Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
157
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 22:57:00 -
[181] - Quote
Zarcan wrote: But I never got the 95mil.
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here?
Zarcan wrote: Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh?
I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
I'm not trying to rag on you or anything but.... How did something worth 95 million ISK to you, end up being your largest asset after four years? |

Ayuren Aakiwa
K1llUminat1
7
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 02:52:00 -
[182] - Quote
JC Anderson wrote:Zarcan wrote: But I never got the 95mil.
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here? Zarcan wrote: Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh?
I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
I'm not trying to rag on you or anything but.... How did something worth 95 million ISK to you, end up being your largest asset after four years?
This, this so hard. |

Ai Shun
135
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 02:57:00 -
[183] - Quote
Ayuren Aakiwa wrote:JC Anderson wrote:Zarcan wrote: But I never got the 95mil.
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here? Zarcan wrote: Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh?
I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
I'm not trying to rag on you or anything but.... How did something worth 95 million ISK to you, end up being your largest asset after four years? This, this so hard.
That's what she said? |

Dannes Mistry
Paladin Enterprises Inc. B.S.I.
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 04:03:00 -
[184] - Quote
After reading through a lot of this (I did get slighty bored with it towards the end) I only got one thing to really say. Why should the game mechanics get changed just cos you got scammed? if you had bothered to look up on popular scams in eve, you would have noticed that this is near the damn top. If you had used your common sense, and instead said to the guy who interested in buying, I just set up a contract, and then you can buy, you wouldnt be having this problem. it what contracts are there for. it takes barely more then a minute to set up a contract. I have given money to people who have been scammed but these have mostly been people with two-three month or younger life. the fact that you have a 4 year old toon, and did it with a 95 mill domi, suggest that even if you havent played the total of those 4 years, you damn well been playing long enough to have known better. Accept that scams are a great part of this game. Sure it frustrating. sure I have taken a hit on my main char, (to the tune of about 1.2 bill. messed up reading a contract. entirely my fault.) but the whine fest people are having on this atm, is going too far. you wanna feel safe, go and be a WOW noob. are some of the game mechanics a bit messed up? well sure. it an 8 year old game. some of the mechanics frankly dont make sense, cos parts of it got changed or phased out. Do I wish sometimes these things got fixed? yeah sure. But at the end of the day, I play this game, cos I like it, and am willing to put up with current game mechanics and accept that some of it will change soon, and some of it probably wont be fixed for another 8 years. If you cant deal with that then why the hell are you playing? if you play this game you accept it all. the fact that you can be PVPed, (even if you dont want to) anywhere, or scammed in jita, or just that some git just nicked your jetcan and killed you when you thought you could do him instead. The game mechanics do not need to be changed to the extent that a MINORITY think it does. if you want the mechanics to be more wow like, then go and join wow. if you want it to be more rift like, then go and play rift. This is EVE ONLINE. If you cant hack playing it, then sod off. HTFU |

Seleia O'Sinnor
Drop of Honey
162
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 08:52:00 -
[185] - Quote
Now I was in need of some chat channels and I stumbled across this:
When I remove a chat window, which can be closed, let's call it foobar. Now I minimize foobar, and it gets stacked within the chat button. No new button in the Neocom. When I minimize foobar while being in one window with local and corp it gets grouped as a new info button. Please, this is not usable, it just feels awkward.
The info button blends in perfectly with other minimized windows like info windows of items and scanner. How can I tell those apart? For chats it was perfect to have the title of the window as a thin bar minimized at the bottom of the screen so I could see which chat window is active and get back to it.
We really could do with small captions, especially for chat channels, make the neocom wider. Eve community: An angry mob of bright people hunting witches, more torches, more hay forks, growing and growing. |

Cebraio
Starfire Oasis
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 11:11:00 -
[186] - Quote
Miyamato wrote: I've played a ton of MMO's in my lifetime but I have never once been around a community that actually says scamming is a legitimate mechanic of any kind. Let alone game mechanic.
Welcome to EVE! Scamming IS legitimate here and it should be. This is not Ponies Online, this game is for people who can use their brains (or at least wait some seconds to triple check their trades).
Zarcan wrote: ...., but indeed, I'm really astounded at how many people actively defend it. I understand its a part of the game, I understand CCP endorses it, I'll never understand why the players fight for it so adamantly.
From my perspective, it doesn't *have* to be this way, and we wouldn't be having this 8 page discussion if it were a black and white issue, as some people would have you believe.
Again someone who wants EVE to be dumbed down and made a safe and friendly place for everyone. I hear, some MMOs provide pure PVE servers with instant gratification. Why not play those instead?
I had some sympathy with the OP at first, but Marhaba confirmed that OP just made a stupid mistake and thus this is just another day in EVE.
On a side note, I have never been scammed in EVE during the last 8 years (maybe 4 years actual playing). I once set up a wrong contract (when they were still called "escrow") and lost a good amount of money. But I asked nicely and got my money back.
Not everyone in EVE is bad, but the ones who want to play bad should be allowed to do so!
|

flakeys
Arkham Innovations
197
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 13:57:00 -
[187] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Brock Nelson wrote:Exactly, and how do you expect lag to be fixed? It's been a problem ever since Eve first came out and it's been a problem for every multiplayer game that ever exist. In the sense that a game's efficiency is limited by connection speed, sure. I don't really believe that to be an sort of excuse for not correcting insecure trading windows, I haven't encountered this drastic of a trade window exploit problem in any other MMO. If I'm not mistaken, even SOE (who was notorious for a poor connection with their playerbase, if anyone else was along with the NGE), SWG had an alert window whenever the client modified the order, precisely to prevent this problem. I don't see why this hasn't been implemented, especially in a game that has been around as long as EVE has. They don't like getting petitions any more than we like getting scammed.
SOE also did a weeks reroll a lot of the times on SWG servers without any compensation what so ever wich made your week gaming be for jack **** too , changed the game overnight completely and didn't/doesn't give a **** about customers.Now could we please not compare SWG and EVE because it is giving me shivers allready.
Thanks |

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp
277
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 14:21:00 -
[188] - Quote
Morganta wrote: if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once
Yup.... Lost almost everything I had at a Gate Camp once. It was own darn fault, I was being stupid and knew better. Impatience kills a lot more Characters than anything else does in this game. Fast forward to this weekend, full load of Amarr Fuel Blocks in my Impel and I sat and waited 6 hours at a gate safe at a border HS/LS gate for a camp to get bored before proceeding. Lesson learned. Two things you need to be successful in this game are patience and preserverance. Patience to wait for the right moment to act. Preserverance to pick up the pieces and move on when it all comes crashing down.
I feel for you OP, but look at this as a defining moment in your EVE career. Are you going to rage quit or are you going to take a deep breath and not succumb to frustration and leave the game. My Sig says it all IMO. This pain will be useful to you in the future.
If not then EVE is not for you. 'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you. |

Lamperouge Kasenumi
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 17:09:00 -
[189] - Quote
Lol some answers are so funny,
Here's the real answer to the question: Is scamming in Eve ok? It depends!
Crazy isn't it, there's some condition, check this out!
Scamming is only ok when it's done within the expected behavior of the game. If a bug allow you to scam people, it's an exploit and should not be tolerated by CCP.
From what I understand of the OP, this is an exploit and should not be tolerated.
And big lol at the "you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE" crowd, now you are just being silly. |

Bait James
Beasts of Burden The 99 Percent
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 19:15:00 -
[190] - Quote
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=519066
What happened to that topic?? |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
21
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 19:32:00 -
[191] - Quote
Holy crap, 10 pages of people continuously ranting at me. Why is this thread still alive?
I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed. It's a pathetic cop out that CCP told me to "avoid the trade window" because if it's faulty mechanics.
If something doesn't work right in your game, fix it. Especially when it's as black and white as the trade window not having a 2nd stage confirmation window before the transaction goes through.
JC Anderson wrote:Zarcan wrote: But I never got the 95mil.
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here? Zarcan wrote: Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh?
I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
I'm not trying to rag on you or anything but.... How did something worth 95 million ISK to you, end up being your largest asset after four years?
I've only been active for maybe a year and a half out of those four years. 13.7mil sp. College and work make it tough to manage a game like this sometimes. |

Ai Shun
203
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 19:38:00 -
[192] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed.
ORLY? There are other things that need fixing more. Like checking the trade before hitting accept. |

Bait James
Beasts of Burden The 99 Percent
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 19:45:00 -
[193] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Zarcan wrote:I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed. ORLY? There are other things that need fixing more. Like checking the trade before hitting accept.
He wouldn't have been able to do anything no matter how long he checked. It is an exploit as outlined here http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=517991&page=1 It was supposed to have been fixed 5 years ago |

Velicitia
Open Designs
460
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 20:32:00 -
[194] - Quote
Nephilius wrote:Tippia wrote:GǪexcept that scamming is explicitly and purposefully allowed by the game designers. Its existence has nothing to do with apathy. I'm calling Shenanigans on that comment. The contracts system has been revamped more than a couple of times to help prevent scamming, at least from being stupidly easy. I remember the days where someone could name a Raven "Caldari Navy Raven" and scam some poor sucker who saw that. These days, you have to get pretty creative to pull off a decent scam, or just get a victim that's asleep at the wheel.
1. create contract for 750m isk for 1 unit of carbon 2. link in jita chat as "Charon" 3. ??? 4. Profit.
wals always my favourite. Thankfully I was too spacepoor to ever fall for that one. came close to getting nailed on a PLEX for 350m (and a PLEX) contract once or twice though. |

Marhaba
Dissolution Syndicate
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 22:48:00 -
[195] - Quote
Bait James wrote:Ai Shun wrote:Zarcan wrote:I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed. ORLY? There are other things that need fixing more. Like checking the trade before hitting accept. He wouldn't have been able to do anything no matter how long he checked. It is an exploit as outlined here http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=517991&page=1It was supposed to have been fixed 5 years ago
But that's NOT the scam that I used. I never hit accept while 95m was shown. I changed the amount before I hit accept. In your link, the amount is changed after. So, please don't slander me and accuse me of exploiting.
If he had waited for me to hit accept first, there would have been no problem. Then again, i would have never hit accept with 95m in the window, so he'd be waiting a long time. |

Valentyn3
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 22:56:00 -
[196] - Quote
JC Anderson wrote:Zarcan wrote: But I never got the 95mil.
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here? Zarcan wrote: Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh?
I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
I'm not trying to rag on you or anything but.... How did something worth 95 million ISK to you, end up being your largest asset after four years?
Maybe he wasn't playing that much or took a long hiatus.
"Absolutely no jabs or fast punches of any kind. Jabbers can not be on our team." |

Brock Nelson
321
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 23:36:00 -
[197] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Holy crap, 10 pages of people continuously ranting at me. Why is this thread still alive?
If you didn't want to get this kind of attention then don't create ANY thread ok?
You can simply request to have the thread locked by clicking on the little flag icon I don't always like to modify my sell order but when I do, I like to spin my mouse wheel |

Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
189
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 00:15:00 -
[198] - Quote
You got scammed.
Trade window is not safe, and while this particular scam might be different if it is in fact exploiting lag, I wouldn't hold your breath.
You could've prevented this by using the contract system.
It's not just about the "risk vs. reward", it's also about "carelessness and laziness both have a price in eve". |

Duvida
The Scope Gallente Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 00:35:00 -
[199] - Quote
Ris Dnalor wrote:You got scammed.
Trade window is not safe, and while this particular scam might be different if it is in fact exploiting lag, I wouldn't hold your breath.
You could've prevented this by using the contract system.
It's not just about the "risk vs. reward", it's also about "carelessness and laziness both have a price in eve".
That's the deal, it's a broken game mechanic. You really can't use a feature of the game because of it. It'd be like someone discovering a way to swipe inventory from others' hangers. It's a broken part of the game being exploited. |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
384
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 01:07:00 -
[200] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Zarcan wrote:Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code. if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once
speak for yourself. never scammed. |

Bait James
Beasts of Burden The 99 Percent
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 03:00:00 -
[201] - Quote
Marhaba wrote:Bait James wrote:Ai Shun wrote:Zarcan wrote:I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed. ORLY? There are other things that need fixing more. Like checking the trade before hitting accept. He wouldn't have been able to do anything no matter how long he checked. It is an exploit as outlined here http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=517991&page=1It was supposed to have been fixed 5 years ago But that's NOT the scam that I used. I never hit accept while 95m was shown. I changed the amount before I hit accept. In your link, the amount is changed after. So, please don't slander me and accuse me of exploiting. If he had waited for me to hit accept first, there would have been no problem. Then again, i would have never hit accept with 95m in the window, so he'd be waiting a long time.
What you did is exactly the same exploit. Hard to weasel out when you describe how you did it, and the entire trick relies on the lag of a high pop system to pull off.
It is an exploit. Has been for 5 years. Learn to scam without needing to exploit. |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
34
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 04:09:00 -
[202] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Zarcan wrote:The fault of the decent into a state of tyranny rests on the shoulders of the apathetic. GǪexcept that scamming is explicitly and purposefully allowed by the game designers. Its existence has nothing to do with apathy.
I would classify being scammed by a lagging trade window as an exploit. The particular one has been around for years and resulting in the loss of at least one T2 BPO (before invention).
|

Toto Zinny
GWA Corp
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 05:35:00 -
[203] - Quote
If the player found a exploit that allowed them to steal money from CCP, then I am sure that CCP would sit up and take notice. If this exploit exists then it should be fixed in some way, asap. |

Marhaba
Dissolution Syndicate
20
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 02:02:00 -
[204] - Quote
Bait James wrote:Marhaba wrote:Bait James wrote:Ai Shun wrote:Zarcan wrote:I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed. ORLY? There are other things that need fixing more. Like checking the trade before hitting accept. He wouldn't have been able to do anything no matter how long he checked. It is an exploit as outlined here http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=517991&page=1It was supposed to have been fixed 5 years ago But that's NOT the scam that I used. I never hit accept while 95m was shown. I changed the amount before I hit accept. In your link, the amount is changed after. So, please don't slander me and accuse me of exploiting. If he had waited for me to hit accept first, there would have been no problem. Then again, i would have never hit accept with 95m in the window, so he'd be waiting a long time. What you did is exactly the same exploit. Hard to weasel out when you describe how you did it, and the entire trick relies on the lag of a high pop system to pull off. It is an exploit. Has been for 5 years. Learn to scam without needing to exploit.
It's not, though. In the exploit version, your screen can show the correct amount of isk and a green check mark. In my version, there is NEVER a green check mark with the correct amount of isk. This is a critical difference. My scam can be avoided by simply waiting for my green check mark to appear, looking at the amount of isk it shows, and then hitting accept.
My marks are either hitting accept as soon as they drop their item in the window (meaning they didn't have time to re-check the isk), or they didn't pay close attention to the number of zeroes after seeing I had hit accept.
I've had something like two dozen people tell me that they are petitioning me for exploiting, and not once has a GM so much as said a peep to me. This is not an exploit. If you want to continue claiming it is an exploit, you'll need to provide some proof, since you're the one making the claim. |

Argaral
Obstergo NEM3SIS.
20
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 02:13:00 -
[205] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Morganta wrote:Zarcan wrote:Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code. if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh? I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
What are you, ********?
You got scammed, legitimately by a very widely known scam. If in 4 years, you haven't been affected congratulations on pure luck. If that dominix was 1/3 of your savings, buy another one and rat with it. Hell you can afk rat with the thing to get its cost back in a night. If it was your first BC and had nothing but a noobship, we may feel a bit more sorry
For now, you've copped a set back. You'll recover easily. Welcome to EVE
|

Rubix Khamsi
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 03:47:00 -
[206] - Quote
trade window should be fixed...Even if the other user edited his ISK back to zero and clicked the check mark again...Its hardly noticeable and IMO is not working as intended...
Fix it! |

nate555
GODHC INTERSTELLAR FLEET
42
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 04:27:00 -
[207] - Quote
Scamming is only legal up to a certain point. You have valid defense. I hope you get your isk back |

Ehn Roh
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 06:14:00 -
[208] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:I'm just really surprised that you all feel that way.
.
No you're not, or else you wouldn't have spent all your time bumbling around hi-sec.
People are piling on your for ranting that you expect that ripping people off would somehow be ban-able because it's a ridiculous statement from a "vet".
Exploiting is obviously not cool and lag sucks. Not a fan of intentionally obtuse interfaces either.
But scamming is a valid use of one's gameplay time, as is murdering, extorting, stealing, terrorizing, anchoring giant -secure-can dong statues, and just plain blowing crap up.
Not everyone wants to do it, but when people do something constructive it is all the more impressive that they managed to get it done despite all that other nonsense going on.
|

Riley Moore
Sentinum Research
320
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 07:00:00 -
[209] - Quote
Check your wallet transactions. (from AGLAIA Thaleia, which is my trade alt).
Everyone eventually gets burned on something. UI is ****. Live and learn.
Live long and prosper Large volumes of highly researched Ammo, drones, charges and ship bpo's. Biggest BPO store in EVE! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=445524#post445524 |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
23
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 07:02:00 -
[210] - Quote
Ehn Roh wrote:Zarcan wrote:I'm just really surprised that you all feel that way.
. No you're not, or else you wouldn't have spent all your time bumbling around hi-sec. People are piling on your for ranting that you expect that ripping people off would somehow be ban-able because it's a ridiculous statement from a "vet". Exploiting is obviously not cool and lag sucks. Not a fan of intentionally obtuse interfaces either. But scamming is a valid use of one's gameplay time, as is murdering, extorting, stealing, terrorizing, anchoring giant -secure-can dong statues, and just plain blowing crap up. Not everyone wants to do it, but when people do something constructive it is all the more impressive that they managed to get it done despite all that other nonsense going on.
I think we've seen pretty decent evidence that this is an exploit that needs to be fixed.
Riley Moore wrote:Check your wallet transactions. (from AGLAIA Thaleia, which is my trade alt). Everyone eventually gets burned on something. UI is ****. Live and learn. Live long and prosper
Wow. Thank you sir. o7 |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |