Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Captain Africa
GRIM MARCH
59
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 06:35:00 -
[181] - Quote
Rhes wrote:blue dehazon wrote:Second expansion whid more nerf to hi sec,whis i newer trained all may acconts and som alts for PI.nowe custom office will be the new pirat tool,pirat probe to steal your stuff in pos more pirat stuff.CCP neglect a larg part of the player base in hisec.Cool whit som neew ships but thats it. Highsec POCOs are for Goons.
Then you better get your Dust side sorted lol |
Warde Guildencrantz
TunDraGon
901
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 06:42:00 -
[182] - Quote
I really appreciate the warp speed feature change. In any game i play i gravitate towards the fastest 'class' available, mainly a preference but also because speed increases both offensive and defensive ability, but only when used skillfully. In eve tackling and speed based roles are under represented, for example, my corporation found it odd that i would request to fly a very fast dual prop interception style armor cruiser in a hac fleet. When I demonstrated that quick ships can secure more kills than longer distance tackle modules, the interception cruiser became a specialized role in the fleet. Its great that ccp is reinforcing this playstyle because it is fun to be a part of.
Question though, is warp speed going to be static, or will it change based on mass/max velocity of your ship?
If it doesnt change based on mass or max velocity and is simply an arbitrary assigned value, will it be increased via any modules? Will warp velocity optimizer rigs increase acceleration in warp? Will the t3 warp speed subsystems make them warp awesomely fast?
|
Roime
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
3497
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 06:43:00 -
[183] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Scythi Magellen wrote:Of course I'm also still waiting for the station to let us walk around - its dull sitting on a couch wondering if the crap engineers will ever fix that pesky airlock problem behind the door... Remember Incarna? Incarna almost destroyed the entire game. We should be trying to forget it ever happened.
No, Incarna didn't almost destroy anything. Overreacting, hysteric herdmental basement dwellers with entitlement issues gone full ****** is what almost destroyed the game, luckily all they achieved was a broken pixel statue.
Seriously,we won't be bringing back the old unique ships for events. We might give other stuff away that is interesting, but no Guardian Vexor, Opux Luxury Yacht, Fedthron, Impoc, SIR, etc, etc.-á |
Skia Aumer
Atlas Research Group Gatekeepers Universe
61
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 06:49:00 -
[184] - Quote
ginsu gnife wrote:As someone who has played this game for a very long time, I appreciate what ccp is trying to do. .... all the people over reacting need to calm down. Low sec is running just fine with player owned customs offices. Exactly! They are fine now, but they're going to be royally nerfed!
I used to have a very good and profitable profession of re-processing low-tier PI materials into high-tier. But that involved some work and dedication as well, because all of the profit would have disappeared if I did it in hisec, due to tax. What they are suggesting now is - load a freighter in Jita - run a couple of jumps away to you POCO - reprocess - run a couple of jumps back - PROFIT!
No risk, no efforts, just pure boredom of clickfest.
So I dont see any good in that "feature". Instead, it removes a good portion of gameplay, and does not create any new contents. There are way too many planets in hisec, there will not be any competition whatsoever. |
Captain Africa
GRIM MARCH
59
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 06:53:00 -
[185] - Quote
POCOS ....watch this space ... https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=243156 |
Warde Guildencrantz
TunDraGon
901
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 07:03:00 -
[186] - Quote
Roime wrote:Rhes wrote:Scythi Magellen wrote:Of course I'm also still waiting for the station to let us walk around - its dull sitting on a couch wondering if the crap engineers will ever fix that pesky airlock problem behind the door... Remember Incarna? Incarna almost destroyed the entire game. We should be trying to forget it ever happened. No, Incarna didn't almost destroy anything. Overreacting, hysteric herdmental basement dwellers with entitlement issues gone full ****** is what almost destroyed the game, luckily all they achieved was a broken pixel statue. Considering the state of ship balance (ie no balance) when incarna was released, i think the community response was more than justified. Ccp is in a better state currently but dont have the resources to put together meaningful avatar gameplay. |
Skia Aumer
Atlas Research Group Gatekeepers Universe
61
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 07:03:00 -
[187] - Quote
Intead, they should have done it vice versa. ALL of the industry in hisec should be havily taxed. You want to make a 800mm autocannon? Sure, just get the 3 mil worth of minerals and pay 3 mil for renting a production slot at NPC station. THAT would be a massive boost to industry in player-controlled space, which is nullsec and WH.
Or just let us kill CONCORD. |
Captain Africa
GRIM MARCH
59
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 07:23:00 -
[188] - Quote
The link between Eve and Dust are crucial , especially now where Dust is at a critical level. Dust needs to be a household name in Eve . I can think of no better way than POCO conflict to create this link and promote a deeper level of game play in New Eden. CCP do it ! |
raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
137
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 07:25:00 -
[189] - Quote
Roime wrote:Rhes wrote: Incarna almost destroyed the entire game. We should be trying to forget it ever happened.
No, Incarna didn't almost destroy anything. Overreacting, hysteric herdmental basement dwellers with entitlement issues gone full ****** is what almost destroyed the game, luckily all they achieved was a broken pixel statue.
Lol +1 |
AspiB'elt
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 07:30:00 -
[190] - Quote
Also CCP :
What is the news about :
Tracking disruptor ( malus on missile) . Rebalancing pirate ship (Frigate , cruiser , BS). Lens ( less range possibility but two lens in the same range with damage split beetween EM and thermal 80% 20% and 20% 80%) Alliance taxe on the transaction (market etc ...) Revamp POS.
Have you some plan on Rubicon about this subject. |
|
marVLs
418
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 07:53:00 -
[191] - Quote
Im disappointed... it's not an expansion, it's just patch. To call it expansion it should have more stuff.
Only thing that saves it from being terrible to just "meeh" are those SOE ships, and only because they look so incredible cool.
CCP why You taking some new directions without fixing first the old stuf
Another disturbing thing is that from several expansions each of them is getting less and less content...
Even main themes of expansions starts to have almost no new content like Odyssey. |
I Love Boobies
All Hail Boobies
592
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:03:00 -
[192] - Quote
You know how much trolling we will be able to do with those siphons? Especially if they can be used in high sec where you don't have to worry about guns so much. *removed inappropriate signature* - CCP Eterne |
Anthony Blunt
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:09:00 -
[193] - Quote
Henriette Malia Alette wrote:
Seriously.. if u really are tired of us players, that seeks the PVE, a more relaxing or different approach then PVP of any sort - why not simply make that statement in a nice CCP blog, and be done with it... and we can take our hats and go..
Some of the stuff coming in Rubicon - is nice.. but once u start reading between the lines - if u cant see that this is a path leading to turning all of EVE into NS.. well..
You just have to look at the historical event that gives this expansion its name "Rubicon" With the crossing of the Rubicon Julius Caesar Crossed with a Token army into Italy Proper. This was the starting point of the civil wars in Italy which ended with the Foundation of the empire and the end of the republic.
CCP claims the "capsuleers will be seizing power from the empire" and attempts to beguile us with an image of the crossing of the Rubicon as the beginning of a journey into new spaces. This is not the true This is the Foundation of the empire, focussed inwards towards highsec..
My best advice for those high sec dwellers who do not wish to be a part of the New Empire is to follow the lead of of the Senate and Flee Rome.. I am not my main, just a blunt instrument. |
Ilaister
Task Force Proteus Protean Concept
10
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:15:00 -
[194] - Quote
POCOS in Highsec
Pew happening right infront of carebears' eyes. Not their barge going flash/bang, not a grim tide of catalysts fleetwarping to their freighter, a timer that they can form for, hire mercs for, call friends for. You know, a conflict driver.
If the CFC or whoever decides it's worth their time to grind them for tears then their whining over the Null Sov mechanics - where they can use their superlative structure bashing tools, where there are far fewer targets and the rewards are far greater - is so much hot air.... I doubt this. Very much. +1
Deployable Structures
Affects my corp's gameplay little. More tools for us to play with though, and the basis of something the playerbase has been crying out for for for an age. Bypassing the POS spaghetticode instead of a rework? Fine, but I hope they're quick about it. +1
Ship Rebalancing
More winsauce from ex-players who iterate extremely responsively to player concerns about their work. Not perfect now? Maybe not. But better all the time. +1
New Ships
Sexy as all hell - in form aswell as function. Vague on the function part though... why so early in their development if they form part of a Winter expansion that is being deployed early...? Don't really care. Just give me several. +10
Certs by Any Other Name
Whatever. Get noobs, retain noobs, get them flying their PvP ships better faster so there are more targets to shoot at however you feel necessary. 0_0
CCP seems to be driving at a lot of things we all want. They are doing so without promising jam tomorrow, and failing to deliver, or burning out their devs.
The lack of new content, especially in W-space, where there is a total lack of any kind of conflict driver, is saddening. And still no T3 sub swaps at POSes....
But one thing at a time no? |
Maliandra
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:18:00 -
[195] - Quote
Well there is a fundamental problem to this idea: It draws more people into hi-sec.
I'm sorry, but isn't hi-sec kind of an issue right now? The expansions to this game should be motivating us to LEAVE hi-sec.
Bleh, CCP logic for ya. |
Wyn Pharoh
Licentia Ex Vereor Black Core Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:19:00 -
[196] - Quote
Deployable Automatic tractor beam and looting device
Interesting isk/hr accelerator for every entity in Eve NOT living in Drone Regions.
CCP, please get busy adding loot drops back to Drone regions, or increase bounties again to compensate for the absolute waste of time it is now to wreck out anything in drone space. This new deployable structure will have only the most marginal of values, if really any at all, for an entire quadrant of space that already suffers from a variety of ills that were once partially compensated by the unique drone drop mechanics.
Unaddressed, I really see this as yet another nerf to Drones, further deepening the value gap between these regions and anywhere else in Eve.
|
Rhivre
TarNec Invisible Exchequer
432
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:19:00 -
[197] - Quote
marVLs wrote:Im disappointed... it's not an expansion, it's just patch. To call it expansion it should have more stuff. Only thing that saves it from being terrible to just "meeh" are those SOE ships, and only because they look so incredible cool. CCP why You taking some new directions without fixing first the old stuf Another disturbing thing is that from several expansions each of them is getting less and less content... Even main themes of expansions starts to have almost no new content like Odyssey.
No stuff?
I have played -ú40 expansions in other games with less new stuff.
What you actually mean is "I did not get stuff that I wanted" |
Frank Maulerant
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:23:00 -
[198] - Quote
Rhes wrote: WiS is currently a single room with a couch. Dust is a failing console shooter. Neither of them have anything to do with Eve Online.
Actually it is. WiS was promised to be made in Incarna update. And the mechanics of quarters,station's locations and minigames was shown on a fanfest. (Still remember the "station square" and that bar with board mini-game)
But as a result,we only have the captains quarters.
Hope i've made that clear. Cheers. |
Ilaister
Task Force Proteus Protean Concept
10
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:26:00 -
[199] - Quote
Wyn Pharoh wrote:Deployable Automatic tractor beam and looting device
Interesting isk/hr accelerator for every entity in Eve NOT living in Drone Regions.
CCP, please get busy adding loot drops back to Drone regions, or increase bounties again to compensate for the absolute waste of time it is now to wreck out anything in drone space. This new deployable structure will have only the most marginal of values, if really any at all, for an entire quadrant of space that already suffers from a variety of ills that were once partially compensated by the unique drone drop mechanics.
Unaddressed, I really see this as yet another nerf to Drones, further deepening the value gap between these regions and anywhere else in Eve.
If all you care about is ISK/hr then you deserve to live in that wasteland.
|
Captain Africa
GRIM MARCH
59
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:28:00 -
[200] - Quote
Ilaister wrote:POCOS in Highsec
Pew happening right infront of carebears' eyes. Not their barge going flash/bang, not a grim tide of catalysts fleetwarping to their freighter, a timer that they can form for, hire mercs for, call friends for. You know, a conflict driver.
If the CFC or whoever decides it's worth their time to grind them for tears then their whining over the Null Sov mechanics - where they can use their superlative structure bashing tools, where there are far fewer targets and the rewards are far greater - is so much hot air.... I doubt this. Very much. +1
You Sir get's it ....The conflict will be on a smaller scale where the rules are different. As an eve player you will feel like a Demi God ..Large and in Charge :) . So stop over reacting about high sec its going to be a blast lol.
Btw this will not be about big ass alliances....and if it becomes "there are a few new kids on the block to recon with". |
|
Lugalbandak
Anunnaku Industrial Corp. Northern Associates.
135
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:32:00 -
[201] - Quote
Looks good ccp The police horse is the only animal in the world that haz his male genitals on his back |
Frank Maulerant
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:37:00 -
[202] - Quote
Still,not really clear about depots and siphon units.
- Depots will be a personal access-only,or you can grant the access rights to someone (or it's even open to everyone? 0_o) - How much m3 will it take in packed state...and where can it be anchored (any rules to it,like to poses and outposts?) - sigh,just to clarify - it will work like a few pos modules melded in one? or you can even dock your pod into it? - And,yeah...what kind of resources will siphons be stealing? Guess that needs a clarification,because hi-sec researchers can start pissing with boiling water when it will turn out,that siphon can get labs and hangars contents (stolen cap BPO's....Chuck yeah ) |
Treborr MintingtonJr
The Knights of Spamalot The Methodical Alliance
13
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:42:00 -
[203] - Quote
Anyone else thirsty after reading this? http://www.rubiconexotic.com/
Also intrigued by this --> "Guerilla-style Warfare Support" |
Lephia DeGrande
Luxembourg Space Union
146
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:44:00 -
[204] - Quote
New Stuff! Yeah! |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1344
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:47:00 -
[205] - Quote
Noi lek wrote:When will we get ambulation?
With any luck, not before 2113. This is not a signature. |
Teinyhr
A Club for Reputable Gentlemen
231
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:48:00 -
[206] - Quote
This and probably coming expansions in the next few years in a nutshell:
"We are giving goons and other major null alliances,more ways to grief casual players and we are nerfing high sec to the ground in the process."
Nevermind that casual players are the cash cow of just about every MMO out there.
Last one out please turn off the lights. |
Wyn Pharoh
Licentia Ex Vereor Black Core Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:49:00 -
[207] - Quote
Ilaister wrote:Wyn Pharoh wrote:Deployable Automatic tractor beam and looting device
Interesting isk/hr accelerator for every entity in Eve NOT living in Drone Regions.
CCP, please get busy adding loot drops back to Drone regions, or increase bounties again to compensate for the absolute waste of time it is now to wreck out anything in drone space. This new deployable structure will have only the most marginal of values, if really any at all, for an entire quadrant of space that already suffers from a variety of ills that were once partially compensated by the unique drone drop mechanics.
Unaddressed, I really see this as yet another nerf to Drones, further deepening the value gap between these regions and anywhere else in Eve.
If all you care about is ISK/hr then you deserve to live in that wasteland.
At what point did I say anything about caring only about isk/hr? This expansion has a lot of interesting content and I'm not even complaining about the structure I referenced in itself. I am trying to point out that one of the new features of this next expansion will be practically useless in one of the most 'already useless' parts of New Eden. Bringing loot drops back to Drones should be done, now more than ever, considering that 1 out of 4 of the new deployable toys coming in Rubicon will be rubbish otherwise for anyone in Drone space. |
River Olaf
Perca Resources
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 08:54:00 -
[208] - Quote
"How CCP **** you over by claiming re-designs are New Features and good things in their next "Free" if you plex or if you pay monthly -ú60 every 6 months expansion."
So far, the new "features" are so far...
Control Hi-Sec Customs Offices - So making a current items destructible in high sec now and calling it a new feature
Deploy Mobile Structures - So...personal POCOs....fun
Sisters of EVE Faction Ships - GAME BREAKING EXPLORATION SHIPS!
Ship Re-balancing - Still calling these things a new "feature" in their "expansions"....amazing - Interdictors, don't need changing they work fine - Interceptors, see above - Mauraders, why bother when a BS(Domi) does the same job in high sec missions fine? or is it just to keep justifying peoples jobs at CCP that you have to give them something to do?
Guerilla-style Warfare Support - So what POCOs were meant to be when they came out then? how did that work out?
Interbus Ship Identification System - UI change for newbs
And a speech from the Senior Producer, begging players to "see their vision", in other words, we know this is a disappointing expansion...please stick with us, we'll have some new ideas soon...promise...
Brilliant |
Philpip
T.R.I.A.D
88
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 09:01:00 -
[209] - Quote
Sorry if this has been asked (can't read all 11 pages, I am supposed to be working after all) but what are the requirements going to be for deploying a poco?
I am assuming it will be the same as a pos with faction standings? |
Skia Aumer
Atlas Research Group Gatekeepers Universe
61
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 09:14:00 -
[210] - Quote
Maliandra wrote:The expansions to this game should be motivating us to LEAVE hi-sec. Not sure if that should be the purpose of each and every expansion, but nullsec is lackluster for sure and nerfing it further is a serious mistake. +1
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |