EVE Search - Dealing with the papercuts, what's your EVE open wound?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Dealing with the papercuts, what's your EVE open wound?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Benilopax The Ashen Lion Syndicate 39	Posted - 2011.11.20 14:01:00 - [1] - Quote Our two "little things" teams have done a great job to sort out many of the so called paper cuts improving game play. Crucible is now locked as we approach release and decisions on the next expansion will begin in the new year. What would you call an open wound of eve? A feature that needs an overhaul in it's mechanics the big issue that needs a team working on it for 6 months. Feel free to order your features in order of priority and vote up other ideas, I'll try to maintain a list in the OP in order of preference. Brain storm!
Jack bubu GK inc. Pandemic Legion 76	Posted - 2011.11.20 14:39:00 - [2] - Quote nvm i fail to read OP I'd like instant local removed + the long promised ship formations
Capt Failhard State War Academy Caldari State 0	Posted - 2011.11.20 14:46:00 - [3] - Quote I'm waiting anxiously for skill tree re-specs.
Zagdul Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension 148	Posted - 2011.11.20 15:32:00 - [4] - Quote Spamming D-Scan is dumb. Let me set my range and the D-Scan should just scan itself? Jumping into a system > right clicking {celestial} to see "Show Info" as the game has not caught up do to a weird hesitation in the session change. Make the menu refresh itself and not close after session change maybe? That or don't let me open the menu till it's caught up. Logging off restarts client instead of going to character selection screen. Strategic cruisers unable to refit in strategic places, such as POS's. Unable to re-package in corp hangars. Corp management UI Creating jobs in science and industry. The screen should remember the last installation and the button should automatically take you to the list of assembly lines based on the last installation you used. It's not Rocket Surgery
Alara IonStorm RvB - BLUE Republic 452	Posted - 2011.11.20 15:41:00 - [5] - Quote Signatures, Anomalies and Wormholes all in separate scan categories instead of just Sigs and Anoms.
Hoban Gallifrey New Eden University 0	Posted - 2011.11.20 16:00:00 - [6] - Quote Dare I say? FW?
Benilopax The Ashen Lion Syndicate 39	Posted - 2011.11.20 16:02:00 - [7] - Quote I think you misunderstand me there are little things threads for small changes, I mean big changes! 0.0, FW, Low sec etc.
Takseen University of Caille Gallente Federation 20	Posted - 2011.11.20 16:22:00 - [8] - Quote Wardecs are still messy. An alternative to spamming D scanner for hostiles would be nice. Lowsec is still very unappealing.
Long John Silver Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 18	Posted - 2011.11.20 16:53:00 - [9] - Quote I think the current alliance thing has more or less reached its end-game. It's time to seriously shake up null, open the gates and pull down the temple pillars, that sort of thing. Long John Silver \| Pirate Alt-áand Forum Troll.
Paragon Renegade Solar Arbiters 104	Posted - 2011.11.20 16:59:00 - [10] - Quote Mining should be better, FW needs moar luv, Level 4's need to go into lowsec, drone regions should be fixed, Sov system needs to not fail, ISK needs to be subject to cpunter-inflation "Man, you aren't actually trying to do this, right? Nobody is that stupid right?" "How wrong you are"
Zagdul Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension 151	Posted - 2011.11.20 17:01:00 - [11] - Quote Corporate Roles system and interface. Taking and claiming sov as well as sov cleanup after defeating an enemy. There's no decay to a system that has been abandoned. Null sec in general has no benefit over empire for being a grunt. Nullsec manufacturing sucks and has too many added costs which don't outweigh the benefits of manufacturing in empire. Deployed outposts are too expensive to upgrade making them less desirable than manufacturing in empire. Declaring War seems kind of stupid. It's used as a griefing tactic rather than a method of creating conflict. Faction Warfare Projectiles are vastly superior to all other weapon systems. It's not Rocket Surgery
Jett0 Team Kitty Choke Slam 44	Posted - 2011.11.20 17:06:00 - [12] - Quote With Carbon in place, I'd love to see a complete UI overhaul, using the trailers as inspiration.
Hirana Yoshida Behavioral Affront 150	Posted - 2011.11.20 18:17:00 - [13] - Quote Blob biased mechanics (ex. EHP grind sovereignty). Has been the cause of just about everything that ails Eve (outside of highsec).
Gogela Freeport Exploration 155	Posted - 2011.11.20 18:20:00 - [14] - Quote Invulnerable Logistics (Jump freighters, nullified cloaky T3s, blockade runners in lowsec) Teleportation (jump mechanics) and large fleet movement All GëíGêçGëí Ships \| Many Odd GëíGêçGëí Items (+Drones) \| <-- Links to showInfo in-game
Crazy KSK Tsunami Cartel Dark Solar Empire 10	Posted - 2011.11.20 19:32:00 - [15] - Quote movement in eve is too fast thus eve feels very small and stuff like jita happens separate the empires with low sec systems are too small jump bridges / jump ships most systems are boring and repetitive low sec needs a reason to be there id like to see pvp brought away from gates (player owned customs offices are a start) Faction warfare needs fixing and should have greater effect on things (like systems becoming low sec when attacked and highsec when held for some time)
Dalloway Jones Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 132	Posted - 2011.11.20 19:39:00 - [16] - Quote Crazy KSK wrote: movement in eve is too fast thus eve feels very small and stuff like jita happens WOT? Ship speeds need to be doubled across the board so that playing Eve feels like watching an Eve trailer where cruisers and battlecruisers zip around like they are frigates.
Cipher Jones 114	Posted - 2011.11.20 19:49:00 - [17] - Quote Hirana Yoshida wrote: Blob biased mechanics (ex. EHP grind sovereignty). Has been the cause of just about everything that ails Eve (outside of highsec). Said it before and ill say it again, blobbing is not a mechanics issue, it has to do with human nature. The ONLY mechanic you can use to twart blobbing is having arena style PvP where the number of participants is limited. Yes, lets repeat that, if you don't limit the number of participants in PvP there will always be blobbing, period. See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die.
Zirse Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic 159	Posted - 2011.11.20 19:56:00 - [18] - Quote Sovereignty needs a big overhaul. There needs to be: a) a reason to want to reside in nullsec beyond goodfights b) a reason to take sovereignty beyond strategic level resources c) a system that rewards inhabitants rather than the just claimants All of those three could in theory tie in together, hopefully CCP moves sov in the right direction. The UI needs an entire development cycle or even two devoted to it.
Mr LaForge Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 139	Posted - 2011.11.20 19:58:00 - [19] - Quote Excuse me i need to go beat a dead horse. I've done it for 2 something years but its still out there waiting to be beaten again. I Support the Goons!
Dbars Grinding Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation 46	Posted - 2011.11.20 20:01:00 - [20] - Quote 20 day skill Qs.
Spr09 Purdue Engineering and Technology Talocan United 14	Posted - 2011.11.20 20:02:00 - [21] - Quote the transition between our POS fuel now and the fuel blocks we'll be getting soon. i dont want my pos going offline for the next few hours waiting for the blocks to get produced. more kinds of anomalies, burning though a couple dozen at a time gets kind of boring when they all look alike. a new purpose for EAFs, maybe a counter to cloakys?
Ciar Meara Virtus Vindice 296	Posted - 2011.11.20 20:06:00 - [22] - Quote Jack bubu wrote: nvm i fail to read OP I'd like instant local removed + the long promised ship formations This combined with ship explosion damage would be an interesting addition. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow]
Bubanni SniggWaffe 18	Posted - 2011.11.20 20:55:00 - [23] - Quote They could make "sov grinding" a time based event... like defending a stucture for a few hours a few times on grid. that way a single pod pilot can take over a system if it is not defended (over a period of time)
Salpad Carebears with Attitude 8	Posted - 2011.11.20 20:56:00 - [24] - Quote Automated ship and module usage tracking. Seriously. I want CCP to make objecture measurements of how many hours of active flying each ship hull gets, and how many hours of active fitted flying each module gets. Thus must include analysis of certain obvious "off-key" uses, such as using a Destroyer hull for non-combat purposes, easily predictable and easily detectable (ship not ftting weapons). That way, CCP can move closer to objective identification of game balance problems, i.e. identifying those ships that are underpowered and thus unpopular.
Karn Dulake Souls Must Be Trampled The.Alliance 101	Posted - 2011.11.20 21:25:00 - [25] - Quote That i cannot find out the real names and addresses of all the trolls ive met so i can begin my campaign of slaughter. Oh and Dscan should have an automatic update
Solstice Project Cult of Personality 173	Posted - 2011.11.20 22:12:00 - [26] - Quote I want to be able to legally shoot pods that have a GCC in highsec.
Nova Fox Novafox Shipyards 373	Posted - 2011.11.20 22:16:00 - [27] - Quote Open wounds in eve? Low Sec Despiarity between PVE and PVP mindsets. POS Sovern benifits/ Empire building. Lack of walking in stations. Nova Fox Shipyards Inventory
Bischopt Ice Fire Warriors 12	Posted - 2011.11.20 22:17:00 - [28] - Quote For me the open wound right now is nex and aur. Other than that, FW. It's been ignored for so long.
StukaBee GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 29	Posted - 2011.11.20 22:34:00 - [29] - Quote Risk vs reward. Edit: Specifically, L4 missions and highsec incursions.
Baden Luskan Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2011.11.20 22:49:00 - [30] - Quote AFK cloaking. A player should not be able to hamper a system so effectivily while not only being AFK, but immune to being found.
Vagilicious Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 12	Posted - 2011.11.20 22:54:00 - [31] - Quote We're getting the rest of the CQ's, so now it should be plain sailing to concentrate on the rest of WiS and get that moving.
Benilopax The Ashen Lion Syndicate 39	Posted - 2011.11.21 12:17:00 - [32] - Quote Feature list added, keep your ideas and opinions coming!
Hoban Gallifrey New Eden University 1	Posted - 2011.11.21 15:17:00 - [33] - Quote Also, not a major priority but Mining?
Hoban Gallifrey New Eden University 1	Posted - 2011.11.21 15:18:00 - [34] - Quote Also, not a major priority but Mining?
Jaroslav Unwanted Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic 66	Posted - 2011.11.21 15:21:00 - [35] - Quote Cipher Jones wrote: Hirana Yoshida wrote: Blob biased mechanics (ex. EHP grind sovereignty). Has been the cause of just about everything that ails Eve (outside of highsec). Said it before and ill say it again, blobbing is not a mechanics issue, it has to do with human nature. The ONLY mechanic you can use to twart blobbing is having arena style PvP where the number of participants is limited. Yes, lets repeat that, if you don't limit the number of participants in PvP there will always be blobbing, period. well area dmg based on hp of the destroyed ship... will not work but its an nice idea.... blob of 2k battleships one on another you destroy three and rest will just explode due to chain reaction. As i said not gonna happen since maneuverability at big blobs is very limited. Anyway biggest problem with EVE is that people plays it. And people are pure nuts, ****** up beyond borders.
E man Industries SeaChell Productions 142	Posted - 2011.11.21 16:16:00 - [36] - Quote the faction warfar is a big one.. Getting level 4 missions to use sleeper/sancha AI would be nice. High sec level 4 tpye missions that require a group(similar payout to level 4 per pilot) Sactums in 0.0 need to be more intresting as well. 10/10 complexes are not common enough to really claim you have any group 0.0 pve content. So some group content here would be nice. Also roaming gangs have to roam to far...going 30 jumps to find a fight is silly. *Need more-ádecent content a casual player can access in a 1-2h play period that is actually fun and contributes to long term personal and corp goals. This applies to PvE and PvP.*
Riedle Paradox Collective 15	Posted - 2011.11.21 16:47:00 - [37] - Quote Bounty Hunting being made viable! If we fix that it goes a long way to helping low sec!
thekiller2002us Order of Celestial Knights Galactic System Lords Alliance 32	Posted - 2011.11.21 16:53:00 - [38] - Quote it needs more cowbell
Iosue UV Heavy Industries STR8NGE BREW 24	Posted - 2011.11.21 17:05:00 - [39] - Quote Here's what's on my wish list: - Modular POS's - Establishments - Comets (ice that spawn as exploration sites?) - New Tech 3 Ship(s) and/or Mods - Black Ops Love
Opertone Signal 7 17	Posted - 2011.11.21 17:18:00 - [40] - Quote Benilopax wrote: What would you call an open wound of eve? A feature that needs an overhaul in it's mechanics the big issue that needs a team working on it for 6 months. Eve griefing - unfair pvp tactics, station games, bad aggro (getting better), scamming, spamming, logoffski (which will be solved) Eve PvP - no matter how you like it, it's sucky. Warp engine should be removed. No warp offski in PvP fights. Eve botting - really kills eve for many, gives edge to others. Fix eve's PvP and get thousands of subscribers who will enjoy something smarter than today. Really.
Vincent Gaines Macabre Votum Morsus Mihi 137	Posted - 2011.11.21 17:31:00 - [41] - Quote Separate the empires with lowsec, giving several avenues to traverse between them. Safe way = long way (such as going the highsec route between Amarr and Rens. Making travel slower can help make more, smaller trade hubs other than Jita. Security level in lowsec should fluctuate. Put pirate missions in lowsec. Give rewards that are bountiful but not available in hisec, such as boosters and even special ship classes. Enhance smuggling as a career or mission path. Put pirate corps in faction war.
Dr Karsun Coffee Lovers Brewing Club Care Factor 7	Posted - 2011.11.21 17:58:00 - [42] - Quote Complete pos rework... Current system is broken beyond repair... The current patch attempts to fix it at least a bit are not enough. It's not a paper cut, it's a broken limb dangling on the remains of the flesh that didn't get run over by that truck that is trying to back up right now. "Have you had your morning coffee?" -> the Coffee Lovers Brewing Club is recruiting!
Apollo Gabriel Mercatoris Etherium Cartel 280	Posted - 2011.11.21 18:00:00 - [43] - Quote Zagdul wrote: Spamming D-Scan is dumb. Let me set my range and the D-Scan should just scan itself? Jumping into a system > right clicking {celestial} to see "Show Info" as the game has not caught up do to a weird hesitation in the session change. Make the menu refresh itself and not close after session change maybe? That or don't let me open the menu till it's caught up. Logging off restarts client instead of going to character selection screen. Strategic cruisers unable to refit in strategic places, such as POS's. Unable to re-package in corp hangars. Corp management UI Creating jobs in science and industry. The screen should remember the last installation and the button should automatically take you to the list of assembly lines based on the last installation you used. The idea that we can't have a "radar" is absurd. Keep it running all the time, fail to watch it at your own peril. I'll add WHY repackage? just stack the damn modules, if something is broken/damaged, give it a red hue and don't stack it. Let us eat cake! -áI mean open containers in corp hangers please ... Let us stack all modules (eliminate repackaging), except damaged ones, give them a red hue/icon. Let us see damaged drones in our drone bay!
Amro One One. 29	Posted - 2011.11.21 19:26:00 - [44] - Quote Gogela wrote: Invulnerable Logistics (Jump freighters, nullified cloaky T3s, blockade runners in lowsec) Teleportation (jump mechanics) and large fleet movement Looks like this carebear need to get in a dictor and leave high sec. They are not at all invulnerable, just stop failing so much. I want to see a sub system for T3 that lets you act like a HIC/DIC. Then my invulnerable Cloaky nullifier can bubble your ass.
Benilopax The Ashen Lion Syndicate 40	Posted - 2011.11.22 12:43:00 - [45] - Quote List updated.
Sturmwolke 45	Posted - 2011.11.22 13:51:00 - [46] - Quote It isn't a problem per se, more of a conceptual issue. EVE's biggest problem (imo) is it's stale. Many of the working features have little variation in themselves. You see similar concepts, similar implementations ... same old same old. Case in point, the POCO intro, PI and even the sov mechanics. Destruction/anarchy is the main theme that drives player behaviour. Now, CCP thinks WiS is the holy grail that they've been looking for to complete the game. While yes, it certainly expands the scope of gameplay; it isn't the holy grail. The holy grail for EVE is being able to mesh the elements of destruction, grind, in-game world that feels alive (not dumb NPC), in-game consumerism (more natural isk/material sinks) and in-game empire building/cooperative play into a fine balance. They concentrate too much on the first two, leaving the rest to atrophy. Much of the current gameplay mechanics is locked in legacy mode that it is very hard for many of the above to thrive. Trust is hard due to the crude mechanics. The closest I've seen cooperative play in action is the incursion community. It's pretty popular once you get the hang of it - sometimes with random acts that totally goes against the EVE's "kill or be killed" motif. Drama pops out now and then (or this isn't really EVE), but by whole, the cooperation hammered by random players (who are strangers to each other) in the BTL/TDF agreements is a testament - that given the right environment, you can get random people to cooperate for the greater good. Making them hide their knives (temporarily) and having them play nice is fairly refreshing Hire/consult non-Western game designers. The differences in creative ideas and insights will be the incubator to a better EVE for the future. When you source your ideas from only one hemisphere, the results are generally blander.

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.