| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
|

CCP Wrangler
C C P

|
Posted - 2008.04.08 12:27:00 -
[1]
Our very own Customer Service team has written a blog to inform you all about the Secure ETC Trading System and why it should be used. They+re also informing you of some things you might not have been aware of when it comes to Real Money Trading (RMT) like the fact the people you buy from will steal your credit card information if they get the chance, and ISK sellers are also behind macro mining and other things none of us wish to see in EVE. Pleas read Real Money Trade is bad, mkay? to get the full story!
Wrangler Community Manager CCP Games, EVE Online Email / Netfang
Hug-A-Wrangler! FanFest 2008
"The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it." |
|

clone 1
Laughing Leprechauns Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 13:02:00 -
[2]
Just like eon and eve-pirate adds on the EVE client login, this devblog should be advertised at logon too. Ignorance is not an excuse, but it is a factor when people want to buy isk. Education is a good weapon against RMT.
-------------------------------------------------- The Angels Have the Phone Box |

SillyWaif
Galactic Kingdom
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 13:13:00 -
[3]
Quote: There are also the macro miners and mission runners, complex farmers and assorted rabble of this sort that causes general nuisance ...
I like running missions and I take offence if you compare/associate me(/our corp/other players who like that kind of gameplay) with Real Money Trading. It's annoying enough to see the spam for it in local, without this particular sentence in a Dev Blog...
|

Bartholomeus Crane
Estrale Frontiers
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 13:20:00 -
[4]
I'm somewhat offended to be called assorted rabble simply because I like doing the PvE content of EvE!
Surely this can't be what you mean?
If not, an apology would be appropriate ... -- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? |

Mereden
Ceptacemia Fallout Project
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 13:23:00 -
[5]
Um, I read it as macro miners and (macro) mission runners. I don't think CCP are likely to be slamming people for using the content they created 
|

Miranda Duvall
Khaos Tech
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 13:24:00 -
[6]
Originally by: SillyWaif
Quote: There are also the macro miners and mission runners, complex farmers and assorted rabble of this sort that causes general nuisance ...
I like running missions and I take offence if you compare/associate me(/our corp/other players who like that kind of gameplay) with Real Money Trading. It's annoying enough to see the spam for it in local, without this particular sentence in a Dev Blog...
I assume they mean to say macro miners and MACRO mission runners (yes they do exist!).
My Skills -Invention HowTo |
|

GM Grimmi
Game Masters

|
Posted - 2008.04.08 13:25:00 -
[7]
Edited by: GM Grimmi on 08/04/2008 13:25:52 Hi,
Macro-mission runners is exactly what I mean. Sorry for the mix-up :)
GM Grimmi
Lead Game Master
EVE CSS |
|

Silverace
Perkone
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 13:30:00 -
[8]
Education about rules, policy and the EULA can only achieve so much.
Man is greedy, few things are stronger than the desire for gold, and the only thing that will have real effect is how much illegally purchased isk CCP removes daily.
What is needed is more cleaver algorithms for finding transaction patterns and patterns in gameplay that may indicate isk farming.
Quote: we remove tens of billions of illegally purchased ISK every day.
This, is ultimately the only measure of real effect.
|

Nisse Owned
The Order of Chivalry Nex Eternus
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 13:50:00 -
[9]
Good seeing that you still care about the spam, unlike some people *caugh* sony *caugh* blizzard 
|

Izo Azlion
Ataraxia.
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 13:56:00 -
[10]
Well said to be honest. There shouldnt be a market for this, if the GTC option is available.
Izo Azlion.
---
|

Hamfast
Lightfoot Industries
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 13:58:00 -
[11]
I am glad to hear you are taking steps to stop the RMT by not only punishing those you catch buying ISK, but by the mass banning of the farmers and macros that are collecting the ISK...
you are banning them aren't you? --------*****--------
Learn and be informed, because a Politicians worst nightmare is an informed voter...
So choose your CSM Candidates wisely
|

Kayscha
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 14:07:00 -
[12]
This just offers RMTers a safe loophole at slightly reduced profits and requiring an extra step, selling time cards for cash at a discount. CCP gains in the short run by saturating this intermediate market with its 'currency', namely time cards. Players might profit in the long run by effectively having reduced monthly costs for playing, possibly with the futher incentive to have more players willing to spend those reduced fees, increasing EVE player base.
Is this worth the trade-off? I don't know. What I object to is the fact that CCP will not state the issue as it clearly is.
Damn this board, BTW, had a really good answer typed and I just got a blank screen and all my hard work gone :(
|

Zetjur Jilnou
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 14:11:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Zetjur Jilnou on 08/04/2008 14:11:35
Originally by: Kayscha This just offers RMTers a safe loophole at slightly reduced profits and requiring an extra step, selling time cards for cash at a discount. CCP gains in the short run by saturating this intermediate market with its 'currency', namely time cards. Players might profit in the long run by effectively having reduced monthly costs for playing, possibly with the futher incentive to have more players willing to spend those reduced fees, increasing EVE player base.
Is this worth the trade-off? I don't know. What I object to is the fact that CCP will not state the issue as it clearly is.
Damn this board, BTW, had a really good answer typed and I just got a blank screen and all my hard work gone :(
If you can't completely prevent RMT, what's so bad about having RMT in a way that stops most of the negative aspects - the farming, the hacking and so on?
|

DrAtomic
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 14:11:00 -
[14]
Update your documentation at https://secure.eve-online.com/SecSellEtcFaq.aspx it is misleading your customers and has been requested but STILL NOT CORRECTED over here http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=598326&page=5:]http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=598326&page=5[/url]. You have GMs sanctioning people for non secure ETC trade being not allowed but state in the ETC FAQ on the ETC trade page that people are allowed to use non secure but at their own risk (regarding receiving isk and/or the isk being legit). - - -
Originally by: CCP Wrangler If you can understand our goal, disagree with our solution and offer a solution that is equal or better your opinion has a better chance of being heard...
|

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 14:46:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Akita T on 08/04/2008 14:46:14
This devblog's contents should become a "sticky" newspost on the login screen, a sticky in "New Players" and "General Discussions" too. I can not believe how many times I've had to write this exact same thing that the blog says to some generic moron of the moment.
P.S. And yes, please do correct the KB and FAQ on the "illegality" of non-secure GTC trade. 1|2|3|4|5. |

Belmarduk
de Prieure
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 14:48:00 -
[16]
This is what I really love about Eve and CCP - Zero-tolerance politics against RMT !!! The secure-system with ETC is really ingenious - It keeps the cash-flow controlled. If other games had the same policy/system they would have much less trouble with RMT and ingame-economics... Keep up the good work CCP ! Greetings Belmarduk
CCP Please give us casual players a Skill-Queue !
|

SillyWaif
Galactic Kingdom
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 14:48:00 -
[17]
Originally by: GM Grimmi Edited by: GM Grimmi on 08/04/2008 13:25:52 Hi,
Macro-mission runners is exactly what I mean. Sorry for the mix-up :)
Cheers for the clarification! 
|

Ki Anna
Ki Tech Industries
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 14:55:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Kayscha This just offers RMTers a safe loophole at slightly reduced profits and requiring an extra step, selling time cards for cash at a discount.
What loophole? Unless they can get those codes at a discount, they will run a loss.
The time code is used when traded via the secure method. Trades made outside of the secure method are treated in the same way as illegal RMT.
There is no loophole here that doesn't exist anywhere else. Some might argue that RMT sellers could arrange to buy GTC's from their clients at prices far above the market prices. However, this is no different than buying any in-game item at an obsurd price, and can be expected to be handled accordingly.
|

Horace Friendly
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 15:06:00 -
[19]
if you want people to always use the secure method and not have an excuse not to, include an option to not apply the code toward your time right away
i mean, what if i want to buy a timecode with isk at a discount/whatever and resell it to someone who doesn't know how much it should cost?
|

jbob2000
KIA Corp KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 15:12:00 -
[20]
I love how GM Grimmi thinks that people wont buy billions of isk with GTCs. Are you kidding? Half the titans out there were funded with GTCs. ________________________________
|

Ki Anna
Ki Tech Industries
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 15:14:00 -
[21]
Originally by: jbob2000 I love how GM Grimmi thinks that people wont buy billions of isk with GTCs. Are you kidding? Half the titans out there were funded with GTCs.
Grimmi's point was not that people can't do that, but that it comes at a cost: there is a reason that GTC prices have dropped to 150 mil. 
|

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 15:21:00 -
[22]
I am hoping that with subscription 2.0 the RMT trade will diminish even further
|

Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 15:27:00 -
[23]
I'll take things like this seriously when the ISK channel and EVEMail spam cease.
There's no reason CCP can't stop it entirely with a mere bayesian filter on chat and EVE mail, but they seem to think it's too hard, so don't even try.
If Google can do it for all of Gmail without perceivable slowdown of mail delivery, surely CCP can do it for a tiny fraction of the number of accounts and messages that comprises TQ.
I'm tired of the excuses. Reporting sellers is a waste of my time, they'll be back on a new account in less time than it takes me to report them. - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |

Illusori
Salvage and Mining Consortium Kingdom of Redemption
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 15:33:00 -
[24]
Quote: ...wallets will simply be put in the negative, making any form of market activity impossible, as well as preventing any actions that require ISK to be spent such as new clones or buying ship insurance.
Whilst this all sounds very good, what manner of appeals process is there for if someone has had this done to them and recieves no replies to petitions or attempts to find out why it has been done?
It's all well and good to wave a big stick, but if you clobber someone who you shouldn't have, there needs to be a clearly advertised means to appeal the decision, and handled in a timely manner if you're basically making the game unplayable for them!
|

xHalcyonx
Wreckless Abandon Un-Natural Selection
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 15:33:00 -
[25]
Must...Not...Resist...Urge...TO KILL FARMERS!  ------------------- ნỊs uʍop əpỊsdn Support the introduction of Blaze M crystals for Amarr! |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 15:53:00 -
[26]
You mean we don't have enough of these topics on the forums as it is? Or is this an attempt to collect all the replies in one thread?
I personally would like to hear something about the rest of the graphics updates, the rest of the overview updates, the dev's thoughts on changes to the POS warfare (however preliminary), some status on lag reducing measures(!!!), etc.
We're not getting any younger here... ...
|

Scilent Enigma
Vae Victis Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 15:57:00 -
[27]
Personally, I would really like it if the MOTD had something in the lines of this devblog when there is nothing more important to announce. Having "Buying ISK for real money IS against the EULA and will be punished appropriately" would be a good way to raise awareness of these problems.
Cudos to CCP for adding additional "behind the scenes" tracking mechanisms to help the RMT-hunters with this.
|
|

GM Krymus
Game Masters

|
Posted - 2008.04.08 16:13:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Xaen I'll take things like this seriously when the ISK channel and EVEMail spam cease.
There's no reason CCP can't stop it entirely with a mere bayesian filter on chat and EVE mail, but they seem to think it's too hard, so don't even try.
If Google can do it for all of Gmail without perceivable slowdown of mail delivery, surely CCP can do it for a tiny fraction of the number of accounts and messages that comprises TQ.
I'm tired of the excuses. Reporting sellers is a waste of my time, they'll be back on a new account in less time than it takes me to report them.
I completely understand your concerns with regards to this. You may or may not have noticed the dramatic reduction in spam since the deployment of Trinity 1.1, in which a large number of features (as mentioned in the dev blog) were introduced. I agree that if any spam is able to get through (which, unfortunately, some still does) then there is room for improvement. Please be assured that we will continue to work on developing tools to prevent spam from reaching players.
|
|
|

GM Faolchu
Game Masters

|
Posted - 2008.04.08 16:18:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Jonathan Calvert Perhaps if CCP would provide us with some proof that they were addressing the ISK sales and macro problems in EVE, we could give you more credibility on this matter?
IE, how much ISK have you appropriated, how many accts have you banned. Just give us some concrete examples to show us that you are aware of the problem, have a plan to deal with it, have taken stops to deal with, and have measurable progress.
While there has been some discussion to make such numbers and details of action taken public it is against our normal policy. We approach the matter silently and fight it as hard as we are allowed and hopefully that makes a difference.
We GM's always keep an eye on this particular part of EvE and we appreciate any input you players have to give us. |
|

Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 16:30:00 -
[30]
Originally by: GM Krymus
Originally by: Xaen I'll take things like this seriously when the ISK channel and EVEMail spam cease.
There's no reason CCP can't stop it entirely with a mere bayesian filter on chat and EVE mail, but they seem to think it's too hard, so don't even try.
If Google can do it for all of Gmail without perceivable slowdown of mail delivery, surely CCP can do it for a tiny fraction of the number of accounts and messages that comprises TQ.
I'm tired of the excuses. Reporting sellers is a waste of my time, they'll be back on a new account in less time than it takes me to report them.
I completely understand your concerns with regards to this. You may or may not have noticed the dramatic reduction in spam since the deployment of Trinity 1.1, in which a large number of features (as mentioned in the dev blog) were introduced. I agree that if any spam is able to get through (which, unfortunately, some still does) then there is room for improvement. Please be assured that we will continue to work on developing tools to prevent spam from reaching players.
I haven't noticed a difference.
My SAK alt is still pummeled every 30-90 seconds ISK ads in corp chat. And it's painfully obvious what they are. Price lists anyone?
And Xaen still gets 2-3 evemail spams a week, same as before.
Most of what I see is so obviously ISK spam that any halfassed bayesian filter would nail it in a heartbeat. But you're not using one.
Without giving away circumvention techniques, is there any way to describe what was actually done? I hope it wasn't some stopgap measure like banning accounts. That's like trying to fight a flood with a stick. - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |

Illusori
Salvage and Mining Consortium Kingdom of Redemption
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 16:56:00 -
[31]
Originally by: GM Guard Anyone who feels we have removed his ISK without reason is urged to file a petition so we can look into the matter. All petitions are looked into and replied to.
I'll pass that on to the person I know who is affected, however I believe he has had no response to any petitions in the past two weeks. Thanks for your quick reply to my post though. :)
Originally by: GM Krymus Please be assured that we will continue to work on developing tools to prevent spam from reaching players.
Any chance we could have one-click "report as spam" buttons on mails and in the right-click context-menu for chat? One that'll file a spam report with the content of the relevent message and any other information you need to take action?
Making it easier for us to report, and then for you to act on, than it is for the spammers to continue spamming is always good - the feeling that we as players are having to expend more effort than the spammers discourages people from feeling that there's any point in trying to help.
|

Galen Salkor
Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 17:05:00 -
[32]
So the purchasing of characters for real money doesn't fall under the topic of this devblog?
|
|

GM Faolchu
Game Masters

|
Posted - 2008.04.08 17:47:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Xaen My SAK alt is still pummeled every 30-90 seconds ISK ads in corp chat. And it's painfully obvious what they are. Price lists anyone?
I'll be spending the rest of my shift sitting in this channel, so far I haven't see anything but I'll keep an eye out. |
|

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 18:08:00 -
[34]
Originally by: GM Guard Edited by: GM Guard on 08/04/2008 16:06:36
Originally by: Illusori
Quote: ...wallets will simply be put in the negative, making any form of market activity impossible, as well as preventing any actions that require ISK to be spent such as new clones or buying ship insurance.
Whilst this all sounds very good, what manner of appeals process is there for if someone has had this done to them and recieves no replies to petitions or attempts to find out why it has been done?
It's all well and good to wave a big stick, but if you clobber someone who you shouldn't have, there needs to be a clearly advertised means to appeal the decision, and handled in a timely manner if you're basically making the game unplayable for them!
That's a good question actually.
Anyone who feels we have removed his ISK without reason is urged to file a petition so we can look into the matter. All petitions are looked into and replied to.
Please note that intentionally unverifiable explanations will not result in us returning ISK, whereas true stories are usually easy to verify in our experience. In other words, please file a petition if you truly received the ISK legitimately but don't bother if you bought it. There are penalties for filing intentionally false petitions and if your ISK came from an ISK seller there is no chance of misleading us into returning it.
I have heard a few tales of people selling stuff and then getting the transaction reversed. I of course cannot confirm how the isk was acquired, or if they are just making it up. for example one guy said that he sold a rattlesnake on contracts and then a while later had the isk removed from his wallet. which to me sounds very unfair even if it was to an isk seller or buyer. Or he was just making in up in which case I suggest throwing stuff at him 
Now I enjoy large isk transfers in the form of ransom. what happens when I ransom an isk buyer or seller? (note that I wouldn't ransom obvious farmers, like the 1000's of lowsec macro haulers, not that they would probably even respond to a ransom). Or take payment from a corp for system access?
|

SillyWaif
Galactic Kingdom
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 18:08:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Xaen
My SAK alt is still pummeled every 30-90 seconds ISK ads in corp chat. And it's painfully obvious what they are. Price lists anyone?
And Xaen still gets 2-3 evemail spams a week, same as before.
Maybe it's not an option you (want to) use: I have set my CSPA charge to 1 Mil ISK and after that the number spam mails have greatly reduced. I rarely get them these days, luckily. Intention was 'to make them pay' 
|

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 18:09:00 -
[36]
Originally by: GM Faolchu
Originally by: Xaen My SAK alt is still pummeled every 30-90 seconds ISK ads in corp chat. And it's painfully obvious what they are. Price lists anyone?
I'll be spending the rest of my shift sitting in this channel, so far I haven't see anything but I'll keep an eye out.
i would assume you can cover all rookie chats?
|

Tarminic
Forsaken Resistance The Last Stand
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 18:37:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Jonathan Calvert Perhaps if CCP would provide us with some proof that they were addressing the ISK sales and macro problems in EVE, we could give you more credibility on this matter?
IE, how much ISK have you appropriated, how many accts have you banned. Just give us some concrete examples to show us that you are aware of the problem, have a plan to deal with it, have taken stops to deal with, and have measurable progress.
Check the IGE website.  ---------------- Tarminic - 34 Million SP in Forum Warfare Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.8 (Updated 4/7) |

Hamfast
Lightfoot Industries
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 18:51:00 -
[38]
Originally by: GM Faolchu
Originally by: Jonathan Calvert Perhaps if CCP would provide us with some proof that they were addressing the ISK sales and macro problems in EVE, we could give you more credibility on this matter?
IE, how much ISK have you appropriated, how many accts have you banned. Just give us some concrete examples to show us that you are aware of the problem, have a plan to deal with it, have taken stops to deal with, and have measurable progress.
While there has been some discussion to make such numbers and details of action taken public it is against our normal policy. We approach the matter silently and fight it as hard as we are allowed and hopefully that makes a difference.
We GM's always keep an eye on this particular part of EvE and we appreciate any input you players have to give us.
GM Faolchu,
I realize that releasing the names of the banned or busted is not an option, but it would seem the numbers would not carry with it the stigma... I also understand that the numbers, like 72.6% of all statistics, could be made up on the spot, thus many will question the validity of the numbers...
An every so often report (Monthly perhaps) that stated that X billion ISK removed from the game, Y accounts banned, Z Accounts warned...
It could also have the additional entry for ISK returned and Accounts reinstated (showing a willingness to admit mistakes are made)...
And think, you have the perfect forum for the post (sticky post)... the Crime and Punishment forum.
--------*****--------
Learn and be informed, because a Politicians worst nightmare is an informed voter...
So choose your CSM Candidates wisely
|

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 18:55:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Tarminic Check the IGE website. 
Wahahaaaaa "currently unavailable" on anything EVE-related. Hooray \o/
1|2|3|4|5. |

Alz Shado
Ever Flow
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 19:48:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Tarminic Check the IGE website. 
Wahahaaaaa "currently unavailable" on anything EVE-related. Hooray \o/
Le Sigh.
//// ---------=== []= ---------=== \\\\ Rifter(RedBad)
"Kill a man one is a murderer; kill a million, a conqueror; kill them all, a God." -- Jean Rostand |

MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong FOUNDATI0N
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 19:49:00 -
[41]
Edited by: MotherMoon on 08/04/2008 19:50:36
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Tarminic Check the IGE website. 
Wahahaaaaa "currently unavailable" on anything EVE-related. Hooray \o/
I'm making a note here 
"and we remove tens of billions of illegally purchased ISK every day" do people really buy this much isk every day? that is like what... 5000$?? people playing eve are losing 5000$ a day? wth? who are these players and why aren't they spaming our forums with wahh I got caught.
you sure it's not like 3 billion or less?
epic linkage good job CCP.
|

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 20:17:00 -
[42]
Semi-epic thread : Why ISK-for-secure-GTC is good
No, it doesn't discuss the devblog directly, even if it sort of started that way. I urge you to let it open, and this here is just provided as a reference thread.
1|2|3|4|5. |

Dr Felonius
Civilian Purposes Limited
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 20:35:00 -
[43]
Do you folks at CCP have any plans to improve the market for time cards? It seems like having some in-game market for time cards would be much more flexible (and thus drive prices lower) than relying on forum posts.
|

Xaen
Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 20:45:00 -
[44]
Originally by: GM Faolchu
Originally by: Xaen My SAK alt is still pummeled every 30-90 seconds ISK ads in corp chat. And it's painfully obvious what they are. Price lists anyone?
I'll be spending the rest of my shift sitting in this channel, so far I haven't see anything but I'll keep an eye out.
I could just send you the log snippets.
Sadly, I think little ole grep is capable of finding most of the ISK ads. - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |

Ben Derindar
Dirty Deeds Corp. Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 22:35:00 -
[45]
Originally by: GM Faolchu
Originally by: Jonathan Calvert Perhaps if CCP would provide us with some proof that they were addressing the ISK sales and macro problems in EVE, we could give you more credibility on this matter?
IE, how much ISK have you appropriated, how many accts have you banned. Just give us some concrete examples to show us that you are aware of the problem, have a plan to deal with it, have taken stops to deal with, and have measurable progress.
While there has been some discussion to make such numbers and details of action taken public it is against our normal policy. We approach the matter silently and fight it as hard as we are allowed and hopefully that makes a difference.
We GM's always keep an eye on this particular part of EvE and we appreciate any input you players have to give us.
I have to say I do find it odd that CCP would encourage players to inform each other on the correct processes for transacting isk, while at the same time their own policy is not to divulge information to players that would be invaluable for this very task. I'd love to be able to warn people that they will face the consequences for buying isk illegally like X others did this week/month/whatever, but without that X, how much weight would such warnings really carry?
Certainly it's great that numbers have been divulged in this blog; now let's see it continue on a regular basis. From the players' perspective, silent action = inaction. How are we supposed to know the difference otherwise? I would have thought that CCP would be only too happy to capitalise on this clear and regular opportunity for some positive PR. With all the issues the game has faced in the last 18 months, one would have thought so, anyway.
If it's a question of privacy, then I have to say I take issue with that on a personal level as a CSM candidate. People who break the rules have all the details of their infraction suppressed, while someone looking to make a positive difference for the game is to expect their RL details to be revealed?
How about this for a policy: you break the rules, you forfeit your right to privacy under those same rules, at least if it can be proven that the rules were broken knowingly.
/Ben
Ben Derindar: Eve CSM candidate
|

Wai Ling
Path Finders
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 22:40:00 -
[46]
This is regarding to some good ideas that WoW may have (ONLY good thing)
Blizzard currently has a program named "Warden". Warden is simply a program that presses ban and wtfpwnts hackers and macroers. However, there is more to Warden than the banning spree. Warden is hooked to a backdoor that is downloaded on all computers that has games of Blizzard downloaded. This backdoor transfers a list of all processes that the computer of the user is currently running as well as those simple scripts. It is then up to a human watcher to make the decision whether or not to blacklist a process. It may not be the most effective way to prevent Farmers but it is simply a horsefly that slowly eats away at their economy.
Backdoors may be illegal but you've agreed to have it on your computer in the EULA 
This is my 2 cents |

Lobster Man
Metafarmers
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 23:13:00 -
[47]
As an avid anti-farmer player, I do enjoy sitting in ingunn and popping the hundreds of haulers that come out of the republic justice department hourly. There was a period where it appeared that many, many accounts had been banned, but the farmer hauler spam has been on a steady increase since february. I too would very much like to see at least numbers of banned accounts or something, even if it was made up it would mean that all my hours spent looting shuttle wrecks was not entirely in vain 
Another thing which I have thought of, perhaps it is rather subversive, but farmers are the only other eve players against who I show no mercy. I imagine it'd be fairly easy to identify accounts of farmers running hauling missions 23/7, not only by their obvious names, but by the fact they do not chat or do anything except run missions. Perhaps CCP has the ability to do some modifications to per-player mission settings, such as reducing the LP a farmer receives from his agent by say 95% :)
This would not only make the farmers constantly wary in a less-overt way than being banned, it might help to curtail some of the implant spammage that has brought +4 implants down to around 14m in jita.
Just my 2 cents at least...I hope this post even gets read by a GM/Dev 
|

Typhado3
Ashen Lion Mining and Production Consortium STELLAR LEGION
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 23:17:00 -
[48]
This is one thing I think ccp is doing good in.... though i would like to see them have more powers and tools for getting the spammers. Stuff like word filters through chat to catch the isk selling websites (yes I know what tiny url is) and then apply a mute to that char so no one has to hear them spam.... don't know what powers isd have, I believe they can't ban characters but if u gave em something like a mute ability on players which could only be taken off by a stuck petition would help stem the tide. some ppl may think powers like these are bad cause of free speach/privacy on word filters and misuse on second one but I think they'd be great.
2 Things i didn't see the in this dev blog that I think are important though. Encouraging players to petition isk sellers. The big difference between isk sellers and GTC trade is u can't make rl money out of GTC trade (u can save money but not make it).
I see a lot of these spammers when i sit in the help channel and am getting tired of petitioning them which I do half the time. The other half I just block them figuring that there are already another 5 petitions on the way about that 1 guy.... one thing I've heard though is that when we remove players from our block list they get added to buddy list..... not very fun searching through buddy list for isk spammers and our block lists tend to run out quickly.
Still gotta laugh eacch time I see spammers saying "buy eve GOLD"...... go back to wow =p
|

Typhado3
Ashen Lion Mining and Production Consortium STELLAR LEGION
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 23:27:00 -
[49]
2 things that where missed in dev blog petitioning isk spammers major difference between GTC and isk sellers is you can't make rl money from GTC, u can save some but you can't make it.
would like to see more powers/tools to catch these ppl, word filters for their websites (yes I know what tiny url is) and global mute powers for isd so suspects will have to petition a GM to prove themselves innocent before they can go back to talking (though they can still play the game). I'm guessing the main reason you don't do this is cause it would cause some ppl to complain about privacy/free speech misuse of powers or whatever, but tbh I think most of eve would be fine with it.
also about petitioning isk spammers, i've noticed how u now have to specify a char name. Is this so 5 petitions won't cause problems for GM's? if so tell us so I can go back to petitioning them as my block list is getting full and don't wanna spam more petitions than are already being spammed.
lastly I still laugh whenever I see an isk spammer say "buy eve GOLD"...... go back to wow =p
|

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2008.04.08 23:29:00 -
[50]
Originally by: GM Faolchu While there has been some discussion to make such numbers and details of action taken public it is against our normal policy. We approach the matter silently and fight it as hard as we are allowed and hopefully that makes a difference.
Perhaps a change in policy is needed then. From the general population's standpoint, a "silent fight" is NO fight at all.
I see absolutely no harm in reselasing purely statistical data on a regular basis. Like, say, a weekly report with banned account number, total ISK removed from the economy from banned accounts, number of accounts warning-flagged and total ISK removed from wallets of non-banned accounts. Four numbers, once a week. Or once a month.
1|2|3|4|5. |

Blazde
4S Corporation Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 00:02:00 -
[51]
Any chance of someone expanding on this, I simply doesn't understand the (implied) economic argument behind it:
Quote: Supply and demand dictates that it would be very difficult for an individual to gather tens of billions of ISK with the secure system and thus game balance will not be upset. Corporations, or even Alliances, should not be able to fuel their wars and other activities like they have done in a number of cases with ISK bought for real world money.
_
|

Reptzo
Master Miners Intruders.
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 00:30:00 -
[52]
Edited by: Reptzo on 09/04/2008 00:31:16
Originally by: Blazde Any chance of someone expanding on this, I simply doesn't understand the (implied) economic argument behind it:
Quote: Supply and demand dictates that it would be very difficult for an individual to gather tens of billions of ISK with the secure system and thus game balance will not be upset. Corporations, or even Alliances, should not be able to fuel their wars and other activities like they have done in a number of cases with ISK bought for real world money.
In other words, $5000 will buy and outfit a titan (via buying isk from websites). Some people really have this kind of cash to throw around on a game. That same amount of dollars will buy you significantly less via GTC (less than half the isk amount due to recent GTC value crash). The other problem being that you cant just buy 1000 GTCs and sell them instantly. There has to be people wanting to buy them, and it will take quite a while. So yes it can still be done, and yes there are plenty of people with the real life means to buy 1000 GTCs. It is simply a lot harder for them to turn real $$$ into game money via GTC, as apposed to buying it from farmers.
And, the buying of GTCs has a similar but different effect on the economy, it still enables those with real cash, but increases subscriptions. And there are many good threads about the effects and differences so I'm not going to delve into that argument.
|

Erotic Irony
0bsession
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 00:38:00 -
[53]
Quote: We know that most players out there dislike the macroers, ISK spammers, complex farmers and other RMT spawn just like we do and we ask for your assistance in dealing with them. Tell your friends that buying ISK is against the EULA if the subject is raised. Tell them about the Secure ETC Trading System. Help us raise awareness about this whole issue and together we can change the world of EVE for the better!
While you're at it players, do our bug reporting and documentation too and leave the ship balancing to us!
^_________________________^ ___ Eve Players are not very smart. Support Killmail Overhaul
|

A Sinner
Umbra Congregatio Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 00:42:00 -
[54]
Very good dev blog, though I don't think it will stop the people selling isk for real life money.
Anyway since everyone is talking about gtcs, I thought i should tell you my problem. I used to pay my subscription via credit card, and that doesn't work anymore, I filed several petitions and got answers like : "From our side it looks like there is a problem at your bank." I called the bank and said everything is fine, and I got same replay from the person that answered my petition and he said same thing, that the bank is the problem. Now I don't know who's fault it is, so I got tired of petitioning and asked to be closed. Therefore I decided to use my only GTC reseller in my country, which is , www.computergames.ro . They only have 30 day gtc there at the price of 15 EURO (not $ , EURO). Now a friend of mine is paying 71.70$ for a 6 month subscription with his credit card. So I am paying for the same ammount of time 90 EURO , which means 141.3$ , double the price my friend is paying. So forgive me if I am asking you, but is that fair to me and to the other 5 or 6 people I know that have problmes with their credit cards ? ----------------------- "There are no ugly women, just men who didn't have enough to drink" |

Floresa
Peacebreakers Inc
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 01:11:00 -
[55]
A couple thoughts:
First, to everyone complaining about various forms of spam - you really need to cut CCP some slack. You see, when it comes to blocking spam, end-users will only ever see what gets through, as opposed to what's getting blocked. So CCP could very well be (and probably is) stopping 99.9% of the spam before you see it - but there's so much of it, that the 0.1% that does make it though still feels like "a lot". We really must be understanding that, and generally how difficult this problem is to solve.
Second, to everyone who is demanding that ISK buyers get warned/banned/shot, I think you're overlooking a key problem with that. The minute CCP starts taking any sort of permanent action against ISK buyers is the minute people start receiving "gifts" of purchased ISK from people that don't like them.
- CCP has no way to verify that a player receiving ISK actually purchased that ISK themselves - it could be someone else simply trying to rid themselves of a bitter rival or fierce competitor of some sort.
- The ISK seller obviously has no way to verify that the person paying for the ISK is the actual owner of the account that the ISK is being transferred to, nor would they probably care one way or the other.
That makes it pretty much impossible to take any definitive action against a player, without also triggering an entirely new set of problems. On the other hand, if you eliminate the ISK sellers, you consequently no longer have ISK buyers (i.e., illegitimate ISK buyers).
|

Taco Sundae
Perkone
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 01:16:00 -
[56]
Quote: This is regarding to some good ideas that WoW may have (ONLY good thing)
Blizzard currently has a program named "Warden". Warden is simply a program that presses ban and wtfpwnts hackers and macroers. However, there is more to Warden than the banning spree. Warden is hooked to a backdoor that is downloaded on all computers that has games of Blizzard downloaded. This backdoor transfers a list of all processes that the computer of the user is currently running as well as those simple scripts. It is then up to a human watcher to make the decision whether or not to blacklist a process. It may not be the most effective way to prevent Farmers but it is simply a horsefly that slowly eats away at their economy.
Backdoors may be illegal but you've agreed to have it on your computer in the EULA ugh
This is my 2 cents
Were you kicked in the head by a mule when you were a kid?
Solutions like WOW's warden are the outcome of desperation. They invariably go where they shouldn't be (kernel space) in the effort to out maneuver the macroers/cheaters. This is always a losing race.
Methods like this are always doomed from the start for the exact same reasons that copy protection and DRM are doomed to fail. As long as people still own and control their own hardware they will always be able to avoid detection (they being those who write the macro/cheat software).
If the nanny program stays strictly in userspace then the macro/cheat will hide itself with any of dozens kernelspace rootkits designed to do just this. Then seeing that their nanny program is no longer effective at picking off the major farmers they will decide that the only chance they have to to also move into kernelspace. This will indeed work better at detecting programs hidden by run of the mill rootkits . Unfortunately once that happens the big farming ops with actual financial interest will have their own solution for hiding, which they will not share. All that will have been accomplished by this point is to remove competition from non-savy individuals who macro out of sheer boredom.
The rabbit hole goes even deeper as CCP then decides to take active measures to thwart these farmers. They then decide that the only way to stop them is to hook important win32 API calls(like those commonly used for input injection/sniffing and screen scraping), and then return false results from the api calls when the EVE client is running. Unfortunately for CCP computers are wonderful things and there are always a 1001 ways to do something. CCP will never be able to plug every possible method that farmers could use to accomplish their goals. If they hook an API call that enables input to be injected into the message queue, macro software could then just implement their own "clean" version of the api call. Once again the only ones thwarted are those without the know-how or without the financial incentive to hire someone with the know-how.
This process will continue ad infinitum until CCP finally calls it quits on the nanny. We will then all be left having to run this nanny program which is doing unspeakable things in kernelspace, and largely to no effect. All it will do is keep the honest peeps honest.
Even if they do achieve the Holy Grail of nanny programs it will be to no avail. If the people who REALLY want to macro cant do it in software, they will do it in hardware. For 25 bucks in parts and a little know-how, smart macro'ing hardware could easily be made. They would look to the system like a run of the mill keyboard or mouse but really be a small uC sending input recieved from the macro program through some other channel(be it USB, Ethernet or whatever take your pick).
This kind of fight is futile in every regard and I believe CCP knows this. Trust me this is a rabbit hole that you don't want to start down. Everyone but the major farmers lose.
Thats my 2.5 pesos.
|

Lucas Avignon
Avignon Associates Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 01:46:00 -
[57]
You say raise awareness, could CCP please put a message in red above the username at the log in screen telling players that isk buying is illegal and possible a link to the GTC forums.
I know CCP did this before, but I think a more pernament message in red so everyone will see it at the log in screen would really make sure EVERYONE knows that it's wrong and you do have an option by using the secure system.
.... sig goes here!
|

Ephemeron
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 02:36:00 -
[58]
Originally by: SillyWaif
Quote: There are also the macro miners and mission runners, complex farmers and assorted rabble of this sort that causes general nuisance ...
I like running missions and I take offence if you compare/associate me(/our corp/other players who like that kind of gameplay) with Real Money Trading. It's annoying enough to see the spam for it in local, without this particular sentence in a Dev Blog...
I agree with CCP that you are all scum. How dare you speak to real people? know your place in the food chain, keep in your head in the dirt! 
|

Erotic Irony
0bsession
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 03:28:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Ephemeron keep in your head in the dirt! 
indeed ___ Eve Players are not very smart. Support Killmail Overhaul
|

Moraguth
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 07:44:00 -
[60]
Originally by: GM Grimmi
Now, every time we start denouncing the ISK sellers, some people call us hypocrites because we allow the ISK for ETCs but not ISK for RL money and claim this is the same thing. Nothing could be farther from the truth; the differences are enormous.
I still haven't seen these "enormous" differences. I agree that ETC stuff is the lesser of two evils, but still.... Basically, people with money to burn irl can use that money to give their eve character more isk. This upsets the ballance. Mostly, i'm upset cause i'm too poor to do it >.< good game
http://morsus-mihi.net/kb/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=17737
Please visit your user settings to re-enable images.[/url] |

Carniflex
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 09:05:00 -
[61]
Keep up the good work!
And I also vote to add message in big letters, so even slow people can read it, into login screen announcing that 'One shall feel the pain if he buys the isk for real money'.
I also think that heavier hammer to smash isk buyer fingers would not be too bad. Say temporary warning bans similar to forums systems to illustrate why it is bad thing would not be too extravagant in my opinion. Afterall main problem is the people that do buy the isk for real money.
GTC sales are indeed lesser of the possible evils.
Please visit your user settings to re-enable images. |

Jowen Datloran
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 09:09:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Xaen
My SAK alt is still pummeled every 30-90 seconds ISK ads in corp chat. And it's painfully obvious what they are. Price lists anyone?
And Xaen still gets 2-3 evemail spams a week, same as before.
This does not match my experience.
Before Trinity 1.1 the corp channel spam was so severe that I was actually considering leaving the corp. But after the patch, I see 0-1 isk adds during an evening gaming session. Also, unlike the previous spam floods that killed off any normal conversation in corp chat, these adds only get displayed once, and I or others normally follow it up with explaining that buying isk is against the EULA. This also gives plenty of time to spend 30 sec to petition the bastard.
I do get more isk add mails though (one pr. day), but that is nowhere as bad as the previous situation.
More improvements are of course welcomed. ---------------- Mr. Science & Trade Institute |

Wang Chaupang
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 10:51:00 -
[63]
Good intentions, but please explain this: if I fly to a random ICE-belt I can spot several macromining groups. Why don't you see them, let alone do anything about them?
I have never bothered reporting them because there are many comments about them not taken seriously. |

Aeris Achura
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 11:02:00 -
[64]
Unfortunatly ive had the same problem with my main char on this account. and i read the complaints in corp chat as well. We reported macroiceminers but nothing is done against them.
Someone suicide ganked a macroiceminer in high sec to prove it was a macroer and saw the pod jump in and out of the belts several times as the macro was still running. A bit weard if nothing gets done to that.
Macro`s can be quite smart in avoiding detection from computers... as ive noticed by the claims of "no proof" from ccp. Please make more work against macroiceminers so that we get rid of these pains.... |

Vyger
The first genesis Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 12:21:00 -
[65]
Originally by: GM Grimmi If you need ISK, then please use the Secure ETC Trading System.
No. How about playing the game.
Disagree with you entirely about GTC. If people have difficulty paying with the existing methods then provide alternative methods, ie. one's that don't involve giving players a means of converting RL money to ISK.
Just a personal opinion though, from one of your 5 year vets.
|

Lord Eremet
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 12:22:00 -
[66]
I must say that what CCP did works.
Before I had to endure daily on average 2 dozen or more sell ads for Isk in the blueprint-channel. I soon gave up on blocking them because next day they was back with another start-up character doing it again.
Now there goes whole days without me seeing a single one. I saw one isk-seller yesterday, for the first time in 3 days 
Good Work CCP 
|

Kerfira
University of Caille
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 12:38:00 -
[67]
Edited by: Kerfira on 09/04/2008 12:43:05
Originally by: Moraguth
Originally by: GM Grimmi
Now, every time we start denouncing the ISK sellers, some people call us hypocrites because we allow the ISK for ETCs but not ISK for RL money and claim this is the same thing. Nothing could be farther from the truth; the differences are enormous.
I still haven't seen these "enormous" differences. I agree that ETC stuff is the lesser of two evils, but still.... Basically, people with money to burn irl can use that money to give their eve character more isk. This upsets the ballance. Mostly, i'm upset cause i'm too poor to do it >.<
If CCP didn't offer the secure ETC trading they do, people WOULD buy from ISK farmers!
CCP are trying to attack ISK farmers in two ways: 1. Provide a secure and attractive way for player-to-player trade of ISK/gametime. 2. Deal with RL-money ISK traders harshly (buyers and sellers).
#2 will help drive people to #1, but if #1 didn't exist, CCP would have to continuously pour money/resources into combating #2.
A player out to buy ISK doesn't really care who he buys it from. He can probably get it cheaper from an ISK seller, but with a significant risk. Thus most people will probably go for the secure and approved method of getting ISK for their money. This benefits the game in several ways. The money that would have gone to the ISK seller now goes to CCP, funding their game development for the good of all of us. A player that might not have been able to afford playing can now do so through buying ETC's for ISK. Both are made of pure 'win', both for CCP AND the players of EVE.
As for the complaints of 'Nobody should be able to buy their way ahead..', really, how does it hurt YOUR game experience that some player got his ship through ETC selling and not through mining/whatever? There'll be players with better ships than you anyway.... It really only gives you another target you wouldn't have had otherwise....
PS: I never bought ISK for money through any of the systems. I don't like the concept but since you can't prevent it from happening, the ETC solution is a good one.
Originally by: CCP Wrangler EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world.
|

Tlar Sanqua
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 13:16:00 -
[68]
I added this in the ideas forum, but one huge benefit would be to have a page like this in the tutorial.
The number of players who have started the game and not realised that buying isk is bad and if they were told in the tutorials then it would help reduce the numbers buying (it won't stop it, but it would reduce it).
|

Xaen
Caldari Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 13:21:00 -
[69]
Originally by: SillyWaif
Originally by: Xaen
My SAK alt is still pummeled every 30-90 seconds ISK ads in corp chat. And it's painfully obvious what they are. Price lists anyone?
And Xaen still gets 2-3 evemail spams a week, same as before.
Maybe it's not an option you (want to) use: I have set my CSPA charge to 1 Mil ISK and after that the number spam mails have greatly reduced. I rarely get them these days, luckily. Intention was 'to make them pay' 
That won't help the ads in corp chat as I said above. - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |

Al Merrick
Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 13:32:00 -
[70]
Edited by: Al Merrick on 09/04/2008 13:32:27 damn right, isk sellers/buyers burn in eve hell i absolutely hate seein the strings of miners comin in and out of station macro mining away, or the traders. thats not the game i pay to play
|

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 13:46:00 -
[71]
Originally by: Wang Chaupang Good intentions, but please explain this: if I fly to a random ICE-belt I can spot several macromining groups. Why don't you see them, let alone do anything about them?
I have never bothered reporting them because there are many comments about them not taken seriously.
they are macroing because why? (well unless they are there 23/7, but then it could also be account sharing pretty easily too) is it because there is a large group mining together? oh and given 2-3 comps i could pretty easily run that many ice miners myself with little problem, aka f1-f2 on the mining barges and just work the hauler dropping cans every 10 or so mins with each miner.
personally if i was to mine ice i wouldn't find it worth it to be in a group of less than 8 miners, a gang booster, and hauler
|

Gazespring
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 13:46:00 -
[72]
This is all I can do? Tell my friends that its bad?? What do I do about macro miners? Its nice to know that CCP acknowledges this poison to the game, but they need to do MUCH more...... pffft tell my friends.
|

Ambassador Zepher
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 14:11:00 -
[73]
First off, Good Job IMO on the Work so far to prevent these things.
I have an idea though.. Seriously how many people can live in one house? Why not put restrictions on the number of trial accounts than can be logged in at specific IP's per a period of time. Say 4 per six months? This would mean that after 4 Trial accounts have been logged in at that location, the allotted account table for that IP would become full and only subscription accounts could be logged in from then on.
This would give each IP a fair chance to have trial accounts. And seriously, if there are 4 people living in one house all playing EvE, then one of them can show the new guy what the games like.
I know the major concerns with banning IP's. Its a very powerful tool, but can also bite you in the butt. |

Xaen
Caldari Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 14:19:00 -
[74]
Originally by: GM Faolchu I'll be spending the rest of my shift sitting in this channel, so far I haven't see anything but I'll keep an eye out.
Just in case you missed it, or they read your post, here's some greped out of my corplog with this little regex: "\\$.*[0-9]m\|[0-9]m.*\\$"
[ 2008.04.05 21:10:00 ] a8xwce > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.05 21:10:06 ] a8xwce > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.05 21:10:49 ] a8xwce > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.05 21:13:00 ] a8xwce > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:35:02 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:35:41 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:36:08 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:36:44 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:37:24 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:38:21 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:39:15 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:39:39 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:40:22 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:41:08 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:43:35 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:44:14 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:49:10 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:49:51 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+
See the timestamps? - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |

The Racketeer
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 14:33:00 -
[75]
Originally by: Moraguth
Originally by: GM Grimmi
Now, every time we start denouncing the ISK sellers, some people call us hypocrites because we allow the ISK for ETCs but not ISK for RL money and claim this is the same thing. Nothing could be farther from the truth; the differences are enormous.
I still haven't seen these "enormous" differences. I agree that ETC stuff is the lesser of two evils, but still.... Basically, people with money to burn irl can use that money to give their eve character more isk. This upsets the ballance. Mostly, i'm upset cause i'm too poor to do it >.<
`
Its a balance that allows the person buying reasonable amounts of isk through gtcs and helping keep eve members in game through the trading of gtcs for isk. helping more players that participate unlike isk farmers that ruin eve and don't participate at all. there is a limit to how many gtcs a person can go out and pay for vers the sliding scale the isk farmers sell it at. your not going to buy 1B worth of isk through the real world purchases of gtcs, it would cost too much. yet if you bought it with real money through isk sellers CCP will spot that much isk being funneled into your accounts.
|

Moizo
Species 5618 Carpe Universitas
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 15:04:00 -
[76]
I personally wouldn't mind helping with this problem, I pay for my 2 accounts with ISK, from GTC's and i can't help but notice the pricechanges in them for the last year.
When i started off as a poor low-sec miner with a proud 20million ISK in my wallet i had to save up to 100million to buy a GTC for 30days, now that is 150-200mil, that makes it hard for new players, you cannot gather that amount of isk when you have just started, so inevitably, new players will have to start off with a credit-card, which has been a major turnoff for my real life friends, as it will be for others.
I'm hoping this pricechange comes from the bad people mentioned in the Dev-Blog :) and so my question in this case is: what, besides buying GTC's, can be done to help rid us of this nuisance, what should a player look for when he thinks he's dealing with a macro'ing hulk/raven etc, or with a ISK selling spammer in local?
Thank you, Moizo
|

Khanid Kutie
I R Teh Poasting Alt Corp
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 15:13:00 -
[77]
what makes this form of RMT any different than CCP's "legal" RMT? Neither way is injecting cash into the economy. I am playing devil's advocate here. Why should someone's RL wallet and bankroll have any affect on this game.
If you're going to ban one form of RMT, ban them all. ____________________________________________
Originally by: Thargat They should change the name of CAOD to EvE Zoo. Please to not feed the animals.
|

chichi boom
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 15:20:00 -
[78]
Raising awarness about the ETC system needs some extra umph I think. This is probably the first eve forum I have read fully and definatley the first I have replied to (thanks for putting it on the login screen for eve). Also, when I was a rookie, I saw all of those ISK seller ads and thought, "Hey, it would be pretty cool to have 100mil at this stage of the game." However, it wasn't until I joined a corp, the corp joined an alliance, and we got our first carrier blown up that I knew that ETCs existed. It would probably help alot if you let fresh eve players know about the ETC system right at the start of the game, the same time ISK sellers get their adverts through.
|

Lowkey Asgaurd
Minmatar Freelancing Corp Confederation of Independent Corporations
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 15:46:00 -
[79]
Hi
I have been petitioning spammers and isk seller at every opertunity as I would like to help CCP. At some point I even offered to help CCP in one of my petitions offering to buy isk from one of the sellers so they could follow the transaction and catch the EULA violater.
I got the usuall automated reply to which I replied by completing the Rating to the closed petition. I find it hard to believe that CCP wants to get spammers and sellers out of the game as they didn't even sound interested in any help to catch them. A reply stating thanks but we cannot do things that way would even have been satisfactory but I not sure that the petitions are even view individually by an actual person.
In closing I will continue to try and help CCP but I find it difficult to believe that they are truely interested in catching these guys as proven by my offer to buy the isk so they could catch him. And no I would not have ask to keep the isk.
Regards Lowkey
|

Z010
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 15:51:00 -
[80]
Originally by: Kayscha This just offers RMTers a safe loophole at slightly reduced profits and requiring an extra step, selling time cards for cash at a discount.
Hardly that. In one sense, and one sense only are they the same. People with cash can buy isk. However, the cash is going into the game (i.e. CCP) and this assists further development of the game. For the seller the isk is used to speed up a process in the game. When it is not ETC the cash goes to a person/people with no interest in EvE other than to make real money from players.
Personally - I have sold GTC via the ETC interface. It is simple, and it is dangerous - in that it can become an addiction - why mine that belt for XXX hours/days when you can sell a GTC and go buy your new EvE gadget, blueprint, etc..
However, I also admit that it has kept me in the game - if I had had to earn all the isk I needed to get my first eve commerce activity going I would have left the game. Eve requires a vision and time, but that is not always "fun". On the otherhand - eventually I hope to buy GTC regularly with the isk I am finally starting to make from these ventures. First I need to get my jump freighter built - about 40% there.
|

F0XY
Imperial Shipment
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 16:10:00 -
[81]
we have seen a very dramatic reduction in the amount of spam that is reaching players.
Thank you CCP - I have noticed this too, good job guys!
|

Bellum Eternus
Gallente Death of Virtue Sex Panthers
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 16:21:00 -
[82]
Originally by: Bartholomeus Crane I'm somewhat offended to be called assorted rabble simply because I like doing the PvE content of EvE!
Surely this can't be what you mean?
If not, an apology would be appropriate ...
Only a carebear would go so far as to misconstrue the OP as a personal insult to mission runners and then whine about it. Get a clue.
Bellum Eternus [Vid] L E G E N D A R Y [Vid] L E G E N D A R Y I I |

Bellum Eternus
Gallente Death of Virtue Sex Panthers
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 16:35:00 -
[83]
The ability for players to turn RL money into ISK needs to be removed. All this crap about allowing players to 'use ISK to pay' when they otherwise wouldn't have the chance is just crap.
Make an in-game system where you DIRECTLY transfer ISK to CCP and CCP directly adds game time to your account. Period. If your account as expired, then allow a web based interface to accomplish the exact same thing.
No more 3rd party GTC sales and then allowing those GTCs to be traded for ISK. Buy a GTC and use it? Fine. Use ISK in game to purchase more time? Fine. Buy a GTC then trade it for ISK? NOT FINE.
I don't care if it is the 'lesser of two evils'. CCP is directly condoning RMT by allowing this to exist. And there is zero need for it to exist. IMO they don't care about RMT. What they care about is when the RMT doesn't go through THEM, and they don't make the money.
Sure, their system is 'less damaging', but you're still allowing players with stacks of RL money to have a large advantage over someone who doesn't. So yeah CCP, you're still being hypocritical. Don't do it.
Bellum Eternus [Vid] L E G E N D A R Y [Vid] L E G E N D A R Y I I |

Major Stallion
Four Rings Phalanx Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 17:19:00 -
[84]
Originally by: Bellum Eternus The ability for players to turn RL money into ISK needs to be removed. All this crap about allowing players to 'use ISK to pay' when they otherwise wouldn't have the chance is just crap.
Make an in-game system where you DIRECTLY transfer ISK to CCP and CCP directly adds game time to your account. Period. If your account as expired, then allow a web based interface to accomplish the exact same thing.
No more 3rd party GTC sales and then allowing those GTCs to be traded for ISK. Buy a GTC and use it? Fine. Use ISK in game to purchase more time? Fine. Buy a GTC then trade it for ISK? NOT FINE.
I don't care if it is the 'lesser of two evils'. CCP is directly condoning RMT by allowing this to exist. And there is zero need for it to exist. IMO they don't care about RMT. What they care about is when the RMT doesn't go through THEM, and they don't make the money.
Sure, their system is 'less damaging', but you're still allowing players with stacks of RL money to have a large advantage over someone who doesn't. So yeah CCP, you're still being hypocritical. Don't do it.
QFT....REMOVE ALL METHODS OF RMT, CCP. You are advocating what you orignially condoned. The ability of people to use RL cash to get ahead in this game
|

Paddlefoot Aeon
Neogen Industries Daisho Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 17:46:00 -
[85]
While I agree that reducing the demand will help curtail the sellers, I also think that reporting the sellers and enablers (macro'ers and cloaking farmers) needs to be easier as well.
If you, in the petitions section, had a specific category "RMT activities", and all you had to input was the character name, you could set it up so that "... more than x complaints against that character would merit GM review of their activities".
Yes, some people may abuse this function (like getting an alliance to petition a rival alliance's Titan pilot, for example). Simply impose bans on false reporting as you there already are for filing a false police report, for example. Then if Alliance X petition's Alliance Y's Titan pilot, all petitioning members will get their accounts banned.
Also, I would consider expanding your "banning powers". Don't just ban that account... ban all accounts paid for by that credit card, or registerd to the same person. Be ruthless. Now Recruiting. Join "Neogen" channel for details
|

Alaknor Dresden
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 17:51:00 -
[86]
Yes, yes, yes... CCP you strike again:
"Trading currency for isk is just awful for the game! Don't do it! Now if you want to trade money for in-game currency, make sure you do it through GTCs, because trading money for in-game currency isn't so bad, when you give us the money."
|

Moostang
DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 17:52:00 -
[87]
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Help us raise awareness about this whole issue and together we can change the world of EVE for the better!
Do something about the ******** log off tactics and we can help you alot more. It is too easy for farmers to simply CTRL-Q to evade hostiles. Logging out of the game in hostile territory should NEVER BE A WAY OUT OF A FIGHT!
0.0 space is littered with farmers that simply log off for x amount of time when someone else jumps into the system. Give us a better chance to kill them and we'll squash their efforts.
I can easily combat the ones that warp and cloak, but logging off is too effective.
Moostang Darkstar 1 Goonswarm
Priceless Necro Thread |

Karlemgne
Tides Of War
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 17:58:00 -
[88]
Originally by: Z010
Originally by: Kayscha This just offers RMTers a safe loophole at slightly reduced profits and requiring an extra step, selling time cards for cash at a discount.
Hardly that. In one sense, and one sense only are they the same. People with cash can buy isk. However, the cash is going into the game (i.e. CCP) and this assists further development of the game. For the seller the isk is used to speed up a process in the game. When it is not ETC the cash goes to a person/people with no interest in EvE other than to make real money from players.
Personally - I have sold GTC via the ETC interface. It is simple, and it is dangerous - in that it can become an addiction - why mine that belt for XXX hours/days when you can sell a GTC and go buy your new EvE gadget, blueprint, etc..
However, I also admit that it has kept me in the game - if I had had to earn all the isk I needed to get my first eve commerce activity going I would have left the game. Eve requires a vision and time, but that is not always "fun". On the otherhand - eventually I hope to buy GTC regularly with the isk I am finally starting to make from these ventures. First I need to get my jump freighter built - about 40% there.
No, I agree with you. Eve is unlike other games where you grind for levels, in that you train skills in real time. This has an effect of making it so that the people who have less time to play still end up with the skills to fly new and better ships, yet don't have the isk to afford it.
In a different game, since you are grinding for levels, you are always earning in-game currency in proportion to your characters level.
This is eve's greatest problem that you're onto.
|

Thathys
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 18:51:00 -
[89]
Buying secure ETC codes for selling,isn't that Isk selling?
Players can still buy as much Isk as i want from CCP,if they have enough dollars!?
Shouldn't there be a limit to how much you can buy?
Maby i'm stupid! correct me if i have understood wrong. :)
|

Lance85
Caldari State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 19:20:00 -
[90]
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Our very own Customer Service team has written a blog to inform you all about the Secure ETC Trading System and why it should be used. They+re also informing you of some things you might not have been aware of when it comes to Real Money Trading (RMT) like the fact the people you buy from will steal your credit card information if they get the chance, and ISK sellers are also behind macro mining and other things none of us wish to see in EVE. Pleas read Real Money Trading is bad, mkay? to get the full story!
I take tremendous offence to the imputation that I (a mission runner) am in anyway associated with isk sellers. If anything you should be looking towards the people who use probes to get in to our missions and steal our wrecks and loot.
----------------------------------------------- Lance85
Mission-Runner, Miner, Production-Specialist, Privateer |

What'hat
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 19:47:00 -
[91]
Originally by: Lance85
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Our very own Customer Service team has written a blog to inform you all about the Secure ETC Trading System and why it should be used. They+re also informing you of some things you might not have been aware of when it comes to Real Money Trading (RMT) like the fact the people you buy from will steal your credit card information if they get the chance, and ISK sellers are also behind macro mining and other things none of us wish to see in EVE. Pleas read Real Money Trading is bad, mkay? to get the full story!
I take tremendous offence to the imputation that I (a mission runner) am in anyway associated with isk sellers. If anything you should be looking towards the people who use probes to get in to our missions and steal our wrecks and loot.
EPIC fail... of course ordinary mission runners isn't a problem... think! He's talking about a macro missioning...
Read the thread before posting, your answer is in post 7...
|

Talos Darkhart
Minmatar Republic University
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 20:07:00 -
[92]
Originally by: Reptzo Edited by: Reptzo on 09/04/2008 00:31:16
Originally by: Blazde Any chance of someone expanding on this, I simply doesn't understand the (implied) economic argument behind it:
Quote: Supply and demand dictates that it would be very difficult for an individual to gather tens of billions of ISK with the secure system and thus game balance will not be upset. Corporations, or even Alliances, should not be able to fuel their wars and other activities like they have done in a number of cases with ISK bought for real world money.
In other words, $5000 will buy and outfit a titan (via buying isk from websites). Some people really have this kind of cash to throw around on a game. That same amount of dollars will buy you significantly less via GTC (less than half the isk amount due to recent GTC value crash). The other problem being that you cant just buy 1000 GTCs and sell them instantly. There has to be people wanting to buy them, and it will take quite a while. So yes it can still be done, and yes there are plenty of people with the real life means to buy 1000 GTCs. It is simply a lot harder for them to turn real $$$ into game money via GTC, as apposed to buying it from farmers.
And, the buying of GTCs has a similar but different effect on the economy, it still enables those with real cash, but increases subscriptions. And there are many good threads about the effects and differences so I'm not going to delve into that argument.
All though there is certain situations where there are ways around this say you have alliance/corp A they farm moons make lot's of iskies and buy GTC from forums they then contact another alliance with conections to a etc trade website or a etc seller directly and offer to sell them the etc's at a lower price than CCP supplies them for they get real money and the etc seller makes more profit.
Now this could not happen could it?
|

Arlon Magistar
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 20:07:00 -
[93]
It occurs to me that there are some legitimate concerns in here, and also some outright whining. Perhaps my two cents' worth will help somewhat. First and foremost: YES, any form of converting RL cash to ISK is inherently bad. Okay, point conceded. HOWEVER -- the fact is, it IS going to happen. Legally or otherwise, players are going to buy ISK to get ahead quick. What CCP is doing with the Secure ETC system is reducing the impact in-game by allowing a legal outlet to do so at greatly reduced profit. It may not be a popular idea with some players but it does stem the tide somewhat, and in the process provides an influx of cash to CCP to continue development of the game. Second, there really does need to be something done about all these bloody macro miners/macro missioners that fund the ISK sellers. Not just in 0.0, either --- the things are prolific in high-sec as well, to the point that HONEST miners have to haul through stargates if we want to find belts worth mining. As a suggestion for #2 --- while the macros themselves may be difficult to detect, their effects in-game are much less so. After all, macro runners typically stay AFK while doing their thing, so an auto-timer to detect long periods afk would effectively cripple the process. It's not very good for legitimate players afk-mining, but it would serve the purpose until a better solution could be formed. Thirdly, punishment for offenders --- as much as I hate to say this, the only effective one I can see is IP-banning of repeat offenders. If an IP has more than X number of accounts deleted/banned in Y amount of time, ban it. (More than one person in the same house playing EVE? Too bad. Educate your friends on the dangers of selling ISK and ruining everyone else's game for them. Police your own network; kick your isk-selling friend off the router before you ALL get banned. It's brutal, yes, but it will work.) Think I'm too harsh? Go play a game like Neveron, where cash-for-rewards has completely ruined what began as a good game. If you don't spend massive amoounts of RL cash on the otherwise-"free" game, you get pwned by everyone who does. CCP's system works a whole lot better, trust me. OK, I'm shutting up now. I'm logged in as I write this, bellied up to a CONCORD billboard at a stargate, and I have lots of mining to do if I want my new battleship so I better get back to PLAYING THE GAME. Cheers.
|

Xaen
Caldari Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 20:12:00 -
[94]
Originally by: Thathys Buying secure ETC codes for selling,isn't that Isk selling?
Players can still buy as much Isk as i want from CCP,if they have enough dollars!?
Shouldn't there be a limit to how much you can buy?
Maby i'm stupid! correct me if i have understood wrong. :)
You're not buying it from CCP. ISK purchased from the secure GTC site comes from a player. They have to get it through the same means you do, odds are they simply have more time to do it. If CCP just "printed" ISK the economy would take a dive in a hurry. - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |

Floresa
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 20:13:00 -
[95]
Originally by: Bellum Eternus Make an in-game system where you DIRECTLY transfer ISK to CCP and CCP directly adds game time to your account. Period. If your account as expired, then allow a web based interface to accomplish the exact same thing.
You weren't a finance major, were you? All that would do is cut their revenue by some large percentage, probably to the point where it's not even profitable to keep the servers running. Great suggestion.
|

Khan Rean
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 20:42:00 -
[96]
i think the best way to deal with isk sellers and macrominers is still to hunt them down and pod them until they give up

|

Wyn Pharoh
Gallente Venture Capital Dark Taboo
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 21:25:00 -
[97]
Well Im certainly of the opinion Secure GTC transactions for ISK is a fantastic phenom. I work hard to earn my ISK to afford my gameplay and would never have opted out of the MMO's that I played previously had this potential not been part of the ingame dynamic. I CAME to this game because my ingame experience would allow me to afford to play without having to accept all sorts of shady consequences. From an economics perspective, I also believe that this system is really on target! The only way to combat black markets is through removing them with legitimization and or outright hostile takeover. Other MMO's actions to date only increase the profitability of their black markets, because any markets' profitability ALWAYS IMPROVES by the restriction of supply. At the same time, there will alway be demand, period, for any type of advantage that is humanly concievable. Part of the human condition, as it where and a fact of life that is simply unavoidable. Just spend some time examining narcoprofiteering in the real world, and you too will realize that the harder you attempt to control any particular market or commodity, the greater the attraction to exploitation of said market or commodity becomes.
Short of invading [insert EVERY developing nation here], lining up and shooting ALL the ISK farmers worldwide in RL, these "problems" will be a fact of life no differently than opiom, coca or epehdra farmers are in RL. To be honest though, within days, even this solution would be compromised by the suddenly drastic supply condition, and a whole new generation of farmers would emerge, ones who factored the cost of guns and ammunition into the suddenly inflated prices of black market ISK.
CCP IS WAY AHEAD of the game here, as usual. Lets hope they invest that RL$ for ISK that comes their way via Secure ETC in ways that continue to impress. Smash the State...and Have A Nice Day!!! |

Almente
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 21:50:00 -
[98]
Ok, allow me to ask you something... For a very long period of time some allies selling isks, capital ships and T2 BPO for ally members, it is go for ages now (selling for $). It is started at the end of 2003 - begging of 2004. Did you ban even single person for this? As long as I know (and I know about it since end of 2003) - no. So... nice thread, but 100% non actual for real isk sellers, who is smiling now. They do not spam in local or by mail system, they just sell it to ally members. And then you do a petition about it - you answer is very simple "we are bounded, because we don't have enough proofs", you are joking, right? . And you are really afraid of they unban petitions, because they know how to hide it well enough And I don't even want to talk about selling characters for $, you ban em for a week and right after you unbun em with excuses and you add 10 extra day to they account. GM Grimmi, do you really think eve players are stupid and would believe in justice in EVE? Do you think you are doing your best to improve game performance, then to improve CCP income? P.S. Sorry, had to write with an alt, prooly it will help, but I do know, some of the sellers has good friends between GM's
|

Harah Parahtesteez
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 22:16:00 -
[99]
Some of you guys take this game waaay to serious. I ETC once in a while for the simple fact that I can't sit around staring at rocks all day. My job is boring enough in real life, I just wanna pew pew a little and have FUN! CCP is doing a decent (not perfect) job of filtering the channels. Just a goofy idea but is there a way CCP can give everyone a farmer hunting permit for one day to see if it even affects the market. Maybe to see the impact it makes on the game? PVM?
|

Tzrailasa
Destructive Influence Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 22:23:00 -
[100]
Originally by: Moostang
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Help us raise awareness about this whole issue and together we can change the world of EVE for the better!
Do something about the re-tar-ded log off tactics and we can help you alot more. It is too easy for farmers to simply CTRL-Q to evade hostiles. Logging out of the game in hostile territory should NEVER BE A WAY OUT OF A FIGHT!
I agree completely....
Not only for farmers, but also certain other groups known for logoffski'ing to avoid fights 
My views are my own. They do not represent the views of my corporation or alliance. |

Blazde
4S Corporation Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 23:27:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Reptzo Edited by: Reptzo on 09/04/2008 00:31:16
Originally by: Blazde Any chance of someone expanding on this, I simply doesn't understand the (implied) economic argument behind it:
Quote: Supply and demand dictates that it would be very difficult for an individual to gather tens of billions of ISK with the secure system and thus game balance will not be upset. Corporations, or even Alliances, should not be able to fuel their wars and other activities like they have done in a number of cases with ISK bought for real world money.
In other words, $5000 will buy and outfit a titan (via buying isk from websites). Some people really have this kind of cash to throw around on a game. That same amount of dollars will buy you significantly less via GTC (less than half the isk amount due to recent GTC value crash). The other problem being that you cant just buy 1000 GTCs and sell them instantly. There has to be people wanting to buy them, and it will take quite a while. So yes it can still be done, and yes there are plenty of people with the real life means to buy 1000 GTCs. It is simply a lot harder for them to turn real $$$ into game money via GTC, as apposed to buying it from farmers.
In other words the statement in bold from the devblog is completely false? It's merely a bit more pricey than doing it illegally, and takes a bit longer. I've watched people buying titanesque numbers of GTC and sell them in a few days. Not as easy as dialing 1800-ISKPLS I'll admit but it does have the benefit of being a lot safer.
I don't mind if CCP want to allow GTC trading, it's their game. I personally wouldn't, but it's not my choice.
What I do have a problem with is the dishonesty (or ignorance) about the real effects of such a descion.
People buy titans with real life money via the GTC system. Fact. People fuel wars with real life money via the GTC system. Fact. Game balance is affected by the GTC trading system. Fact.
Devs being upfront and open with players is one of the things that first attracted me to this game. Fortunately it seems a GM wrote this misguided paragraph not a dev so hopefully all is still well. _
|

Comproller
|
Posted - 2008.04.09 23:28:00 -
[102]
I think it is great that CCP is going to do something about Macro Farmers and Macro Mission People.. they dont deserve to be involved with people who play for the fun and the challenge of Eve. Eve is so open to everyone and all you need is to get passed the learning curve and you can make it in the game the legit way. by running missions , minning and salvaging. ive been setting my schedule to all of these options....
Thanks for creating a kick ass game CCP..
|

Zoltar Torzoid
Gallente Swag Co. Endless Horizon
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 01:13:00 -
[103]
Edited by: Zoltar Torzoid on 10/04/2008 01:13:20 That's all fine and good, but what is CCP intending to actually do about macro-farmers? In my current home area in game I can sit on a gate and watch macro, after macro, after macro fly by running stupid little hauler missions. There are so many of them that it's become a waste of effort, and actually a potential threat to the health of the normal players to try to kill them all on gates. Taking gate fire just to kill a bunch of haulers with cattle in them isn't exactly the ideal way of getting rid of the problem. I've personally petitioned one of the systems I frequent that can have 10+ macro-characters at any given moment. I'll believe CCP cares about killing this problem when I seem them actually doing something about it other than asking us to stop buying isk. I'd petition each and every macro-character I see, but then all I'd ever do is petition. Maybe I should spend about 3 days petitioning macro-characters and CCP will get fed up with me calling them out and get rid of them.
-Zoltar
We Build the Stuff You Steal |

Thorradin
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 01:14:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Xaen
Originally by: GM Krymus
Originally by: Xaen I'll take things like this seriously when the ISK channel and EVEMail spam cease.
There's no reason CCP can't stop it entirely with a mere bayesian filter on chat and EVE mail, but they seem to think it's too hard, so don't even try.
If Google can do it for all of Gmail without perceivable slowdown of mail delivery, surely CCP can do it for a tiny fraction of the number of accounts and messages that comprises TQ.
I'm tired of the excuses. Reporting sellers is a waste of my time, they'll be back on a new account in less time than it takes me to report them.
I completely understand your concerns with regards to this. You may or may not have noticed the dramatic reduction in spam since the deployment of Trinity 1.1, in which a large number of features (as mentioned in the dev blog) were introduced. I agree that if any spam is able to get through (which, unfortunately, some still does) then there is room for improvement. Please be assured that we will continue to work on developing tools to prevent spam from reaching players.
I haven't noticed a difference.
My SAK alt is still pummeled every 30-90 seconds ISK ads in corp chat. And it's painfully obvious what they are. Price lists anyone?
And Xaen still gets 2-3 evemail spams a week, same as before.
Most of what I see is so obviously ISK spam that any halfassed bayesian filter would nail it in a heartbeat. But you're not using one.
Without giving away circumvention techniques, is there any way to describe what was actually done? I hope it wasn't some stopgap measure like banning accounts. That's like trying to fight a flood with a stick.
I petitioned an isk spammer I saw when I first logged in.
Over an hour later, SWA's corp channel has only had the usual random chatter.
|

Achurnin
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 02:24:00 -
[105]
Edited by: Achurnin on 10/04/2008 02:25:20 Ah, I don't have much to say about any of the above listed except ... if it's the macros that are giving the problem (ie ... large quantities of isk and items for RM purchases) then keep an eye out for the macros. Boot em, disrupt their business.
As for game play, I've noticed that every game most items for sale that are worth anything are almost always overpriced. I think it was said, "that RM transfers cause the prices to go down." If this is the case, then we should buy up some isk, because it's very hard for a new player to get started to do anything.
Was looking at an inventory list of items needed to create a low level rig, and even though I've salvaged 95% of my mission debree, I don't have enough to make a single item that I needed. Of course they are for sale, but if I chose to spend the 10m isk it cost for the 40-50 of each salvage item type needed, I'd almost have bought one and saved the trouble of making it.
I like the game, but isk is a big problem for a new player in the 'developed' universe of Eve.
Just my take, no attitude intended. 
|

Zetjur Jilnou
Rapid Deployment Industries
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 02:38:00 -
[106]
Originally by: Xaen [Just in case you missed it, or they read your post, here's some greped out of my corplog with this little regex: "\\$.*[0-9]m\|[0-9]m.*\\$"
[ 2008.04.05 21:10:00 ] a8xwce > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.05 21:10:06 ] a8xwce > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.05 21:10:49 ] a8xwce > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.05 21:13:00 ] a8xwce > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:35:02 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:35:41 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:36:08 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:36:44 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:37:24 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:38:21 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:39:15 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:39:39 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:40:22 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:41:08 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:43:35 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:44:14 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:49:10 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+7%Free=$1723000M+7%Free=$2065000M+8%Free=$344www[snip]com [ 2008.04.06 23:49:51 ] z68xdh > www[snip]com 100M+6%Free= $6.991000M+6%Free=$691500M+6%Free=103 ISK and ITEMS2000M+7%Free=$1392500M+
See the timestamps?
Wait, you are claiming that that (2 different sellers two hours apart) is as much as it used to be? Dear lord, you truly are challenged. Every rookie system, every help/trade channel was hit every 10-15 minutes until 1.1, hardly any these days.
I take it you didn't bother to report the seller, judging by the way it was there for 15 minutes.
|

Ephemeron
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 02:59:00 -
[107]
I seriously think that GTCs are widely used by all the macro farmers with old character. I think that over the past year I have noticed a significant increase in the number of old (3+ month) noob corp isk farmers. If you think about it logically, the people who want to sell isk for real money aren't interested in paying real money for their EVE accounts. Before GTCs, they restricted themselves to trial accounts. With GTC option, they can channel some of their farmed ISK into paying for their legal game accounts.
In a sense, those isk farmers take another player's money (in form of GTC) and give him the isk. EVE is setup in such a way that older characters - ones that can fly battleships, have much greater opportunity to make lots of isk. Raven battleship happens to have the lowest skill requirement plus extremely versatile for NPC farming. That explains why virtually all 0.0 noob corp NPC farmers fly Ravens.
The bottom line is, while GTCs introduce competetion to isk farmer service, lowering price of isk, they also ENCOURAGE isk farmers to get more skilled characters that are able to farm isk much faster than 2 week trial accounts.
|

Max Kolonko
Caldari Domini Umbrus Free Trade Zone.
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 05:10:00 -
[108]
CCP - allow us to use this "safe ETC trade" with automatic purchase option, so we can buy gametime code directly in there and dont have to look for it in some remote stores (and hope its not a scam)
this way if you want to trade for isk, or just pay for someone character play-time you can do it faster Max Kolonko |

Moostang
DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 05:14:00 -
[109]
Originally by: Tzrailasa
Originally by: Moostang
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Help us raise awareness about this whole issue and together we can change the world of EVE for the better!
Do something about the re-tar-ded log off tactics and we can help you alot more. It is too easy for farmers to simply CTRL-Q to evade hostiles. Logging out of the game in hostile territory should NEVER BE A WAY OUT OF A FIGHT!
I agree completely....
Not only for farmers, but also certain other groups known for logoffski'ing to avoid fights 
I totally agree. I have never nor will I ever log off to avoid a fight. I personally believe that logging off should be a process and that there ONLY be 2 ways to insta log.
a) log off in a station b) click log off, wait for a shown log off timer to expire, set at say 2 or 5 minutes, then it will insta log.
With this, if you just ctrl q your ship will stay in game for 15 minutes, which is the same amount as the agro timer keeps you in game.
Moostang Darkstar 1 Goonswarm
Priceless Necro Thread |

Typhado3
Minmatar Ashen Lion Mining and Production Consortium STELLAR LEGION
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 05:59:00 -
[110]
Originally by: Moostang
I totally agree. I have never nor will I ever log off to avoid a fight. I personally believe that logging off should be a process and that there ONLY be 2 ways to insta log.
a) log off in a station b) click log off, wait for a shown log off timer to expire, set at say 2 or 5 minutes, then it will insta log.
With this, if you just ctrl q your ship will stay in game for 15 minutes, which is the same amount as the agro timer keeps you in game.
off topic but also seconded. I still think the best way to do this will be in ccp's current plans to remove local so macro's can't tell instantly when they are about to be jumped... just make sure they can't just leave a noob alt perma scanning the gate to tell the other accounts when to log off.
|

Kydra
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 06:02:00 -
[111]
Edited by: Kydra on 10/04/2008 06:04:29 Hi there Everyone! =)
Originally by: Z010
Originally by: Kayscha This just offers RMTers a safe loophole at slightly reduced profits and requiring an extra step, selling time cards for cash at a discount.
Hardly that. In one sense, and one sense only are they the same. People with cash can buy isk. However, the cash is going into the game (i.e. CCP) and this assists further development of the game. For the seller the isk is used to speed up a process in the game. When it is not ETC the cash goes to a person/people with no interest in EvE other than to make real money from players.
Personally - I have sold GTC via the ETC interface. It is simple, and it is dangerous - in that it can become an addiction - why mine that belt for XXX hours/days when you can sell a GTC and go buy your new EvE gadget, blueprint, etc..
However, I also admit that it has kept me in the game - if I had had to earn all the isk I needed to get my first eve commerce activity going I would have left the game. Eve requires a vision and time, but that is not always "fun". On the otherhand - eventually I hope to buy GTC regularly with the isk I am finally starting to make from these ventures. First I need to get my jump freighter built - about 40% there.
I agree with Z010 in many ways, up to and including the fact that ETC selling has kept me playing EVE. Through the sale of a few ETCs I have been able to persue my EVE visions. I've loved every minute of playing EVE since.
I don't have the time in my life to play the hours necessary to generate the funds I need to make my little dreams come true. Being stuck with characters that can do amazing things but lacking the funds to persue those dreams is very frustrating. I used to seduce my boyfriend *giggles* =) for money to do the things I wanted to do. Now I have the freedom to safely and securely do them myself, without resorting to the leather. LOL =)
I understand and even envy those that have the capability to play EVE for all the hours that it takes to make the serious money that it takes to do some things. I understand that they may be frustrated with those of us who take the short route. But in the end, it is my belief that having fun with EVE is the goal of CCP for all real players. Does the trade of ETCs really impact on your ability to have fun in the game?
All in all, I believe that CCP is doing a wonderful job. I also believe that, no matter what anyone says, they have their customers interests at heart, if only because keeping your customers happy is in the interest of higher profit margins. They must be successful because when I log in, they consistantly show 20,000 to 40,000 players online. People must be happy or they wouldn't be playing the game.
Anyway, cheers to CCP and all they are doing for us! 
Thank you,
Kydra
|

namebee
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 06:37:00 -
[112]
I have the ISK but not know to how trade?
|

namebee
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 06:39:00 -
[113]
Who the demand ISK can contact me!
|

Massage Lady
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 07:12:00 -
[114]
If we dob in people who we know have used illegal means to obtain isk - is there a reward (ie some of their isk, or other assets siezed, etc) if there is, then expect a big helping hand, otherwise CCP... you're own your own :)
|

TeknoRob Plus
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 07:53:00 -
[115]
Originally by: Zetjur Jilnou Edited by: Zetjur Jilnou on 08/04/2008 14:11:35
Originally by: Kayscha This just offers RMTers a safe loophole at slightly reduced profits and requiring an extra step, selling time cards for cash at a discount. CCP gains in the short run by saturating this intermediate market with its 'currency', namely time cards. Players might profit in the long run by effectively having reduced monthly costs for playing, possibly with the futher incentive to have more players willing to spend those reduced fees, increasing EVE player base.
Is this worth the trade-off? I don't know. What I object to is the fact that CCP will not state the issue as it clearly is.
Damn this board, BTW, had a really good answer typed and I just got a blank screen and all my hard work gone :(
If you can't completely prevent RMT, what's so bad about having RMT in a way that stops most of the negative aspects - the farming, the hacking and so on?
Nothing wrong with that, except the cost for ISK will go up heaps and ccp will maintain profits because of the GTC purchases...
If CCP are all for RMT in a *secure* manner, why not allow traders to become "CCP certified" through thorough testing at the expense of the sellers?
This whole section of eve is a bit.. iffy _ Wanted: Schr÷dinger's cat Dead AND Alive |

AeonOfTime
Minmatar Syrkos Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 08:38:00 -
[116]
Anything done to impede the progress of macro-activities and RMT is a good thing. I am doubtful about the effect of the player base's help however. I remember mining in Oremmulf a while back, where six macrominers were at work 23/7. Mining there myself, I gathered intel on them for about three months to make sure which were real macrominers and finally filed a petition with a detailed summary of the information I had. I got an answer alright, but only one of those prewritten "dummy" messages saying "we're doing all we can, thank you very much".
And what's more, all those miners continued crunching away at the belts unhampered. Disgusted, I moved to a new belt way out there to finally have some peace. If CCP does not take my help seriously, I don't see how I can help in the first place.
So all this fuss now about RMT makes me want to see some tangible effects before I even consider helping again, even if the spam filters seem to be working okay. -- Read the captain's log at eve.aeonoftime.com The solo player's corporation - Syrkos Technologies |

Excetra
Minmatar Royal Assassins
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 09:44:00 -
[117]
Edited by: Excetra on 10/04/2008 09:48:38
Originally by: Eleana Tomelac I have a question about buying ETC/GTCs...
I noticed the lack of french resellers, even if the sinclair site has a french version, half the labels are in german, I just can't catch a word of german... Same for other countries of EU... Many english speaking sites that end all being from north america...
So, any plans on more local resellers or should we buy from the eve-online official shop?
Any resellers that sell GTCs in stores and not just online?
All this is not so important, but when I have newbies asking me about GTCs in my corp and searching for the best way to buy in france, I don't know what's the best to answer, and for those without a credit card, having some physical stores selling GTCs would help them greatly.
try it here? http://www.evetimecode.com all u need or best u could use for this is PayPal. its easy and fast. u will get the codes in like under 5 minutes. first time they will actually call u though to verify that u did ordered it and after that ur in their database and it wont take more than 5 minutes [usually 1-2 mins.]
oh and FIY, this site is linked to the EVE official website so its not 100% riskfree just cus I say so and have experience with, but also CCP trusts it since it has it linked on their site.
E.
-------------------------------------------
|

Digital Anarchist
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 10:29:00 -
[118]
One thing not mentioned here is that isk selling does not affect all players equally. And in fact, some forms of "unfair play" counter each other.
Macro mining makes (low end) minerals cheaper. This is good for pvpers and manufacturers, as their costs tend to decrease.
On the other hand, macro NPC-ing increases the supply of isk, which tends to create inflation, but also increases the supply of faction items.
I'm not buying the argument that players are harmed in particular. That's because nobody is compelled to pursue a certain playstyle. So if macro miners are ruining one's AFK mining operation, he can pursue other activities.
It is also an incentive for CCP to make the game more varied and to steer it toward areas not easily replicated by macro-automatons or enjoyed by farmers.
But the main point I see to CCP's side in banning some forms of RMT is self-protection from tax authorities. So long as CCP holds such a policy, there is less of a risk of governments encroaching on the rights of Eve players; or regulating the activity of CCP. This is a policy I can support and understand.
------------------------ This space for rent |

Haemis
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 11:33:00 -
[119]
Problem with IP banning is that not every ISP gives susbcribers permanant IP addresses. Also when 3G / HSDPA network finally gets up to speed the networks only have a finite pool of IP address to allocate.
If i was to run EVE over orangeinternet (Orange UK Public APN) there are only so many IP's available. If a user does not pass traffic for 3 minutes the network begins to tare down the session and the IP alocated to the device as well as the one allocated on the internet facing part of the network will be taken back and placed back into the pool and they would be picked up by another user.
When the user re-established a new PDP connection they would be allocated another IP address from the pool
|

jinius
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 12:15:00 -
[120]
i bought isk and now am neg over 300 mil, my fault of course should have read into it before i did it, but if i would have known about the whole gtc thing i would have gladly done that instead, now i can't even sell of items too make up for the money, really would have been nice if this would have been brought to light a long time ago.
|

What'hat
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 12:29:00 -
[121]
Originally by: jinius i bought isk and now am neg over 300 mil, my fault of course should have read into it before i did it, but if i would have known about the whole gtc thing i would have gladly done that instead, now i can't even sell of items too make up for the money, really would have been nice if this would have been brought to light a long time ago.
Have you tried reading the EULA?... You know, the one they stick up in your face, when you make a new account?
It says quite clearly what happens to your account if you buy ISK... Maybe you should read it next time...
|

Huberek Morchu
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 12:40:00 -
[122]
Personally Im against players being able to pay to get ahead, but meh. This system at least helps get rid of the isk for cash side of things.
|

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 13:18:00 -
[123]
Originally by: Blazde
In other words the statement in bold from the devblog is completely false? It's merely a bit more pricey than doing it illegally, and takes a bit longer. I've watched people buying titanesque numbers of GTC and sell them in a few days. Not as easy as dialing 1800-ISKPLS I'll admit but it does have the benefit of being a lot safer.
I don't mind if CCP want to allow GTC trading, it's their game. I personally wouldn't, but it's not my choice.
What I do have a problem with is the dishonesty (or ignorance) about the real effects of such a descion.
People buy titans with real life money via the GTC system. Fact. People fuel wars with real life money via the GTC system. Fact. Game balance is affected by the GTC trading system. Fact.
Devs being upfront and open with players is one of the things that first attracted me to this game. Fortunately it seems a GM wrote this misguided paragraph not a dev so hopefully all is still well.
Financing a war by selling gtcs... Well that shows just how good that war is going 
160mil a pop, 15$ each, now a titan cost what? 50ish bil base, 50ish bil for skills/bp 100billion/160million comes out to 625 gtcs, $9375... for a game  and thats not counting the massive amounts of hauling or holding sovereignty at all
oh and not to mention dropping that many gtcs into the market would most likely drop the value, or is the gtc demand way stronger then i ever could have guessed?
mommy why do the rich kids get to plop more quarters into the arcade machines 
|

Xaen
Caldari Caritas.
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 13:44:00 -
[124]
Originally by: Chainsaw Plankton mommy why do the rich kids get to plop more quarters into the arcade machines 
So that the poor kids can play the game for free?
I don't have a problem with it since it's other players they're buying isk from. - Support fixing the UI|Suggest Jita fixes|Compact logs |

Sensei Cohiba
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 13:53:00 -
[125]
To all the people who complain about "look at the ice belts, its full of macro miners" there is no way of noing that for true.
I have usually at least 8 toons mining ice all together all day. To any observer, they look like a macro fleet... but Im no macro! Im sitting there clicking away. I sell the ice, transfer to my main. and I transfer BIG sums.
Ok - now pretend I was selling that isk for real money. You would say "track who I make 'donations' to" but its not that easy. The professional isk sellers dont transfer money. They legitimately buy modules off the market for billions of isk, leave these items (top faction implants etc) in secure cans in space, and pick up the items in disposable alts which are used to sell the isk in case they get caught. This is incredibly hard to track, and the accounts you catch are the 'disposable' ones used to sell isk that have no skills.
The ice macro fleets are untouched as they have done nothing more illegal than jettison secure cans worth billions for their alts to pick up and sell to customers.
...so how do CCP distinguish between professional real money farmers and me, a by-the-book farmer who just has a ****load of toons and mines ice for his whole alliance?
my 3 pence. 
|

Reptzo
Master Miners
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 13:53:00 -
[126]
Personally, i feel that the arguments against RMT go hand in hand with multiple accounts. Since multiple accounts is essentially a form of RMT. You can afford to pay more, so you get more advantage, by being able to constantly have a wingman or 2 or 3.
That being said, I think the GTC system is the best way to combat RMT. And I see nothing wrong with having multiple accounts.
I am just saying that RMT and multiple accounts essentially do the same thing, they enable players with more cash to be "better". So you can't really argue against one without arguing against the other.
|

Stickletodd
Amarr Royal Amarr Institute
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 14:43:00 -
[127]
Being kind of new to Eve, I am not at all sure how the GTC thing works. How do I buy GTC to sell? Do I have to have a web site? If I have to set up an external business to sell GTCs to make money, then the expense of playing the game goes way up. Where is the market for selling GTCs?
|

Reptzo
Master Miners
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 14:59:00 -
[128]
Originally by: Stickletodd Being kind of new to Eve, I am not at all sure how the GTC thing works. How do I buy GTC to sell? Do I have to have a web site? If I have to set up an external business to sell GTCs to make money, then the expense of playing the game goes way up. Where is the market for selling GTCs?
Go here http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=channel&channelID=544711 and all will be answered for you.
|

Marcus Aureliuz
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 15:02:00 -
[129]
The big question I have is why is it against the EULA to BUY the ISK but its NOT against the EULA to SELL it? Seems the wrong way to go about things. If you can ban a player for buying it you should be able to legally go after the companies that sell it. After all it's YOUR game and YOUR rights as the manufacturer they are in violation of. I had a friend banned from eve back when contracts were escrow because a, "known isk seller" purchased his items from escrow. It's left a bad taste in my mouth ever since and I hardly use the contract system out of fear that a, "know isk seller" might buy an item I put up there since we have no control over who picks up those items.
I fully support CCP's attemtps to nail the ISK buyers and sellers however the methods being used do not seem fair to the players that are doing things that are legit.
|

Ki Anna
Ki Tech Industries
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 15:49:00 -
[130]
Edited by: Ki Anna on 10/04/2008 15:49:57
Originally by: Marcus Aureliuz The big question I have is why is it against the EULA to BUY the ISK but its NOT against the EULA to SELL it?
Did you bother to check the EULA before posting.
Originally by: EULA B. Selling Items and Objects You may not transfer, sell or auction, or buy or accept any offer to transfer, sell or auction (or offer to do any of the foregoing), any content appearing within the Game environment, including without limitation ...
Not only to do they specify that you cannot sell or auction items, you cannot even offer to sell or action items. CCP can ban ISK sellers for simply making the offer even without completing the transaction.
|

Todd Doughnut
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 16:03:00 -
[131]
It would also help the game greatly, if instead of merely banning isk traders we were also allowed to PERSECUTE macroers. I recently set 3 of my characters to -10 sec status by blowing up their zombie haulers for a few hours. Viewing the combat logs it should be obvious that they were macroers at a glance.
1. they had charnames that were strings of numbers (i.e. jimmy 001, jimmy002 for example) 2. No response to my prolonged devastation whatsoever. 3. predictable, time-symmetrical behaviour over long periods of time.
Couldnt we have a new petition ---> Report a Macro petition. And can I have my sec status back? 
|

Cosa Nostradamus
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 16:14:00 -
[132]
Why doesn't CCP take as strong as action against the isk farmers as they do against the isk buyers? Macro groups are not hard to spot, yet I don't see them being cut off at the knees. They can be found in any hi-sec ice field in the game. If CCP really cares about the gameplay that much, they would put more effort into punishing the supply chain as well as the demand. |

Ki Anna
Ki Tech Industries
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 16:36:00 -
[133]
Originally by: Todd Doughnut 3. predictable, time-symmetrical behaviour over long periods of time.
Of the criteria you listed only one of them indicates that you are dealing with a macro.
There is no policy against the use of sequencial names.
There is no policy that requires players to respond to your actions.
There are plenty of reasons why a real player would choose to name their characters sequencially.
There are plenty of reasons why a real player would choose not to respond to your "prolonged devastation."
If you have evidence of time-symmetrical behaviour, then submit that in a petition. Otherwise you have nothing.
|

Hokage Jiraiya
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 16:38:00 -
[134]
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Another thing is scale. The regular player who wants a few hundred millions in his wallet will have no problem using the Secure ETC Trading System for this purpose, while at the same time helping another EVE player pay for his subscription. Supply and demand dictates that it would be very difficult for an individual to gather tens of billions of ISK with the secure system and thus game balance will not be upset. Corporations, or even Alliances, should not be able to fuel their wars and other activities like they have done in a number of cases with ISK bought for real world money.
Oddly enough I know numberous people who buy stacks of 10 to 50 GTCs, my 2year old could tell you that 170mil isk x 10 30day GTC = 1,7bil .......
As usual hypocritical and one sided unjustified random "let's make funny logic" posting by CCP yet again! Stop talking to us like 2year olds even my daugther hates that! CCP Publie Relationship epic fail as usual.
Re macro haulers in metropolis :/ many many Red Alliance alts, just keep ganking those haulers and presto all the RA alt and pet corps come to the rescue. You would think CCP would get rid of those macro haulers after complains from numberous people over a period of 1year.
|

InnerDrive
Shiva Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 18:31:00 -
[135]
Edited by: InnerDrive on 10/04/2008 18:33:51 Keep up the good work CCP! BURN THEM DIRTY ISK SELLERS/BUYERS!
As for those that keep asking anoying questions about how much isk was caught/how manny people got banned etc etc... Jeeeeez does it really mather? Will it make a difference if it was 5000 or 2000 people? Your going to tell me you know the difference those 3000 more make? Seriously they coud have banned just 10 that made up 90% of the isk selling market...
Just lett them do their job and stop asking silly questions.
|

Buyerr
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 20:52:00 -
[136]
okey.. and here i was thinking that isk for real cash was bad because it destroyed the fair playground and equal opportunities for players to compete without having to pump hundreds of RL euro into the game, when it is not about any of this but just about CCP making the money and people getting a free gameplay and the rest can go f*** themself..
damn NOW i am totally enlightened and understand it all, it makes perfectly sense..
the EVAEAL dudes who gives isk for 2euro per 100mill and the ccp who gives it for 7 euro per 100 mill, but the eveail dudes are BAD mmmkay....
i think any kind of isk for real money is a problem and i don't care how you explain it, if you give isk (which is the "you can get it all with enough of this" in eve) for rl cash, then you have already totally broken that barrier...
"alliances should not be able to blablablablabla" ROBBISH! you are just saying "they shouldn't be able to do it WITHOUT US! making money on it ".. which is fine, just come out and say it, instead of trying to hide the fact that THAT is the problem...
and yes i see a big problem with isk sellers and they should be stopped, but a see a problem with ccp encouraging isk for rl cash (which gtc's are) too..
I declare war on stupidity |

Buyerr
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 21:01:00 -
[137]
Originally by: Reptzo Personally, i feel that the arguments against RMT go hand in hand with multiple accounts. Since multiple accounts is essentially a form of RMT. You can afford to pay more, so you get more advantage, by being able to constantly have a wingman or 2 or 3. .
shhhhh don't tell em that they are so far out in the water that even the ships will not reach them XD
but very well put I declare war on stupidity |

Rural Juror
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 21:47:00 -
[138]
So, just to get this straight. 1. Suicide ganking is ok 2. Can flipping is ok. 3. Gang invite/ganks are just fine 4. Spending your own money however you want is bad
I think its just another way CCP wants to corner the market on their product. Only they sell GTC only through them can you play EVE. They don't care about the player as long as the player keeps playing whatever else happens is ok with them. Just another cold heartless Corp trying to hold on to their market share by Crusading against something people know is inherently dangerous. You would have to be an idiot to give your credit card number to someone overseas selling intellectual property that belongs to a 3rd party. You deserve to get ripped off and CCP should just let it happen as they do every other way a player can get ripped off in game. |

Enosh
|
Posted - 2008.04.10 22:56:00 -
[139]
Edited by: Enosh on 10/04/2008 23:03:31 Edited by: Enosh on 10/04/2008 23:01:09 Edited by: Enosh on 10/04/2008 22:57:01 Eve, or something like it...
It takes a master to see the obvious. Hence the expression master of the obvious. What is obvious is that at first people buy an account *and* time for that account for RM, now people can just buy time for RM. For those that this is not apparent what we are witnessing is the release of the player condition here.
Before: Player + RM => Time for that Player only
After: RM => Time
So here we are fooling ourselves that this, still, is not working.
No economy works with such a onesided sink in place.
The missing part of this premise/economy/structure/world is
Time + Player => RM for that Player only
or simply
Time <=> RM
This way you have a nice little circle and things wont drop to zero value. Yes?
You might have noticed that ISK , the monopoly money of this game, and I stress the monopoly part which is what you try to fool yourself through, even when hiring economics professors, bless him and his crew, to brag that there is an economy in this game was not mentioned here. I used time, coz thats what the RW will bill you for.
So do not view those who revert to clandestine means as evil. In fact they are doing what you have not dared do so far, or are trying to do.
Let me put it another way. Seizures you worry about. People that can earn money from your game, maybe more than you do, do not worry about. Embrase it, for then your game will be worth playing!
Entertainment costs money. Who do you think in the end provides the entertainment? Your missions? Make a single player game then, and stick to that. On the other hand strive to provide for interaction and you move on and ahead with an online multiplayer game.
Some of the 400,000,000 people with brains that somehow are using 12% instead of 10% of capacity that can earn 10% of their colledge fees by making money from an online game, is no joke.
People will look to make money and people will make money to look.
Anyway, I would not have written this if not detected your respect for something you are trying to understand, that is the first step in solving any 'problem'.
Why do people play games? What kind of education are you providing? At some point you might be called to account for believing that education is imagination. But not just yet. So time is your friend, dont sell your friend short. Try.
|

Thelina
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 03:53:00 -
[140]
The hypocracy of this post is overwhelming. On one hand, CCP supports RMT through eve time cards, yet on the other they demonize it through other methods. You can't have it both ways and expect to maintain any shred of integrity. |

Beaukro
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 05:14:00 -
[141]
To stop the 'Real Money', stop the "Macros". In high-sec Ice fields some outfits run four Macros at a time, 24 hours a day. Now you can't convince me that they cannot be detected by EVE. One way to solve the problem (at least in Ice Fields) is to up the damage rate of the rats. If you're not watching your miner it gets popped. No macros.
|

Kuolematon
Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 07:59:00 -
[142]
Originally by: GM Grimmi Macro-mission runners is exactly what I mean. Sorry for the mix-up :)
Intresting. You can run missions with macros? Hmm..
"The Amarr are the tanking and ganking floating rods of goldcrap"
|

Eleana Tomelac
Gallente Through the Looking Glass
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 09:07:00 -
[143]
Originally by: Kuolematon
Originally by: GM Grimmi Macro-mission runners is exactly what I mean. Sorry for the mix-up :)
Intresting. You can run missions with macros? Hmm..
FoFs + passive tanking, only a few buttons to hit...
An ishtar against guristas, I can cook and run guristas missions with mine... If there's not much repop (or they pop drones), last time I had to run to the kitchen not to burn everything, I lost a few drones on a repop.
If you think about it, it's incredible how boring you can make the game if you put wits in it, which means you can automate it.
That's why I prefer running missions with gunboat HACs and CS, at least, there's some fun.
What is not fun and offers no challenge can be macroed easyly... -- Pocket drone carriers (tm) enthousiast !
Assault Frigates MK II |

3V3
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 09:28:00 -
[144]
I always found the spam control in EVE satisfactory, without knowing how much effort it might have been for CCP, I've clearly been bothered a lot less by spam in EVE, than in other games.
The ETC trading is the most brilliant solution I've seen in any game so far, as it is founded on the basic realisation that if there is no legal way to buy alcohol, you're just growing the black market to new hights, thereby increasing crime.
Now, if you can get 300 ship fleet battles to work one day, I will never ask for another patch or update again :)
|

BigWhale
Gallente TGB Foo Corp
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 09:32:00 -
[145]
What is the difference between selling ETC and buying ISK? It seems that both actions end with the same thing. Someone got richer in the game by the means of 'out of the world money'. True.
But the main difference is that in the ETC case someone used that ISK to extend their membership. So in a way by selling ETCs for ISK the seller makes it possible for buyer to play the game. As someone said it would take A LOT of ETCs to 'fuel a war'. And this kind of trade doesn't have much impact on in game market. Buying ISK for $ or Ç for that matter is quite different thing. It can hava much bigger impact.
Why are macroers bad? Because they have too much influence on the market. Make mining an arcade game! ;)
-- R, U & Y are letters, not words... |

hornnorth
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 10:13:00 -
[146]
Originally by: Vyger
Originally by: GM Grimmi If you need ISK, then please use the Secure ETC Trading System.
No. How about playing the game.
Disagree with you entirely about GTC. If people have difficulty paying with the existing methods then provide alternative methods, ie. one's that don't involve giving players a means of converting RL money to ISK.
Just a personal opinion though, from one of your 5 year vets.
Quite right, it's still trading RL money for ISK and it screws the in game "economy" and unbalances the game, those with RL money to burn can dominate the markets and general game play |

Thathys
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 10:43:00 -
[147]
Jeesus am i tired of this discussion... Arrgh!!
Stop all Isk trading!! Or allow 1x30 day ETC for 30 days!
Some say it's good to be able to pay for game time with Isk,sure it's great. So limit it to game time and not Isk stacking!!
If all players bought their game time with Isk,what would CCP earn then!!??
0:-
Or am i wrong?
ONLY WAY TO MAKE THE ISK PROBLEM GO AWAY,IS TO HAVE 100% HAPPY CUSTOMERS!! Thats what we are,so put some effort into customer service and people will be loyal.
or maby i'm wrong.....
|

WA Dragon
Caldari Once More Unto The Breach
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 11:15:00 -
[148]
Edited by: WA Dragon on 11/04/2008 11:20:03 I am sorry and don't wish to sound like a troll but we have heard this all before yet the macros and isk sellers have very much grown in numbers rather than become less in the time I have played this game. Being 100% sure a player is a macro is hard to do. Every computer game has its cheats in it why should EVE be any differant. I have reported many obvious macros with out seeing action by CCP or any results in the particular macro being stopped. One of the hardest macros to spot but not impossible are the supervised macro, the office worker who run a macro bot while they are at work, may be on a lap top next to them.
As I see it CCP wont take banning action on any one be they macros or isk sellers because macros and isk sellers make up a good percentage of actualy Real Money Paying eve players.
It don't take a maths genius to work out CCPs losses of takings each month.
Please lets stop kidding our selves here, its all about SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!!
I am afraid to say from where I am standing it looks to me like the score in the game of CCP v macros and isk sellers is CCP 0 - Macros 10,000 
I say name and shame them show us your results in the fight against these bad guys. Dont give us blarg blarg blarg and expect us to swallow it.
Upon refelxtion what is the main componant to all of this problem....well think about it .....ITS THE GTC SYSTEM simply do away with being able to buy a GTC and 99% of the problem goes away, its as simple as that.
To be or not to be......sorry can you repeat the question? |

Svekke
Minmatar Frequent Flyers Tartarus Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 11:43:00 -
[149]
At the end of the day when more and more people try funding their ingame wallet with GTC the GTC prices will go down resulting in a higher $ / isk rate.
Right now it's 150 mil for a 30 day gtc.(15$) That's 10 mil per 1$.
Looking at the first thing I googled I saw you can buy 10 bil for 571$ as cheapsest. This rates to 17 mil per 1$.
And now this is pure hypothetically speaking, what I see happening is first of all more people will commence the secure GTC thing to get secure isk for their money. Prices will drop even lower as the offer will keep growing. Then you'll have a group of people realizing they can buy isk from an isk seller. Say they buy isk for 20$ and get 340 mil, add 10 mil and they can buy a 90 day GTC. Where does this become weird?
Let me illustrate:
GTC Buyer pays $68 to CCP
ISK Seller buys 1 GTC for 350 mil isk GTC Buyer buys 340 mil isk from ISK seller for 20$ GTC Buyer buys GTC from GTC seller for 350 mil isk
CCP got 68$ from 2 90dGTC's ISK Seller got 90dGTC from GTC seller. ISK Seller got 20$ from ISK buyer. GTC Seller got 700 mil for his 68$ Isk Buying GTC Buyer got 90dGTC for 20$
My point here is ISK sellers can sustain themselves indefinitely funding their accounts with their own isk. Giving them 99.9% profit. 0.1% goes to the employee who probably earns like 5 cents a day.
Because they have no life and plenty of time to do it.
|

Sophia Stormbringer
Lightning Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 11:53:00 -
[150]
Nice blog post. You forgot to mention the players who are trying to disrupt the isk sellers by themselves though.. These people invest their own hard earned isk into suicide runs against the macroers who are being protected by concord. Maybe it is possible to remove concord protection from these macroers? :) |

Masazak
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 11:57:00 -
[151]
Edited by: Masazak on 11/04/2008 11:58:44
Originally by: GM Grimmi Edited by: GM Grimmi on 08/04/2008 13:25:52 Hi,
Macro-mission runners is exactly what I mean. Sorry for the mix-up :)
Grimmi, can you please edit the blog and change 'mission runners' to 'macro mission runners'. It is important.
Thanks
|

Svekke
Minmatar Frequent Flyers Tartarus Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 12:04:00 -
[152]
Sophia, I'm pretty sure suicide runners don't just blow up their ravens if there's nothing to gain. 1. Insurance, 2. The loot that's dropped from the macroers. I'm still wanting to see a suicide runner blowing up someone with an empty cargohold :) |

Gibmundur
Amarr Celestial Apocalypse Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 12:10:00 -
[153]
Hypocrites. |

Arlon Magistar
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 12:28:00 -
[154]
Originally by: Svekke I'm still wanting to see a suicide runner blowing up someone with an empty cargohold :)
Happens all the time, unfortunately. I personally lost a perfectly good Wreathe that way about 3 weeks ago -- gate-ganked in 0.5 on my way to pick up an item I had contracted to myself. (Had an alt who needed items moved from point A to point B; the alt cannot fly a hauler, ergo I contracted the item to my primary to move it with him.) The ganker made the classic mistake of podding his kill; the last thing I saw before waking up in a new clone back at Elgoi was a CONCORD warning to the ganker announcing that, basically, he was now dead meat. Was this a player aiming for macros, or simply a pirate too foolish to do his deeds a safe distance from CONCORD intervention? I'll never know. If it be the former -- someone needs to be more careful not to pop real players in haulers. If it be the latter ... meh. I came back a few days later and got my item anyways. POint being, such things DO happen. Empty haulers do get ganked. Just FYI.
|

Arlon Magistar
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 12:36:00 -
[155]
Originally by: Sophia Stormbringer Maybe it is possible to remove concord protection from these macroers? :)
PLease...PLEASE do. If it can be done, Sophia's idea is an excellent one. Do that, and I'll bring out my Cyclone to hunt them down personally. I'd LOVE to get guns on some of those idiots stripping all the high-sec belts. Upping rat damage isn;t a bad idea either. Real players can simply rekit our ships to deal with the rats. Macroers will be in a world of hurt. Another excellent idea.
|

Agent Li
Caldari Galactic Defence Consortium BLACKHAWK FEDERATION
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 13:13:00 -
[156]
I've been reporting every ISK selling spammer I've seen.
I wish that all of this isk buying would go away - it's really ****ing me off to see a 5 day old character with 500 million isk flying around... ------------------
Let me show you around. That's my lab table, and this is my workstool. And over there is my intergalactic spaceship. And here's where I keep assorted lengths of wire. |

Jet Collins
Dynamic Endeavors
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 13:55:00 -
[157]
Edited by: Jet Collins on 11/04/2008 13:56:07 Sorry if I have been out of the loop for a while on some of this stuff but I was wondering why this is in the new patch.
- The overseer structure from the mission "Angel Extravaganza" has been removed and the mission re-enabled.
Thanks
PS I can't view pages 2-5??? Dynamic Endeavors is now Recuiting.!!
Contact me in game for deatails about the corp. Mostly a PvE corp, with Jump clones avaiale in Empire and 0.0. |

Hamfast
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 14:01:00 -
[158]
Originally by: Sophia Stormbringer Maybe it is possible to remove concord protection from these macroers? :)
Great idea... but how can you do this and not pull the protection from the rest of the players?
I would love to see the numbers of accounts banned by CCP, the Numbers of ISK taken out of the system... but care must be taken to punish the guilty... not the poor guy next to him trying to feed his POS or get enough Isogen to build that next ship...
--------*****--------
Learn and be informed, because a Politicians worst nightmare is an informed voter...
So choose your CSM Candidates wisely
|

TeknoRob Plus
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 14:08:00 -
[159]
Originally by: Agent Li it's really ****ing me off to see a 5 day old character with 500 million isk flying around...
What difference does it make? a 5-day old character can't fly **** all anyway... _ Wanted: Schr÷dinger's cat Dead AND Alive |

Smilla Snow
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 14:09:00 -
[160]
Hmm, the biggest Problem in EvE are the Macros.
I'm shure CCP does not like RMT because they dont get a fee for it ;-), but to be honest - Macros are the bigger Problem.
Try to catch the Macros and your RMT Problem is near gone!
|

Agent Li
Caldari Galactic Defence Consortium BLACKHAWK FEDERATION
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 14:09:00 -
[161]
Originally by: Hamfast
Originally by: Sophia Stormbringer Maybe it is possible to remove concord protection from these macroers? :)
Great idea... but how can you do this and not pull the protection from the rest of the players?
I would love to see the numbers of accounts banned by CCP, the Numbers of ISK taken out of the system... but care must be taken to punish the guilty... not the poor guy next to him trying to feed his POS or get enough Isogen to build that next ship...
Investigate the macroers first. Then set their security status to -10, and zero out their wallets.
------------------
Let me show you around. That's my lab table, and this is my workstool. And over there is my intergalactic spaceship. And here's where I keep assorted lengths of wire. |

Smilla Snow
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 14:22:00 -
[162]
and disable trade, contract and market buttons.....
|

TalaLawi
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 15:46:00 -
[163]
It's bad enough that one has to watch for these things in the "real world", but to have to contend with it in Eve, which is for many, a game for people to get away from the greed and corruption of the real world and to have a simple break from such 'darkness' and simply have some innocent enjoyment. When I first learned of this level of corruption in Eve I felt disappointed that it even exist's within something as simple as this game ( not that this game is simple ).
"Buying ISK for real money IS against the EULA and will be punished appropriately" would be a good way to raise awareness of these problems."
"this devblog should be advertised at logon too. Ignorance is not an excuse, but it is a factor when people want to buy isk. Education is a good weapon against RMT." "I am glad to hear you are taking steps to stop the RMT by not only punishing those you catch buying ISK, but by the mass banning of the farmers and macros that are collecting the ISK..."
I support CCP doing whatever they need to, to stop this completely. Get read of the scammers, cheaters, and their kind. We don't need them mucking up Eve. Get read of them all, and use whatever means it takes. Lets make this game stand out for its control over dishonest individuals who just want to spoil it for others. The real world has enough of that.
"This is what I really love about Eve and CCP - Zero-tolerance politics against RMT !!!"
"think it is great that CCP is going to do something about Macro Farmers and Macro Mission People.. they dont deserve to be involved with people who play for the fun and the challenge of Eve. Eve is so open to everyone and all you need is to get passed the learning curve and you can make it in the game the legit way. by running missions , minning and salvaging. ive been setting my schedule to all of these options...."
"All in all, I believe that CCP is doing a wonderful job. I also believe that, no matter what anyone says, they have their customers interests at heart, if only because keeping your customers happy is in the interest of higher profit margins. They must be successful because when I log in, they consistantly show 20,000 to 40,000 players online. People must be happy or they wouldn't be playing the game.Anyway, cheers to CCP and all they are doing for us!"
I have learned from all the comments posted, thanks to everyone who has taken the time to do so.
Those of us who are honest players, lets continue to play for fun, support CC, and help all we can to get rid of all the creeps who for whatever reason want to prey on others.
|

KineTiK
KINGS OF EDEN
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 16:13:00 -
[164]
Quote: When you buy an ETC and then sell it for ISK via the Secure ETC Trading System you are directly contributing to the growth of EVE as the code will be applied to an account and someone will be using it to play. Some players do not have the means to pay for their subscriptions with credit cards or similar and the Secure ETC Trading System helps them pay and play. The economics are quite different as well since wealth is redistributed between active members of the community rather than injected into the game.
That logic is flawed because: When one sells a GTC, Person A transfers isk to person B. When one buys isk off ebay, Person A transfers isk to person B. In both cases person B spends real money. The only difference being that in the second scenario the money doesn't go to CCP.
Where person A got all the isk from is another story. Either through macroing, farming 24 hours a day or buying it from other isk sellers. It doesn't matter. In the end it is isk being transferred for whatever reason and it's not being 'injected' as the post says. Obviously buying isk in such a way encourages the isk sellers to continue with their dodgy methods to obtain isk.
It wouldn't even surprise me if there are people selling tons of GTC's for isk, then selling that isk on ebay for a small profit and buying more GTC's. CCP gets paid, isk sellers get paid, guy with GTC is happy, guy who bought isk is happy. Yey, everybody wins.
If CCP is serious about stopping people from becoming far richer than they would possibly be had they followed normal game mechanics then they simply have to stop the GTC for isk thing. Yo momma so fat she got more chins than a Hong Kong phonebook. |

Spumantii
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 16:14:00 -
[165]
I can't ******* believe it.
"There are also the macro miners and mission runners, complex farmers and assorted rabble of this sort that causes general nuisance and keeps the regular players from being able to enjoy EVE as they would like. Price of minerals, ore, ice, implants and so on is driven down by this kind of activity and thus ways for normal players to make ISK are effectively ruined. Finally, the RMT element will not hesitate to commit real world crimes, such as credit card fraud or theft, to keep their business running."
MISSION RUNNERS? You now have a problem with one of the few things about this game I still like and would lump in half the eve population into a statement bashing a bunch of scumbags? Are you out of your tree?? Why haven't you changed your post? That takes the ******* cake, I am sick and tired of CCP making a piece of **** out of this game and making it as unfriendly as possible, and insulting the people who ACTUALLY KEEP this game running. You make it painfully obvious your intentions for this game include none of the 'rabble' in hi sec you just want to have a more stressful, annoying, frustrating and less predictable, less stable game than counterstrike since it's all going to be pvp. 'Rabble'. I have spent a looong ******* time getting my standings to where they are to be called 'Rabble' by ccp and be lumped in with scumbags. **** you. You've alienated thousands of player and now you can include me in that list. Screw you, I am done with you.
|

KineTiK
KINGS OF EDEN
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 16:20:00 -
[166]
Edited by: KineTiK on 11/04/2008 16:20:30
Originally by: Spumantii I can't ******* believe it.
rant...
See page 1. Somewhere halfway down... Yo momma so fat she got more chins than a Hong Kong phonebook. |

Spumantii
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 16:22:00 -
[167]
i just did, and don't care the post is bad enough and it won't be changed, furthermore what the hell is wrong with doing complexes to get your invention material?? If you (CCP) don't like something then STOP the implementation- NOT THE PLAYERS
|

Hamfast
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 16:24:00 -
[168]
Originally by: Agent Li
Originally by: Hamfast
Originally by: Sophia Stormbringer Maybe it is possible to remove concord protection from these macroers? :)
Great idea... but how can you do this and not pull the protection from the rest of the players?
I would love to see the numbers of accounts banned by CCP, the Numbers of ISK taken out of the system... but care must be taken to punish the guilty... not the poor guy next to him trying to feed his POS or get enough Isogen to build that next ship...
Investigate the macroers first. Then set their security status to -10, and zero out their wallets.
Running Macro's is against the rules, instead of going through the bother of setting their standing to -10, just ban them...
Bans can be reversed if the punished is found to not have been breaking the rules, banned accounts "Items" are effectivly removed from play... but not lost if the ban is reversed...
Setting their standing to -10 gets them popped and podded... then come to find out they did not break any rules...now what?
I am all for the bans, break rules, get banned... seems about perfect to me... Making a player (even a macro-farming RMT Supplier) into a pop up target is a bad idea. --------*****--------
Learn and be informed, because a Politicians worst nightmare is an informed voter...
So choose your CSM Candidates wisely
|

sliver 0xD
exiles.
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 17:37:00 -
[169]
pointless propoganda by ccp.
first of all this was known to everyone a year ago, that the eve comunity is already damaged by the illigal activities of RMT, macro npcer, macro miner and plex farmers.
and i find it stupid that the fair part of the eve comunitie should fix the illigal comunity while its ccp's job to keep the game fair and legal. those that buy illigal isk will probably not report themselfs anyway.
and i have been reporting allot of the illigal activity in eve for a every long time and with no results at all. (honestly whoever wrote this propoganda should ask back the 30min of his life becouse it was pointless :P)
ccp should change there aprouch and take hard action. every report of illigal acivity in eve reguarding RMT, macro npcing, macro mining and complex farming should be taken verry serious and should result in atleast 1 ban every time a report comes in!
ccp should show balls and takes some responsiblity. --- Somebody needs a hug! |

DOCBOMO
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 20:45:00 -
[170]
New ERA, why not go for a transposition of EVE ISK to challenge currnecy trading. Sad if in 20 years you find out EVE ISK could have been among the first new major currencies i.e. changing the ú.$ etc sytem, of course you would need more populations (e.g. all of France)to Log on. Just my thoughts from some one who started on ELITE on my old Spectrum and speculated in 20 years we could do what we do in Eve!! Why not let us all mine ad infinitum when off line? DO NOT CONSTRAIN YOUR HORIZONS BY CURRENT ECONOMICS> LOOK BEYOND and see what might be achieved.
DOC
|

Juno Azzabat
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 21:13:00 -
[171]
Yeah CCP please stop the GTC for isk thing!!!
|

Cetrius
|
Posted - 2008.04.11 21:26:00 -
[172]
Here Here!
<3 Dev's
|

TaxmanX
Caldari A little Of Everything
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 01:38:00 -
[173]
Although I applaud CCP's efforts to clean the galaxy of "Evil" (I am SO SICK of ISK spammers, ISK mailers, ISK guild applications) there ARE some huge problems concerning their methodology in doing so.
We have a relatively new corp-member who has been working VERY hard and dedicated MANY hours to character development, ship combat, mining, and working with the market. It is the latter that recently got his account tapped to the NEGATIVE ISK (-350mil to be exact) by CCP. Seems their tracking methodology has fingered and PUNISHED an innocent person.
What happened? Well he happened to pick up items on the exchange for a very cheap price. These items were being "sold" at the price for someone who purchased ISK to pick up and re-sell to "launder" the ISK or to sell on their own in exchange for real currency. I am sure the seller was a bit ****ed when the buyer was someone other than they expected!
Doesn't really matter - that he was just seeing something show up on the market for cheap and then selling them himself. He was labeled by CCP as a "buyer" or "launderer" because he happened to purchase the items (gee who wouldn't?) and then punished by putting him far in the negative "to teach him a lesson" they said in his GM responses.
So they didn't just take away his so called "ill-gotten-gains" they opted as per this new policy to set him FAR into the negative! Nobody really bothered to pull his recent manufacturing history to see he was making money by building things and mining the belts to pebbles to do it. Oh well, I bet they assume he was a Chinese Macro miner doing that using bots as well or something. Give me a break, I know this guy personally - he lives in Utah and is one of the most honest/sincere guys I know. :-/ He has been actively playing EVE since I introduced it to him in January, he even purchased a second account! He was aware that folks (as in all MMO's these days) were selling ISK, but he had no reason to do that because he was using the money HE EARNED by trading, mining, and mission running. CCP HAS the logs and data to see that - but NO... since he purchased items from an ISK seller.. he was INSTANTLY GUILTY (without any looking into his history). So much for ZERO TOLERANCE... how about ZERO detective work to go along with it?
So just a warning to all - in his behalf, don't buy anything that looks like a GOOD deal - because it will likely get your account put into the negative JUST BECAUSE YOU PURCHASED IT! It doesn't matter you HAD 800 mil before you even purchased it.. obviously you ARE A BAD PLAYER!
|

Sophia Stormbringer
Lightning Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 11:14:00 -
[174]
Edited by: Sophia Stormbringer on 12/04/2008 11:14:58 Wow, he got punished for accepting a _public_ contract?! Petition it and point to the fact that it was a public and not private contract. It cannot be that anyone who accepts a public contract can be accused of laundry.
|

Johnny Yuma
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 12:56:00 -
[175]
This has probably been recommended before, but why not just automatically kick EVERYONE who's an NPC corp for 30+ days into a special NPC corp that can be wardec'd for free. Real players could get out, by joining a player corp, or making their own, but at least then, the macro miners would be fair targets.
|

Enosh
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 16:14:00 -
[176]
Originally by: DOCBOMO New ERA, why not go for a transposition of EVE ISK to challenge currnecy trading. Sad if in 20 years you find out EVE ISK could have been among the first new major currencies i.e. changing the ú.$ etc sytem, of course you would need more populations (e.g. all of France)to Log on. Just my thoughts from some one who started on ELITE on my old Spectrum and speculated in 20 years we could do what we do in Eve!! Why not let us all mine ad infinitum when off line? DO NOT CONSTRAIN YOUR HORIZONS BY CURRENT ECONOMICS> LOOK BEYOND and see what might be achieved.
DOC
Ok in answer to this, which is in the same spirit of my post too, i will blog on here about all things EVE and what, in terms of economics, GTCs are.
Introduction Even as entertainment, MMO's are still taboo. Correlations of MMO players in the 20-30 bracket and their RL prosperity will for certain show that in most instances the RL(real life)-MMOgame swap is a losing trade, in RLM (Real Life Money). There are exceptions, yet in the end, as things stand (in life but in EVE too) people choose the world they live in anyway. MMO games just dont pay players bills.
Are MMO games in a position to do so? Yes. How? How do GTC feature into this?
Part 1 - The indirect way - Making money by participating in building and advancing the game's interface
WoW was the first game, imho, that, in a large scale, succeded in providing for user input. They allowed through an API such as EVE has, players with basic programming skills to evolve the feel and control of the user-game interface. It was a gamble, and it paid off, for Blizzard. There are numerous a site that offer WoW add-ons. They are predominantly free downloads with a donation option. I can't tell you how many donations the creators of these add-ons have received, yet I am sure they have. Some have become standards for the game in the game's expansions.
Blizzard provided for a basic user interface, a shell if you like, which is adequate, and laid its development on the community. The line between interface and control is a fine line in certain cases.
Knowledge is power, so is information, so, addons that remember for you, or alert you to critical events i.e. filter information through a priority list, are an advantage. Control sequences are an advantage too. Buff up + attack, simple enough an example. Saves me a button press.
Yet, the combination of these information and control addons is where you fine line lies. An addon which would provide a player with an 'unfair' advantage over the shell that Blizzard provided was beyond what Blizzard could deal with. Yet its not beyond the realm of possibility to automate or provide for formulation of tactics in, interactions through the game-player interface. There are currently games in development that give directional attack and defence options. Age of Conan anyone? Then there is Peter Molyneux who's idea is to use the object oriented nature of the environment in conjunction with player interaction to provide predefined sequences and interactions which maximise the locals potential, enhance and inspire through the game experience eg if, in the game environment, theres a toolbox on a table, pressing the attack button, will pick it up and throw it, in the same way that a charachter who has a pole for a weapon will try to maintain distance, while a knife holder will manouver to close that distance. Weapon category affecting optimal strike distance. So how abt providing the basic elements and let us sequence them into dynamic scripts, like the sequences in Martial Arts par example.
All this though is not really making money from the game itself. Its making money by enhancing the game's environment. In the end the numero uno interaction an MMO game provides, its comparative advantage, is player interaction and that, Blizzard got down to a gem ;)
|

Enosh
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 16:14:00 -
[177]
Part 2 - Making money by playing the game.
Now lets look at Second Life. Havent played it, I have read about it and about a collapse of its exchange rate to RL money. Why did the exchange rate collapse? Well, you can buy virtual space in the same way as you can go on sites that sell lunar real estate. Similarly but less so than lunar surface which is tangible, a virtuals space's worth is realated to what you can do with it and amongst other things, how you do what you do and how long it takes you to do it. It is obvious, that if i can trade with real money in a game, i dont need game money, so the exchange rate drops to zero.
Economics, they say is about demand and supply. Obviously for someone who has some money and time to spare its no feat to go in and buy stuff. So allowing for purchasing of game objects will soon lead to collapse of their price, simple because with a few keystrokes more can be created by the game's designers. So if 100 of real money is worth 4 of a certain 'rare' game object, by creating 4 more, that object is now worth 12.5 instead of 25. To see this, you have to appraise the value of the object from the designers point of view. Sentimentals aside, once done and paying, it was worth zero for him to create 4 copies, and there were 4 in circulation. I come in and buy 4 for 100, taking them out of circulation. The designer then puts another 4 in. If I were to sell my 4 for game-money, there are now 8 in circulation. Real money price has just droped to 12.5 a piece. No need to point that the game-money value also drops unless you take game-money out of circulation, by say making belt/mission rats harder for a while, so on aggregate runners earn less / or buy more ships.
So the power lies with real money. If you do allow for a full exchange facility you lose your game currency, you somehow would like to allow for people to earn money from other people but through playing the game. Laundering and Patriot act aside, you have to make sure you are in a position to offer the game through real money yet if you free yourself from the players, your are all the more uncertain of your games worth.
Time again is of the essence as are friends few and valued. So lets accept that and go from game to gametime. It is still the game though, the security you enjoy is guarded by the game's elements, for example, the skill-time relation. Will someday my charachter be worth more than I paid for him, inflation adjusted too? Yes, that is a fine measure of success, yet, is it beacuse there will be less people left in the game? So aim to adjust for that as well, as shall we, by offering out to other players should we opt to leave the game. It is safe and prudent to charge for the experience only. To go beyond though, there lies the prize.
So a GTC is worth real money. How much gamemoney is a GTC worth? If you were to allow for ingame GTC buying and selling through the Market Browser it is still for gamemoney, no worries there. Then again what would you really call it? What is the EVE universe made of? Is it ore? Is it ships? Is it skills?
What would it mean if GTCs were available in the ingame market browser and their value rose? What would it mean if GTC value fell. In each case its a function of supply and demand. If the value rises, there is either a reduction is supply of GTCs or more people demanding them. If it drops its either increased supply of GTCs or less people demanding them.
Say each person gets a GTMC, a GameTimeMinuteCard worth a months play less a max 1 hour daily downtime and given the congestion in Jita, would you say it would be of benefit to charge by minutes played? Alternatively would you rather train skills faster when logged off? Could I pay for faster skill training through GTCs? how much faster? and please do keep it non-liner. Would you charge more for game time in Jita? How much would people pay for game time in Jita?
|

Makula Trantor
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 17:09:00 -
[178]
There should be a way that pilots can report farmers - have it verified and then have a filter on the star map to show system locations and number of farmers there on the map in real time statistics - then us REAL pilots could go out and kill em dead all the time. It would be like killing rats except these would be farmers. Heck create agent missions that put bounties out on them. There would need to be a way to prevent abuse or appeal if you were wrongly placed as a farmer with a system like this.
|

Annabella Kora
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 17:30:00 -
[179]
"Help us raise awareness about this whole issue and together we can change the world of EVE for the better!" WRONG WRONG WRONG
YOU KNOW who is trading money -> "[...], and we remove tens of billions of illegally purchased ISK every day."
Just Ban them, BAN BAN BAN FFS
|

Pooka
Caldari United Space Aillance USA
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 17:45:00 -
[180]
Edited by: Pooka on 12/04/2008 17:46:10
 HEY!! 7 pages and no one has asked a question about this: "Corporations, or even Alliances, should not be able to fuel their wars and other activities like they have done in a number of cases with ISK bought for real world money." WHO? Which Corporations and did you ban them or not!! I can guess which ones you are talking about.
CCP comment please. |

Polnoch
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 19:27:00 -
[181]
Edited by: Polnoch on 12/04/2008 19:30:02 The point of this discussion is what?
CCP picks whom and how they want to punish people - and they do it.
There isn't anything anyone says here that will change anything.
|

TaxmanX
Caldari A little Of Everything
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 19:29:00 -
[182]
Originally by: Sophia Stormbringer
Wow, he got punished for accepting a _public_ contract?! Petition it and point to the fact that it was a public and not private contract. It cannot be that anyone who accepts a public contract can be accused of laundry.
Indeed - he did petition, found out it was the GM's that took all his hard-earned ISK.. not a keylogging hacker (that he first thought). The GM's told him about all of this - which was news to him. All he did was purchase goods at a great price - how would he know they were for supposed to be for somone else (who HAD purchased the ISK)? Because HE purchased the goods.. that made him guilty (no investigation) and then he was punished for it.
|

Beaukro
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 21:29:00 -
[183]
One of the first things that strikes a new player (after learning the rules) is the fact that the game is corrupt. When a new player can line the side of their screen with a list of people selling 'in game money' something is definitely amiss. By the time that same player attains the ability to mine ice with a 'Retriever' He/She encounters the Ice Fields or (Macro Mountains) Five minutes of observation is enough to observe how deep the corruption goes. Corruption feeds off the honest. So if you are unable or unwilling to match dishonest players dollar for dollar, and CCP refuses to correct the problem, there will come a time when you pick up your marbles or game controller and seek greener pastures.
|

J Valkor
Invicta.
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 21:57:00 -
[184]
A. A lot of people do not understand the difference between buying GTC's for ISK and buying cash for ISK. You cannot make a living on one of those things.
B. A lot of people want to justify their own behavior with a bunch of BS about how CCP is evil or some such nonsense. This ain't the real world, this is CCP's world. If you do not like their rules find another game.
C. A lot of other people want to scare the crap out of normal players by making up horror stories of how banning ISK sellers/buyers goes bad. With stories that are blatantly false is the best part.
D. Inflation in EVE is the lowest of any long running MMO I can think of. In a lot of instances items have gotten cheaper since release.
Whichever, no amount of complaints or crying will change CCP on these meta-decisions. Good thing, too.
|

Narf Commandude
|
Posted - 2008.04.12 23:41:00 -
[185]
Man I didn't really know that RMT was such a big problem.
I must admit that i've poked around a few sites, and thought about RMT for myself, but after reading the full effects on the game about it, i will never give it a second thought.
thanks for the insight! |

Druadan
Aristotle Enterprises Synchr0nicity
|
Posted - 2008.04.13 00:56:00 -
[186]
Edited by: Druadan on 13/04/2008 00:55:51 Will we ever see the GTC-for-ISK market removed from the game? In my opinion this is only slightly less worse for the game than the macroing-and-what-have-you ISK selling. It takes the cold-harsh level playing ground of EVE and turns it into a plastic-fantastic game of 'who's richest in real life'.
Earlier in the week I bought two GTCs, one for each of my account, forgetting that this account had auto-renewed with three months of gametime. So I sold the spare GTC on the GTC Marketplace. I feel like I'm using dirty money, as my real-life disposable income is deciding how affluent I am in the game. It's just not right.
-Dru |

LTcyberT1000
Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.04.13 02:30:00 -
[187]
Well, i think the main reason why EVE gets so lots of isk sellers/macro miners/etc is because of too much crowd in same EVE universe. Comparing with 3 years ago to ~5000 players and 3500 solar systems with ~35 000 players and same 3500 systems is a big difference. For normal player there is not enough space in these days. Try to look percentage not mined out belts with better ore than veldspar and scordite and i am sure it will be >90% of total belts wiped out right before downtime. Same is with 0.0 systems where people are "sitting" squized in crowds on top of each other.
CCP, player base expanded so much, and it is time to think about opening another EVE galaxy where ALL 40 000 players will fit like it was 3 years ago...
|

Anatal Klep
|
Posted - 2008.04.13 03:51:00 -
[188]
The blurb on RMT is one of the more disingenuous things I've read lately.
Problem 1: RMT fosters crime outside EVE. OK, but that is none of CCP's business. CCP is a game vendor, not Interpol. In addition, ISK buyers are not the bad guys and don't even know which sellers are bad guys. Caveat emptor.
Problem 2: RMT harms everyone because it messes up the EVE economy. CCP must have slept through Economics 101. This argument is rubbish because the inflation already exists due to cash cows in the game. To increase inflation the ISK must be spent and it doesn't matter if it is spent by the original ISK farmer or someone else making an RMT transfer payment. cash cow = inflation and RMT has nothing to do with that.
Problem 3: RMT encourages macro-play for ISK farming. True. But CCP could stop macro-play any time it wants with a few heuristics on player activities. The interesting question is: why doesn't CCP do that? CCP doesn't because...
Problem 4: ETC is Good -- for CCP! That's because CCP gets extra revenue from players who could not otherwise afford multiple accounts. So the ISK farming is allowed to ensure ETC purchases to finance those accounts through transfer payments from players who do have plenty of RM and want to buy their way into positions. But CCP doesn't get any revenue if those transfer payments are outside the game, so CCP tries to force all such RMT to be through ETCs by making ISK purchasers the bad guys.
[For the record: I don't buy ISK because I already make 9 figures a week trading and manufacturing -- without macros.]
|

Anatal Klep
|
Posted - 2008.04.13 16:30:00 -
[189]
Originally by: Sophia Stormbringer Maybe it is possible to remove concord protection from these macroers? :)
It would make some nice outdoor sport, but it also gets the wrong people killed. Back when I was mining people blew up my cans because they thought I was macromining since I had the obvious features: Hulk, hours on end mining out entire belts, NPC corp, etc.. In reality I just had a lot of time on my hands. Macromining is much more reliably detected in software using heuristics on player actions.
Shooting them really doesn't solve the problem anyway. That is done regularly in losec with no noticeable reduction in macromining. Ship insurance is cheap compared to profits and they use alts w/o implants to lose.
Much better is to kill the account. It takes a lot of SP investment to macromine effectively that one doesn't have on trial accounts. So the interesting question is: why doesn't CCP do that? They do, but apparently only on accounts they associate with RMT sales out-of-game.
The reality is that CCP needs the cash cows to support the extra income from GTCs so they don't eliminate cash cows directly, which they could do easily. They just don't want the transfer payments to be external so they go after the offline RMT buyers and sellers.
|

Anatal Klep
|
Posted - 2008.04.13 17:07:00 -
[190]
Originally by: LTcyberT1000 Well, i think the main reason why EVE gets so lots of isk sellers/macro miners/etc is because of too much crowd in same EVE universe. Comparing with 3 years ago to ~5000 players and 3500 solar systems with ~35 000 players and same 3500 systems is a big difference. For normal player there is not enough space in these days. Try to look percentage not mined out belts with better ore than veldspar and scordite and i am sure it will be >90% of total belts wiped out right before downtime. Same is with 0.0 systems where people are "sitting" squized in crowds on top of each other.
I agree; its a Hot Button for me. In fact, it is worse than that because the active player base is 5X larger who log on at different times. On average there are now almost as many players per region as there were for the entire game originally.
Another problem is that the gap between established positions and noob positions is vastly greater now. The days are long gone when one could make huge profits in T1 gear but the noob needs to grind all the way through T1 to get to T2 gear just to start a career in trade or manufacturing. IMO, that rather pointless initiation is a major factor in the offline RMT market. Noobs have to stare at a mining laser for months or run the same set of PvE missions a gazillion times to get enough ISK to play the game properly.
It took me 10 months to make my first 1b; 10 weeks to make the second; and 4 weeks to make the third. But by then I was still a Minor Leaguer who had just gotten a foot in the door. After 6 months in the game with reasonable skills the noobs still can't do much except be canon fodder in 0.0 wars. Small wonder buying ISK is appealing.
Quote: CCP, player base expanded so much, and it is time to think about opening another EVE galaxy where ALL 40 000 players will fit like it was 3 years ago...
I agree. The architecture isn't scalable for things like PvP, which is now essentially unplayable for fleet combat because of lag and lost keystrokes. But CCP insists on being odd-man-out in MMORPGs by dismissing the notion of replicated universes.
|

Anatal Klep
|
Posted - 2008.04.13 17:38:00 -
[191]
Originally by: J Valkor A. A lot of people do not understand the difference between buying GTC's for ISK and buying cash for ISK. You cannot make a living on one of those things.
Actually a living is made with both. CCP just gets the revenue for GTCs rather than a player. IOW, GTCs are part of CCP's living.
One can also argue that the player also earns a living indirectly. Ultimately GTCs allows players to play EVE when they could not otherwise afford to do so (e.g., additional accounts). In economic terms that is equivalent to a transfer payment from the game to the player's real income -- just like for an non-GTC ISK seller.
Quote: B. A lot of people want to justify their own behavior with a bunch of BS about how CCP is evil or some such nonsense. This ain't the real world, this is CCP's world. If you do not like their rules find another game.
I don't have a problem with that. What I have a problem with is CCP wrapping their motives in a bunch of sanctimonious nonsense about how what they are doing is for the good of the players when they are really playing hardball with their competition. If they were serious about that they would snip off RMT at its root by clamping down on cash cows. If the cash cow mechanisms were eliminated there wouldn't be an RMT "problem". But they don't because the cash cows fuel their GTC revenue.
Quote: D. Inflation in EVE is the lowest of any long running MMO I can think of. In a lot of instances items have gotten cheaper since release.
I agree up to a point. The inflation is low for T1 stuff because everyone has BPs and can compete. It is also true for ores/minerals because production is driven by the same technology and player count that drives production (i.e., there is supply/demand balance). But T2 stuff still has rediculously high prices and that is where the ISK ultimately goes. When T2 gear stabilizes, CCP will introduce T3 gear and the inflation will be there.
But note that if you are correct, then CCP's position that RMT inspires macro-play that causes inflation is incorrect. IOW, if there is no inflation in EVE, then macro-play isn't harming the game so that isn't a valid reason for banning external RMT.
|

Fleche
|
Posted - 2008.04.13 18:10:00 -
[192]
Originally by: Wyn Pharoh Short of invading [insert EVERY developing nation here], lining up and shooting ALL the ISK farmers worldwide in RL...
I volunteer.
Something important to realize about ISK sellers is that they use stolen credit cards to create accounts. This is the primary reason they are headquartered in countries that either turn a blind eye to CC theft of Westerners or who actively encourage it as a way to "stick it to the Man". Otherwise it would be easy to file a stolen CC complaint with the local authorities and get a nice high-profile set of arrests... not for violating game policies, but for good old-fashioned fraud and theft. But when the local "authorities" are at best indifferent, or more often bribed, options become limited.
IMNSHO, the only way to deal with this is to attack demand. If you buy ISK and are caught, first warning is stripping the account of all assets other than the character, i.e. you're left with a noob-ship witha civilian mining laser. Second offense, the account and everything in it (including the characters and all prepaid time) are removed and the no-refunds-for-expulsion clause invoked.
Zero tolerance for seller-cheaters, zero tolerance for buyer-cheaters. An approved in-game mechanism for extra ISK is available, and if you step out of that boundary, you're toast. People who are offended by this... tough. The rest of us don't want or need them to be here. Besides, what are they going to do about it? Appeal to a court and admit to breaking a EULA and enabling credit card fraud? Go to some other game? There's no other game like EVE out there to go to.
Play fair or get out.
And as for reporting statistics of disciplinary actions, I am all for that. I would also support identification by character name (or even account name) of terminated accounts. There is a precedent: your credit report. When you get a credit card, you explicitly agree to allow disclosure of violation of your agreement with them. This is no different: make it a condition of play that your account name and the cause of your expulsion may be disclosed. Don't like it? You don't get to play. Heck, I'd support that on an industry-wide basis. Create a real-identity database in which cheating and harassment that escalated to expulsion is reported, then other MMO providers could make an informed decision on whether they want to risk taking on a "nomad cheater". Same as a credit rating.
Hmmm. I wonder if there's a business opportunity in being the provider of such a system.
|

Anatal Klep
|
Posted - 2008.04.13 22:46:00 -
[193]
Quote: Besides, what are they going to do about it? Appeal to a court and admit to breaking a EULA and enabling credit card fraud? Go to some other game? There's no other game like EVE out there to go to.
Actually CCP could be taken to court. Banning ISK buyers is a blatant ploy to increase GTC revenues. As such it is a clear violation of US antitrust laws. CCP should talk to the officers of Neteller about whether having an offshore HQ is a safe haven. [Neteller's HQ is the Isle of Mann but they still ended up under arrest in NY. And Neteller has a lot more lawyers than CCP.]
Banning ISK buyers is CCP's prerogative. But if they do, then selling GTCs is illegal in the US.
|

Alani Martinius
|
Posted - 2008.04.13 23:26:00 -
[194]
Liebe Leute von CCP,
mit euerem Markt stimmt etwas nicht und deswegen besorgen sich die Spieler ISK aus dem Internet.
Nicht jeder kann oder will in einer Corporation mitmachen.
Ich bin ein reiner Wochenendspieler. Zu bestimmten Zeiten kann ich dies noch nicht mal. Weil ich als Computerspezialist _berstunden machen muss. Somit bin ich auf mich selbst angewiesen. Also hab ich keine gro¯e M÷glichkeiten bestimmte Skill die sehr teuer sind zu erwerben, weil wahnnwitzige Preise dafnr festgelegt werden(z.B. Advanced Spaceship Command Skill 45 Mill ISK.) Wie lange soll da jemand Erze sammeln ein, zwei, drei Jahre ?
Das Spiel ist konzepiert fnr Gruppen (Corporations)das weiss ich, aber wenn dann klein Gruppen (bis 10 Mitgliedern kaum eine Entwicklungschance haben um gro¯e Technologien zu erwerben ist das bedenkenswert.
Ich mache bei EVE mit um die verschiedenen Technologien die es gibt zu erlernen eine paar davon zu besitzen mehr nicht. Ich selbst halte mich aus allen Konflikte raus, und seh zu, das ich meinen Karakter weiterentwickle. Mittlerweile sto¯e ich an die Grenze meiner finanziellen M÷glichkeiten im EVE-Universum. Mein nSchstes Ziel war einen Carrier zu erwerben und die Skills zu erhalten. 450 Mill ISK fnr den Skill(in allen Regionen) ist kaum ein angebrachter Preis dafnr.
Auch wenn mann sich einen eigenen Spezialisten fnr Marktforschung/analyse beschafft hat, der sch÷ne Analysen macht, bringt es nichts fnr die kleinen Corporations.
Die CCP hat immer wieder sch÷ne Entwicklungen hervor gebracht. Aber wenn das Marktkonzept nicht nberarbeitet wird, sollte mann darnber nachdenken einen eigenen SHOP fnr ISK und alle anderen Sachen auf zu ziehen.
Wenn dann jemand wo anders ISK ect. kauft, dann kann man den mit den hSrtesten Strafen kommen und eventuell raus kicken.
Auch mich habt ihr schon mal erwischt - toll - - 450 Mill ISK.
Habe aber auch bei einem Test gemerkt, das bei euch in der Firma jemand sitzen muss der dabei mit macht. Ich habe mal eine GROSSE Summe gekauft. Dann hab ich mehr erhalten als bestellt. Schnell transferiert. Zwei Tage spSter meldet sich ein unbekannter, ich soll das zuviel bezahlte zurnck zahlen. Ich frage nach, um zuerfahren ob wirklich mein Vertragspartner dahinter steckt. Er halte nicht zufriedenstellende Antworten und zahle nicht. Am dritten Tag kann ich mich nicht mehr ordentlich einloggen, die Verbindung bricht regelmSssig nach 5 Minuten ab. Eine weiter Ermahnung erreicht mich. Erst nach dem ich alle zuviel gezahlten BetrSge zurnck-gezahlt habe kann ich frei spielen.
Das hat mir gezeigt, das hier mit zweierlei Mass gemessen wird. Ich habe den VerkSufer gewechselt und keine Probleme mehr gehabt.
Liebe CCP Leute setzt euch mal zusammen und nberlegt mal ganz grnndlich nach, ob ihr hier nicht nber das Ziel hinaus schie¯t. Bevor ihr ein neues Release raus lasst mit viel schnick schnack. Beispiel ist eventuell SecondLive als Shopprinzip - es sollten aber keine BetrSge auf die realen Konten der Spieler zurnckfliesen. Fnr Deutsche hat das steuerrechtlich konziquenzen.
Jetzt kommen wir zu einem heiklen juristischem Punkt.
Sind eure AGB nberhaupt gnltig fnr Deutschland
Das werde ich mit euch in einer anderen Rubrik diskutieren Die such ich morgen raus.
Tschnss.
(Solltet ihr jetzt meinen mich raus schmei¯en zu mnssen, wSre bewiesen das mit zweierlei Ma¯ gemessen wird und bei uns in Deutschland wSre die M÷glichkeit dagegen juristisch vorzugehen. )
|

TordenSkiold
|
Posted - 2008.04.13 23:53:00 -
[195]
Originally by: LTcyberT1000 Well, i think the main reason why EVE gets so lots of isk sellers/macro miners/etc is because of too much crowd in same EVE universe. Comparing with 3 years ago to ~5000 players and 3500 solar systems with ~35 000 players and same 3500 systems is a big difference. For normal player there is not enough space in these days. Try to look percentage not mined out belts with better ore than veldspar and scordite and i am sure it will be >90% of total belts wiped out right before downtime. Same is with 0.0 systems where people are "sitting" squized in crowds on top of each other.
CCP, player base expanded so much, and it is time to think about opening another EVE galaxy where ALL 40 000 players will fit like it was 3 years ago...
This.
CCP needs to wake up on this issue or it WILL slowly kill the game. It isn't that fun anymore when the systems just keep getting more crowdy and resources become less accessable for honest players. Having a sense of adventure and exploration once in a while never hurts the gaming experience either. Now a lot of players feel like loging on to play some sort of rush-hour/gredlock virtual experience. You wait, lag or que up for most things you want to do. Rid the game of macro'ers and farmers, yes it will help. But we also need more space . . . .
Torden'
|

Soulspatch
|
Posted - 2008.04.14 02:27:00 -
[196]
People sell ETC's because they want ISK. Others buy ETC's with ISK so they do not have to pay real money to play. The price of an ETC keep's falling which certainly is great for those wishing to purchase them using ISK. Unfortunitly if the price keeps dropping those who are after ISK will stop buying ETC's because it will not be worth the expense. CCP could sell ISK direct to the players and/or make ETC's non-transferable. Another option would be to fix the price of ETC's. In any instance there is demand for ISK and CCP are not meeting that demand, and they wonder why players then go to the ISK traders. |

GameNotzi
|
Posted - 2008.04.14 03:26:00 -
[197]
"If you need ISK, then please use the Secure ETC Trading System. This system is completely secure and risk free and the ISK you get this way is yours to keep, while we will mercilessly remove ISK bought for real money from ISK sellers, and we remove tens of billions of illegally purchased ISK every day."
This statement is false. The ETC trading system is not secure what so ever. CCP holds you liable for the actions of the people you trade the time too using their system. Without naming names person 'A' purchased a time card through this ETC system and Shateredcrystal. Person 'A' rcvd 360 mil isk and followed the rules exactly.Everything went perfectly-or so we thought. After completing the transaction person 'B' took his new timecard and sold it for real money to another player- person 'B' was caught red handed. Person 'B' got off with a warning and lost his timecard which didnt cost him anything but data on a stupid hardrive in Iceland. Person 'A' was punished more severely when ccp removed the isk from his account. Person 'A' is out real world money and has nothing to show for it. Who wins in the scenario? CCP. Person 'A' went through the proper channels and pleaded with CCP to be compensated somehow. Person 'A' also demanded person 'B' be banned for abusing the ETC system. Here is GM Krymus's response
"I wish we did not have to take these actions, but we prefer to remove the isk, rather than banning the account as we are aware that many simply do not read the rules" " It is absolutely certain that all donations from this character were being sold for real money. As such, we are forced to remove the ISK from those who received it, as this is a violation of the EVE Online EULA"
I dont have a problem with ccp removing the isk from the game. I do however, have a problem with CCP profiting from the sale of the timecard and not giving anything to anyone. Person A followed the rules and was punished more severely than person 'b', who was clearly the guilty party according to the GM. CCP should either provide a timecard,ISK in question, or at least a partial refund to Person 'A' money minus shatteredcrystal's cut. For those of you like me considering using the ETC system keep this in mind.You might get absolutely nothing for your money if someone you dont even know breaks the rules after the transaction. Whether we follow the rules or break them we are all at the mercy of CCP and the whims of the GMs. GameNotzi
|

Reptzo
Master Miners
|
Posted - 2008.04.14 04:39:00 -
[198]
Originally by: GameNotzi "If you need ISK, then please use the Secure ETC Trading System. This system is completely secure and risk free and the ISK you get this way is yours to keep, while we will mercilessly remove ISK bought for real money from ISK sellers, and we remove tens of billions of illegally purchased ISK every day."
This statement is false. The ETC trading system is not secure what so ever. CCP holds you liable for the actions of the people you trade the time too using their system. Without naming names person 'A' purchased a time card through this ETC system and Shateredcrystal. Person 'A' rcvd 360 mil isk and followed the rules exactly.Everything went perfectly-or so we thought. After completing the transaction person 'B' took his new timecard and sold it for real money to another player- person 'B' was caught red handed. Person 'B' got off with a warning and lost his timecard which didnt cost him anything but data on a stupid hardrive in Iceland. Person 'A' was punished more severely when ccp removed the isk from his account. Person 'A' is out real world money and has nothing to show for it. Who wins in the scenario? CCP. Person 'A' went through the proper channels and pleaded with CCP to be compensated somehow. Person 'A' also demanded person 'B' be banned for abusing the ETC system. Here is GM Krymus's response
"I wish we did not have to take these actions, but we prefer to remove the isk, rather than banning the account as we are aware that many simply do not read the rules" " It is absolutely certain that all donations from this character were being sold for real money. As such, we are forced to remove the ISK from those who received it, as this is a violation of the EVE Online EULA"
I dont have a problem with ccp removing the isk from the game. I do however, have a problem with CCP profiting from the sale of the timecard and not giving anything to anyone. Person A followed the rules and was punished more severely than person 'b', who was clearly the guilty party according to the GM. CCP should either provide a timecard,ISK in question, or at least a partial refund to Person 'A' money minus shatteredcrystal's cut. For those of you like me considering using the ETC system keep this in mind.You might get absolutely nothing for your money if someone you dont even know breaks the rules after the transaction. Whether we follow the rules or break them we are all at the mercy of CCP and the whims of the GMs. GameNotzi
This seems rather impossible. When you sell a GTC through the secure system, the person buying doesn't get the code. They get an offer on their account. So it is impossible to re-sell. It sounds like your friend was selling the code, but not through the secure system, which is recently against the EULA. Although, depending how long ago your friend sold the GTC, it may not have been against the rules at that time. Either way, not cool that he went legit and still got burned.
|

Kromaatikse Alain
Gallente Thiokol Spacefaring Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.04.14 06:16:00 -
[199]
I believe quite strongly that removing the supply is more effective than removing the demand, wherever this is possible. If the sellers have nothing to sell, they won't spam, they have no effect on the environment or market, and everyone is left in peace.
The economics of RMT are twofold: prices of commodities (such as minerals) go down, while prices of rare, performance-enhancing items (such as officer mods) go up. This is because the macros are selling commodities which they produce in bulk, and ISK buyers are using their newfound wealth on the best stuff they can find. These dynamics hurt both new and experienced players alike - because the profits of mining go down, and the best modules just get rarer.
I realise that more officer modules become available due to the mission-runner macros and farmers. However, because they are not the only sources of sold ISK - macro-miners are a large part of it - this effect does not balance out the scarcity caused by extra ISK being available to buyers.
IMO, the easiest way to spot a macro is to measure how long it spends online. A genuine human cannot physically spend more than about 16 hours a day online and active - at least, not sustainably. After about a week of 23/7 activity, he would keel over and die, like those Koreans we keep hearing about.
Therefore, if there is consistently more than 16 hours per day activity on a single account (and I mean actually pressing buttons here), then either the account is being shared (against the EULA, except for rare cases like capital ship pilots), or there is a macro running.
I'd like to ask the devs and GMs whether such time monitoring is presently performed - and if not, why not?
--- The key to knowledge is not to rely on others to teach it to you. |

Smilla Snow
|
Posted - 2008.04.14 08:19:00 -
[200]
Originally by: Alani Martinius
Auch mich habt ihr schon mal erwischt - toll - - 450 Mill ISK.
Hoffentlich erwischen Sie dich wieder!
Es ist schade, nur weil du nicht so ganz kapiert hast wie das Spiel funktioniert, das Du ISK fnr Cash einkaufst. Viele Wochenendspieler mnssen das nicht, die benutzen ihre KreativitSt und das Spiel um an ISK zu kommen - und es gibt so viele Wege.
Dein Post war jetzt einfach nur ein Armutszeugnis, und sry das ich jetzt so direkt bin, aber das muss dir mal jemand sagen.
Short english text...
I hope CCP will catch you again when you buying ISK. Your Reasons, like weekendplayer, is a just whining. You have a lot of possabilities to get ISK, just no "Instant Soup" one. Your reasons are just a poverty testimony of yourself and sry to be that direct, but i think somebody should tell you that.
|

Commander Izton
|
Posted - 2008.04.14 12:09:00 -
[201]
"If you need ISK, then please use the Secure ETC Trading System. This system is completely secure and risk free and the ISK you get this way is yours to keep, while we will mercilessly remove ISK bought for real money from ISK sellers, and we remove tens of billions of illegally purchased ISK every day."
This statement is false. The ETC trading system is not secure what so ever. CCP holds you liable for the actions of the people you trade the time too using their system. Without naming names person 'A' purchased a time card through this ETC system and Shateredcrystal. Person 'A' rcvd 360 mil isk and followed the rules exactly.Everything went perfectly-or so we thought. After completing the transaction person 'B' took his new timecard and sold it for real money to another player- person 'B' was caught red handed. Person 'B' got off with a warning and lost his timecard which didnt cost him anything but data on a stupid hardrive in Iceland. Person 'A' was punished more severely when ccp removed the isk from his account. Person 'A' is out real world money and has nothing to show for it. Who wins in the scenario? CCP. Person 'A' went through the proper channels and pleaded with CCP to be compensated somehow. Person 'A' also demanded person 'B' be banned for abusing the ETC system. Here is GM Krymus's response
"I wish we did not have to take these actions, but we prefer to remove the isk, rather than banning the account as we are aware that many simply do not read the rules" " It is absolutely certain that all donations from this character were being sold for real money. As such, we are forced to remove the ISK from those who received it, as this is a violation of the EVE Online EULA"
I dont have a problem with ccp removing the isk from the game. I do however, have a problem with CCP profiting from the sale of the timecard and not giving anything to anyone. Person A followed the rules and was punished more severely than person 'b', who was clearly the guilty party according to the GM. CCP should either provide a timecard,ISK in question, or at least a partial refund to Person 'A' money minus shatteredcrystal's cut. For those of you like me considering using the ETC system keep this in mind.You might get absolutely nothing for your money if someone you dont even know breaks the rules after the transaction. Whether we follow the rules or break them we are all at the mercy of CCP and the whims of the GMs. GameNotzi
This seems rather impossible. When you sell a GTC through the secure system, the person buying doesn't get the code. They get an offer on their account. So it is impossible to re-sell. It sounds like your friend was selling the code, but not through the secure system, which is recently against the EULA. Although, depending how long ago your friend sold the GTC, it may not have been against the rules at that time. Either way, not cool that he went legit and still got burned. IF you READ and comprehend a little more carefully, especially the GM's quotes you will see it happened exactly how I stated- and it happened a couple of weeks ago. Thats not in question... I challenge any moderator or gm to dispute my facts I stated. I dont not know exactly how Person 'b' was caught since i dont know him nor do i care. I am deeply concerned with CCP saying something is "risk free" when in fact its not
|

Garet Jaxis
|
Posted - 2008.04.14 12:27:00 -
[202]
Originally by: Chainsaw Plankton I am hoping that with subscription 2.0 the RMT trade will diminish even further
Get a clue. Subscriptions 2.0 was an April fools joke toward Microsoft. Read the dev posting and comments. It was posted on April 1st. It was an APRIL FOOLS JOKE.
|

Sir Substance
|
Posted - 2008.04.14 14:20:00 -
[203]
Originally by: Pooka Edited by: Pooka on 12/04/2008 17:46:10
 HEY!! 7 pages and no one has asked a question about this: "Corporations, or even Alliances, should not be able to fuel their wars and other activities like they have done in a number of cases with ISK bought for real world money." WHO? Which Corporations and did you ban them or not!! I can guess which ones you are talking about.
CCP comment please.
i dont think CCP needs to name names. any corp or alliance doing this would have been shafted by CCP. look for an alliance that suddenly died with no warning.
meanwhile, i was glad to see that people who buy ISK and spend it get negative wallet. it warms my heart to see your not going to give any ground on the situation of RTM. all is as it should be in that respect.
|

Aktivistka
|
Posted - 2008.04.14 19:14:00 -
[204]
1. I think that the players must report bot-macro using miners. U can easily find them in ice belts. How can U see that this is a bot?
-They mostly never use transport ships to transport ice to base. As soon as their cargo hold is full, the macro automaticly make them jump to station. Then they go to the same place and do the same sequence all over again untill they empty whole ice field. This is really annoying, I tell ya. -Also there are several (5+) mining bots in one place. -They are mostly members of noob corps
2. The second problem is real money pilot selling. Some people established this business and make a good money from that. For example a pilot that has about 30mln skill points cost up to 800 US dollars
3. Though the money transfers are seen by admins, ISK sellers use orders at station or contracts to "legally" transfer the money The buyer of isks for example put the ship for specified sum of money, the isk seller buys it and gives back the item through trade at station... from time to time I see t1 invulnerability field in contracts or orders for more than 1 billion.)) U got my idea, I hope
|

Corlinas
|
Posted - 2008.04.14 20:42:00 -
[205]
I ask a simple question, what is the difference in RMT for ISK and selling game time cards? The more I think about it, all I see is there really is only the difference of one extra step and paperwork. Why not License the selling? I haven't myself bought any ISK and don't intend to as a personal choice but I don't particularly see a reason why not other than game legality.
1. Second Life, a very large MMORPG, does it regularly and people still enjoy their time on the game.
2. The people that buy ISK either a. don't play very often and everyone they play with that does is able to afford much nicer ships and implants and various other niceties that sets them way behing the power curve, or b. will not necessarily have the experience that grinding missions and pvp for cash gives you so they will have really nice toys, but can't use them for crap. (Ever seen a one month old character buy a Navy Issue Raven and subsequently go to a 0.4 sec space unprotected? I have, it is absolutely hillarious when they cry and whine about losing it to some punk in a destroyer with a tenth the price of gear.)
3. ISK farmers are everywhere in MMORPGs, ever since Everquest really hit it big. As soon as you switched on the first servers for beta testers, I will bet you a year of my real life pay that you had at least ten percent of the supposed testers were actually game money farmers, ramping up. As long as they see a way of making money you can't stop them. United States of America's war on drugs for the past fifty years should help anyone see that. Drugs still plague a lot of countries no matter what steps they take.
4. Regulating can actually improve your profit margins. Think about Licensing Game money sales websites and them giving you a cut of what they make, then you could put that in your pocket and improve your security systems for hackers. How much training does it really take till you are making enough money to regularly sell it anyway? I would think at least six months with multiple accounts and tons of hours online for a decent sized group of people. No matter how much time you spend on it, it takes at least that long to train up to where a pilot has a good ship with a great outfit and can use it well enough for money making mining operations and/or mission running and complex farming. Corporations out there don't even sell ISK but still complex farm. Everyone knows who I am talking about.
5. Really want to fix macro mining? Try using signals that don't register to Macro programs if you want to verify a person is actually online. Like the entire game screen getting a red haze over it. No other affect but what a player would see instead of a program, then if no response, log them off, or blow up their ship. They'll stop if you keep blowing their ships up when they go permanent AFK while their character is actually active mining or mission running without them. And if an immediate response is received from the player going to a gm and talking to them, saying they were there, give them a new ship with the same outfit and cargo. No harm no foul, just a little lost time.
I feel a lot of this is solvable with legalizing and regulating. I noticed when I did research on this game that most of the farming sights charge for ISK, just a few ISK cheaper then what you sell GTCs for. You already control what a single ISK is worth when you set the price of your Game time cards and players barter deals for them, why not just take it the one logical step forward by legalizing, regulating, and ensuring that it is the GTC that is cheaper and therefore shift market focus toward it instead so your goal of making people spend more time on game is achieved and you attract more new players to your game with the facet. I might be simplifying the economics a bit but please look at this from another angle instead of believing a large number of player problems and hacking would result from selling straight ISK for money.
|

marmitta
|
Posted - 2008.04.15 05:59:00 -
[206]
Edited by: marmitta on 15/04/2008 06:04:20
Originally by: Anatal Klep The blurb on RMT is one of the more disingenuous things I've read lately.
Problem 1: RMT fosters crime outside EVE. OK, but that is none of CCP's business. CCP is a game vendor, not Interpol. In addition, ISK buyers are not the bad guys and don't even know which sellers are bad guys. Caveat emptor.
Problem 2: RMT harms everyone because it messes up the EVE economy. CCP must have slept through Economics 101. This argument is rubbish because the inflation already exists due to cash cows in the game. To increase inflation the ISK must be spent and it doesn't matter if it is spent by the original ISK farmer or someone else making an RMT transfer payment. cash cow = inflation and RMT has nothing to do with that.
Problem 3: RMT encourages macro-play for ISK farming. True. But CCP could stop macro-play any time it wants with a few heuristics on player activities. The interesting question is: why doesn't CCP do that? CCP doesn't because...
Problem 4: ETC is Good -- for CCP! That's because CCP gets extra revenue from players who could not otherwise afford multiple accounts. So the ISK farming is allowed to ensure ETC purchases to finance those accounts through transfer payments from players who do have plenty of RM and want to buy their way into positions. But CCP doesn't get any revenue if those transfer payments are outside the game, so CCP tries to force all such RMT to be through ETCs by making ISK purchasers the bad guys.
[For the record: I don't buy ISK because I already make 9 figures a week trading and manufacturing -- without macros.]
hit the nail on the head with that post.. i prefer reading posts where the peeps tell it like it is.. not the smuzzeez trying to get a GM job.. 9 figures a week wow good for you ... most miners are lucky making 50M a day.. that is if they dont loose 200 Million worth of ships to the ccp sanctioned goon swarm bombers .. could you imagine the CCP bottom line with no chinease macro miner accounts active.. can you say bankruptcy and not in ISK either.. the whole shamile is a scam they allow chinease macroers, they allow the goons to thrash miners all to fill there bottom line pure and simple ( thats also why there is no way to contact and real company employees.. no 800 number, just a canned message from a player who smuzzied his way into a GM position no customer service at all)
|

Lioun Warga
|
Posted - 2008.04.15 11:54:00 -
[207]
Postet this a few days ago...
Comments are welcome..
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=747465
|

johangent
|
Posted - 2008.04.15 15:42:00 -
[208]
gtc for isk is needed , becouse the 2004 players can kill for fun even in emp chars and stop there game . its easy for a 2004 the game started in 2003 , emp was safe . 2003 players in 0.0 for example 5 ravens with torps on a gate in emp , full damage , everything is death , and the insurantie pays even the ship back :-) 2004 somethimes thinking its not only the skils , and indeed , but for this it is . in july starts a boycot for that . a lot industrial chars and others are already in . this summer all new players never survive to let ccp change things . a 2004 can kill us , we kan kill all the new chars . and even olsow get the isk back from insurantie rules are rules , and for breaking a rule there must be a punishement , for example , kill a industrial in a 0.5 and higher , lost torps 5 skil
im sure these killer protest for that , the protesting chars are then the killers , and are to scared to fight in 0.0
|

Lab Technician071548
Astro-Support Services East India Company
|
Posted - 2008.04.15 15:58:00 -
[209]
In an effort to assist CCP in finding ISK sellers and macro players, I offer the following tip in the form of a question (Jeopardy, anyone?): "How many people with legitimate game play in mind name their characters 'klajsdhgft?'"
Or, put another way in the form of a statement: "There exist heurisms for identifying unlikely letter combinations and characters with, say, 2 or more unlikely combinations or all numbers in their name should be targetted for EULA violation auditing." ----
Do you need special permission to type in this color? |

Ki Anna
Ki Tech Industries
|
Posted - 2008.04.15 18:08:00 -
[210]
Originally by: Lab Technician071548 In an effort to assist CCP in finding ISK sellers and macro players, I offer the following tip in the form of a question (Jeopardy, anyone?): "How many people with legitimate game play in mind name their characters 'klajsdhgft?'"
Or, put another way in the form of a statement: "There exist heurisms for identifying unlikely letter combinations and characters with, say, 2 or more unlikely combinations or all numbers in their name should be targetted for EULA violation auditing."
As soon as CCP implements such a policy the only people who would have characters named like that would be legitmate players.
Those who repeatedly violate the EULA/ToS to engage in RMT will quickly learn that they need to use names that pass the heuristic check.
Those legitmate players who create a scout or other toss-away character using a name that does not pass the heuristic check will be the only ones who are picked up by the check.
It is fair better to apply heuristics to play style than to character names, and I am sure that CCP is already well on their way with regards to such things.
Of course they cannot tell us anything about their heuristics without giving away information that would void their effectiveness.
|

marmitta
|
Posted - 2008.04.15 19:31:00 -
[211]
allowing goons to pop people trying to make a meger living mining is BAD! The chinease macros will never be stopped, imagine if all those (jlkgerty) accounts were banned the number of players in eve would be cut in half aswell as CCP's bottom line in monthly income.. also the chinease macros are the only ones that pay a decent price for the GTC's so they can keep all there accounts named jlkgerty running. CCP needs to stop all the macros and the goons so peeps can carve out a living mining. making 50M a day mining then at the end of the day loosing your 200M mining ship.. its impossible for a new player to survive in this game with the current crap going on..
|

Molpadia Devaux
Minmatar Science Technoligies
|
Posted - 2008.04.15 22:27:00 -
[212]
Originally by: marmitta allowing goons to pop people trying to make a meger living mining is BAD! The chinease macros will never be stopped, imagine if all those (jlkgerty) accounts were banned the number of players in eve would be cut in half aswell as CCP's bottom line in monthly income.. also the chinease macros are the only ones that pay a decent price for the GTC's so they can keep all there accounts named jlkgerty running. CCP needs to stop all the macros and the goons so peeps can carve out a living mining. making 50M a day mining then at the end of the day loosing your 200M mining ship.. its impossible for a new player to survive in this game with the current crap going on..
I've been playing MMO's since Dec '99. My experience with PvP servers was that they were dedicated to gankers, and that playstyle. I never had one person of the same level as me (or within 1 level) attack me. It was always someone many levels above me. The population seemed made up of flywing pullers and puppy kickers, not anyone interested in anykind of a challenge in PvP. The alternatives were get hooked up with a guild that could twink you, or RMT. I oppose RMT, so I played PVE. and had fun in many games, the RMT question never crossed my mind.
Then I decided to give EVE a try, wasn't sure I would like a space based game. (Star Wars NGE victim) Let me tell you of my first weeks experience.
For 30 days you join the rookie help channel. Unless an ISD is on you get spam, spam, spam every 15 min selling ISK. Block this guy, block that guy, if you ask a question you can't see an answer as the spam scrolls it off faster than you can scroll up.
CCP is not helping the real newb by allowing this to go on, and at some point you get the idea that this may be endorsed. Now go out mining in you newb ship. In 1.0 sec, newb starting area you pass several wrecks of newb ships. Get to the asteroid belt mine and return, refine you ore and sell it for a whopping 10K ISK. Repeat and train skills to save enough to get a frigate capable of lvl 1 missions. Do 3 or 4 missions get 20K-40K per mission.
Check the boards learn about can baiting (hidden chest), can flipping, suicide gankers.
Check market for better ship and skills, go to EveMon and set a plan to train for a good ship, see that that will cost you 300M isk, without the ship.
Compare that with the 40K your getting per mission.( you don't know yet about salvaging, every time you ask the question in rookie help any answer is scrolled off by spamers, and you don't know that in a week you will be making 500k to 1M for a mission.
You haven't seen or heard about anything being done to suicide gankers or can baiters and you figure it can take you 3 or 4 years to get a destroyer. Buying ISK begins to look like the only alernative. Nowhere have you heard about GTC. If you make the mistake, CCP will come down on you like a ton of bricks.
After 30 days, I know that I can make enough and have no need to buy ISK. Seeing new players ganked and no knowledge that you will make more than 30K per mission makes ISK buying look good.
The policies as currently enforced could drive new players away. I'm all for coming down hard on accounts more than 30 or 60 days old, people who should by now know how to make money. I would suggest a different form of punishment for new accounts. If you screw up and buy ISK the first week you are playing, because you think that is the only way people afford those 4.5M skill books, and you log in to find yourself Millions in debt, and no way to work it off. You are left either deleting the character, or canceling the subscription. Is CCP so flush with money from subscriptions that they can afford to drive the uninformed away?
I almost got caught in this trap, but worked it out because I had just started a second account. If not for that I would have quit. I've been against RMT for years, something is needed from CCP to educate the total newb better.
|

Pang Grohl
Gallente Sudo Corp
|
Posted - 2008.04.16 21:04:00 -
[213]
Originally by: Anatal Klep
Quote: Besides, what are they going to do about it? Appeal to a court and admit to breaking a EULA and enabling credit card fraud? Go to some other game? There's no other game like EVE out there to go to.
Actually CCP could be taken to court. Banning ISK buyers is a blatant ploy to increase GTC revenues. As such it is a clear violation of US antitrust laws. CCP should talk to the officers of Neteller about whether having an offshore HQ is a safe haven. [Neteller's HQ is the Isle of Mann but they still ended up under arrest in NY. And Neteller has a lot more lawyers than CCP.]
Banning ISK buyers is CCP's prerogative. But if they do, then selling GTCs is illegal in the US.
Ermmm... BS. EVE, ISK, and all game materials are CCP's intellectual property. CCP holds exclusive rights to regulate everyone's use of these materials. CCP can take any legal measure to prevent other parties from profiting from their property. CCP can also make whatever agreements they like to license the use of their property in both commercial and non-commercial ways.
Time Codes are simply a way to sell subscription time.
CCP has chosen to allow subscribers to trade Time Codes for ISK, as a way to combat third parties using CCP's intellectual property for profit without appropriate license from CCP. CCP chose to create a method of trading ISK for Time Codes that eliminates scams when used, for the benefit of their customers.
When it comes to RMT, CCP can ignore it, or work to stop it. If CCP did nothing you would complain about spammers, farmers, and a runaway economic implosion.
P.S. Neteller was violating US laws, and their corporate officers were arrested in US territory. |

Hokage Jiraiya
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.04.17 12:06:00 -
[214]
Edited by: Hokage Jiraiya on 17/04/2008 12:13:28 .....
|

Oghma Grianainech
Minmatar Spectral Wolves HUZZAH FEDERATION
|
Posted - 2008.04.17 12:13:00 -
[215]
Edited by: Oghma Grianainech on 17/04/2008 12:14:39
Originally by: Eleana Tomelac
Originally by: Kuolematon
Originally by: GM Grimmi Macro-mission runners is exactly what I mean. Sorry for the mix-up :)
Intresting. You can run missions with macros? Hmm..
Just sit in evati or auner for like 1hour... makes you wonder what 50 to 100 t1 haulers with 3x cargoexpanders IIs jumping in and out nonstop with random dictionary names ...... but they don't exist ... according to CCP or so it would seem since nothing has been done for about a year.
|

Hokage Jiraiya
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.04.17 12:34:00 -
[216]
Edited by: Hokage Jiraiya on 17/04/2008 12:36:57
Originally by: Thathys Jeesus am i tired of this discussion... Arrgh!!
Stop all Isk trading!! Or allow 1x30 day ETC for 30 days!
Some say it's good to be able to pay for game time with Isk,sure it's great. So limit it to game time and not Isk stacking!!
If all players bought their game time with Isk,what would CCP earn then!!??
0:-
Or am i wrong?
ONLY WAY TO MAKE THE ISK PROBLEM GO AWAY,IS TO HAVE 100% HAPPY CUSTOMERS!! Thats what we are,so put some effort into customer service and people will be loyal.
or maby i'm wrong.....
Actually that is the only problem with CCP, they want to do things their own way and keep forgetting that life is about PR and politics. Anyone can get away with anything if they smile and pretend to treat people decently, instead CCP has the PR knowleadge and knowhow of a 2year kid that screams MY CANDY MY CANDY MYCANDY !
Remember the game and the company may be CCP and it may just be their right to do whatever they wish with their product, however it is a product that needs to be sold and accepted by the public.
NO PR NO sales.
Bottomline is yes there may be a huge increase in "subscriptions" in the last 2years but how many of those are actually paying customers and not ISK for GTC buyers and how many are not employee accounts. ( AFAIK GM/DEV/employees have 4 or 5 free accounts ) so all in all it adds up. Google ftw.
In stead of giving every employee in China some fancy toys for Xmas or New year whatever it was, maybe employing a professional PR manager/director/grunt would have been better waste of monies. Google ftw.
In the end, the problem is CCP tries to push around what they want into the consumers throat without using any sugar :( ..... remember Mary Poppins ! A little bit of Sugar makes the medicine go down !
All in all it is a great game.... just needs some proper sweet loving brainwashing not so truthful truths told by a full time politburo scumbag men in black suit and sunglasses.
PS. Everytime I write a post like this, I keep expecting that I will not be able to login. I love the game so don't ban me for speaking my mind ! pretty please. Anyway I bet maybe 3% of the community ever reads the forums.
|

Hokage Jiraiya
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.04.17 12:52:00 -
[217]
Originally by: Pang Grohl
Originally by: Anatal Klep
Quote: Besides, what are they going to do about it? Appeal to a court and admit to breaking a EULA and enabling credit card fraud? Go to some other game? There's no other game like EVE out there to go to.
Actually CCP could be taken to court. Banning ISK buyers is a blatant ploy to increase GTC revenues. As such it is a clear violation of US antitrust laws. CCP should talk to the officers of Neteller about whether having an offshore HQ is a safe haven. [Neteller's HQ is the Isle of Mann but they still ended up under arrest in NY. And Neteller has a lot more lawyers than CCP.]
Banning ISK buyers is CCP's prerogative. But if they do, then selling GTCs is illegal in the US.
Ermmm... BS. EVE, ISK, and all game materials are CCP's intellectual property. CCP holds exclusive rights to regulate everyone's use of these materials. CCP can take any legal measure to prevent other parties from profiting from their property. CCP can also make whatever agreements they like to license the use of their property in both commercial and non-commercial ways.
Time Codes are simply a way to sell subscription time.
CCP has chosen to allow subscribers to trade Time Codes for ISK, as a way to combat third parties using CCP's intellectual property for profit without appropriate license from CCP. CCP chose to create a method of trading ISK for Time Codes that eliminates scams when used, for the benefit of their customers.
When it comes to RMT, CCP can ignore it, or work to stop it. If CCP did nothing you would complain about spammers, farmers, and a runaway economic implosion.
P.S. Neteller was violating US laws, and their corporate officers were arrested in US territory.
Note: Yes they could be brought to court regardless if it is their product, cause the matter in question here is increasing sells through manipulation of the market therefore there is a valid case which falls under antitrust laws in US. :( But that would wreck EVE and CCP and leave us with nothing @!!!!
|

rock ratt
|
Posted - 2008.04.18 00:50:00 -
[218]
the only bad thing is when a gm removes isk without explaining as to why and when i petition, they will not say and then a senior gm ( nova) gets it, he insists that the first GM GAVE me isk, so he takes it too, then when i sell everything except the basics to cover all this, and transfer it from one account i own to the effected on, the same gm removes it saying it was from a criminal, even though it was taged. now this same gm is still insisting i explain why i got isk from a gm who i sent id and name of gm, stating it was removed not given, has been rude and demanding i explain this and " don't try to give excuses, i want an explaination" . i even called Iceland to be told to take it to a gm in game. they refer to some log that i dont have, and saying an alt has gotten isk from a know criminal but will not say what alt as i have 3 accounts and all slots full. So tellme this is being handeled correctly, i agree isk sellers are bad, but because i sell my frieghter and BS to give my oldest char the isk to get into green agian, then they remove it too? where does it end? when no one can sell or trade in fear of the gm's taking it away?
|

Thorbjorn Brundtland
PezCo - Ice Services Brutally Clever Empire
|
Posted - 2008.04.18 07:51:00 -
[219]
I¦ve heard that using the contract system instead of direct trades can solve alot of problem in this manner cause they¦re more traceable compared to the direct trades.
Furthermore I try to avoid trading with 1 day old noob-alts. I also made that in my early days to safe my mains identity but who cares  
I¦m not pirating and so I don¦t have to worry about my reputation  |

Kastari
|
Posted - 2008.04.18 12:31:00 -
[220]
Also, regarding the thing about people stealing your credit card info. If you buy through paypal, that statement is pure nonsense.
CCP etc trading system is merely a way for ccp to monopolize rmt trading for their ISK which is ONLY generated inside the server. It isn't brought into the game. It's already there.
|

Anatal Klep
|
Posted - 2008.04.18 15:06:00 -
[221]
Originally by: Hokage Jiraiya
Originally by: Anatal Klep
Actually CCP could be taken to court. Banning ISK buyers is a blatant ploy to increase GTC revenues. As such it is a clear violation of US antitrust laws. CCP should talk to the officers of Neteller about whether having an offshore HQ is a safe haven. [Neteller's HQ is the Isle of Mann but they still ended up under arrest in NY. And Neteller has a lot more lawyers than CCP.
Banning ISK buyers is CCP's prerogative. But if they do, then selling GTCs is illegal in the US.
Ermmm... BS. EVE, ISK, and all game materials are CCP's intellectual property. CCP holds exclusive rights to regulate everyone's use of these materials. CCP can take any legal measure to prevent other parties from profiting from their property. CCP can also make whatever agreements they like to license the use of their property in both commercial and non-commercial ways.
Intellectual property has nothing to do with it. CCP is limiting competition for RMT sales by placing strictures on the existing player base to protect their GTC revenues. In terms of US law that is a combination in restraint of trade because it is artificially preventing participation in the RMT market by competitors to CCP.
One would be hard put to find a clearer case of violation of the US anti-trust laws.
|

Anatal Klep
|
Posted - 2008.04.18 15:21:00 -
[222]
Originally by: Lab Technician071548 In an effort to assist CCP in finding ISK sellers and macro players, I offer the following tip in the form of a question (Jeopardy, anyone?): "How many people with legitimate game play in mind name their characters 'klajsdhgft?'"
Or, put another way in the form of a statement: "There exist heurisms for identifying unlikely letter combinations and characters with, say, 2 or more unlikely combinations or all numbers in their name should be targetted for EULA violation auditing."
Unfortunately that is not sufficient. It would be fairly easy to automatically generate "realistic" names from SciFi, mythology, or whatever.
However, when used in conjunction with heuristics on key words in the message body, frequency of posting, etc. it would be a very effective means for reducing spamming. I am puzzled why CCP has not done this already since everyone who can spell 'google' can find ISK sellers anyway and it clearly affects EVE playability.
Similar heuristics could be applied to cash cows like macromining. It would require more complicated analysis over a period of time to identify specific cash cow abuse, but it is still not a big deal. Unlike spammers, such accounts need substantial SP investment, so such heuristics would be very effective because of the loss to the account holder even if they take more time.
Bottom line: CCP could curtail both RMT spamming and cash cows a lot more effectively than by trying to convince players not to buy ISK with specious arguments.
|

Tieto
Caldari SweetPro
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 11:45:00 -
[223]
Edited by: Tieto on 19/04/2008 11:52:59 Do what LOTRO did. Ban all China IPs..... :P
|

UnexpectedGreg
|
Posted - 2008.04.20 11:37:00 -
[224]
I know...why not intruduce a password box just as you enter a mission area, for example.... You get to the jump gate of a mission then once you click on jump...a box appears asking you to type out the following password. Doesn't have to be a long password just somthing to force the player to actually be there. You can take the same idea on complexes. Meh...It's just a thought. This might prevent macro farming for ISK on many levels?
Thanks,
UnexpectedGreg
|

Qubit Infinity
|
Posted - 2008.04.23 06:11:00 -
[225]
A NEW WAY OF MINING
So far as I can tell the most common method of generationg the ISK to sell for real money is macro mining.
CCP instead of being reactive and trying to catch people doing real money trading why not be proactive?
Many of the rmt are criminals and CCP is always going to be one step behind in stopping them.
My idea would be to fix mining. What I mean is: mining is so spectacularly boring and mechanically repetitive that it is an ideal target for macros.
If mining was made into the game that it should be, requiring real time input from the player much like missions do, it would be much more difficult to macro mine and vastly less profitable. It would also mean that more players would be drawn to mining as an exciting career.
I beleive that macro mining is so entrenched in the eve economy, that wiping it out entirely would present serious problems for the eve economy.
However an new way of mining could be statistical in nature, so that unintelligent macros get a lower yield than, skilled players. This skewing could be introduced slowly, so that the economy could adapt of a period of time.
In short make mining fun and dificult to macro, and most of the rmt would go away in time.
|

Vincent Santoro
|
Posted - 2008.04.25 13:03:00 -
[226]
Originally by: Qubit Infinity A NEW WAY OF MINING
So far as I can tell the most common method of generationg the ISK to sell for real money is macro mining.
CCP instead of being reactive and trying to catch people doing real money trading why not be proactive?
Many of the rmt are criminals and CCP is always going to be one step behind in stopping them.
My idea would be to fix mining. What I mean is: mining is so spectacularly boring and mechanically repetitive that it is an ideal target for macros.
If mining was made into the game that it should be, requiring real time input from the player much like missions do, it would be much more difficult to macro mine and vastly less profitable. It would also mean that more players would be drawn to mining as an exciting career.
I beleive that macro mining is so entrenched in the eve economy, that wiping it out entirely would present serious problems for the eve economy.
However an new way of mining could be statistical in nature, so that unintelligent macros get a lower yield than, skilled players. This skewing could be introduced slowly, so that the economy could adapt of a period of time.
In short make mining fun and dificult to macro, and most of the rmt would go away in time.
Sounds like a good idea to me.
|

Sunbird Huy
Ardent Industrial Hydra Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.04.26 02:59:00 -
[227]
Originally by: Anatal Klep
Originally by: Hokage Jiraiya
Originally by: Anatal Klep
Actually CCP could be taken to court. Banning ISK buyers is a blatant ploy to increase GTC revenues. As such it is a clear violation of US antitrust laws. CCP should talk to the officers of Neteller about whether having an offshore HQ is a safe haven. [Neteller's HQ is the Isle of Mann but they still ended up under arrest in NY. And Neteller has a lot more lawyers than CCP.
Banning ISK buyers is CCP's prerogative. But if they do, then selling GTCs is illegal in the US.
Ermmm... BS. EVE, ISK, and all game materials are CCP's intellectual property. CCP holds exclusive rights to regulate everyone's use of these materials. CCP can take any legal measure to prevent other parties from profiting from their property. CCP can also make whatever agreements they like to license the use of their property in both commercial and non-commercial ways.
Intellectual property has nothing to do with it. CCP is limiting competition for RMT sales by placing strictures on the existing player base to protect their GTC revenues. In terms of US law that is a combination in restraint of trade because it is artificially preventing participation in the RMT market by competitors to CCP.
One would be hard put to find a clearer case of violation of the US anti-trust laws.
HAHAH GO MAN KICK 'EM WHERE IT HURTS... It does suck that people go on e-bay and get ISK, without earning it ingame, but it can be that people just like the pvp side of EVE, and possibly don;t have time to actually make some ISK to enjoy the full PvP they got the skills for. TBH, I don't support the ISK buyers, but it's their thing, I know I won't be doing that, I make just enough to have some fun pew-pew from time to time...for me eve is all about hanging out with people u get to know and start to see as friends, not as a job(liek macro runners)...u should really be stopping those, as they are the ones most likely doing the trading anyway... BTW, is CCP actually supposed to comply with U.S. laws? It is a Icelandic company, right?
|

Sunbird Huy
Ardent Industrial Hydra Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.04.26 03:01:00 -
[228]
Originally by: Vincent Santoro
Originally by: Qubit Infinity A NEW WAY OF MINING
So far as I can tell the most common method of generationg the ISK to sell for real money is macro mining.
CCP instead of being reactive and trying to catch people doing real money trading why not be proactive?
Many of the rmt are criminals and CCP is always going to be one step behind in stopping them.
My idea would be to fix mining. What I mean is: mining is so spectacularly boring and mechanically repetitive that it is an ideal target for macros.
If mining was made into the game that it should be, requiring real time input from the player much like missions do, it would be much more difficult to macro mine and vastly less profitable. It would also mean that more players would be drawn to mining as an exciting career.
I beleive that macro mining is so entrenched in the eve economy, that wiping it out entirely would present serious problems for the eve economy.
However an new way of mining could be statistical in nature, so that unintelligent macros get a lower yield than, skilled players. This skewing could be introduced slowly, so that the economy could adapt of a period of time.
In short make mining fun and dificult to macro, and most of the rmt would go away in time.
Sounds like a good idea to me.
AMEN
|

Cigano
|
Posted - 2008.04.26 10:48:00 -
[229]
Edited by: Cigano on 26/04/2008 10:50:23 I think that all this question is about playing time, the game is very time consuming to get isk for the average and new players, if you lose CNR T2 fitted or a freighter full of cargo it will set you back big time, and CCP should make a way to revise this. An idea was to bill the accounts for the time played in addition to a max time for day to play (let say 12H) if one play more he must pay for it, just like a phone bill. That will give something for macro farmers to think about, they will need to pay more to be online or they don't have so much time to strip out belts. And how about purchasing items out of game for RM is that considered isk buying to?...
|

Chigun
|
Posted - 2008.04.29 10:02:00 -
[230]
Sounds like the major problem with RMT is that you might get your credit card number and login info stolen. Why doesn't any MMO provider solve the problem of illegal RMTs by having their own RMT system. If CCP sold ISK and items they could set the price, protect the users from theft, make some extra money to throw at the lag problem, and partially control the market. |

Exa Istari
|
Posted - 2008.04.29 16:20:00 -
[231]
I would like to propose a different solution to empire macro mining...
Make mining in 0.0 MORE profitable. I did a recent survey of some regions in 0.0 and most of the systems only have ORE that can be mined in empire. Most of the rare systems that have the 0.0 high ends are tightly controlled by large alliance that don't like little corps playing in their sandbox.
Think of the implication to this... if 1/4 of the 0.0 systems in Eve had Mercoxit and nearly all of them had Dark Ochre or Gneiss, macro mining would become less profitable and all the things that are good about eve would be enhanced. More people would come to 0.0, pirates would have more targets, corp and smaller alliance would be able to make a profit from doing work in 1 or 2 systems...
My 2 isk.
|

Gromash
|
Posted - 2008.04.29 23:38:00 -
[232]
I would like to say that i do not at all support illegal activity, macro-mining, macro-mission running nor have I sold isk for real world money but I do believe that honest players should be able to sell isk for money rather then solely handing money over to EVE dev through GTC's. It's just like the EVE dev team to clump macro-miners, macro-mission runners, and criminals together as the sole type of people who would want to sell isk for real money.
The dev team doesn't mind that people get ahead by using real money but they do mind when it is not through GTC's that cost a little more and add to their profits.
In sort the dev team is greedy and propaganda doesn't work on me for one.
|

Gromash
|
Posted - 2008.04.29 23:49:00 -
[233]
Originally by: Qubit Infinity A NEW WAY OF MINING
So far as I can tell the most common method of generationg the ISK to sell for real money is macro mining.
CCP instead of being reactive and trying to catch people doing real money trading why not be proactive?
Many of the rmt are criminals and CCP is always going to be one step behind in stopping them.
My idea would be to fix mining. What I mean is: mining is so spectacularly boring and mechanically repetitive that it is an ideal target for macros.
If mining was made into the game that it should be, requiring real time input from the player much like missions do, it would be much more difficult to macro mine and vastly less profitable. It would also mean that more players would be drawn to mining as an exciting career.
I beleive that macro mining is so entrenched in the eve economy, that wiping it out entirely would present serious problems for the eve economy.
However an new way of mining could be statistical in nature, so that unintelligent macros get a lower yield than, skilled players. This skewing could be introduced slowly, so that the economy could adapt of a period of time.
In short make mining fun and dificult to macro, and most of the rmt would go away in time.
GREAT IDEA!!!! When i started out I EVE mined until I realized how deeply boring and the mere pennies people get from it. The really sad part is how fundamental mining is to EVE and the EVE team made it such a chore. With less macro-mining prices should get better and removing any boredom from it is a godsend.
|

EveBookie
|
Posted - 2008.04.30 01:35:00 -
[234]
This entire topic presents another problem that I am going through at the moment. I log in and am missing 1 billion isk with an evemail saying I bought it. The problem is that I have not only NEVER bought anything for real money, but the only ISK transfers to my account during the last 9 months are from my own account to my own account. Yet, the GM's in their infinite wisdom refuse to do the research they say they will do to get it figured out and I am now getting form replies to petitions. I cant believe that a company the size of CCP cant come up with some way of having decent customer service. You would think that after having made such a huge statement about it they would be a bit more careful about being sure they are punishing those that are guilty and not those that arent.
Please get this sorted Wrangler or Grimmi... |

GEFFI
|
Posted - 2008.04.30 12:02:00 -
[235]
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Our very own Customer Service team has written a blog to inform you all about the Secure ETC Trading System and why it should be used. They+re also informing you of some things you might not have been aware of when it comes to Real Money Trading (RMT) like the fact the people you buy from will steal your credit card information if they get the chance, and ISK sellers are also behind macro mining and other things none of us wish to see in EVE. Pleas read Real Money Trading is bad, mkay? to get the full story!
|

Zian Tzu
|
Posted - 2008.04.30 12:36:00 -
[236]
Originally by: Exa Istari I would like to propose a different solution to empire macro mining...
Make mining in 0.0 MORE profitable. I did a recent survey of some regions in 0.0 and most of the systems only have ORE that can be mined in empire. Most of the rare systems that have the 0.0 high ends are tightly controlled by large alliance that don't like little corps playing in their sandbox.
Think of the implication to this... if 1/4 of the 0.0 systems in Eve had Mercoxit and nearly all of them had Dark Ochre or Gneiss, macro mining would become less profitable and all the things that are good about eve would be enhanced. More people would come to 0.0, pirates would have more targets, corp and smaller alliance would be able to make a profit from doing work in 1 or 2 systems...
My 2 isk.
I agree. That makes 4 isk.
|

Lazare Sauvageot
Carnifex Requiem
|
Posted - 2008.05.01 17:56:00 -
[237]
Originally by: Anatal Klep Intellectual property has nothing to do with it.
Actually, even your own examples/case is completely dependent on IP law, since everything in-game is CCP's IP. Read the legally bindingcontract link that comes up every time you log into the game.
Originally by: Anatal Klep CCP is limiting competition for RMT sales by placing strictures on the existing player base to protect their GTC revenues. In terms of US law that is a combination in restraint of trade because it is artificially preventing participation in the RMT market by competitors to CCP.
In terms of US law, they are maintaining control of the distribution of their own intellectual property. All ISK in-game is CCP's to do with what they will--it doesn't belong to you, it doesn't belong to the companies selling it for hard cash.
Off the top of my head, an equivalent concept would be a publisher suing an author for not allowing them to print the author's books.
Originally by: Anatal Klep One would be hard put to find a clearer case of violation of the US anti-trust laws.
I'm afraid not. US anti-trust protects competitors in an open marketplace from monopolies abusing their position in said marketplace. ISK trading for actual money is not an open marketplace--once again, it is the sole property of CCP, and as such, they are the only person (corporate or otherwise) who can give anyone permission to buy or sell it.
|

RaTTuS
BIG
|
Posted - 2008.05.02 14:41:00 -
[238]
Originally by: EveBookie This entire topic presents another problem that I am going through at the moment. I log in and am missing 1 billion isk with an evemail saying I bought it. The problem is that I have not only NEVER bought anything for real money, but the only ISK transfers to my account during the last 9 months are from my own account to my own account. Yet, the GM's in their infinite wisdom refuse to do the research they say they will do to get it figured out and I am now getting form replies to petitions. I cant believe that a company the size of CCP cant come up with some way of having decent customer service. You would think that after having made such a huge statement about it they would be a bit more careful about being sure they are punishing those that are guilty and not those that arent.
Please get this sorted Wrangler or Grimmi...
Escalte the petiton - as is this monies going to a bought account - the person that sold it may have bought isk - the GM's have been know to make mistakes - then post back here with the conclusion -- BIG Lottery, BIG Deal, InEve
|

Delicious Thighs
|
Posted - 2008.05.06 00:00:00 -
[239]
Actually, I think by saying you can buy ISK but only from us (CCP GTC) is racketeering, no?
|

Fumen
|
Posted - 2008.05.06 00:26:00 -
[240]
Originally by: Delicious Thighs Actually, I think by saying you can buy ISK but only from us (CCP GTC) is racketeering, no?
How do you figure? CCP isn't selling in-game monies for cash (though I know some games that do this). You're buying a GTC from another player that paid for it. CCP is merely facilitating the process to make it as secure as possible, and not charging any extra fees to do so (prev. see SOE's Station Exchange, now part of livegamer.com). This has been going on as long as I have been playing MMOs and MUDs for over 15 years now.
|

dave1
|
Posted - 2008.05.09 11:11:00 -
[241]
hi if there are any GM watching can you please help me here during the last down time a GM took 300million from me and no one has givin me a explination...? iv had a petition oper for 3 days now and you have not answerd me id like a answer soon as i have worked hard for the isk and ships i have. i have never sold or brought any isk before thay can see this buy going throw my wallet and see that i have nor receved any isk form any other players so its pritty oviouse i have not brouight isk so why have you taken it...i want it back.
|

Naridos
Caldari IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
|
Posted - 2008.05.10 01:11:00 -
[242]
I have been meaning to read this blog for some time now and I havent read through any other posts or anything yet as I wanted to post this before my mind was filled with other thoughts on RMT.
Its great that you (CCP) have developed the Game Time Codes for making more ISK but the matter of the fact is, this is also becoming a problem from making isk as well. The prices are still constantly being driven down and the fact that you have to pay so much money for the ISK that you would be receiving is also a problem. How do you plan to fix it when it comes down to the point where people stop buying GTC's because they will only make a little ISK and start buying it from other websites and stuff? I mean, I have looked at other websites and the fact that others offer less money for ISK is still driving them to buy from these websites. So how are you to fix it? Is it possible to place a certain amount of ISK per Time Code? What is to be done about the macros that are still causing problems and driving down prices?
Quote: You Know you play too much Eve when you get into a car crash and you run away as fast as you can so that you don't get podded.
|

Zetjur Jilnou
Rapid Deployment Industries
|
Posted - 2008.05.10 04:07:00 -
[243]
Originally by: Naridos I have been meaning to read this blog for some time now and I havent read through any other posts or anything yet as I wanted to post this before my mind was filled with other thoughts on RMT.
Its great that you (CCP) have developed the Game Time Codes for making more ISK but the matter of the fact is, this is also becoming a problem from making isk as well. The prices are still constantly being driven down and the fact that you have to pay so much money for the ISK that you would be receiving is also a problem. How do you plan to fix it when it comes down to the point where people stop buying GTC's because they will only make a little ISK and start buying it from other websites and stuff? I mean, I have looked at other websites and the fact that others offer less money for ISK is still driving them to buy from these websites. So how are you to fix it? Is it possible to place a certain amount of ISK per Time Code? What is to be done about the macros that are still causing problems and driving down prices?
I think the entire incentive of if you buy ISK from a website not only are you going to have it removed in the future leaving you in the negative, but you risk being banned, is a pretty good one to stop people. It won't stop everyone, however if people insist on buying so much ISK that time codes aren't viable, then they are idiots anyway.
|

Astria Tiphareth
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.05.10 09:19:00 -
[244]
Edited by: Astria Tiphareth on 10/05/2008 09:20:31 9 pages all going to show that the PR exercise has failed again. Some posts are crying hypocrisy without reading the blog, some are touting the usual 'let me police it and make money and killmails, instead of banning' crap, and others are busy suggesting rootkits and IP banning, as though those have never been tried before...
Having trawled through all 9 pages, read the blog, read several economic analyses of ISK/Gold selling in MMOs, I can say the following:
- Well done CCP for attempting to do something about the spam, it really has gone down
- Well done CCP for attempting to deal with ISK trade, but you're onto a losing battle
- Well done CCP for having the ingenuity to come up with the GTC model
- Rather poorly done CCP on the marketing front, as every idiot out there is still peddling their own 'clue' about how it all really works and could be fixed
C'est la vie. People play a game for 4-5 years and suddenly think they own the place. ___ "If you can't debate using logic & fact, and at least recognise other people's point of view, don't waste time posting on forums. It only makes you look like a teenage idiot." |

Bentula
|
Posted - 2008.05.13 17:59:00 -
[245]
Originally by: Astria Tiphareth
C'est la vie. People play a game for 4-5 years and suddenly think they own the place.
QFT. This is their game, their servers and their IP. And stop bringing up RL economy laws, for all purposes we might as well talk about monopoly money here, its not real get it? You pay to play the game, not to earn some fictional money for your old days.
If there really are people spending thousands of dollars for what is in effect play money, send them my way i have a nice bridge im looking to sell .
P.S. People should be more worried about what our various governments do with our taxes, instead of the policy a game publisher follows regarding his play money.
|

RUS RIDDIK
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 05:41:00 -
[246]
All should understand, that where it is possible to receive profit there there will be "clever men" which will realise it. That is even if CCP ban who sells those ISK, he will create 30 000 more different aliases, references and will receive all the same profit. And so will last infinitely. CCP it is necessary to understand, that eve has already quitted for sides - "simply games!" Some stay in it for 18 hours a day and for them eve it already a way of life. So why not to give these people to earn? For example: to create in eve bank to register or enter skills that it was possible to execute processes for sale ISK, and accordingly to limit those who is going to to buy ISK for real money. CCP it is necessary to switch on a brain and to take trade ISK under the control. CCP will receive from it percent. (What? Experts) let think. One easy motion throws out from the market intermediaries and unscrpulous shopkeepers. It is necessary it is all to consider seriously to enter limitation for purchasing. Here some speak, type game will lose sense - is not present will not lose! It will quit on newer level and will add a new trade. CCP it is necessary to think of this question. And after its careful analysis to give the chance to people to earn on those who wants that on them have earned. But I will recurring - it is necessary to consider well and probably to begin with easier to select from players - the best, to give the rights, and after the test already to finish and realise all. But limitations should be unconditionally. Bought ISK should not be passed, exchange on the goods and so on …
P.S. Sorry for bad English
|

RUS RIDDIK
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 05:56:00 -
[247]
Cease to struggle with them, it is time to receive already benefit from it as, to you have thrown idea... 
|

Riffler
|
Posted - 2008.07.14 11:50:00 -
[248]
CCP have made progress in combatting spam and sales, for which they deserves thanks - from everyone.
However, it doesn't look like they're close to really eliminating the problem, and I don't understand why not. It can't be that difficult to trace sold ISK back to it's source, to track down characters used to farm ISK and the means used to transfer it. However it's done, it can be traced if CCP want to. Banning the disposable characters and accounts involved in the sales side is no victory at all - it's the rather-less-easily-replaced characters and accounts that are generating the ISK for sale that should be the real targets.
After all, given how useless extra ISK is at the start of a character's career, and how likely (I hope) that titan-scale ISK buying will be caught, it's the generation of ISK for sale, whether by macro mining or complex farming that damages the average player more than the actual sale and purchase of ISK.
|

Red Thunder
Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.07.26 22:04:00 -
[249]
ccp is doing nothing about this.....i report loads of isk farmers who sit there almost 24/7 just ratting away and instalogging when you hit local, and yet i still see absolutely 0 bans.....ccp, if this isnt the source of isk for the sellers, then what is????
Eagles may soar, but weasels dont get sucked into jet engines |

FDUSPYZOR
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.07.27 11:13:00 -
[250]
Originally by: Delicious Thighs Actually, I think by saying you can buy ISK but only from us (CCP GTC) is racketeering, no?
No. It's hypocritical.
CCP need to practice what they preach and stop the selling of GTCs for Isk.
|

Vargrh
Gallente Medo.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:47:00 -
[251]
Originally by: FDUSPYZOR
Originally by: Delicious Thighs Actually, I think by saying you can buy ISK but only from us (CCP GTC) is racketeering, no?
No. It's hypocritical.
CCP need to practice what they preach and stop the selling of GTCs for Isk.
It allows players who might not have access to rl funds to finance their game play therefore it increases the player base and is intrinsically a good thing. CCP get the same money regardless.
|

Malachon Draco
eXceed Inc. eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 18:49:00 -
[252]
In other news, sniffing glue while designing games is also bad. Just look at CCP Nozh to see the results of what happens if you do that.
|

Raagh Krgha
|
Posted - 2008.07.31 06:55:00 -
[253]
Edited by: Raagh Krgha on 31/07/2008 06:56:38 Edited by: Raagh Krgha on 31/07/2008 06:56:12 There are in fact some very simple mechanics to do some against isk sellers, because of this:
isk sellers need to tell people about their service and there is no better place than spamming within the game resulting in a large number of players blocking them immediatly whenever they spam their "gods" into channels, because they tend to produce macro spamming with a period of less than 10 seconds, rendering chat unreadable.  So, when some large number of players block a single address, this would be the moment where it might become usefull to take a look what the massivly blocked player actually posts into channels ... does not seem to be much too dificult to implement into the game to have clients sending a block notify to a server that collects them only on count and on triggering a threshold value gives allert and a small chat log report to GM by email or anything. 
Well, I am just a simple minded person in real world, but in my eyes this seems to be some blacklist counting mechanic not too hard to implement after all ... solving the problem at it's very root, which is in fact not the generation of isk for sale but the advertisment that is neccessary to place generated isk on the "player market" ingame. 
By that's just my 2 cents...
|

Bak Vlok
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2008.08.17 13:51:00 -
[254]
So what of the fact that a word filter for the chat is about 3 lines of python? The spammers can even advertise their URLs 
|

Hew Jardon
|
Posted - 2008.08.17 15:58:00 -
[255]
Originally by: GM Krymus I completely understand your concerns with regards to this. You may or may not have noticed the dramatic reduction in spam since the deployment of Trinity 1.1, in which a large number of features (as mentioned in the dev blog) were introduced. I agree that if any spam is able to get through (which, unfortunately, some still does) then there is room for improvement. Please be assured that we will continue to work on developing tools to prevent spam from reaching players.
I don't know how they did it, but in EQ2, they manage to redirect all spam to a spam channel. Perhaps you could look into this?
|

Tehopenee
|
Posted - 2008.08.25 22:53:00 -
[256]
So buying isk with real money is bad? Fancy that---not being able to go after thieves is good. Makes me kind of wonder. I dont buy isk---I would consider it scamming but it cant be scaming as that is allowed in eve. I am getting terribly confused. I like the game but the inequitys favored by ccp really sucks sometimes. :)
|

Tehopenee
|
Posted - 2008.08.25 22:54:00 -
[257]
Originally by: Delicious Thighs Actually, I think by saying you can buy ISK but only from us (CCP GTC) is racketeering, no?
|

RaTTuS
BIG Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2008.08.29 10:31:00 -
[258]
 buying GTC for isk is not the same as ccp selling isk - this is because it is the players who provide the isk not ccp out of the magic hat
-- BIG Lottery, BIG Deal, InEve
|

Arachna
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 18:03:00 -
[259]
You see dozens of macro miners/missioners, if u report them u get no answer and you still see them flying around for years now.
And now you make dev blog how its all bad and stuff... yeah no shit ccp how about banning them???
|

Magojiro Matsumoto
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 21:31:00 -
[260]
Edited by: Magojiro Matsumoto on 02/09/2008 21:38:06
The problem is some people will still go on buying currency from ISK selers because they remain way cheaper than ETC system.
So even if there's a risk, some players would take it cheaper and get more via ISK sellers.
Example : $34 = 400m ( about that on the ETC sale forum ) $33 = 1000m ( from some random ISK seller site I googled )
Pretty obvious to me why some guys may choose to get more than twice what you get from 1 ETC, even with the risk implied :/
I'm not asking CCP to align ISK sellers prices, even if it might actually drive them away once and for good if they see the rentabilitiy isn't good enough to keep up, but for sure it's not gonna be an easy battle.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: [one page] |