| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. WTS 30 Day GTC 150Mill each. watching forums now!!! 25 to sell(sucure) - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
send one to foebk please. thanks
- by Matiaj - at 2008.03.05 18:06:00
|
2. I am bored of the battlecruiser nerf debate... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I can't get anywhere near your numbers without using implants. Care to share your setup?
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.12 18:50:00
|
3. I am bored of the battlecruiser nerf debate... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 12/11/2007 18:44:48 Originally by: Pottsey With a web, microwarp, 2 damage mods I have over 23k hitpoints (without resistance) and 110 HP regen. How is that a carp tank? The hitpoints alone keep you alive with res...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.12 18:37:00
|
4. LSEs aren't the problem, it's the SPRs - shield tanking with lowslots. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 12/11/2007 18:05:21 Originally by: Pottsey 8 railguns T2, 425mm Invul field, 3 extenders Web 2 damage mods, 4 PDS. If it was for PvP I would take out 1 extender and add 1 microwarp. This setup, with 1 less ext...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.12 18:01:00
|
5. I am bored of the battlecruiser nerf debate... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 12/11/2007 17:06:47 Originally by: Pottsey Your wrong. 3 damage mods and room for propulsion. No tackle as its not needed as my gang mate would do it.Why would it do crap DPS with 8 of the largest weapons and 3 da...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.12 17:04:00
|
6. LSEs aren't the problem, it's the SPRs - shield tanking with lowslots. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Pottsey Why not? All my PvP setups have MWD. If you truly did what you said you would and ignored my passive tank you would die pretty fast. By the time you realise it would be to late. Your damps would be useless and so wou...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.12 15:34:00
|
7. I am bored of the battlecruiser nerf debate... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 12/11/2007 15:35:46 Originally by: Pottsey Look at my hyper setup thread. Better tank, more range, better damage then the dual amour rep active tank. Passive tanks can do other stuff at the same time. ThatĘs a stu...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.12 15:24:00
|
8. LSEs aren't the problem, it's the SPRs - shield tanking with lowslots. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 12/11/2007 12:43:32 You ruined my efforts to deviate the nerf requests towards SPRs instead of LSEs. :/
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.12 12:40:00
|
9. LSEs aren't the problem, it's the SPRs - shield tanking with lowslots. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 12/11/2007 11:11:13 LSEs are fine. The problem lies in SPRs because they allow ships to shield tank with both med and low slots. Oh wait, this means the ship actually cannot do anything else. NEVERMIND IT'S CLEARLY IMB...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.12 11:05:00
|
10. More nerf for the drake please - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 11/11/2007 19:45:13 Originally by: Bentula But if you want to tell me that it makes sense for a passive tanked BC to tank better than a passive tanked BS, that sacrifices just as much, makes somehow sense i disagre...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.11 19:41:00
|
11. More nerf for the drake please - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 11/11/2007 19:26:25 Originally by: joshmorris it can tank to where it will slowly take out oppontents ( I know it cant tackle but if it has friends like the 3-5 people trying to break its tank it pwns) Why are t...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.11 19:23:00
|
12. Passive tank Drake for 0.0 - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Valerax Orion Also with that setup you don't need to worry about cap at all. You're using missiles which take 0 cap, and a passive shield tank which by the very nature of it...takes no cap It does use cap. Unless you're f...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.11 18:09:00
|
13. More nerf for the drake please - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 11/11/2007 03:01:30 Replacing the 5% shield resist by a 5% damage or rof bonus would make HAM drakes stupidly overpowered. Hitting up to 15km+ without penalty and being able to switch to javelin ammo for even more range ar...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.11 02:58:00
|
14. Nighthawks lack of dps - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 04/11/2007 14:36:00 Originally by: Andrue But not for PvE purposes! If you want to do PvP find a different command ship. All the others are good at PvP and okay for PvE. You leave the one dedicated PvE ship alone....
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.04 14:28:00
|
15. Nighthawks lack of dps - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 04/11/2007 03:15:10 Originally by: Fehnrail You leave my lowslots alone. No, I won't. The 5 lowslots are only good atm because it allows the NH to easily fit a RCU.
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.04 03:15:00
|
16. Nighthawks lack of dps - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
The NH doesn't need more DPS. What the NH needs is a powergrid buff and a 7/6/4 slot layout.
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.04 02:53:00
|
17. New torps - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
New torps are incredibly powerful. 25+ km range is perfect for remote repping other bs with these 2 remaining high slots while not worrying much about your placement. Put some damps (and eventually 1 painter) in the meds with a light buffer armor ...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.11.01 11:48:00
|
18. Save the torpedoes! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 26/10/2007 02:40:32 Wow. I'm so glad CCP doesn't listen to people like the OP.
- by Matiaj - at 2007.10.26 02:36:00
|
19. Nighthawk dps vs other Commands - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 21/10/2007 18:52:16 Originally by: Goumindong Or you could just reduce HAM fittings like needs to be done. Yep, I talked about that it in my post actually. But I don't think it would be enough in the case of th...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.10.21 18:49:00
|
20. Nighthawk dps vs other Commands - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Matiaj on 21/10/2007 16:05:32 The NH doesn't need more DPS imo. The NH's problem is that it needs both a RCU and an ACR to fit ham + mwd + inj + large shield booster. The other command ships do not have this problem. - Astarte : ...
- by Matiaj - at 2007.10.21 16:02:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |