| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
21. Sticky:[Rhea] Introducing the Bowhead - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Would it be unrealistic to hope for a T2 jump freighter version in the future?, would be awesome for solo people outside hi-sec.
- by dexington - at 2014.11.10 11:59:07
|
22. Aspiring logistic pilot looking for low sec or npc null corporation - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Still looking...
- by dexington - at 2014.10.26 10:06:44
|
23. Aspiring logistic pilot looking for low sec or npc null corporation - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Still looking...
- by dexington - at 2014.10.25 11:33:45
|
24. Aspiring logistic pilot looking for low sec or npc null corporation - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Still looking...
- by dexington - at 2014.10.24 20:54:30
|
25. Aspiring logistic pilot looking for low sec or npc null corporation - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
I want to fly logistic, so i'm looking for a corp in need of a logi pilot. I have no experience flying logi, but i have all skills need for flying both shield and armor logi, and can fly all 4 racial logi cruisers. I'm looking for a corp that pr...
- by dexington - at 2014.10.24 14:15:52
|
26. S.O.E. as pirate faction? <-- The HORROR - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Airdorn wrote: It hurts me to my heart that CCP categorizes SOE as a 'pirate faction'. This altruistic bunch deserve so much more. That is all. Maybe you should read the lore/chronicles, there are some pretty strong indications of soe hav...
- by dexington - at 2014.10.23 10:49:10
|
27. Sooo quafe mega? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I really don't understand what the problem is, get the emails from twitch and mail the codes yourself, it should not be that hard.... I'll not pay for a similar product...
- by dexington - at 2014.10.23 08:32:04
|
28. Hobojamming Fix [Dictors] - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
and ccp while you are fixing the problem, please ban the PL pilots who started this trend...
- by dexington - at 2014.09.29 07:56:00
|
29. Prototype: Dojos - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
mynnna wrote: If you don't like other people having structured fights, you can go inject a little bit of unstructuredness into their day by blowing up their dojo. e: If structured fights have no place on TQ, do y'all folks also oppose the All...
- by dexington - at 2014.09.25 13:35:00
|
30. Prototype: Dojos - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Two step wrote: Where is this magic new requirement that you must be able to screw up what people want to do on their own time coming from? Do you also think ccp would add instanced pve missions and mining belts where people could be left al...
- by dexington - at 2014.09.25 12:27:00
|
31. Prototype: Dojos - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mangala Solaris wrote: This would reinvigorate the 1v1, make them an actual thing again, beyond us needing to continually hammer home rules/or setup special channels on how 1v1s should be handled. It will probably kill 1v1, and in worst case...
- by dexington - at 2014.09.25 12:02:00
|
32. Prototype: Dojos - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Veritas wrote: Have you ever wanted a little pewpew but didnGÇÖt have the time to find a fight, or even fit a ship? is this really the crowd you think should be rewarded?, do you really think sugar coated bullshit pvp is going to add any...
- by dexington - at 2014.09.25 11:08:00
|
33. Sticky:Language Chat Channel Consolidation With Oceanus - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
great.. one of the few places where chat didn't drown in cyrillic bullshit is now gone, because ccp support has a hard time figuring out how to use google translate... but it explains why you can write the most obscene insults in russian without g...
- by dexington - at 2014.09.23 20:59:00
|
34. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
KayleInara wrote: Mark Munoz wrote: That sucks obviously because it is very common practice to have advertising and sponsorship deals on the web and in applications, but if that's the case then pay your writers real cash, or hope they like t...
- by dexington - at 2014.08.21 18:02:00
|
35. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hendrick Tallardar wrote: dexington wrote: Hendrick Tallardar wrote: Except that in the case of Zkillboard, Dotlan, CZ, TMC etc. there is no in-game reward for using their referral links. They aren't providing any incentive other than "he...
- by dexington - at 2014.08.20 20:42:00
|
36. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hendrick Tallardar wrote: Except that in the case of Zkillboard, Dotlan, CZ, TMC etc. there is no in-game reward for using their referral links. They aren't providing any incentive other than "help us keep this running and that's all we ask." ...
- by dexington - at 2014.08.20 20:24:00
|
37. Announcement:Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: dexington wrote: The images are linked from external sites, i hope they never enable that feature for monkey class users, but i guess it would be fun to datamine ip/browser info and try and match it to users to detects alts and...
- by dexington - at 2014.08.20 17:34:00
|
38. Announcement:Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Doc Fury wrote: Andski wrote: Man you've really been showcasing mod abilities in this thread: endless quotes per post, images, oh boy It's almost as if there is real forum software buried under here. They just haven't unchecked the [Suc...
- by dexington - at 2014.08.20 17:10:00
|
39. So many to go inactive - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sibyyl wrote: ^^Content is added by you, not by CCP. CCP provides tools for making content. CCP should remove missions, incursions, exploring and factional warfare and then we'll see how many players are left to create any content.
- by dexington - at 2014.07.15 16:08:00
|
40. So many to go inactive - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sodabro wrote: ITT: bittervets crying about how the game used to be "better". There is nothing new left to do in the game, and the new stuff ccp is adding in the "expansions" is garbage, how much more useless deployable junk needs to be adde...
- by dexington - at 2014.07.15 15:33:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |