| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Benilopax
The Ashen Lion Syndicate
39
   |
Posted - 2011.11.20 14:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Our two "little things" teams have done a great job to sort out many of the so called paper cuts improving game play.
Crucible is now locked as we approach release and decisions on the next expansion will begin in the new year.
What would you call an open wound of eve? A feature that needs an overhaul in it's mechanics the big issue that needs a team working on it for 6 months.
Feel free to order your features in order of priority and vote up other ideas, I'll try to maintain a list in the OP in order of preference.
Brain storm! |
Jack bubu
GK inc.
Pandemic Legion
76
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 14:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
nvm i fail to read OP
I'd like instant local removed + the long promised ship formations |
Capt Failhard
State War Academy
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 14:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
I'm waiting anxiously for skill tree re-specs. |
Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf
Fatal Ascension
148
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 15:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
 Spamming D-Scan is dumb. Let me set my range and the D-Scan should just scan itself?
Jumping into a system > right clicking {celestial} to see "Show Info" as the game has not caught up do to a weird hesitation in the session change. Make the menu refresh itself and not close after session change maybe? That or don't let me open the menu till it's caught up.
Logging off restarts client instead of going to character selection screen.
Strategic cruisers unable to refit in strategic places, such as POS's.
Unable to re-package in corp hangars.
Corp management UI
Creating jobs in science and industry. The screen should remember the last installation and the button should automatically take you to the list of assembly lines based on the last installation you used.
It's not Rocket Surgery |
Alara IonStorm
RvB - BLUE Republic
452
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 15:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Signatures, Anomalies and Wormholes all in separate scan categories instead of just Sigs and Anoms. |
Hoban Gallifrey
New Eden University
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 16:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dare I say? FW? |
Benilopax
The Ashen Lion Syndicate
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 16:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
I think you misunderstand me there are little things threads for small changes, I mean big changes!
0.0, FW, Low sec etc. |
Takseen
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 16:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
Wardecs are still messy.
An alternative to spamming D scanner for hostiles would be nice.
Lowsec is still very unappealing.
|
Long John Silver
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 16:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
I think the current alliance thing has more or less reached its end-game.
It's time to seriously shake up null, open the gates and pull down the temple pillars, that sort of thing.
Long John Silver | Pirate Alt-áand Forum Troll. |
Paragon Renegade
Solar Arbiters
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 16:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mining should be better, FW needs moar luv, Level 4's need to go into lowsec, drone regions should be fixed, Sov system needs to not fail, ISK needs to be subject to cpunter-inflation
"Man, you aren't actually trying to do this, right? Nobody is that stupid right?"
"How wrong you are" |
Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf
Fatal Ascension
151
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 17:01:00 -
[11] - Quote
Corporate Roles system and interface.
Taking and claiming sov as well as sov cleanup after defeating an enemy. There's no decay to a system that has been abandoned.
Null sec in general has no benefit over empire for being a grunt.
Nullsec manufacturing sucks and has too many added costs which don't outweigh the benefits of manufacturing in empire.
Deployed outposts are too expensive to upgrade making them less desirable than manufacturing in empire.
Declaring War seems kind of stupid. It's used as a griefing tactic rather than a method of creating conflict.
Faction Warfare
Projectiles are vastly superior to all other weapon systems.
It's not Rocket Surgery |
Jett0
Team Kitty Choke Slam
44
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 17:06:00 -
[12] - Quote
With Carbon in place, I'd love to see a complete UI overhaul, using the trailers as inspiration. |
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
150
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 18:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
Blob biased mechanics (ex. EHP grind sovereignty). Has been the cause of just about everything that ails Eve (outside of highsec). |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration
155
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 18:20:00 -
[14] - Quote
Invulnerable Logistics (Jump freighters, nullified cloaky T3s, blockade runners in lowsec)
Teleportation (jump mechanics) and large fleet movement
All GëíGêçGëí Ships | Many Odd GëíGêçGëí Items (+Drones) | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |
Crazy KSK
Tsunami Cartel
Dark Solar Empire
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 19:32:00 -
[15] - Quote
movement in eve is too fast thus eve feels very small and stuff like jita happens
separate the empires with low sec
systems are too small
jump bridges / jump ships
most systems are boring and repetitive
low sec needs a reason to be there
id like to see pvp brought away from gates (player owned customs offices are a start)
Faction warfare needs fixing and should have greater effect on things (like systems becoming low sec when attacked and highsec when held for some time) |
Dalloway Jones
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
132
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 19:39:00 -
[16] - Quote
Crazy KSK wrote:movement in eve is too fast thus eve feels very small and stuff like jita happens
WOT?
Ship speeds need to be doubled across the board so that playing Eve feels like watching an Eve trailer where cruisers and battlecruisers zip around like they are frigates. |
Cipher Jones
114
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 19:49:00 -
[17] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:Blob biased mechanics (ex. EHP grind sovereignty). Has been the cause of just about everything that ails Eve (outside of highsec).
Said it before and ill say it again, blobbing is not a mechanics issue, it has to do with human nature. The ONLY mechanic you can use to twart blobbing is having arena style PvP where the number of participants is limited.
Yes, lets repeat that, if you don't limit the number of participants in PvP there will always be blobbing, period.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |
Zirse
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
159
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 19:56:00 -
[18] - Quote
Sovereignty needs a big overhaul.
There needs to be:
a) a reason to want to reside in nullsec beyond goodfights
b) a reason to take sovereignty beyond strategic level resources
c) a system that rewards inhabitants rather than the just claimants
All of those three could in theory tie in together, hopefully CCP moves sov in the right direction.
The UI needs an entire development cycle or even two devoted to it.
|
Mr LaForge
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
139
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 19:58:00 -
[19] - Quote
Excuse me i need to go beat a dead horse. I've done it for 2 something years but its still out there waiting to be beaten again.
I Support the Goons! |
Dbars Grinding
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
46
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 20:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
20 day skill Qs. |
Spr09
Purdue Engineering and Technology
Talocan United
14
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 20:02:00 -
[21] - Quote
the transition between our POS fuel now and the fuel blocks we'll be getting soon. i dont want my pos going offline for the next few hours waiting for the blocks to get produced.
more kinds of anomalies, burning though a couple dozen at a time gets kind of boring when they all look alike.
a new purpose for EAFs, maybe a counter to cloakys? |
Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
296
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 20:06:00 -
[22] - Quote
Jack bubu wrote:nvm i fail to read OP
I'd like instant local removed + the long promised ship formations
This combined with ship explosion damage would be an interesting addition.
-
[img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img]
[yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |
Bubanni
SniggWaffe
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 20:55:00 -
[23] - Quote
They could make "sov grinding" a time based event... like defending a stucture for a few hours a few times on grid. that way a single pod pilot can take over a system if it is not defended (over a period of time) |
Salpad
Carebears with Attitude
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 20:56:00 -
[24] - Quote
Automated ship and module usage tracking. Seriously. I want CCP to make objecture measurements of how many hours of active flying each ship hull gets, and how many hours of active fitted flying each module gets. Thus must include analysis of certain obvious "off-key" uses, such as using a Destroyer hull for non-combat purposes, easily predictable and easily detectable (ship not ftting weapons).
That way, CCP can move closer to objective identification of game balance problems, i.e. identifying those ships that are underpowered and thus unpopular.
|
Karn Dulake
Souls Must Be Trampled
The.Alliance
101
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 21:25:00 -
[25] - Quote
That i cannot find out the real names and addresses of all the trolls ive met so i can begin my campaign of slaughter.
Oh and Dscan should have an automatic update |
Solstice Project
Cult of Personality
173
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 22:12:00 -
[26] - Quote
I want to be able to legally shoot pods that have a GCC in highsec. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
373
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 22:16:00 -
[27] - Quote
Open wounds in eve?
Low Sec
Despiarity between PVE and PVP mindsets.
POS
Sovern benifits/ Empire building.
Lack of walking in stations.
|
Bischopt
Ice Fire Warriors
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 22:17:00 -
[28] - Quote
For me the open wound right now is nex and aur.
Other than that, FW. It's been ignored for so long. |
StukaBee
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
29
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 22:34:00 -
[29] - Quote
Risk vs reward.
Edit: Specifically, L4 missions and highsec incursions. |
Baden Luskan
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 22:49:00 -
[30] - Quote
AFK cloaking. A player should not be able to hamper a system so effectivily while not only being AFK, but immune to being found. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |