Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33490
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 14:29:24 -
[451] - Quote
Dude you sound really awesome but the reality is evemeet.jpg
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|

Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
7447
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 14:33:19 -
[452] - Quote
Aiwha wrote:You don't have to sov mine the nodes. They'll automatically win for the defender after 1H30M. So you just have to fly around killing people doing the entosis work. If you put half the effort you put whining on the forums into defending your space, maybe Bastion and LAWN wouldn't be homeless right now. Now you're just being ridiculous. Yeah, we'll just let the nodes idle, that's sure to win. I get that you like the mechanics being in your favour, so I can see why you're getting so defensive over the idea of CCP actually fixing them, but those of us that actually like to enjoy the game can see that they are pretty dire. Remember, you only like them because you don't actually want to hold sov. If you did I guarantee after a few serious attacks you'd be jumping right on the same bandwagon.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
|

Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
558
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 14:57:41 -
[453] - Quote
Aiwha wrote:You don't have to sov mine the nodes. They'll automatically win for the defender after 1H30M. So you just have to fly around killing people doing the entosis work. If you put half the effort you put whining on the forums into defending your space, maybe Bastion and LAWN wouldn't be homeless right now. ...and SMA...and FCON...and TNT...and RAZOR
but what would I know, I'm just a salvager
|

Andrew Urbina
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
0
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 15:05:39 -
[454] - Quote
Pandemic Horde is recruiting. |

Aiwha
Infinite Point Violence of Action.
1056
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 15:08:00 -
[455] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Aiwha wrote:You don't have to sov mine the nodes. They'll automatically win for the defender after 1H30M. So you just have to fly around killing people doing the entosis work. If you put half the effort you put whining on the forums into defending your space, maybe Bastion and LAWN wouldn't be homeless right now.  Now you're just being ridiculous. Yeah, we'll just let the nodes idle, that's sure to win. I get that you like the mechanics being in your favour, so I can see why you're getting so defensive over the idea of CCP actually fixing them, but those of us that actually like to enjoy the game can see that they are pretty dire. Remember, you only like them because you don't actually want to hold sov. If you did I guarantee after a few serious attacks you'd be jumping right on the same bandwagon.
I literally hold sov right now.
So does The Culture. We actually fight each other over sov on a semi-regular basis. Because we're not ****.
Sanity is fun leaving the body.
|

Mario Putzo
1567
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 16:09:36 -
[456] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Barrogh Habalu wrote:To be honest, so far the only thing that was established is that you are uncomfortable defending your space. Current levels of offensive action aside (anyone would be in trouble in such situation), I don't think that your ability to keep space under your flag in the long run means that your are not overextending. I was under impression that doing so comfortably would be a sign of "proper" size. Which of course is inversely proportional to amount of people you pissed off enough that they drop anything fun they were doing and go camp/sovlaser your systems instead. It's a simple case of numbers, when you have over a thousand enemies drop into your space and you have a 150 man fleet to defend, it's not overextension if you lose space. If we were overextended we wouldn't be able to defend against even a balanced attack, which clearly we were able to do. It's pretty simple to understand, if you have 1000 people in a single system and a 2000 man fleet flies in and roflstomps you, you didn't lose because you were overextended.
Seems odd to hear a CFC member complain about overwhelming numbers. Why just over 6 months ago CFC was employing this exact same tactic in Providence to "prove" to CCP that an overwhelming force could just take what they wanted with impunity....then they proceeded to get roflstomped out by ProviBloc over 2 weeks. Difference of course being ProvidBloc actually actively defended their space against the CFC where as CFC is just abandoning regions en mass then whining about it later. |

Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
7447
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 16:17:12 -
[457] - Quote
Aiwha wrote:I literally hold sov right now.
So does The Culture. We actually fight each other over sov on a semi-regular basis. Because we're not ****. Hold it simply because it's available no doubt. And no, if you fight each other on a regular basis and have made not steps towards actually defeating each other you're either specifically aiming not to involve sov mechanics (thus proving the point that they are boring) or you are in fact ****. I'm actually betting it's the former.
Mario Putzo wrote:Seems odd to hear a CFC member complain about overwhelming numbers. Why just over 6 months ago CFC was employing this exact same tactic in Providence to "prove" to CCP that an overwhelming force could just take what they wanted with impunity....then they proceeded to get roflstomped out by ProviBloc over 2 weeks. Difference of course being ProvidBloc actually actively defended their space against the CFC where as CFC is just abandoning regions en mass then whining about it later. Hey, don;t get me wrong I've got nothing against overwhelming numbers, and I have no problem losing space to a bigger group rolling in, I just disagree with the notion that losing space is proof of being overextended, and I wish the game was entertaining when defending a region rather than being force to mine structures rather than just fight. Sov should be a byproduct of playing the game and fighting each other, not a fixed, timer based mechanic.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
|

Morrigan LeSante
Black Omega Security The OSS
1361
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 16:28:03 -
[458] - Quote
M-O was massively entertaining because you contested it; almost won too. The reason you're all bored now and crying about it, is because you won't come out to play.
Naturally station spinning is boring. |

Aiwha
Infinite Point Violence of Action.
1057
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 16:28:09 -
[459] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Aiwha wrote:I literally hold sov right now.
So does The Culture. We actually fight each other over sov on a semi-regular basis. Because we're not ****. Hold it simply because it's available no doubt. And no, if you fight each other on a regular basis and have made not steps towards actually defeating each other you're either specifically aiming not to involve sov mechanics (thus proving the point that they are boring) or you are in fact ****. I'm actually betting it's the former. Mario Putzo wrote:Seems odd to hear a CFC member complain about overwhelming numbers. Why just over 6 months ago CFC was employing this exact same tactic in Providence to "prove" to CCP that an overwhelming force could just take what they wanted with impunity....then they proceeded to get roflstomped out by ProviBloc over 2 weeks. Difference of course being ProvidBloc actually actively defended their space against the CFC where as CFC is just abandoning regions en mass then whining about it later. Hey, don;t get me wrong I've got nothing against overwhelming numbers, and I have no problem losing space to a bigger group rolling in, I just disagree with the notion that losing space is proof of being overextended, and I wish the game was entertaining when defending a region rather than being force to mine structures rather than just fight. Sov should be a byproduct of playing the game and fighting each other, not a fixed, timer based mechanic.
We got paid to stop fighting each other and come **** on you. Which we gladly took because we both despise your leadership. After we roll you we'll probably get back to slapping each other silly. Again, this all comes down to you getting dogpiled because your coalitions diplomacy is absolute ****.
Sanity is fun leaving the body.
|

Neuntausend
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
879
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 16:49:42 -
[460] - Quote
Aiwha wrote:We got paid to stop fighting each other and come **** on you. Which we gladly took because we both despise your leadership. After we roll you we'll probably get back to slapping each other silly. Again, this all comes down to you getting dogpiled because your coalitions diplomacy is absolute ****.
Our diplomacy isn't any more **** than some of your bigger "allies". The main difference is that they gave up their territories last year without even trying to defend it once in Aegis sov, because like us, they already knew the new system would be kind of terrible, and unlike us they don't have the perseverance to even try. |
|

Akballah Kassan
Flames Of Chaos Mordus Angels
86
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 17:44:33 -
[461] - Quote
Waded through this thread and I'd had my own thoughts.
Our Alliance entosis things to provoke fights. Before everybody dog piled into fighting The Imperium/CFC we rarely got a decent fight because Goons would just drop Super caps on us, to which we have no counter. They never looked for fun fights and to be fair if that's how they roll and their line members are happy with that then I can't complain.
Imperium was vastly over extended and even Mitten's acknowledges this. Whilst I can understand his call to fall back (a bit like the USSR did in WW II) it must be disheartening to other alliances knowing 'their' space is probably gone forever.
Since the great war has kicked in we have had some great little fights with Imperium over sov in Pure Blind and because they are too scared now to drop supers (or if Mittens is to be believed it is a tactic to deny content) we have actually managed to take four systems! Now I'm not naive enough to believe we could ever hold it if things revert to previous conditions but the target is there for Imperium to attack but they won't - they are just hoping blue balling will bore people into defeat.
As for SMA, the same O.P is crying on another thread about the threat from a lone entosising Condor, explaining how they all have to dock up, wait for an FC to form a fleet to go and kill the menace! If one entosising Condor is such a threat no wonder your empire is crumbling!
As for the actual sov mechanics - sov-wanding isn't the best game play but it's better then the old super blob wins sov we had before. Also, nothing will stop boredom and burn out being a tactic used in sov warfare no matter what system you use. Nobody is going to suicide fleets against an enemy they know they can't beat and attackers who don't get a fight will have to put up with the boredom that entails.
Finally, Lucas's complaints about nobody being able to go on deployment any more because they have to constantly defend their own space - surely that's a good thing? Why should you be able to go on vacation to kick over somebody else's sand castle, safe in the knowledge your own sand castle is safe while you do it?
|

Aiwha
Infinite Point Violence of Action.
1059
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 18:25:54 -
[462] - Quote
Neuntausend wrote:Aiwha wrote:We got paid to stop fighting each other and come **** on you. Which we gladly took because we both despise your leadership. After we roll you we'll probably get back to slapping each other silly. Again, this all comes down to you getting dogpiled because your coalitions diplomacy is absolute ****. Our diplomacy isn't any more **** than some of your bigger "allies". The main difference is that they gave up their territories last year without even trying to defend it once in Aegis sov, because like us, they already knew the new system would be kind of terrible, and unlike us they don't have the perseverance to even try.
No, its because they don't need or want pve space. They subsist entirely on local moongoo where they live and their rather substantial warchest from the N3 days (oh god, there is SO much money still laying around from those glory days of slumlording) and AT winnings. And I assume members either incursion or have WH escalation alts or something.
They don't want to hold space. That's not how they want to play the game.
Sanity is fun leaving the body.
|

Neuntausend
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
879
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 18:33:43 -
[463] - Quote
No, they just don't want to put in effort to hold space. They clearly wanted to hold space for years before, otherwise they wouldn't have. |

Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33490
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 18:37:19 -
[464] - Quote
The pain train don't got time for entosis
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|

Aiwha
Infinite Point Violence of Action.
1059
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 18:38:57 -
[465] - Quote
Neuntausend wrote:No, they just don't want to put in effort to hold space. They clearly wanted to hold space for years before, otherwise they wouldn't have.
When renting was a thing. Then renting stopped being a thing.
Sanity is fun leaving the body.
|

Mario Putzo
1568
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 19:49:08 -
[466] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Aiwha wrote: [quote=Mario Putzo]Seems odd to hear a CFC member complain about overwhelming numbers. Why just over 6 months ago CFC was employing this exact same tactic in Providence to "prove" to CCP that an overwhelming force could just take what they wanted with impunity....then they proceeded to get roflstomped out by ProviBloc over 2 weeks. Difference of course being ProvidBloc actually actively defended their space against the CFC where as CFC is just abandoning regions en mass then whining about it later.
Hey, don;t get me wrong I've got nothing against overwhelming numbers, and I have no problem losing space to a bigger group rolling in, I just disagree with the notion that losing space is proof of being overextended, and I wish the game was entertaining when defending a region rather than being force to mine structures rather than just fight. Sov should be a byproduct of playing the game and fighting each other, not a fixed, timer based mechanic.
It absolutely is proof you are over extended though. CFC held at one point 8 regions as a 40K man group. This is ~5K dudes per region. Collectively that looks good on paper since there were no coalitions really capable of threatening the sov of CFC. But again if we look at ProviBloc, they had 15K dudes in one region, and still lost some timers over the brief war vs CFC.
The evidence that CFC was over extended is right there for you if you wish to look at it. Even the leadership of CFC has admitted they were probably holding more space then they could reliably hold, which is why they made no effort to hold Cloud Ring, or Tenal, or Tribute, because it their ability to defend that space was ineffective and their active pilot numbers inefficient for doing so.
By rights CFC should have been holding 3-4 regions, or about half of what they initially held before this conflict started. We know that defense in this situation is possible, ProviBloc has already shown us that 15K man coalition is capable of defending a single region against an overwhelming number of people arrayed against it. Had CFC consolidated into Dek/PB/Fade/Branch their ability to defense those regions would have been much much higher with 10K people per region.
CFC is losing this fight not because MBC has more dudes, not because FozzieSov generates timers, but because they did not have the capacity to defend what they laid claim to, and now it is too late for them to redeploy to save anything, had they consolidated months ago, they would likely have already bled out numbers from MBC because grinding into a defended sov provides much less of a morale boost then steam rolling through 5 regions in two weeks because the occupants would rather run than fight.
TLDR ProviBloc 15K dudes 1 Region, successful defense vs 40K man coalition CFC 40K dudes 8 Regions, abysmal failure vs 50K man coalition
Math isn't hard, 3-4 regions, leaning to the lesser side depending on the quality of you PVP core. Provi has proven with adequate numbers you can defend your space against a much larger foe.
|

Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33490
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 19:51:14 -
[467] - Quote
lol
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|

Neuntausend
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
880
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 20:10:31 -
[468] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:TLDR ProviBloc 15K dudes 1 Region, successful defense vs 40K man coalition CFC 40K dudes 8 Regions, abysmal failure vs 50K man coalition
I'd go out on a limb and say ProviBloc wouldn't have been able to defend had we seriously wanted to invest more than a couple of days and actually claim it, which we didn't (why would we want to take a region at the other end of the cluster after Phoebe).
Also, the Imperium has in no way abysmally failed yet, so I'd recommend waiting with that statement until it has actually happened.
Compared to the Providence campaign, this war is already going much more slowly after having gone on for much longer, and it will slow down even more the more space we lose.
That aside, though, I do agree to a certain level. ADMs in some parts have not exactly been stellar when the storm hit. Deklein has a lot of sixes, and very few systems lower than 4, simply because it's being used by a 17k strong alliance.
So yes, having a 3k Alliance sitting on a regions worth of systems is simply too little people to properly occupy and defend it. |

Zappity
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
2800
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 20:25:49 -
[469] - Quote
This thread has become confused because the situation has changed considerably since it started. The main premise at the beginning was that a powerful entity should not be subject to harassment by a weaker entity through sov mechanics (Horde persecuting SMA). The current situation is that the Imperium is now being attacked by a stronger entity (pretty much the rest of EVE).
Consolidating to a smaller footprint in order to more rapidly respond to light incursions would have worked well a few weeks ago. This would not work now because enough people are attacking that they would simply be overwhelmed regardless of the footprint.
I don't see any logical way past a mechanic whereby a group with superior strength can dominate a weaker one. This is pretty much the whole point of sov warfare - weaker groups can be expelled from their space.
Anything else would be an artificial block to the sandbox. It would be the equivalent of a mechanic which protected Providence from the Imperium incursion last year. The Imperium was stronger and could therefore do it. Now, the Imperium is weaker and cannot defend against the same being done to them.
Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.
|

Neuntausend
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
880
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 20:28:29 -
[470] - Quote
I agree, the situation has changed. But cut the crap about the imperium getting expelled for when you've actually managed to do it, will you? This war is far from over. |
|

Zappity
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
2800
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 20:28:40 -
[471] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:TLDR ProviBloc 15K dudes 1 Region, successful defense vs 40K man coalition CFC 40K dudes 8 Regions, abysmal failure vs 50K man coalition
Math isn't hard, 3-4 regions, leaning to the lesser side depending on the quality of you PVP core. Provi has proven with adequate numbers you can defend your space against a much larger foe.
This is somewhat revisionist. The Imperium could certainly have razed Provi to the ground had they chosen to. They were quite successful with the IHubs. They just chose not to.
Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.
|

Zappity
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
2800
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 20:31:30 -
[472] - Quote
Neuntausend wrote:I agree, the situation has changed. But cut the crap about the imperium getting expelled for when you've actually managed to do it, will you? This war is far from over. By this logic, the Imperium equals goonswarm. Because whilst you are still holding Deklein you are certainly not still holding Vale, Tribute, Fade etc. But I guess those weren't held by GSF so they don't count.
Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
11566
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 20:35:33 -
[473] - Quote
Aiwha wrote:We got paid to stop fighting each other and come **** on you. Which we gladly took because we both despise your leadership. After we roll you we'll probably get back to slapping each other silly. Again, this all comes down to you getting dogpiled because your coalitions diplomacy is absolute ****.
"this isn't about you, it's about your leadership" is a tired cliche and you should feel bad for using it
I'm 99% confident you couldn't name anyone in Imperium leadership beyond The Mittani and Sion
Twitter: @EVEAndski
"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."
-á-á - Abrazzar
|

Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33490
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 20:36:59 -
[474] - Quote
Andski wrote:Aiwha wrote:We got paid to stop fighting each other and come **** on you. Which we gladly took because we both despise your leadership. After we roll you we'll probably get back to slapping each other silly. Again, this all comes down to you getting dogpiled because your coalitions diplomacy is absolute ****. "this isn't about you, it's about your leadership" is a tired cliche and you should feel bad for using it I'm 99% confident you couldn't name anyone in Imperium leadership beyond The Mittani and Sion Ha trick question it's ALL mittens and Sion.
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|

Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33490
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 20:37:54 -
[475] - Quote
Mostly Sion.
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|

Neuntausend
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
881
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 21:46:51 -
[476] - Quote
Zappity wrote:Neuntausend wrote:I agree, the situation has changed. But cut the crap about the imperium getting expelled for when you've actually managed to do it, will you? This war is far from over. By this logic, the Imperium equals goonswarm. Because whilst you are still holding Deklein you are certainly not still holding Vale, Tribute, Fade etc. But I guess those weren't held by GSF so they don't count.
The Imperium has lost quite a lot of space, this is true. I just don't consider that an abysmal failure in the face of a force superior in numbers and grr. In a war like this, space will be lost. It would be an abysmal failure for the attacking side were it not so. Don't think in individual alliances, because that's not what we are - the Imperium is a coalition and should be seen as one. As long as at least one Imperium alliance still holds space, all members of the Imperium will have a place to stay.
edit: We also still hold most of the regions you listed. They certainly are on fire, but you have not taken them just yet. |

Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
7447
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 21:55:55 -
[477] - Quote
Aiwha wrote:Grr gons hat gons. I see what you are saying bro.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
|

Mr Mieyli
Hedion University Amarr Empire
296
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 22:00:16 -
[478] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Aiwha wrote:Grr gons hat gons. Boo boo hoo
You guys are funny, I'm having a great time watching the replies in this thread
A case for more AoE in EvE
|

Neuntausend
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
881
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 22:04:58 -
[479] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:Andski wrote:I'm 99% confident you couldn't name anyone in Imperium leadership beyond The Mittani and Sion Ha trick question it's ALL mittens and Sion.
I find this guy with the hat disturbing. He's a leader, right? |

Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
7447
|
Posted - 2016.04.04 22:07:40 -
[480] - Quote
Akballah Kassan wrote:Waded through this thread and I'd had my own thoughts. *Looks at alliance tag* I seriously doubt that.
Akballah Kassan wrote:Our Alliance entosis things to provoke fights. Before everybody dog piled into fighting The Imperium/CFC we rarely got a decent fight because Goons would just drop Super caps on us, to which we have no counter. They never looked for fun fights and to be fair if that's how they roll and their line members are happy with that then I can't complain. If that were true you'd fight. As your overlord Gevlon has stated, since you've started entosising your stats have drastically reduced. Let's face it, you entosis some stuff to try to feel relevant then bomb yourselves at a gate. This is pretty much the entertainment you add (and you are very good at that so don't stop).
Akballah Kassan wrote:Imperium was vastly over extended and even Mitten's acknowledges this. Whilst I can understand his call to fall back (a bit like the USSR did in WW II) it must be disheartening to other alliances knowing 'their' space is probably gone forever. Not overextended so much as needing to focus our defenses because of the sheer number of players that are coming in. We certainly haven't lost any of our space forever since there's absolutely no way you guys are going to be able to either stay blue or continue this war for the years it would take to win it.
Akballah Kassan wrote:As for SMA, the same O.P is crying on another thread about the threat from a lone entosising Condor, explaining how they all have to dock up, wait for an FC to form a fleet to go and kill the menace! If one entosising Condor is such a threat no wonder your empire is crumbling! He may be, but that doesn't mean that right here he doesn't have a point. Entosis is boring.
Akballah Kassan wrote:As for the actual sov mechanics - sov-wanding isn't the best game play but it's better then the old super blob wins sov we had before. Also, nothing will stop boredom and burn out being a tactic used in sov warfare no matter what system you use. Nobody is going to suicide fleets against an enemy they know they can't beat and attackers who don't get a fight will have to put up with the boredom that entails. But it's the same. You realise the only reason you are making a dent is because you are now in a blob lol.
"Finally, Lucas's complaints about nobody being able to go on deployment any more because they have to constantly defend their own space - surely that's a good thing? Why should you be able to go on vacation to kick over somebody else's sand castle, safe in the knowledge your own sand castle is safe while you do it?" Why should sov holders be able to attack each other? I pretty much think that's the idea of the game mate. Holding sov shouldn't just mean you are trapped having to stand guard day in day out because any randoms with a sovwand can come and screw up the ADMs. If they are supposed to just defend then there should definitely be better defensive bonuses, as at the moment it seems like holding sov is more like a noose than anything else.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |