Faceroll is a WoWism that came from when Hunters were so OP a player actually remapped his entire keyboard to a macro that set the 'perfect' shooting rotation on a Boss target and he [literally rolled his face across the keyboard the whole fight and took top DPS doing it. I'm not sure if the video is the original version of the term or a demonstration of it.

I don't know if anything in EVE that is 'faceroll' worthy. AFK mining is a reality but it's not the same thing as faceroll combat. The closest I can think of is the 'F1 monkey' term. I can't relate to that term because I'm busy as heck in a fight so it's far more than F1-F6 for me, it's a lot of clicking, tracking changes, etc. I'm probably inefficient but the flow works for me right now.

Look guys, please don't let this devolve further than it has.

Miners and haulers have valid play styles. CCP could do a lot more to make it more fun and entertaining for them. This would involve a change to the nature of mining and make it more active, like having asteroids that slowly reduce yield the closer it gets to 'zero' so you'd always be scanning and moving to the juiciest target. Same goes with hauling. You could have hauling drones, which would be nothing more than sensor drones with jump capabilities. You jump one ahead of you and keep one trailing behind you. This way you don't need an alt to clear the way, or make combat ones with AI so they could auto engage gankers bumping you without triggering Concord on you, but maybe they still show up and wipe out the drone. This way Concord has been effectively 'summoned' to wherever you are for the cost of a drone. Concord could charge the hauler a fee for 'disturbing the peace' and if the hauler does it a second time, they take a portion of the haul as a penalty eventually emptying the loot pinata making it less gank worthy but at least the hauler doesn't lose the ship. Even the gankers could change the nature of their play and say "Hey, we have you cold. Give us half your haul and we'll escort you the rest of the way to make sure you get there safe." The hauler loses some but not all, and keeps the ship. The gankers only get half if the ship is torched anyway, so it's about as close to a win-win as there is in EVE PvP. The point is there are a ton of ways to make the game more interesting all the way around without hurting any particular play style.

If you are going to push for changes in EVE, make sure they have little to no impact on other play styles. No style is superior to another one.

M8ners and haulers do hire our services to escort or protect their assets.

This is a great gif. Made me laugh!

Thanks!

5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive, and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.

No point flogging a dead horse so I flogged it in another way

Yes, but it would be better if you just do that in private instead of all over the forum.

That would clash with his need to expose his ego and how knowledgable he is.

Yes, and that's perfectly fine and one of many things that could happen for protection. The miners (and admitted rare haulers) that come and pitch a fit here about how dangerous HiSec is are the ones that need to relax and start hiring your services.

You really just prove my point.
If you weren't so easily baitable and predictable, you would have chuckled and skipped it...

You and Jenn have a lot in common. :)

Not so much, I only say what I have done in game when challenged, but that makes me the same as that other windbag, well if you say so. But in these forums one has to give as good as you get and I judged your comment as attacking me and not what I said on the subject matter, then you try to say its is me being childish for being humorous, though I did appreciate you calling a'Snide out like that. Anyway if people are rude and offensive to me I give it back.

The top sentence in my reply was aimed at Shae who was being especially childish.

...obviously you ... do not understand such words going towards your own inadequacies instead.

I never understood why someone would want to declare war on someone else..... terrible people!

Or perhaps it is we never understand why people declare war on someone and don't do anything, silly people...

Actually more important is people who fail to do any analysis of their prey before declaring war, so they then find absoultely nothing to shoot....

....I think it would be a great idea if CCP allowed corps who have no interest in pvp to ...?

The day ccp stops people from going to war is the day we become worse than wow.

That is just not going to happen, the mechanics are fairly good but need some adjustment, I have proposed some changes which would improve the situation a bit because in my vie wthe war dec mechanism is not that bad, its how the player base has evolved.

1. Work out something to limit the time that an entity can be war decked, perma war decs on small indy corps are just meh, I don't care about perma decks on 0.0 entities however.

2. Reduced the cost or war decks and get rid of this stupid amount on large alliances

3. Make it so that if a character joins another character owned corp the war follows them for 7 days after they have left the war decked corp.

4. Go with my idea on the OS for watch list functionality on a constellation, when operational it can be blown up. The idea is to give a target for the defender to hit that has real strategic value and put a bit more skin in the game for the attackers.

1. Small indy corps can get help or they can learn how to fight back. This is eve and the beauty of eve is it is a pvp world weather you like it or not. To take that away takes the foundations out of the game. Yes there are ways to get rid of decs like dropping corp but the bottom line is no space is safe space.

2. Sure I'll go with that but I think the cost is about right. We spend billions each week on wars and there should be a cost to this. We need to make sure there is an income source to pay for this.

3. Agree. But hard to code I think as dropping into neutral corp first then joining would avoid that.

4. I like the new changes to the watch list. In my view get rid of local all together. Make it more realistic! Not sure of your idea but I'll have a read when I have more time.

No.

I can explain why, but its a waste of time.

no because he can see going round and round the merry go round with you is a waste of time.

well from anyone elses its because you are going to have whatever damn conversation you want,
regardless of what any of us type.

In all the time I have floated this idea I have had not one single good reason why it is a bad idea, ...