to mine and be safe... join a decent nullsec alliance and move out of empire. I've mined (I'm not afraid to admit it) in High, Low and Nullsec and mining in Nullsec was probably the safest I've been when it came to mining. The best belts need to be scanned down, which means the reds and neutrals need probes to find you and that gives you extra time to warp to a POS and safe up before they find you and make veldspar dust out of you.
I know, it's a lot of words...
WIDot, Best Dot, Even Sans Dot! -Vric |

Vricrolatious
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:17:00 -
[130] - Quote
Henry Haphorn wrote:PS: For those pointing out that being in a station is 100% safe, I got a question: Have you tried to scam someone through a trade or contract? Have you dealt with 0.01ISK games? Have you seen your corp assets get stolen by a corp thief? 
EVE is a PvP game, there are only slight differences between market PvP and combat PvP, it's all PvP. WIDot, Best Dot, Even Sans Dot! -Vric |
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
805
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:18:00 -
[131] - Quote
Aida Nu wrote:The Apostle wrote:Aida Nu wrote:Any miner with his brain turned on will see a threat coming a mile away and gtfo.
Calling this for the bullshit it is. And if you were'nt such a new char to eve-O you'd know that this has been repeatedly refuted with several examples. Even the BEST and SMARTEST miner can be ganked. The only variables needed are TIME and QUANTITY. So since im such a clueless noob and all my arguments are bullshit why dont you enlighten me? So every profession in EVE should have risk involved except mining? Is that what you are saying? Missioners can loose ships to if scrambled by a rat or some other mishap. Should missions ships be invulnerable so they dont risk loosing them and start mass unsubs?  Lol. Been down this road too.
A missioner recieves a far higher reward for his endeavours and his risk is proportionate. Regardless, you're talking about an PvE kill versus PvP.
And for the record, I've even said we should remove Concord protection in mission space to balance the risk better.
The risk v reward quotient is way out of proportion for miners unless 1) insurance is beefed for mining vessels or 2) the tank is made good enough to withstand all but (uninsured) massive alpha strike (evens up the losses proportionally) or 3) miners are given greater reward for their efforts.
A WH or 0.0 miner SHOULD NOT ever complain about losses - but he runs the risk because he can pull MUCH higher rewards for the risk.
A 3m/hr Veld digger affords no such luxury. It's the imbalance in risk v reward that is questionable. We need to either reduce the risk or make the reward commensurate to the risk.
Nothing more and nothing less. Preventing ganking is ONE option. There MUST be others.
One thing for sure, I'm not STUCK in mindset on this. Never have been.
Nonetheless, forums are meant for discussing stuff not just reposting everyone else memes and dare to call it an intelligent debate. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Borun Tal
Space Pods Inc
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:19:00 -
[132] - Quote
Quote:Those who miners and missioners who wish to be left alone.
What?!!?!?!
tl;dr (Inane subject line) |

Ficus Plant
The Plant Initiative
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:20:00 -
[133] - Quote
Personally, having done my fair share of mining, 0.0 boredom, missions, market PvP, etc, etc, I have no issue with the ganking or whatever. It is EVE, and should never change. It is part of the game's attraction for many of us who play.
My only issue is, and always has been, that those who get Concorded still get insurance payments. Still the dumbest thing I have ever heard. |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
59
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:26:00 -
[134] - Quote
Borun Tal wrote:Quote:Those who miners and missioners who wish to be left alone. What?!!?!?! tl;dr (Inane subject line)
I guess I should fix that then.   |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
805
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:27:00 -
[135] - Quote
Vricrolatious wrote:Honestly, the best advise I could give to someone that wants to mine and be safe... join a decent nullsec alliance and move out of empire. I've mined (I'm not afraid to admit it) in High, Low and Nullsec and mining in Nullsec was probably the safest I've been when it came to mining. The best belts need to be scanned down, which means the reds and neutrals need probes to find you and that gives you extra time to warp to a POS and safe up before they find you and make veldspar dust out of you.
As perverse as it is for me to agree with a Goon this is perfectly true and may well prove to a consequence of continued highssec ganking. Better the known enemy.
But it may cause issues for Eve as a whole because to mine for Alliance X and sell to Alliance Y could well be seen as treason.
There may be alliance embargoes about selling rocks on the open market, in addition to alliances themselves putting the squeeze on miners profits through ridiculous refining percentages.
This will become a very serious inflation issue if the rumour about Drone mineral drops are also true.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
59
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:30:00 -
[136] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Vricrolatious wrote:Honestly, the best advise I could give to someone that wants to mine and be safe... join a decent nullsec alliance and move out of empire. I've mined (I'm not afraid to admit it) in High, Low and Nullsec and mining in Nullsec was probably the safest I've been when it came to mining. The best belts need to be scanned down, which means the reds and neutrals need probes to find you and that gives you extra time to warp to a POS and safe up before they find you and make veldspar dust out of you.
As perverse as it is for me to agree with a Goon this is perfectly true and may well prove to a consequence of continued highssec ganking. Better the known enemy. But it may cause issues for Eve as a whole because to mine for Alliance X and sell to Alliance Y could well be seen as treason. There may be alliance embargoes about selling rocks on the open market, in addition to alliances themselves putting the squeeze on miners profits through ridiculous refining percentages. This will become a very serious inflation issue if the rumour about Drone mineral drops are also true.
Thus, another reason why I left Majesta Empire. |

Aida Nu
Nu Industries
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:33:00 -
[137] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:
risk vs reward poor miners blah blah etc stuff
Poor miners? How are they poor? Cut the crap man seriously. And 3m/h might apply for starter characters that are a couple week old. Miners sit on their fat asses doing nothing and earn isk while watching a movie, reading a book or whatever they do. And just by paying just a tiny bit of attention they dont risk anything. Rewards in highsec are already to high vs risk. Highsec should be nerfred not buffed.
But as many have said, yes doing minor changes to, for example insurance (cutting it in half if you are killed by Concord), is something that most players can accept. Making miners immune to game mechanics is not something people will accept. Deal with it, accept it, adapt or move on to another game. Period.
|

Paragon Renegade
The Multinational Company.
60
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:33:00 -
[138] - Quote
Probably the best Goon poster.
And Apostle is pretty cool, he kills rocks & doesn't afraid of anything. "Man, you aren't actually trying to do this, right? Nobody is that stupid right?"
"How wrong you are" |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
60
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:45:00 -
[139] - Quote
Paragon Renegade wrote:Probably the best Goon poster. And Apostle is pretty cool, he kills rocks & doesn't afraid of anything. And are you still arguing about semantics?
I think Apostle is cool too, regardless of the debate we just had. He sounds like the sort of person I can talk to while mining. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
805
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:45:00 -
[140] - Quote
Aida Nu wrote:The Apostle wrote:
risk vs reward poor miners blah blah etc stuff
Poor miners? How are they poor? Cut the crap man seriously. And 3m/h might apply for starter characters that are a couple week old. Miners sit on their fat asses doing nothing and earn isk while watching a movie, reading a book or whatever they do. And just by paying just a tiny bit of attention they dont risk anything. Rewards in highsec are already to high vs risk. Highsec should be nerfed not buffed. But as many have said, yes doing minor changes to, for example insurance (cutting it in half if you are killed by Concord), is something that most players can accept. Making miners immune to game mechanics is not something people will accept. Deal with it, accept it, adapt or move on to another game. Period. Then the only thing we can agree on is that we disagree. If you seriously believe that ganking is so easily avoided then anything I have to say is void. The statistics speak for themselves.
PS: I must admit I chuckle at "he" shouldn't be allowed to do what he wants when one of the potential solutions is about preventing "you" from doing what "you" want. I don;t know if you have the intelligence to see the irony. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo!
|
|

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
240
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:45:00 -
[141] - Quote
At some point the banking will lead to prices of materials rising. Then the price will rise so high that it becomes worth risking a Hulk or Mackinaw to harvest ice. This will not encourage hisec mining, since harvesting ice in null sec is far safer: your alliance is already controlling who is in that system, and you have the option of shooting first.
So for the moment, the price of oxytopes will rise, the ROI of harvesting ice in Gallente space will drop, and three gankers will continue to be enough to lock down a hisec system.
Would the ice interdiction be stopped if the costs of sustained ganking rose by an order of magnitude? Would opportunistic suicide ganking of freighters be stopped if the costs of sustained ganking rose by an order of magnitude?
Consider the cost of interdicting all mining activities in a null sec system: one AFK capsuleer flying a cloaky ship of any variety (though ideally a covert ops or recon with a covert cyno). The hisec interdiction is effectively the same thing, though hisec denizens do not have the same tools available to defend against the interdiction: the only options are to declare war against the parties involved (which won't work since they'll just hop corps or flood the system with a thousand corp mates), or move out. Ganking the interdiction fleet will not help since they effectively have unlimited funds, there is no way of preventing them keeping a medical clone in the same system, and there is no way of preventing them from importing all the resources they need to continue the process.
What it then boils down to is time. The interdiction is a numbers game, currently biased quite heavily in favour of the interdictors. To maintain an interdiction of a system should require more than three pilots. Working on the time factor should help in some ways: perhaps GCCs in hisec could be extended where a pilot incurs more than one GCC in a 24 hour period? Say, a doubling for every offence within 24 hours of a previous one, with the timer halving for every 24 hour period since the last offence, with a floor at 15 minutes? This could quickly lead to the situation of the interdiction requiring the involvement of more pilots, costing more player time. The quick remedies would be to move more alts from the same account into the system: this would maintain a stable state at 12 hours of GCC for each character, assuming each character was used to gank as soon as possible after the last attempt.
Having suicide ganks incur a faction standing hit might have some benefit: say a faction standing hit of 10% for each unlawful aggression in a faction's space. Thus a sustained ganking programme will end up with faction navies attacking the ganker. This will not impact too severely on opportunistic suicide gankers, they will have ample opportunity to restore their faction standings through storyline missions.
I don't believe that "buffing" CONCORD will have any impact, since gankers will simply adjust to kill the target before CONCORD arrives. Buffing faction navies might help to some degree, especially if suicide ganks incur a faction standing hit.
In the meantime, the system is as it is. It's up to the players to adapt to the game being played by other players. Goonswarm is creating content & drama, which is a good thing. I think they have it too easy though.
|

baltec1
166
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:50:00 -
[142] - Quote
The Apostle wrote: Then the only thing we can agree on is that we disagree. If you seriously believe that ganking is so easily avoided then anything I have to say is void. The statistics speak for themselves.
Yes they do.
The vast bulk of miners will never be suicide ganked. |

Paragon Renegade
The Multinational Company.
61
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:53:00 -
[143] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:The Apostle wrote: Then the only thing we can agree on is that we disagree. If you seriously believe that ganking is so easily avoided then anything I have to say is void. The statistics speak for themselves.
Yes they do. The vast bulk of miners will never be suicide ganked.
Most people are ganked in Hisec at least once; I base this off of eye-witness "Testimony" and seeing it first hand many times; Especially in Hek. "Man, you aren't actually trying to do this, right? Nobody is that stupid right?"
"How wrong you are" |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum KUGUTSUMEN.
249
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:55:00 -
[144] - Quote
Anyone who seriously mines in highsec deserves to be ganked. As a miner you could easily get accepted into any renter alliance or nullsec alliance that has a Indy Corp. You could then site in hidden belts mining ABC ore making 10x what you do in highsec. Most corporations will buy your ore close to Jita price and even if it is lower its still more then you make in highsec. Added to the fact that you are surrounded by intel channels and have a clear idea of who is hostile or not. Lastly as a miner you generally aren't really expected to do much other then maybe a mining Op 1-2 times a week. |

Hauling Hal
The Black Ops
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 23:56:00 -
[145] - Quote
As I said in another thread, the miners and mission runners that you despise so much make up the majority of the players, so your 'HTFU or GTFO' comment is a little naive, as you'd soon get very bored with noone to shoot and a game that is no longer financially viable to develop any further.
The 'hard core' players don't get the 'game' concept as much as the PvE players don't get the 'gank' concept. The hard core players are either trying to win at a MMO (well, DUH!) or trying to make RL money out of it, whilst everyone else is just playing a game:
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/online_gaming |

Aida Nu
Nu Industries
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 00:03:00 -
[146] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Aida Nu wrote:The Apostle wrote:
risk vs reward poor miners blah blah etc stuff
Poor miners? How are they poor? Cut the crap man seriously. And 3m/h might apply for starter characters that are a couple week old. Miners sit on their fat asses doing nothing and earn isk while watching a movie, reading a book or whatever they do. And just by paying just a tiny bit of attention they dont risk anything. Rewards in highsec are already to high vs risk. Highsec should be nerfed not buffed. But as many have said, yes doing minor changes to, for example insurance (cutting it in half if you are killed by Concord), is something that most players can accept. Making miners immune to game mechanics is not something people will accept. Deal with it, accept it, adapt or move on to another game. Period. Then the only thing we can agree on is that we disagree. If you seriously believe that ganking is so easily avoided then anything I have to say is void. The statistics speak for themselves. PS: I must admit I chuckle at "he" shouldn't be allowed to do what he wants when one of the potential solutions is about preventing "you" from doing what "you" want. I don;t know if you have the intelligence to see the irony.
What statistics man? You keep claiming things without backing them up with proof. Like the claim that EVE will die if CCP doesnt turn it into carebear land.
And yes I believe that if you dont afk while mining your chances of avoiding being ganked increase alot. The problem here is not that you can gank miners in highsec. The problem is that miners do not take steps to protect themselves as other professions do. They believe that they should be able to do their thing in peace even if all of EVE was burning down around them. That is not how it works. Miners should not make the game adapt to them, they must adapt to the game.
And I find it funny when you claim that miners cannot play the game at its current state when all the highsec fields are crawling with mining ships. More proof that you are making things up to manipulate people into believing that the game should change to fit your needs.
Also I am now convinced that your flawed viewpoint has run out of arguments. I cannot think of another reason why you would try to insult my intelligence.
|

Vricrolatious
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 00:03:00 -
[147] - Quote
Henry Haphorn wrote:The Apostle wrote:Vricrolatious wrote:Honestly, the best advise I could give to someone that wants to mine and be safe... join a decent nullsec alliance and move out of empire. I've mined (I'm not afraid to admit it) in High, Low and Nullsec and mining in Nullsec was probably the safest I've been when it came to mining. The best belts need to be scanned down, which means the reds and neutrals need probes to find you and that gives you extra time to warp to a POS and safe up before they find you and make veldspar dust out of you.
As perverse as it is for me to agree with a Goon this is perfectly true and may well prove to a consequence of continued highssec ganking. Better the known enemy. But it may cause issues for Eve as a whole because to mine for Alliance X and sell to Alliance Y could well be seen as treason. There may be alliance embargoes about selling rocks on the open market, in addition to alliances themselves putting the squeeze on miners profits through ridiculous refining percentages. This will become a very serious inflation issue if the rumour about Drone mineral drops are also true. Thus, another reason why I left Majesta Empire.
Yeah, it does matter what alliance (or even the corp in the alliance) policies are, but if you know what you want, it shouldn't be an issue finding a home that fits your needs / wants. I can't speak for Goon Indy Policies or even my own corp's (not sure we have any at the moment, lol) since I haven't mined since WIDot became WICorp and joined Goons, but... WIDot had a few programs for buying minerals and in some cases the corps had programs as well (my former home, SSRG, did) and the prices for buying minerals were close to Jita prices, so it was a good deal. From what I've seen though, as long as you're not selling Super Caps outside Alliance and friends, we don't much care what you do with that ore once you've mined it. I could, of course, be wrong, but I've seen nothing that states otherwise during my time with Goons and WICorp.
WIDot, Best Dot, Even Sans Dot! -Vric |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
60
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 00:04:00 -
[148] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Anyone who seriously mines in highsec deserves to be ganked. As a miner you could easily get accepted into any renter alliance or nullsec alliance that has a Indy Corp. You could then site in hidden belts mining ABC ore making 10x what you do in highsec. Most corporations will buy your ore close to Jita price and even if it is lower its still more then you make in highsec. Added to the fact that you are surrounded by intel channels and have a clear idea of who is hostile or not. Lastly as a miner you generally aren't really expected to do much other then maybe a mining Op 1-2 times a week.
Not exactly. You are ignoring the fact that renter alliances and null sec alliances tend to treat miners like crap. Miners are generally regarded as extra firepower that can be used as cannon fodder when needed. CTAs are common, some mining ops tend to force miners to mine for free, the list goes on. It is true one can make profit in null sec, but the action is minimal in terms of how often you get attacked unless you mine near a contested system. |

Aida Nu
Nu Industries
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 00:06:00 -
[149] - Quote
Hauling Hal wrote:As I said in another thread, the miners and mission runners that you despise so much make up the majority of the players, so your 'HTFU or GTFO' comment is a little naive, as you'd soon get very bored with noone to shoot and a game that is no longer financially viable to develop any further. Ironically, this means that the gankers are parasites, living off the efforts of their hosts. A perfectly acceptable game mechanic, but please don't cry when CCP try not to let you kill their game by driving the majority of the players away. The 'hard core' players don't get the 'game' concept as much as the PvE players don't get the 'gank' concept. The hard core players are either trying to win at a MMO (well, DUH!) or trying to make RL money out of it, whilst everyone else is just playing a game: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/online_gaming
Feel free to back up your claim that the majority of EVE-¦s players are highsec hugging carebears that only do missions and mining and nothing else. If you do not have the numbers feel free to stfu. |

Skunk Gracklaw
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
545
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 00:15:00 -
[150] - Quote
Aida Nu wrote:Hauling Hal wrote:As I said in another thread, the miners and mission runners that you despise so much make up the majority of the players, so your 'HTFU or GTFO' comment is a little naive, as you'd soon get very bored with noone to shoot and a game that is no longer financially viable to develop any further. Ironically, this means that the gankers are parasites, living off the efforts of their hosts. A perfectly acceptable game mechanic, but please don't cry when CCP try not to let you kill their game by driving the majority of the players away. The 'hard core' players don't get the 'game' concept as much as the PvE players don't get the 'gank' concept. The hard core players are either trying to win at a MMO (well, DUH!) or trying to make RL money out of it, whilst everyone else is just playing a game: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/online_gaming Feel free to back up your claim that the majority of EVE-¦s players are highsec hugging carebears that only do missions and mining and nothing else. If you do not have the numbers stfu. Even if he's right and the high sec carebears outnumber everybody else it doesn't mean that CCP should drastically change their game to make them more secure. That would have a much worse effect on the game than anything we (Goons) do.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |