| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 32 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Kelsi Corynn
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
5
   |
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:26:00 -
[31] - Quote
Interesting. Nice catch.
Will have minimal impact if any on strategic suicide ganking, so I see no harm done to EVE's soul. |
Skorpynekomimi
E.A.D Alliance
Omega Vector
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:27:00 -
[32] - Quote
This makes ganking mining barges a little less profitable, and bigger targets a chunk less.
I hope they go the whole way, and remove insurance completely. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1201
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:29:00 -
[33] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:troll. So we can safely say that you agree, seeing as how you can't muster even the slightest shred of an argument.
Thank you for your support.
GÇöGÇöGÇö
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
GÇö Karath Piki-á |
Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries
Bloodbound.
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:31:00 -
[34] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Desert Ice78 wrote:troll. So we can safely say that you agree, seeing as how you can't muster even the slightest shred of an argument. Thank you for your support.
still trolling.
I am a pod pilot:
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1201
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:33:00 -
[35] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:still trolling. You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
Anyway, we can still safely say that you agree, seeing as how you still can't muster even the slightest shred of an argument.
Thank you for your continued support.
GÇöGÇöGÇö
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
GÇö Karath Piki-á |
Large Collidable Object
morons.
525
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:37:00 -
[36] - Quote
Skorpynekomimi wrote:
I hope they go the whole way, and remove insurance completely.
+1
on a side note,: Tippia just got successfully trolled with one of the oldest troll attempts on the interwebs, which is repeatedly just posting 'troll'.
morons-áare recruiting. We're good at breeding! |
Avila Cracko
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
70
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:39:00 -
[37] - Quote
if this is true...
thnx CCP a lot... thnx for making this game (at least little) logical...
and thnx for helping ours "elite pvpers" (read suicide gankers) to grow themselfs a balls... maybe... if they decide to find a target that can defend itself... |
Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
345
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:39:00 -
[38] - Quote
Tippia wrote: Which police force teleports to the scene of the crime, automatically knows who did it, and then instantly kills almost everyone involved?
The same type that takes the Murder Weapon out of your hand slaps your wrist and says that if you do that again 8 or 9 more times we get serious. Unless you rat in Null Sec of course, then your fine.
We have some lazy a$$ magic Cops. |
Russell Casey
One Ton
Reverberation Project
62
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:39:00 -
[39] - Quote
One time I shot an NPC merchant outside a station---got blown up by sentry guns. Only after my insurance was paid did I bother to see who the aggro countdown was for.
It was Pend Insurance. |
SilentSkills
Estrale Frontiers
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:42:00 -
[40] - Quote
It wont affect suicide ganking much, a thorax is pretty cheap, and destroyers got buffed. |
|
|
Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
345
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:45:00 -
[41] - Quote
SilentSkills wrote:It wont affect suicide ganking much, a thorax is pretty cheap, and destroyers got buffed.
Really this. The only change is less Solo Arty Battleships and more teams of smaller attack ships.
It is part of EVE's new group content. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1202
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:46:00 -
[42] - Quote
Avila Cracko wrote:if this is true...
thnx CCP a lot... thnx for making this game (at least little) less logical...
and thnx for helping ours "elite pvpers" (read suicide gankers) to grow themselfs a balls letting haulers be even more pants-on-head retarded without suffering any consequences... Fixed. 
Alara IonStorm wrote:[The same type that takes the Murder Weapon out of your hand slaps your wrist and says that if you do that again 8 or 9 more times we get serious. No, that's basically the only sensible and non-magical part of CONCORD.
GÇöGÇöGÇö
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
GÇö Karath Piki-á |
Cpt Fina
The Tuskers
73
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:47:00 -
[43] - Quote
Terrible change.
CCPs dogma "No space is safe" is only true aslong as nobody is complaining about it on the forums. |
Igualmentedos
Shadow Veil Industrial
Shadow Directive
54
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:48:00 -
[44] - Quote
I approve! Now if you want to gank a high value target you have to pay the price. |
Igualmentedos
Shadow Veil Industrial
Shadow Directive
54
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:49:00 -
[45] - Quote
Cpt Fina wrote:Terrible change.
CCPs dogma "No space is safe" is only true aslong as nobody is complaining about it on the forums.
High sec isn't completely safe. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1202
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:51:00 -
[46] - Quote
Igualmentedos wrote:High sec isn't completely safe. It pretty much was before this, and this change GÇö if intentional GÇö inches it even closer, which is the wrong way to go.
Highsec needs to be made more unsafe, not less.
GÇöGÇöGÇö
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
GÇö Karath Piki-á |
Igualmentedos
Shadow Veil Industrial
Shadow Directive
54
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:51:00 -
[47] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Selinate wrote:If you find someone floating around in space with a ton of expensive stuff in their cargo hold and want to suicide gank them, fine, but you really shouldn't get the majority of the isk loss from your lost ship back also... It's rather one-sided in favor of the suicide gankers in that case. It's only one-sided if the victim chooses to make it one-sided by not equipping his ship properly, by not flying it properly, and by not enforcing the consequences on the aggressor.
Even a ship fit and flown properly isn't invincible.
|
DarkAegix
Blue Republic
RvB - BLUE Republic
229
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:51:00 -
[48] - Quote
Excellent, now New Eden makes a little bit more logical sense. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1202
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:53:00 -
[49] - Quote
Igualmentedos wrote:Even a ship fit and flown properly isn't invincible. Against ganks, it most certainly is.
DarkAegix wrote:Excellent, now New Eden makes a little bit more logical sense. So you're in favour of removing CONCORD, presumably?
GÇöGÇöGÇö
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
GÇö Karath Piki-á |
Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
345
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:54:00 -
[50] - Quote
Tippia wrote:No, that's basically the only sensible and non-magical part of CONCORD.
I am gonna go a head and doubt that letting every Killer have free reign in the space they killed is the most sensible thing about them.
Sensible would be coordinating off the wreck setting the perp to -5 and sending him on his way out the door. I am sure Suicide Ganking would go down quite a bit. Which is exactly what the Police would want.
But that would be a lot less fun then smoking some dudes Barge in a Rax.
|
|
|
Igualmentedos
Shadow Veil Industrial
Shadow Directive
54
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:54:00 -
[51] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Igualmentedos wrote:High sec isn't completely safe. It pretty much was before this, and this change GÇö if intentional GÇö inches it even closer, which is the wrong way to go. Highsec needs to be made more unsafe, not less.
In this current situation it was the right choice to make.
If I want to kill a specific person in high security space I just have to catch him in space and kill him. This hasn't changed. CCP has only balanced the risk and reward.
I would high five CCP if players get the ability to gank other players in incarna.  That would rock. |
Selinate
81
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:55:00 -
[52] - Quote
Desert Ice78 wrote:Tippia wrote:Desert Ice78 wrote:troll. So we can safely say that you agree, seeing as how you can't muster even the slightest shred of an argument. Thank you for your support. still trolling.
you're not the first to come to this conclusion. |
Igualmentedos
Shadow Veil Industrial
Shadow Directive
54
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:56:00 -
[53] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Igualmentedos wrote:Even a ship fit and flown properly isn't invincible. Against ganks, it most certainly is. DarkAegix wrote:Excellent, now New Eden makes a little bit more logical sense. So you're in favour of removing CONCORD, presumably?
in-+vin-+ci-+ble
adj.
Incapable of being overcome or defeated; unconquerable.
Say whaaaaaaat? |
Cpt Fina
The Tuskers
73
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:58:00 -
[54] - Quote
Igualmentedos wrote:Cpt Fina wrote:Terrible change.
CCPs dogma "No space is safe" is only true aslong as nobody is complaining about it on the forums. High sec isn't completely safe.
Point is that CCP is willingly bending over and taking it in the rear when they constantly give in to the preassure from the playerbase and changes what is seen as truisms of the game.
What are principles good for if you abandom them when things get rough?
Eve online is a special, unique MMORPG to the enxtent that we the playerbase allows it to be... and that's bullshit.
What's next GÇô instanced missions or PvP arenas. PvP flags maybe? |
DarkAegix
Blue Republic
RvB - BLUE Republic
229
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:59:00 -
[55] - Quote
Tippia wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Excellent, now New Eden makes a little bit more logical sense. So you're in favour of removing CONCORD, presumably?
And you must be in tears, presumably? |
Stealing Honest
Stealing Honest Speculation Group LLC
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 00:00:00 -
[56] - Quote
People dont need insurance to gank. It's just a crutch.
Don't let your game be determined by a crutch.
SH |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1202
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 00:00:00 -
[57] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:I am gonna go a head and doubt that letting every Killer have free reign in the space they killed is the most sensible thing about them. GÇ£SensibleGÇ¥ in the sense of GÇ£makes senseGÇ¥ GÇö the same kind of making sense that fuels the argument to remove insurance for CONCORD kills.
Igualmentedos wrote:In this current situation it was the right choice to make.
If I want to kill a specific person in high security space I just have to catch him in space and kill him. This hasn't changed. CCP has only balanced the risk and reward. Not really, no. They've reduced the risk for people who already had next to none, and have not affected the risk of the other party. Above all, they've made highsec a bit safer, which is the wrong choice to make in the current situation, considering how ridiculously safe it already is (and how much safer they've already made it with their ill-conceived policy change).
Selinate wrote:you're not the first to come to this conclusion. He certainly shows how easy it is to be wrong, yes. Well, that, or how easy it is to misunderstand something as simple as a five-letter word.
DarkAegix wrote:And you must be in tears, presumably? No. Why would I be?
I'm just exasperated by CCP's decision to make highsec safer when the exact opposite needs to happen.
GÇöGÇöGÇö
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
GÇö Karath Piki-á |
Max Von Sydow
Droneboat Diplomacy
29
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 00:00:00 -
[58] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Tippia wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Excellent, now New Eden makes a little bit more logical sense. So you're in favour of removing CONCORD, presumably? And you must be in tears, presumably?
Delicious Tippia tears. |
Dondoran
Free Masons United Inc.
Fidelas Constans
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 00:02:00 -
[59] - Quote
This is truly a great idea gankers not getting nearly free ships to grief the innocent with , imagine that. Anything that hurts that kind of game play is only going to have positive effects on the rest of eve.
What looked like the biggest buff to suicide ganking now has balance, excellent job CCP.
|
Igualmentedos
Shadow Veil Industrial
Shadow Directive
54
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 00:03:00 -
[60] - Quote
Max Von Sydow wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Tippia wrote:DarkAegix wrote:Excellent, now New Eden makes a little bit more logical sense. So you're in favour of removing CONCORD, presumably? And you must be in tears, presumably? Delicious Tippia tears.
BEST tears! 
-Can we call them Tt's from now on? |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 32 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |