Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hey guys.
So, I've been running a rigged mission domi for some time now. After a good amount of missions and trading, I've got just enough so, if I sell my rigged domi at a little below real value with rigs, I'd be able to outfit a Navy Domi.
So, I go to Jita and offer a sale of my domi for 95mil, send out the message a few times. The rigs were 1x Sentry Drone Damage Aug, 1x Large Nanobot, 1x Large Aux Nano Pump
I get a trade offer, the window pops up. I throw my Domi in to see if that's what he's inquiring about, and I see 95mil in green show up, along with his accept checkmark. I accept as well, and it goes through.
But I never got the 95mil.
Character is Marhaba. He proceeds to say in Jita chat "Thanks for the free domi ;)."
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here? |

Zleon Leigh
53
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Petition
Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital.
CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
170
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Never use the trade window. It's almost always a scam.
Contracts every time. FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Blueprint calculator and other 'useful' utilities. |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
817
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
never use the trade window you got lag scammed
petition it The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Seatox
Department of Defence Important Internet Spaceship League
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
961
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
never
ever
ever
use the trade window when you could use a contract. This is an old scheme, and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. |

Maxpie
Metaphysical Utopian Society Explorations
42
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
Definitely petition. Definitely do not use the trade window. A good red flag is when someone asks to use it. Always do a contract instead. If they balk or give excuses why they cannot use a contract, you can now be sure they are scamming. |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead.
Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Not only was it there, but if it were modified within a short time frame within hitting accept, there would have been a notification (if I'm not mistaken, I've seen it before: ""Warning: your client has modified your order. Do you still want to accept?" Or something.).
Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it.
Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code. |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
189
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
I agree, lesson learned, nothing you can really do, however, it stuff like this that is bush league - not the scam itself, but the damn interface and it causes players to leave.
CCP, fix your damn anitquated 1985 interface.
You didnt get scammed by a player, you got scammed by CCP.
Lag scammed? Only in EVE can something so stupid take place.
Fix that ****. |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
817
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:29:00 -
[10] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code.
if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:31:00 -
[11] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Zarcan wrote:Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code. if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once
Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh?
I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one. |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
962
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:33:00 -
[12] - Quote
Good luck with that 
And I'm so glad you found the money to form your own corp a few minutes ago. Not so broke, huh? |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:34:00 -
[13] - Quote
Feligast wrote:Good luck with that  And I'm so glad you found the money to form your own corp a few minutes ago. Not so broke, huh?
... it costs a measly 1.5mil to make a corp, and I made it hours ago. The scam happened about 20 minutes ago.
Can you do basic math? Or do I have to spell out why your post is irrelevant on both accounts? |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
189
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:35:00 -
[14] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Zarcan wrote:Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code. if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once
Yea but the point still stands, CCP needs to fix dumb **** like this. You may not have the resources of Blizzard but damn, you cant make a properly working trade window? Really? C'mon CCP... |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:39:00 -
[15] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:Morganta wrote:Zarcan wrote:Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code. if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once Yea but the point still stands, CCP needs to fix dumb **** like this. You may not have the resources of Blizzard but damn, you cant make a properly working trade window? Really? C'mon CCP...
A petition has been filed.
I'll keep the thread updated on how CCP deals with it, so we can hold them accountable. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. Comic Mischief
257
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:42:00 -
[16] - Quote
Hm, I wondered how that worked. I had someone offer me a ship for well below cost, a trade window popped up along with the ship. I could not figure out how such a scam would work, but this being eve I closed the trade window.
Lag scam? So they zeroed the amount and hit accept at just the right time so the OP never saw it happen due to lag? CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. Subscribers can never answer a question posed to CCP. Only CCP can. |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:50:00 -
[17] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Hm, I wondered how that worked. I had someone offer me a ship for well below cost, a trade window popped up along with the ship. I could not figure out how such a scam would work, but this being eve I closed the trade window.
Lag scam? So they zeroed the amount and hit accept at just the right time so the OP never saw it happen due to lag?
Is there not supposed to be a notification window if the client modifies his order within like 3 seconds of pressing the accept button?
I could have sworn I've seen it before. |

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
308
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:53:00 -
[18] - Quote
Are you sure you saw 95.000.000.00 and not 95.000.00?
Remember to ALWAYS count the digits and subtract by two (as those last two are "cents").
Yeah... dumb interface deatails thingy. But somehow... I have this nagging suspicion that CCP made it this way on purpose for this exact reason. "Just because I seem like an idiot, doesn't mean I am one." ~Unknown |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 22:55:00 -
[19] - Quote
ShahFluffers wrote:Are you sure you saw 95.000.000.00 and not 95.000.00?
Remember to ALWAYS count the digits and subtract by two (as those last two are "cents").
Yeah... dumb interface deatails thingy. But somehow... I have this nagging suspicion that CCP made it this way on purpose for this exact reason.
Yes, considering there was no exchange of money whatsoever according to my transactions journal.
Also, hooray for my first forum like recieved. \o/ |

Zleon Leigh
53
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
Another example of how scammers get off without consequences... he'll never leave the station, never have sec status where you could even put a bounty on him (even though that is a totally f'd up mechanic as well) Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital.
CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day |

Rath Kelbore
The Six-Pack Syndicate EVE Animal Control
12
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:05:00 -
[21] - Quote
I understand that you're upset about losing your ship, but I suggest you just move on. You got scammed, it happens if you're not careful.
You can petition it but can you prove that the trade window said 95 million when you hit the accept button???? Probably not. It will just waste a gm's time to look at it.
It's just the way it is *shrug*. Eve isn't perfect but what else are you gonna play? World of Warcraft? |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:07:00 -
[22] - Quote
Rath Kelbore wrote:I understand that you're upset about losing your ship, but I suggest you just move on. You got scammed, it happens if you're not careful.
You can petition it but can you prove that the trade window said 95 million when you hit the accept button???? Probably not. It will just waste a gm's time to look at it.
It's just the way it is *shrug*. Eve isn't perfect but what else are you gonna play? World of Warcraft?
The fault of the decent into a state of tyranny rests on the shoulders of the apathetic. |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:12:00 -
[23] - Quote
Marhaba > 0/ Zarcan > So I'm gonna go ahead and humbly request that you give me what's mine. Marhaba > what, like a wardec? Gladly Zarcan > How about that Dominix? You know, that one that represents 1/2 of my capital in EVE Marhaba > i've already sold it. [Contract for 65mil] Zarcan > Well then surely you've got the money to reinburse me.
... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4366
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:15:00 -
[24] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:The fault of the decent into a state of tyranny rests on the shoulders of the apathetic. GǪexcept that scamming is explicitly and purposefully allowed by the game designers. Its existence has nothing to do with apathy. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:18:00 -
[25] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Zarcan wrote:The fault of the decent into a state of tyranny rests on the shoulders of the apathetic. GǪexcept that scamming is explicitly and purposefully allowed by the game designers. Its existence has nothing to do with apathy.
... and why the hell would we as a playerbase tolerate that? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4367
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:20:00 -
[26] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:... and why the hell would we as a playerbase tolerate that? Because it's no different than someone violencing your boat: it's the game we play.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Elessa Enaka
State War Academy Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:20:00 -
[27] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Tippia wrote:Zarcan wrote:The fault of the decent into a state of tyranny rests on the shoulders of the apathetic. GǪexcept that scamming is explicitly and purposefully allowed by the game designers. Its existence has nothing to do with apathy. ... and why the hell would we as a playerbase tolerate that?
Because the playerbase in eve are in large majority sociopaths who get off on perpetrating this sort of thing or hearing others cry when it happens to them.
Sad but true... Devour to survive, so it is, so it's always been |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
819
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:25:00 -
[28] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Rath Kelbore wrote:I understand that you're upset about losing your ship, but I suggest you just move on. You got scammed, it happens if you're not careful.
You can petition it but can you prove that the trade window said 95 million when you hit the accept button???? Probably not. It will just waste a gm's time to look at it.
It's just the way it is *shrug*. Eve isn't perfect but what else are you gonna play? World of Warcraft? The fault of the decent into a state of tyranny rests on the shoulders of the apathetic.
then I suggest you buy a ticket to fanfest and punch Hilmar
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Mekki Muvila
Petrichor Acquisitions and Industry Development Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:30:00 -
[29] - Quote
Your Domi fit sucks anyway |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:33:00 -
[30] - Quote
Mekki Muvila wrote:Your Domi fit sucks anyway
The Guristas disagree. |

DarkAegix
Acetech Systems
777
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
There should probably be a final, confirmation window which appears for both parties after accept is clicked. It shows the proposed transaction, which cannot be modified. Both parties need to click accept again, or else reject. |

Rakshasa Taisab
Sane Industries Inc.
711
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:46:00 -
[32] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:There should probably be a final, confirmation window which appears for both parties after accept is clicked. It shows the proposed transaction, which cannot be modified. Both parties need to click accept again, or else reject. Also known as a 'contract'. 84,000 AUR ($420) spent on NeX store for Troll and Profit. |

Selinate
580
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:50:00 -
[33] - Quote
Morganta wrote:
if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once
Confirming towards the beginning of this character's birth, I got scammed for 400 mil through a courier contract.
Haven't been scammed since if memory serves right... |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 23:56:00 -
[34] - Quote
I think that CCP just wants the extra $15 a month.
Oh, wait, scammers make so much ISK that they just plex.
Hmmmmm. Obviously a completely equitable situation here. |

Mekki Muvila
Petrichor Acquisitions and Industry Development Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:00:00 -
[35] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Mekki Muvila wrote:Your Domi fit sucks anyway The Guristas disagree.
The Guristas are ********.
You combine buffer and active tanks, you use a mag stab on a ship where your DPS comes from drones.... it doesn't take much to make a Domi invincible in L4s, but it takes some intelligence to fit it properly. No wonder you're so broke for such an old player, it takes you ages to do the simplest of L4s, and its mind numbingly boring to do it. |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:05:00 -
[36] - Quote
Mekki Muvila wrote:Zarcan wrote:Mekki Muvila wrote:Your Domi fit sucks anyway The Guristas disagree. The Guristas are ********. You combine buffer and active tanks, you use a mag stab on a ship where your DPS comes from drones.... it doesn't take much to make a Domi invincible in L4s, but it takes some intelligence to fit it properly. No wonder you're so broke for such an old player, it takes you ages to do the simplest of L4s, and its mind numbingly boring to do it.
Oh save your crap. My dominix was a great combination of HP, repair quantity and resistances along with combined rail and drone damage.
If you think I give two craps about your opinion of my ship, consider; I had enough intelligence to not allow you to scam me out of 300mil, so, kindly go hide in your corner of your basement you sociopath. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4369
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:07:00 -
[37] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:I think that CCP just wants the extra $15 a month.
Oh, wait, scammers make so much ISK that they just plex. So CCP earns $17.50 a month from them.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Hijeri
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
65
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:09:00 -
[38] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Mekki Muvila wrote:Your Domi fit sucks anyway The Guristas disagree.
You think being able to kill rats enables you to judge whether a fit is good or not? That's freaking hilarious coming from someone like you, who's played this game for years. I can hop into an armor drake and do L4's. Just saying. I see ratters rat with the most stupid fits every day.
You'll do good staying in high sec for the rest of your life. Have fun with your mission running, basically the most boring thing you can do in this game along with mining. This is an MMO sandbox, and then you go and voluntarily grind your ass off doing the most mundane thing, as if you're playing World of Warcraft. Hilarious. |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
189
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:10:00 -
[39] - Quote
Zleon Leigh wrote:Another example of how scammers get off without consequences... he'll never leave the station, never have sec status where you could even put a bounty on him (even though that is a totally f'd up mechanic as well)
You know, you bring up a very good point
People always talk about EVE in terms of
"Risk vs Reward"
Where is the risk for scammer?
Can someone give a legimate reason as to why there is a risk for a scammer selling Carbon to someone who thinks its a Charon? Cause if there is no LEGITIMATE risk, this game activity needs to be put in line with all the other activities of EVE that require risk. |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:11:00 -
[40] - Quote
Hijeri wrote:Zarcan wrote:Mekki Muvila wrote:Your Domi fit sucks anyway The Guristas disagree. You think being able to kill rats enables you to judge whether a fit is good or not? That's freaking hilarious coming from someone like you, who's played this game for years. I can hop into an armor drake and do L4's. Just saying. I see ratters rat with the most stupid fits every day. You'll do good staying in high sec, running missions all day.
Teach me your ways, wise computer game master!
Montevius Williams wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:Another example of how scammers get off without consequences... he'll never leave the station, never have sec status where you could even put a bounty on him (even though that is a totally f'd up mechanic as well) You know, you bring up a very good point People always talk about EVE in terms of "Risk vs Reward" Where is the risk for scammer? Can someone give a legimate reason as to why there is a risk for a scammer selling Carbon to someone who thinks its a Charon? Cause if there is no LEGITIMATE risk, this game activity needs to be put in line with all the other activities of EVE that require risk.
The risk, indeed, should be CCP catching them and banning them. |

Cryten Jones
Advantage Inc The Matari Consortium
31
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:12:00 -
[41] - Quote
Sigh... There was some sympathy at the start of the thread. shame you went a ruined it really.... grow up mate, it's a game.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4369
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:14:00 -
[42] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:The risk, indeed, should be CCP catching them and banning them. For what?
Do you also propose that CCP should start catching you and banning you for shooting those Guristas?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:14:00 -
[43] - Quote
Cryten Jones wrote:Sigh... There was some sympathy at the start of the thread. shame you went a ruined it really.... grow up mate, it's a game.
God forbid I'm a high-sec player.
Tippia wrote:Zarcan wrote:The risk, indeed, should be CCP catching them and banning them. For what? Do you also propose that CCP should start catching you and banning you for shooting those Guristas?
For what? Really? Do I have to spell out that scamming players out of ISK, which is transferable to game time, is the same thing as scamming people out of real money? A dishonest method of gameplay that CCP only endorses because it brings them more money? |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
822
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:15:00 -
[44] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Cryten Jones wrote:Sigh... There was some sympathy at the start of the thread. shame you went a ruined it really.... grow up mate, it's a game.
I'm a high-sec player.
and that is why you fail
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4369
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:18:00 -
[45] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:For what? Really? Do I have to spell out that scamming players out of ISK, which is transferable to game time, is the same thing as scamming people out of real money? Except that it's not. Well, unless you're an ISK sellerGǪ in which case they most certainly should ban you, not the scammer.
Scamming is legitimate gameplay. Why would they ban people for playing the game? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:20:00 -
[46] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Zarcan wrote:For what? Really? Do I have to spell out that scamming players out of ISK, which is transferable to game time, is the same thing as scamming people out of real money? Except that it's not. Well, unless you're an ISK sellerGǪ in which case they most certainly should ban you, not the scammer. Scamming is legitimate gameplay. Why would they ban people for playing the game?
CCP decides what is legitimate and what isn't. If you really want to put your energy into defending scammers, all the more power to you. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4369
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:22:00 -
[47] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:CCP decides what is legitimate and what isn't. GǪand they've decided that scamming is legitimate. So you can stop with the GÇ£ban themGÇ¥ nonsense. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
189
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:24:00 -
[48] - Quote
[/quote]The risk, indeed, should be CCP catching them and banning them.[/quote]
No, scamming is legitimate gameplay mechanic. I'm more concerned about the trade window interface being buggy, and being scammed due to lag...thats just dumb. Scamming in and of itself is fine. Scams that you cant avoid becasue of bad interface design/buggy interface is wrong. Thats not a players fauly. That's CCP's fault. |

non judgement
Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance
741
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:27:00 -
[49] - Quote
Mekki Muvila wrote:Zarcan wrote:Mekki Muvila wrote:Your Domi fit sucks anyway The Guristas disagree. The Guristas are ********. You combine buffer and active tanks, you use a mag stab on a ship where your DPS comes from drones.... it doesn't take much to make a Domi invincible in L4s, but it takes some intelligence to fit it properly. No wonder you're so broke for such an old player, it takes you ages to do the simplest of L4s, and its mind numbingly boring to do it. I don't know many people who only have an armor buffer tank for missions (unless they use rr). There is nothing wrong with putting on some buffer on an active tank when doing missions. Also not all the dps comes from drones with a Domi. A Domi has 6 turrets, not just 6 highslots, why wouldn't you use them? People who use a neut domi in pvp might think that drones are the only dps.
Edit: on the main topic: Not much in the game that is as dodgy as the trade window. Never stop a contract to do a trade window with a stranger. |

Wacktopia
Noir.
142
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:29:00 -
[50] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Zarcan wrote:CCP decides what is legitimate and what isn't. GǪand they've decided that scamming is legitimate. So you can stop with the Gǣban themGǥ nonsense.
This. Scams are just another part of EVE. I know all the good scams of course and can tell anyone who wants to throw a few million my way.  . |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:31:00 -
[51] - Quote
I'm just really surprised that you all feel that way.
I guess this is another issue however, the trade window is the culprit.
If the right DEV happens to read this, the petition is filed, please get back to me. |

Cryten Jones
Advantage Inc The Matari Consortium
31
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:32:00 -
[52] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Cryten Jones wrote:Sigh... There was some sympathy at the start of the thread. shame you went a ruined it really.... grow up mate, it's a game.
God forbid I'm a high-sec player.
Mate.. your play style is not the issue here! I spent at least half of my time in EvE in hisec. Nothing wrong with it if that's what you enjoy as...guess what... IT'S A GAME.
Seriously, if you want safe fun EvE is not for you, please understand I am not been an ass about it... just after 7+ years I can tell you this will not be the last time you loose a crap load and definitely not the last time you will feel violated by the loss.
-CJ
|

gfldex
266
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:42:00 -
[53] - Quote
If believe you got hit by a bug file a bug report. If that bug is confirmed (that bug is very very old btw) you refere to it in your petition. Whining about a bug on the forum that was exploited will and always has spawn trolls. It never spawned devs. There is still hope for EVE:
"Best Regards, GM Ninjapirate" |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
826
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:45:00 -
[54] - Quote
its too easy to scam people in eve it's like they want to be scammed
try selling a few rifter fleet issues in contracts  The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:45:00 -
[55] - Quote
gfldex wrote:If believe you got hit by a bug file a bug report. If that bug is confirmed (that bug is very very old btw) you refere to it in your petition. Whining about a bug on the forum that was exploited will and always has spawn trolls. It never spawned devs.
Thank you for the reply. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1528
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:46:00 -
[56] - Quote
scams are a part of the game, as long as the scammer isn't taking advantage of a bug. deal with it. it's just another form of PvP.
what's next, do you want suicide gankers to be banned? you're hilarious |

Lord Wiggin
Furian Necromongers
23
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 00:56:00 -
[57] - Quote
This is Eve, Scamming is not just allowed, but even encourged in certain ways. It's unfortunate that you did get scammed, and it would be nice if CCP actually made a decent trade interface, but that is unlikely to happen anytime soon. I would have to guess that this happens to a large majority of players in this game, hopefully it doesn't ruin you, and you move on. About the only angle I could see you having on a petition is that the guy is using Jita lag as an exploit, possible, but i'm guessing a long shot without screenshots to back it up.
|

Zleon Leigh
53
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 01:56:00 -
[58] - Quote
Andski wrote:scams are a part of the game, as long as the scammer isn't taking advantage of a bug. deal with it. it's just another form of PvP.
what's next, do you want suicide gankers to be banned? you're hilarious
Suicide gankers encounter risk/reward. No balance at all in scamming - it's win for them and loose on so many fronts it's almost impossible to count for us. Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital.
CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day |

Utremi Fasolasi
La Dolce Vita
42
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 02:14:00 -
[59] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:I'm just really surprised that you all feel that way.
I guess this is another issue however, the trade window is the culprit.
If the right DEV happens to read this, the petition is filed, please get back to me.
A worthy workman never blames his tools.
Use a contract next time, and move on. Chalk it to a learning experience of something you should have learned within a month of playing, let alone 4 yrs..  |

Kehro Urgus
Ab Obice Saevior
109
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 02:20:00 -
[60] - Quote
For the size of the loss I don't see why all this melodrama... |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1528
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 02:31:00 -
[61] - Quote
Zleon Leigh wrote:Andski wrote:scams are a part of the game, as long as the scammer isn't taking advantage of a bug. deal with it. it's just another form of PvP.
what's next, do you want suicide gankers to be banned? you're hilarious Suicide gankers encounter risk/reward. No balance at all in scamming - it's win for them and loose on so many fronts it's almost impossible to count for us.
the risk/reward doctrine doesn't apply to everything in eve, and there's risk in scamming (getting outed, wasting your time, etc.)
the OP is an idiot for getting scammed and crying about it on the forums |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
504
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 02:35:00 -
[62] - Quote
I was scammed once... a long time ago... at first it hurt. Then I started stealing loot and haven't had a care since.
Moral of the story, steal more, cry less. |

Disdaine
187
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 02:41:00 -
[63] - Quote
+1 eve community.
Derp your fit sucks.
Derp hi-sec player.
Derp you got scammed by someone abusing a broken trade mechanic. I will not acknowledge that this game lacks a secure player to player trade mechanic like every other mmo, but instead I will call you stupid for trying to use it.
|

Zleon Leigh
53
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 02:56:00 -
[64] - Quote
Andski wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:Andski wrote:scams are a part of the game, as long as the scammer isn't taking advantage of a bug. deal with it. it's just another form of PvP.
what's next, do you want suicide gankers to be banned? you're hilarious Suicide gankers encounter risk/reward. No balance at all in scamming - it's win for them and loose on so many fronts it's almost impossible to count for us. the risk/reward doctrine doesn't apply to everything in eve, and there's risk in scamming (getting outed, wasting your time, etc.)
Really? Risk/reward is all I hear is driving every part of EVE. CCP blather's it constantly. Sandbox proponents say it is required to hold the box together.
Getting outed? So what? They are not going anywhere anyways - the trade hubs are their safe holes while isk/material is transferred anonymously to alts. Many Pilots are claiming that scamming is the most lucrative career there is - because there is zero downside and all it takes are simple bots to execute adverts and scams.
Scamming is the disease that holds EVE back. If it's going to be a trade and continue to be supported by fail, but fully endorsed CCP mechanics - then it needs a balance before the disease finishes eroding the new player base away.
Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital.
CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
189
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 02:57:00 -
[65] - Quote
Disdaine wrote:+1 eve community.
Derp your fit sucks.
Derp hi-sec player.
Derp you got scammed by someone abusing a broken trade mechanic. I will not acknowledge that this game lacks a secure player to player trade mechanic like every other mmo, but instead I will call you stupid for trying to use it.
First, He's only stupid if he KNEW it was broken but still tried to use it. Second, why wont you acknowledge it's broken? You like EVE being broken? Attitudes like this is why **** in EVE DOESN'T get fixed. |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
190
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:05:00 -
[66] - Quote
Andski wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:Andski wrote:scams are a part of the game, as long as the scammer isn't taking advantage of a bug. deal with it. it's just another form of PvP.
what's next, do you want suicide gankers to be banned? you're hilarious Suicide gankers encounter risk/reward. No balance at all in scamming - it's win for them and loose on so many fronts it's almost impossible to count for us. the risk/reward doctrine doesn't apply to everything in eve, and there's risk in scamming (getting outed, wasting your time, etc.) the OP is an idiot for getting scammed and crying about it on the forums
lol Wasting your time? I dont consider that a risk. If you consider that a risk, apply that to EVERYTHING you do in EVE.
I need to travel 10 jumps to my level 4 mission, that takes time (risk) I need to mine these minerals, that takes time (risk) I need to set up my PI colony, that takes time (risk)
Wasting time is not a risk.
It's a part of doing business yes, but its not a risk. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1528
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:13:00 -
[67] - Quote
Zleon Leigh wrote:Really? Risk/reward is all I hear is driving every part of EVE. CCP blather's it constantly. Sandbox proponents say it is required to hold the box together.
Getting outed? So what? They are not going anywhere anyways - the trade hubs are their safe holes while isk/material is transferred anonymously to alts. Many Pilots are claiming that scamming is the most lucrative career there is - because there is zero downside and all it takes are simple bots to execute adverts and scams.
Scamming is the disease that holds EVE back. If it's going to be a trade and continue to be supported by fail, but fully endorsed CCP mechanics - then it needs a balance before the disease finishes eroding the new player base away.
Actually, using macros to spam adverts or create contracts/trades IS bannable. Making scamming bannable would destroy any notion of Eve being a "sandbox." You're an idiot. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4371
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:13:00 -
[68] - Quote
Disdaine wrote:I will not acknowledge that this game lacks a secure player to player trade mechanic like every other mmo, but instead I will call you stupid for trying to use it. Why would anyone acknowledge that when the game has numerous secure trading mechanics?
Zleon Leigh wrote:Scamming is the disease that holds EVE back. If it's going to be a trade and continue to be supported by fail, but fully endorsed CCP mechanics - then it needs a balance before the disease finishes eroding the new player base away. Lolno. It's one of the things that has made EVE famous and brought people in. Oh, and it's plenty balanced GÇö scams are hilariously easy to avoid. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1528
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:14:00 -
[69] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:Andski wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:Andski wrote:scams are a part of the game, as long as the scammer isn't taking advantage of a bug. deal with it. it's just another form of PvP.
what's next, do you want suicide gankers to be banned? you're hilarious Suicide gankers encounter risk/reward. No balance at all in scamming - it's win for them and loose on so many fronts it's almost impossible to count for us. the risk/reward doctrine doesn't apply to everything in eve, and there's risk in scamming (getting outed, wasting your time, etc.) the OP is an idiot for getting scammed and crying about it on the forums lol Wasting your time? I dont consider that a risk. If you consider that a risk, apply that to EVERYTHING you do in EVE. I need to travel 10 jumps to my level 4 mission, that takes time (risk) I need to mine these minerals, that takes time (risk) I need to set up my PI colony, that takes time (risk) Wasting time is not a risk. It's a part of doing business yes, but its not a risk.
I don't really care what you consider a "risk" or not.
If I join a corp, spend 6 months working my way up the ranks and ultimately find that they have nothing worth stealing, despite evidence to the contrary, there goes 6 months of my time. Six months that I could have spent scamming, doing PvE or making ISK through other means. Yes, wasting time is a risk and you're an idiot. |

Jorn Isu
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
17
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:24:00 -
[70] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:Andski wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:Andski wrote:scams are a part of the game, as long as the scammer isn't taking advantage of a bug. deal with it. it's just another form of PvP.
what's next, do you want suicide gankers to be banned? you're hilarious Suicide gankers encounter risk/reward. No balance at all in scamming - it's win for them and loose on so many fronts it's almost impossible to count for us. the risk/reward doctrine doesn't apply to everything in eve, and there's risk in scamming (getting outed, wasting your time, etc.) the OP is an idiot for getting scammed and crying about it on the forums lol Wasting your time? I dont consider that a risk. If you consider that a risk, apply that to EVERYTHING you do in EVE. I need to travel 10 jumps to my level 4 mission, that takes time (risk) I need to mine these minerals, that takes time (risk) I need to set up my PI colony, that takes time (risk) Wasting time is not a risk. It's a part of doing business yes, but its not a risk. But all 3 of those examples aren't wasted time. Imagine if Level 4 missions paid in lottery tickets instead of straight ISK/LP/loot. Then you'd run the risk of "wasting your time". |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
191
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:24:00 -
[71] - Quote
Andski wrote:Montevius Williams wrote:Andski wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:Andski wrote:scams are a part of the game, as long as the scammer isn't taking advantage of a bug. deal with it. it's just another form of PvP.
what's next, do you want suicide gankers to be banned? you're hilarious Suicide gankers encounter risk/reward. No balance at all in scamming - it's win for them and loose on so many fronts it's almost impossible to count for us. the risk/reward doctrine doesn't apply to everything in eve, and there's risk in scamming (getting outed, wasting your time, etc.) the OP is an idiot for getting scammed and crying about it on the forums lol Wasting your time? I dont consider that a risk. If you consider that a risk, apply that to EVERYTHING you do in EVE. I need to travel 10 jumps to my level 4 mission, that takes time (risk) I need to mine these minerals, that takes time (risk) I need to set up my PI colony, that takes time (risk) Wasting time is not a risk. It's a part of doing business yes, but its not a risk. I don't really care what you consider a "risk" or not. If I join a corp, spend 6 months working my way up the ranks and ultimately find that they have nothing worth stealing, despite evidence to the contrary, there goes 6 months of my time. Six months that I could have spent scamming, doing PvE or making ISK through other means. Yes, wasting time is a risk and you're an idiot.
So a better statement would be to say that risk is situational, dumbass idiot. 
|

Selinate
581
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:31:00 -
[72] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Zarcan wrote:CCP decides what is legitimate and what isn't. GǪand they've decided that scamming is legitimate. So you can stop with the Gǣban themGǥ nonsense.
Depends on the scam. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1528
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:31:00 -
[73] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:So a better statement would be to say that risk is situational, dumbass idiot. 
Because that's the only situation where wasted time is possible, right?
With margin trading scams, you have the risk that someone with a stockpile of whatever item you're working with will dump into your buy order. With public contract scams, you risk a ton of ISK in fees. Trade window scams are a "grey area" and exploiting lag comes with the risk of a ban, if the GM is inclined to investigate and concludes that taking advantage of lag (which isn't a real game mechanic) was your intent.
Now, when you complain about scamming being risk-free, you're being selective of what you consider a "risk," but of course, ISK or time wasted isn't a risk, right? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4371
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:35:00 -
[74] - Quote
Selinate wrote:Depends on the scam. The only scams that aren't allowed are those done through the account management: character trades and GTC trades (largely because they involve out-of-game, real-life cash and assets). If it's an in-game scam, it's allowed. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Zleon Leigh
54
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:45:00 -
[75] - Quote
Andski wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:Really? Risk/reward is all I hear is driving every part of EVE. CCP blather's it constantly. Sandbox proponents say it is required to hold the box together.
Getting outed? So what? They are not going anywhere anyways - the trade hubs are their safe holes while isk/material is transferred anonymously to alts. Many Pilots are claiming that scamming is the most lucrative career there is - because there is zero downside and all it takes are simple bots to execute adverts and scams.
Scamming is the disease that holds EVE back. If it's going to be a trade and continue to be supported by fail, but fully endorsed CCP mechanics - then it needs a balance before the disease finishes eroding the new player base away. Actually, using macros to spam adverts or create contracts/trades IS bannable. Making scamming bannable would destroy any notion of Eve being a "sandbox." You're an idiot.
And you can't read. I never said they should be bannable. I said there should be consequences, such as sec hit and station ejection. Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital.
CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1528
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:48:00 -
[76] - Quote
Zleon Leigh wrote:And you can't read. I never said they should be bannable. I said there should be consequences, such as sec hit and station ejection.l
nah that's dumb |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
192
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 03:48:00 -
[77] - Quote
Andski wrote:Montevius Williams wrote:So a better statement would be to say that risk is situational, dumbass idiot.  Because that's the only situation where wasted time is possible, right? With margin trading scams, you have the risk that someone with a stockpile of whatever item you're working with will dump into your buy order. With public contract scams, you risk a ton of ISK in fees. Trade window scams are a "grey area" and exploiting lag comes with the risk of a ban, if the GM is inclined to investigate and concludes that taking advantage of lag (which isn't a real game mechanic) was your intent. Now, when you complain about scamming being risk-free, you're being selective of what you consider a "risk," but of course, ISK or time wasted isn't a risk, right?
I never said that scamming should be risk free - please link to where I said that.
And no, time wasting is not a risk...YOU are the one making a blanket statement on this. Not me. Hell, if you want to say its relative to the person doing it, fine. But in and of itself, time wasting is not a risk.
Margin Trading - Risking Isk Public Contracts -Risking Isk
These are fine becasue you are risking isk, but we are not talking about that, we're talking about wasting time and if time is a risk or not. |

Elessa Enaka
State War Academy Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 04:29:00 -
[78] - Quote
Kehro Urgus wrote:For the size of the loss I don't see why all this melodrama...
Because, that was 1/3 (or 1/2, depending on which figure he has used in this thread, assuming you believe either one) of his total wealth in-game
TBH, if you ask me, he shouldn't have been going after a Navy Domi if he was going to be spending all of his in-game wealth on it
Isn't Rule #1: Don't fly what you can't afford to lose? Devour to survive, so it is, so it's always been |

Maxpie
Metaphysical Utopian Society Explorations
42
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 04:37:00 -
[79] - Quote
Andski wrote:Montevius Williams wrote:Andski wrote:Zleon Leigh wrote:Andski wrote:scams are a part of the game, as long as the scammer isn't taking advantage of a bug. deal with it. it's just another form of PvP.
what's next, do you want suicide gankers to be banned? you're hilarious Suicide gankers encounter risk/reward. No balance at all in scamming - it's win for them and loose on so many fronts it's almost impossible to count for us. the risk/reward doctrine doesn't apply to everything in eve, and there's risk in scamming (getting outed, wasting your time, etc.) the OP is an idiot for getting scammed and crying about it on the forums lol Wasting your time? I dont consider that a risk. If you consider that a risk, apply that to EVERYTHING you do in EVE. I need to travel 10 jumps to my level 4 mission, that takes time (risk) I need to mine these minerals, that takes time (risk) I need to set up my PI colony, that takes time (risk) Wasting time is not a risk. It's a part of doing business yes, but its not a risk. I don't really care what you consider a "risk" or not. If I join a corp, spend 6 months working my way up the ranks and ultimately find that they have nothing worth stealing, despite evidence to the contrary, there goes 6 months of my time. Six months that I could have spent scamming, doing PvE or making ISK through other means. Yes, wasting time is a risk and you're an idiot.
This point would be valid if there were no alts or second accounts. As is, there is no actual risk for scamming since people hide behind these alts and spend most of their time on their mains. There's no risk of loss of reputation or of being violenced. Eve would be awesome if it could somehow be only 1 character per person, unfortunately that's impossible. |

Doctor Ungabungas
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
80
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 05:10:00 -
[80] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:ShahFluffers wrote:Are you sure you saw 95.000.000.00 and not 95.000.00?
Remember to ALWAYS count the digits and subtract by two (as those last two are "cents").
Yeah... dumb interface deatails thingy. But somehow... I have this nagging suspicion that CCP made it this way on purpose for this exact reason. Yes, considering there was no exchange of money whatsoever according to my transactions journal. Also, hooray for my first forum like recieved. \o/
Trades don't show up in the 'transactions' journal. They only show up in the general journal tab. |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
507
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 05:32:00 -
[81] - Quote
Wasting time is a huge risk, especially in scamming.
If I spend 3 weeks doing nothing but attempting to scam, and fail at it, I have wasted 3 weeks of potential income that could have been made doing something else.
I haven't wasted the isk because I didn't have it. But I did waste time. |

Fearless M0F0
Incursion PWNAGE Asc
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 06:27:00 -
[82] - Quote
I actually use the Eve trade window lag scam as an example of what happens when a programmer forgets to wrap all the related code in a transaction context  |

Ursula LeGuinn
47
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 07:06:00 -
[83] - Quote
Using the trade window for anything other than incidentals GÇö say, trading a frozen corpse, some mining crystals or some ammo with a buddy GÇö is foolish.
It would certainly be nice if CCP tweaked the trade interface to be more reliable than it is, but until they do, not using it for commerce is one of the fundamental rules of survival in EVE.
Personally, I dislike scams because they prey largely on the new and inexperienced. While most veterans see this as a trial by fire and a rite of passage, it can cause people to quit who might later on have become respectable pilots. Many a carebear has gotten bored after a year or two and started actually playing the game. "The EVE forums are intended to provide a warm, friendly atmosphere for the EVE community."-áGÇö-áEVElopedia |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
9
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 07:18:00 -
[84] - Quote
Okay all, I'd like to give a shout out to a few people right now.
I just got back from work and logged on to find 2 active contracts to me, one from a character by the name of 1-Up Mushroom, and the other from Captain Dunzel.
1-Up Mushroom's contract offered me 50,000,000 isk and a free Navy Dominix. Captain Dunzel offered me a free Navy Dominix as well.
I am astounded and reinvigorated. You both put huge smiles on my faces and restored some hope in humanity for myself.
I am reallocating the 50,000,000 isk to Captain Dunzel's wallet for his generosity, and declining his contract. While the ship is incredibly helpful, it's just the means to an end to making my own isk.
I think everyone should give a shout out to the altruism we've seen here today from these two players, and for stepping up when CCP did not.
Thanks again guys. I'd hug you if I knew you.
Zarc |

Ursula LeGuinn
47
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 07:27:00 -
[85] - Quote
I was considering offering you 100m myself (provided your petition went nowhere), but apparently I'm too selfish. Actually, it's more that I'm too generous and would be broke all the time if I gave in to every sad story. No joke, I'm the kind of person who gives $5 to every panhandler and beggar I encounter IRL.
What's important is that you learned a lesson. You were lucky enough that folks chose to help you out in your time of need. You need to get together with people who'll tell you about stuff like this, such as public chat channels for various corporations or alliances (E-UNI is one that's populous and accessible). There are also plenty of lists of EVE scams you can Google.
I myself have never been scammed, but I was hacked years ago due to following a bad link, the very thing forum stickies warn about. I know the feeling. "The EVE forums are intended to provide a warm, friendly atmosphere for the EVE community."-áGÇö-áEVElopedia |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
9
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 07:34:00 -
[86] - Quote
Ursula LeGuinn wrote:I was considering offering you 100m myself (provided your petition went nowhere), but apparently I'm too selfish. Actually, it's more that I'm too generous and would be broke all the time if I gave in to every sad story. No joke, I'm the kind of person who gives $5 to every panhandler and beggar I encounter IRL.
What's important is that you learned a lesson. You were lucky enough that folks chose to help you out in your time of need. You need to get together with people who'll tell you about stuff like this, such as public chat channels for various corporations or alliances (E-UNI is one that's populous and accessible). There are also plenty of lists of EVE scams you can Google.
My God, you're arrogant. |

Ifly Uwalk
Concentrated Evil Mining For Profit Alliance
141
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 07:47:00 -
[87] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Ursula LeGuinn wrote:I was considering offering you 100m myself (provided your petition went nowhere), but apparently I'm too selfish. Actually, it's more that I'm too generous and would be broke all the time if I gave in to every sad story. No joke, I'm the kind of person who gives $5 to every panhandler and beggar I encounter IRL.
What's important is that you learned a lesson. You were lucky enough that folks chose to help you out in your time of need. You need to get together with people who'll tell you about stuff like this, such as public chat channels for various corporations or alliances (E-UNI is one that's populous and accessible). There are also plenty of lists of EVE scams you can Google.
My God, you're arrogant. And you're an idiot, so what? |

Ursula LeGuinn
47
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 07:47:00 -
[88] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:My God, you're arrogant.
Have you come to expect humility from anyone here on the EVE forums?
Let's see, you're a mission runner flying a ship he can't afford to lose, you fell for an elementary scam (regardless of the functionality of the trade window), and you started a thread on the forums to complain about it. If that's not an old classic I've seen dozens of times before, I don't know what is.
A few years ago, I swear people would've eaten you alive. I think this game is going soft.
Even the smallest amount of research or discussion with seasoned pilots would have prevented you from embarking down that path of disaster. I may be arrogant, but hopefully my hurting of your feelings will help you to remember to do your damned research from now on. "The EVE forums are intended to provide a warm, friendly atmosphere for the EVE community."-áGÇö-áEVElopedia |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
9
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 07:57:00 -
[89] - Quote
Ursula LeGuinn wrote:Zarcan wrote:My God, you're arrogant. Have you come to expect humility from anyone here on the EVE forums? Let's see, you're a mission runner flying a ship he can't afford to lose, you fell for an elementary scam (regardless of the functionality of the trade window), and you started a thread on the forums to complain about it. If that's not an old classic I've seen dozens of times before, I don't know what is. A few years ago, I swear people would've eaten you alive. I think this game is going soft. Even the smallest amount of research or discussion with seasoned pilots would have prevented you from embarking down that path of disaster. I may be arrogant, but hopefully my hurting of your feelings will help you to remember to do your damned research from now on.
I'm just absolutely astounded that you're really taking this much time and effort into deliberately being such a tool after this whole thing has already been taken care of.
You don't like that I do missions? Cry moar. I was around 4 years ago, tool. The playerbase was much more conducive to new players back then, not the opposite. Finally, pardon me for not googling "IS THE TRADE WINDOW FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWWED IN EVE ONLINE."
Go to bed, no one's listening to your pedantic rants about this video game. |

Ursula LeGuinn
47
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 08:06:00 -
[90] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:I'm just absolutely astounded that you're really taking this much time and effort into deliberately being such a tool after this whole thing has already been taken care of.
It hasn't been taken care of. You need to get a damned clue about how to survive in this game. The loss or reimbursement of assets is completely beside the point.
Ursula LeGuinn wrote:I was around 4 years ago, tool. The playerbase was much more conducive to new players back then, not the opposite.
Four years ago? Did you actually complete the tutorial?
Stay mad. Get motivated. Then climb in a ship and come shoot me full of humility. I want you to keep playing and to learn the lessons you need to learn along the way. "The EVE forums are intended to provide a warm, friendly atmosphere for the EVE community."-áGÇö-áEVElopedia |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 08:08:00 -
[91] - Quote
Ursula LeGuinn wrote:Zarcan wrote:I'm just absolutely astounded that you're really taking this much time and effort into deliberately being such a tool after this whole thing has already been taken care of. It hasn't been taken care of. You need to get a damned clue about how to survive in this game. The loss or reimbursement of assets is completely beside the point. Ursula LeGuinn wrote:I was around 4 years ago, tool. The playerbase was much more conducive to new players back then, not the opposite. Four years ago? Did you actually complete the tutorial? Stay mad. Get motivated. Then climb in a ship and come shoot me full of humility. I want you to keep playing and to learn the lessons you need to learn along the way.
You ever consider getting that perspective for real life? |

Brock Nelson
252
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 08:14:00 -
[92] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Considering that that ship was my largest asset
Zarcan wrote:That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game
Zarcan wrote:Zarcan > How about that Dominix? You know, that one that represents 1/2 of my capital in EVE
Zarcan wrote:I had enough intelligence to not allow you to scam me out of 300mil
So..what is it? Either that ship is 1/3 of your wealth or 1/2 or is worth 300m? I never heard of a rigged Domi being valued at 300m unless it was faction fitted.
Knowing 1-Up Mushroom, 50m is chump change for him, I think he's just hoping to get you to shut up and move on
|

Baneken
Hyvat Pahat ja Eric The Polaris Syndicate
69
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 08:24:00 -
[93] - Quote
Frankly only thing wrong here in this thread is how buggy the trade window mechanic is.
First of all I'm not sure you can even change window contents fast enough after other side has clicked accept with using exploits or what ever but doesn't other side has to accept the new changes made on other side as well after clicking accept ?
Or what ever, lesson is: never use the trade window. Besides 95mils is like what 3-4x lvl 4 missions, hardly an insurmountable loss. |

Mara Tessidar
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
367
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 08:28:00 -
[94] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:I was around 4 years ago, tool.
And yet you still fail to grasp the basic nature of Eve Online and a large portion of your personal wealth existed in the form of a single, badly fit, highsec-mission-running Dominix. Please, continue to dazzle us with your incredible wit and charm, while you tell us about unhono(u)rable spaceship thugs that should be banned from a game whose most recognized symbol is a learning curve that is a cliff strewn with corpses. Please do. Seriously. http://goo.gl/uX5vk |

Fix Lag
221
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 08:37:00 -
[95] - Quote
Looks like the OP has a pretty bad case of being a whiny little *****. I recommend a good dose of the following medication. |

Jacob Stiller
The Scope Gallente Federation
1070
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 08:46:00 -
[96] - Quote
Well, that's mighty generous of 1-Up Mushroom. If he actually posts in this thread, I'll give him a gratuitous like. |

Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 08:47:00 -
[97] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Tippia wrote:Zarcan wrote:The fault of the decent into a state of tyranny rests on the shoulders of the apathetic. GǪexcept that scamming is explicitly and purposefully allowed by the game designers. Its existence has nothing to do with apathy. ... and why the hell would we as a playerbase tolerate that?
Because its awesome. |

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2698
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 09:17:00 -
[98] - Quote
OP, you come across as a whiny so-and-so. Regardless of any particular merits your case may have, I'm just going to go ahead and say that you deserve to be scammed.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |

Jacob Stiller
The Scope Gallente Federation
1070
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 09:34:00 -
[99] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:OP, you come across as a whiny so-and-so. Regardless of any particular merits your case may have, I'm just going to go ahead and say that you deserve to be scammed.
Heh.
I'm quitting Eve and looking to give away all of my isk by buying pieces of trit for 300 mil each. Interested, OP? I'll send you a private contract if you are.
|

Julyan Fox
Fission Inc. Fusion Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 10:05:00 -
[100] - Quote
If OP got scammed because of poor coding I also find a GM should step in and revert the transactions.
Hell this game is almost 10 years old, it's about time to end the beta and work on those kind of details.
CCP do you want to entertain your playerbase or **** them? Scamming is a good thing for this game, but it should be subtle and clever, not some kind of stupid exploit any uneducated kids can pull out by messing with a clunky UI.
|

flakeys
Arkham Innovations
183
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 10:25:00 -
[101] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:I was around 4 years ago, tool..
You are one of the biggest blown up asshats i have encountered in eve after playing for 7 years on the forums.You're thread went from 'This guy should have known better but is probably a new player too bad for him' to ' Jeez what a complete asshat and a fool'.
You play for 4 years yet fail to know jita is 99% scam instead of trying to sell the ship on the frikking sell forums or contract.You fail after 4 years playing to know not to use the trade window.You play for 4 years and that was 1/3 of your wealth?Then you need to make a cry thread about it instead of just filing a petition immediatly , after 4 frikking years you should know no love on the forums for these types of threads.Then you go all rampage rage on people disagreeing with your whine , you know the people who played less yet actually use their brains.The ones who offered free itemsto you are the only ones who get some love offcourse and marked as the heroes of eve.Though it is damn nice of them to give you something it is also utterly foolish .... it's like giving a drug addict 50 dollar instead of a sandwich.
Zarcan wrote:[quote=Ursula LeGuinn]My God, you're arrogant.
Get a mirror dude .Arrogant AND ignorant on top.
There you made me make a 'damn utter noob' thread for the first time since i started playing eve and i really don't like that.
People like you get on my nerves more then scammers , and i DO dislike scammers a LOT. |

Seleia O'Sinnor
Drop of Honey
154
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 11:26:00 -
[102] - Quote
I like this thread, I like how the OP stands against all these "pew pew PVP is the only real thing in Eve and if you're around such a long time you should have become one of us or biomass yourself" people. It's so easy to be cool in Eve, just say: Hisec is bullshit, miners are all losers and should be eradicated in an instant, never complain, it's too easily interpreted as whining and start a career as badass pirate or join a nullsec corp.
CCP approves of scams, but not exploits. If the trade window can be exploited, well, this should come to attention of a GM or even better should be fixed some day. But I doubt that CCP will address the issue, all working as intended isn't it?
Please don't mind the rabbel :)
Eve community: An angry mob of bright people hunting witches, more torches, more hay forks, growing and growing. |

flakeys
Arkham Innovations
183
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 11:34:00 -
[103] - Quote
Who says the comments are from null boys only?
The lol highsec remark passed 3 times most.You don't need to be a nullsec dweller to see what a mess OP can make out of his own threads.
Speaking for myself i'm a high sec boy mostly and don't pvp often.Call me an ubercarebear as i mostly do trade , i lost a shitload more to scams then the OP's total wealth is worth according to himself but i'd be damned to make such a rant for it.Deall with it , when in doubt petition , and move on having learned something or stay an ignorant fool and do it again.
If the OP stands for something as you state then all he stands for is that age in eve does mean jack **** , please PLEASE don't make him stand for the hgih sec inhabitants , i'd feel myself forced to move to nullsec then and with me a shitload of other high sec players who would otherwise biomass out of shame ... |

1-Up Mushroom
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1865
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 13:16:00 -
[104] - Quote
Brock Nelson wrote:Knowing 1-Up Mushroom, 50m is chump change for him, I think he's just hoping to get you to shut up and move on
Yea it was chump change for me, but it's just nice to help people out every once in a while.
5 Senses In A Person... 4 Seasons In A Year... 3 Colors In A Stoplight... 2 Poles On The Earth... ONLY 1-UP MUSHROOM!!!-á If You Like My Sig, Like Me!-áRemember EVE is EVErything! |

Mekki Muvila
Petrichor Acquisitions and Industry Development Test Alliance Please Ignore
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 16:51:00 -
[105] - Quote
1-Up Mushroom wrote:Brock Nelson wrote:Knowing 1-Up Mushroom, 50m is chump change for him, I think he's just hoping to get you to shut up and move on
Yea it was chump change for me, but it's just nice to help people out every once in a while.
I got scammed out of an officer fit Kronos, and I'm really sad about it and :CCP: and broken game and ban scammers. Please make out all contracts to Mekki Muvila, Kronos would be nice but I prefer cash.
|

1-Up Mushroom
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1866
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 17:04:00 -
[106] - Quote
Mekki Muvila wrote:1-Up Mushroom wrote:Brock Nelson wrote:Knowing 1-Up Mushroom, 50m is chump change for him, I think he's just hoping to get you to shut up and move on
Yea it was chump change for me, but it's just nice to help people out every once in a while. I got scammed out of an officer fit Kronos, and I'm really sad about it and :CCP: and broken game and ban scammers. Please make out all contracts to Mekki Muvila, Kronos would be nice but I prefer cash. Make a forum thread about it first, then I'll think about it 
5 Senses In A Person... 4 Seasons In A Year... 3 Colors In A Stoplight... 2 Poles On The Earth... ONLY 1-UP MUSHROOM!!!-á If You Like My Sig, Like Me!-áRemember EVE is EVErything! |

Malaclypse Muscaria
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 18:04:00 -
[107] - Quote
Julyan Fox wrote:If OP got scammed because of poor coding I also find a GM should step in and revert the transactions.
Hell this game is almost 10 years old, it's about time to end the beta and work on those kind of details.
CCP do you want to entertain your playerbase or **** them? Scamming is a good thing for this game, but it should be subtle and clever, not some kind of stupid exploit any uneducated kids can pull out by messing with a clunky UI.
My sentiments exactly. Being allowed to scam is one of the things that makes EVE great and stand out as a game, but not if it's done through exploiting bugs or hacks - no matter if they are used to break the trade window, or to not show up in local to gank 0.0 plexers.
The core game mechanics and UI functionality should work as advertised, for everyone. Letting them stay buggy, broken and ripe for abuse, while expecting players to know not to use them, is not acceptable.
|

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
508
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 18:09:00 -
[108] - Quote
Even though i cannot stand the particulars of the OPs arguing methods, I do admit those who helped him out were rather nice.
Good to see it sometimes.
Also, I will admit that the trade window needs work. Its just not a high priority because EVE rule #7 is never use the trade window if it matters.
Oh and OP, any sympathy I had for you went away when you said you have been here 4 years. Probably should have kept that to yourself. |

Marhaba
Dissolution Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 06:02:00 -
[109] - Quote
Yay, my very own thread of tears.
There was no exploit, and there was no bug. Lag wasn't a factor either. There is also no confirmation window that pops upw hen a trade is changed. I didn't get the domi for free, I paid 95k (though I could have gotten it for free in this case if I wanted it).
Let me break it down very slowly for Zarcan:
1) Zarcan advertises his horribly overpriced failfit Domi in local for 95m 2) I open a trade window 3) I hit "offer isk," enter 95m, hit ok 4) I hit "offer isk" again, backspace off 3 zeroes 5) I wait 6) Zarcan puts in his domi 7) I hit enter twice. The first enter changes the isk offered, the second enter accepts the trade 8) Zarcan immediately accepts the trade
In the time it takes to move his mouse from where he dropped the domi to the accept button, I've already hit enter. That can be done in a fraction of a second; whatever the reaction time is between my eyes registering that something is in the trade window and the signal reaching my right index finger to hit enter. So, from Zarcan's perspective, he saw 95m, dropped his domi and hit enter almost immediately, but still long enough for me to change the price.
I know this isn't news to most of you guys, but Zarcan seems to need the "Scamming for Dummies" version.
I'm surprised this thread stayed in general discussion so long. Shouldn't this have been moved to C&P? I'm also surprised this is my first thread (that I've seen, anyway), and that of all my station trade scams, this is the one that gets me a thread. There was the one I took 4 plexes from... the rigged rattlesnake... oh, and the 14 year old kid that I took 2 plexes from that he had just paid for with his mom's credit card. He accused me of ruining his life. I would have expected a thread from any of those.
But this? A domi I sold for 65m? Kind of a surprise. I didn't even really get any tears at first. It wasn't until about an hour later did the tears start flowing.
Like I said in private convo, "take the loss like a man, learn from your mistake, and pray to whatever God you believe in that I didn't get you for more."
Don't get so offended that somebody bested you at a game. Do you act the same way when somebody beats you in chess? |

Jack Tronic
borkedLabs
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 07:36:00 -
[110] - Quote
There's a bug with the trade UI where it won't update, same bug exists with a few other UI elements, bugs have been reported for the last 2 months.
:CCP: |

Kitten Arbosa
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 08:02:00 -
[111] - Quote
Marhaba wrote:Yay, my very own thread of tears.
There was no exploit, and there was no bug. Lag wasn't a factor either. There is also no confirmation window that pops up when a trade is changed. I didn't get the domi for free, I paid 95k (though I could have gotten it for free in this case if I wanted it).
Let me break it down very slowly for Zarcan:
1) Zarcan advertises his horribly overpriced failfit Domi in local for 95m 2) I open a trade window 3) I hit "offer isk," enter 95m, hit ok 4) I hit "offer isk" again, backspace off 3 zeroes 5) I wait 6) Zarcan puts in his domi 7) I hit enter twice. The first enter changes the isk offered, the second enter accepts the trade 8) Zarcan immediately accepts the trade
In the time it takes to move his mouse from where he dropped the domi to the accept button, I've already hit enter. That can be done in a fraction of a second; whatever the reaction time is between my eyes registering that something is in the trade window and the signal reaching my right index finger to hit enter. So, from Zarcan's perspective, he saw 95m, dropped his domi and hit enter almost immediately, but still long enough for me to change the price.
I know this isn't news to most of you guys, but Zarcan seems to need the "Scamming for Dummies" version.
I'm surprised this thread stayed in general discussion so long. Shouldn't this have been moved to C&P? I'm also surprised this is my first thread (that I've seen, anyway), and that of all my station trade scams, this is the one that gets me a thread. There was the one I took 4 plexes from... the rigged rattlesnake... oh, and the 14 year old kid that I took 2 plexes from that he had just paid for with his mom's credit card. He accused me of ruining his life. I would have expected a thread from any of those.
But this? A domi I sold for 65m? Kind of a surprise. I didn't even really get any tears at first. It wasn't until about an hour later did the tears start flowing.
Like I said in private convo, "take the loss like a man, learn from your mistake, and thank whatever God you believe in that I didn't get you for more."
Don't get so offended that somebody bested you at a game. Do you act the same way when somebody beats you in chess?
Problem is, that's the definition of the trade lag scam, and CCP has said it's an exploit. If it gets petitioned and the logs show something, well..
|

Lady Aja
15
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 08:19:00 -
[112] - Quote
1-Up Mushroom wrote:Brock Nelson wrote:Knowing 1-Up Mushroom, 50m is chump change for him, I think he's just hoping to get you to shut up and move on
Yea it was chump change for me, but it's just nice to help people out every once in a while.
good man..
right up there with me giving away a rattler. |

Ezurae
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 12:38:00 -
[113] - Quote
first thing (someone already mentioned but i believe it didnt reach the op): money of trades is not registered in the transaction journal but in the "normal" journal. If you check there you will probably find that you recieved 95.000 Isk.
second thing: that isnt at all an exploit or using lag or anything. its just using your stupidity of hitting accept right after you entered the ship into the trade window. Yeah there were 95m first, you waited for it before you put your ship in there... but everyone knows it can be changed again before you hit accept. If you would have actually waited a while after entering your ship you would have seen him changing the money... if you really use the trade window, wait a while after you AND him entered the stuff into the trade window before you hit accept...
well or just use the contract system, which would have been the smartest choice for you rigged domi anyways.
btw you really got lucky that some ppl felt they should reward the stupidity of yours...
Out of curiosity did you really not fall for any other huge scams before? because if you never lost quite a few isk multiple times there is no way you can still be this poor after such a long time... Ofc its something totally different if your account was inactive for quite a while which i can not know. |

Miyamato
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 14:14:00 -
[114] - Quote
Someone was nice enough to offer me my first Cruiser in the trade window.
It all ended up just fine. I gave the money, i got the cruiser and we all parted ways happily ever after.
Not everyone is an asshat, but when it comes to the WWW or online gaming, most are. Mainly because they can hide behind their keyboard and theres no real consequence to being a complete asshat. Online is basically what the world would be like if there were no governing rules. There wouldn't be complete and total chaos, but the majority of people would be out to hurt their fellow man, not help. Really, online gaming is humanity in its truest form. You'll find great people, and you'll find utter @#$#@@# people. Like the real world, but the ratio between good / bad is staggeringly higher. I mean, where else in the world can you go and find a 11 year old talking mad @@#^ to someone 3x his age and getting away with it? School yes, but nowhere else does it happen besides online.
I can understand the OP's frustration. But I already knew how this thread would turn out as soon as I saw the line about the trade window bug. There were similar things in UO. Like opening the trade window, throwing in more weight then the other person could carry and making random objects from that persons inventory fall to the ground to pick up due to the overweight issue. Happened all the time.
People are usually out to make money as easily and quickly as possible. Fun be damned. The only thing fun about scamming to the scammer is the reward in the end, and the absolute no risk. Someone on rookie chat the other day was actually openly stating how he can't wait for Dusk 514 just so he has a new line of players to scam from. Trying to get a pat on the back because he has made billions off scamming. Mind boggling really, with how big the game is and how much there is to do. |

Marhaba
Dissolution Syndicate
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 14:31:00 -
[115] - Quote
Kitten Arbosa wrote: Problem is, that's the definition of the trade lag scam, and CCP has said it's an exploit. If it gets petitioned and the logs show something, well..
There was no lag involved. It was only him hitting "accept" without double-checking the amount. I'll need you to show me some proof that changing the amount in a trade window is an exploit, because that would be the first time I've ever heard that. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4424
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 14:38:00 -
[116] - Quote
Kitten Arbosa wrote:Problem is, that's the definition of the trade lag scam, and CCP has said it's an exploit. If it gets petitioned and the logs show something, well.. No, the problem is that it's not a lag scam unless lag is involved. There is nothing to suggest that there was GÇö just that the OP didn't hover over the GÇ£acceptGÇ£ button a second or two longer to finally, finally check the ISK amount before actually accepting.
What happens here: A: Gives a number and accepts. B: Sees the number, drops Domi. A: Alters the number and quickly accepts again GÇö altering the number resets all GÇ£acceptsGÇ¥, but only A has accepted anything so far and he re-accepts in roughly zero seconds due to quick fingers. B: Doesn't notice the change and accepts.
What would be a lag scam: A: Gives a number and does or does not accept (not entirely relevant). B: Sees the number, drops Domi and accepts. A: Alters the number and accepts, the trade goes through before the server can properly register the change and reset B's accept.
So far, it rather seems like the OP failed to do what is the golden standard of trade: always double (triple) check what you're agreeing on before doing so. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
2603
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 14:40:00 -
[117] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Zarcan wrote:Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code. if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once
So far as I am aware, I've never been scammed. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Miyamato
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 14:42:00 -
[118] - Quote
What would make this trade window scamming impossible would be a final screen that shows the absolute end of the trade. Say I am buying a BC for 100 million. The battlecruiser enters the window, I put my money into the window and accept. Then the screen pops up with a final trade of Battlecruiser for 100,000,000. Do you Accept? YES. Then voila, the end result is controlled by the server and everything goes through smoothly.
Pretty easy fix really. |

Marhaba
Dissolution Syndicate
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 14:44:00 -
[119] - Quote
Miyamato wrote:What would make this trade window scamming impossible would be a final screen that shows the absolute end of the trade. Say I am buying a BC for 100 million. The battlecruiser enters the window, I put my money into the window and accept. Then the screen pops up with a final trade of Battlecruiser for 100,000,000. Do you Accept? YES. Then voila, the end result is controlled by the server and everything goes through smoothly.
Pretty easy fix really.
Fix? I'm not convinced anything's broken. |

Ursula LeGuinn
55
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 14:55:00 -
[120] - Quote
I've never been scammed, most likely because I carefully researched EVE scams back when I first started playing, but my account was hacked back in 2006. I'm still not 100% sure what happened, but I strongly suspect I entered my username and password into a spoofed account management page.
I felt really, really stupid, which is a good way to feel when you get hacked.
I've been extremely paranoid since then; my password is hideously complex, and I never enter my login information into any official-looking webpage I haven't already bookmarked after double-, triple- and quadruple-checking the website URL and its credentials. "The EVE forums are intended to provide a warm, friendly atmosphere for the EVE community."-áGÇö-áEVElopedia |

Miyamato
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 15:00:00 -
[121] - Quote
Marhaba wrote:Miyamato wrote:What would make this trade window scamming impossible would be a final screen that shows the absolute end of the trade. Say I am buying a BC for 100 million. The battlecruiser enters the window, I put my money into the window and accept. Then the screen pops up with a final trade of Battlecruiser for 100,000,000. Do you Accept? YES. Then voila, the end result is controlled by the server and everything goes through smoothly.
Pretty easy fix really. Fix? I'm not convinced anything's broken.
All I see are people saying how if you haven't been scammed in Eve then you aren't playing. Meaning everyone in Eve will at some point be scammed. In one way by this trade window thing.
I dunno, I'm just going off what I'm reading in this thread. I have experiencd the trade window though, which is pretty bare bones and something that resembled UO back in 1999. A more secure, and truthworthy trade window is one that has a final acceptance screen that is completely controlled by the server. Server receives the BC, server receives the money, both people agree and a final acceptance appears to the seller and buyer. When both agree, the trade goes through. All in all, pretty easy to do.
Trade window scams have been going on since the hayday of MMO's. Almost the first thing people attempted to try back in UO beta. |
|

ISD Alassien
Community Communications Liaisons
7

|
Posted - 2012.01.15 15:01:00 -
[122] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
So, I've been running a rigged mission domi for some time now. After a good amount of missions and trading, I've got just enough so, if I sell my rigged domi at a little below real value with rigs, I'd be able to outfit a Navy Domi.
So, I go to Jita and offer a sale of my domi for 95mil, send out the message a few times. The rigs were 1x Sentry Drone Damage Aug, 1x Large Nanobot, 1x Large Aux Nano Pump
I get a trade offer, the window pops up. I throw my Domi in to see if that's what he's inquiring about, and I see 95mil in green show up, along with his accept checkmark. I accept as well, and it goes through.
But I never got the 95mil.
Character is Marhaba. He proceeds to say in Jita chat "Thanks for the free domi ;)."
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here?
Zarcan,
It may be worth filing a petition for a GM to look into this - make sure you provide as much detail as possible.
Can we also stay on topic and refrain from flaming one another?  ISD Alassien Lieutenant Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Marhaba
Dissolution Syndicate
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 15:05:00 -
[123] - Quote
Miyamato wrote:Marhaba wrote:Miyamato wrote:What would make this trade window scamming impossible would be a final screen that shows the absolute end of the trade. Say I am buying a BC for 100 million. The battlecruiser enters the window, I put my money into the window and accept. Then the screen pops up with a final trade of Battlecruiser for 100,000,000. Do you Accept? YES. Then voila, the end result is controlled by the server and everything goes through smoothly.
Pretty easy fix really. Fix? I'm not convinced anything's broken. All I see are people saying how if you haven't been scammed in Eve then you aren't playing. Meaning everyone in Eve will at some point be scammed. In one way by this trade window thing. I dunno, I'm just going off what I'm reading in this thread. I have experiencd the trade window though, which is pretty bare bones and something that resembled UO back in 1999. A more secure, and truthworthy trade window is one that has a final acceptance screen that is completely controlled by the server. Server receives the BC, server receives the money, both people agree and a final acceptance appears to the seller and buyer. When both agree, the trade goes through. All in all, pretty easy to do. Trade window scams have been going on since the hayday of MMO's. Almost the first thing people attempted to try back in UO beta.
Scamming is a legitimate game mechanic, and I don't think it's CCP's job to prevent scams. |

Killer Gandry
Shadow of the Pain
25
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 15:06:00 -
[124] - Quote
Hijeri wrote:[quote=Zarcan].Have fun with your mission running, basically the most boring thing you can do in this game along with mining. This is an MMO sandbox, and then you go and voluntarily grind your ass off doing the most mundane thing, as if you're playing World of Warcraft. Hilarious.
Well, I have to say that 0.0 life isn't that thrilling either. Forming up a group and then try to get some action can be boring as hell in 0.0 Either your targets do SS hopping or log off because they are outnumbered or your group does it because they outnumber you vastly.
Next to that you have the awesome Gatecamps, PoS bashes etc. All thrilling and exciting.
|

Miyamato
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 15:08:00 -
[125] - Quote
Marhaba wrote:Miyamato wrote:Marhaba wrote:Miyamato wrote:What would make this trade window scamming impossible would be a final screen that shows the absolute end of the trade. Say I am buying a BC for 100 million. The battlecruiser enters the window, I put my money into the window and accept. Then the screen pops up with a final trade of Battlecruiser for 100,000,000. Do you Accept? YES. Then voila, the end result is controlled by the server and everything goes through smoothly.
Pretty easy fix really. Fix? I'm not convinced anything's broken. All I see are people saying how if you haven't been scammed in Eve then you aren't playing. Meaning everyone in Eve will at some point be scammed. In one way by this trade window thing. I dunno, I'm just going off what I'm reading in this thread. I have experiencd the trade window though, which is pretty bare bones and something that resembled UO back in 1999. A more secure, and truthworthy trade window is one that has a final acceptance screen that is completely controlled by the server. Server receives the BC, server receives the money, both people agree and a final acceptance appears to the seller and buyer. When both agree, the trade goes through. All in all, pretty easy to do. Trade window scams have been going on since the hayday of MMO's. Almost the first thing people attempted to try back in UO beta. Scamming is a legitimate game mechanic, and I don't think it's CCP's job to prevent scams.
I've played a ton of MMO's in my lifetime but I have never once been around a community that actually says scamming is a legitimate mechanic of any kind. Let alone game mechanic.
Lying and stealing someone elses property is not a legitimate mechanic. There is a different between a gullible person falling for a trap and an actual game-creating bug/mechanic that causes the ability to scam. If someone accepts a contracted mission and goes out to the spot to pick up the item and then gets killed, that is a legitimate game mechanic. That is someone setting a legitimate trap, someone falling into it, and getting killed in the process. Thats legitimate.
But if the game has buggy code or lag or something in that nature that creates the ability for someone to lose their hard earned ISK or equipment, that is not at all legitimate. |

Ghoest
239
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 15:15:00 -
[126] - Quote
All scams depends a failure.
Legitimate scams depend on one of 2 things. -a failure to determine is you can trust someone -a failure to understand game mechanics
Illegitimate scams depend on a failure of the game hardware and code to function as intended. Wherever You Went - Here You Are |

Zleon Leigh
56
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 15:31:00 -
[127] - Quote
Marhaba wrote:Miyamato wrote:Marhaba wrote:Miyamato wrote:What would make this trade window scamming impossible would be a final screen that shows the absolute end of the trade. Say I am buying a BC for 100 million. The battlecruiser enters the window, I put my money into the window and accept. Then the screen pops up with a final trade of Battlecruiser for 100,000,000. Do you Accept? YES. Then voila, the end result is controlled by the server and everything goes through smoothly.
Pretty easy fix really. Fix? I'm not convinced anything's broken. All I see are people saying how if you haven't been scammed in Eve then you aren't playing. Meaning everyone in Eve will at some point be scammed. In one way by this trade window thing. I dunno, I'm just going off what I'm reading in this thread. I have experiencd the trade window though, which is pretty bare bones and something that resembled UO back in 1999. A more secure, and truthworthy trade window is one that has a final acceptance screen that is completely controlled by the server. Server receives the BC, server receives the money, both people agree and a final acceptance appears to the seller and buyer. When both agree, the trade goes through. All in all, pretty easy to do. Trade window scams have been going on since the hayday of MMO's. Almost the first thing people attempted to try back in UO beta. Scamming is a legitimate game mechanic, and I don't think it's CCP's job to prevent scams.
Well CCP doesn't totally agree - they finally put the extra warning in on the courier contracts about load volume. Guess they finally got tired of the noob griefing on oversized contracts.
Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital.
CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day |

Marhaba
Dissolution Syndicate
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 15:36:00 -
[128] - Quote
Just curious, why was this not moved to C&P? |

Caldari Citizen345893746
Intergalactic Specialty Tactical Aeon Brokers
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 15:43:00 -
[129] - Quote
This is EVE, please take a seat and prepare for your next scam.
If you are not on the receiving end I would propose you get on the dealing end.
NEXT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |

Zleon Leigh
56
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 15:46:00 -
[130] - Quote
Marhaba wrote:Just curious, why was this not moved to C&P?
Because the OP didn't understand that he had been scammed by a criminal with the assistance of a CCP fail mechanic. He just thought it was a bug.
Then it evolved into a General Discussion on the harm that scamming is having on EVE and the lack of balance in it. Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital.
CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day |

Xavier Holtzman
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
9
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 17:18:00 -
[131] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Zarcan wrote:Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code. if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once
There is no nice way for me to say "You are wrong."
I have been playing since 2005, and I've never been scammed or bankrupted by anybody. And when I say "play" i mean almost every aspect of eve. Trading, mission running, mining, large scale pvp, small scale pvp, and most things in between. |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
13
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 19:43:00 -
[132] - Quote
Marhaba wrote:Miyamato wrote:What would make this trade window scamming impossible would be a final screen that shows the absolute end of the trade. Say I am buying a BC for 100 million. The battlecruiser enters the window, I put my money into the window and accept. Then the screen pops up with a final trade of Battlecruiser for 100,000,000. Do you Accept? YES. Then voila, the end result is controlled by the server and everything goes through smoothly.
Pretty easy fix really. Fix? I'm not convinced anything's broken.
The 95mil was there when I pressed accept. It was lag. |

Brock Nelson
264
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 19:46:00 -
[133] - Quote
Exactly, and how do you expect lag to be fixed? It's been a problem ever since Eve first came out and it's been a problem for every multiplayer game that ever exist. I don't always like to modify my sell order but when I do, I like to spin my mouse wheel |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
13
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 19:52:00 -
[134] - Quote
Brock Nelson wrote:Exactly, and how do you expect lag to be fixed? It's been a problem ever since Eve first came out and it's been a problem for every multiplayer game that ever exist.
In the sense that a game's efficiency is limited by connection speed, sure. I don't really believe that to be an sort of excuse for not correcting insecure trading windows, I haven't encountered this drastic of a trade window exploit problem in any other MMO.
If I'm not mistaken, even SOE (who was notorious for a poor connection with their playerbase, if anyone else was along with the NGE), SWG had an alert window whenever the client modified the order, precisely to prevent this problem. I don't see why this hasn't been implemented, especially in a game that has been around as long as EVE has. They don't like getting petitions any more than we like getting scammed. |

Miyamato
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 19:54:00 -
[135] - Quote
Brock Nelson wrote:Exactly, and how do you expect lag to be fixed? It's been a problem ever since Eve first came out and it's been a problem for every multiplayer game that ever exist.
Well thats easy. Do not make the process lag dependant.
Make it where the trade has to be finalized and accepted on both ends, with no chance at alteration before the trade can actually be completed.
A simple final acceptance screen with the final trade showcased would be something that took a week of coding, probably alot less depending on the amount of people and would completely eliminate any chance of trade window scamming.
You see a screen pop up after both parties agree on the initial trade. The server scans the final trade and pops a message on both screens " You are about to initiate a trade with *player *. *Player* Offers XXXX Item. * You * Offer XXXX ISK/Item in return. Do you Accept?
When both parties hit the accept button, then the trade is finished. Not until then.
Very easy actually. |

Dr Karsun
Coffee Lovers Brewing Club Care Factor
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 19:59:00 -
[136] - Quote
Rule nr 1 of new eden trade - never, ever use the trade window. Issueing a director contract costs 10k isk, next to nothing. If someone insists on trade, it means that his good are either from isk-selling and he can be tracked, or he's scamming you. Either way, not worth the fuss. "Have you had your morning coffee?" -> the Coffee Lovers Brewing Club is recruiting! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=363976#post363976 |

Mara Tessidar
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
376
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 20:05:00 -
[137] - Quote
ISD Alassien wrote:Can we also stay on topic and refrain from flaming one another? 
Is this a serious request? http://goo.gl/uX5vk |

Ai Shun
Shun Industrials and Haulage
131
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 20:34:00 -
[138] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:I think that CCP just wants the extra $15 a month.
Oh, wait, scammers make so much ISK that they just plex.
Hmmmmm. Obviously a completely equitable situation here.
Zarcan, I sympathise with your loss. But you are acting a bit butthurt with that type of comment at the moment and showing how little you know of EVE Online. Two quick points that might help you.
1. ISK for PLEX represents income for CCP. Even if your conspiracy theory holds true, they are still earning income because SOMEBODY has to buy the PLEX.
2. Scamming is part of the EVE Online experience. It is part of why some play it. You need to be careful and not put yourself in danger. Just about all of EVE Online is PVP, including trading, contracts, PI, the whole lot of it. You need to be aware, alert and looking out for yourself. That is why some of the others play it.
Fly safe! And don't fly anything you can't afford to lose  |

Ai Shun
Shun Industrials and Haulage
131
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 20:38:00 -
[139] - Quote
Miyamato wrote:Lying and stealing someone elses property is not a legitimate mechanic. There is a different between a gullible person falling for a trap and an actual game-creating bug/mechanic that causes the ability to scam. If someone accepts a contracted mission and goes out to the spot to pick up the item and then gets killed, that is a legitimate game mechanic. That is someone setting a legitimate trap, someone falling into it, and getting killed in the process. Thats legitimate.
What about the trade scams in Jita? They are lies that end up with somebody stealing anothers' property. |

Captain Dunzel
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 20:38:00 -
[140] - Quote
1-Up Mushroom wrote:Brock Nelson wrote:Knowing 1-Up Mushroom, 50m is chump change for him, I think he's just hoping to get you to shut up and move on
Yea it was chump change for me, but it's just nice to help people out every once in a while.
Personally for me any thread where Tippia takes an opposing view, I have to think that the OP has a Valid point. |

Aiwha
101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
96
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 20:43:00 -
[141] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Tippia wrote:Zarcan wrote:The fault of the decent into a state of tyranny rests on the shoulders of the apathetic. GǪexcept that scamming is explicitly and purposefully allowed by the game designers. Its existence has nothing to do with apathy. ... and why the hell would we as a playerbase tolerate that?
Because most of us don't care. Never been scammed, never will be scammed. (If you want to take that as a challenge, feel free to do so) Regards,
LCpl. Aiwha-á Senior Recruiter |

P42ALPHA
DEAD-ON
34
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 20:48:00 -
[142] - Quote
Feligast wrote:Good luck with that  And I'm so glad you found the money to form your own corp a few minutes ago. Not so broke, huh?
Goons are good trolls, how u fail so bad?
"All hail Wang ... the little fella in Command. When 'trouble' starts to spread, I'm sure he will rise to the occasion."
Azahni Vah'nos (Best reply ever) |

Bloodpetal
Mimidae Risk Solutions
269
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 20:54:00 -
[143] - Quote
Quote:You are receiving a ship through this trade session. Keep in mind that even though you may have been told otherwise, this ship does not necessarily contain any modules or rigs.
If you want to be safe you should accept the ship through an Item Exchange contract instead.
Are you sure you want to continue?
Ya.
Don't trade ships through trade window.
Period, the end.
Mimidae Risk Solutions Recruiting |

Miyamato
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:11:00 -
[144] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Miyamato wrote:Lying and stealing someone elses property is not a legitimate mechanic. There is a different between a gullible person falling for a trap and an actual game-creating bug/mechanic that causes the ability to scam. If someone accepts a contracted mission and goes out to the spot to pick up the item and then gets killed, that is a legitimate game mechanic. That is someone setting a legitimate trap, someone falling into it, and getting killed in the process. Thats legitimate. What about the trade scams in Jita? They are lies that end up with somebody stealing anothers' property.
Is that supposed to be a point?
I'm baffled to be honest. Like I said I have played dozens of MMO's and never once seen a community that is so .... blah .... about scamming.
Usually people complain about it, the devs fix the exploit or scamming method and everyone moves along. In this game, you actually have people saying people play EVE just to scam? You do know this is a game right? The money they make in game, from the scamming, has nothing to do with the real world? So why would someone actually start paying for a game just to scam people for no real reason?
That, in essence, is insane. I dunno. I'm mind blown tbh.
I think the people saying this stuff are the scammers themselves. Thats the only logical explanation. |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
13
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:15:00 -
[145] - Quote
Miyamato wrote:Ai Shun wrote:Miyamato wrote:Lying and stealing someone elses property is not a legitimate mechanic. There is a different between a gullible person falling for a trap and an actual game-creating bug/mechanic that causes the ability to scam. If someone accepts a contracted mission and goes out to the spot to pick up the item and then gets killed, that is a legitimate game mechanic. That is someone setting a legitimate trap, someone falling into it, and getting killed in the process. Thats legitimate. What about the trade scams in Jita? They are lies that end up with somebody stealing anothers' property. Is that supposed to be a point? I'm baffled to be honest. Like I said I have played dozens of MMO's and never once seen a community that is so .... blah .... about scamming. Usually people complain about it, the devs fix the exploit or scamming method and everyone moves along. In this game, you actually have people saying people play EVE just to scam? You do know this is a game right? The money they make in game, from the scamming, has nothing to do with the real world? So why would someone actually start paying for a game just to scam people for no real reason? That, in essence, is insane. I dunno. I'm mind blown tbh. I think the people saying this stuff are the scammers themselves. Thats the only logical explanation.
Perhaps I shouldn't endorse you as I'm not too popular in this thread haha, but indeed, I'm really astounded at how many people actively defend it. I understand its a part of the game, I understand CCP endorses it, I'll never understand why the players fight for it so adamantly.
From my perspective, it doesn't *have* to be this way, and we wouldn't be having this 8 page discussion if it were a black and white issue, as some people would have you believe. |

Solstice Project
Cult of Personality
1263
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:19:00 -
[146] - Quote
Dear OP ...
If you send me 10 Million ISK, i promise you that within two minutes only ...
... ******* NOTHING will happen !
This really works ! It's no scam ! I did it TWICE and it worked BOTH TIMES !!
Just send me the money and see for yourself! Nothing will happen !
Thanks !
(i'm sorry, but i really can't take this topic seriously, after the 9000 others i've read already) Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Ispai Ponue
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:30:00 -
[147] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Marhaba > 0/ Zarcan > So I'm gonna go ahead and humbly request that you give me what's mine. Marhaba > what, like a wardec? Gladly Zarcan > How about that Dominix? You know, that one that represents 1/2 of my capital in EVE Marhaba > i've already sold it. [Contract for 65mil] Zarcan > Well then surely you've got the money to reinburse me.
...
hehehehe
All you're doing is making the dude's day.
You can't possibly get them back, or make them feel bad in any way....but you might have not given them even MORE lols. |

Ezurae
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:32:00 -
[148] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Miyamato wrote:Ai Shun wrote:Miyamato wrote:Lying and stealing someone elses property is not a legitimate mechanic. There is a different between a gullible person falling for a trap and an actual game-creating bug/mechanic that causes the ability to scam. If someone accepts a contracted mission and goes out to the spot to pick up the item and then gets killed, that is a legitimate game mechanic. That is someone setting a legitimate trap, someone falling into it, and getting killed in the process. Thats legitimate. What about the trade scams in Jita? They are lies that end up with somebody stealing anothers' property. Is that supposed to be a point? I'm baffled to be honest. Like I said I have played dozens of MMO's and never once seen a community that is so .... blah .... about scamming. Usually people complain about it, the devs fix the exploit or scamming method and everyone moves along. In this game, you actually have people saying people play EVE just to scam? You do know this is a game right? The money they make in game, from the scamming, has nothing to do with the real world? So why would someone actually start paying for a game just to scam people for no real reason? That, in essence, is insane. I dunno. I'm mind blown tbh. I think the people saying this stuff are the scammers themselves. Thats the only logical explanation. Perhaps I shouldn't endorse you as I'm not too popular in this thread  haha, but indeed, I'm really astounded at how many people actively defend it. I understand its a part of the game, I understand CCP endorses it, I'll never understand why the players fight for it so adamantly. From my perspective, it doesn't *have* to be this way, and we wouldn't be having this 8 page discussion if it were a black and white issue, as some people would have you believe.
cause some people still like a concept called "natural selection". you dont have it in RL but we sure as hell can have it in EVE and removing isk from the "not so smart"-people is part of that. In most cases the scammer will probably even make better use of the isk than the person who fell for the scam (In your case probably true too)... Don't like it? go play WoW ---->
The reason you got scammed is that you were just so greedy that you instantly clicked accept after you put your ship in because you wanted all that money which was way to much for your ship plus rigs. Next time don't be greedy, if you use the trade window, just wait a while before you click accept (even if the other person could still change their mind then). But i guess you are pretty resistent to learning (seeing how old your char is and, well, how far you've gotten...). This time learning will probably especially hard since you even got rewarded for your mistake...
I don't feel bad for anyone who gets scammed. Scamming exploits greediness and stupidity, which is a good thing. I've been playing since Beta and have never ever been scammed even for a single isk. And i also didnt have to read/search anything on the internet to be smart enough and avoid any kind of scam.
There's nothing for free and every deal which sounds to good to be true probably isnt true. But greedy people want to believe its true and because of that get scammed. Nothing wrong with it.
P.S.: Although I'm defending scamming here I do agree that the trade window/trade mechanism could definately improved. But since there are alternative ways to trade with strangers (contracts) I don't see it as one of the pressing issues |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4434
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:35:00 -
[149] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Perhaps I shouldn't endorse you as I'm not too popular in this thread  haha, but indeed, I'm really astounded at how many people actively defend it. I understand its a part of the game, I understand CCP endorses it, I'll never understand why the players fight for it so adamantly. Because it's part of what makes EVE and there is no reason to remove it and make EVE less unique. Scams are great for separating the unwary and inattentive from their cash, and that's entirely in line with the kind of world that the game is build around. Some of the most spectacular stories in EVE GÇö the ones that have been of such a scale that even main-stream media has picked up on them GÇö have been about huge feats of scamming and underhandedness.
Why would you want to make EVE less interesting? if that's what you like, there are plenty of grey-ooze trudgefests with zero requirements on the player's concentration and attention out there. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Ispai Ponue
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:37:00 -
[150] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:
From my perspective, it doesn't *have* to be this way, and we wouldn't be having this 8 page discussion if it were a black and white issue, as some people would have you believe.
Because there's not much that's funnier than watching some idiot that got scammed QQ about it all week. Having to deal with dumb people all day long at work, it's kind of cathartic watching them get bashed to hell in EvE. Watching them beg for the rules to change so they can be dumb all day in EvE too, and watching CCP ignore their cries....it's yummy.
It's true...there are just some aspects of eve that are all about doing all the stuff we can't do in real life because we'd get into trouble and/or have to kill some fool. |

Ispai Ponue
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:47:00 -
[151] - Quote
Miyamato wrote:Brock Nelson wrote:Exactly, and how do you expect lag to be fixed? It's been a problem ever since Eve first came out and it's been a problem for every multiplayer game that ever exist. Well thats easy. Do not make the process lag dependant. Make it where the trade has to be finalized and accepted on both ends, with no chance at alteration before the trade can actually be completed. A simple final acceptance screen with the final trade showcased would be something that took a week of coding, probably alot less depending on the amount of people and would completely eliminate any chance of trade window scamming. You see a screen pop up after both parties agree on the initial trade. The server scans the final trade and pops a message on both screens " You are about to initiate a trade with *player *. *Player* Offers XXXX Item. * You * Offer XXXX ISK/Item in return. Do you Accept? When both parties hit the accept button, then the trade is finished. Not until then. Very easy actually.
It's called " a contract" and to get there you click the contracts window or you can right click the item(s) and say, "create contract." |

Sable Moran
Moran Light Industries
29
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:49:00 -
[152] - Quote
Miyamato wrote:I'm baffled to be honest. Like I said I have played dozens of MMO's and never once seen a community that is so .... blah .... about scamming.
Only stupidity gets you scammed and stupid must be punished people won't learn otherwise. When you get hit through your wallet the lesson usually gets learned.
Miyamato wrote:In this game, you actually have people saying people play EVE just to scam? You do know this is a game right?
The function of a game is to have fun right? If they get their fun scamming they are doing it right. Just because it's not your style of fun doesn't undo that. We are playing a sandbox game, agreed?
Miyamato wrote:The money they make in game, from the scamming, has nothing to do with the real world? So why would someone actually start paying for a game just to scam people for no real reason?
Didn't we just establish that they are having their kind of fun?
Miyamato wrote:That, in essence, is insane. I dunno. I'm mind blown tbh.
Just means you lack life experience. Live some, see the world and stop whining.
Miyamato wrote:I think the people saying this stuff are the scammers themselves. Thats the only logical explanation.
And I think eve is not for you, please go away. Your logic fails, hard.
Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Laboratories Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene. |

Miyamato
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:49:00 -
[153] - Quote
Ispai Ponue wrote:Miyamato wrote:Brock Nelson wrote:Exactly, and how do you expect lag to be fixed? It's been a problem ever since Eve first came out and it's been a problem for every multiplayer game that ever exist. Well thats easy. Do not make the process lag dependant. Make it where the trade has to be finalized and accepted on both ends, with no chance at alteration before the trade can actually be completed. A simple final acceptance screen with the final trade showcased would be something that took a week of coding, probably alot less depending on the amount of people and would completely eliminate any chance of trade window scamming. You see a screen pop up after both parties agree on the initial trade. The server scans the final trade and pops a message on both screens " You are about to initiate a trade with *player *. *Player* Offers XXXX Item. * You * Offer XXXX ISK/Item in return. Do you Accept? When both parties hit the accept button, then the trade is finished. Not until then. Very easy actually. It's called " a contract" and to get there you click the contracts window or you can right click the item(s) and say, "create contract."
Then why have a trade window?
If there is a better alternative to something, usually the other alternative that is both buggy and prone to problems gets eliminated. Odd. |

Ai Shun
132
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:54:00 -
[154] - Quote
Miyamato wrote:Is that supposed to be a point?
I'm baffled to be honest. Like I said I have played dozens of MMO's and never once seen a community that is so .... blah .... about scamming.
Usually people complain about it, the devs fix the exploit or scamming method and everyone moves along. In this game, you actually have people saying people play EVE just to scam? You do know this is a game right? The money they make in game, from the scamming, has nothing to do with the real world? So why would someone actually start paying for a game just to scam people for no real reason?
That, in essence, is insane. I dunno. I'm mind blown tbh.
I think the people saying this stuff are the scammers themselves. Thats the only logical explanation.
Yes, it is. EVE is a brutal game and that is why some of us play it. I enjoy knowing that no matter what I do, somebody is out there to try and take my ISK and shiny ships from me. I enjoy knowing that when I have earned some ISK, I have done so because I've avoided the sharks, played the game well and triumphed. If I can take somebody else's ISK, I'll bask in the warm glow of knowing that on that occasion, I beat them at the market. Or I beat them at a Trade. It is PVP at all levels of the game.
Even when you sell the results of your mission running to the best Buy Order in the Agent Station, some person out there has done their market research, know they can buy it from you cheaply and resell it elsewhere for more profit. They have just won that round of PvP.
It is in all aspects of EVE Online. The constant danger, the constant threat and the satisfaction of actually beating your opponents. That is FUN! I am having a blast playing this game for those aspects. Like I enjoyed playing Trade Wars (BBS game) and others that came after it.
This is not World of Warcraft where we all hold hands in Stormwind and sell Linen Cloth on the Auction House and dance on the mailbox because we're wearing shiny purple clothes. This is a very different game by design and will attract a very different type of player.
And yet, you seem surprised that some of us enjoy this PvP game.
I'm surprised that you play it then, because it has been the core design principles of the game since the very beginning. It is what attracts players to it and, in part, contributes to the niche status the game has.
Why would you consider people playing a game and enjoying it within the design parameters of the game to be insane?
Wouldn't you rather think somebody that can't do that and still plays the game - willingly inflicting self harm - to be insane? |

Ai Shun
132
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 22:02:00 -
[155] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Perhaps I shouldn't endorse you as I'm not too popular in this thread  haha, but indeed, I'm really astounded at how many people actively defend it. I understand its a part of the game, I understand CCP endorses it, I'll never understand why the players fight for it so adamantly. From my perspective, it doesn't *have* to be this way, and we wouldn't be having this 8 page discussion if it were a black and white issue, as some people would have you believe.
You can understand it is part of the game? You can understand it is endorsed by the developer, CCP?
But yet you cannot understand why players defend, do and like it?
Simple.
They are playing the game according to the way it is designed and built and enjoy it.
Scamming is a part of that. And yes, it has to be that way. If you want it another way, there are other games where it is not so rampant. I'm not playing them because I enjoy this. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
290
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 22:06:00 -
[156] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Zarcan wrote:Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code. if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once This is very very true. I've been totally cleaned out both by scams (lookin' at you goons) and ganking. Granted... that was a good while ago... I always seem to learn the hard way but I do learn. All GëíGêçGëí Ships | GëíGêçGëí - sñÜpüÅpü«sÑçsªÖpü¬péópéñpâåpâá | <-- Links to ShowInfo in-game
FX7 - No Tax... No Rules... No Problem |

Rented
Hunter Heavy Industries
11
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 22:20:00 -
[157] - Quote
Never been scammed, never will be.
Never ever use trade window for any serious transaction, no matter how many excuses they make. DO NOT DO IT.
JUST SAY NO TO DRUGS-errr-TRADE! |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 22:48:00 -
[158] - Quote
Hijeri wrote:Zarcan wrote:Mekki Muvila wrote:Your Domi fit sucks anyway The Guristas disagree. You think being able to kill rats enables you to judge whether a fit is good or not? That's freaking hilarious coming from someone like you, who's played this game for years. I can hop into an armor drake and do L4's. Just saying. I see ratters rat with the most stupid fits every day. You'll do good staying in high sec for the rest of your life. Have fun with your mission running, basically the most boring thing you can do in this game along with mining. This is an MMO sandbox, and then you go and voluntarily grind your ass off doing the most mundane thing, as if you're playing World of Warcraft. Hilarious. Agreed. The OP is clearly in the wrong game... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4437
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 22:49:00 -
[159] - Quote
Miyamato wrote:Ispai Ponue wrote:It's called " a contract" and to get there you click the contracts window or you can right click the item(s) and say, "create contract." Then why have a trade window? To quickly transfer things between trusted parties without any cost or setup. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Ispai Ponue
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 22:55:00 -
[160] - Quote
Miyamato wrote:Ispai Ponue wrote:Miyamato wrote:Brock Nelson wrote:Exactly, and how do you expect lag to be fixed? It's been a problem ever since Eve first came out and it's been a problem for every multiplayer game that ever exist. Well thats easy. Do not make the process lag dependant. Make it where the trade has to be finalized and accepted on both ends, with no chance at alteration before the trade can actually be completed. A simple final acceptance screen with the final trade showcased would be something that took a week of coding, probably alot less depending on the amount of people and would completely eliminate any chance of trade window scamming. You see a screen pop up after both parties agree on the initial trade. The server scans the final trade and pops a message on both screens " You are about to initiate a trade with *player *. *Player* Offers XXXX Item. * You * Offer XXXX ISK/Item in return. Do you Accept? When both parties hit the accept button, then the trade is finished. Not until then. Very easy actually. It's called " a contract" and to get there you click the contracts window or you can right click the item(s) and say, "create contract." Then why have a trade window? If there is a better alternative to something, usually the other alternative that is both buggy and prone to problems gets eliminated. Odd.
So that you can do quick, free transactions with trusted people like gang members.
Really, you need to be told this?? |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 00:06:00 -
[161] - Quote
Mara Tessidar wrote:ISD Alassien wrote:Can we also stay on topic and refrain from flaming one another?  Is this a serious request? No kidding, like that's any help....
|

Jovan Geldon
SniggWaffe EVE Corporation 123566322353
282
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 00:25:00 -
[162] - Quote
You are bad at this game and should probably biomass all your characters
Also lie down under a bus IRL please, I object vehemently to you wasting oxygen by your continual existence |

M5 Tuttle
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
30
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 03:00:00 -
[163] - Quote
Disdaine wrote:+1 eve community.
Derp your fit sucks.
Derp hi-sec player.
Derp you got scammed by someone abusing a broken trade mechanic. I will not acknowledge that this game lacks a secure player to player trade mechanic like every other mmo, but instead I will call you stupid for trying to use it.
Here's my 2 cents:
If he was scammed by exploiting lag or a bug, then it is not his fault and he should be compensated. CCP is to blame, not the scammer (unless CCP has some sort of policy against exploiting bugs like most MMO's do).
If he was not scammed using some sort of exploit, then he's a dumbass, happens to everyone, get over it, etc. |

Belidos Goveko
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 08:36:00 -
[164] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:Andski wrote:Montevius Williams wrote:So a better statement would be to say that risk is situational, dumbass idiot.  Because that's the only situation where wasted time is possible, right? With margin trading scams, you have the risk that someone with a stockpile of whatever item you're working with will dump into your buy order. With public contract scams, you risk a ton of ISK in fees. Trade window scams are a "grey area" and exploiting lag comes with the risk of a ban, if the GM is inclined to investigate and concludes that taking advantage of lag (which isn't a real game mechanic) was your intent. Now, when you complain about scamming being risk-free, you're being selective of what you consider a "risk," but of course, ISK or time wasted isn't a risk, right? I never said that scamming should be risk free - please link to where I said that. And no, time wasting is not a risk...YOU are the one making a blanket statement on this. Not me. Hell, if you want to say its relative to the person doing it, fine. But in and of itself, time wasting is not a risk. Margin Trading - Risking Isk Public Contracts -Risking Isk These are fine becasue you are risking isk, but we are not talking about that, we're talking about wasting time and if time is a risk or not.
Wrong, wasting time is a risk, if you spend 1hr trying to scam someone and it fails, that is one hour you could have been earning isk by other means and thus you are risking garunteed isk for possible higher isk by choosing the path you chose versus the path you could have chosen. |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
348
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 08:53:00 -
[165] - Quote
opportunity cost
welp, here we go! |

ariana ailith
Aribar Conglomerate
31
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 09:07:00 -
[166] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:I'm just really surprised that you all feel that way.
I guess this is another issue however, the trade window is the culprit.
If the right DEV happens to read this, the petition is filed, please get back to me.
You, sir, need to quit eve and start WoW. It's been said multiple times. Scamming is part of EVE. You got ripped off. Move on. Live with it!
This thread is even more useless than all the whining about how bad EVE has become without taking any action. |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
476
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 09:21:00 -
[167] - Quote
While the OP practically scammed himself by using a trade window I do like the comments of the guys that say that every action in EVE has an equal reaction but scamming doesn't.
Perhaps some thought should be put into making scamming and scammer more visible not unlike an honor system or an ebay rating. I might not make 1 day alts with scamming in mind detectable but it would make serious traders more known and you'd at least know who was trustworthy(ish).
How he fit his domi and where he likes to play his game has nothing to do with the current discussion.
as a final note I'd just want to ad that you'd only use trade windows among friends or people you trust for quick interaction, I think that was its primary use (like giving ammo and ships before shipping out somewhere). when you deal with strangers you use contract systems because people are bad. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Mnengli Noiliffe
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 10:02:00 -
[168] - Quote
in certain other game i played you can't do any changes to trade window at all, save from adding more stuff or cancelling and starting a new one, and that is a smart design decision in my opinion. |

Ursula LeGuinn
60
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 10:50:00 -
[169] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:Perhaps some thought should be put into making scamming and scammer more visible not unlike an honor system or an ebay rating. I might not make 1 day alts with scamming in mind detectable but it would make serious traders more known and you'd at least know who was trustworthy(ish).
Such a system would be far too easy to abuse. "The EVE forums are intended to provide a warm, friendly atmosphere for the EVE community."-áGÇö-áEVElopedia |

Nadine Le'Slut
The-Four-HorseMen
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 12:23:00 -
[170] - Quote
never ever use tradewindows, not even between your alts
quite a memorable experience, donating a 5b vindi to a half year l4 greenie. by the time i Alt-Tabbed, i made his day |

March rabbit
Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx
110
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 13:25:00 -
[171] - Quote
Hijeri wrote:Zarcan wrote:Mekki Muvila wrote:Your Domi fit sucks anyway The Guristas disagree. You think being able to kill rats enables you to judge whether a fit is good or not? That's freaking hilarious coming from someone like you, who's played this game for years. I can hop into an armor drake and do L4's. Just saying. I see ratters rat with the most stupid fits every day. You'll do good staying in high sec for the rest of your life. Have fun with your mission running, basically the most boring thing you can do in this game along with mining. This is an MMO sandbox, and then you go and voluntarily grind your ass off doing the most mundane thing, as if you're playing World of Warcraft. Hilarious. have any problems with fits not from categories "fleet OPs" or "battleclinik approved"? 
well. some day you will fit your ships with your ideas in mind.... just wait for some time, child..... |

Marhaba
Dissolution Syndicate
9
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 17:50:00 -
[172] - Quote
So what did the GMs say? Let me take a wild guess: "Our logs show nothing."
Plenty of people have said they're petitioning me, and I've never had a GM say a word to me, because what I do is perfectly legal. In other news, I just got a Rattlesnake BPC for 0.35m. Haters gonna hate. |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
200
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 18:01:00 -
[173] - Quote
Belidos Goveko wrote:Montevius Williams wrote:Andski wrote:Montevius Williams wrote:So a better statement would be to say that risk is situational, dumbass idiot.  Because that's the only situation where wasted time is possible, right? With margin trading scams, you have the risk that someone with a stockpile of whatever item you're working with will dump into your buy order. With public contract scams, you risk a ton of ISK in fees. Trade window scams are a "grey area" and exploiting lag comes with the risk of a ban, if the GM is inclined to investigate and concludes that taking advantage of lag (which isn't a real game mechanic) was your intent. Now, when you complain about scamming being risk-free, you're being selective of what you consider a "risk," but of course, ISK or time wasted isn't a risk, right? I never said that scamming should be risk free - please link to where I said that. And no, time wasting is not a risk...YOU are the one making a blanket statement on this. Not me. Hell, if you want to say its relative to the person doing it, fine. But in and of itself, time wasting is not a risk. Margin Trading - Risking Isk Public Contracts -Risking Isk These are fine becasue you are risking isk, but we are not talking about that, we're talking about wasting time and if time is a risk or not. Wrong, wasting time is a risk, if you spend 1hr trying to scam someone and it fails, that is one hour you could have been earning isk by other means and thus you are risking garunteed isk for possible higher isk by choosing the path you chose versus the path you could have chosen.
So by placing a scam public contract and then going about your buisness (mining, missing running, pvping) you are wasting time? Seems to me you are doing both? Unless you're in station staring at the screen waiting for someone to bite...or unless you have a bot scamming local (but scammers dont do that ) |

Ai Shun
134
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 19:53:00 -
[174] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:Perhaps some thought should be put into making scamming and scammer more visible not unlike an honor system or an ebay rating. I might not make 1 day alts with scamming in mind detectable but it would make serious traders more known and you'd at least know who was trustworthy(ish).
Hasn't this thread just done so? The OP lists the name of the scammer and he gloats a little about it in the thread. I know that I have him flagged now so I know he will try this type of trick.
Seems to be working for me?
|

shannon johanson
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 21:29:00 -
[175] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
So, I've been running a rigged mission domi for some time now. After a good amount of missions and trading, I've got just enough so, if I sell my rigged domi at a little below real value with rigs, I'd be able to outfit a Navy Domi.
So, I go to Jita and offer a sale of my domi for 95mil, send out the message a few times. The rigs were 1x Sentry Drone Damage Aug, 1x Large Nanobot, 1x Large Aux Nano Pump
I get a trade offer, the window pops up. I throw my Domi in to see if that's what he's inquiring about, and I see 95mil in green show up, along with his accept checkmark. I accept as well, and it goes through.
But I never got the 95mil.
Character is Marhaba. He proceeds to say in Jita chat "Thanks for the free domi ;)."
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here?
"Sorry m8, but I'm afraid CCP will (after they get off the floor laughing their arses off) will tell you, we're sorry but you were suckered. I do it all the time, just be thankful I didn't do it to you. And as far as I know, there's no warning window popping up letting you know I modified the trade. any modifications would have removed your green checkmark, so you didn't catch the mofication. lol, you sure you aren't playing "WOW"?   |

Implying Implications
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
11
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 21:35:00 -
[176] - Quote
Biomass yourself OP. |

Nephilius
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
291
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 00:18:00 -
[177] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪexcept that scamming is explicitly and purposefully allowed by the game designers. Its existence has nothing to do with apathy.
I'm calling Shenanigans on that comment. The contracts system has been revamped more than a couple of times to help prevent scamming, at least from being stupidly easy. I remember the days where someone could name a Raven "Caldari Navy Raven" and scam some poor sucker who saw that. These days, you have to get pretty creative to pull off a decent scam, or just get a victim that's asleep at the wheel. If you bring down a giant, you're a hero. If you kill something weak-even if it has to die-then you will endure contempt. |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
351
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 00:22:00 -
[178] - Quote
i just scammed some fool in rens just to spite OP |

Aio Hekki
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 19:00:00 -
[179] - Quote
Hey OP, dont listen to those evil scammers) I not consider them as humans ever, there is many good peoples in eve just like in real life)) Fly safe |

1-Up Mushroom
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1895
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 22:53:00 -
[180] - Quote
Aio Hekki wrote:Hey OP, dont listen to those evil scammers) I not consider them as humans ever, there is many good peoples in eve just like in real life)) Fly safe This^
(As long as it wasn't sarcastic or trolling) 5 Senses In A Person... 4 Seasons In A Year... 3 Colors In A Stoplight... 2 Poles On The Earth... ONLY 1-UP MUSHROOM!!!-á If You Like My Sig, Like Me!-áRemember EVE is EVErything! |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
157
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 22:57:00 -
[181] - Quote
Zarcan wrote: But I never got the 95mil.
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here?
Zarcan wrote: Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh?
I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
I'm not trying to rag on you or anything but.... How did something worth 95 million ISK to you, end up being your largest asset after four years? |

Ayuren Aakiwa
K1llUminat1
7
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 02:52:00 -
[182] - Quote
JC Anderson wrote:Zarcan wrote: But I never got the 95mil.
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here? Zarcan wrote: Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh?
I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
I'm not trying to rag on you or anything but.... How did something worth 95 million ISK to you, end up being your largest asset after four years?
This, this so hard. |

Ai Shun
135
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 02:57:00 -
[183] - Quote
Ayuren Aakiwa wrote:JC Anderson wrote:Zarcan wrote: But I never got the 95mil.
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here? Zarcan wrote: Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh?
I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
I'm not trying to rag on you or anything but.... How did something worth 95 million ISK to you, end up being your largest asset after four years? This, this so hard.
That's what she said? |

Dannes Mistry
Paladin Enterprises Inc. B.S.I.
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 04:03:00 -
[184] - Quote
After reading through a lot of this (I did get slighty bored with it towards the end) I only got one thing to really say. Why should the game mechanics get changed just cos you got scammed? if you had bothered to look up on popular scams in eve, you would have noticed that this is near the damn top. If you had used your common sense, and instead said to the guy who interested in buying, I just set up a contract, and then you can buy, you wouldnt be having this problem. it what contracts are there for. it takes barely more then a minute to set up a contract. I have given money to people who have been scammed but these have mostly been people with two-three month or younger life. the fact that you have a 4 year old toon, and did it with a 95 mill domi, suggest that even if you havent played the total of those 4 years, you damn well been playing long enough to have known better. Accept that scams are a great part of this game. Sure it frustrating. sure I have taken a hit on my main char, (to the tune of about 1.2 bill. messed up reading a contract. entirely my fault.) but the whine fest people are having on this atm, is going too far. you wanna feel safe, go and be a WOW noob. are some of the game mechanics a bit messed up? well sure. it an 8 year old game. some of the mechanics frankly dont make sense, cos parts of it got changed or phased out. Do I wish sometimes these things got fixed? yeah sure. But at the end of the day, I play this game, cos I like it, and am willing to put up with current game mechanics and accept that some of it will change soon, and some of it probably wont be fixed for another 8 years. If you cant deal with that then why the hell are you playing? if you play this game you accept it all. the fact that you can be PVPed, (even if you dont want to) anywhere, or scammed in jita, or just that some git just nicked your jetcan and killed you when you thought you could do him instead. The game mechanics do not need to be changed to the extent that a MINORITY think it does. if you want the mechanics to be more wow like, then go and join wow. if you want it to be more rift like, then go and play rift. This is EVE ONLINE. If you cant hack playing it, then sod off. HTFU |

Seleia O'Sinnor
Drop of Honey
162
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 08:52:00 -
[185] - Quote
Now I was in need of some chat channels and I stumbled across this:
When I remove a chat window, which can be closed, let's call it foobar. Now I minimize foobar, and it gets stacked within the chat button. No new button in the Neocom. When I minimize foobar while being in one window with local and corp it gets grouped as a new info button. Please, this is not usable, it just feels awkward.
The info button blends in perfectly with other minimized windows like info windows of items and scanner. How can I tell those apart? For chats it was perfect to have the title of the window as a thin bar minimized at the bottom of the screen so I could see which chat window is active and get back to it.
We really could do with small captions, especially for chat channels, make the neocom wider. Eve community: An angry mob of bright people hunting witches, more torches, more hay forks, growing and growing. |

Cebraio
Starfire Oasis
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 11:11:00 -
[186] - Quote
Miyamato wrote: I've played a ton of MMO's in my lifetime but I have never once been around a community that actually says scamming is a legitimate mechanic of any kind. Let alone game mechanic.
Welcome to EVE! Scamming IS legitimate here and it should be. This is not Ponies Online, this game is for people who can use their brains (or at least wait some seconds to triple check their trades).
Zarcan wrote: ...., but indeed, I'm really astounded at how many people actively defend it. I understand its a part of the game, I understand CCP endorses it, I'll never understand why the players fight for it so adamantly.
From my perspective, it doesn't *have* to be this way, and we wouldn't be having this 8 page discussion if it were a black and white issue, as some people would have you believe.
Again someone who wants EVE to be dumbed down and made a safe and friendly place for everyone. I hear, some MMOs provide pure PVE servers with instant gratification. Why not play those instead?
I had some sympathy with the OP at first, but Marhaba confirmed that OP just made a stupid mistake and thus this is just another day in EVE.
On a side note, I have never been scammed in EVE during the last 8 years (maybe 4 years actual playing). I once set up a wrong contract (when they were still called "escrow") and lost a good amount of money. But I asked nicely and got my money back.
Not everyone in EVE is bad, but the ones who want to play bad should be allowed to do so!
|

flakeys
Arkham Innovations
197
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 13:57:00 -
[187] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Brock Nelson wrote:Exactly, and how do you expect lag to be fixed? It's been a problem ever since Eve first came out and it's been a problem for every multiplayer game that ever exist. In the sense that a game's efficiency is limited by connection speed, sure. I don't really believe that to be an sort of excuse for not correcting insecure trading windows, I haven't encountered this drastic of a trade window exploit problem in any other MMO. If I'm not mistaken, even SOE (who was notorious for a poor connection with their playerbase, if anyone else was along with the NGE), SWG had an alert window whenever the client modified the order, precisely to prevent this problem. I don't see why this hasn't been implemented, especially in a game that has been around as long as EVE has. They don't like getting petitions any more than we like getting scammed.
SOE also did a weeks reroll a lot of the times on SWG servers without any compensation what so ever wich made your week gaming be for jack **** too , changed the game overnight completely and didn't/doesn't give a **** about customers.Now could we please not compare SWG and EVE because it is giving me shivers allready.
Thanks |

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp
277
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 14:21:00 -
[188] - Quote
Morganta wrote: if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once
Yup.... Lost almost everything I had at a Gate Camp once. It was own darn fault, I was being stupid and knew better. Impatience kills a lot more Characters than anything else does in this game. Fast forward to this weekend, full load of Amarr Fuel Blocks in my Impel and I sat and waited 6 hours at a gate safe at a border HS/LS gate for a camp to get bored before proceeding. Lesson learned. Two things you need to be successful in this game are patience and preserverance. Patience to wait for the right moment to act. Preserverance to pick up the pieces and move on when it all comes crashing down.
I feel for you OP, but look at this as a defining moment in your EVE career. Are you going to rage quit or are you going to take a deep breath and not succumb to frustration and leave the game. My Sig says it all IMO. This pain will be useful to you in the future.
If not then EVE is not for you. 'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you. |

Lamperouge Kasenumi
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 17:09:00 -
[189] - Quote
Lol some answers are so funny,
Here's the real answer to the question: Is scamming in Eve ok? It depends!
Crazy isn't it, there's some condition, check this out!
Scamming is only ok when it's done within the expected behavior of the game. If a bug allow you to scam people, it's an exploit and should not be tolerated by CCP.
From what I understand of the OP, this is an exploit and should not be tolerated.
And big lol at the "you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE" crowd, now you are just being silly. |

Bait James
Beasts of Burden The 99 Percent
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 19:15:00 -
[190] - Quote
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=519066
What happened to that topic?? |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
21
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 19:32:00 -
[191] - Quote
Holy crap, 10 pages of people continuously ranting at me. Why is this thread still alive?
I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed. It's a pathetic cop out that CCP told me to "avoid the trade window" because if it's faulty mechanics.
If something doesn't work right in your game, fix it. Especially when it's as black and white as the trade window not having a 2nd stage confirmation window before the transaction goes through.
JC Anderson wrote:Zarcan wrote: But I never got the 95mil.
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here? Zarcan wrote: Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh?
I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
I'm not trying to rag on you or anything but.... How did something worth 95 million ISK to you, end up being your largest asset after four years?
I've only been active for maybe a year and a half out of those four years. 13.7mil sp. College and work make it tough to manage a game like this sometimes. |

Ai Shun
203
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 19:38:00 -
[192] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed.
ORLY? There are other things that need fixing more. Like checking the trade before hitting accept. |

Bait James
Beasts of Burden The 99 Percent
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 19:45:00 -
[193] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Zarcan wrote:I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed. ORLY? There are other things that need fixing more. Like checking the trade before hitting accept.
He wouldn't have been able to do anything no matter how long he checked. It is an exploit as outlined here http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=517991&page=1 It was supposed to have been fixed 5 years ago |

Velicitia
Open Designs
460
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 20:32:00 -
[194] - Quote
Nephilius wrote:Tippia wrote:GǪexcept that scamming is explicitly and purposefully allowed by the game designers. Its existence has nothing to do with apathy. I'm calling Shenanigans on that comment. The contracts system has been revamped more than a couple of times to help prevent scamming, at least from being stupidly easy. I remember the days where someone could name a Raven "Caldari Navy Raven" and scam some poor sucker who saw that. These days, you have to get pretty creative to pull off a decent scam, or just get a victim that's asleep at the wheel.
1. create contract for 750m isk for 1 unit of carbon 2. link in jita chat as "Charon" 3. ??? 4. Profit.
wals always my favourite. Thankfully I was too spacepoor to ever fall for that one. came close to getting nailed on a PLEX for 350m (and a PLEX) contract once or twice though. |

Marhaba
Dissolution Syndicate
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 22:48:00 -
[195] - Quote
Bait James wrote:Ai Shun wrote:Zarcan wrote:I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed. ORLY? There are other things that need fixing more. Like checking the trade before hitting accept. He wouldn't have been able to do anything no matter how long he checked. It is an exploit as outlined here http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=517991&page=1It was supposed to have been fixed 5 years ago
But that's NOT the scam that I used. I never hit accept while 95m was shown. I changed the amount before I hit accept. In your link, the amount is changed after. So, please don't slander me and accuse me of exploiting.
If he had waited for me to hit accept first, there would have been no problem. Then again, i would have never hit accept with 95m in the window, so he'd be waiting a long time. |

Valentyn3
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 22:56:00 -
[196] - Quote
JC Anderson wrote:Zarcan wrote: But I never got the 95mil.
Zarcan wrote:Hey guys.
Considering that that ship was my largest asset, I'm pretty infuriated. I don't know if this was some bug, scam, or what. Would CCP listen to a petition?
What do I do from here? Zarcan wrote: Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh?
I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
I'm not trying to rag on you or anything but.... How did something worth 95 million ISK to you, end up being your largest asset after four years?
Maybe he wasn't playing that much or took a long hiatus.
"Absolutely no jabs or fast punches of any kind. Jabbers can not be on our team." |

Brock Nelson
321
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 23:36:00 -
[197] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Holy crap, 10 pages of people continuously ranting at me. Why is this thread still alive?
If you didn't want to get this kind of attention then don't create ANY thread ok?
You can simply request to have the thread locked by clicking on the little flag icon I don't always like to modify my sell order but when I do, I like to spin my mouse wheel |

Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
189
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 00:15:00 -
[198] - Quote
You got scammed.
Trade window is not safe, and while this particular scam might be different if it is in fact exploiting lag, I wouldn't hold your breath.
You could've prevented this by using the contract system.
It's not just about the "risk vs. reward", it's also about "carelessness and laziness both have a price in eve". |

Duvida
The Scope Gallente Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 00:35:00 -
[199] - Quote
Ris Dnalor wrote:You got scammed.
Trade window is not safe, and while this particular scam might be different if it is in fact exploiting lag, I wouldn't hold your breath.
You could've prevented this by using the contract system.
It's not just about the "risk vs. reward", it's also about "carelessness and laziness both have a price in eve".
That's the deal, it's a broken game mechanic. You really can't use a feature of the game because of it. It'd be like someone discovering a way to swipe inventory from others' hangers. It's a broken part of the game being exploited. |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
384
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 01:07:00 -
[200] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Zarcan wrote:Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code. if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once
speak for yourself. never scammed. |

Bait James
Beasts of Burden The 99 Percent
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 03:00:00 -
[201] - Quote
Marhaba wrote:Bait James wrote:Ai Shun wrote:Zarcan wrote:I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed. ORLY? There are other things that need fixing more. Like checking the trade before hitting accept. He wouldn't have been able to do anything no matter how long he checked. It is an exploit as outlined here http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=517991&page=1It was supposed to have been fixed 5 years ago But that's NOT the scam that I used. I never hit accept while 95m was shown. I changed the amount before I hit accept. In your link, the amount is changed after. So, please don't slander me and accuse me of exploiting. If he had waited for me to hit accept first, there would have been no problem. Then again, i would have never hit accept with 95m in the window, so he'd be waiting a long time.
What you did is exactly the same exploit. Hard to weasel out when you describe how you did it, and the entire trick relies on the lag of a high pop system to pull off.
It is an exploit. Has been for 5 years. Learn to scam without needing to exploit. |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
34
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 04:09:00 -
[202] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Zarcan wrote:The fault of the decent into a state of tyranny rests on the shoulders of the apathetic. GǪexcept that scamming is explicitly and purposefully allowed by the game designers. Its existence has nothing to do with apathy.
I would classify being scammed by a lagging trade window as an exploit. The particular one has been around for years and resulting in the loss of at least one T2 BPO (before invention).
|

Toto Zinny
GWA Corp
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 05:35:00 -
[203] - Quote
If the player found a exploit that allowed them to steal money from CCP, then I am sure that CCP would sit up and take notice. If this exploit exists then it should be fixed in some way, asap. |

Marhaba
Dissolution Syndicate
20
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 02:02:00 -
[204] - Quote
Bait James wrote:Marhaba wrote:Bait James wrote:Ai Shun wrote:Zarcan wrote:I don't have the time or patience to respond to all of these posts, the bottom line is that the trade window is broken and needs to be addressed. ORLY? There are other things that need fixing more. Like checking the trade before hitting accept. He wouldn't have been able to do anything no matter how long he checked. It is an exploit as outlined here http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=517991&page=1It was supposed to have been fixed 5 years ago But that's NOT the scam that I used. I never hit accept while 95m was shown. I changed the amount before I hit accept. In your link, the amount is changed after. So, please don't slander me and accuse me of exploiting. If he had waited for me to hit accept first, there would have been no problem. Then again, i would have never hit accept with 95m in the window, so he'd be waiting a long time. What you did is exactly the same exploit. Hard to weasel out when you describe how you did it, and the entire trick relies on the lag of a high pop system to pull off. It is an exploit. Has been for 5 years. Learn to scam without needing to exploit.
It's not, though. In the exploit version, your screen can show the correct amount of isk and a green check mark. In my version, there is NEVER a green check mark with the correct amount of isk. This is a critical difference. My scam can be avoided by simply waiting for my green check mark to appear, looking at the amount of isk it shows, and then hitting accept.
My marks are either hitting accept as soon as they drop their item in the window (meaning they didn't have time to re-check the isk), or they didn't pay close attention to the number of zeroes after seeing I had hit accept.
I've had something like two dozen people tell me that they are petitioning me for exploiting, and not once has a GM so much as said a peep to me. This is not an exploit. If you want to continue claiming it is an exploit, you'll need to provide some proof, since you're the one making the claim. |

Argaral
Obstergo NEM3SIS.
20
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 02:13:00 -
[205] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:Morganta wrote:Zarcan wrote:Seatox wrote:The trade window is terrible, and vulnerable to sleight of hand - and you shouldn't use it for commerce.
What probably happened was they put in 95 million, then zeroed it *and then hit accept*, and you didn't notice them zeroing the value before you hit accept.
Use the contract system instead. Nope, I'm aware of that tactic. The 95mil was there. Feligast wrote: and it's unlikely your petition would result in anything. Chalk it up as an eve lesson and get back at it. Well this is unacceptable. That ship is worth 1/3 of my savings in the game, and I lost it due to poor game mechanics. I shouldn't be liable for unsatisfactory trade window code. if you haven't been bankrupt by a scam or gank at least once, you haven't been playing EVE They wont admit it, but everyone here has had it happen in some form or another at least once Well then, My 4 year old character shouldn't exist, eh? I'm not gonna accept that, sorry. CCP is gonna have to get back to me on this one.
What are you, ********?
You got scammed, legitimately by a very widely known scam. If in 4 years, you haven't been affected congratulations on pure luck. If that dominix was 1/3 of your savings, buy another one and rat with it. Hell you can afk rat with the thing to get its cost back in a night. If it was your first BC and had nothing but a noobship, we may feel a bit more sorry
For now, you've copped a set back. You'll recover easily. Welcome to EVE
|

Rubix Khamsi
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 03:47:00 -
[206] - Quote
trade window should be fixed...Even if the other user edited his ISK back to zero and clicked the check mark again...Its hardly noticeable and IMO is not working as intended...
Fix it! |

nate555
GODHC INTERSTELLAR FLEET
42
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 04:27:00 -
[207] - Quote
Scamming is only legal up to a certain point. You have valid defense. I hope you get your isk back |

Ehn Roh
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 06:14:00 -
[208] - Quote
Zarcan wrote:I'm just really surprised that you all feel that way.
.
No you're not, or else you wouldn't have spent all your time bumbling around hi-sec.
People are piling on your for ranting that you expect that ripping people off would somehow be ban-able because it's a ridiculous statement from a "vet".
Exploiting is obviously not cool and lag sucks. Not a fan of intentionally obtuse interfaces either.
But scamming is a valid use of one's gameplay time, as is murdering, extorting, stealing, terrorizing, anchoring giant -secure-can dong statues, and just plain blowing crap up.
Not everyone wants to do it, but when people do something constructive it is all the more impressive that they managed to get it done despite all that other nonsense going on.
|

Riley Moore
Sentinum Research
320
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 07:00:00 -
[209] - Quote
Check your wallet transactions. (from AGLAIA Thaleia, which is my trade alt).
Everyone eventually gets burned on something. UI is ****. Live and learn.
Live long and prosper Large volumes of highly researched Ammo, drones, charges and ship bpo's. Biggest BPO store in EVE! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=445524#post445524 |

Zarcan
Liberate New Eden
23
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 07:02:00 -
[210] - Quote
Ehn Roh wrote:Zarcan wrote:I'm just really surprised that you all feel that way.
. No you're not, or else you wouldn't have spent all your time bumbling around hi-sec. People are piling on your for ranting that you expect that ripping people off would somehow be ban-able because it's a ridiculous statement from a "vet". Exploiting is obviously not cool and lag sucks. Not a fan of intentionally obtuse interfaces either. But scamming is a valid use of one's gameplay time, as is murdering, extorting, stealing, terrorizing, anchoring giant -secure-can dong statues, and just plain blowing crap up. Not everyone wants to do it, but when people do something constructive it is all the more impressive that they managed to get it done despite all that other nonsense going on.
I think we've seen pretty decent evidence that this is an exploit that needs to be fixed.
Riley Moore wrote:Check your wallet transactions. (from AGLAIA Thaleia, which is my trade alt). Everyone eventually gets burned on something. UI is ****. Live and learn. Live long and prosper
Wow. Thank you sir. o7 |

Jacob Stiller
The Scope Gallente Federation
1117
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 07:18:00 -
[211] - Quote
I'm amazed that this thread is still alive. Only the Eve Online community could amuse themselves for three weeks over someone being burned by something as obscure as a "lag scam." |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: [one page] |