Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Medalyn Isis
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
181
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:02:00 -
[61] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:As anyone who was watching the fanfest stream knows, CCP Greyscale today announced that T2 BPOs will be going away in the future: that they've caused problems for the game for years and everyone has felt they'd be going away at some point. That point is apparently coming soon. The discussion indicated that they would not simply be deleted but that there would be a phasing out plan (presumably, the often-considered replacement with BPCs with a large number of copies).
Interestingly, CCP thought that people buying and selling T2 BPOs should have been taking this risk into account. As every bpo sells for something like 7-10 years profit at this point, players clearly did not have that sort of foresight or common sense, so we can expect the price to plummet dramatically.
What are people's thoughts on finally eradicating T2 BPOs to secure a future for invention as the only means of producing T2 bpos, and what do people think will happen in the interim between now and their eventual demise? What sorts of outrage do we expect from current T2 BPO holders who see large parts of their investment wiped out? Should they be compensated, or should we realize that buying a product that clearly was bad for the game and paying a decade's worth of profit was the sort of "sure, let me lend a million dollars to this strawberry picker for a mortgage on a mansion worth more than he'll make in his lifetime" financial decision that deserves the loss that everyone but they saw coming? When it comes to the plan to bail out T2 bpo holders with BPCs, how much is enough/too much? What sort of prices do we think we'll see people bailing out of their T2 BPO investments at, or do you think they'll hang onto them hoping that if they post loudly enough, they'll change CCP's mind?
I know you are wanting to prise as many T2 BPOs from any industrialists cold dead hands, but sinking to this level... *slowly shakes head*
Heh wonder if anyone was actually dumb enough to fall for this and sold their T2 BPO. |

Revman Zim
Common Sense Ltd Nulli Secunda
253
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:06:00 -
[62] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:mkint wrote: Invention can never match a BPO. Production from a T2 BPO less than half as much build materials as an invention build, not even counting the cost of doing the invention itself. That sucks. But where it's completely broken is where a single T2 BPO can completely shut down all invention for a particular item, if you've got the right BPO. That's just not acceptable, no matter how much you paid for that BPO.
Exactly how many T2 BPOs do you believe there are in game, and which ones exactly can shut down all invention? If a single BPO can shut down all invention, what does it tell you about demand for that particular item? Have you actually done invention? A T2 BPO owner is limited on how many items he can make in a given time period. Inventors can create virtually unlimited runs that can be built simultaneously. If there is a lot of demand for Ishtars (for instance) an you build Ishtars is it more advantageous to be able to manufacture them using 1 manufacturing slot, or 10 at once? "That Sucks" sounds a lot like jealousy to me.
Making copies of a T2 BPO means the only limitation of items to be made is based on the number of manufacturing jobs you and your alts have skills for.
It is an unfair game mechanic. You are on the other side of course, because you are benefiting from the imbalance. Congrats. CCP is going to fix it. Great.
|

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5260
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:15:00 -
[63] - Quote
Revman Zim wrote:
Making copies of a T2 BPO means the only limitation of items to be made is based on the number of manufacturing jobs you and your alts have skills for.
It is an unfair game mechanic. You are on the other side of course, because you are benefiting from the imbalance. Congrats. CCP is going to fix it. Great.
Making copies takes longer per run than manufacturing. How does that disadvantage create an advantage?
You keep saying it's unfair, but you have not demonstrated how. See jealousy.
How do I benefit when I no longer own a T2 BPO and have not for many years?
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5703
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:24:00 -
[64] - Quote
Revman Zim wrote:
Making copies of a T2 BPO means the only limitation of items to be made is based on the number of manufacturing jobs you and your alts have skills for.
It is an unfair game mechanic. You are on the other side of course, because you are benefiting from the imbalance. Congrats. CCP is going to fix it. Great.
I don't have one. I just have a problem with CCP vaporizing player's assets to make up for their own past mistakes. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Revman Zim
Common Sense Ltd Nulli Secunda
253
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:29:00 -
[65] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Revman Zim wrote:
Making copies of a T2 BPO means the only limitation of items to be made is based on the number of manufacturing jobs you and your alts have skills for.
It is an unfair game mechanic. You are on the other side of course, because you are benefiting from the imbalance. Congrats. CCP is going to fix it. Great.
Making copies takes longer per run than manufacturing. How does that disadvantage create an advantage? You keep saying it's unfair, but you have not demonstrated how. See jealousy. How do I benefit when I no longer own a T2 BPO and have not for many years?
I am not jealous. I don't do T2 manufacturing. You trying to derail the conversation with personal attacks is juvenile.
I just want the mechanics of EVE to be equal for all. This is an instance where it is NOT.
Note, I said MECHANICS. Not skills, not experience... etc. So don't try to derail and turn this into "making EVE easier". |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5260
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:40:00 -
[66] - Quote
Revman Zim wrote: I don't do T2 manufacturing.
I just want the mechanics of EVE to be equal for all. This is an instance where it is NOT.
Note, I said MECHANICS. Not skills, not experience... etc. So don't try to derail and turn this into "making EVE easier".
O.K. You admittedly don't do T2 manufacturing so you have no idea what you are talking about and have never done the math because you'd know that invention is more lucrative.
Just because you *believe* something is bad due to simple ignorance or because someone else told you to believe so is not a good reason for CCP to take something away from another player because you can't have it too.
Gotcha. All is clear now. Original synopsis affirmed. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Prince Kobol
1678
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:40:00 -
[67] - Quote
Goons want your T2 BPO'S
Goons sperg post to create panic that they all going to get removed and your going to be holding nothing.
Stupid people rush to sell their T2 BPO's for next to nothing.
Goons buy lots of T2 BPO's very cheap and laugh at how stupid people are.
CCP announce they will do something to T2 BPO's in soon..
x number of years later T2 BPO's still exist in their current form. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7242
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:44:00 -
[68] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Goons want your T2 BPO'S
Goons sperg post to create panic that they all going to get removed and your going to be holding nothing.
Stupid people rush to sell their T2 BPO's for next to nothing.
Goons buy lots of T2 BPO's very cheap and laugh at how stupid people are.
CCP announce they will do something to T2 BPO's in soon..
x number of years later T2 BPO's still exist in their current form. There's no need to take my word for it: anyone who watched the panel (or paid for HD and can rewatch) can confirm. I realize that denial is the first stage of grief but you're going to need to work harder on it. Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9501
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:47:00 -
[69] - Quote
Buying T2 BPOs is pretty stupid anyway. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Zakarumit CZ
Zakarum Industries Exiliar Syndicate
176
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:47:00 -
[70] - Quote
Revman Zim wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Revman Zim wrote:
Making copies of a T2 BPO means the only limitation of items to be made is based on the number of manufacturing jobs you and your alts have skills for.
It is an unfair game mechanic. You are on the other side of course, because you are benefiting from the imbalance. Congrats. CCP is going to fix it. Great.
Making copies takes longer per run than manufacturing. How does that disadvantage create an advantage? You keep saying it's unfair, but you have not demonstrated how. See jealousy. How do I benefit when I no longer own a T2 BPO and have not for many years? I am not jealous. I don't do T2 manufacturing. You trying to derail the conversation with personal attacks is juvenile. I just want the mechanics of EVE to be equal for all. This is an instance where it is NOT. Note, I said MECHANICS. Not skills, not experience... etc. So don't try to derail and turn this into "making EVE easier".
...you realise noone is stopping anyone from buying T2 BPOs? They are not limited to current owners as for example high sec capital ships. There are dozens of them for sale on contracts and another dozens on forum auctions. So yes, if you want to, you can get one. Its equal for everybody. Evem a newbie can buy one, if he is willing to spend ISK.
|
|

Dramaticus
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
519
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:48:00 -
[71] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Revman Zim wrote:
Making copies of a T2 BPO means the only limitation of items to be made is based on the number of manufacturing jobs you and your alts have skills for.
It is an unfair game mechanic. You are on the other side of course, because you are benefiting from the imbalance. Congrats. CCP is going to fix it. Great.
I don't have one. I just have a problem with CCP vaporizing player's assets to make up for their own past mistakes.
Thankfully CCP has shown the strength to do this before! The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal
The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them |

Revman Zim
Common Sense Ltd Nulli Secunda
253
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:49:00 -
[72] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Revman Zim wrote: I don't do T2 manufacturing.
I just want the mechanics of EVE to be equal for all. This is an instance where it is NOT.
Note, I said MECHANICS. Not skills, not experience... etc. So don't try to derail and turn this into "making EVE easier".
O.K. You admittedly don't do T2 manufacturing so you have no idea what you are talking about and have never done the math because you'd know that invention is more lucrative. Just because you *believe* something is bad due to simple ignorance or because someone else told you to believe so is not a good reason for CCP to take something away from another player because you can't have it too. Gotcha. All is clear now. Original synopsis affirmed.
Just because I don't do T2 manufacturing NOW. Does not mean i have NEVER done it. I have. I understand the mechanics and have done it all. I used to make T2 100mn ABs and MWDs on another toon.
Once again, you are trying to negate my observations, not with anything valuable, but with more attacks.
|

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
652
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 21:57:00 -
[73] - Quote
I think that if T2 BPOs are a problem, they should be nerfed, but not removed or replaced with BPCs.
A suitable nerf would be to lock them at ME/TE -1or something along those lines.
If there is a way to preserve the status of T2 BPOs while further reducing their impact on the market, that might be the best course of action for CCP to take. IMO T2 BPOs serve an important function of parking wealth for the super-rich. They sort of underpin the Eve economy in this way.
Either way I won't be shedding a tear, but I vote for keeping T2 BPOs unique and functional while greatly reducing their power (through production speed or efficiency reductions). I would certainly hope CCP is weighing this option along with the others. |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
798
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:02:00 -
[74] - Quote
Compensation for T2 BPO holders?
We really want to start setting a precedent every time someone loses investment on a nerf?
Will I be able to get compensated when I lose my investment in something non-T2-BPO-related nerfed? Or is this just something for T2 BPO holders?
My thoughts are, just like everyone else has had to suck up investment losses on everything that has ever gotten nerfed, T2 BPO holders shall do the same. But that's just what I think. |

Antihrist Pripravnik
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
246
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:12:00 -
[75] - Quote
Finally.
An outdated game mechanic that was discontinued more than 5 years back is getting removed.
Good riddance. My signature got stolen (o.0) |

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1745
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:12:00 -
[76] - Quote
Here's how CCP's probably going to do it, if they're smart.
First, in one of the point releases after kronos, they're going to nerf T2 BPOs across the board as part of an industry re-balance. Just like ships can be overpowered, so too can certain industry assets. They will be nerfed to the point where producing with T2 bpos will be completely non-competitive compared to invention.
About six months to a year after that change, they're going to replace all T2 BPO's with a 5000 run copy of a max invention blueprint, and at that time you are going to thank them.
And it's about time too.  |

handbanana
State War Academy Caldari State
117
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:12:00 -
[77] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Goons want your T2 BPO'S
Goons sperg post to create panic that they all going to get removed and your going to be holding nothing.
Stupid people rush to sell their T2 BPO's for next to nothing.
Goons buy lots of T2 BPO's very cheap and laugh at how stupid people are.
CCP announce they will do something to T2 BPO's in soon..
x number of years later T2 BPO's still exist in their current form. There's no need to take my word for it: anyone who watched the panel (or paid for HD and can rewatch) can confirm. I realize that denial is the first stage of grief but you're going to need to work harder on it.
Except nowhere in the panel did they say T2 bpos would be removed or that CCP had any kind of a solution.
Typical goons trying to leverage the meta game.
GÇ£It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.GÇ¥ -á-á -Jack Handy
|

mkint
1178
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:49:00 -
[78] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:mkint wrote: Invention can never match a BPO. Production from a T2 BPO less than half as much build materials as an invention build, not even counting the cost of doing the invention itself. That sucks. But where it's completely broken is where a single T2 BPO can completely shut down all invention for a particular item, if you've got the right BPO. That's just not acceptable, no matter how much you paid for that BPO.
Exactly how many T2 BPOs do you believe there are in game, and which ones exactly can shut down all invention? If a single BPO can shut down all invention, what does it tell you about demand for that particular item? Have you actually done invention? A T2 BPO owner is limited on how many items he can make in a given time period. Inventors can create virtually unlimited runs that can be built simultaneously. If there is a lot of demand for Ishtars (for instance) an you build Ishtars is it more advantageous to be able to manufacture them using 1 manufacturing slot, or 10 at once? "That Sucks" sounds a lot like jealousy to me. No, "that sucks" goes a long way to making invention even worse. And yes, there are definitely items where invention is not a thing because of the BPOs... devs have talked about it before, most recently in some of the industry threads. If you've got the right T2 BPO it will dominate that market to the point where it is literally impossible to profit from invention. In those particular cases, the production capabilities of the BPO outpace demand, apparently by a wide enough margin that normal playerbase growth will never offset it. I believe it's some certain ships... like the HACs or something. Or at least it used to be. I honestly don't know all the economic details of which ones, I just know what's shown up in devblogs, dev posts, and to a lesser extent what some of the players have said on the forums. Maxim 34: If you're leaving scorch-marks, you need a bigger gun. |

Dave Stark
5238
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:50:00 -
[79] - Quote
eve isn't fair, just make them vanish in to thin air one day. |

esquimo leviticus
Wrecking Shots Black Legion.
5
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:56:00 -
[80] - Quote
Obvious troll is obvious.  |
|

Gamer4liff
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
83
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 23:07:00 -
[81] - Quote
The only thing wrong with T2 BPOs is that there is no legit way to get them without having to buy them from somebody like a chump. :colbert:
E: Oveur Did Nothing Wrong. |

MailDeadDrop
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
309
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 01:56:00 -
[82] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:I don't have one. I just have a problem with CCP vaporizing player's CCP's assets to make up for their own past mistakes. FTFY
MDD |

Hurtado Soneka
Rogue of Blade
210
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 01:58:00 -
[83] - Quote
T2 BPOs should have be wiped out when invention got introduced, it shouldnt have taken this long |

Doireen Kaundur
Minmatar Republic
890
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 01:59:00 -
[84] - Quote
Who is T2-BPO?
Was he in star wars and why is he a problem?
|

Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
1040
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 02:03:00 -
[85] - Quote
Reverse lottery: you win it, you lose your BPOs. It's only fair. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |

Wrayeth
Inexorable Retribution
157
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 02:10:00 -
[86] - Quote
mkint wrote: No, "that sucks" goes a long way to making invention even worse. And yes, there are definitely items where invention is not a thing because of the BPOs... devs have talked about it before, most recently in some of the industry threads. If you've got the right T2 BPO it will dominate that market to the point where it is literally impossible to profit from invention. In those particular cases, the production capabilities of the BPO outpace demand, apparently by a wide enough margin that normal playerbase growth will never offset it. I believe it's some certain ships... like the HACs or something. Or at least it used to be. I honestly don't know all the economic details of which ones, I just know what's shown up in devblogs, dev posts, and to a lesser extent what some of the players have said on the forums.
For those BPOs that make invention unfeasible due to there being more supply than demand, there's a simple solution: increase the time to produce items from those BPOs so that production from the BPOs alone can't keep up with demand. This will create room for inventors to step into the market. This is a far better solution than removing T2 BPOs from the game and shafting those who have them.
Admittedly, I personally own a Torpedo Launcher II BPO, but I rarely build from it anymore since the profit margin isn't exactly huge and the production rate is slow. An inventor can easily out-produce me just by building from multiple BPCs at once, making up in volume what he lacks in efficiency. |

Hurtado Soneka
Rogue of Blade
210
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 02:12:00 -
[87] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Revman Zim wrote: I don't do T2 manufacturing.
I just want the mechanics of EVE to be equal for all. This is an instance where it is NOT.
Note, I said MECHANICS. Not skills, not experience... etc. So don't try to derail and turn this into "making EVE easier".
O.K. You admittedly don't do T2 manufacturing so you have no idea what you are talking about and have never done the math because you'd know that invention is more lucrative. Just because you *believe* something is bad due to simple ignorance or because someone else told you to believe so is not a good reason for CCP to take something away from another player because you can't have it too. Gotcha. All is clear now. Original synopsis affirmed.
stop sounding like a stupid scrub, T2 BPOs outside the scope of invention should and WILL be eradicated.
/thread |

Knights Armament
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
229
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 02:14:00 -
[88] - Quote
I think that hurting t2 BPO owners is a good thing, because of jealousy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZOdADD5RNs&feature=youtu.be http://evemouthbreathers.blogspot.com/ https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=29554516-05f9-4eca-a942-32e1701a6569&action=buddy |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5625
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 02:15:00 -
[89] - Quote
Hurtado Soneka wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Revman Zim wrote: I don't do T2 manufacturing.
I just want the mechanics of EVE to be equal for all. This is an instance where it is NOT.
Note, I said MECHANICS. Not skills, not experience... etc. So don't try to derail and turn this into "making EVE easier".
O.K. You admittedly don't do T2 manufacturing so you have no idea what you are talking about and have never done the math because you'd know that invention is more lucrative. Just because you *believe* something is bad due to simple ignorance or because someone else told you to believe so is not a good reason for CCP to take something away from another player because you can't have it too. Gotcha. All is clear now. Original synopsis affirmed. stop sounding like a stupid scrub, T2 BPOs outside the scope of invention should and WILL be eradicated. /thread Except, of course, that he is right.  To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Octoven
Phoenix Productions Headshot Gaming
370
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 02:18:00 -
[90] - Quote
I would love to see all T2 BPOs just eliminated completely, the recent changes makes copies more competitive but BPOs will always remain king simply because of the negative ME factor. I've heard quite a few BPO owners getting butt-hurt over this and to tell you the truth its because they cant be the proverbial bully in the sandbox holding a toy over a little child's head (in industrial terms that is). They wanted massive superiority and they are getting that reduced, they still hold an upper hand just not a huge one anymore. They should be thankful for that, personally I'd rather eradicate all of them period, they were a mistake to the game and has haunted the markets since. Take a look at Deep Space Probes for example, when Odyssey removed those the probes got converted over as did any DSP BPOs...no one got to keep them, granted they wouldn't really have much of a usage to build them except nostalgia; however, the concept remains the same, an item was removed from the game. Although...T2 BPOs weren't technically removed so much as just not seeded for sell anymore.
SO yes, get the Jovians to do a raid on everyone and get them back after all, according to John Rourke, "getting this tech out of the universe can only be a good thing."  |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |