| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 14:41:00 -
[61] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Crellion wrote:I disagree that it has been like this for ages and no one complains. Yeah, no, that's not really what I said, so I don't know what you're disagreeing with here. Can't tell you now I am 3 legal documents down the line too l8 in the day... read again it might help or not. Quote:As to your main thrust that actually specializing is currently less rewarded than corsstraining (I do hope you mean RACIAL crosstraining because that is what I am discussing /proposing) then I disagree There is no other form of cross-training. Why do you disagree?
I think 99% of the siruations are covered with two races and the rest is just added flavor no real advantage. Whereas getting a new class in the same time does provide actual advantages. I did say however I disagree, but... agian refer back if need be too tired here too l8 in the day with a difficult S&P transaction. Sorry for messing up the immersion :)
EDIT Went and found it: I said I disagree "but if you are right then indeed the whole thread is moot and no change is needed."
What I am looking for is the CCP carrot to ocnvince you to build a character sideways past the first 2 races and all the way to the 4th... INSTEAD of using the same time / SP investment to go up into more classes. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 14:47:00 -
[62] - Quote
Andrea Griffin wrote:Pheusia wrote:What are you talking about? Getting access to 5 new T2 cruisers at level 5 is an incredible incentive to train another Cruiser 5. This is the reason my PvP pilot has yet to stick a single battleship skill into her brain. Three years and nothing but frigates and cruisers. I'm running out of frigate / cruiser level stuff to train though. Ohnoes. : < I don't regret training this way - the amount of stuff I can fly is mind boggling and I have a ship for every occasion. Even though it would benefit me, I don't see a need for a "its like every ship but better" thing floating around. Also, where would it fit in lore-wise? Would the Jovians be making these ships? I'm not sure that they would even be flown much anyway. Specialization beats generalization, and I would rather have CCP work on ships that fill a specific role and would actually be useful. The All Four Uber Race ship just doesn't sound like it would add much to the game other than a gimmick.
In your 3 years spent on cruisers did you first do ALL 4 races HACs, or first a HAC then a Recon, then a Hictor then another race HAC or Recon and so on and so forth.
It might be that deep down you agree with some of what I say... |

Halete
Almost Epic
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 15:57:00 -
[63] - Quote
The carrot to cross-train is already there. Explain how you're finding 2 races fit 99% of situations? Generic small-time hero-tackle pilot with no relevance. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5612
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:10:00 -
[64] - Quote
Crellion wrote:I think 99% of the siruations are covered with two races and the rest is just added flavor no real advantage. Yeah, no. Each race has its strengths and weaknesses, often across completely different classes of ships.
Quote:I did say however I disagree Yes, but why?
Quote:In your 3 years spent on cruisers did you first do ALL 4 races HACs, or first a HAC then a Recon, then a Hictor then another race HAC or Recon and so on and so forth. The latter way of training isn't even possible, you know that right? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Halete
Almost Epic
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:18:00 -
[65] - Quote
The thing I don't get is, I think almost every person in this thread is cross-training. It's not like this is a case of the Rock saying that Scissors is fine. Generic small-time hero-tackle pilot with no relevance. |

Nex apparatu5
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
227
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:44:00 -
[66] - Quote
Halete wrote:The thing I don't get is, I think almost every person in this thread is cross-training. It's not like this is a case of the Rock saying that Scissors is fine.
It's a guy who wants to introduce "gun" to rock paper scissors because he's been playing for longer than they have and wondering why people are getting mad at upsetting the balance. |

Buzzmong
Aliastra Gallente Federation
162
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:58:00 -
[67] - Quote
The "ships" proposed in the OP are the equivalent of bringing a tactical nuke to a game of rock-paper-scissors.
For those not in the know, rock-paper-scissors is how EVE is designed on the ships/weapons front. Everything has a hard counter in the form of another system (well, ECM is marginal).
The OP proposing ships where the only counter would be more of them. Which is the problem CCP are just dealing with for Super Carriers and Titans. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
876
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:15:00 -
[68] - Quote
If you are really that bored you can always train for sancha carrier, looks awesome but seems no one wants it (I do, send me the bpo ! )
I'm against something that will obviously and once again profit to older players. If you don't understand why then let me ask you why shouldn't the sp reward go accordingly with time spent/invested playing the game.
I'll finish with a no no no no and again, no |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
679
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:08:00 -
[69] - Quote
Relevant.
Ed: I might actually start linking videos of cats saying "nononono" on all bad idea threads. I'm not sure if there are more videos than threads or vice versa. Rifterlings - Small gang lowsec combat corp specializing in frigates and cruisers (all races, not just Rifters!). US Timezone veterans and newbies alike are welcome to join. Come chat in the "we fly rifters" in-game channel. Free fitted frigates for members! |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1072
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:12:00 -
[70] - Quote
I personally don't mind faction ships that require all racial ship skills at 3-5. I'd expect the ships to be somewhere between pirate ships and T3s in both cost and ability. I'd rather have them rebalance the Tier system though.
/shrug
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1072
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:21:00 -
[71] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Relevant.Ed: I might actually start linking videos of cats saying "nononono" on all bad idea threads. I'm not sure if there are more videos than threads or vice versa.
Waaaay more bad ideas than videos...
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
679
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:00:00 -
[72] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:I personally don't mind faction ships that require all racial ship skills at 3-5. I'd expect the ships to be somewhere between pirate ships and T3s in both cost and ability. I'd rather have them rebalance the Tier system though.
/shrug
-Liang Jovian faction ships?  Rifterlings - Small gang lowsec combat corp specializing in frigates and cruisers (all races, not just Rifters!). US Timezone veterans and newbies alike are welcome to join. Come chat in the "we fly rifters" in-game channel. Free fitted frigates for members! |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1074
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:02:00 -
[73] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:I personally don't mind faction ships that require all racial ship skills at 3-5. I'd expect the ships to be somewhere between pirate ships and T3s in both cost and ability. I'd rather have them rebalance the Tier system though.
/shrug
-Liang Jovian faction ships? 
Meh, doesn't have to be Jovian. But I'm totally fine with more faction ships. I would be though, eh?
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Mfume Apocal
Origin.
349
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 21:46:00 -
[74] - Quote
Yo, Thukker mix, Minmatar speed/agility, Caldari missiles.
**** would own so hard. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1076
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 21:50:00 -
[75] - Quote
Mfume Apocal wrote:Yo, Thukker mix, Minmatar speed/agility, Caldari missiles.
**** would own so hard.
+1, confirming I would like to see this. :)
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Verity Sovereign
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
143
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 06:37:00 -
[76] - Quote
Jove ships as T2 Pirate/Navy/Faction ships!
Winmatar skill boosts their speed and tracking Caldari skill boosts their optimal and shield resists Amarr skill boosts their laser damage and ROF Gallente skill boosts their armor resist and gives drone bonuses
turret # is halved, with a +100% laser damage bonus like on marauders/the nightmare
[sarcasm]It'd be completely balanced, so you can make them as common as T1 ships, and not restrict the supply to a very small number of BPCs given out per year[/sarcasm] |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
234
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 07:57:00 -
[77] - Quote
Verity Sovereign wrote:[sarcasm]It'd be completely balanced, so you can make them as common as T1 ships, and not restrict the supply to a very small number of BPCs given out per year[/sarcasm] Make it require all racial battlecruiser and destroyer V. After the change that is. And lose skillpoints when you get blown up.
Or subsystems, I guess. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

Halete
Almost Epic
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 07:54:00 -
[78] - Quote
I'm not fundamentally against faction ships that require all racials. Seems like it could be cool.
... You know, so long as they aren't balanced as OP is suggesting. Also, there's a kind of bitter sweetness after seeing this thread get more support (against it) after being up for 40 hours and getting on the EVE forums (from the office, so don't even suggest sleeping). Generic small-time hero-tackle pilot with no relevance. |

Nnam Pir
Nnam Fleet
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 11:34:00 -
[79] - Quote
The big benefit of cross-training for other race's ships is the extra options. That alone is a big benefit. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 12:41:00 -
[80] - Quote
Nnam Pir wrote:The big benefit of cross-training for other race's ships is the extra options. That alone is a big benefit.
It was a huge benefit 5 years ago, especially from having one race to having two races vessels at your disposal. Is that still the case after all weapon systems and vessels beconing more and more same-ish over the years? Is it rwardign enough to go from 3 races to 4 as well??? Compared with the advantages of gaining other ship classes in the same type?
|

Halete
Almost Epic
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 12:42:00 -
[81] - Quote
That's what everyone keeps telling you. What isn't there to understand? Generic small-time hero-tackle pilot with no relevance. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 12:43:00 -
[82] - Quote
Halete wrote:I'm not fundamentally against faction ships that require all racials. Seems like it could be cool.
... You know, so long as they aren't balanced as OP is suggesting. Also, there's a kind of bitter sweetness after seeing this thread get more support (against it) after being up for 40 hours and getting on the EVE forums (from the office, so don't even suggest sleeping).
Silly person the suggestion is the idea and the need behind it. Values at this stage (months before a dev even says it sounds interesting or not, let alone implementation) are arbitrary.
Please do not be bitter, even if bitter sweet. Please see only the prospect of the community gaining something from this thread. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 12:45:00 -
[83] - Quote
Halete wrote:That's what everyone keeps telling you. What isn't there to understand?
Assuming you refer to post 80 can you explain how if the siruation was balanced to begin with all the changes I refer too fail to change the balance?
|

Halete
Almost Epic
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 12:53:00 -
[84] - Quote
Okay, you can tell that (that you are silly people and this was your ploy all along!) to every single other person in this thread saying the same thing as me rather than singling me out as you continue to do.
Except then you'd be directly contradicting the point you keep making that you think the SPs should reward you with ISK efficiency etc. etc. and all the other points you have been reinforcing throughout the thread.
Sigh.
Just going to leave this here since you are undoubtedly going to point out how much of an idiot and wrong I am about that, whilst disregarding everyone else who was for the all-racial idea along with me.
ShahFluffers wrote:One of the base principles in EVE is that every advantage you gain comes at exponentially increased cost (and/or risk). This is what keeps "everyone" from strictly flying T2 and T3 ships (i.e. "better" ships) and keeps T1 ships more or less viable after about 10 years of the game being in existence.
Crellion wrote: YES DUDE THATS THE POINT I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS BASIC PRINCIPLE I THINK THEY SHOULD CHANGE IT. YOU THINK CCP IS INFALLIBLE?
Yep, merely suggesting all-racial with arbitrary values.
In unrelated news, you seem to have quite the vendetta against me so I'm going to vanish before someone says something regrettable. Generic small-time hero-tackle pilot with no relevance. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 13:06:00 -
[85] - Quote
Halete wrote:Okay, you can tell that to every single other person in this thread saying the same thing as me rather than singling me out as you continue to do.
Except then you'd be directly contradicting the point you keep making that you think the SPs should reward you with ISK efficiency etc. etc. and all the other points you have been reinforcing throughout the thread.
Sigh.
Tell that what?
You refer to a post and I ask for an explannation in very polite terms and looking to be enlightened. All the other personal sentimental stuff is redundant dude... really.
|

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 13:26:00 -
[86] - Quote
Crellion wrote:Nnam Pir wrote:The big benefit of cross-training for other race's ships is the extra options. That alone is a big benefit. It was a huge benefit 5 years ago, especially from having one race to having two races vessels at your disposal. Is that still the case after all weapon systems and vessels beconing more and more same-ish over the years? Is it rwardign enough to go from 3 races to 4 as well??? Compared with the advantages of gaining other ship classes in the same type?
Y E S |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 13:46:00 -
[87] - Quote
Halete wrote:Okay, you can tell that (that you are silly people and this was your ploy all along!) to every single other person in this thread saying the same thing as me rather than singling me out as you continue to do. Except then you'd be directly contradicting the point you keep making that you think the SPs should reward you with ISK efficiency etc. etc. and all the other points you have been reinforcing throughout the thread. Sigh. Just going to leave this here since you are undoubtedly going to point out how much of an idiot and wrong I am about that, whilst disregarding everyone else who was for the all-racial idea along with me. ShahFluffers wrote:One of the base principles in EVE is that every advantage you gain comes at exponentially increased cost (and/or risk). This is what keeps "everyone" from strictly flying T2 and T3 ships (i.e. "better" ships) and keeps T1 ships more or less viable after about 10 years of the game being in existence. Crellion wrote: YES DUDE THATS THE POINT I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS BASIC PRINCIPLE I THINK THEY SHOULD CHANGE IT. YOU THINK CCP IS INFALLIBLE?
Yep, merely suggesting all-racial with arbitrary values. In unrelated news, you seem to have quite the vendetta against me so I'm going to vanish before someone says something regrettable.
A) I thought in my previosu post I made it obvious there is nothign perosnal.
B) Now that you edited your post all the stuff you inputed helps me understand you. Indeed part of my OP was why to always get more expensive ships for performance increase and that I would like a scaling where a lot of training can get you a modest performance increase (how modest at present unknown... let's say between tech I and tech II) at the cost of tech I. This could be with new vessels as per OP, or bleeding effect of "cousin" skills etc etc. Indeed most people have diagreed flat out in this thread to cosnider this. Why, I am not sure exactly but this is indeed the case.
C) The post tat started todays tirade was like this: a gentleman expressed an opinion (post 79) and I replied with a question (post 80). Thereafter you said, in so many words, "why ask him everyone says no". This however was not about having a reward from training without isk increase (again I still suppor tht too but no one else seems to agree). This was about whether versatility was enough of a reward of crosstraining or not. Therein I expressed my question in post 80 and you are still wellcome to comment if you like, or not.
I repeat for clarity there is nothing personal in all of this. Just review post 80 please. If the answer is "perhaps the balance has indeed shifted somewhat" then we need to discuss a balancing act. I prefer buffing to nerfing so I suggested that. My original values were very much in your face humongous to provoce a bit of a stir and for the sake of simplicity but let us dicsuss the need for change (or lack thereof) before we get lost in the quagmire of percentages... |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 13:47:00 -
[88] - Quote
Pheusia wrote:Crellion wrote:Nnam Pir wrote:The big benefit of cross-training for other race's ships is the extra options. That alone is a big benefit. It was a huge benefit 5 years ago, especially from having one race to having two races vessels at your disposal. Is that still the case after all weapon systems and vessels beconing more and more same-ish over the years? Is it rwardign enough to go from 3 races to 4 as well??? Compared with the advantages of gaining other ship classes in the same type? Y E S
Seems like an oxymoron. If the answer is yes then 5 yeas ago it would be Hell yes. Yet still 5 years ago the smart move was to specialize before crosstraining beyond a second race... I wonder why...
EDIT For curiosity can we hear from anyone who has say all 4 races recons and Hictors and as to what they think 4 races offer over 2 or 3.. Do you out there who has done it feel rewarded enough? |

Halete
Almost Epic
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 13:54:00 -
[89] - Quote
If you insist;
I said everyone says YES (see #86). The reason no further explanation was offered is because people have repeated the same points over and over and I don't want to beat the dead horse. Cross-training for versatility is it's own reward.
Also, the reason it feels personal is because quite a few people are echoing my own posts, but you only single mine out with the belittling and demeaning comments - and you have insisted that I am either blatantly wrong or misunderstanding the entire thread, whilst offering very little foundations for why - and when it is not really me you should be addressing, but rather EVERYONE who is replying to you.
Generic small-time hero-tackle pilot with no relevance. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 13:58:00 -
[90] - Quote
Halete wrote:If you insist;
I said everyone says YES (see #86). The reason no further explanation was offered is because people have repeated the same points over and over and I don't want to beat the dead horse. Cross-training for versatility is it's own reward.
Also, the reason it feels personal is because quite a few people are echoing my own posts, but you only single mine out with the belittling and demeaning comments - and you have insisted that I am either blatantly wrong or misunderstanding the entire thread, whilst offering very little foundations for why - and when it is not really me you should be addressing, but rather EVERYONE who is replying to you.
I tried to reply to most everyone. If they simply disagreed I tried to demonstrate my point of view in a different light. Not that it has made a huge difference, grant you.
You on the other hand have been helpfull with some posts but out right wrong and missing the point in others. In those posts I replied not in order to chastice or belittle you but because they were giving false impressions of what I was saying.
I not however that you feel sympathetic to all races skill requiring faction ships. So does this mean you accept the need for a bit more reward fom crosstraining yourself? Is it only the cheap ships I aksed for that you did not like? |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |