Oh so calling them kadeshit was actually a display of wit and not "attempting to attack by acting like a child".

Well, thanks for that clarification.

Zappity please lay off the ph koolaid.

Mate, if you can't see the distinction between making a play on a groups name - which literally everyone in EVE does - and utterly refusing to move on from the past out of some sense of butthurt over whatever triggered you in the past then that's really no helping you understand. Either way, it continues to amuse me every time some dweeb starts rattling on about the CFC.

And go back to actually needing to commit something of value to actually attack it too?

Mate, if you can't see the distinction between making a play on a groups name - which literally everyone in EVE does - and utterly refusing to move on from the past out of some sense of butthurt over whatever triggered you in the past then that's really no helping you understand. Either way, it continues to amuse me every time some dweeb starts rattling on about the CFC.

I can think of something worse than wishing you could have your old enemy back, which is wishing you could have EVE as it was two expansions ago.

Are those TEARS? Why yes they are.

You are being very nasty in this thread. Were I of similar ilk I would point out that CO2 just figured out how to reduce sov timers. :)

Xeno I don't want to say anything disheartening but yeah.

As for anyone else with a hateboner problem that can never be fixed, *yawn.*

It's worth mentioning though, the defectors as of late are from the CFC era and share the CFC is Real mindset. Blawrf in particular openly disagreed with the Imperium changeover and is pretty much a hanger-on to the idea that the CFC still exists.

It's not dishertining for me If i'm in that means the bad guys are in and lets face it everyone ont he otherside is the bad guy even if you don;t dislike them. its the nature of war. And i smile as i relise that everything i'm in there in and vice versa. As for entosis mechanics shooting an I hub is the same as entosising to me so no real diffrance. Just a diffrant way of pervoking the fight.,

What I had on my mind was the messy / bloody changes coming to capital gameplay.

I've been told that within GSF, if you lose a capital on official business, it gets replaced.

As for you guys, from what I can tell the conensus regarding capital losses is "we don't take losses."

Only if you have literally no idea what tears are. Got anything constructive to add to the conversation?

I don't understand why nodes have to spawn all over a constellation. It would be more conducive to the large single-grid battles everyone enjoys if it was just that structure (Ihub or TCU) that needed X number of entosis miinutes applied to it.

If you require players travel all over a constellation, you can potentially have a standoffish node hacking race that actually isn't satisfying.

Get rid of whack-a-mole.

I think it could work. It just needs a more extensive UI to help fleet commanders know what's going on.

Oh you mean like crying all over the forums because one of your meat shields doesn't want to play with you anymore?

Because if someone disrupts your little farmland you go into tears and cry to change game mechanics.

As far as goons go, reduced sov timers seems to be taking care of itself.

By the time the war is over, they might not even have to worry at all.

/thread. MBC are managing the issue already.

Spreading the fights out was a deliberate decision. There was acknowledgement from both players and devs that, while impressive for headlines, enormous fleet battles were often terrible to participate in.

It was a deliberate decision to move away from requiring a single point of conflict to a more distributed model.