| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Halete
Almost Epic
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 14:26:00 -
[91] - Quote
There's that "you've been wrong" card again. Again, I only echo what many other people are saying.
When I use sarcasm, hyperbole, deadpan humour and say things like "Miner Is should buff Projectile Turrets too", that's on purpose. It's not because I'm such a wildly idiotic, crazy person. It's to make myself sound ridiculous so that you have a frame of reference for how other-worldly your ideas actually sound to me.
Hope this clears things up, Generic small-time hero-tackle pilot with no relevance. |

Tobiaz
Spacerats
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 14:45:00 -
[92] - Quote
Racial cross-training already provides a huge benefit: you can fly ships of other races. http://go-dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Tobiaz/sig_complaints.gif
How about fixing image-linking on the forums, CCP? I want to see signatures! |

FT Diomedes
Factio Paucorum
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 14:50:00 -
[93] - Quote
Crellion wrote:[quote=Pheusia][quote=Crellion][quote=Nnam Pir]The big benefit of cross-training for other race's ships is the extra options. That alone
EDIT For curiosity can we hear from anyone who has say all 4 races recons and Hictors and as to what they think 4 races offer over 2 or 3.. Do you out there who has done it feel rewarded enough? Yes, I have done this. It gives flexibility and diversity. That is the benefit. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 15:18:00 -
[94] - Quote
FT Diomedes wrote:Crellion wrote:[quote=Pheusia][quote=Crellion][quote=Nnam Pir]The big benefit of cross-training for other race's ships is the extra options. That alone
EDIT For curiosity can we hear from anyone who has say all 4 races recons and Hictors and as to what they think 4 races offer over 2 or 3.. Do you out there who has done it feel rewarded enough? Yes, I have done this. It gives flexibility and diversity. That is the benefit.
Thank you very much FT Diomedes for your answer. Have you found this versatility very helpful in your long pvp carrier. Were there times when six HACs at your disposal just would not cut it and you needed desperately that last race to be competitive? Did the substantial advantages of the fourth race figure prominently on the road to amassing your career kills as they appear on battleclinic?
I ask because I always made do with two and thought the additional two would not be that helpful...
Ok then I consider this thread done as Ft D and Tobiaz share so much pvp experience between them is pointless to insist. Mods please close the thread... |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1082
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 16:30:00 -
[95] - Quote
Crellion wrote: Thank you very much FT Diomedes for your answer. Have you found this versatility very helpful in your long pvp carrier. Were there times when six HACs at your disposal just would not cut it and you needed desperately that last race to be competitive? Did the substantial advantages of the fourth race figure prominently on the road to amassing your career kills as they appear on battleclinic?
I fly everything and I feel really limited when I'm restricted to only 1-2 races. My recently known ships (Involved with a noticeable number of kills in the last 2 months): - Amarr: Oracle, Geddon, Slicer, Curse - Minmatar: Rupture, Hurricane, Hound, (Loki, Scimitar, Cheetah) - Gallente: Talos, Taranis, Brutix, Lachesis - Caldari: Harpy, Manticore, Drake, (Basilisk, Tengu)
Brackets indicate commonly used support ships that don't appear on mails. I have a Legion but we don't ever run armor gangs so I don't fly it.
/shrug
-Liang
Ed: Ruppie, Cane, Hound kills are from an alt. He is cross trained but seems to have a thing for Minnie ships (despite being stronger in Amarr... -_-) Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

FT Diomedes
Factio Paucorum
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 04:46:00 -
[96] - Quote
It's true, I don't PvP very much on this account. Do you want a cookie?
Still, since this character is an elite carebear, I will say that crosstraining has paid off immensely on the PvE front too. I don't get bored as often because I can switch to any subcapital ship and fly it with equal skills. And I can always choose the right tool for the job. Being able to switch on a whim between a Paladin, a Machariel, and a Tengu is very nice for PvE.
I can fly every frigate on my primary PvP account - that keeps me from being a one-trick pony. The ability to keep your opponents guessing what you will be in and how you will be fit can be a real advantage when you keep fighting the same folks over and over again. It's particularly nice when you can swap between different Stealth Bombers to hit the right resist hole. Now if I could just get some decent kills with the aforementioned Stealth Bombers, that would be very nice.
When I used to PvP in larger ships, I found versatility especially nice in the Recon department. The ability to switch at will between the Arazu, Falcon, Pilgrim, and Rapier can give you an advantage when you are hunting people. |

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 10:08:00 -
[97] - Quote
Crellion wrote: Were there times when six HACs at your disposal just would not cut it and you needed desperately that last race to be competitive?
I'll answer that question on my own behalf: yes.
When you need a long range DPS ship to keep Falcons off the field, there's no HAC that will come close to the Cerberus. When you need a hgh speed anti-support/heavy tackle/hit-and-run ship, then other HACs are a poor subsitute for the Vagabond. When you need HAC that can use drones, then the Ishtar is the only reasonably choice. When you want to join an AHAC fleet, the Zealot is convincingly superior to the other HACs.
The Recons have distinct enough roles that the advantages of being able to use them all are too obvious to need explaining.
HICs are a little less obvious, but still, you will definitely want to be able to fly both a shield and an armour HIC. The Devoter is significantly better than the Phobos for "big fleet" work due to its resist profile and incredible EHP, while the Phobos is better for lo-sec work. There's not really much to choose between the Onyx and the Broadsword IMO.The Onyx is a little better at providing supplementary DPS, the Broadsword is more agile.
The true advantage I have been able to derive from cross-training rather than specialising is that when the FC announces "Tonight's fleet is a $DOCTRINE fleet" I am always able to fill at least one, usually more, role in the fleet in the ship best suited to it. If the FC wants to try out a concept Gallente Battlecruiser fleet, I can fly that BC. If he wants an all-Ishtar fleet, I can do that. If he's short on Interdictors, I can swap out to whatever spare dictor hull someone has lying around.
(The irony is that I am posting this with a relatively specialised alt; my main - Malcanis - is the omnitasker. But even this semi-specialised alt is busy cross-training right now, and she can fly the very few ships that Malc can't) |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 10:27:00 -
[98] - Quote
Pheusia wrote:Crellion wrote: Were there times when six HACs at your disposal just would not cut it and you needed desperately that last race to be competitive? I'll answer that question on my own behalf: yes. When you need a long range DPS ship to keep Falcons off the field, there's no HAC that will come close to the Cerberus. When you need a hgh speed anti-support/heavy tackle/hit-and-run ship, then other HACs are a poor subsitute for the Vagabond. When you need HAC that can use drones, then the Ishtar is the only reasonably choice. When you want to join an AHAC fleet, the Zealot is convincingly superior to the other HACs. The Recons have distinct enough roles that the advantages of being able to use them all are too obvious to need explaining. HICs are a little less obvious, but still, you will definitely want to be able to fly both a shield and an armour HIC. The Devoter is significantly better than the Phobos for "big fleet" work due to its resist profile and incredible EHP, while the Phobos is better for lo-sec work. There's not really much to choose between the Onyx and the Broadsword IMO.The Onyx is a little better at providing supplementary DPS, the Broadsword is more agile. The true advantage I have been able to derive from cross-training rather than specialising is that when the FC announces "Tonight's fleet is a $DOCTRINE fleet" I am always able to fill at least one, usually more, role in the fleet in the ship best suited to it. If the FC wants to try out a concept Gallente Battlecruiser fleet, I can fly that BC. If he wants an all-Ishtar fleet, I can do that. If he's short on Interdictors, I can swap out to whatever spare dictor hull someone has lying around. (The irony is that I am posting this with a relatively specialised alt; my main - Malcanis - is the omnitasker. But even this semi-specialised alt is busy cross-training right now, and she can fly the very few ships that Malc can't)
Well I do not disagree as such. I have also made sure I have all 4 races (albeit acroos 2 chars). However when discussing balance you have to put things into perspective. Again nothing new in this post its all been said above too but just to make it, perhaps, clearer.
All 8 HACs gives nice versatility, but 6 HACs and 2 Reckons gives a lot more versatility... Hece versatility is erroneously quoted as the satisfying answer to the question: What is the incentive of traininng the 4th race.
The question also have to be put into context, because no one (or very few) has 200 mill SPs. Therefore: The question is NOT: "What is the incentive for training the 4th race" but rather "What is the incentive for training the 4th race INSTEAD of something else"
A very simple statement but therein for me lies the heart of the matter.
However as I said above, if I am the only one who sees this, right or wrong, it does not matter, it can be ignored. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5699
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 10:29:00 -
[99] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:Racial cross-training already provides a huge benefit: you can fly ships of other races. Let's just repeat this one more time GÇö more benefit than this really isn't needed since it's a huge pay-off in and of itself.
The reason people keep specialising after all these years, even given the massive benefits of cross-training is that specialising lets you become good, fast. That's a completely different benefit that is more valuable in the short run. Cross-training does not do that: it lets you become versatile, slowly. The (drastically) increased value of that versatility over simply being able to get in the fight is what makes it reasonable that it takes so long.
You can get versatile quick, but you give up the benefit that specialisation provides by doing so: you don't become as good.
It's a balance act and a decisions point GÇö each way has its own distinct advantages and none of them need any specific rewards because they are all more than sufficiently rewarding for what you have to do to get them.
Crellion wrote:The question also have to be put into context, because no one (or very few) has 200 mill SPs. Therefore: The question is NOT: "What is the incentive for training the 4th race" but rather "What is the incentive for training the 4th race INSTEAD of something else" Because it adds significant value to what you have already trained. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 11:09:00 -
[100] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tobiaz wrote:Racial cross-training already provides a huge benefit: you can fly ships of other races. Let's just repeat this one more time GÇö more benefit than this really isn't needed since it's a huge pay-off in and of itself. The reason people keep specialising after all these years, even given the massive benefits of cross-training is that specialising lets you become good, fast. That's a completely different benefit that is more valuable in the short run. Cross-training does not do that: it lets you become versatile, slowly. The (drastically) increased value of that versatility over simply being able to get in the fight is what makes it reasonable that it takes so long. You can get versatile quick, but you give up the benefit that specialisation provides by doing so: you don't become as good. It's a balance act and a decisions point GÇö each way has its own distinct advantages and none of them need any specific rewards because they are all more than sufficiently rewarding for what you have to do to get them. Crellion wrote:The question also have to be put into context, because no one (or very few) has 200 mill SPs. Therefore: The question is NOT: "What is the incentive for training the 4th race" but rather "What is the incentive for training the 4th race INSTEAD of something else" Because it adds significant value to what you have already trained.
Adding significant value does not cut it. The whole discussion is comparison of the added vvalue form the one with the added value from the other. See my previous post.
Saying 4th race is useful is not enough IMO. You have to look at whether it is as useful as doing something else with your training time. Here there is an imbalance. I attmpted to identify it in my previous post. Perhaps review it. (post 98) |

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 11:19:00 -
[101] - Quote
Let's look at this a different way:
Everybody cross trains in one way or another.
Some players prioritize cross training across classes - from frigate to cruiser to ballteship to capital - to gain the versatility of being able to use different ship sizes. Other players focus more on cross training across races to gain the versatility of the different racial specialities. Many do a sort of compromise, racing to battlecruisers or battleships before starting to cross train to add racial versatility. Eventually if you keep on training you'll do both kinds of cross training to their logical conclusion and be able to fly "everything".
All we're really doing is arguing about the route to the final destination. It's not obvious to me that specialising in cross-training races should get a special bonus that specialising in cross training classes doesn't, any more than going 100 yards north then 100 yards west should lead you to a different destination or take less time than going 100 yards west then 100 yards north. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 11:32:00 -
[102] - Quote
Pheusia wrote:Let's look at this a different way: Everybody cross trains in one way or another. Some players prioritize cross training across classes - from frigate to cruiser to ballteship to capital - to gain the versatility of being able to use different ship sizes. Other players focus more on cross training across races to gain the versatility of the different racial specialities. Many do a sort of compromise, racing to battlecruisers or battleships before starting to cross train to add racial versatility. Eventually if you keep on training you'll do both kinds of cross training to their logical conclusion and be able to fly "everything". All we're really doing is arguing about the route to the final destination. It's not obvious to me that specialising in cross-training races should get a special bonus that specialising in cross training classes doesn't, any more than going 100 yards north then 100 yards west should lead you to a different destination or take less time than going 100 yards west then 100 yards north.
I think now you are a lot closer to what I mean. Perhaps you have even hit the nail on the head...
Indeed the issue I have is that going further down the different classes corridor confers higher advantages to the player, progressively, than exploring all four rooms in every stage of the corridor.
In particular going down the corridor or explotig the second room seem to be an equal choice or perhpas even on the favor of the 2nd room. However proceeding down the corridor is definately better than entering the 3rd room and ridiculously better than going for the 4th room.
Because of this I am suggesting incentives for people to loiter around and clear the fourth room too, if you like.
You say that the logical conclusion is that in the end you will fly everything. Looking at the progression of the game in the last 7 years when I have been playing (on and off) I doubt that but thw correct answer does not matter. I am looking at the returns one gets in the years spent getting there rather than what it will be like if and when you reach...
I completely agree with you that there should be no advantage for follwoing this or that direction. However at present there is a practical advantage in severely tempering or even foregoing racial training of the 3rd and 4th race. I would like to see an incentive that would make it equally advantageous to go for the 4th race than it is to spend the same training time to get a new ship class.
Finally let me say people do not have to agree and the change never actually has to happen but I do want us to be on the same page as to what is being proposed and why.
|

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 11:40:00 -
[103] - Quote
Crellion wrote:Pheusia wrote:Let's look at this a different way: Everybody cross trains in one way or another. Some players prioritize cross training across classes - from frigate to cruiser to ballteship to capital - to gain the versatility of being able to use different ship sizes. Other players focus more on cross training across races to gain the versatility of the different racial specialities. Many do a sort of compromise, racing to battlecruisers or battleships before starting to cross train to add racial versatility. Eventually if you keep on training you'll do both kinds of cross training to their logical conclusion and be able to fly "everything". All we're really doing is arguing about the route to the final destination. It's not obvious to me that specialising in cross-training races should get a special bonus that specialising in cross training classes doesn't, any more than going 100 yards north then 100 yards west should lead you to a different destination or take less time than going 100 yards west then 100 yards north. I think now you are a lot closer to what I mean. Perhaps you have even hit the nail on the head... Indeed the issue I have is that going further down the different classes corridor confers higher advantages to the player, progressively, than exploring all four rooms in every stage of the corridor.
But it's only an issue for you, because you're literally the only person who thinks it confers higher advantages. Once a character is at battlecruiser 4/T2 medium guns level, then the advantages of spending the next 3M SP on training another frigate 5 + cruiser 5 + small turret 5 + med turret 5 are so much better than spending 3M SP training battleship 5 + large turret 5 that it's almost unbalanced.
I'll readily concede that it's a good idea for a brand new player to get to battlecruisers quickly, purely because they're the optimal ISK making platform if you don't have many SP. After that, I - along with literally everyone else in this thread - am 100% in favour of cross racial specialisation.
|

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 12:31:00 -
[104] - Quote
Pheusia wrote:Crellion wrote:Pheusia wrote:Let's look at this a different way: Everybody cross trains in one way or another. Some players prioritize cross training across classes - from frigate to cruiser to ballteship to capital - to gain the versatility of being able to use different ship sizes. Other players focus more on cross training across races to gain the versatility of the different racial specialities. Many do a sort of compromise, racing to battlecruisers or battleships before starting to cross train to add racial versatility. Eventually if you keep on training you'll do both kinds of cross training to their logical conclusion and be able to fly "everything". All we're really doing is arguing about the route to the final destination. It's not obvious to me that specialising in cross-training races should get a special bonus that specialising in cross training classes doesn't, any more than going 100 yards north then 100 yards west should lead you to a different destination or take less time than going 100 yards west then 100 yards north. I think now you are a lot closer to what I mean. Perhaps you have even hit the nail on the head... Indeed the issue I have is that going further down the different classes corridor confers higher advantages to the player, progressively, than exploring all four rooms in every stage of the corridor. But it's only an issue for you, because you're literally the only person who thinks it confers higher advantages. Once a character is at battlecruiser 4/T2 medium guns level, then the advantages of spending the next 3M SP on training another frigate 5 + cruiser 5 + small turret 5 + med turret 5 are so much better than spending 3M SP training battleship 5 + large turret 5 that it's almost unbalanced. I'll readily concede that it's a good idea for a brand new player to get to battlecruisers quickly, purely because they're the optimal ISK making platform if you don't have many SP. After that, I - along with literally everyone else in this thread - am 100% in favour of cross racial specialisation.
This feels like what pulling teeth out with a spoon must feel like. Look at your answer. You are disagreeing by making reference ot the 2nd race only where in the very post you quote I clearly state that the problems start with the 3rd and are exacerbated with the 4th. I even go as far as to say that the 2nd race might be better than training another class.
You know either you did not read the whole post or you are just saying "won't hear this lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalal"
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5701
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 12:36:00 -
[105] - Quote
Crellion wrote:Adding significant value does not cut it. Sure it does, since it means you do not only get what you train, but also get more for what you've already trained.
Quote:The whole discussion is comparison of the added vvalue form the one with the added value from the other. See my previous post. GǪwhich is what I responded to and what you keep on missing: you already get more for this crosstraining than for training something else. I can only venture to guess that your problem lies in your unfamiliarity of the EVE skill system and you inability to separate GÇ£moreGÇ¥ from GÇ£betterGÇ¥. Each has its own set of advantages and costs GÇö deciding between the two is what makes the system work (and be great).
Quote:Saying 4th race is useful is not enough IMO. And you're the only one thinking that this is what you get. Again: you do not just get what you train, but more for what you've already trained. You get your baseline and added value. You get something that is useful and improve the usefulness of what you already have. If this is not enough for you, nothing ever will be.
Quote:You know either you did not read the whole post or you are just saying "won't hear this lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalal" Fun fact: that's how the rest of use perceive you at this point. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 13:57:00 -
[106] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Crellion wrote:Adding significant value does not cut it. Sure it does, since it means you do not only get what you train, but also get more for what you've already trained. Crellion: It does not. Balance is not about "ok that is good to" but about "is it as good as". < Basic fact you keep missing. Quote:The whole discussion is comparison of the added vvalue form the one with the added value from the other. See my previous post. GǪwhich is what I responded to and what you keep on missing: you already get more for this crosstraining than for training something else. I can only venture to guess that your problem lies in your unfamiliarity of the EVE skill system and you inability to separate GÇ£moreGÇ¥ from GÇ£betterGÇ¥. Each has its own set of advantages and costs GÇö deciding between the two is what makes the system work (and be great). Crellion: Oh I am very familiar with the EvE skill system. Familiar enough to see the problems rather than just about familiar enough to hold on to common prejudice for dear life. Crosstraining after the 3rd race for te same ship classes offers a minimal advantage and is seriously imbalanced against the superior advantage gained for training something else at that point. Quote:Saying 4th race is useful is not enough IMO. And you're the only one thinking that this is what you get. Again: you do not just get what you train, but more for what you've already trained. You get your baseline and added value. You get something that is useful and improve the usefulness of what you already have. If this is not enough for you, nothing ever will be. Nope that: "You get something that is useful and improve the usefulness of what you already have" is what I am asking for. Currently getting a Paladin adds nothing to the usefulness of having a Kronos. Especially if you allready had Kronos and Vargur and Paladin and then trained on for a Golem you got 0 practical return...
I think in 3 or 4 years you ll see my point... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5701
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 14:44:00 -
[107] - Quote
Crellion wrote:[It does not. Balance is not about "ok that is good to" but about "is it as good as". < Basic fact you keep missing. GǪexcept, of course, that I addressed that: it's not just as good as GÇö it's better. Just because you don't agree with this doesn't mean we're missing it. It means we're rejecting your claim because it's rather silly. Cross-training always gives you more than just what you train for, by inevitable and unavoidable design.
Quote:Oh I am very familiar with the EvE skill system. Familiar enough to see the problems rather than just about familiar enough to hold on to common prejudice for dear life. Crosstraining after the 3rd race for te same ship classes offers a minimal advantage and is seriously imbalanced against the superior advantage gained for training something else at that point. Crosstraining after the 3rd race means you open up a completely different set of ships offering you a completely different set of abilities and thus increasing the usefulness of your already-trained skills. As for holding on to prejudices, it seems the only one with any of those around here are you, since you reject out of hand what people are telling you and then claim that everyone is missing the point you're making when they do, in fact, very explicitly address that point.
Quote:Nope that: "You get something that is useful and improve the usefulness of what you already have" is what I am asking for. Currently getting a Paladin adds nothing to the usefulness of having a Kronos. It adds immensely to your Marauders skill. That Kronos is appalling against laser-based (and consequently laser-weak) enemies, which the Paladin will nuke by just sneezing at. Congratulations, you now have (more than) doubled the rats you can go up aginst with high efficiency GÇö from Serp and Guristas to Serp, Guristas, Blood Raiders, Sansha and Drones.
Quote:Especially if you allready had Kronos and Vargur and Paladin and then trained on for a Golem you got 0 practical return... GǪaside from getting the Nightmare, which is death on four wheels fiftyeleven spikes and outperforms the Pally; the Vindicator, which outperforms the silly Kronos; making you completely nerf-proof as far as intra-BS balancing is concerned; on top of GǣjustGǥ getting access to two of the best Missile platforms in the game.. A whole lot more than zero.
Quote:I think in 3 or 4 years you ll see my point... Seeing as how I can already fly all four races and see the distinct advantage each additional race brought to my skill set, I doubt it. Maybe when you've done the same, you'll notice it too. So no, how about you come back in 3GÇô4 years instead? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Borun Tal
Border Zone Combat
54
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 18:42:00 -
[108] - Quote
Don't hate on cross-dressers... they're people, too...
Wait, wut? |

Bent Barrel
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 18:55:00 -
[109] - Quote
Each class (be it ship or module) has a finite amount of SP to invest into after which there's not improvement to be had via SP. Only practical application of those SP grows. Also the rule of diminishing returns holds true for more than just skill levels as you noticed.
What happens if your suggestion is implemented and you ran all the way to the end of your new rabbit hole ? |

Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 22:17:00 -
[110] - Quote
Crellion wrote: I think in 3 or 4 years you ll see my point...
I started playing in September 2006. How much longer will I need to wait before I see how much worse cross-training is?
|

Voith
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:15:00 -
[111] - Quote
Wait a minute....
People are still dumb enough not to train Winmatar?
Do you need a ******* Dev Blog that says "HEY GUYS, WE WANT EVERYONE TO FLY MINMATAR"? The last 6 odd years should have been clue enough. |

OfBalance
Caldari State
203
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 01:44:00 -
[112] - Quote
Posting to support my aviator wearing kinsmen. |

Halete
Almost Epic
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 07:07:00 -
[113] - Quote
Woah, I could've sworn OP finally acknowledged that he was wrong and that this thread could be wrapped up. Generic small-time hero-tackle pilot with no relevance. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 07:47:00 -
[114] - Quote
Halete wrote:Woah, I could've sworn OP finally acknowledged that he was wrong and that this thread could be wrapped up.
You see that's the problem exactly. We reached that point where I said if you all agree it is uneccessary I wont insist and then people take this as a carte blanche to spew more bs... Just look at Tippias post above... I have a 1 page long reply which I can not send because it will feed the troll further.
I think enough has already been posted. Most people I assume can read carefully if they have nothing better to do and see for themselves what the point is who is avoidign it and who is making arguments for arguments sake. I am waaayy out of time to keep this up. The attempt to help people come to terms with an idea that runs contrary to their cemented beliefs demands at the very least honest and to the point dialogue which I do not think I ll have a chance of here.
|

Kasha Belle
On your Left you will See Mars
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 14:39:00 -
[115] - Quote
Transracial crosstraining.??
This is chicks with dicks right??? |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
888
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 01:00:00 -
[116] - Quote
Crellion wrote:Halete wrote:Woah, I could've sworn OP finally acknowledged that he was wrong and that this thread could be wrapped up. You see that's the problem exactly. We reached that point where I said if you all agree it is uneccessary I wont insist and then people take this as a carte blanche to spew more bs... Just look at Tippias post above... I have a 1 page long reply which I can not send because it will feed the troll further. I think enough has already been posted. Most people I assume can read carefully if they have nothing better to do and see for themselves what the point is who is avoidign it and who is making arguments for arguments sake. I am waaayy out of time to keep this up. The attempt to help people come to terms with an idea that runs contrary to their cemented beliefs demands at the very least honest and to the point dialogue which I do not think I ll have a chance of here.
The problem is that you refuse by all means, including ridiculous arguments and tounts, what people are addressing since the beginning of your post.
Now, I'm starting to think that you're either a tremendous troll making fun of everyone or just idiot. How can you possibly not, or refuse to understand that having the 4 fracking races trained is already a huge benefit on it self since there you will always have the best ship for no mater the situation?
What about Bhaalgorns, Vindicators, Machariels, Nightmares punting aside the awesome cruiser and frigate pirate ships lines, isn't this a huge benefit on it self for you knowing the number of guys able to do so? |

Halete
Almost Epic
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 08:21:00 -
[117] - Quote
Regarding the previous post,
Considering he is referring to us all as being so 'cemented' in our ways in a derogatory fashion and is completely unironic, I would say tremendous troll. Generic small-time hero-tackle pilot with no relevance. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 08:24:00 -
[118] - Quote
Halete wrote:Regarding the previous post,
Considering he is referring to us all as being so 'cemented' in our ways in a derogatory fashion and is completely unironic, I would say tremendous troll.
Pardon me but I think you mean idiot.
|

Halete
Almost Epic
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 08:29:00 -
[119] - Quote
Tremendous idiot works fine, too. Generic small-time hero-tackle pilot with no relevance. |

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 08:36:00 -
[120] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:
The problem is that you refuse by all means, including ridiculous arguments and tounts, what people are addressing since the beginning of your post.
Now, I'm starting to think that you're either a tremendous troll making fun of everyone or just idiot. How can you possibly not, or refuse to understand that having the 4 fracking races trained is already a huge benefit on it self since there you will always have the best ship for no mater the situation?
What about Bhaalgorns, Vindicators, Machariels, Nightmares punting aside the awesome cruiser and frigate pirate ships lines, isn't this a huge benefit on it self for you knowing the number of guys able to do so?
Thnak you for your opinion.
I have never refused that flying 4 races is a benefit. I have disputed that it is a big a benefit as training for an additional class.
To understand my argument you have to step back. If you are so close to the wall that you only see shades of racial training (guys with 1 race, others with 2, others with 3 and others with 4 for example) it is readily obvious to you that those with all for races have a very big advantage which you choose to call a "huge benefit"
Now take a step backwards. You ll find they all have the same SPs (in my argument) and that the one can fly: - Set 1 Deimos, Ishtar, Vaga, Munnin, Zealot, Sacriledge, Hugin, Rapier, Arazu, Curse, Pilgrim and the other can fly: - Set 2 Deimos, Ishtar, Vaga, Munnin, Zealot, Sacriledge, Cerberus and Eagle.
You have said that set 2 has a "huge benefit". How does your declaration look to you now?
Or perhaps the example is not extremely fair because the SPs for reckons 4 + cloak 4 might* be more than Caldari cruiser 5 (can't rememer). Substitute then the reckons in Set 1 with Geddon, Apoc, Abbadon... the scales are still tipped the same way...
Do not be so rush to judge anything if you are not taking in the whole picture.
Still as I said before I have stoped arguing about this and accepted it is not feasible to sway people, however posts like yours are too sentimentally charged not to reply to 
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |