Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Gimme more Cynos
Du nervst geh sterben
132
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 00:15:00 -
[91] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote: Last, we could have tried to make the Nestor powerful enough to justify the huge price-tag. We really didn't want to go with this option....
Rise, you should rephrase that sentence... :D
Anyway, +1 for the change. Makes a lot of sense. |

Utremi Fasolasi
La Dolce Vita
360
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 00:16:00 -
[92] - Quote
Medalyn Isis wrote:Why exactly would rogue drones drop BPC's for sisters of eve ships? That makes very little sense to me. It just seems like a quick hatchet job because you messed up. Usually I have a lot of respect for CCP Rise's ideas, but this one is bad. I would say go back to the drawing board and think of a more logical solution, although as the idea has got this far already I don't think that will now happen.
Try reading it again.. he said they will drop chips that you can cash in at SOE LP stores fpr the BPCs. Not that the RDs would drop BPCs. |

Theodoric Darkwind
PonyWaffe Insidious Empire
304
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 00:22:00 -
[93] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Oh, and Rise, another thing.
Way to go on letting market forces dictate economic costs. Nice to see you let the game be a "sandbox", as you so like to say, except when you want to help out a null sec area, and nerf the **** out of another high sec income stream.
Highsec needs fewer isk faucets, and nullsec needs more income sources for individual pilots. Drone regions are especially bad, you basically rat in anoms or mine, that's the only choices for drone region dwellers, and lets not forget how horribly designed drone hordes are. The exploration sites are worthless, and there are no gas sites.
|

chez1962
The 20th Legion Mildly Sober
12
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 00:24:00 -
[94] - Quote
pandemic legion-withdrawing-to-the-drone-regions this was on the 30th and now ccp helps them to recover from there major losses  
I wonder who gets a next boost on losses ... CFC    |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1028
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 00:43:00 -
[95] - Quote
Theodoric Darkwind wrote:
Highsec needs fewer isk faucets, and nullsec needs more income sources for individual pilots. Drone regions are especially bad, you basically rat in anoms or mine, that's the only choices for drone region dwellers, and lets not forget how horribly designed drone hordes are. The exploration sites are worthless, and there are no gas sites.
High Sec is not a large isk faucet. In fact it is probably one of the lowest Isk Faucet regions in the game. The largest Isk Faucet is Null as of Fanfest 2013 figures.
The rest of your statement, sure, more variety, more pilots supported and more drone region love, all agree with. |

Omega Flames
Forever Winter
89
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 01:59:00 -
[96] - Quote
Why not just drop the actual BPC's instead of tags? and if you must drop tags at least have SOE in their name not rogue drones so people easily recognize their use and don't have to go digging around trying to figure it out what some random drone tag is for. <Munnkeh> i'm gonna use that excuse if i ever kill someone. "look, if you keep meeting ppl, it's bound to happen eventually" http://i.imgur.com/76pQ9.jpg |

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
2009
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 02:14:00 -
[97] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Dersen Lowery wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:I just read Grath's confirmation of PL evac'ing to the Drone Regions. Remarkably convenient for PL that Rise decides to gift the Drone Regions, and screw high sec. Confirming that Nestcats are on track to replace Slowcats. Nah, but PL pilots will be soon be going ka-ching with every Sentient Drone drop. The individual and alliance coffers will soon be brimming again. But makes you wonder, whatever happened to all that rental income in the first place. If the BOTLrd agreement was designed to protect PL's income streams, where is that all that ISK that they have been collecting so far?
Is this guy for real?
Surely noone is this unbearably thick? Must be a troll. BYDI recruitment closed-ish |

Petrified
Old and Petrified Syndication TOG - The Older Gamers Alliance
54
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 02:18:00 -
[98] - Quote
This is good to hear. While grinding out for a Nestor for resale was nice, it would be nicer to fly it once it is fiscally piratical to fly.
Also good for the people who like shooting drones... regardless of where.
Now, how many of each chips for the ships? |

Sieges
51
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 02:44:00 -
[99] - Quote
This is good news :) |

Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
2858
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 03:42:00 -
[100] - Quote
It doesn't really matter what is done with regards to cost at this point; the Nestor is the EVE equivalent of the "Spruce Goose". As has been previously pointed out, it's really only worth $500 to $600-million ISK based on capabilities. It's certainly not worth more than a Vindicator or Machariel, and no amount of blueprint drops is going to offset this. With the ability to run a Covert Ops cloak it would be worth around a billion. Strangely enough, since the Nestor was designed for Wormhole use - it seems like a huge oversight.
I really don't know what the big deal is - give Black Ops Covert Ops capability and it's a non-issue. Black Ops have a substantial number of other features and advantages that make them unique enough even with the addition of Covert Ops cloaking capability. With the recent changes battleships have basically been relegated to 'fleet duty' anyway, so introducing the ability for some of these to fill the "solo PvP roam" niche wouldn't necessarily be a bad idea. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |
|

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
1226
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 04:07:00 -
[101] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:It doesn't really matter what is done with regards to cost at this point; the Nestor is the EVE equivalent of the "Spruce Goose". As has been previously pointed out, it's really only worth $500 to $600-million ISK based on current capabilities. It's certainly not worth more than a Vindicator or Machariel, and no amount of blueprint drops is going to offset this. With the ability to run a Covert Ops cloak it would be worth a small premium.
CCP Rise, just give the Nestor a Covert Ops cloak and be done with it. This ship was designed for wormhole play, and wormhole players really haven't been given much - so throw them a bone already... The Nestor is cost-prohibitive to the point where I can't see it being massive used in fleet actions, but if so - who cares?
Covert Ops on a battleship ha ha ha ha ha The Tears Must Flow |

Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
2858
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 04:50:00 -
[102] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Covert Ops on a battleship ha ha ha ha ha Why? How many battleships do you see on solo roams... I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1032
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 05:53:00 -
[103] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:
Covert Ops on a battleship ha ha ha ha ha
Everyone claims it would be broken, yet we have never seen one in action. Given their slow align, slow lock times before cloak, and slow warp, I don't think it would actually be that much of an issue. Cloaky T3's haven't broken the game despite having near BS tanks (When talking about a Blops tank equivalent) & DPS. It's not like we are talking about a cloaking Vindi. |

Destoya
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
234
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 06:27:00 -
[104] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:
Covert Ops on a battleship ha ha ha ha ha
Everyone claims it would be broken, yet we have never seen one in action. Given their slow align, slow lock times before cloak, and slow warp, I don't think it would actually be that much of an issue. Cloaky T3's haven't broken the game despite having near BS tanks (When talking about a Blops tank equivalent) & DPS. It's not like we are talking about a cloaking Vindi.
I think you'll see CCP's opinion on cloaky T3's and T3's in general and their relative balance compared to other ships fairly soon.
|

Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
2858
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 07:03:00 -
[105] - Quote
Destoya wrote:I think you'll see CCP's opinion on cloaky T3's and T3's in general and their relative balance compared to other ships fairly soon. YeahGǪ None of us are looking forward to that. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1034
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 07:04:00 -
[106] - Quote
Destoya wrote:
I think you'll see CCP's opinion on cloaky T3's and T3's in general and their relative balance compared to other ships fairly soon.
Actually I'm pretty sure Cloaky T3's won't see very much of a nerf. The Super Tanky DPS T3 setup will see a Nerf for sure. And some other T3 area's will get a substantial buff. But Cloaky T3's slot in fairly well alongside the other T2 Cloakies. |

Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
2859
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 07:10:00 -
[107] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Actually I'm pretty sure Cloaky T3's won't see very much of a nerf. The Super Tanky DPS T3 setup will see a Nerf for sure. And some other T3 area's will get a substantial buff. But Cloaky T3's slot in fairly well alongside the other T2 Cloakies. I agree, and would actually go so far to suggest most of the cloaky T3s could use a bit of a damage buff. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1212
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 07:27:00 -
[108] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:
Covert Ops on a battleship ha ha ha ha ha
Everyone claims it would be broken, yet we have never seen one in action. Given their slow align, slow lock times before cloak, and slow warp, I don't think it would actually be that much of an issue. Cloaky T3's haven't broken the game despite having near BS tanks (When talking about a Blops tank equivalent) & DPS. It's not like we are talking about a cloaking Vindi.
oo they have.. and that is why they will be nerfed "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1212
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 07:29:00 -
[109] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Actually I'm pretty sure Cloaky T3's won't see very much of a nerf. The Super Tanky DPS T3 setup will see a Nerf for sure. And some other T3 area's will get a substantial buff. But Cloaky T3's slot in fairly well alongside the other T2 Cloakies. I agree, and would actually go so far to suggest most of the cloaky T3s could use a bit of a damage buff.
Nope.. Cloakyt3 must be massively nerfed specially now tht the ships can be reconfigured in space "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
2859
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 07:30:00 -
[110] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Nope.. Cloakyt3 must be massively nerfed specially now tht the ships can be reconfigured in space Yeah, rightGǪ Dropping a MD is like sending up a flare. Now if you were to integrate the subsystem swapping into the ship, that's another matter altogether... I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |
|

Laiannah Sahireen
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 09:18:00 -
[111] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Any sites that spawn 'Sentient' Rogue Drone Frigates, Cruisers or Battleships can now drop these items..
Could you please confirm if the 'overseer' loot cans, such as that in the Rogue Drone 3/10 will have a chance to drop the appropriate BPC (in this case the frigate).
The corresponding cans in pirate DED sites have a chance to drop these BPCs, such as the can in the 2nd room of the Blood Raider 1/10, which has a small chance to drop a Cruor BPC.
This would be a very welcome change as it would make the abundance of Drone sites in lowsec slightly less useless, as well as achieving your goal of bringing down the SOE ship price. |

Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
801
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 09:59:00 -
[112] - Quote
Ah great, so you are giving it in the rear to all those who are trying to get a Nestor through mission grinding. I see crapping all over the normal market dynamics is not a problem for you.
If you want to press the price of SOE ships down to a level that justifies their performance, I guesstimate you have to increase the supply by 3-400%. This will essentially make drones the only source worth considering if you are trying to obtain one of these BPCs, as only fools and people with bad math skills will try to obtain one through the LP store; if they do have SOE LP they should trade them for other high value SOE items, sell those and use the ISK to buy a BPC from a drone dropping.
So, what is the point having the ships in the SOE store then? Why is it priced at 600.000 SOE LP when you acknowledge it is not worth 600.000 SOE LP?*
*:Emphasize that SOE LP is and will be worth a lot of ISK. Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-á |

I am disposable
Republic University Minmatar Republic
94
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 10:27:00 -
[113] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:I am disposable wrote:Seems like a good idea to me. I still think the Nestor sucks, but at 800 misk it won't suck as much. Plus drone space gets a bump in value. Even with a price reduction to $800-million, the Nestor is still about 100% overpriced...
Probably more than that. I still think a Dominix is a straight up superior ship. |

I am disposable
Republic University Minmatar Republic
94
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 10:29:00 -
[114] - Quote
Jowen Datloran wrote:Ah great, so you are giving it in the rear to all those who are trying to get a Nestor through mission grinding. I see crapping all over the normal market dynamics is not a problem for you.
If you want to press the price of SOE ships down to a level that justifies their performances, I guesstimate you have to increase the supply by 3-400%. This will essentially make drones the only source worth considering if you are trying to obtain one of these BPCs, as only fools and people with bad math skills will try to obtain one through the LP store; if they do have SOE LP they should trade them for other high value SOE items, sell those and use the ISK to buy a BPC from a drone dropping.
So, what is the point having the ships in the SOE store then? Why is it priced at 600.000 SOE LP when you acknowledge it is not worth 600.000 SOE LP?*
*:Emphasize that SOE LP is and will be worth a lot of ISK.
Yeah it would seem that a LP price drop is in order as well. There are much, much, much better things to spend SOE LP on. |

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
259
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 11:13:00 -
[115] - Quote
The timing is amusing.
They waited 4 or 5 days for as many highsec grinders as possible to commit to Nestor blueprints before announcing the change :D
I notice some people have multiple Nestor for sale they are probably furious :D
|

Arkon Olacar
Blue-Fire
264
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 11:43:00 -
[116] - Quote
This is a pretty sloppy duct-tape patch job that makes very little sense.
If you want to give the drone regions a buff while bringing down the price of the SoE ships, why not allow them to drop chips/items that can be exchanged for LP at ANY faction store? This would act as a relief valve on any future LP price hikes, makes up for the lack of a rogue drone faction which you might otherwise run missions for, and makes a little more sense than just SoE being involved (as literally everyone will be at least slightly 'grr rogue drones' in roleplay land). Warping to zero |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1036
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 12:01:00 -
[117] - Quote
SoE have a long history of being involved with Rogue Drones, and dodgy things. So perfectly reasonable for them to be making use of Drone Chips somehow.... |

Aren Dar
EVE University Ivy League
17
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 12:43:00 -
[118] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:SoE have a long history of being involved with Rogue Drones, and dodgy things. So perfectly reasonable for them to be making use of Drone Chips somehow....
So spin that into lore - have a Sisters faction spawn appear in these sites sometimes, and have them drop an object that can be converted, that kind of ties into the game better than having random NPC drop random object that can be converted to something else. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1036
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 13:09:00 -
[119] - Quote
Uh, so you are saying that you should shoot sisters ships and give the SOE the loot from sisters ships and get given BPC's.... Or are you suggesting missions against the SOE what drop BPC's?
What exactly is wrong with the logic of 'SOE take a Rogue Drone control chip, and in return give you this ship BPC that just happens to have bonuses to drone control.... by pure co-incidence, they totally aren't using Rogue drone technology to help them with the ships at all......' |

Medalyn Isis
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 13:16:00 -
[120] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Uh, so you are saying that you should shoot sisters ships and give the SOE the loot from sisters ships and get given BPC's.... Or are you suggesting missions against the SOE what drop BPC's?
What exactly is wrong with the logic of 'SOE take a Rogue Drone control chip, and in return give you this ship BPC that just happens to have bonuses to drone control.... by pure co-incidence, they totally aren't using Rogue drone technology to help them with the ships at all......' That argument could be spun for practically any ship which uses drones in eve then and is really a little weak. I would agree CCP need to make a more solid link here. Why specifically is this ship tied to rogue drones other than the obvious of helping the drone regions out? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |