| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 09:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
http://www.swtor.com/server-status
Also read
swtor.com on their forums, wow I am a bit shocked to be honest, I know from my own experience that the game sucks and would fail but when I quit and deleted it my EU server was very heavy and minimum heavy.
I also read that EA lied about their figures like they did with warhammer online.
It seem that the 2 million sold copies were to retail and the 1.7 million subs was at end of December and that the only real data provided by EA as to how many play the game is that "Most" people still play
EA, we love you /not
So, Warhammer failed and now SWToR right? So third time's the charm? 
TORTANIC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5F0A2B8fmU&feature=related
I will always remember the Biodrones, they have a special place among fandom 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P2zkzXX3XE&feature=related |

Kattshiro
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 15:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Why do you care so much if a game succeeds or doesnt if you dont play it?
Also aren't you the guy that lauded it before it's release, and people proclaimed that it wasn't anything new or special rather new with a star wars twist, and voice acting? You then fervently disagreed and told us how wrong we were?
Read last week that sales figures put it at 1.5 millionish. Didnt say active subs, but given that many bought the what? 200 dollar uber peuter box set, and regular 60 price tag. I dunno if i'd call that a total failure. (sales figures are reported by retailers).
http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/02/01/ea-reveals-swtor-subscription-and-sales-numbers-beats-financial/
Kinda funny that many want to see other games fail... MMO wise or we put so much stock in subscription numbers rise and fall. It's also funny that numbers are relative to the specific game so EVE = 300kish == success. (8years) (I dont disagree) AOC 150ksih a few years == total failure. Rift 500kish started out with 1 millionish == semi failure.
What would be interesting is to see how many total have subbed for eve over it's life time v. the number of subscribers now. People make such a big deal over initial sales volume v. current subs. I would argue this is very normal as many are just trying it out or move on to other things. Much is the same of single player games or instanced MMO's (FPS) most people dont just stick around with 1 until its end of days. Many MMO players only seem to play 1 game and one game only (I dont understand this or do this, but whatever) So their belief is because of this a game == failure.
But really what defines failure in an MMO? I'd say if it's still running and earning money even if it has a low player base. |

Lyrka Bloodberry
Spybeaver
69
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 15:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ehm, the European Servers are all at standard population at 5 pm, so before primetime. That is not really bad... Of course the servers were full in the first month after release, because... well... it was the first month.
I think you are pretty much overinterpreting. Spybeaver |

stoicfaux
742
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 16:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kattshiro wrote:But really what defines failure in an MMO? I'd say if it's still running and earning money even if it has a low player base. Investors have certain expectations and get cranky if the sub counts aren't as high as they expected them to be.
As for the general "we want to see SWTOR fail spectacularly " pessimism, IMO, SWTOR represents the stagnation (in terms of new ideas/features/paradigms) of the MMO industry, which is making people cranky because they're bored with the status quo. OTOH, it could simply mean that MMOs are now accessible to a much broader audience (i.e. grandma) and MMOs are focusing on appealing to a broader market instead of trying to keep the MMO veterans (aka the old guard, HTFU, teethed on EQ/UO, l33t players,) entertained.
You can tell me what is and isn't Truth when you pry the tinfoil from my cold, lifeless head.
|

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
218
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 16:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:I also read that EA lied about their figures like they did with warhammer online. It seem that the 2 million sold copies were to retail and the 1.7 million subs was at end of December and that the only real data provided by EA as to how many play the game is that "Most" people still play 
I doubt that they lied, not only where those figures externally verified lying in official stockholder finical reports is punished by prosecution. So during the time period those statistics refer to they are completely accurate. |

Saul Shardani
Red Core Paradigm Shift Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 16:09:00 -
[6] - Quote
I really wish they had handled Warhammer Online better, I used to love that game  |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
1820
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 16:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kattshiro wrote:Why do you care so much if a game succeeds or doesnt if you dont play it? Also aren't you the guy that lauded it before it's release, and people proclaimed that it wasn't anything new or special rather new with a star wars twist, and voice acting? You then fervently disagreed and told us how wrong we were? Read last week that sales figures put it at 1.5 millionish. Didnt say active subs, but given that many bought the what? 200 dollar uber peuter box set, and regular 60 price tag. I dunno if i'd call that a total failure. (sales figures are reported by retailers). http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/02/01/ea-reveals-swtor-subscription-and-sales-numbers-beats-financial/Kinda funny that many want to see other games fail... MMO wise or we put so much stock in subscription numbers rise and fall. It's also funny that numbers are relative to the specific game so EVE = 300kish == success. (8years) (I dont disagree) AOC 150ksih a few years == total failure. Rift 500kish started out with 1 millionish == semi failure. What would be interesting is to see how many total have subbed for eve over it's life time v. the number of subscribers now. People make such a big deal over initial sales volume v. current subs. I would argue this is very normal as many are just trying it out or move on to other things. Much is the same of single player games or instanced MMO's (FPS) most people dont just stick around with 1 until its end of days. Many MMO players only seem to play 1 game and one game only (I dont understand this or do this, but whatever) So their belief is because of this a game == failure. But really what defines failure in an MMO? I'd say if it's still running and earning money even if it has a low player base.
I do agree that the OP is making too much out of the figures and server stats. The game is still hugely popular and will likely stay that way for some time no matter what happens. EA and BW will make their initial investment back very soon and it's all profit from that point on. The game is only a failure in the sense, that it's a disapointment from many MMO veterans point of view and that it won't likely be able to dethrone WoW. It's some people's belief, that they didn't invest hundreds of millions in to the game to finish second to WoW, so if it doesn't keep gaining subs at a steady pace and overtake WoW at some point, it could be viewed as a failure in that sense too.
I think the reason for caring is part schadenfreude and part caring about the trend of MMOs in general. SWTOR isn't anything special outside the single player campaign, it's a huge budget game to intentionally make a clone of the average MMO, give it a some polish and simplify the gameplay and move things more towards single player games in general. I care because that kind of philosophy in making MMOs is horrible IMO and I don't want to see it becoming a trend in the industry.
How popular it will end up being is sort of a mystery at this point though, since unlike most MMOs SWTOR is very leveling focused and had a good amount of initial content. Basicly meaning the initial impression is very positive leading to renewed subscriptions, while the main problem areas with the game only start at the endgame and it will take a long time before the casual mass of players reaches that point let alone gets bored of repeating it. Those problems being, ignoring bugs, that it doesn't offer anything new compared to other MMOs(except hutball) and in many areas it currently does the same content worse than the competition. Since it is star wars and ignoring individual player taste not a horrible game, it will likely retain hundreds of thousands of players even in the worst case scenario, but depending on how bioware develops the game it could even remain as the second most popular MMO in the west after WoW.
|

Fuee
Cupcake Catapults
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 16:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
SWTOR cost 300+ million to make |

Valei Khurelem
288
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 16:13:00 -
[9] - Quote
Fuee wrote:SWTOR cost 300+ million to make
Are you ******* kidding me?
Oh wait, must have been all those stupid cinematic videos they put up to hype everything.
"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP." -á - CCP Ytterbium |

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
37
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 16:31:00 -
[10] - Quote
Great, I left the Rift forums because their off topic section was loaded with these exact same **** threads and now I have to see it here.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/01/us-electronicarts-idUSTRE8102ED20120201
Looks like they are reporting the same. 2 mil copies sold, 1.7 accounts retained. That tells me that <1.7 million people are enjoying the game (taking into account multiple account users), just as around 100k people are enjoying WAR and 70K are playing AOC.
Kattshiro asked a really good question, why do you care so much about this if you don't even play the game? Seriously, it's just a game, one of many. Don't like it, try something else. |

Gavin DeVries
JDI Industries
41
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 16:54:00 -
[11] - Quote
One thing worries me about that accounts retained number: I seem to recall reading that even though purchased copies of the game came with 30 days of play time, you had to sign up for a subscription to be able to USE the full 30 days; they wouldn't let you keep playing past a certain point without the subscription already locked in. Did they change their minds because of outcry? Or is there the possibility that they're quoting numbers that are going to drastically drop as people unsubscribe as soon as the free 30 days are over? PVP is a question with no single right answer, but a lot of wrong ones. |

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
37
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 17:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
Gavin DeVries wrote:One thing worries me about that accounts retained number: I seem to recall reading that even though purchased copies of the game came with 30 days of play time, you had to sign up for a subscription to be able to USE the full 30 days; they wouldn't let you keep playing past a certain point without the subscription already locked in. Did they change their minds because of outcry? Or is there the possibility that they're quoting numbers that are going to drastically drop as people unsubscribe as soon as the free 30 days are over?
The 30 days has come and gone my friend. We're coming up on the 3 month mark when we usually see another natural drop in subscriptions. We'll see it again at 6 months.
But to answer your question, DAOC used this same method as well but all you have to do is sub up to start the game time then immediately unsub. No money lost. And no, EA was not hiding the cancel subscription button. |

Myxx
Atropos Group
494
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 18:14:00 -
[13] - Quote
Lyrka Bloodberry wrote:Ehm, the European Servers are all at standard population at 5 pm, so before primetime. That is not really bad... Of course the servers were full in the first month after release, because... well... it was the first month.
I think you are pretty much overinterpreting. ^ haters gonna hate, etc etc. Also, last night, US primetime, the US servers were all at heavy and standard load. not a single light population server. A couple were full. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 22:53:00 -
[14] - Quote
Kattshiro wrote:Why do you care so much if a game succeeds or doesnt if you dont play it? Also aren't you the guy that lauded it before it's release, and people proclaimed that it wasn't anything new or special rather new with a star wars twist, and voice acting? You then fervently disagreed and told us how wrong we were? Read last week that sales figures put it at 1.5 millionish. Didnt say active subs, but given that many bought the what? 200 dollar uber peuter box set, and regular 60 price tag. I dunno if i'd call that a total failure. (sales figures are reported by retailers). http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/02/01/ea-reveals-swtor-subscription-and-sales-numbers-beats-financial/Kinda funny that many want to see other games fail... MMO wise or we put so much stock in subscription numbers rise and fall. It's also funny that numbers are relative to the specific game so EVE = 300kish == success. (8years) (I dont disagree) AOC 150ksih a few years == total failure. Rift 500kish started out with 1 millionish == semi failure. What would be interesting is to see how many total have subbed for eve over it's life time v. the number of subscribers now. People make such a big deal over initial sales volume v. current subs. I would argue this is very normal as many are just trying it out or move on to other things. Much is the same of single player games or instanced MMO's (FPS) most people dont just stick around with 1 until its end of days. Many MMO players only seem to play 1 game and one game only (I dont understand this or do this, but whatever) So their belief is because of this a game == failure. But really what defines failure in an MMO? I'd say if it's still running and earning money even if it has a low player base.
Ehm no I am not that guy, I am the guy that bought it without saying anything and then made a thread afterwards about how much I regretted it and expressed a worry about the MMORPG industry.
Also that article is what I addressed in my OP, about how EA spins PR when infact the game has failed.
Also you ask why I want it to fail? Well, I do want it to fail, not when I bought it but after playing and quitting the game, why you ask? Because the game was a a big finger in the face of gamers and and even an insults. Hopefully it will teach the industry that we consumers are not some idiots who deserve to get screwed over by false advertising and lies to sell us crap.
Mind you, this is the second time they do with MMORPG's, not to mention other EA titles and even Bioware now.
EvE is a success because of the simple fact of how much they invested compared to return. EA invested 300 million dollars by some estimates upwards 500 million by the summer.
Anyway, I regretted my purchase and I made a thread about that before already, this thread I made because I find it to be funny, especially because of the Bidrones. The dumbest group of fanboys I have ever come across in life.
Comments by them like "EvE Online is dead now, swtor killed all competition swtor nr1 yeah EA said so!!" is funny  |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 22:54:00 -
[15] - Quote
Lyrka Bloodberry wrote:Ehm, the European Servers are all at standard population at 5 pm, so before primetime. That is not really bad... Of course the servers were full in the first month after release, because... well... it was the first month.
I think you are pretty much overinterpreting.
If you think these server numbers = 1.7 million and growing
Obviously it is the reverse.
Also isn't max server size 3000? |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
396
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 22:55:00 -
[16] - Quote
Valei Khurelem wrote:Fuee wrote:SWTOR cost 300+ million to make Are you ******* kidding me? Oh wait, must have been all those stupid cinematic videos they put up to hype everything.
MMO's can take 5 years to make and go through basic testing. assuming they have 300 people working on the project getting 50k a year 300 x 50 x 5 that right there is 75million, i'm sure most people got paid more then that.
i'm sure EA or lucas arts or god knows who wants a cut.
advertising cost a lot
servers. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 22:59:00 -
[17] - Quote
Myxx wrote:Lyrka Bloodberry wrote:Ehm, the European Servers are all at standard population at 5 pm, so before primetime. That is not really bad... Of course the servers were full in the first month after release, because... well... it was the first month.
I think you are pretty much overinterpreting. ^ haters gonna hate, etc etc. Also, last night, US primetime, the US servers were all at heavy and standard load. not a single light population server. A couple were full.
That is simply not true at all, I know since I checked and at 2am eastern they were all light in both US and EU.
By the way, "haters gonna hate" is the most common phrase used by Biodrones on the internet, that and WoW had problems at launch 2004
Not saying you are one but
Feel free to check xFire if you want server stats. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 23:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:Great, I left the Rift forums because their off topic section was loaded with these exact same **** threads and now I have to see it here. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/01/us-electronicarts-idUSTRE8102ED20120201Looks like they are reporting the same. 2 mil copies sold, 1.7 accounts retained. That tells me that <1.7 million people are enjoying the game (taking into account multiple account users), just as around 100k people are enjoying WAR and 70K are playing AOC. Kattshiro asked a really good question, why do you care so much about this if you don't even play the game? Seriously, it's just a game, one of many. Don't like it, try something else. Quote:SWTOR cost 300+ million to make I like how this number keeps going up each time I see it.
Those numbers are wrong since you misunderstand them. EA besides Origin is NOT retail, they said that they sold 2 million copies including on Origin and had 1.7 million subs by end of December. Then they said they have currently "MOST" of them still subscribing, or do you think 300,000 copies were bought but those people decided to not use the free month and just throw the game in a bin?
If you don't believe me check previous EA results and how their numbers and most companies sales numbers work, they count sales to RETAIL, that is how the industry works, same for those Nintendo Wii figures etc.
PS: If this thread really bothers you and you don't like it then don't click it |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 23:07:00 -
[19] - Quote
Herping yourDerp wrote:Valei Khurelem wrote:Fuee wrote:SWTOR cost 300+ million to make Are you ******* kidding me? Oh wait, must have been all those stupid cinematic videos they put up to hype everything. MMO's can take 5 years to make and go through basic testing. assuming they have 300 people working on the project getting 50k a year 300 x 50 x 5 that right there is 75million, i'm sure most people got paid more then that. i'm sure EA or lucas arts or god knows who wants a cut. advertising cost a lot servers.
They spent 7 years and created 2 studios (while having original Bioware and Mythic also work on it) and a service center on top of the trailers, marketing, George Lucas license which is 35% on everything for life and voice overs etc. They however forgot to make a working and good game. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 23:15:00 -
[20] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:Gavin DeVries wrote:One thing worries me about that accounts retained number: I seem to recall reading that even though purchased copies of the game came with 30 days of play time, you had to sign up for a subscription to be able to USE the full 30 days; they wouldn't let you keep playing past a certain point without the subscription already locked in. Did they change their minds because of outcry? Or is there the possibility that they're quoting numbers that are going to drastically drop as people unsubscribe as soon as the free 30 days are over? The 30 days has come and gone my friend. We're coming up on the 3 month mark when we usually see another natural drop in subscriptions. We'll see it again at 6 months. But to answer your question, DAOC used this same method as well but all you have to do is sub up to start the game time then immediately unsub. No money lost. And no, EA was not hiding the cancel subscription button.
EA did say it includes free month when they mentioned 1.7 since they stated those figures for 31 of December, just read original conference call to investors. Also I am sure they did not hide it intentionally but it did happen and it happened just before month ended and it was kinda funny lol
Some people mistake the 1.7 million subs to mean as of today, what he said was currently "MOST". He used the word "most" and from that people think it means 1.7 million today. Also their retail figures after December is like 10,000 copies a week, to retail. EA also used them same PR spin on numbers for Warhammer Online after 5 weeks, I guess people just assume EA are honest now, I know I made the mistake buying the game, wont happen again. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 23:21:00 -
[21] - Quote
EA needs 500k subs for a year I believe at least to make up the initial investment or so they said before release if I remember right, I do not believe they even have 500,000 after a month, also that does not save the fact they have spent 7 years of lost studio time for 3studio one created just for this game and one service center in Ireland etc just for this game. Also They owe George Lucas 35% of everything they ever make of the Star Wars name, ouch. Also they lost consumer trust, I know I will never buy EA titles or Bioware titles again and I also know I am not the only one, sure maybe we are few but that is still something and guess what, whenever EA make another MMORPG, who will even try it out.
Anyway, I think it is funny and also sweet that they fail and I don't care if someone somehow is bothered by me taking pleasure in them failing. They owe me after my wasted 70 EURO.
Also, Biodrones are fun to make fun of I can't remember the last time I had so many great laughs on forums. |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
219
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 23:24:00 -
[22] - Quote
If you open identical page in two tabs in a browser you can copy and paste between them, that way you can consolidate the text and enter bbcode manually. This allows somebody to quote several people in a single post.
Much tidier than quadruple posting. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 23:28:00 -
[23] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:If you open identical page in two tabs in a browser you can copy and paste between them, that way you can consolidate the text and enter bbcode manually. This allows somebody to quote several people in a single post.
Much tidier than quadruple posting.
Thanks, I am used to Lazy SWToR Forums, sorry holy ****, search button!!
But yeah, will try next time. |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released 0ccupational Hazzard
449
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 23:43:00 -
[24] - Quote
I am wondering if the marketing people at EA did not grossly underestimate the saturation in this market, especially the theme parks that dominates the genre. I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 23:57:00 -
[25] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:I am wondering if the marketing people at EA did not grossly underestimate the saturation in this market, especially the theme parks that dominates the genre.
http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/40196/EA_CFO_Eric_Brown_resigns.php
Obviously.
Also I think they overestimated the Star Wars franchise and that it would make every SW fan boy out there buy it just because it has that IP. Which by the way, is most likely the most expensive IP you can go for.
Honestly, this is how it feels when they decided to make the game-
KOTOR=Bioware RPG+Star Wars=Game of the year and millions of sold copies.
WoW a MMORPG=loads of cash mmm
KOTOR+WOW=ULTIMATE POWAAAH
Oh and Activision Blizzard it seems will soon win their lawsuit against EA for industrial espionage on WoW. Which is funny because they obviously failed to even make a good WoW clone.
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2011/12/22/court-says-activision-can-go-ahead-with-lawsuit-against-ea.aspx
They are suing for 400 Million USD and from what I read it seems they are likely to win, so SWToR will end up costing at least 700 Million USD?
So I hear a few people who go to see the Star Wars episode 1 in 3D will be treated to an add for SWToR, not of actual gameplay of course but the anime cgi trailer. I wonder how much they paid George Lucas for that tie in promo add. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 00:07:00 -
[26] - Quote
The other problem they made was making an MMORPG with a worse story than KOTOR 1 & 2 ending at level 50. Most people like myself finished the game before our free month was up. Fully voice over quests to kill 30 sand people was not so much fun after all.
http://beta.xfire.com/games/swtor
EvE Online
http://beta.xfire.com/games/eve
WoW
http://beta.xfire.com/games/wow
Nr 1 is LoL of course.
Also interesting article on future of subscription models.
http://www.shacknews.com/article/71199/soe-dc-universe-daily-revenue-up-700-percent-since-going
Another interesting article by the HeroEngine developers who made the game engine used for SWToR,.
http://www.heroengine.com/2011/11/heroengine-meets-starwars/
In the year 2005 at E3 EA approaches the developers of HeroEngine-
GÇ£I need this,GÇ¥ said Gordon. GÇ£I am about to start a special project and these tools will let us build and prototype fast and get something running in a hurry.GÇ¥ Gordon is not an excitable guy by nature but this had his adrenaline flowing. GÇ£This is just what I need! I want to license your engine.GÇ¥
GÇ£ItGÇÖs not productized yet,GÇ¥ we told Gordon. GÇ£There are whole sections of code that is only roughed in and not optimized for performance or security. And there are very few comments and very little documentation.GÇ¥
He didnGÇÖt care. GÇ£We are going to have tons of engineers. We can finish it ourselves. WeGÇÖre going to want to modify your source code for our special project anyway.GÇ¥
Read the full article at the link above. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:06:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:2bhammered wrote:I also read that EA lied about their figures like they did with warhammer online. It seem that the 2 million sold copies were to retail and the 1.7 million subs was at end of December and that the only real data provided by EA as to how many play the game is that "Most" people still play  I doubt that they lied, not only where those figures externally verified lying in official stockholder finical reports is punished by prosecution. So during the time period those statistics refer to they are completely accurate.
They did not lie, you just did not comprehend their meaning and you also read it out of context. Also the use of the word "MOST" is not something you can prosecute someone over especially when "MOST" are on their free subscription. People like myself make millions of reading between the lines and knowing how things work not to mention read it all in context. Nope they did not lie, nor did the reuters and other media.
Here is how you SHOULD read it, 2 million sales to retail,1.7 million subscriptions including free month as of december 31, currently "most" are still subscribed as of...
You're welcome, oh and they did the same with Warhammer Online and other titles as have others in the industry. Well except Blizzard who at the same time released exact figure of number of subscribers, I wonder why they use numbers and not words like "Most".
 |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 02:00:00 -
[28] - Quote
http://www.swtor.com/community/showthread.php?t=288275
Pure gold, mmm, I recommend you bring popcorn lol |

Liam Mirren
250
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 05:23:00 -
[29] - Quote
This IS a discussion forum, not just "lets spam my own thread" :P
Also, we get it: you don't like it (neither do I), lets leave it at that. Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.
My guides: http://mirren.freeforums.org |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 05:55:00 -
[30] - Quote
Liam Mirren wrote:This IS a discussion forum, not just "lets spam my own thread" :P
Also, we get it: you don't like it (neither do I), lets leave it at that.
Yes it is a forum and I made a thread about the fact that SWToR has failed and is dying, no I am not going to "leave it at that", because I enjoy it. If you don't then you are excused from this thread which has a clear title so as to avoid confusion about the subject 
Here is another funny video 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68VfgesWmcI
Enjoy!
Besides, being funny, it is the biggest failure of a game in history of the video gaming industry, sounds thread worthy to me  |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
1833
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 07:33:00 -
[31] - Quote
It's potentially the biggest failure in the industry. If it really takes them 500k subs for a full year to even make a profit from this, there is a real chance that you're right in the end, but I still think they'll make a profit out of this in the long run. I just don't see most MMO veterans having a constant sub for long. A few months sure and then coming back during expansions to play through the new content during the free month. That doesn't equate to failure, just to having to rely on other players to carry the game.
Keep in mind, that it has one of the strongest IP with fanatical fans who genuinely love everything with a SW theme(FFS they'll even defend the prequels to death and see nothing wrong with them) and it has also attracted new MMO players, who don't know any better or really like the single player story aspects. They might stay with the game and if BW can churn out new content for them at a steady pace, they alone could carry the game for a long time. Either way I just think it's too early to tell, since the raging is currently mostly from MMO vets and I'll wait until I see how things look at the 3 month and 6 month marks before announcing it dead or having a bright long term future. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 08:50:00 -
[32] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote: *snip, sorry needed more "characters"  .
I agree with most of what you say, except I believe it already did fail and I am sure that will be confirmed this month when they are suppose to have next conference and are suppose to give detailed numbers of how many people have a paid subscription.
I think the game was doomed to fail from day 1 back in 2005, it never had a chance. My reason is because back in 2005 WoW was declared to be the top selling PC game of all time. Later that year on E3 this happened-
http://www.heroengine.com/2011/11/heroengine-meets-starwars/
In the year 2005 at E3 EA approaches the developers of HeroEngine-
GÇ£I need this,GÇ¥ said Gordon. GÇ£I am about to start a special project and these tools will let us build and prototype fast and get something running in a hurry.GÇ¥ Gordon is not an excitable guy by nature but this had his adrenaline flowing. GÇ£This is just what I need! I want to license your engine.GÇ¥
GÇ£ItGÇÖs not productized yet,GÇ¥ we told Gordon. GÇ£There are whole sections of code that is only roughed in and not optimized for performance or security. And there are very few comments and very little documentation.GÇ¥
He didnGÇÖt care. GÇ£We are going to have tons of engineers. We can finish it ourselves. WeGÇÖre going to want to modify your source code for our special project anyway.GÇ¥
Read the full article at the link above.
This is just one thing of many that stands out but it illustrates my point the best. They never cared, they never cared about making a great game, they just wanted something fast to capitalize on WoWs success and get a piece of the pie. Now if you remember at the same time SWG another Star Wars license MMO existed and was failing hard and Lucas Arts were very displeased with Sony Online Entertainment, which is why later they tried to emulate WoW with the NGE making the game level based etc. So Bioware had a title already called, KOTOR, it was game of the year when it released with millions of copies sold, it seemed natural then to partner up for an MMORPG. Kill SWG and use the successful KOTOR.
But reading that and other sources and if you look at how their development of the game has progressed since 2005,it is obvious they wanted to make a Star Wars MMO and release it within a few years. But because of problems and Warhammer Online etc not to mention SOE it ended up taking 7 years to finish. After the success of Mass Effect they then decided to add that system into SWToR, so then they ended up having to borrow their studio time. I could go on and on but...
Point is, they wanted something fast on the market to grab a piece of the WoW action. It ended up taking a lot longer and costing much more money than they bargained for. In many ways it is a very similar story to that of Duke Nukem Forever and how that was handled. I mean, their game engine is dx9 and does not go higher, in 2012, brand new state of the art home computers run the game at 5-20 fps while a computer 5 years old manage at 60 fps.
As for die hard fans, they are very few and I'll tell you why, most hardcore Star Wars fans that would be potential consumers already played SWG with the NGE and they numbered at 10,000 people. Also a lot of the SWG fans both pre NGE and after are for obvious reasons not happy with this Star Wars MMO, it is too much of a theme park and not a sandbox not to mention they were used to far more features in their game.
Also, just as with me and other people who love and loved Star Wars we hated the prequel movies, nr1 fan is Mr Pinkett at redlettermedia or whatever he and his company is called that made the world famous Star Wars prequels reviews http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI That is why he made the videos and spent and still spends so much time hating them. People like that and me we quit SWToR and hate Lucas Arts even more (it is like George Lucas wrote the script and dialogue in SWToR )
Then you have the MMORPG players and gamers who will leave because the game simply suck.
Will there be many people still playing it? Die hard fans? Yes! But they wont be enough and they will all quit sooner or later or when they are forced to quit, like the last thousand players in SWG last year. Most Star Wars fans will move on to other Star Wars games, like SW Kinect where you can wave a light-saber infront of your TV.
Others will go back to WoW, EvE Online, FF11, EQ, STO etc and others will go to Guild Wars 2, Tera, Diablo 3, DOTA 2 or the other MMO's announced or any of the F2P games like League of Legends that just keeps growing and has far passed WoW.
SWToR costs money, Tera is the only other game this year after SWToR with a monthly subscription model. SWToR would have made it back in 2005-2008 which is what they planned to do, tough luck, industry has changed, people are bored of WoW and WoW clones (SWToR is a WoWclone) and WoW will most likely be the last game with a subscription model that does good, they said their new MMO TITAN wont be monthly sub, Planeside 2 and SOE games will all be some form of F2P etc but it is their fault and now they deserve to fail for their greed and bad product |

Valei Khurelem
294
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 10:08:00 -
[33] - Quote
Herping yourDerp wrote:Valei Khurelem wrote:Fuee wrote:SWTOR cost 300+ million to make Are you ******* kidding me? Oh wait, must have been all those stupid cinematic videos they put up to hype everything. MMO's can take 5 years to make and go through basic testing. assuming they have 300 people working on the project getting 50k a year 300 x 50 x 5 that right there is 75million, i'm sure most people got paid more then that. i'm sure EA or lucas arts or god knows who wants a cut. advertising cost a lot servers.
Oh yeah, the amount of people involved in that daft project was probably ridiculous ( and possibly a reason why it's failing ) one thing a lot of people just don't understand though is how much time you have to put into those cinematic trailers to make them look as good as they do. It honestly takes a good number of months because of all the detail, if they had spent that much time and resources working on the game it might have MIGHT have been better but unfortunately it seems these days stupid cinematic trailers lure gullible people in more than a solid product do.
CCP are equally as guilty on this, I think their crucible trailer was the only honest trailer I've seen from them so far because it was just gameplay footage and nothing else.
"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP." -á - CCP Ytterbium |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 10:45:00 -
[34] - Quote
Valei Khurelem wrote:Herping yourDerp wrote:Valei Khurelem wrote:Fuee wrote:SWTOR cost 300+ million to make Are you ******* kidding me? Oh wait, must have been all those stupid cinematic videos they put up to hype everything. MMO's can take 5 years to make and go through basic testing. assuming they have 300 people working on the project getting 50k a year 300 x 50 x 5 that right there is 75million, i'm sure most people got paid more then that. i'm sure EA or lucas arts or god knows who wants a cut. advertising cost a lot servers. Oh yeah, the amount of people involved in that daft project was probably ridiculous ( and possibly a reason why it's failing ) one thing a lot of people just don't understand though is how much time you have to put into those cinematic trailers to make them look as good as they do. It honestly takes a good number of months because of all the detail, if they had spent that much time and resources working on the game it might have MIGHT have been better but unfortunately it seems these days stupid cinematic trailers lure gullible people in more than a solid product do. CCP are equally as guilty on this, I think their crucible trailer was the only honest trailer I've seen from them so far because it was just gameplay footage and nothing else.
Skyrim=3 years + 60 million dollars in total including all advertising, return 450 million dollars in 3 days and now is up to 650+ million, no recurring costs for license or servers (I am sure there are other fees in future of course but minimal.) This is official numbers of profit they made.
SWToR=7 years + 300 million, some say 500 million with advertising, return 120 million after a month?-35% license fee -server costs -support - new development studio -offices in Ireland -taxes etc. I had to guess.
When you think about it, it is most likely 500 million USD and not 300 million. It also makes you wonder how much sales you need to make a return, 2 million is not enough, so how many subs? Hmm, 15 dollars a month -charges, taxes, LA license hmm, oh oh 
WoW back in the day I think had a total of 60 million invested when they released their game, within a year it was all time best selling PC game. Of course like Bethesda they made their own engine and everything in-house.
I welcome an expert to try and figure out how many subs SWToR needs to break even, someone with far better math skills than I. |

Valei Khurelem
295
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 10:59:00 -
[35] - Quote
We'll only be able to know about whether they've actually made money off The Old Republic until they release their profits at the end of the year, since EA is a public corporation they have to answer to shareholders, they have been consistently losing money each year and I reckon it's partially because they spent so much money trying to take down their competition ( Buying out people like Westwood, Bioware etc. ) and because no one in that companies management I think really knows properly how to make games they're having a lot of difficulty.
They're boasting the numbers now because they're big and impressive but just wait for the next few months to pass and we'll all see how well The Old Republic is really doing.
"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP." -á - CCP Ytterbium |

Fuee
Cupcake Catapults
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 12:33:00 -
[36] - Quote
I was waiting on this game on and off for at least 2 or so years. I was thinking it was to be more like a sandbox SWG 2 , I had pre-ordered it in November but luckily cancelled when I read more about their focus on the "story" and that it was to be like WoW.
The one good thing these Star Wars games have provided is a metric crap-ton of drama, from the developer behind the SWG NGE's suicide, the SWG forum archives as a whole to now the most costly release ever and losses at least in profit potential if not in outright negative balance sheets.
When I cancelled my pre-order a few months ago I went back and read the old forums, news about the SWG disaster. Though the old SWG forums were replaced some time ago the archives still exist somewhere out there. They're pretty hilarious.
(and.. I'm not laughing at the developer's suicide.) |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 16:13:00 -
[37] - Quote
Fuee wrote: snip* I needed characters  sorry 
I loved SWG until the NGE hit, I had a dark jedi on bria so it really hurt. Yes, SWToR was nothing like SWG and heck, it is even worse than WoW vanilla to me or WoW today. I had a hunch the game would fail for the reasons I came to see But I let myself get fooled, some friends said it was great, just like KOTOR and leveling is awesome hyperbole stuff, oh and they all also quit after me But I figure, how can they **** it up? Like I told myself when I went to see Star Wars the Phantom Menace, maybe it wont be as fun as SWG or whatever but surely it will be at least as good as WoW or something.
Boy was I wrong, not only was it not what I wanted, it is terrible and time will tell but I believe it will end up that this game is nothing no one ever wanted. Not even that most rabid fan-boy. It is an insult to gamers everywhere and the industry as a whole. I can't wait to see EA and Bioware lose their lawsuit on top of this game tanking. Yes I am "Laughing" at them as their game is sinking as we speak and I do take pleasure in it and I don't care if anyone has a problem with me enjoying it
I don't doubt for a second that this game will not only fail to break even with their investment but in fact gointo the negative as you put it. Unlike SOE who with SWG commited suicide (but don't forget Lucas Arts pressured them to show numbers equal to WoW and do anything to achieve that result,) Bioware and EA commited suicide before the game was even released.
The fact they released it in the state it is and will continue to be shows that they don't mind screwing every single person out there to try and save money, even if that person was or is a loyal consumer of theirs. They honestly do not give a crap, just read their forums, they broke the UI and now said that it is the players fault for not testing the changes on the PTR and giving them enough feedback to know that the UI is broken before going live with latest patch. Afterwards several people showed them threads posted on the PTR forums alerting the developers to the broken UI all ignored every single feedback and issue in beta, also ignored for 1 year since closed beta testing and worse.
I hope they burn, I mean it and as you can see and as I have pointed out in this thread it is clear that SWToR has already failed and now the question is how much it will hurt them.
One of my biggest concerns with this launch is the media, go read the EGM review online of the game, almost everyone have given the game 9 out of 10 before launch, biggest reviewer in Australia gave it 9.5/10 to a game that still does not have a release date in their country I have never witnessed another game in my life since the80's have this amount of biased reviews, read them I dare anyone to read them, IGN and others reviewing and giving top score, game of the year MMORPG for 2012 when it was released in 2011 based on a beta build... Yes we have all seen biased and bought and bribed reviews and reviewers before but this is on a whole different level.
I have read 4 reviews by leading game sites with obvious copy and paste articles without anyone calling them out, if someone does threads are deleted, accounts banned Biodrones trolling and attacking and making outright lies to people who have not played the game making up bullshit. I see posts everyday by these people saying EVE sucks and failed and SWToR is beating WoW in subscriptions and even worse, without anyone calling them out and if they do they get banned.
I have seen youtube video bloggers making a small critique about the game and get 1000 comments calling him names, everyday.
EA must have bribed so many people it is not funny, I even see it on Neogaf, known as the most respected forum for video game industry in the world banning people left and right for saying anything bad about SWToR. Not troll posts screaming burn burn EA, but posts explaining how it is bad game design with thought put into it.
I am not joking when I say, I have never seen a worse community or worse media manipulation in my life of gaming. Microsoft and Sony console war is not even 1/100th as bad as this, not even the MW3 vs BF3 came close by a long-shot. MMORPG.com reviewer already got fired for giving the game a score of 6.7, they hired another one who gave it game of the year instead shortly after. When that happened a few years ago with gamespot reviewer it made headlines across the gaming world, this time not a blip* He is not the only one either, gamepro made a video, available on youtube being negative before launch, now they don't have a voice on metacritic anymore. G4 TV gave the game 100 out of 100, highest game score in history, they claimed it to be the best game ever made. PC Gamer, 93, game of the year, on their top 20 list of best games in history.
No, something is very wrong with the gaming industry and the best thing about SWToR failing and hopefully killing Bioware and hurting EA is, people will question the gaming media and forums and blogs and hopefully change things around or the very least, make headlines again.
Wanna know something funny? threads like mine even if just with info and not statements that SWToR already failed, are against the rules on mmorpg.com, mmo-champion.com and dozen of other forums, only one who seems to allow it is their competition forums, as in WoW, EVE and RIFT etc. All other communities even gamefaqs and youtube run into moderation. I have even seen tortanic videos removed by youtube.
Again, I hope they burn! |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
220
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 17:32:00 -
[38] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Jhagiti Tyran wrote:2bhammered wrote:I also read that EA lied about their figures like they did with warhammer online. It seem that the 2 million sold copies were to retail and the 1.7 million subs was at end of December and that the only real data provided by EA as to how many play the game is that "Most" people still play  I doubt that they lied, not only where those figures externally verified lying in official stockholder finical reports is punished by prosecution. So during the time period those statistics refer to they are completely accurate. They did not lie, you just did not comprehend their meaning and you also read it out of context. Also the use of the word "MOST" is not something you can prosecute someone over especially when "MOST" are on their free subscription. People like myself make millions of reading between the lines and knowing how things work not to mention read it all in context. Nope they did not lie, nor did the reuters and other media. Here is how you SHOULD read it, 2 million sales to retail,1.7 million subscriptions including free month as of december 31, currently "most" are still subscribed as of... You're welcome, oh and they did the same with Warhammer Online and other titles as have others in the industry. Well except Blizzard who at the same time released exact figure of number of subscribers, I wonder why they use numbers and not words like "Most". 
The problem is noone seems to have bothered to check the financial statements themselves, that would answer the question once and for all. Income from the sales of the game (and thus the 30 days) and the income from subscription fees would have to be listed separately.
Wading through all the verbiage in the reports isn't something I can be bothered with because I don't care about how many people are playing SWToR. Anyone who cares enough though should really do it though because it will end the speculation.
Of course it seems more about trolling and smacking a game that people individually dislike than any real discussion about how well the game is doing. |

Fuee
Cupcake Catapults
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 17:38:00 -
[39] - Quote
The top 4 threads on SWToR forum
http://i.imgur.com/DIIFp.png
So much entertainment value. I almost wish they had tricked me so I could participate  |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 17:42:00 -
[40] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:2bhammered wrote:Jhagiti Tyran wrote:2bhammered wrote:I also read that EA lied about their figures like they did with warhammer online. It seem that the 2 million sold copies were to retail and the 1.7 million subs was at end of December and that the only real data provided by EA as to how many play the game is that "Most" people still play  I doubt that they lied, not only where those figures externally verified lying in official stockholder finical reports is punished by prosecution. So during the time period those statistics refer to they are completely accurate. They did not lie, you just did not comprehend their meaning and you also read it out of context. Also the use of the word "MOST" is not something you can prosecute someone over especially when "MOST" are on their free subscription. People like myself make millions of reading between the lines and knowing how things work not to mention read it all in context. Nope they did not lie, nor did the reuters and other media. Here is how you SHOULD read it, 2 million sales to retail,1.7 million subscriptions including free month as of december 31, currently "most" are still subscribed as of... You're welcome, oh and they did the same with Warhammer Online and other titles as have others in the industry. Well except Blizzard who at the same time released exact figure of number of subscribers, I wonder why they use numbers and not words like "Most".  The problem is noone seems to have bothered to check the financial statements themselves, that would answer the question once and for all. Income from the sales of the game (and thus the 30 days) and the income from subscription fees would have to be listed separately. Wading through all the verbiage in the reports isn't something I can be bothered with because I don't care about how many people are playing SWToR. Anyone who cares enough though should really do it though because it will end the speculation. Of course it seems more about trolling and smacking a game that people individually dislike than any real discussion about how well the game is doing.
No that is not how it works, how it works is a publisher sends copies of software to retail free and months later retailers pay for it. EA can see how many started a subscription, they said, and yes I did look into it but thanks for the insult? 1.7 million people that includes free subscriptions. They are suppose to give an exact figure other than "most" this month at the next conference as I already stated in this thread.
Now you can't be bothered wading through reports, fine, but there is only 1 report and 1 conference call with investors to wade through so whatever, I guess that is too much for you.
Of course it seems to be more about you trolling this thread then discuss anything because you all you have done so far in here is? Right!
Want real discussion? Look at my posts in this thread, now come back and tell me I did not post anything "real" here.
Peace! |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 17:45:00 -
[41] - Quote
Fuee wrote:The top 4 threads on SWToR forum http://i.imgur.com/DIIFp.pngSo much entertainment value. I almost wish they had tricked me so I could participate 
they are even more fun once you read them, what I hate the most though is those Biodrones talking **** about EvE online instead of playing their game, oh that's right, they ain't playing their game |

Kattshiro
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 17:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
Valei Khurelem wrote:Herping yourDerp wrote:Valei Khurelem wrote:Fuee wrote:SWTOR cost 300+ million to make Are you ******* kidding me? Oh wait, must have been all those stupid cinematic videos they put up to hype everything. MMO's can take 5 years to make and go through basic testing. assuming they have 300 people working on the project getting 50k a year 300 x 50 x 5 that right there is 75million, i'm sure most people got paid more then that. i'm sure EA or lucas arts or god knows who wants a cut. advertising cost a lot servers. Oh yeah, the amount of people involved in that daft project was probably ridiculous ( and possibly a reason why it's failing ) one thing a lot of people just don't understand though is how much time you have to put into those cinematic trailers to make them look as good as they do. It honestly takes a good number of months because of all the detail, if they had spent that much time and resources working on the game it might have MIGHT have been better but unfortunately it seems these days stupid cinematic trailers lure gullible people in more than a solid product do. CCP are equally as guilty on this, I think their crucible trailer was the only honest trailer I've seen from them so far because it was just gameplay footage and nothing else.
You know companies now all (maybe not blizzard im not sure dont quote me) hire someone else to make the videos/cinematics right?
As for the they didnt do anything new argument... They never said they were going to. (Which is why the consumer does in fact need to do their own research prior to buying a product.) And im not sure every game that comes out needs to be a revolution. I do agree 3rd person MMO's are kinda "****** out" in terms of gameplay and mechanics. But really it seems enough people dont honestly mind and are rather happy with iteration instead of revolution. Fact of the matter is revolution is a rarity.
I dont think it's a failure rather not a game made with you and I in mind. Only difference is i read previews ahead of time to know not to buy it, and didnt have the OMG STAR WARS!!! moment that clouded my judgement. However I did have that with warhammer so i'm not proclaiming im better than you or smarter...rather just had the experience sooner.
This is why im skeptical of GW2 and its promises. (Though there is no sub for it) but I expect iteration once again rather than OMG the MMO SAVIORS! |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
220
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 18:03:00 -
[43] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Want real discussion? Look at my posts in this thread, now come back and tell me I did not post anything "real" here.
Peace!
Your opinions and speculation on what the numbers mean isnt "real" in the sense that its just subjective. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 18:07:00 -
[44] - Quote
Kattshiro wrote:Valei Khurelem wrote:Herping yourDerp wrote:Valei Khurelem wrote:Fuee wrote:SWTOR cost 300+ million to make Are you ******* kidding me? Oh wait, must have been all those stupid cinematic videos they put up to hype everything. MMO's can take 5 years to make and go through basic testing. assuming they have 300 people working on the project getting 50k a year 300 x 50 x 5 that right there is 75million, i'm sure most people got paid more then that. i'm sure EA or lucas arts or god knows who wants a cut. advertising cost a lot servers. Oh yeah, the amount of people involved in that daft project was probably ridiculous ( and possibly a reason why it's failing ) one thing a lot of people just don't understand though is how much time you have to put into those cinematic trailers to make them look as good as they do. It honestly takes a good number of months because of all the detail, if they had spent that much time and resources working on the game it might have MIGHT have been better but unfortunately it seems these days stupid cinematic trailers lure gullible people in more than a solid product do. CCP are equally as guilty on this, I think their crucible trailer was the only honest trailer I've seen from them so far because it was just gameplay footage and nothing else. You know companies now all (maybe not blizzard im not sure dont quote me) hire someone else to make the videos/cinematics right? As for the they didnt do anything new argument... They never said they were going to. (Which is why the consumer does in fact need to do their own research prior to buying a product.) And im not sure every game that comes out needs to be a revolution. I do agree 3rd person MMO's are kinda "****** out" in terms of gameplay and mechanics. But really it seems enough people dont honestly mind and are rather happy with iteration instead of revolution. Fact of the matter is revolution is a rarity. I dont think it's a failure rather not a game made with you and I in mind. Only difference is i read previews ahead of time to know not to buy it, and didnt have the OMG STAR WARS!!! moment that clouded my judgement. However I did have that with warhammer so i'm not proclaiming im better than you or smarter...rather just had the experience sooner. This is why im skeptical of GW2 and its promises. (Though there is no sub for it) but I expect iteration once again rather than OMG the MMO SAVIORS!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68VfgesWmcI
Before you say anything else, there are many, many more videos like it and you are free to read their website information, check their released trailers (which by the way uses highres textures not included in the real game etc.) Or listen to their interviews or Q&A at conventions etc with statements that were all false.
Also they lied during beta telling everyone that all submitted bug reports and issues have been addressed and at launch using latest build none of those problems would exist.
Of course I and others were a sucker, but they did pull every trick in the book to deceive people. Also Bioware use to carry quite a large amount of respect among gamers like myself. Obviously that has changed since DOA 2 and now SWToR.
GW2 I am not skeptical about as much even after this fiasco with EA and at least they don't charge monthly subscription. But if anything I have learned this, never ever trust gaming reviews, beta or whatever even if 90% of them all says game is 9/10+. Will rely on friends I know and trust as well as bloggers etc. who have the same taste as I and know wtf they are talking about.
As for the CGI anime trailers SWToR had made, they are above and beyond anything out there, with the exception of Blizzard I guess. You can tell they were not cheap. |

Fuee
Cupcake Catapults
9
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 18:08:00 -
[45] - Quote
Kattshiro wrote:
I dont think it's a failure rather not a game made with you and I in mind. Only difference is i read previews ahead of time to know not to buy it, and didnt have the OMG STAR WARS!!! moment that clouded my judgement. However I did have that with warhammer so i'm not proclaiming im better than you or smarter...rather just had the experience sooner.
This is why im skeptical of GW2 and its promises. (Though there is no sub for it) but I expect iteration once again rather than OMG the MMO SAVIORS!
The same thing happened to me with warhammer, hard. Never again!
|

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 18:09:00 -
[46] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:2bhammered wrote:Want real discussion? Look at my posts in this thread, now come back and tell me I did not post anything "real" here.
Peace! Your opinions and speculation on what the numbers mean isnt "real" in the sense that its just subjective.
And again that is all what you offer to this thread, contradiction. Have a good day sir!
Oh and the numbers are real for the record as are their meaning, you keep saying otherwise but you are wrong, plain and simple. |

Myxx
Atropos Group
494
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 18:43:00 -
[47] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Myxx wrote:Lyrka Bloodberry wrote:Ehm, the European Servers are all at standard population at 5 pm, so before primetime. That is not really bad... Of course the servers were full in the first month after release, because... well... it was the first month.
I think you are pretty much overinterpreting. ^ haters gonna hate, etc etc. Also, last night, US primetime, the US servers were all at heavy and standard load. not a single light population server. A couple were full. That is simply not true at all, I know since I checked and at 2am eastern they were all light in both US and EU. By the way, "haters gonna hate" is the most common phrase used by Biodrones on the internet, that and WoW had problems at launch 2004  Not saying you are one but  Feel free to check xFire if you want server stats.
I have put your problem in bold, underlined italics. 2 am est? I'm sleeping at that point as are most reasonable people, I imagine. US primetime check at like 7-9pm est, on a saturday. |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
219
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 19:12:00 -
[48] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Jhagiti Tyran wrote:2bhammered wrote:Want real discussion? Look at my posts in this thread, now come back and tell me I did not post anything "real" here.
Peace! Your opinions and speculation on what the numbers mean isnt "real" in the sense that its just subjective. And again that is all what you offer to this thread, contradiction. Have a good day sir! Oh and the numbers are real for the record as are their meaning, you keep saying otherwise but you are wrong, plain and simple.
Your reading comprehension needs some work, where in that post did I leave any contradiction? All I did was make it clear that a subjective opinion is something very different to a fact.
Obviously that didn't sink so let me try to make it clear with an example.
A fact would be,
Star Wars: The old Republic is a game.
A subjective opinion would be,
Star Wars: The old Republic is a good/bad game.
Now I have explained that lets go a little further. Listing the officially verified and published subscription figures is using a fact. Taking the officially verified and published subscription figures along with a very tightly sampled server population statistic and applying an analysis to them is subjective opinion.
|

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
44
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 19:16:00 -
[49] - Quote
Myxx wrote:2bhammered wrote:Myxx wrote:Lyrka Bloodberry wrote:Ehm, the European Servers are all at standard population at 5 pm, so before primetime. That is not really bad... Of course the servers were full in the first month after release, because... well... it was the first month.
I think you are pretty much overinterpreting. ^ haters gonna hate, etc etc. Also, last night, US primetime, the US servers were all at heavy and standard load. not a single light population server. A couple were full. That is simply not true at all, I know since I checked and at 2am eastern they were all light in both US and EU. By the way, "haters gonna hate" is the most common phrase used by Biodrones on the internet, that and WoW had problems at launch 2004  Not saying you are one but  Feel free to check xFire if you want server stats. I have put your problem in bold, underlined italics. 2 am est? I'm sleeping at that point as are most reasonable people, I imagine. US primetime check at like 7-9pm est, on a saturday.
That's usually a pretty big tactic among naysayers. I saw people pulling that stunt with Rift as well.
I checked Eve's population status at 6 am EST the other morning, and nobody was on! |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
1836
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 20:03:00 -
[50] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:
That's usually a pretty big tactic among naysayers. I saw people pulling that stunt with Rift as well.
I checked Eve's population status at 6 am EST the other morning, and nobody was on!
So EVE Just hit the iceberg=Evetanic!? |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 21:53:00 -
[51] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:2bhammered wrote:Jhagiti Tyran wrote:2bhammered wrote:Want real discussion? Look at my posts in this thread, now come back and tell me I did not post anything "real" here.
Peace! Your opinions and speculation on what the numbers mean isnt "real" in the sense that its just subjective. And again that is all what you offer to this thread, contradiction. Have a good day sir! Oh and the numbers are real for the record as are their meaning, you keep saying otherwise but you are wrong, plain and simple. Your reading comprehension needs some work, where in that post did I leave any contradiction? All I did was make it clear that a subjective opinion is something very different to a fact.Obviously that didn't sink so let me try to make it clear with an example. A fact would be, Star Wars: The old Republic is a game. A subjective opinion would be, Star Wars: The old Republic is a good/bad game. Now I have explained that lets go a little further. Listing the officially verified and published subscription figures is using a fact. Taking the officially verified and published subscription figures along with a very tightly sampled server population statistic and applying an analysis to them is subjective opinion.
You did it again, made a contradiction while offering nothing to the topic at hand 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnTmBjk-M0c

Whatever your reason is for contradicting me I hope you realize, when it hits you how bad SWToR has failed, that I ended up teaching you several things and you will learn from that and not remain ignorant. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 21:57:00 -
[52] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:Myxx wrote:2bhammered wrote:Myxx wrote:Lyrka Bloodberry wrote:Ehm, the European Servers are all at standard population at 5 pm, so before primetime. That is not really bad... Of course the servers were full in the first month after release, because... well... it was the first month.
I think you are pretty much overinterpreting. ^ haters gonna hate, etc etc. Also, last night, US primetime, the US servers were all at heavy and standard load. not a single light population server. A couple were full. That is simply not true at all, I know since I checked and at 2am eastern they were all light in both US and EU. By the way, "haters gonna hate" is the most common phrase used by Biodrones on the internet, that and WoW had problems at launch 2004  Not saying you are one but  Feel free to check xFire if you want server stats. I have put your problem in bold, underlined italics. 2 am est? I'm sleeping at that point as are most reasonable people, I imagine. US primetime check at like 7-9pm est, on a saturday. That's usually a pretty big tactic among naysayers. I saw people pulling that stunt with Rift as well. I checked Eve's population status at 6 am EST the other morning, and nobody was on!
By the way, look at the number of people logged in to play SWToR DURING peak times at this weekend as of now, worst since launch. Also you replied at my post about all servers showing status being light at 2am eastern time, but you did not realize that the number was for the whole world and there is a thing called time-zones. Oh and I laughed at the joke about zero players being online in EvE Online at certain hours, if you didn't know let me break the news to you now, EvE Online server never has zero players online except during maintenance, did I hurt your feelings now? Or did you think everyone playing SWToR and EvE Online are from USA and USA only?
What is even more funny is while all servers on SWToR were light/empty EvE Online had more players online on a single server, kind of bad for the next WoW killer wouldn't you agree? |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 22:02:00 -
[53] - Quote
Myxx wrote:2bhammered wrote:Myxx wrote:Lyrka Bloodberry wrote:Ehm, the European Servers are all at standard population at 5 pm, so before primetime. That is not really bad... Of course the servers were full in the first month after release, because... well... it was the first month.
I think you are pretty much overinterpreting. ^ haters gonna hate, etc etc. Also, last night, US primetime, the US servers were all at heavy and standard load. not a single light population server. A couple were full. That is simply not true at all, I know since I checked and at 2am eastern they were all light in both US and EU. By the way, "haters gonna hate" is the most common phrase used by Biodrones on the internet, that and WoW had problems at launch 2004  Not saying you are one but  Feel free to check xFire if you want server stats. I have put your problem in bold, underlined italics. 2 am est? I'm sleeping at that point as are most reasonable people, I imagine. US primetime check at like 7-9pm est, on a saturday.
Time-zones, I know, complicated thing to grasp but eventually you will get there 
Oh and as for ignoring all other stats provided in this thread I want to offer you a gold star and let you know that as of right now, SWToR has the worst server stats since launch and this is peak times on a weekend.
Thanks for the good laugh though, I never thought I would run into Biodrones on EvE Online forums, fracking everywhere  |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 22:11:00 -
[54] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Micheal Dietrich wrote:
That's usually a pretty big tactic among naysayers. I saw people pulling that stunt with Rift as well.
I checked Eve's population status at 6 am EST the other morning, and nobody was on!
So EVE Just hit the iceberg=Evetanic!?
It would be called that if they were as dumb enough to spend the amount of cash that EA has spent, yes. But since they didn't, not even close, this game is considered by all to be a success.
I recommend going to swtor.com and check the forums, it is like watching somebody getting hit on the nuts in slow motion  |

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
44
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 22:12:00 -
[55] - Quote
Here he goes again.
2bhammered wrote:
By the way, look at the number of people logged in to play SWToR DURING peak times at this weekend as of now, worst since launch.
You don't say! Let me guess, drops are noticeable at 1 month, 3 month, and 6 month intervals amirite?
2bhammered wrote: Also you replied at my post about all servers showing status being light at 2am eastern time, but you did not realize that the number was for the whole world and there is a thing called time-zones.
I didn't, I responded to the person who responded to you. But you said very specifically 4 am EST for US and EU servers. Now 4 am makes it roughly 9 am to about 1 pm for the EU, when people are generally working. Prime time at 4 am EST is in the Asia Pacific. Yes I do know timezones, I deal with them often.
2bhammered wrote:Oh and I laughed at the joke about zero players being online in EvE Online at certain hours, if you didn't know let me break the news to you now, EvE Online server never has zero players online except during maintenance
YOU DON'T SAY!!!!!    
2bhammered wrote:, did I hurt your feelings now?  Or did you think everyone playing SWToR and EvE Online are from USA and USA only? Yep, I are learn in school that USA won world in WW2. We own everything.
2bhammered wrote:What is even more funny is while all servers on SWToR were light/empty EvE Online had more players online one a single server, kind of bad for the next WoW killer wouldn't you agree?
This is why no fucks are given to the rants presented in this thread. All the tell-tale lingo is there. Wow-Killa, Tortanic, Game is dying, droves leavings, like wow, blah blah blah. This is like Deja Vu except with a different game title each time. I'm already am seeing this for GW:2 and it's technically not even an mmo, at least not in the standard payment sense.
|

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 22:39:00 -
[56] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:Here he goes again. No, here YOU go again  You don't say! Let me guess, drops are noticeable at 1 month, 3 month, and 6 month intervals amirite? WoW killer and popular MMORPG based on monthly subscriptions=decline in the first month!I didn't, I responded to the person who responded to you. But you said very specifically 4 am EST for US and EU servers. Now 4 am makes it roughly 9 am to about 1 pm for the EU, when people are generally working. Prime time at 4 am EST is in the Asia Pacific. Yes I do know timezones, I deal with them often. Your reply was at my post, I "VERY SPECIFICALLY" said 2am EST, not 4am, L2R=Learn to read, eureka. WoW, eve, rift and other MMORPGs all have servers above light/empty at those hours still to this day.YOU DON'T SAY!!!!!    If you can't pick up sarcasm by now I suggest you quit the internet  Yep, I are learn in school that USA won world in WW2. We own everything. Ok.This is why no fucks are given to the rants presented in this thread. All the tell-tale lingo is there. Wow-Killa, Tortanic, Game is dying, droves leavings, like wow, blah blah blah. This is like Deja Vu except with a different game title each time. I'm already seeing this for GW:2 and it's technically not even an mmo, at least not in the standard payment sense. No "fucks"? You accuse me of tell-tale lingo but I presented my argument with facts throughout my thread and having a good laugh at the game and community that tells itself that it has won the market and even killed EvE Online on top of ending WoW's 7+ year winning streak with one of the worst made AAA games in the last decade and is possibly and most likely the biggest failure in video gaming history financially and in popularity.
I also like to make a point that, GW2 is an MMORPG, I think you failed at understanding the definition of an MMO. I hope you will take this opportunity to learn what the definition is and everything else I have told you in this thread. Or, ignorance is bliss
My reply is in bold and underline, peace 
PS: This is for you and your kindred http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1gw0ByNPGU |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
219
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 23:20:00 -
[57] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Jhagiti Tyran wrote:2bhammered wrote:Jhagiti Tyran wrote:2bhammered wrote:Want real discussion? Look at my posts in this thread, now come back and tell me I did not post anything "real" here.
Peace! Your opinions and speculation on what the numbers mean isnt "real" in the sense that its just subjective. And again that is all what you offer to this thread, contradiction. Have a good day sir! Oh and the numbers are real for the record as are their meaning, you keep saying otherwise but you are wrong, plain and simple. Your reading comprehension needs some work, where in that post did I leave any contradiction? All I did was make it clear that a subjective opinion is something very different to a fact.Obviously that didn't sink so let me try to make it clear with an example. A fact would be, Star Wars: The old Republic is a game. A subjective opinion would be, Star Wars: The old Republic is a good/bad game. Now I have explained that lets go a little further. Listing the officially verified and published subscription figures is using a fact. Taking the officially verified and published subscription figures along with a very tightly sampled server population statistic and applying an analysis to them is subjective opinion. You did it again, made a contradiction while offering nothing to the topic at hand http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnTmBjk-M0c Whatever your reason is for contradicting me I hope you realize, when it hits you how bad SWToR has failed, that I ended up teaching you several things and you will learn from that and not remain ignorant.
Please re-quote my post and highlight exactly where I contradicted your opinion about how well SWToR is performing. I have offered no opinion or speculation about the games population, all I have tried to do is highlight the difference between opinion and fact.
It is a simple concept, I would have thought that the people who earn millions making speculation on games should be able to grasp it easily. They seem unable to realise when somebody is contradicting them either, I suppose they have their minds on weightier matters. Possibly wondering where the next bag of Cheetos is coming from? |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 23:27:00 -
[58] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:snip* to not waste kilobytes?
You bore me.
http://www.swtor.com/server-status
Ah, no longer bored 
http://www.swtor.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=255 |

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
44
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 00:11:00 -
[59] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Micheal Dietrich wrote:Here he goes again. No, here YOU go again 
Only one post to respond! You're losing you're edge man.
2bhammered wrote:WoW killer and popular MMORPG based on monthly subscriptions=decline in the first month!
Keyword! Lets see how many people are using that word in this thread. Well there's you and....you. I can link you at least 50 threads with users who have complained about SWTOR much like you, and you will see why I don't have to read your essay's in this thread. I've already have! At least 50 times! The lingo is all the same and it's all coming from the extreme group of the con's. You should be having this argument with the extreme pro's but there doesn't appear to be any here. May want to try the SWTOR forums.
2bhammered wrote: Your reply was at my post, I "VERY SPECIFICALLY" said 2am EST, not 4am, L2R=Learn to read, eureka. WoW, eve, rift and other MMORPGs all have servers above light/empty at those hours still to this day.
Rift no, many servers are light even on prime time now. Eve, yeah no ****, we're one server. I'd figure that would be a blatant duh but you have proven me wrong. I bet you if we broke it down to 50 servers with half based in the US and half based in the EU, we would see the exact same thing. Wow - I figure this would be another duh considering that Wow has US, EU, and Asia servers AND a population of 9.5 million.
2bhammered wrote: If you can't pick up sarcasm by now I suggest you quit the internet 
I guess where you come from it's sarcasm. Over here we call it stating the obvious. You see, my comment was sarcastic as the time I chose is the downtime for the EST. Your comment told me what I already knew.
Ran out of quotes at this point.
No "fucks"? You accuse me of tell-tale lingo but I presented my argument with facts throughout my thread and having a good laugh at the game and community that tells itself that it has won the market and even killed EvE Online on top of ending WoW's 7+ year winning streak with one of the worst made AAA games in the last decade and is possibly and most likely the biggest failure in video gaming history financially and in popularity.
I did accuse you of tell-tale lingo. It's littered through out this entire thread. You've jumped on the bandwagon with calling it Tortanic and claiming it's the supposed wow-killer. Strange, I was also informed that Rift was the Wow-killer. Oh and so is Terra and GW:2. Same comments, different game. You also have posted no facts about this huge failure. I don't see star games turning into FTP yet. It still has far more people than WAR, AOC, and even Eve (combined even). And it's right on par with every other launch that I've seen. I also see that you are using the words possibly and most likely. That tells me you aren't quite sure.
I also like to make a point that, GW2 is an MMORPG, I think you failed at understanding the definition of an MMO. I hope you will take this opportunity to learn what the definition is and everything else I have told you in this thread. Or, ignorance is bliss
I said it's not an mmo in the standard method that we know of. And there you are accusing me of reading failure. If GW:2 uses the same economic build as GW:1, all you will be expected to purchase is the game itself (along with expansion packs, weapon packs, class packs...). No subscription. Even the FTP's have a subscription mode for high end content. By the way, did I mention that GW:2 is the next wow-killer? Just thought you should know that so you can jot it down for your GW:2 rant.
Again, who cares what the other game is doing? My friend bought and says that he really enjoys it, good for him. I made the decision long ago that it didn't appeal to me and I let it be. I don't give a **** what its doing, just like I don't give a **** about the status of many other mmo's. And one thing that I have certainly learned is to take anything a mouthbreather with a list of catch phrases has to say with a grain of salt. 10 mil says I'll be seeing these rants from you for the next 6 months updating us on some other game that is still doing well, though you'll take the standard population drops at the describe intervals as game is dying. This is like dealing with Smoothmage all over again. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 00:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
  
Micheal Dietrich wrote: Again, who cares what the other game is doing? I don't give a **** what its doing, just like I don't give a **** about the status of many other mmo's. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 02:05:00 -
[61] - Quote
EA downgraded to neutral
http://research.tdameritrade.com/public/stocks/news/story.asp?docKey=4018-EDD480048AC047B2AFC4AA7FCF54FB0E-2UV7P54MAD3QC6VP8UCAKI0LV2 |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
219
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 04:28:00 -
[62] - Quote
So why are you so butthurt about ToR? Are you mad because you paid for a game you didn't like? Are you mad because other people like it when you did not and now you want to justify your dislike by seeing the game perform poorly? Perhaps its because the game is in competition with a game you like?
Did George Lucas ruin your life with the Phantom Menace? Where you on the SWG team at SOE and got sacked after it closed just before the release of ToR?
I am not trolling I am genuinely interested, the population of the game (or the game itself) doesn't interest me but I am really curious about what's causing you and all of the others to rampage all over the internet spamming about how ToR is dying, dead sucks and all other kinds of hyperbole.
Its almost pathological, the only other thing people seem so fervent about is "WAKE UP SHEEPLE 9/11 WAS INSIDE JOB!!!111!!". I am curious about what is causing it. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 15:02:00 -
[63] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:So why are you so butthurt about ToR? Are you mad because you paid for a game you didn't like? Are you mad because other people like it when you did not and now you want to justify your dislike by seeing the game perform poorly? Perhaps its because the game is in competition with a game you like?
Did George Lucas ruin your life with the Phantom Menace? Where you on the SWG team at SOE and got sacked after it closed just before the release of ToR?
I am not trolling I am genuinely interested, the population of the game (or the game itself) doesn't interest me but I am really curious about what's causing you and all of the others to rampage all over the internet spamming about how ToR is dying, dead sucks and all other kinds of hyperbole.
Its almost pathological, the only other thing people seem so fervent about is "WAKE UP SHEEPLE 9/11 WAS INSIDE JOB!!!111!!". I am curious about what is causing it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzDIClx-_pY |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:30:00 -
[64] - Quote
http://www.swtor.com/server-status
During peak hours on a Saturday, the busiest day of the week at time of posting this, we have 20 heavy, 174 standard and 22 light servers. Worst weekend since launch, previous was worse than that before and all the way back to end of December last year. No one can argue that it has failed considered time and money invested into a game that not only lacks some sort of growth but is dying in numbers within a month after launch.
Their forums is fun though, people still claiming it is killing WoW and EVE etc as we speak  |

Astenion
Spiritus Draconis
143
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:32:00 -
[65] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:Quote:SWTOR cost 300+ million to make I like how this number keeps going up each time I see it.
THIS. First it was 80 million, then it was 150 million. Next it jumped to 200 million, and now we see it has reached the 300 million mark.
Wow, geniuses. Before long, Bioware will be its own country and have its own government and budget at this rate if it can fork out 300 million dollars to develop games. Imagine how rich they'll be in ten years! They'll be able to join the UN and maybe even become a part of NATO and develop its own military made up of gamers who have never fired a weapon in their life but can play BF3 really well.
GET OFF MY INTERNET. |

Astenion
Spiritus Draconis
143
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:40:00 -
[66] - Quote
I don't see the big deal. Are you that big of a pathetic nerd as to actually be ELITIST about an internet science fiction role playing video game? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?!?!
Forever alone = you |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:41:00 -
[67] - Quote
Astenion wrote:Micheal Dietrich wrote:Quote:SWTOR cost 300+ million to make I like how this number keeps going up each time I see it. THIS. First it was 80 million, then it was 150 million. Next it jumped to 200 million, and now we see it has reached the 300 million mark. Wow, geniuses. Before long, Bioware will be its own country and have its own government and budget at this rate if it can fork out 300 million dollars to develop games. Imagine how rich they'll be in ten years! They'll be able to join the UN and maybe even become a part of NATO and develop its own military made up of gamers who have never fired a weapon in their life but can play BF3 really well. GET OFF MY INTERNET.
http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/01/17/analyst-believes-star-wars-the-old-republic-had-a-500-million/
EA refuse to tell us how much it is.
Michael Pachter made up the 80 million USD price tag way back. Most believe it is around 300 million USD, latest analysts think it is infact 500 million USD.
You are welcome to investigate it further. The more I have tried to figure out how much it is and take into consideration how much it costs to create a new studio and offices etc. Not to mention the trailers, 7 years of development and more, 300 million USD seems to make sense and I think that is why it is the most quoted figure. It could be more, I doubt it could be less. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:42:00 -
[68] - Quote
Astenion wrote:I don't see the big deal. Are you that big of a pathetic nerd as to actually be ELITIST about an internet science fiction role playing video game? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?!?!
Forever alone = you
Calm down, relax and take your medication  |

Astenion
Spiritus Draconis
143
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:48:00 -
[69] - Quote
Show me who these analysts are and show me where they're quoted as saying IT'S HALF A BILLION ******* DOLLARS FOR A ******* VIDEO GAME. That's absolute LUNACY. Voice acting just doesn't cost that much and the video game is not even close graphically to other video games of today. IT RUNS ON DX9 FOR DOG'S SAKE! Were they all snorting coke off hookers' **** every morning for 7 years?
Had they made an entire game from start to finish, scrapped it, and then started all over from the very beginning with a completely new graphics engine, new voice actors, cutting edge technology, ten times as big a universe as it is now, and even made a movie to go with it, IT STILL WOULDN'T HAVE COST 500 MILLION DOLLARS. I don't need to investigate further because all this is is a bunch of video game nerds pulling bullshit out of their asses. |

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
49
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:49:00 -
[70] - Quote
You guys heard it here first. Two hundred and sixteen servers filled with players enjoying the game is fail (Keyword!).
Edit: Rough approximation based on server size 3000 we get 430,000 fails playing online currently. Pretty much dead on with my drop off prediction that I had with other users on the Rift forums. It's also 9 times more fail than Eve has online currently. |

Astenion
Spiritus Draconis
143
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:49:00 -
[71] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Astenion wrote:I don't see the big deal. Are you that big of a pathetic nerd as to actually be ELITIST about an internet science fiction role playing video game? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?!?!
Forever alone = you Calm down, relax and take your medication 
Sorry, but I have zero tolerance for people who say stupid **** simply because it's the first thing that comes to their mind. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:51:00 -
[72] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:You guys heard it here first. Two hundred and sixteen servers filled with players enjoying the game is fail (Keyword!).
#64Posted: 2012.02.11 20:30 | Report | Edited by: 2bhammered http://www.swtor.com/server-status
During peak hours on a Saturday, the busiest day of the week at time of posting this, we have 20 heavy, 174 standard and 22 light servers. Worst weekend since launch, previous was worse than that before and all the way back to end of December last year. No one can argue that it has failed considered time and money invested into a game that not only lacks some sort of growth but is dying in numbers within a month after launch.
Their forums is fun though, people still claiming it is killing WoW and EVE etc as we speak .
You seem to care a lot about this thread  |

Astenion
Spiritus Draconis
143
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:59:00 -
[73] - Quote
Here's what has to be taken into account: it's not WoW, it's Star Wars. SW has millions of fans, this is true, but not every single fan is going to play an MMO of SW. I, for example, never played SWG because it didn't interest me even though I am a huge SW fan.
This is a game that revolves around the SW universe and people who aren't big fans of SW aren't going to fork over money every month to play a video game they probably won't like. You have somehow jumped to the conclusion that it's a world easily accessible to the layperson like WoW was. This just isn't the case.
If anything, SWTOR is closer to Eve due to its niche market. It's not an underground title from a small company, but nonetheless it's only going to appeal to those who enjoy Star Wars. I fail to see how so many have overlooked this fact when it's as plain as day. |

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
49
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:59:00 -
[74] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:You seem to care a lot about this thread 
I enjoy pointing out fallacies in idiotic logic, it's a side hobby of mine. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 21:12:00 -
[75] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:2bhammered wrote:You seem to care a lot about this thread  I enjoy pointing out fallacies in idiotic logic, it's a side hobby of mine.
You have done it quite a few times in this thread already, that is, pointing out to everyone that you have "idiotic logic". I have humored you this far by responding to your posts with reason and even a bit of humor, but since all you can do is troll and use contradiction in your arguments in more than one thread I shall stop and leave you for good to rant, cry and ***** all you want all day long.
Just remember, this is a forum with a thread about a video game, not the end of the world  |

Astenion
Spiritus Draconis
143
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 21:14:00 -
[76] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:
You are the only one here saying "stupid ****" simply because it is the first thing that came to your mind. Also you are behaving like a madman for the record, take a deep breath, read my disclaimer and calm the **** down because you are about to have a brain aneurysm if you keep this up.
I think you overestimate your powers of perception, Dr. Shrinkmann. The first thing that came to my mind is that you're an idiot if you actually believe these "analysts" (who, by the way, you still haven't referenced) claim it cost them half a billion dollars to make a video game on par with 2007/8 technology, and you see nothing at all wrong with that statement. This is not madness, this is reality, and you have officially broken with it.
Like I said, zero tolerance for stupid ****. If you don't like my calling you out on it, stop pulling ridiculous crap out of your ass. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 21:26:00 -
[77] - Quote
Astenion wrote:2bhammered wrote:
You are the only one here saying "stupid ****" simply because it is the first thing that came to your mind. Also you are behaving like a madman for the record, take a deep breath, read my disclaimer and calm the **** down because you are about to have a brain aneurysm if you keep this up.
I think you overestimate your powers of perception, Dr. Shrinkmann. The first thing that came to my mind is that you're an idiot if you actually believe these "analysts" (who, by the way, you still haven't referenced) claim it cost them half a billion dollars to make a video game on par with 2007/8 technology, and you see nothing at all wrong with that statement. This is not madness, this is reality, and you have officially broken with it. Like I said, zero tolerance for stupid ****. If you don't like my calling you out on it, stop pulling ridiculous crap out of your ass.
No I don't think I overestimate my power of perception at all. In fact, I would bet money on that you do see a shrink and take meds, that or you are very passionate about SWToR. But I honestly do not care one way or the other, nor will I care enough talk to you anymore. I just wanted you to calm down because the way you write a post it seems like you are slamming your keyboard screaming and throwing a fit, which is not healthy at all. Also not what I want people to do with this thread.
Feel free to rant and cry about my thread until your face is blue though, I wont try to stop you, peace |

Micheal Dietrich
Standards and Practices
49
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 21:26:00 -
[78] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Micheal Dietrich wrote:2bhammered wrote:You seem to care a lot about this thread  I enjoy pointing out fallacies in idiotic logic, it's a side hobby of mine. You have done it quite a few times in this thread already, that is, pointing out to everyone that you have "idiotic logic". I have humored you this far by responding to your posts with reason and even a bit of humor, but since all you can do is troll and use contradiction in your arguments in more than one thread I shall stop and leave you for good to rant, cry and ***** all you want all day long. Just remember, this is a forum with a thread about a video game, not the end of the world 
Haha the old switch-a-roo of my comment! Forum tactic #33. Oh dear, you completely have me cornered now! What. Ever. Shall. I. Do?
And you are correct, it is a video game and not the end of the world. For the majority of us anyways. But you are hell bent on seeing some supposed destruction of a game that you didn't enjoy. For the average person, when they don't enjoy a video game, they simply quit and move on but you, no, you must lobby for it's downfall and post inane dribble. We knew a lawyer like that once, his name was Jack Thompson. |

Astenion
Spiritus Draconis
143
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 21:38:00 -
[79] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:No I don't think I overestimate my power of perception at all. In fact, I would bet money on that you do see a shrink and take meds, that or you are very passionate about SWToR. But I honestly do not care one way or the other, nor will I care enough talk to you anymore. I just wanted you to calm down because the way you write a post it seems like you are slamming your keyboard screaming and throwing a fit, which is not healthy at all. Also not what I want people to do with this thread. Feel free to rant and cry about my thread until your face is blue though, I wont try to stop you, peace 
Haha, the troll is strong with this one. I'm going to question people's sanity when I'm discovered to be full of it because my skin is so thin you can read a newspaper through it. Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing, just banging away at the keyboard frantically and punching my monitor. Oh, the frustration.
Forums are an art form of debate, which you suck at terribly. If you can't back up your claims or even see your idiocy, just stop posting. If you don't like being called out for saying stupid crap, stop posting stupid crap for which you will be called out. If you can't understand sarcasm with bite, stop posting...hell, for that matter what are you doing in Eve if you can't take the spears? |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 21:40:00 -
[80] - Quote
Bioware Austin http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRrMu7B1L2I |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 22:41:00 -
[81] - Quote
"Francis rages about Star Wars the old republic"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JToIHroU-WY&feature=fvwrel
Funniest game rant ever 
(tune in tomorrow for more videos, biodrones and tortanic stuff) |

Astenion
Spiritus Draconis
143
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 00:15:00 -
[82] - Quote
Ah Francis...I've been waiting for this one. This is destined to become a classic. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
47
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 00:39:00 -
[83] - Quote
Astenion wrote:Ah Francis...I've been waiting for this one. This is destined to become a classic.
He is funny, check his latest video when he destroys his xbox 
A funny pic a bit off-topic but funny 
http://i42.tinypic.com/2j2sqw9.jpg |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
63
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 10:16:00 -
[84] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooQcJ7_kAvE&feature=related Train-wreck has arrived!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjxLk-KsmmA&feature=related No love for Australians!
Ok end of fun now let's be serious
http://youtu.be/SLExu-OjkPY |

Brujo Loco
Brujeria Teologica
328
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 17:35:00 -
[85] - Quote
This thread is gorgeous, people rebuking each other's claim will make my monday tomorrow at the office.
Please keep it going and alive, I for one sub to the FAIL TOR , Tortanic mindset, but must hopelessly admit I shelled 60$ for this plastic box made in china gizmo : Book of Sith Vault Edition
IT OPENS AND CLOSES OMGGGGGGGG STAR WARSSSSS ... meh , I want it  Inner Sayings of BrujoLoco: http://eve-files.com/sig/brujoloco |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
64
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 03:44:00 -
[86] - Quote
Brujo Loco wrote:This thread is gorgeous, people rebuking each other's claim will make my monday tomorrow at the office. Please keep it going and alive, I for one sub to the FAIL TOR , Tortanic mindset, but must hopelessly admit I shelled 60$ for this plastic box made in china gizmo : Book of Sith Vault Edition IT OPENS AND CLOSES OMGGGGGGGG STAR WARSSSSS ... meh , I want it 
I try my best to bring entertainment
I also had a sub, because one have to in order to play/use my 28 free days (yep EA screwed over a lot of people not giving them a month, or EA month=28 days,) but I did not mind since I stopped playing after 2 weeks or something, it was that boring. I think Bioware lacks what they use to have, it is called "fun".
This is a good review that sums up a lot of the problems with SWToR.
http://www.wolfsheadonline.com/swtors-300-million-virtual-bridge-to-nowhere/#b5414
Most common word by the way used to describe SWToR, they had a thread on the official forums for people to use one word to describe the game. That word is "Soulless" and says it all really.
By the way, why buy the book? Just google it,even youtube has them uploaded, I listened to Revan on youtube. I also regretted it
Now over to something completely different! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9C9OKMyZng&feature=related
Oh and a great comic depicting Bioware, SWToR and fans based on revenge of the sith movie.
http://imgur.com/a/mgIyx |

Drachiel
Mercury LLC
9
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 06:05:00 -
[87] - Quote
SWTor massive stinking bomb.
Server stats in the floor. |

Astrid Stjerna
Teraa Matar
608
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 09:20:00 -
[88] - Quote
2bhammered wrote: They never cared, they never cared about making a great game, they just wanted something fast to capitalize on WoWs success and get a piece of the pie.
The thing to know about EA is that they've had that reputation for a long, long time. Back when EA was publishing for Origin (the makers of the Ultima series), they were notorious for rushed (and very incomplete) products, family-destroying mandatory overtime and unreasonable launch dates.
Ultima VII Part I: rushed, but thankfully finished properly. Ultima VII Part II: rushed and unfinished. Ultima VIII: cancelled expansion pack, dangling plot hooks. Ultima IX: executive-meddled into a god-awful, bug-filled, nearly-unplayable, lore-destroying mess. Ultima Online: filled with samurai and elves (neither of which have ever appeared in the Ultima universe). UO II: cancelled because it would compete with its predecessor.
After a huge backlash from 'Widows of EA', they relented and started to clean up, but the reputation still lingers.... ((Please note:-áAt times, my characters-ámay be a-holes, but-áI am most certainly not.-áWhat they say IC has no bearing on my OOC opinions or behaviors, and I apologize in advance if you are offended OOC by anything I might say or do-áIC.)) |

mama guru
Evolution
25
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 12:07:00 -
[89] - Quote
tortanic is what happens when a bunch of idiots from /v/ and reddit starts posting about a less than satisfactory launch. It's not gonna die just because you have nothing better to post about.
______
EVE online is the fishermans friend of MMO's. If it's too hard you are too weak. |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
1861
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 13:56:00 -
[90] - Quote
mama guru wrote:tortanic is what happens when a bunch of idiots from /v/ and reddit starts posting about a less than satisfactory launch. It's not gonna die just because you have nothing better to post about.
They're just putting a dramatic presentation for the declining population trend and feelings of disapointment many players have felt. By looking at the server population trends it seems clear that the game peaked soon after launch and has been on a steady decline ever since. It will likely peak again in march, since it launches it's initial asian servers then, but the current trend confirms its popularity is in a steady decline. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
69
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 16:11:00 -
[91] - Quote
Astrid Stjerna wrote:2bhammered wrote: They never cared, they never cared about making a great game, they just wanted something fast to capitalize on WoWs success and get a piece of the pie.
The thing to know about EA is that they've had that reputation for a long, long time. Back when EA was publishing for Origin (the makers of the Ultima series), they were notorious for rushed (and very incomplete) products, family-destroying mandatory overtime and unreasonable launch dates. Ultima VII Part I: rushed, but thankfully finished properly. Ultima VII Part II: rushed and unfinished. Ultima VIII: cancelled expansion pack, dangling plot hooks. Ultima IX: executive-meddled into a god-awful, bug-filled, nearly-unplayable, lore-destroying mess. Ultima Online: filled with samurai and elves (neither of which have ever appeared in the Ultima universe). UO II: cancelled because it would compete with its predecessor. After a huge backlash from 'Widows of EA', they relented and started to clean up, but the reputation still lingers....
EA to me is what most big movie and music studios are today, perhaps even worse.
I remember when they started to change and accept the fact that they have lost it. They even took a few risks making new IP's such as Dead Space, with a clear stated goal to be at the top of meta-critic. Now they buy review scores and when users give a score less than 8 out of 10 they even went as far as accuse/imply that fans of WoW went on some campaign to destroy its reputation.
It is kinda funny, but I think they have gone mad over at BW and EA. It would not surprise me to learn that they really think their game is worth 5/5 even though they paid for reviewers to give it that score. It is akin to George Lucas coming up with Jar Jar Binks thinking it is a great character and is funny because the people he pay agrees with him.
EA has lost money for years and years and continue to do so, their management handles the company in a similar manner to that of a bank or investment firm etc. Perhaps they think they are eligible to bailouts?
|

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
69
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 16:22:00 -
[92] - Quote
mama guru wrote:tortanic is what happens when a bunch of idiots from /v/ and reddit starts posting about a less than satisfactory launch. It's not gonna die just because you have nothing better to post about.
It is dying as a game, it is dead as far as EA and BW goals with this game as those of their investors. The game is a massive failure both as a piece of entertainment and financial investment.
If you want to put your head in the sand and ignore that fact and pretend everyone such as I are mere "trolls" and "idiots" go for it, but don't think your conviction can alter reality. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
69
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 16:29:00 -
[93] - Quote
http://herocomplex.latimes.com/2012/01/20/star-wars-the-old-republic-the-story-behind-a-galactic-gamble/#/0
Interesting article above about the development. Some sweet bits of truth that offers further explanation as to how and why EA and BW ****** up SWTOR.
IE-
"Art has been outsourced to Russia, Estonia and China. Motion capture filming is done in L.A. and Vancouver, Canada, with voices recorded in New York, London and Paris in English, French and German. Quality assurance testing takes place in Romania, Argentina and India, while technical operations are run out of Virginia and the customer service center operates in Ireland. A regular plane shuttles employees between Austin and Electronic ArtsGÇÖ headquarters in Redwood Shores, Calif."
Worst planning ever??
"After attempts to adapt GÇ£Lord of the Rings,GÇ¥ GÇ£A Game of ThronesGÇ¥ and Marvel comic book super-heroes like such as Spider-Man, the team signed a co-publishing deal with GÇ£Star WarsGÇ¥ creator George Lucas."
Not first choice ha? I wonder if you even "wanted" to make a Star Wars MMO at all... |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
69
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 20:09:00 -
[94] - Quote
The user rating of Star Wars: The Old Republic on Metacritic is lower, however - but Ohlen was quick to explain why he thinks that is.
"Oh that's easy," he retorted. "Several of the designers were watching the Metacritic page when it finally came up and what happened was there is a community out there, and we don't know who they are - it could be a bunch of different people - who aren't really playing the game but have a vested interest in hating the game. And we saw literally hundreds of 0/10s come up within the first couple of hours of Metacritic coming on. So it was people who weren't even playing the game basically putting on that they hated it.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-01-12-bioware-swtor-post-mortem-its-more-innovative-than-an-fps
Where ignorance is bliss... |

Nerath Naaris
Pink Winged Unicorns for Peace Love and Anarchy
78
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 23:38:00 -
[95] - Quote
Astrid Stjerna wrote: Ultima VII Part I: rushed, but thankfully finished properly. Ultima VII Part II: rushed and unfinished. Ultima VIII: cancelled expansion pack, dangling plot hooks. Ultima IX: executive-meddled into a god-awful, bug-filled, nearly-unplayable, lore-destroying mess. Ultima Online: filled with samurai and elves (neither of which have ever appeared in the Ultima universe). UO II: cancelled because it would compete with its predecessor.
Funny that you mention that.... remember the main villains from Ultima VII?
Elisabeth & Abraham.
E & A.....
And no, that wasn-¦t a coincidence. Unbanned since 2011.10.20. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
69
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 18:36:00 -
[96] - Quote
Prime time folks!!
http://www.swtor.com/server-status
1 server heavy!
100 standard!
110 light!!
http://beta.xfire.com/games/swtor |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
1897
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 19:34:00 -
[97] - Quote
Is there a particular point you want to make or are you just responding to criticism of you choosing a bad time for your previous server status measurement? Everyone grounded in reality knows people are logging in less and less to the game. In all likelyhood the game is bleeding subs, but there is no way of telling at what speed, since you can explain the severity of the server status changes in all kinds of various ways(for example end of holidays and people play less at max level and after the initial playing spree, ect. depending on how desperate you are to give it a positive spin). Basicly meaning until you get exact figures you can even attempt to claim they're increasing their sub count at a good rate and the players are just loggin in less for various reasons.
Just to make it clear, I don't doubt the game has troubles right now and what BW will do in the next month or two will decide how severe the bleeding will end up being. I know people who play or played the game and the story from them is always pretty much the same. Really excited at the start, good leveling experience and then at max level everyone loses interest in a few weeks and the ones who still play are finding less and less reason to do so, since their guild mates have abandoned the game and they can't access the content anymore due to difficulty of finding groups and are thinking of following their friends back to whatever game they went back to. Final verdict varies between weak to average MMO with good leveling.
|

stoicfaux
760
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 01:33:00 -
[98] - Quote
Got a survey in the email (I played in the beta.) After selecting that I wasn't going to buy the game, I got some interesting questions.
You can tell me what is and isn't Truth when you pry the tinfoil from my cold, lifeless head.
|

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
71
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 12:12:00 -
[99] - Quote
http://www.keenandgraev.com/2012/02/14/copy-gold-leader-out/
Keen says he is out.
http://www.swtor.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=255
Forums are on fire and...
http://www.torocast.com/content/1330304692/torocast-ep-141-everyone-moves
Let's talk about GW2 on the longest running tor fan podcast and about how awesome it will be :D (because SWTOR sucks.)
PS: TOR had the worst server stats this weekend since its launch, like previous weekend and the one before that and the one before that one etc... |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3303
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 20:01:00 -
[100] - Quote
I predicted this happening when somone describe ToR as Instanceville.
Found this thread funny anyone want to start betting isk?
http://www.swtor.com/community/showthread.php?t=330046&page=1
I say 250k subs in 6 months.
50 mil isk.
|

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
74
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 04:08:00 -
[101] - Quote
I'll be putting 50mil ISK for maximum 300k subs at the end of May 
Feel free to take my bet! |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 09:19:00 -
[102] - Quote
http://penny-arcade.com/report/editorial-article/the-doctors-from-bioware-discuss-the-old-republic-launch-ending-a-trilogy-a
Possible Mass Effect MMO? Ray Muzyka CEO of Bioware Corp seems to think so.
GÇ£Now that weGÇÖve learned MMOs are really easy to make, and simple to run after the fact, weGÇÖre on it!GÇ¥ |

Zeomebuch Nova
Metalworks
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 18:56:00 -
[103] - Quote
OP, you seem to very emotional regarding either the success or fail of SwTor (a game i have not even touched).
Just out of curiosity (and being serious):
How much time have you spent hating this game? Was the time worth it? |

Stellar Vix
State War Academy Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 20:48:00 -
[104] - Quote
It would be much less time you would waste on it if you heed her warnings. |

Zeomebuch Nova
Metalworks
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 22:13:00 -
[105] - Quote
Stellar Vix wrote:It would be much less time you would waste on it if you heed her warnings.
This meaning, that he does all the hating, because he care about the time of unknown people would or would not waste?
Interesting, not even my mom back then cared so much about my own time. |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
237
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 23:17:00 -
[106] - Quote
Zeomebuch Nova wrote:Stellar Vix wrote:It would be much less time you would waste on it if you heed her warnings. This meaning, that he does all the hating, because he cares about the potentially wasted time of unknown people? Interesting, not even my mom cared so much about my own time back then. I feel important now.
Bioware haters are fun, the magnificent Jim Sterling describes them well,
Quote:It's becoming an annual circus that we all have free tickets to. A new BioWare game is released, and there's a catastrophic fallout of complaints, accusations, and histrionic rage. Some of it's ridiculous, some of it's justified, but all of it can prove entertaining for the spectators.
Thank god for Jim. |

Erk Aspurgur
Ghost Patrol Bringers of Death.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 18:04:00 -
[107] - Quote
i just wanted to say that i left swtor for playing eve, have played 2 months and this is a very fascinating game, complex, and uniqe game unless most other mmos. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 18:42:00 -
[108] - Quote
Erk Aspurgur wrote:i just wanted to say that i left swtor for playing eve, have played 2 months and this is a very fascinating game, complex, and uniqe game unless most other mmos.
Objection!
Unique?
Are you serious??? |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 18:45:00 -
[109] - Quote
Zeomebuch Nova wrote:Stellar Vix wrote:It would be much less time you would waste on it if you heed her warnings. This meaning, that he does all the hating, because he cares about the potentially wasted time of unknown people? Interesting, not even my mom cared so much about my own time back then. I feel important now.
Hey, do you post this drivel on reddit, 4chan, ign.com, 1up.com, gamespot.com, shakcnews.com, youtube.com, facebook.com, rottentomatoes.com, twitter.com, blogs, other forums etc?
Yes, you are important, so important that you bumped a thread I and others already left long ago 
Thanks! |

Erk Aspurgur
Ghost Patrol Bringers of Death.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 21:48:00 -
[110] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Erk Aspurgur wrote:i just wanted to say that i left swtor for playing eve, have played 2 months and this is a very fascinating game, complex, and uniqe game unless most other mmos. Objection!Unique?COMPLEX??? ARE YOU SERIOUS???
hmm, i think u got it wrong, mayby you should try to read my post again... |

Lady Skank
Ban Evasion inc
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 23:11:00 -
[111] - Quote
Erk Aspurgur wrote:2bhammered wrote:Erk Aspurgur wrote:i just wanted to say that i left swtor for playing eve, have played 2 months and this is a very fascinating game, complex, and uniqe game unless most other mmos. Objection!Unique?COMPLEX??? ARE YOU SERIOUS??? hmm, i think u got it wrong, mayby you should try to read my post again...
One has to wonder how so much stupid can fit into a single person. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 23:40:00 -
[112] - Quote
Erk Aspurgur wrote:
hmm, i think u got it wrong, mayby you should try to read my post again...
I read it again.
I hope you can forgive me and welcome to EvE Online  |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 23:41:00 -
[113] - Quote
Lady Skank wrote:
One has to wonder how so much stupid can fit into a single person.
Indeed, I read his post as "left for swtor" when it was "left swtor for". Have a good day Skank! |

Erk Aspurgur
Ghost Patrol Bringers of Death.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 23:47:00 -
[114] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Erk Aspurgur wrote:
hmm, i think u got it wrong, mayby you should try to read my post again...
I read it again. I hope you can forgive me and welcome to EvE Online 
hehe, np and thanks. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 23:52:00 -
[115] - Quote
Erk Aspurgur wrote:2bhammered wrote:Erk Aspurgur wrote:
hmm, i think u got it wrong, mayby you should try to read my post again...
I read it again. I hope you can forgive me and welcome to EvE Online  hehe, np and thanks. 
If you need anything just let me know. Tips, help or whatever, just send me a mail in-game to this character if you can think of something. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 01:27:00 -
[116] - Quote
http://www.pcgamer.com/2012/03/08/behind-the-scenes-of-star-wars-the-old-republic-throwing-people-at-the-problem/
"During the last six months of development, the team began a difficult triage process; where features that werenGÇÖt going to make it for launch were cut. All development heads were summoned to daily meetings at what Dallas dubbed GÇÿThe Death StarGÇÖ GÇô with each team being coached on what to cut, and what to keep. GÇ£Some developers cried,GÇ¥ explained Dallas. GÇ£I didnGÇÖt enjoy that.GÇ¥"
"To grow, the TOR team were hiring relentlessly. Dallas explained that they would travel to game development schools around the US and offer the top ten percent of each graduating class a year long contract to work in Austin."
"To build the game, the team hired in stages; first building a structure they thought that would work, before laying on staff. At peak, the team size was staggering: 280 QA staff. 140 artists split evenly between internal and outsourced staff. 80 engineers and programmers, 75 designers, 40 platform engineers and 30 producers to manage the teamGÇÖs workload and organise."
If interested read the full article, it does offer some good insights into the problems with developing SWTOR.
Today http://beta.xfire.com/games/swtor further dropping with only one server reaching status "heavy" in the EU.
SWTOR now marked as warhammer online with a Star Wars skin has now more problems to deal with after the failure of Mass Effect 3 and in general EA failing at every turn. |

Adacia Calla
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 00:31:00 -
[117] - Quote
It has about the same features and gameplay as WoW: The Burning Crusade, with worse raid bosses. Test signature....forum not applying settings :( |

Indus Mono
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 04:04:00 -
[118] - Quote
I shared this in another thread but I think it's pertinent here too --> SWTOR video says it all (with boobs)
|

Lord Mandelor
Consolidated Holdings War Ensemble.
132
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 06:03:00 -
[119] - Quote
The F2P weekend is going to be amazing. "The ship isn't sinking! My side just rose up 200 feet!" ConHo Daily: http://conhodaily.blogspot.com Stories ranging from midgets inside your Damage Control to drones becoming self-aware. |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
237
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:15:00 -
[120] - Quote
2bhammered wrote: the failure of Mass Effect 3 and in general EA failing at every turn.r
Rubbish, Mass Effect 3 outsells Mass Effect 1 & 2 combined |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:08:00 -
[121] - Quote
Oh boy, are we getting desperate now? It is talking about UK sales on one chart at one retailer but "they don't have exact figures"     
Go to bed Tyran, you are like not even trying anymore...
PS: Mass Effect 3 was not even being sold in GAME's shops. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:11:00 -
[122] - Quote
Lord Mandelor wrote:The F2P weekend is going to be amazing. "The ship isn't sinking! My side just rose up 200 feet!"
I guess they are trying out the waters for when it goes full F2P? |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
237
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:00:00 -
[123] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Oh boy, are we getting desperate now?  It is talking about UK sales on one chart at one retailer but "they don't have exact figures"      Go to bed Tyran, you are like not even trying anymore... PS: Mass Effect 3 was not even being sold in GAME's shops.
Not desperate at all, facts are facts. Data collected by a reliable source>your blinkered opinion. Face it ME3 sold like hot cakes, all the sales figures, analysis of global distribution and sales all support that fact.
Remember,
Fact>subjective opinion
You can reply with a weak Ad hominem and support the facts I linked with sources with your failure, or you can try and defeat the argument with some facts of your own.
|

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:30:00 -
[124] - Quote
facts, right, you supply me with bullshit then dress it up as a fact.
In that case, enjoy this fact!
SWTOR going F2P already lol |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
237
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:49:00 -
[125] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:facts, right, you supply me with bullshit then dress it up as a fact.
In that case, enjoy this fact!
SWTOR going F2P already lol
I couldn't care less about SWTOR, I don't play carebear themepark MMOs.
I just enjoy correcting your hate inspired rhetoric about ME3, sure the game isn't what people expected but sales wise its an enormous success. Oh and stick this in your pipe and smoke it,
Kingdoms of Amalur is also a success, its a new IP yet its approaching 500,000 sales. On Saturday it sold 330k copies and took 4th place on the US sales chart for February. Media attention and positive reviews means it is still selling.
Live feed from 2bhammered webcam |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:56:00 -
[126] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:"I couldn't care less about SWTOR..."
Oh, really? 
/posted in thread "SWToR Just hit the iceberg=Tortanic!" |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
237
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 16:27:00 -
[127] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Jhagiti Tyran wrote:"I couldn't care less about SWTOR..." Oh, really?  /posted in thread "SWToR Just hit the iceberg=Tortanic!"
Selective quoting at its finest, you derailed the thread with your rant about ME3. Nice to see how you conceded the argument and resorted to ad hominem & bullshit.
Live feed from 2bhammered webcam |

Zeomebuch Nova
Metalworks
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 03:55:00 -
[128] - Quote
2bhammered wrote: How do you survive in today's society?
Just like i did back in the 80's and 90's.
My two questions though, are still unanswered (reminder in case you want to answer them).
For the rest, I didn't want and i wont get involved in any cheap media discussion. |

Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
385
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:19:00 -
[129] - Quote
There was an issue with parsing this post's BBCode |

Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
385
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 04:21:00 -
[130] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Oh boy, are we getting desperate now?  It is talking about UK sales on one chart at one retailer but "they don't have exact figures"      Go to bed Tyran, you are like not even trying anymore... PS: Mass Effect 3 was not even being sold in GAME's shops.
That's because GAME's shops are on the brink of complete and total failure, not because Mass Effect 3 is a bad game. Or in other words, GAME isn't refusing to sell Mass Effect 3 - EA (and many other suppliers) are refusing to do business with GAME. GAME's shares dropped 66 percent a few days ago because of this. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:05:00 -
[131] - Quote
Taedrin wrote:2bhammered wrote:Oh boy, are we getting desperate now?  It is talking about UK sales on one chart at one retailer but "they don't have exact figures"      Go to bed Tyran, you are like not even trying anymore... PS: Mass Effect 3 was not even being sold in GAME's shops. That's because GAME's shops are on the brink of complete and total failure, not because Mass Effect 3 is a bad game. Or in other words, GAME isn't refusing to sell Mass Effect 3 - EA (and many other suppliers) are refusing to do business with GAME. GAME's shares dropped 66 percent a few days ago because of this.
My point is, if the biggest retail store is not stocking your game it will be quite difficult to sell it. Fact is GAME was UK's biggest game retailer, again there is no data whatsoever other than the bullshit Tyran linked to that says otherwise.
ME3 has so far not sold more copies than ME1, it is also not on STEAM like ME1 was. Until hard data changes that, ME3 is the worst selling ME game.
But thanks for your insight into GAME's financials, trust me I was already aware of them. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:07:00 -
[132] - Quote
Zeomebuch Nova wrote:2bhammered wrote: How do you survive in today's society?
Just like i did back in the 80's and 90's. My two questions though, are still unanswered (reminder in case you want to answer them). For the rest, I didn't want and i wont get involved in any cheap media discussion.
No, your questions were answered, in the first post starting this thread, the OP. Even a nice EVE citizen pointed that out to you, by the way, you were born in the 90's? |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:12:00 -
[133] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:2bhammered wrote:Jhagiti Tyran wrote:"I couldn't care less about SWTOR..." Oh, really?  /posted in thread "SWToR Just hit the iceberg=Tortanic!" Selective quoting at its finest, you derailed the thread with your rant about ME3. Nice to see how you conceded the argument and resorted to ad hominem & bullshit. Live feed from 2bhammered webcam
Selective? You did say what I quoted, even in the context and out of context it had that meaning, that you indeed care so much that you have been posting in this thread since its inception
Thanks for using the same picture twice to try and diss me, nice picture too, think I first saw it on 4chan 5 years ago
Now with so much excitement I can barely contain myself, I have to admit I am most intrigued to see what you will come up with next! |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
237
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:41:00 -
[134] - Quote
Still not figured out how the how edit button works huh? Your shiptoasting always seems to start at the weekend, they must let you off the shortbus then.
P.S.
The data's been posted, face it you are wrong. So suck it up and come up with another dead horse to flog.
P.P.S
4 chan, that explains a lot. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
77
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 03:54:00 -
[135] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:Still not figured out how the how edit button works huh? Your shiptoasting always seems to start at the weekend, they must let you off the shortbus then.
? 
Jhagiti Tyran wrote: P.S.
The data's been posted, face it you are wrong. So suck it up and come up with another dead horse to flog.
No you posted no data, you still have yet to post any data at all. I checked your link, it contained ZERO data.
Jhagiti Tyran wrote: P.P.S
4 chan, that explains a lot.
Explains what exactly? I enjoy 4chan sometimes, I guess you do not?
Anyway, last data by Bioware themselves still only talk about the 3+ million shipped units, so until they sell all those it is not even beating mass effect 1. But again, I doubt it will ever sell that much, ME2 sold 2.1 million, estimates of ME3 are at 1.9 million. Sure it can surpass ME2 but ME1 was at 2.5 so quite a bit to go, even if they do sell 3 million I doubt it would make up for all overhead and other expenses, at best direct costs and R&D.
ME2 by the way got a position 39 at console charts software sales of 2010. Games like Fable 3, just dance and Wii party beat it by a landslide, Wii fit + killed it and even Halo reach sold more than 3 times as much.
http://www.google.com/finance?cid=168725 it will only get worse now that they have released their 2 biggest investments.
Anyway, I look yet again forward to your new pathetic attempt at trolling. I suppose it matters a lot to you that ME3 should be a success, it isn't and you think it is because EA and Bioware said so, that is the nature of PR you see. |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
241
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 05:05:00 -
[136] - Quote
The "investor" is back lol. |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3598
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 14:36:00 -
[137] - Quote
So where they at now?
|

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 14:42:00 -
[138] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:So where they at now?
http://www.torstatus.net/shards/us/trends
Dead?!  |

Kattshiro
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 15:31:00 -
[139] - Quote
Kinda obsessed? Like into the way too much zone... According to those total population peak between all servers on any given day is nearly 300kish? Which an MMO population declining way after release is quite normal. And then leveling out.
Matter of fact most pay MMO's have seen a decline in sub numbers in the last 1-2 years. Even eve. Could be that people are just tired of the model and gameplay. Also take into consideration of time of year v. sales, and subs.
SWOTOR anit going to be the end all be all, but only fools/fanbois thought that... Also people that didnt read the previews before its release. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 15:57:00 -
[140] - Quote
Kattshiro wrote:Kinda obsessed? Like into the way too much zone... According to those total population peak between all servers on any given day is nearly 300kish? Which an MMO population declining way after release is quite normal. And then leveling out.
Matter of fact most pay MMO's have seen a decline in sub numbers in the last 1-2 years. Even eve. Could be that people are just tired of the model and gameplay. Also take into consideration of time of year v. sales, and subs.
SWOTOR anit going to be the end all be all, but only fools/fanbois thought that... Also people that didnt read the previews before its release.
"Into the way too much zone"! 
Peak is not 300k, in fact, no one but EA knows the number behind light, standard and heavy etc. We can only speculate and by my own attempts at that I reach 150k-200k on a weekend.
EA themselves before release have stated that in order to make profit they need 1 million subscribers, 500k to possibly break even according to another quote over a period of at least a year. Which makes sense take all things into account like paying 35% of all profit to Lucas Arts, opening new studio, staff, outsourcing, estimates of 300 million USD R&D and operating costs etc.
Has many MMO games seen a decline in general? They sure have, After Tera no major MMORPG will be released with a subscription model we are all so used to. I believe THQ announced this week they have even changed their upcoming Warhammer 40k MMO to be a singleplayer game with multi-player options and DLC.
As for believing the game was going to be end all be all or the very least end of WoW a lot of people believed that. You say people did not read previews? Hardly, even every single review was favorable, almost every single gaming publication, mainstream publication and website gave that game top scores. Which just shows how broken gaming journalism is or more like the fact that they are just a part of the publishers PR division. But that is another discussion altogether about how even Metacritic, owned by CBS interactive and, let's leave it at that
Also the fact that it was the most expensive MMORPG developed since WoW and it was made by Bioware (who at the time was at least a respected developer) with EA second? worlds biggest video-game publisher. At least we all thought the game would be playable, but of course Warhammer Online should have been enough of a warning sign.
SWTOR is dead and obsessed or not what we can look forward to next will be a Mass Effect MMORPG and hype. All one can hope is that people remember the saying, "fool me once shame on you and fool me twice shame on me". But then again, EA has managed to survive since the 80's... |

VKhaun Vex
Viziam Amarr Empire
314
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 16:04:00 -
[141] - Quote
/page
How is this thread still on the front page? We KNOW 2bhammered is a troll, and we KNOW how MMO population works.
Hell I'm playing City of Heroes again, which would give it's left super-nutt for a percentage point of SWTOR's population, and it's still not 'dead' by any means. I can log on and get a group any time I want, even at the odd hours I play.
Let 2bhammered have the last word and let her stupid thread die. *Charges Twilight fans with Ka-bar* -Surfin's PlunderBunny LIIIIIIIIIIINNEEEEE PIIIEEEECCCCEEE!!!!!!! -Taedrin Using relativity to irrational numbers is smart -rodyas I no longer believe we landed on the moon. -Atticus Fynch
|

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 16:16:00 -
[142] - Quote
VKhaun Vex wrote:/page
How is this thread still on the front page? We KNOW 2bhammered is a troll, and we KNOW how MMO population works.
Hell I'm playing City of Heroes again, which would give it's left super-nutt for a percentage point of SWTOR's population, and it's still not 'dead' by any means. I can log on and get a group any time I want, even at the odd hours I play.
Let 2bhammered have the last word and let her stupid thread die.
/thread
"Naddist Rebels are both sitting at ~2 people online."
"Fatman Hutta/Korriban are both sitting at ~29 people online."
"I'm on Kain-Kan (EU)
There are 7 ppl online at the moment"
"On nadds sarcophagus I have 3 rep's 1 imp"
These are quotes on the official swtor site taken in a matter of seconds.
You mention city of heroes? That is a game that went F2P am I right due to its failure as a subscription based game? SWTOR can go F2P as well but even doing so it will never be able to make a return on its investment.
As for why this is still on the front page? Well, don't blame me, you yourself just bumped it did you not?
I think the reason you get so angry and lash out at me and undoubtedly others pointing out the fact that SWTOR is dead on every single social media is because you are still playing it. You are acting out due to your emotional investment into the game and brand.
It is the definition of a fan, fanatic and it is not pretty to look at.
PS: I'm not the troll here
"WoW has had close to ten years of development, so you're not competing with brown-box WoW," explained Brack. "You're competing with WoW today, which has a Dungeon Finder, now it has a Raid Finder, and soon will have scenarios. It's got all these other features for helping matchmaker and group and have battlegrounds and all this stuff that didn't exist on day one, but now it's hard to imagine the game without it. Going back and trying to form a group by talking in various party chats to get the group together in Star Wars feels very retro and very painful these days."
From Blizzard with love on the first page of swtor.com forums. |

Kattshiro
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 16:46:00 -
[143] - Quote
I never played it... I just wonder the obsession with the desire for it to "fail" or not succeed... Once again I don't care how a game I don't play success impacts me in the least bit. There's an honest curiosity on your infatuation.
Seriously I don't get it...
I don't know about the numbers, but I did read a few weeks ago released sub numbers, and profitability. Given it's a public company it would be illegal to fudge those. I mean you released the website showing the graphs of # of players on total servers per day then tell me those are inaccurate.... Well why the hell did you link them in the first place?
Could I be wrong? Absolutely! But I doubt EA would lie on a quarterly report...(illegal) and i'm only going off the numbers you yourself linked.
And I did read previews on IGN, gamespy, gamespot. That stated to the effect: "it's your standard MMO with a starwars theme. It's not bad, but it's not new."
Perhaps we read different sites, but they did have more than 1 preview on each stating as much... Which is why I never looked to buy or play it. I already have/did. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 17:18:00 -
[144] - Quote
Kattshiro wrote:I never played it... I just wonder the obsession with the desire for it to "fail" or not succeed... Once again I don't care how a game I don't play success impacts me in the least bit. There's an honest curiosity on your infatuation.
Seriously I don't get it...
I don't know about the numbers, but I did read a few weeks ago released sub numbers, and profitability. Given it's a public company it would be illegal to fudge those. I mean you released the website showing the graphs of # of players on total servers per day then tell me those are inaccurate.... Well why the hell did you link them in the first place?
Could I be wrong? Absolutely! But I doubt EA would lie on a quarterly report...(illegal) and i'm only going off the numbers you yourself linked.
And I did read previews on IGN, gamespy, gamespot. That stated to the effect: "it's your standard MMO with a starwars theme. It's not bad, but it's not new."
Perhaps we read different sites, but they did have more than 1 preview on each stating as much... Which is why I never looked to buy or play it. I already have/did.
A few weeks ago? Those numbers are from end of previous quarter and does not extend after first month. Perhaps you read someone quoting old figures or the ones they stated during the guild convention which turned out to be same data quoted again but this time for fans. That is not illegal.
The website I gave you covers trends in status of servers, light, standard or heavy etc. So they are correct in terms of showing that, then we can only speculate how many people does "light/green" mean. A light can have 1 person or it can have 100. We know at launch 1.7 million people made accounts, then we can look at server stats then and now.
I know when I played the game first month at launch my server saying very heavy/full never had more than 2000 players. Today that server is light.
EA did not "lie" in their report, they said the number of sold meaning shipped copies and accounts created 1.7 million. They also admitted "some" are still in their free month and that "most" have payed for another month of subscription. That is what companies do, feel free to define those terms legally, for the record, they made exactly same statements about Warhammer Online and it turned out "most" meant 300k out of 1,5 million I believe. PR is PR, when EA say they have sold 3,4 million copies of Mass Effect it means shipped and we could discuss this for hours but needless to say, they have not broken any laws in USA or no one is willing to sue them or file charges and if you read their statements again I am sure you can spot the BS.
If their numbers were as good as their PR releases their shares would not be dropping the way they are. EA even pulled a THQ and are now cutting back on amount of games they are developing and publishing by a great amount.
As for previews, yet again, you would be amazed to know that IGN works indirectly with EA and Bioware? Actually they even went as far as helping to make a "fan video" for the game, what was their review score I am curious. But I digress, IGN is owned by News Corp and so forth...
Please give me a link or 2of these previews linked with their final review. Use metacritic if you want and find me an example, I would love to see it.
In any case, a lot of people me included knew it would be close or even exactly the same as WoW but in space and Star Wars. What we did not know was that it would be broken, terrible and worse than WoW 5 years ago. Most of us were in for a shock when we saw a game of this magnitude in such a terrible state after all that money and time spent making it.
I do go into a lot greater detail about the numbers and issues with SWTOR in this thread and what I just said now to answer your questions is something I have restated several times in this thread but I see that it never gets old questioning this.
I welcome your reply, but as for your obsessions with wondering about the obsession about the state of SWTOR... I welcome you to first read my OP and the disclaimer, I also recommend to always read an OP in threads you comment on. Perhaps make a new thread and ask the question about peoples obsessional interest about games success or failures. |

Kattshiro
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 17:29:00 -
[145] - Quote
You want me to link a preview that said swotor was nothing special? From a website you claim works for EA? That doesn't make your point...Rather the opposite.
Here's the gist. http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/bioware-mmo-project/index_articles.html
Some IGN linked in there as well. |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 17:37:00 -
[146] - Quote
http://pc.ign.com/objects/816/816935.html
9.0 editors choice award
http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/bioware-mmo-project/1215744p2.html
TOR MMORPG of the year award 4/5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ppn89Nc29PQ
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Electronic+Arts+Announces+Agreement+to+Acquire+News+Corp.+Online+Game...-a057743298
"We're excited to be a strategic partner in Electronic Arts' new online endeavor," said James Murdoch, Executive Vice President of News Corporation. "We're confident the development strengths of Kesmai will greatly contribute to EA's future as a leader in the online entertainment market."
which is a small part of their collaboration in investments.
This is not illegal, it is how business works. Same thing with metacritic and gameranking being owned by CBS interactive subsidiary of CBS corporation that also owns gamespot, giantbomb and a lotof other sites.
News Corp owns IGN, gamespy, 1up and a ton of other websites and publications not to mention Fox. |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3600
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 18:31:00 -
[147] - Quote
http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/6752/1326091391143.jpg found this amusing.
|

Kattshiro
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 21:01:00 -
[148] - Quote
I said previews not reviews. Somewhere in that stack I remember various editors saying it's the same ole song and dance...just polished.
Read some of the actual content of those reviews and they same the same as well. Which is why if you listen to podcasts done by those same site the reviews say they hate scores...because people don't equate the substance with them. (They also say on the podcasts...some of which were really funny that swotor was nothing new.)
Also reviews are just opinions... not facts. They also may not experience the bugs. I know I bought a total war game and it was ****** up. The reviewers came out with a later article saying im sorry but we didn't experience those bugs. Which truth be told can happen on PC given the hardware diff.
But eh good luck to swotor rails MMO's aren't my thing. |

Drachiel
Mercury LLC
10
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 01:20:00 -
[149] - Quote
VKhaun Vex wrote:/page
How is this thread still on the front page? We KNOW 2bhammered is a troll, and we KNOW how MMO population works.
Hell I'm playing City of Heroes again, which would give it's left super-nutt for a percentage point of SWTOR's population, and it's still not 'dead' by any means. I can log on and get a group any time I want, even at the odd hours I play.
Let 2bhammered have the last word and let her stupid thread die.
But City of Heroes was actually a decent game. SWTOR is a less enjoyable World of Warcraft with less content and lightsabers. |

Shameless Avenger
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 05:55:00 -
[150] - Quote
I don't think games just die. Even Unreal Tournament which is very old, still has some servers up and running. |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
2420
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 06:06:00 -
[151] - Quote
Games do die. It's just that the death scenes can drag on for years and the fallen corpse has a tendency to twich quite a bit. |

Drachiel
Mercury LLC
10
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 13:21:00 -
[152] - Quote
Shameless Avenger wrote:I don't think games just die. Even Unreal Tournament which is very old, still has some servers up and running.
UT has redeeming qualities.
SWTOR does not. |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
2534
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 06:29:00 -
[153] - Quote
Looks like the downward trend of subs has finally gotten the publisher to react. SWtoR is going F2P. From full sub WoW killer to F2P within the first year. That's a solid flop in my book  |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
571
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 07:02:00 -
[154] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Looks like the downward trend of subs has finally gotten the publisher to react. SWtoR is going F2P. From full sub WoW killer to Pay-to-Win within the first year. That's a solid flop in my book 
Fixed, but, truth.
The lifelong StarWars fan in me -- as in: first run in theatres -- cannot help but haz a sad at this, though.
Still and all,
A) Is this surprising? Is it, really? B) There might just be, as it were...well, A New Hope(TM) on the horizon.
Why am I dreaming of some strange woman who keeps telling me, "You fail at life because you are cloaked?" |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8850
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 07:30:00 -
[155] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Looks like the downward trend of subs has finally gotten the publisher to react. SWtoR is going F2P. From full sub WoW killer to F2P within the first year. That's a solid flop in my book  I suppose it's a flop in terms of RoI, but it's also fully in line with what one might expect. They overestimated the draw of an IP that's already on death watch; they picked a content design that has proven very high-maintenance; and they picked a progression track that catered toGǪ ehmGǪ those of shorter attention spans. Not the recipe for high-investment/long-return yumminess.
All in all, it follows the general trend of converging with non-massive online games: more and more game offer some kind of progression and persistence in the form of stats tracking and achievements, and they are designed to be replaced by the 20XX version a year or two later. The question is which caused which, and what is the direction of the reinforcement cycle: did games teach players to expect the N+1 version in a year and to not get all that invested, or is that just a result of online gaming becoming more mainstream, so the expectations were there all along and the game have only now started to cater to them?
Then again, one might question how GÇÿmassiveGÇÖ recent MMOs really are. Maybe that's part of it: what's the point of setting up these large persistent shards when the actual gameplay doesn't leverage those numbers? Are the MMO producers setting themselves up for failure by incurring far larger costs than their games really warrant or require? Will the modern MMO become more like the modern FPSes: a two-year fix for small(ish) groups until the next version comes out with some updated graphics and more over-the-top plots, only these games are built around stats-selection and co-op rather than weapon-selection and shooting other players. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
575
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 11:03:00 -
[156] - Quote
Tippia wrote:[...] Will the modern MMO become more like the modern FPSes: a two-year fix for small(ish) groups until the next version comes out with some updated graphics and more over-the-top plots, only these games are built around stats-selection and co-op rather than weapon-selection and shooting other players.
Oh, Gods, how horrid.
I certainly hope not, but gamers in general, compared to even 4-5 years ago are just shallow, immature, and...well...stupid.
No two ways around it.
Thank the Mother of All Gods for EVE-O, warts, ::CCP::, and all.
Above and Beyond Technologies' (IIRC?) The Repopulation is one to keep an eye on, IMHO, as well as hoping/dreaming/praying that Infinity: Quest or Earth ever gets beyond vapourware.
Why am I dreaming of some strange woman who keeps telling me, "You fail at life because you are cloaked?" |

Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
579
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 13:32:00 -
[157] - Quote
Oh for the love that is everything holy who in the living hell drug this cesspool up? For weeks this cancer ridden bus wrecked burn victim of a thread haunted the front page because the idiot child of a poster kept rebumping it with their logic of sloth. It took so long to lay this to rest and now one of you evil sons of bitches necro'd the unholy beast. There is a special place in hell for you. |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
577
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 14:21:00 -
[158] - Quote
Ohaidere!
I are kyute kitten! Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

Louis deGuerre
The Dark Tribe Against ALL Authorities
421
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 14:26:00 -
[159] - Quote
I have some die hard SWTOR players in the office here and the mutual consensus seem to be : Meh who cares  FIRE FRIENDSHIP TORPEDOES ! Louis's epic skill guide v1.1 |

Jim Era
The Syndicate Inc En Garde
27
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 14:26:00 -
[160] - Quote
star wars has expired. its over. deal with it stop trying to make more star wars things (besides legos because they're cewl) |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
578
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 01:28:00 -
[161] - Quote
Jim Era wrote:star wars has expired. its over. deal with it stop trying to make more star wars things (besides legos because they're cewl)
Don't forget the Ryan v. Dork-man videos!
Meta-gaming for carebears:
Whine on the forums like a little ***** until CCP gets sick of you and hands you everything you ask for just to shut you up. |

Arkturus McFadden
Sonoran Shadow Black Mesa Complex
153
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 05:13:00 -
[162] - Quote
Really hits me that this game isn't going to make it.
I followed it for four years, made an RP group and we basically waited all that time..
Then when it finally released we played till February and ultimately we all just said.. yeah.. this isn't pre-cu SWG..
..and left.
Such a tragic end to a Star Wars game..hopefully one day we'll see the rise of truly amazing Star Wars games again.
Tie Fighter? Jedi Knight Series? Battlefront?
... hell even a rehash of SWG?
One can only dream.
|

pussnheels
503
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 09:11:00 -
[163] - Quote
next MMO that is going to fail will be TES online ( the elders scroll) , sure they still working on it and willbe a long while before it comes out, but looks like it will be another WoWclone and will probably dissapoint its longtime hardcore fans of the series , including me
Sadly i just got myself banned from their forums for saying that 95 % of all console games are kiddies games damn kids and their xbox I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Pix Severus
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
104
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 12:21:00 -
[164] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:next MMO that is going to fail will be TES online ( the elders scroll) , sure they still working on it and willbe a long while before it comes out, but looks like it will be another WoWclone and will probably dissapoint its longtime hardcore fans of the series , including me
I'm also expecting a huge disappointment for the Elder Scrolls MMO. It's such a shame to see the series ruined by what will undoubetdly be yet another failed WoW clone. I wish these people would realise that copying WoW = failure, can't they see the trend?
If people want to play WoW, they'll play WoW, it has lots of players already there, and the game has been polished over many years. Why should they go play some clone of it, just because it has a different name? |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
4378
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 13:23:00 -
[165] - Quote
Arkturus McFadden wrote:Really hits me that this game isn't going to make it.
I followed it for four years, made an RP group and we basically waited all that time..
Then when it finally released we played till February and ultimately we all just said.. yeah.. this isn't pre-cu SWG..
..and left.
Such a tragic end to a Star Wars game..hopefully one day we'll see the rise of truly amazing Star Wars games again.
Tie Fighter? Jedi Knight Series? Battlefront?
... hell even a rehash of SWG?
One can only dream.
Why were you expecting anything like SWG? Bioware were very open about what kind of experience they were aiming for. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
579
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 14:17:00 -
[166] - Quote
Pix Severus wrote:pussnheels wrote:next MMO that is going to fail will be TES online ( the elders scroll) , sure they still working on it and willbe a long while before it comes out, but looks like it will be another WoWclone and will probably dissapoint its longtime hardcore fans of the series , including me I'm also expecting a huge disappointment for the Elder Scrolls MMO. It's such a shame to see the series ruined by what will undoubetdly be yet another failed WoW clone. I wish these people would realise that copying WoW = failure, can't they see the trend? If people want to play WoW, they'll play WoW, it has lots of players already there, and the game has been polished over many years. Why should they go play some clone of it, just because it has a different name?
I have to agree with this as well. As soon as they released their plans for the game I took one look and logged off. I was hoping for something more along the lines of Skyrim Online. Get rid of usual class system and let people build a character on skills like we have here (major win for ccp).
And outside of that I have had other ideas for games like bringing back player built strongholds on the open world, more variance in character selection (Fantasy, FF variance of character models), and a stronger player influence (economy and politics) rather than turn the game into raid grind online. I want to see people actually fight for resources, actually work together to defend a keep, send out raids on little convoys, put the content in the players hands. |

Darius Brinn
Iberians Iberians.
76
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 10:33:00 -
[167] - Quote
As a former WoW player, some times I get the urge to install and play something similar.
I tried Age of Conan, D&D online, Lord of the Rings online, and a few others.
None of them caught my attention at all.
Last week I downloaded the free trial of SWTOR, having been a die hard SW fan since the early 80's.
Honestly, I couldn't endure it past level 10 of my only character, a Sith Warrior. I reached the Sith fleet, turned him into a Sith Juggernaut and uninstalled it.
The story was NOT as compelling as it had been mentioned to me. The graphics were dissapointing in a computer that can run Skyrim at very high settings, and 90% of the Sith Warrior skills are directly copied from my old Prot Warrior in WoW.
It didn't feel in any way like KOTOR or other Bioware RPGs (which I absolutely adore).
No redeeming factors whatsoever. Bland and generic gameplay, and overall dissapointing.
And the problem is that they DON'T understand that WoW being 10 years old doesn't matter ONE BIT. You cannot compare a game you want to charge money for NOW with its competition FROM THE PAST.
If you are to release a WoW clone, at the very least make sure it has ALL the features WoW has now. I can see SWTOR couldn't wait until the devs implemented 15 raids, but for the love of god, there is NO excuse not to have a group finder or double talent trees at launch.
|

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
2539
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 12:30:00 -
[168] - Quote
Now that I've actually looked at the F2P /sub comparison chart they're going for I'm a bit perplexed. It's a hybrid model like in LoTRO, with some differences, but I'm not sure how they plan on making money of it. You get all the story content for free, which is arguably the only redeeming quality of the game. The problem is, that if you get that for free, why would you pay for anything outside vanity options? Naturally there are some limitations, but they are in areas, that aren't considered good or are only minor inconveniences.
From what I've read and been told the game has no economy and crafting isn't a strong point either. Leveling is also fast, character creator is one of the weakest in recent years and all the alien races are just retextured humans. It just seems, that the advantages you get from paying for anything, as the game currently is, are non-existant. You have to pay to regularly access the multiplayer aspects, but that is done better by almost every competitor they have. It just seems weird to me, that you give the only strong content you have for free, while trying to make money on the content, that is the weakest.
The vanity market might be strong, since some of the current art style of clothing/armor is hated by the players. I'm sure stuff like black lightsaber blades and other lightsaber crystals will also sell quite nicely. It'll look awful and increasingly less and less like starwars or a coherent universe stylisticly, but it'll sell. I just don't think that's enough and they'll have to heavily rework the game or introduce P2W to get people to spend money.
|

Rashmika Clavain
Shadows Of The Federation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
15
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 14:59:00 -
[169] - Quote
TL:DR?
ToR could've been spectacular.
Too much develpment focus in unecessary areas.
EA probably hamstrung it.
F2P within a year.
 |

Tian Jade
Bad Bumblebee Incorporated
13
|
Posted - 2012.08.03 22:47:00 -
[170] - Quote
The problem was probably not EA but Bioware being inexperienced in the MMORPG business.
For a entertainment park RPG it was not enough like WoW, meaning there was not enough endgame content after players had burned through the level content to get to max level as fast as possible.
The level content with it's fully voiced over multiple choice dungeons is one of high maintenance. Meaning Bioware cannot just easily reskin a few NPC fiddle a bit with their toolset and then throw out new flashpoints every few weeks.
The people enjoying sandbox MMO and Sci Fi games were probably turned away by the fact that the game gives only an illusion of choice, with no real freedom on how to progress. Also the tunnel shooter they put in and labeled space combat turned away a lot of fans who might still have enjoyed the game. Besides the game is called star wars and the movies were never only about light sabers and the force, but also about epic space battles and at that point Bioware also failed. |

NeoShocker
Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.
130
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 02:33:00 -
[171] - Quote
Heh, glad I saved about 400+ dollars from not buying those games (400+ steam games mind you) because I knew they (SWTOR, WHO, Conan, etc) won't appeal to me in a long run, unlike Ragnarok Online (4 years) and Eve-Online (6 years and counting).
Good thing I made a vow to never try another "hack and slash" games after RO unless it REALLY appealed to me. Only WoW lasted me about a year, no other games got close (usually 2 weeks or less). As soon as I reached my first max level after Wraith of the Lich King expansion came out, I immediately quit the game. The thought of doing long hours of raiding for good gear ...
|

Astenion
Nephilim Coalition Zombie Ninja Space Bears
160
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 22:22:00 -
[172] - Quote
It's really sad. I played until recently, and although I enjoy the game, if it weren't SW I wouldn't play it. When I came to that realization it just kinda bummed me out. There's no endgame to SWTOR and content is few and far between. I enjoyed the first couple of characters I leveled up to 50, but after that it's just a grind.
Ah well. Still got mah good ole trusty Eve. |

SpaceSquirrels
284
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 22:35:00 -
[173] - Quote
LOL I do remember reading previews, and the author, and from what I garnered from the info that it was the same old song and dance with star wars in the title.
And damn did I ever catch flak for saying that. But honestly how many out of the dozens of starwars games that are released are spectacular games? 10%? Now add that to dated MMO mechanics, and pay model. What did you think was going to happen?
Granted most MMO's these days seem to have a substantial release then bottom out, and then find a loyal albeit small player base.
Furthermore the definition for measure of success in MMO's me thinks is changing. |

Elias Greyhand
Potentially Irresponsible
7
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 22:36:00 -
[174] - Quote
Micheal Dietrich wrote:Pix Severus wrote:pussnheels wrote:next MMO that is going to fail will be TES online ( the elders scroll) , sure they still working on it and willbe a long while before it comes out, but looks like it will be another WoWclone and will probably dissapoint its longtime hardcore fans of the series , including me I'm also expecting a huge disappointment for the Elder Scrolls MMO. It's such a shame to see the series ruined by what will undoubetdly be yet another failed WoW clone. I wish these people would realise that copying WoW = failure, can't they see the trend? If people want to play WoW, they'll play WoW, it has lots of players already there, and the game has been polished over many years. Why should they go play some clone of it, just because it has a different name? I have to agree with this as well. As soon as they released their plans for the game I took one look and logged off. I was hoping for something more along the lines of Skyrim Online. Get rid of usual class system and let people build a character on skills like we have here (major win for ccp).
Like a lot of games concepts these days, as I soon as I heard TES MMO I died a little bit more inside. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |