Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
675
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 09:22:16 -
[61] - Quote
For something so "big" the awox section of zkillboard is surprising static compared to the rest of it (and also muddied by consentual corp on corp violence.).
At time of posting page 1 of awox goes back to 21:26 11th Jan. Page 1 of actual killboard goes back 19 minutes. |
Sladislov
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
53
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 09:40:43 -
[62] - Quote
Amount of Jewish people in the middle east are also insignificant to the amount of Arabic people,
are you saying we should eradicate the jews too?
let me rephrase this,
Just because less people are doing a certain thing does not mean you can just remove something.
-á-á-á-á-á-á Sladislov
Director of Silly semantics
-á-á-á-á-á-áBroksi Kurth
-á-á xXxBlack LegionxXx
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
725
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 09:48:55 -
[63] - Quote
I guess the most important question now is. Do I need the director role to "flip the switch"?
It seams that reverse Awoxing is still ok.
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Sladislov
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
53
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 09:59:28 -
[64] - Quote
And if it keeps reverse awoxing alive, they still havent fixed being 'safe' when you join a corp.
-á-á-á-á-á-á Sladislov
Director of Silly semantics
-á-á-á-á-á-áBroksi Kurth
-á-á xXxBlack LegionxXx
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
3618
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 10:06:51 -
[65] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post and the one quoting it.
The Rules: 6. Racism and discrimination are prohibited.
Racism, gender stereotyping and hate speech are not permitted on the EVE Online Forums. Derogatory posting that includes race, religion or sexual preference based personal attacks and trolling can result in immediate suspension of forum posting privileges.
ISD Ezwal
Vice Admiral
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
|
Sladislov
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
54
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 10:09:57 -
[66] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote:I have removed a rule breaking post and the one quoting it. The Rules:6. Racism and discrimination are prohibited.
Racism, gender stereotyping and hate speech are not permitted on the EVE Online Forums. Derogatory posting that includes race, religion or sexual preference based personal attacks and trolling can result in immediate suspension of forum posting privileges.
I'm sorry, it wasnt meant as a derogatory remark, i merely wanted to illustrate that just because something is a minority it doesnt automatically mean that i can be removed without consequences. It was a neutral statement.
-á-á-á-á-á-á Sladislov
Director of Silly semantics
-á-á-á-á-á-áBroksi Kurth
-á-á xXxBlack LegionxXx
|
Sladislov
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
54
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 10:17:22 -
[67] - Quote
Aiyshimin wrote:Sladislov wrote:
[offensive analogy]
let me rephrase this,
Just because less people are doing a certain thing does not mean you can just remove something.
And just because less people are doing a certain thing does not mean it should be preserved, if the thing itself is being a total dickhead. Your analogy is both batshit ******** and painfully accurate at the same time btw, too bad you're way too ignorant to figure it out.
Yes instead of providing a good argument just shout ignorance and the discussion is won.
" Just because less people are doing a certain thing does not mean you can just remove something."
Does not mean
"And just because less people are doing a certain thing does not mean it should be preserved"
3/10 please work on your reading comprehension
-á-á-á-á-á-á Sladislov
Director of Silly semantics
-á-á-á-á-á-áBroksi Kurth
-á-á xXxBlack LegionxXx
|
Aiyshimin
Shiva Furnace
334
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 10:40:35 -
[68] - Quote
Sladislov wrote: Yes instead of providing a good argument just shout ignorance and the discussion is won.
" Just because less people are doing a certain thing does not mean you can just remove something."
Does not mean
"And just because less people are doing a certain thing does not mean it should be preserved"
3/10 please work on your reading comprehension
Good arguments stopped before your ignorant reply.
Making hisec safaries more difficult (no, this change does not prevent it, only means that awoxers need to put in effort and time) concerns a minority group of hisec players, for the benefit of majority of players in hisec and potential subscribers. Since it's in CCP's interests to cater to the needs of the majority in order to keep their business, it's rational and reasonable decision for them.
Hisec awoxing just wasn't good for the game, and that's the long and short if it.
|
Sladislov
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
54
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 10:52:55 -
[69] - Quote
Aiyshimin wrote:Sladislov wrote: Yes instead of providing a good argument just shout ignorance and the discussion is won.
" Just because less people are doing a certain thing does not mean you can just remove something."
Does not mean
"And just because less people are doing a certain thing does not mean it should be preserved"
3/10 please work on your reading comprehension
Good arguments stopped before your ignorant reply. Making hisec safaries more difficult (no, this change does not prevent it, only means that awoxers need to put in effort and time) concerns a minority group of hisec players, for the benefit of majority of players in hisec and potential subscribers. Since it's in CCP's interests to cater to the needs of the majority in order to keep their business, it's rational and reasonable decision for them. Hisec awoxing just wasn't good for the game, and that's the long and short if it.
"Good arguments stopped before your ignorant reply."
aka
"haha i didnt even try lololol"
How do you mean it doesnt prevent highsec safari's, they are literally removing corp damage. Only way to kill someone in highsec after the change is wardecs or suicide ganking.
Yes lets benefit the majority, increase mission payouts by 100x making all other professions irrelevant, you only need to care about the majority right?
-á-á-á-á-á-á Sladislov
Director of Silly semantics
-á-á-á-á-á-áBroksi Kurth
-á-á xXxBlack LegionxXx
|
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
3271
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 11:04:02 -
[70] - Quote
Sladislov wrote:Post after post of logically flawed, hysterical drivel
Please study this and learn how you too can stop shitposting.
|
|
Aiyshimin
Shiva Furnace
334
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 11:04:49 -
[71] - Quote
Sladislov wrote: "Good arguments stopped before your ignorant reply."
aka
"haha i didnt even try lololol"
How do you mean it doesnt prevent highsec safari's, they are literally removing corp damage. Only way to kill someone in highsec after the change is wardecs or suicide ganking.
Yes lets benefit the majority, increase mission payouts by 100x making all other professions irrelevant, you only need to care about the majority right?
When you troll, you get trolled, deal with it.
No, you infiltrate the corp just as before, play your role until you get director role, turn off intra-corp PVP block and then awox. And rob them.
Increasing mission payouts 100x would not benefit the majority, it would break the game for everyone. Why do you think increasing mission payouts 100x is the same thing as making awoxing more difficult?
Tell me again, are you using the fact that awoxers are a minority group as an argument defending it's existence? Does this minority aspect apply to other playstyles as well?
|
Velicitia
XS Tech
2774
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 11:09:59 -
[72] - Quote
Caleb Seremshur wrote:Dersen Lowery wrote:Didn't Awox just get on grid with anomaly-running corpmates, light a cyno, and suddenly reds? Meaning that the whole scheme relied on people out of corp, and this change wouldn't affect it at all?
If anything, it would make that tactic more effective, because the no-corp-aggression flag would give the impression of increased safety. AWOX started out in amarr militia dunking people in caldari militia because he appears as a purple and used that to his advantage, also only standings loss with caldari (which didn't matter because he was amarr). Where he went after that who knows but it was just another example of poorly thought out game mechanics. 'high sec awoxing' was years overdue for an overhaul, it was basically an exploit.
learn your EVE history ... awoxing has been around far, far longer than FW. Hell, it was "history" back in '07.
One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia
|
Kenrailae
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
327
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 11:22:39 -
[73] - Quote
Yeah.... Friendly fire should always be a thing. We're playing Eve, not WoW.
The Law is a point of View
|
Sladislov
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
54
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 11:23:00 -
[74] - Quote
Aiyshimin wrote: No, you infiltrate the corp just as before, play your role until you get director role, turn off intra-corp PVP block and then awox. And rob them.
Tell me again, are you using the fact that awoxers are a minority group as an argument defending it's existence? Does this minority aspect apply to other playstyles as well?
"No, you infiltrate the corp just as before, play your role until you get director role, turn off intra-corp PVP block and then awox. And rob them. "
yes let me just waste large swathes of my time playing in this corp i dont really want to be in in order to get director maybe some time next year. This is not viable.
I wasnt saying that it being a minority should make it immune to being removed, what i said was ' just because its a minority doesnt mean it can or should be removed so easily '
-á-á-á-á-á-á Sladislov
Director of Silly semantics
-á-á-á-á-á-áBroksi Kurth
-á-á xXxBlack LegionxXx
|
Aiyshimin
Shiva Furnace
334
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 11:24:52 -
[75] - Quote
Kenrailae wrote:Yeah.... Friendly fire should always be a thing. We're playing Eve, not WoW.
You can still fire on friendlies in null, low, whs and in hisec corps that allow it.
If you want to do that, don't join hisec corps that don't allow it. Simple as that.
|
Aiyshimin
Shiva Furnace
334
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 11:27:10 -
[76] - Quote
Sladislov wrote:
yes let me just waste large swathes of my time playing in this corp i dont really want to be in in order to get director maybe some time next year. This is not viable.
I wasnt saying that it being a minority should make it immune to being removed, what i said was ' just because its a minority doesnt mean it can or should be removed so easily '
Why waste your time in a corp that you really don't want to be in? Do something else you like more.
If a change benefits the majority and only presents a minor hindrance to a niche group, then it's a sensible balancing change. I think you agree on that.
|
Sladislov
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
54
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 11:29:07 -
[77] - Quote
Aiyshimin wrote:Sladislov wrote:
yes let me just waste large swathes of my time playing in this corp i dont really want to be in in order to get director maybe some time next year. This is not viable.
I wasnt saying that it being a minority should make it immune to being removed, what i said was ' just because its a minority doesnt mean it can or should be removed so easily '
Why waste your time in a corp that you really don't want to be in? Do something else you like more. If a change benefits the majority and only presents a minor hindrance to a niche group, then it's a sensible balancing change. I think you agree on that.
Its not a 'minor hindrance' its a complete removal of awox as it is now.
I want to be in the corp to kill their ships
-á-á-á-á-á-á Sladislov
Director of Silly semantics
-á-á-á-á-á-áBroksi Kurth
-á-á xXxBlack LegionxXx
|
Aiyshimin
Shiva Furnace
334
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 11:42:20 -
[78] - Quote
Sladislov wrote:
Its not a 'minor hindrance' its a complete removal of awox as it is now.
I want to be in the corp to kill their ships
No, it's not a complete removal when you can still do it.
Also, nothing prevents you from getting in their corp and killing their ships.
You don't even have to join their corp.
|
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
3271
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 12:11:35 -
[79] - Quote
Nobody said that you will be unable to target and fire upon friendly ships when this toggle is turned off. All it does is provoke a CONCORD response.
Furthermore, it's not as if every single highsec corp will turn it off.
Regardless of all that, however, if you're not willing to put in the time and effort for a successful awox, you don't deserve those kills - period. |
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
675
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 12:45:00 -
[80] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:Nobody said that you will be unable to target and fire upon friendly ships when this toggle is turned off. All it does is provoke a CONCORD response.
Furthermore, it's not as if every single highsec corp will turn it off.
Regardless of all that, however, if you're not willing to put in the time and effort for a successful awox, you don't deserve those kills - period.
But I should be able to kill a corp mate risk free in a random bit of space with my neutral RR alts in case my ship is at any risk.....
Even CODE man up and accept the concord hit. I never thought I'd hold them in higher regard than some people....but there we go. Wow. |
|
Kenrailae
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
328
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 12:56:43 -
[81] - Quote
Aiyshimin wrote:Kenrailae wrote:Yeah.... Friendly fire should always be a thing. We're playing Eve, not WoW. You can still fire on friendlies in null, low, whs and in hisec corps that allow it. If you want to do that, don't join hisec corps that don't allow it. Simple as that.
Not a thing. Simple as that.
The Law is a point of View
|
Faren Shalni
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
124
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 13:04:24 -
[82] - Quote
Tbh I feel ccp are not going to have it so you can't even shoot you corpmates in highsec. It will likley come in the form of if you want to shoot him there will be concequences to your actions such as suspect timers or even concord......
Still I think it's a bad decision to remove AWOXing as it is part of what makes EVE eve
So Much Space
|
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
675
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 13:05:20 -
[83] - Quote
It's already not a thing in NPC corps. CCP want to make player corps more attractive. And no, allowing awoxing in NPC corps wouldn't be a good idea, ever.
I strongly suspect those falling for this would fall for a fake duel too. I doubt much of value has been lost - except the completely new ganker who is impossible to vet correctly and thus barred from decent corps - which is the very bar ccp wants to lift.... |
Stacy Lone
University of Caille Gallente Federation
43
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 14:40:08 -
[84] - Quote
Capqu wrote: This would remove corp awoxing in nullsec as well as highsec, which I'm sure isn't the intention.
It is the intention, and it's fine.
Corps need more way to protect themselves from awoxing. being paranoid and not letting members in until you know their mother, dog and medical records is not fun.
It especially does not retain new players.
There is ways to grief in EVE, and it's fine. Want to gank someone? Go for it. There is a simple counter to it: Tank your ship and don#t transport to many goods.
Shooting a corp member in space: Not fun, as one can not shield himself against it. there is no counter, except playing alone. Playing alone isn't fun, so people leave.
People need to be able to play together without getting wrecked by a single awoxer 8at least in high sec - if you want to shoot corp mates in low/null, do it, but you can do that after this change anyways).
Awoxing shouldn#t be removed - at least not entirely. But there are forms of awoxing that have gotten way out of control. everything needs to have a counter, and this is a counter against one form of awoxing. If people don't play together, they have little reason to stay in the game.
The over-abundance of awoxing and scamming is what hinders EVE, not what brings it forward.
If you enter low or null sec, you get a warning that it's dangerous. You can balance risk vs. reward. You doN#t need to go there if you doN#t want the risk, and if you go there you can use scouts and prepare yourself against getting killed. Use a covops or ceptor to stay out of trouble, for example.
But getting in a corp to play together with someone else shoud not pose an immediate risk to you. It just drives ppl. away. I know of many ppl who really like EVE, but just want to be able to play together with others, and don't want all that paranoid crap. They all have no problem with risk and wouldn#t mind getting blown up in low or null. But if you can#t even get into a high sec corp to get to know others and find ppl to play with without alway thinking about how you could loose your ship to the corpmate that nearby any moment, then it's not fun anymore, it just drags down.
I don#t say that AWOXing should be impossible. If you give someone access to your corp wallet and he empties it: Your fault. But basic player interaction inside a corp should be possible without any immediate danger.
Currently, it is safer to stay in an NPC corp then tpo go into a player corp. That discourages teamplay. Discouraging teamplay has never been healthy for an MMO, ever.
|
Hairpins Blueprint
CBC Interstellar Fidelas Constans
124
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 14:41:55 -
[85] - Quote
Capqu wrote:This was announced on stream. The option to disable friendly fire for your corp.
This would remove corp awoxing in nullsec as well as highsec, which I'm sure isn't the intention.
i mean like how? in null sec you just shoot and thats it ... there is no concord o_O? |
Hairpins Blueprint
CBC Interstellar Fidelas Constans
124
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 14:43:30 -
[86] - Quote
it's good thing for hi sec, corps will be much more open for people |
Sladislov
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
58
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 14:53:04 -
[87] - Quote
Stacy Lone wrote: It is the intention, and it's fine.
Corps need more way to protect themselves from awoxing. being paranoid and not letting members in until you know their mother, dog and medical records is not fun.
It especially does not retain new players.
There is ways to grief in EVE, and it's fine. Want to gank someone? Go for it. There is a simple counter to it: Tank your ship and don#t transport to many goods.
Shooting a corp member in space: Not fun, as one can not shield himself against it. there is no counter, except playing alone. Playing alone isn't fun, so people leave.
People need to be able to play together without getting wrecked by a single awoxer 8at least in high sec - if you want to shoot corp mates in low/null, do it, but you can do that after this change anyways).
Awoxing shouldn#t be removed - at least not entirely. But there are forms of awoxing that have gotten way out of control. everything needs to have a counter, and this is a counter against one form of awoxing. If people don't play together, they have little reason to stay in the game.
The over-abundance of awoxing and scamming is what hinders EVE, not what brings it forward.
If you enter low or null sec, you get a warning that it's dangerous. You can balance risk vs. reward. You doN#t need to go there if you doN#t want the risk, and if you go there you can use scouts and prepare yourself against getting killed. Use a covops or ceptor to stay out of trouble, for example.
But getting in a corp to play together with someone else shoud not pose an immediate risk to you. It just drives ppl. away. I know of many ppl who really like EVE, but just want to be able to play together with others, and don't want all that paranoid crap. They all have no problem with risk and wouldn#t mind getting blown up in low or null. But if you can#t even get into a high sec corp to get to know others and find ppl to play with without alway thinking about how you could loose your ship to the corpmate that nearby any moment, then it's not fun anymore, it just drags down.
I don#t say that AWOXing should be impossible. If you give someone access to your corp wallet and he empties it: Your fault. But basic player interaction inside a corp should be possible without any immediate danger.
Currently, it is safer to stay in an NPC corp then tpo go into a player corp. That discourages teamplay. Discouraging teamplay has never been healthy for an MMO, ever.
How do you mean?
All you need to do to keep out an awoxer is just check his killboard and/or ask for his api, if he has suspicious activity then you just dont let him in.
Only stupid people get awoxed. There are a myriad of ways to stop awoxing, and with the introduction of the 'expel' option all you need to do once you know someone will awox or already awoxed and is in your corp is to just hit a button and wait a day.
-á-á-á-á-á-á Sladislov
Director of Silly semantics
-á-á-á-á-á-áBroksi Kurth
-á-á xXxBlack LegionxXx
|
Kenrailae
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
328
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 14:57:35 -
[88] - Quote
Lol. The counter to awoxing is to impose artificial restraints on the game is it? ha ha. Not kill the awoxer back?
wow....
The Law is a point of View
|
Sladislov
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
58
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 15:02:33 -
[89] - Quote
Kenrailae wrote:Lol. The counter to awoxing is to impose artificial restraints on the game is it? ha ha. Not kill the awoxer back?
wow....
As if any of these highsec pubs have ever pvp'd before
-á-á-á-á-á-á Sladislov
Director of Silly semantics
-á-á-á-á-á-áBroksi Kurth
-á-á xXxBlack LegionxXx
|
Kenrailae
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
328
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 15:05:15 -
[90] - Quote
Sladislov wrote:Kenrailae wrote:Lol. The counter to awoxing is to impose artificial restraints on the game is it? ha ha. Not kill the awoxer back?
wow.... As if any of these highsec pubs have ever pvp'd before
Good time to learn.
The Law is a point of View
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |