| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Xeronn
Amarr Ordo Drakonis Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:15:00 -
[451]
Originally by: van Uber
Originally by: wah bok let me get this clear.
CCP make it so suicide ganking has actual consequences and therefore they kill pvp ? What a F... up way at looking at things
Second. they say the want to change the wardecking system so there will be some goals to it instead of it being just a way so it can be used to grief other players. wow how dare they. 
This...
It's amusing to see how some individuals criticize the Wardec system and at the same time manage to cringe at any change that CCP mentions. I guess that is what happens when someone draws a conclusion from the first meaning in an entire paragraph. If one bothers to read further they state:
Quote: ...and that CCP is interested in making war declarations deeper by adding mechanics such as victory conditions that would eventually end wars.
Depth and goals... How dare they?!
you don`t get it do you? EvE is (was?) about players seting there own goals and finding ways to achieve them and NOT about NPC-directed goals, quests, whatever . Why a mechanic forcing "goals" on wardecs? A war ends when one side is dead or the Agressor stops the Agression. No way around it .
|

Zeknichov
Realm Industries
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:17:00 -
[452]
As soon as they made it an exploit to avoid concord it was evident CCP had no intention of having Empire anything but a pseudo safezone.
|

Ruze
Amarr No Applicable Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:18:00 -
[453]
Edited by: Ruze on 03/09/2008 15:19:15
Originally by: Zeknichov As soon as they made it an exploit to avoid concord it was evident CCP had no intention of having Empire anything but a pseudo safezone.
Very true.
Before, it was just a crime to avoid or fight CONCORD. Then CCP made it an exploit. The difference is subtle, but it was a clear step away from a sandbox style of gameplay, and towards the 'open ended' style we have now.
Personally, I think it was a step in the wrong direction.
Ruze Ashkor'Murkon Security File |

Roy Batty68
Caldari Immortal Dead
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:21:00 -
[454]
Originally by: Zeknichov As soon as they made it an exploit to avoid concord it was evident CCP had no intention of having Empire anything but a pseudo safezone.
True. Now it's just a tug-of-war match to see just how safe it should be.
And even that isn't exactly true. More like a bunch of us geeks rabble-rabble back and forth at each other while CCP rolls their eyes at us and do whatever they were/are planning to do anyway.

Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Malcanis
RuffRyders Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:22:00 -
[455]
Originally by: Jarvis Hellstrom As in so many things, looking at this from an RP/"Ingame" perspective clears up so much.
+++Scene - Yulai Council room - it's newly refit but some parts of it were clearly part of the old Concord station. The scorch marks are still there. A reminder.+++
Concord Commissioner (Tiredly): "Okay, next on the agenda please?"
Secretary: "We have a rep from the Jita Mercantile Guild here, Commissioner."
Commish: "Okay - show him in."
The rep comes in, a haggard balding guy with a paunch, a big plastic box and a couple of flow charts on 4x4 sheets. He looks tired and a bit ****ed.
Commish: "NOW what is it Wallace?"
Rep (dumping the box's contents on the Commish's desk so that the hundreds of datachits overflow it and fall to the blackened carpet): "New complaints and reports for you Commissioner. In the last month 6400 various haulers and transports destroyed in Jita system alone. Total loss to the economy (he sticks up one of the flowcharts) 12%. Hauling is going down and everything's being devalued as the pirates are selling their wares for half price. Manufacturers and miners are screaming and threatening a general strike."
Commish: "But we're destroying them!"
Rep: "Yes, sir. You are. And here's your cost of the ammunition and material used. Oh, and here's the statement from the Concord subsidized insurance company on the payouts for all the ships you're blowing up."
Commish: "Okay - I know I'm new here since the last guy got blown up with the station but isn't this stupid? We're paying out insurance to people we're blowing up? AND they're making off with the cargos after we blow them up?"
Rep: "Yep."
Commish: "Okay - so they're making all kinds of money while we pay them to get blown up. But they're outlaws? Why aren't we shooting them before they get to the haulers?"
Rep: "Oh, they're not outlaws sir. Rep is in good standing even for the worst repeat offenders. They just go and blow up pirates and send the reports to Concord and get the sec upgrades. Then come back and do the same thing again."
Commish: "WHAT? Get the council in here NOW. We're re-writing this mess so fast their heads will spin!"
Secretary: "There's one more person to see before the Council arrives, sir. Should I send him away?"
Commish (Checking the clock): "Nah, send him in. My day is ruined anyway."
A nervous young Concord clerk comes in also with a big box but this one is full of flimsy forms.
Commish: "What have you got, son and make it quick!"
Clerk: "Yes sir, sorry sir. The previous Commissioner asked me to collect forms for Concord approved War Declarations and summarize their reasons listed on the forms."
Commish: "Okay, sure. Whatcha got?"
Clerk: "Well sir, the break out is as follows in no particular order: 1) Declaration to remove competion from a system; 2%
2) Revenge/Vengeance for previous war/action 7% 3) Proving how l33t we are! 11% 4) Just for lulz; 30% 5) I wanted their crap 35% 6) Blackmail for money 15%
Commish: "Wait a sec - hang on. HALF the war declarations we're approving are for PIRACY and BLACKMAIL?"
Clerk: "Umm - yessir."
Commish: "And most of the rest are for - what - psychopathic killing for giggles?"
Clerk (sheepish) "Yessir."
Commish: "Why are we approving these? We're the bloody COPS aren't we?"
Clerk: "Well, the policy is we approve every declaration. The reasons don't matter. They're just for record keeping. Lots of folks don't even fill out that part of the form."
Commish (Losing it): "GET THE COUNCIL IN HERE NOW!"
CONCORD don't pay the insurance, you moop.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |

Ruze
Amarr No Applicable Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:22:00 -
[456]
Originally by: Roy Batty68
Originally by: Zeknichov As soon as they made it an exploit to avoid concord it was evident CCP had no intention of having Empire anything but a pseudo safezone.
True. Now it's just a tug-of-war match to see just how safe it should be.
And even that isn't exactly true. More like a bunch of us geeks rabble-rabble back and forth at each other while CCP rolls their eyes at us and do whatever they were/are planning to do anyway.

Hahahahah ...
Alas, that's the way it should be. I just wish I was the one making the decisions, is all 
Ruze Ashkor'Murkon Security File |

Malcanis
RuffRyders Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:23:00 -
[457]
Originally by: Kyle Klanen
Originally by: Malcanis Well said. CCP have made their decision regarding hi-sec. That decision is not up for debate any more: it's a done deal. Greyscale has madewhat was obvious before extremely clear now.
Kind of sucks for the professions of suicide ganker and empire merc, but there we have it. The hay is in the barn.
True the discussion now is fairly moot, but it wont end there other stuff will be slowly changed or removed like gate camping or perhaps even some kind of npc protection in low sec or reduced death penalty and the slow shift towards catering to risk adverse players will continue.
Yes I know. That's why I want a shitload more 0.0 space - I mean a lot more. Space far enough away that I can actually play EvE.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |

Irida Mershkov
Gallente Trader's Academy Blue Sky Consortium
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:36:00 -
[458]
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: Kyle Klanen
Originally by: Malcanis Well said. CCP have made their decision regarding hi-sec. That decision is not up for debate any more: it's a done deal. Greyscale has madewhat was obvious before extremely clear now.
Kind of sucks for the professions of suicide ganker and empire merc, but there we have it. The hay is in the barn.
True the discussion now is fairly moot, but it wont end there other stuff will be slowly changed or removed like gate camping or perhaps even some kind of npc protection in low sec or reduced death penalty and the slow shift towards catering to risk adverse players will continue.
Yes I know. That's why I want a shitload more 0.0 space - I mean a lot more. Space far enough away that I can actually play EvE.
What about turning previous low-sec into 0.0 and turning, say, 40% of empire space into low-sec, cluster the high-sec guys together. Would be interesting. Give it some RP reason like all the pirate factions smack the Empires or something.
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:41:00 -
[459]
Originally by: Irida Mershkov
What about turning previous low-sec into 0.0 and turning, say, 40% of empire space into low-sec, cluster the high-sec guys together. Would be interesting. Give it some RP reason like all the pirate factions smack the Empires or something.
I'd say, turn 50% of existing high sec into low sec. Add 10-20 more 0.0 regions, about 25% of them of NPC sov. Detach high sec markets from all other markets. That includes contracts. Make high sec markets only applicable to high sec resources, and make everything else only sellable and buyable on low sec or 0.0 markets.
In essence, shard the game completely. It's already half way there. In order for low sec and 0.0 players to be able to compete with high sec dwellers without using high sec alts, the sharding must be thourough.
Filiolus of Bellum is recruiting
|

Ruze
Amarr No Applicable Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:46:00 -
[460]
Step 1: Make CONCORD exist in all Empire, hisec and losec. Scale the reaction time in .4 and below, just as it's scaled in hisec. Contested space will have no CONCORD presence, of course. (This makes the 'safe space' approximately 34% of the universe)
-or-
Step 1: Double the size and density of hisec space.
Step 2: Double the size of deep space. Many more nulsec regions, with far broader reaches.
Essentially, make it so that if you want PvP, you go to one of the contested systems, or nulsec. Losec still has crime, but is balanced to be far safer than it currently is.
Ruze Ashkor'Murkon Security File |

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:49:00 -
[461]
Originally by: Ruze Step 1: Make CONCORD exist in all Empire, hisec and losec. Scale the reaction time in .4 and below, just as it's scaled in hisec. Contested space will have no CONCORD presence, of course. (This makes the 'safe space' approximately 34% of the universe)
-or-
Step 1: Double the size and density of hisec space.
Step 2: Double the size of deep space. Many more nulsec regions, with far broader reaches.
Essentially, make it so that if you want PvP, you go to one of the contested systems, or nulsec. Losec still has crime, but is balanced to be far safer than it currently is.
That's where Eve is headed, alright. That's not what most of us want, though. Therefore I think a sharding of the server is the only way. It will keep the game alive until after WoD goes gold, thus guaranteeing CCP's capital for that, and after that, who cares about Eve, right?
Filiolus of Bellum is recruiting
|

Ruze
Amarr No Applicable Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 15:57:00 -
[462]
Originally by: Ki An
That's where Eve is headed, alright. That's not what most of us want, though. Therefore I think a sharding of the server is the only way. It will keep the game alive until after WoD goes gold, thus guaranteeing CCP's capital for that, and after that, who cares about Eve, right?
If they shard, I want just one thing: Completely copy the server over, with all player skills and financial gains.
Cause I'll tell you right now, if you make a new 'start', the old server will die. What new player in their right mind would willingly compete with players who have loyally payed for the game for 5+ years, when they could compete with those their own age.
And if you kill any chance of new players joining the old server, you are just betraying those who have invested years of time and effort.
Complete copies is the only way to work it. That way, those players who have been around for years, can still carry on and keep playing.
Ruze Ashkor'Murkon Security File |

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:03:00 -
[463]
Originally by: Ruze
Originally by: Ki An
That's where Eve is headed, alright. That's not what most of us want, though. Therefore I think a sharding of the server is the only way. It will keep the game alive until after WoD goes gold, thus guaranteeing CCP's capital for that, and after that, who cares about Eve, right?
If they shard, I want just one thing: Completely copy the server over, with all player skills and financial gains.
Cause I'll tell you right now, if you make a new 'start', the old server will die. What new player in their right mind would willingly compete with players who have loyally payed for the game for 5+ years, when they could compete with those their own age.
And if you kill any chance of new players joining the old server, you are just betraying those who have invested years of time and effort.
Complete copies is the only way to work it. That way, those players who have been around for years, can still carry on and keep playing.
Sure, let them join with their old characters or make new ones. We need to shard, though, because otherwise Eve will be destroyed.
Filiolus of Bellum is recruiting
|

Roy Batty68
Caldari Immortal Dead
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:04:00 -
[464]
Dude, this thread is getting stupid even by my standards... Now you're seriously talking about sharding?
You guys are really losing it.
Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Ruze
Amarr No Applicable Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:07:00 -
[465]
Originally by: Roy Batty68 Dude, this thread is getting stupid even by my standards... Now you're seriously talking about sharding?
You guys are really losing it.
Hey, I'm just having fun.
We could be talking about cannibalism, and I'd still put my two cents in. Actually, that's not a fair relation, because I support cannibalism, but you get my drift ...
Ruze Ashkor'Murkon Security File |

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:10:00 -
[466]
Originally by: Roy Batty68 Dude, this thread is getting stupid even by my standards... Now you're seriously talking about sharding?
You guys are really losing it.
We're simply extrapolating on the changes CCP have already decided upon. It's clear that high sec is soon going to be completely safe. I don't want to play in a game with battle grounds. My bet is that many agrees with me. Therefore, when CCP implements safe high sec, the game will die, unless they shard it. Then it has a chance of surviving for six months, thus freeing up capital for the WoD project. Eve still dies, but it takes a bit longer.
Filiolus of Bellum is recruiting
|

Ruze
Amarr No Applicable Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:12:00 -
[467]
Originally by: Ki An
Originally by: Roy Batty68 Dude, this thread is getting stupid even by my standards... Now you're seriously talking about sharding?
You guys are really losing it.
We're simply extrapolating on the changes CCP have already decided upon. It's clear that high sec is soon going to be completely safe. I don't want to play in a game with battle grounds. My bet is that many agrees with me. Therefore, when CCP implements safe high sec, the game will die, unless they shard it. Then it has a chance of surviving for six months, thus freeing up capital for the WoD project. Eve still dies, but it takes a bit longer.
Seriously, battlegrounds are already in game. It's not that big an issue, they put them in place months ago. Riskless PvP with no hard effect on anything, where anybody can equip a ship and blow something up. EvE and WoW both have battlegrounds, and it's old news. Sadly, it kinda works in EvE 
Ruze Ashkor'Murkon Security File |

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:13:00 -
[468]
Originally by: Ruze Seriously, battlegrounds are already in game. It's not that big an issue, they put them in place months ago. Riskless PvP with no hard effect on anything, where anybody can equip a ship and blow something up. EvE and WoW both have battlegrounds, and it's old news. Sadly, it kinda works in EvE 
True, but soon battle grounds will be all we have. There's still some meaningful PvP in the game. It's headed for the abyss, though.
Filiolus of Bellum is recruiting
|

Spoon Thumb
Paladin Imperium Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:14:00 -
[469]
Having not read the other 17 pages of replies,
I've considered this idea before. It'd fit a lot closer with what people's preconceptions are of any game. What other game can you be blown up in straight away after you start?
If you told newbies the truth, "that you're at risk soon as you undock" they would never undock and no one would play the game.
However, such a change would require a major rethink about the way security works in Eve:
For example, if you made the 100% safe newbie island and then had the rest of Eve as low sec, the pace of the game would be much slower, you'd have to make it much easier for people to move around and avoid gatecamps.
You'd have to disincentive people from going back to the newbie zone (maybe even ban them from returning).
There would also have to be a lot more tools to help casual players and help anti-pirates, or those who want to increase security (stuff like being able to take control of gate guns or become official local militias / police enforcers, market controls / embargo's etc, lots of the sorts of things that 0.0 players have to defend their own space and make it secure would have to be transported to low sec).
I think though, what wkould happen is the happy gank crowd wouldn't like it because atm the emphasis is on a very hands off approach by concord, where security is in the hands of the players and the mechanics are on the pirates side. If there were no secuirty and pvp zone almost anywhere, it'd have to be the other way round
_______ People like that don't have friends just temporary common interests.
|

Malcanis
RuffRyders Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:17:00 -
[470]
Originally by: Ruze
Originally by: Roy Batty68 Dude, this thread is getting stupid even by my standards... Now you're seriously talking about sharding?
You guys are really losing it.
Hey, I'm just having fun.
We could be talking about cannibalism, and I'd still put my two cents in. Actually, that's not a fair relation, because I support cannibalism, but you get my drift ...
I can't be the only one to think that Hannibal Lector was vulgar to drink Chianti with liver.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |

Malcanis
RuffRyders Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:18:00 -
[471]
Originally by: Spoon Thumb
Having not read the other 17 pages of replies,
I've considered this idea before. It'd fit a lot closer with what people's preconceptions are of any game. What other game can you be blown up in straight away after you start?
If you told newbies the truth, "that you're at risk soon as you undock" they would never undock and no one would play the game.
So did you join the game under false pretences?
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |

Syringe
Morphine Inc
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:35:00 -
[472]
Lemme just turn on my PvP flag here. Click "yes" if you want to accept my duel request. --------- War isn't the answer. However, the objective isn't to provide answers rather than eliminate the question. |

van Uber
Swedish Aerospace Inc Un-Natural Selection
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:40:00 -
[473]
Edited by: van Uber on 03/09/2008 16:42:08
Originally by: Xeronn
you don`t get it do you? EvE is (was?) about players seting there own goals and finding ways to achieve them and NOT about NPC-directed goals, quests, whatever . Why a mechanic forcing "goals" on wardecs? A war ends when one side is dead or the Aggressor stops the Aggression. No way around it .
Who ever said that goals in a future war declaring mechanic had to be static? You know, it could be stated/created/chosen by the aggressor. But that is speculation of something that is not even on the horizon yet (as in details of a future war-dec mechanic).
Are you seriously telling me that every single war ever fought has ended with total annihilation? Not really, since you mention an alternative, the aggression stops. Now, I'm curious, why would the Aggressor stop the Aggression? Could it be that he has fulfilled all his objectives?
|

Ruze
Amarr No Applicable Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:40:00 -
[474]
Originally by: Syringe Lemme just turn on my PvP flag here. Click "yes" if you want to accept my duel request.
Anyone else ever notice that when you have a game with 'consensual' PvP, the only people who want to fight you are three levels or more higher than your character?
Originally by: CCP Greyscale consciously deciding not to join a corp is pretty much deciding that you don't want to have fun
|

Kelli Flay
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 16:55:00 -
[475]
Originally by: Ki An
Originally by: Ruze Step 1: Make CONCORD exist in all Empire, hisec and losec. Scale the reaction time in .4 and below, just as it's scaled in hisec. Contested space will have no CONCORD presence, of course. (This makes the 'safe space' approximately 34% of the universe)
-or-
Step 1: Double the size and density of hisec space.
Step 2: Double the size of deep space. Many more nulsec regions, with far broader reaches.
Essentially, make it so that if you want PvP, you go to one of the contested systems, or nulsec. Losec still has crime, but is balanced to be far safer than it currently is.
That's where Eve is headed, alright. That's not what most of us want, though. Therefore I think a sharding of the server is the only way. It will keep the game alive until after WoD goes gold, thus guaranteeing CCP's capital for that, and after that, who cares about Eve, right?
I m bookmarking this thread for future reading for when i am having a bad day or for when my cat craps on the carpet and I have to clean it up.
No matter who bad life gets, I will always have this thread to read to cheer me up.
"The National Weather Bureau is forecasting a thunderstorm of failure." |

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 17:04:00 -
[476]
Originally by: Kelli Flay I m bookmarking this thread for future reading for when i am having a bad day or for when my cat craps on the carpet and I have to clean it up.
No matter who bad life gets, I will always have this thread to read to cheer me up.
Because of your passive aggressive carebear nature, the only time you can truly have fun is when someone else isn't? Doesn't that make you a griefer?
Filiolus of Bellum is recruiting
|

Ruze
Amarr No Applicable Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 17:06:00 -
[477]
When my life gets bad I just go for a walk, smoke a cigarette, or hang out with my wife for a bit (I can mix walking and cigarettes, or walking and wife, but not cigarettes and wife, as she hates the smell).
Originally by: CCP Greyscale consciously deciding not to join a corp is pretty much deciding that you don't want to have fun
|

Kelli Flay
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 17:15:00 -
[478]
Originally by: Ki An
Originally by: Kelli Flay I m bookmarking this thread for future reading for when i am having a bad day or for when my cat craps on the carpet and I have to clean it up.
No matter who bad life gets, I will always have this thread to read to cheer me up.
Because of your passive aggressive carebear nature, the only time you can truly have fun is when someone else isn't? Doesn't that make you a griefer?
{lays on couch} Yes because of my passive aggressive nature and my childhood. I think it goes back to when I was four and my mom took me to the circus. There were elephants and clowns............
"The National Weather Bureau is forecasting a thunderstorm of failure." |

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 17:17:00 -
[479]
Originally by: Kelli Flay
{lays on couch} Yes because of my passive aggressive nature and my childhood. I think it goes back to when I was four and my mom took me to the circus. There were elephants and clowns............
You griefer you. Can only have fun at someone else's expense.
Filiolus of Bellum is recruiting
|

Jarvis Hellstrom
Gallente The Flying Tigers United Front Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 17:42:00 -
[480]
Originally by: Malcanis CONCORD don't pay the insurance, you moop.
Don't be a jerk just because you can't respond to the argument.
If you would like the detail behind that comment (and this is opinion but so far as I know it's never been discussed anywhere in canon so it's as valid as any other) here's my take on it:
The insurance system of EVE cannot be an independent company. There are two reasons for this. They would go entirely out of business at lightspeed as we all know how often players renew their insurance as opposed to collect it. The second reason is that if you lose an uninsured ship, there's still a payout. No regular company does such things. If your house or car is uninsured and gets destroyed, do you suddenly get a cheque from some insurance company? Of course not! But if you lose a ship in EVE and you've bought no insurance your wallet will still get a nice little pump (my last payout for that was a little over a million ISK).
So - if the insurance 'company' isn't a purely private vehicle, which it cannot be based on the above, then it is either a private venture both subsidized by the government and subject to regulations from it, or run by the government as some kind of Empire Corporation (rather like Commonwealth Crown Corporations).
So, either way the government is paying for it. Since it seems to be the same insurance company whether you are in Amaar, Matari, Federation, Caldari or Null Sec space, it makes the most sense to relate it to the only other organization that can be found in most of those places - that being Concord.
So, next time, try engaging your brain before your mouth.
May God stand between you and harm in all the Empty places you must walk
(Old Egyptian Blessing) |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |