| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time. |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
I want 150 million SP too! |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1806
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time.
This thread should go places. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
321
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time.
CCP has a long history of refunding SP after changes to mechanics. Shouldn't be a problem.
Any day now you should be getting your SP refund and a personalized apology from the CEO. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:a personalized apology from the CEO.
we actually got one of those it just took ppl leaving the game... Which should teach ppl, if you want anything done, quit in droves
http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2317/JKES0811.17.1 Bees That Drink Human Tears -- ITS SCIENCE!!! |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time. CCP has a long history of refunding SP after changes to mechanics. Shouldn't be a problem. Any day now you should be getting your SP refund and a personalized apology from the CEO.
I doubt it. There hasn't been anything mentioned in a Dev blog about it at all. This is total nonsense. After spending the time to train characters up to be specialized in a certain area CCP has the audacity to to this!!! I mean come on....
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6457
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Humour. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
321
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:03:00 -
[8] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I doubt it. There hasn't been anything mentioned in a Dev blog about it at all. This is total nonsense. After spending the time to train characters up to be specialized in a certain area CCP has the audacity to to this!!! I mean come on....
Hmmmm, that's unusual. Someone must have forgot to include it in the latest devblog.
It's ok, usually in these situations they double your refunded SP and the CEO sends you a home made pie made from a medley of the finest fruits and berries Iceland has to offer. |

sneekyninja
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
OP: |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP really needs to address this issue ASAP. With upcoming changes to FW and datacores that is going to wipe out another useful avenue of revenue I had. IF they keep this up I am going to be ruined. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
502
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:17:00 -
[11] - Quote
My, my, aren't you self-entitled. Even after the market change my ranks in Corporate Contracting continued to be used to their fullest. Now that I don't have to worry about the odd faction item clogging it up I'm able to list ever greater numbers of freshly built and equipped Blackbirds and Scorpions for my alliance mates to use against whatever alliance we're destroying this week.
Perhaps you should expand your markets instead of refusing to adapt to changing conditions. |

Greyscale Dash
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:17:00 -
[12] - Quote
I thought when you spent lots of resources in something there was always the risk of that something getting changed. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
Greyscale Dash wrote:I thought when you spent lots of resources in something there was always the risk of that something getting changed.
I do not understand at all why more people don't complain about htis sort of thing. Titans are a good example you spend good isk and more importantly time to just have CCP nerf what ever you do. If they are going to institute major changes then players should be given the option of having the sp returned. Fair is fair.
As an aside, very poor customer service in having to be told to offer this in the first place. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
502
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:21:00 -
[14] - Quote
Accurate picture of the OP: http://i.imgur.com/Cv3AK.jpg |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
502
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:22:00 -
[15] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Greyscale Dash wrote:I thought when you spent lots of resources in something there was always the risk of that something getting changed. I do not understand at all why more people don't complain about htis sort of thing. Titans are a good example you spend good isk and more importantly time to just have CCP nerf what ever you do. If they are going to institute major changes then players should be given the option of having the sp returned. Fair is fair. As an aside, very poor customer service in having to be told to offer this in the first place.
Sorry that improving the quality of life for everyone else in the game is an inconvenience to you. Thankfully you're just one lonely, overly noisy, irrelevant, solitary individual.
|

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
502
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
What I'm trying to say is your opinion is wrong. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:25:00 -
[17] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:What I'm trying to say is your opinion is wrong.
Alas you are a goon so your opinion is as worthless to me as your leader's.
Clearly you lack any sort of reading comprehension otherwise you would have picked up the point I was making from the get go.
CCP should be allowing people to reinvest their SP when they make major changes. |

Im Super Gay
Hedion University Amarr Empire
56
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
I missed the part where you can't use contracts anymore. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6457
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:26:00 -
[19] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I do not understand at all why more people don't complain about htis sort of thing. Because there is nothing to complain about.
Quote:Titans are a good example you spend good isk and more importantly time to just have CCP nerf what ever you do. Yes, that happens when things are not working properly.
Quote:If they are going to institute major changes then players should be given the option of having the sp returned. And when major changes are instituted, they do. Making Titans more reasonable and improving the market do not constitute major changes.
Quote:As an aside, very poor customer service in having to be told to offer this in the first place. No, just very poor customers. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
503
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:28:00 -
[20] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote: Clearly you lack any sort of reading comprehension otherwise you would have picked up the point I was making from the get go.
Perhaps that was the point in your first post, unfortunately you followed it up with infantile whining. Thankfully contracting remains in game so your skill points remain relevant. Its unfortunate that you're unable to recognize that. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:31:00 -
[21] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I do not understand at all why more people don't complain about htis sort of thing. Because there is nothing to complain about. Quote:Titans are a good example you spend good isk and more importantly time to just have CCP nerf what ever you do. Yes, that happens when things are not working properly. Quote:If they are going to institute major changes then players should be given the option of having the sp returned. And when major changes are instituted, they do. Making Titans more reasonable and improving the market do not constitute major changes. Quote:As an aside, very poor customer service in having to be told to offer this in the first place. No, just very poor customers.
People don't complain because of people like yourself who immediately start to put them down and their ideas. You can't convince ignoramuses like yourself of anything because you already know it all.
Working properly is relative. Contracts were working just fine. The only reason this was changed was to allow for values to appear on killmails (sometime in the future). Killmails which are used for such worthless things in determining corp efficiency etc, which I would like to point out the mass whoring of mails that occurred during the burn Jita event. Killmaills are a worthless waste of time and effort.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6457
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:34:00 -
[22] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:People don't complain because of people like yourself who immediately start to put them down GǪbecause they're complaining over nothing. In this case, you're complaining over a feature that is still in the game and that you can still use, and which you (presumably) have been putting to good use for a while now.
Quote:Working properly is relative. Contracts were working just fine. GǪand that's why contracts didn't change, nor did the skills you're complaining about. So why should you get any SP back when nothing has been lost or removed?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
504
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:34:00 -
[23] - Quote
You have an unending ability for selfishness. Killmails matter to a tremendous number of players. And nearly all major killboard software implementations have supported the cost of faction modules for a very long time now. Just because they have no interest to one vocal minority doesn't mean they don't matter to the rest of us.
Just to repeat my earlier post, if you're unable to think of an effective use for this skill that's your fault, not CCPs. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:36:00 -
[24] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:You have an unending ability for selfishness. Killmails matter to a tremendous number of players. And nearly all major killboard software implementations have supported the cost of faction modules for a very long time now. Just because they have no interest to one vocal minority doesn't mean they don't matter to the rest of us.
Just to repeat my earlier post, if you're unable to think of an effective use for this skill that's your fault, not CCPs.
So CCP is changing this why then? Answer: No good reason.
|

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:37:00 -
[25] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:People don't complain because of people like yourself who immediately start to put them down GǪbecause they're complaining over nothing. In this case, you're complaining over a feature that is still in the game and that you can still use, and which you (presumably) have been putting to good use for a while now. Quote:Working properly is relative. Contracts were working just fine. GǪand that's why contracts didn't change, nor did the skills you're complaining about. So why should you get any SP back when nothing has been lost or removed?
If CCP changes their game that that an individuals game is impacted to the extent where previous game play is no longer an option then the only option is to start doing something else. So because CCP has decided to change the game and make (potentially make) a character worthless everyone gets to start over again. That is not fun at all.
|

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
504
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:40:00 -
[26] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:You have an unending ability for selfishness. Killmails matter to a tremendous number of players. And nearly all major killboard software implementations have supported the cost of faction modules for a very long time now. Just because they have no interest to one vocal minority doesn't mean they don't matter to the rest of us.
Just to repeat my earlier post, if you're unable to think of an effective use for this skill that's your fault, not CCPs. So CCP is changing this why then? Answer: No good reason.
They haven't changed a thing with contracts. You can still list faction modules in contract if you want to, many people still do since contracts allow cross region searching. CCP didn't put faction items on the market to nerf contracts they did it to improve the quality of life of players all across the game; this is a feature that has been in demand for years!
This is why they won't refund skill points. The function of those skills has not changed at all. |

Terranid Meester
Tactical Assault and Recon Unit
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:40:00 -
[27] - Quote
Nothing to see here, move along, move along.... |

Whitehound
257
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:40:00 -
[28] - Quote
Your name worries me more than your problem.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
504
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:41:00 -
[29] - Quote
Terranid Meester wrote:Nothing to see here, move along, move along....
Go get your own pubbie filth to play with, this one is mine! |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:42:00 -
[30] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:You have an unending ability for selfishness. Killmails matter to a tremendous number of players. And nearly all major killboard software implementations have supported the cost of faction modules for a very long time now. Just because they have no interest to one vocal minority doesn't mean they don't matter to the rest of us.
Just to repeat my earlier post, if you're unable to think of an effective use for this skill that's your fault, not CCPs. So CCP is changing this why then? Answer: No good reason. They haven't changed a thing with contracts. You can still list faction modules in contract if you want to, many people still do since contracts allow cross region searching. CCP didn't put faction items on the market to nerf contracts they did it to improve the quality of life of players all across the game; this is a feature that has been in demand for years!
Maybe you should stick to selling your price fixed ships to your goon alliance mates since you have really no clue on how this change has affected the dynamic of the market.
|

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
504
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:45:00 -
[31] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:You have an unending ability for selfishness. Killmails matter to a tremendous number of players. And nearly all major killboard software implementations have supported the cost of faction modules for a very long time now. Just because they have no interest to one vocal minority doesn't mean they don't matter to the rest of us.
Just to repeat my earlier post, if you're unable to think of an effective use for this skill that's your fault, not CCPs. So CCP is changing this why then? Answer: No good reason. They haven't changed a thing with contracts. You can still list faction modules in contract if you want to, many people still do since contracts allow cross region searching. CCP didn't put faction items on the market to nerf contracts they did it to improve the quality of life of players all across the game; this is a feature that has been in demand for years! Maybe you should stick to selling your price fixed ships to your goon alliance mates since you have really no clue on how this change has affected the dynamic of the market.
Taking a look at the market sub-forum, you're the only person whining about this and that forum is filled folks way smarter than the both of us. If this was actually a problem they would be making a big deal about it. I'm hoping Weasilor pops up in this thread to properly blow you out of the water. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:46:00 -
[32] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:You have an unending ability for selfishness. Killmails matter to a tremendous number of players. And nearly all major killboard software implementations have supported the cost of faction modules for a very long time now. Just because they have no interest to one vocal minority doesn't mean they don't matter to the rest of us.
Just to repeat my earlier post, if you're unable to think of an effective use for this skill that's your fault, not CCPs. So CCP is changing this why then? Answer: No good reason. They haven't changed a thing with contracts. You can still list faction modules in contract if you want to, many people still do since contracts allow cross region searching. CCP didn't put faction items on the market to nerf contracts they did it to improve the quality of life of players all across the game; this is a feature that has been in demand for years! Maybe you should stick to selling your price fixed ships to your goon alliance mates since you have really no clue on how this change has affected the dynamic of the market. Taking a look at the market sub-forum, you're the only person whining about this and that forum is filled folks way smarter than the both of us. If this was actually a problem they would be making a big deal about it. I'm hoping Weasilor pops up in this thread to properly blow you out of the water.
Right, I keep forgetting you are a know nothing nobody who keeps posting in my thread.
/ignore |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6457
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:47:00 -
[33] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:So CCP is changing this why then? Answer: No good reason. Because it makes sense; because it makes things more consistent; because it makes things more efficient; because it improves a number of other features. Plenty of good reasons. As a bonus, it doesn't break anything.
Quote:If CCP changes their game that that an individuals game is impacted to the extent where previous game play is no longer an option GǪand when they do that, they do indeed give people their SP back. That's not what is happening here, though. You can still use the skills for the same thing they've always been used for. Nothing has changed with how contracts work; what contracts can be used for; how the contract skills work.
So why should they give you any SP back when nothing has been lost or removed? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
504
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:49:00 -
[34] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote: Right, I keep forgetting you are a know nothing nobody who keeps posting in my thread.
/ignore
* posts my parting shot * /ignore "You can't touch me! You can't touch me!"
Another example of the courage of high-sec pubbie filth. |

Sobach
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
25
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:50:00 -
[35] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Maybe you should stick to selling your price fixed ships to your goon alliance mates since you have really no clue on how this change has affected the dynamic of the market.
at first I was like because I thought you were trolling, but then I was like for the state of mankind when I realized you were serious.
By your logic, I should have my entire skillpool refunded because the recent drone/loot changes affected market price for just about every ship. |

SeaBassSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:51:00 -
[36] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote: Right, I keep forgetting you are a know nothing nobody who keeps posting in my thread.
/ignore
* posts my parting shot * /ignore "You can't touch me! You can't touch me!" Another example of high-sec pubbie filth's cowardice.
Pubbies gonna pub. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:52:00 -
[37] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:So CCP is changing this why then? Answer: No good reason. Because it makes sense; because it makes things more consistent; because it makes things more efficient; because it improves a number of other features. Plenty of good reasons. As a bonus, it doesn't break anything. Quote:If CCP changes their game that that an individuals game is impacted to the extent where previous game play is no longer an option GǪand when they do that, they do indeed give people their SP back. That's not what is happening here, though. You can still use the skills for the same thing they've always been used for. Nothing has changed with how contracts work; what contracts can be used for; how the contract skills work. So why should they give you any SP back when nothing has been lost or removed?
Argument here is not that you can't use them. Argument is you can not use them in the same way. While this is not a major change for everyone it is a major change just the same. Very easy customer service issue to resolve. Refund the SP.
|

MeestaPenni
Deadman W0nderland The 99 Percent
242
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:52:00 -
[38] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote: a home made pie made from a medley of the finest fruits and berries Iceland has to offer.
That's probably a very thin pie.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
I am not Prencleeve Grothsmore. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6457
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:55:00 -
[39] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Argument here is not that you can't use them. GǪand that's why there is no reason to give you your SP back. Your skills still do exactly what they did before; you can use them in the exact same way. You have decided that you don't want to. That's your problem, and no-one else's. There is quite literally nothing to resolve. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:57:00 -
[40] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Argument here is not that you can't use them. GǪand that's why there is no reason to give you your SP back. Your skills still do exactly what they did before; you can use them in the exact same way. You have decided that you don't want to. That's your problem, and no-one else's. There is quite literally nothing to resolve.
No, I can not do EXACTLY as I did before. If I could I would not be complaining.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6457
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 22:58:00 -
[41] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:No, I can not do EXACTLY as I did before. Yes you can.
Quote:If I could I would not be complaining. GǪand yet you are, most likely because you're not thinking very clearly.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Sobach
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
25
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:01:00 -
[42] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote: No, I can not do EXACTLY as I did before. If I could I would not be complaining.
yes you can, you just have another source of competition for your profit, and that's what you're ultimately complaining about. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:02:00 -
[43] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:No, I can not do EXACTLY as I did before. Yes you can. Quote:If I could I would not be complaining. GǪand yet you are, most likely because you're not thinking very clearly.
Saying that I can do exactly as I did before implies that that the market exists in the way that it did before. It doesn't, ergo I can't not do exactly what I was doing before. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:03:00 -
[44] - Quote
Sobach wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote: No, I can not do EXACTLY as I did before. If I could I would not be complaining.
yes you can, you just have another source of competition for your profit, and that's what you're ultimately complaining about.
Competition is not the issue. if I can't do what I was doing before in the way that I was doing it, I don't want to be bothered. Refund the meager amount of SP and let me choose a different profession. Customer service issue resolved. |

Whitehound
257
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:05:00 -
[45] - Quote
Tippia wrote:So why should they give you any SP back when nothing has been lost or removed? CCP reimbursed us with SPs after they had removed the learning skills. They did not have to do this back then either, because we did all get our attributes raised. The removal of the learning skills then did not change a lot about how we play the game either. Yet, CCP thought it was just to do so.
I do not care about the OP's problem, it is not my job, but at least I am not ignorant to what is asked here. 
OP does have a very valid point. The only problem is how CCP shall determine who should get their skill removed and who not? Because this will require organizational efforts do I doubt this will take place. The learning skills were removed for everyone and everyone could SPs in return - not much effort there besides writing a script.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:08:00 -
[46] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:You have an unending ability for selfishness. Killmails matter to a tremendous number of players. And nearly all major killboard software implementations have supported the cost of faction modules for a very long time now. Just because they have no interest to one vocal minority doesn't mean they don't matter to the rest of us.
Just to repeat my earlier post, if you're unable to think of an effective use for this skill that's your fault, not CCPs. So CCP is changing this why then? Answer: No good reason.
CCP made this change solely to upset you. You, personally, are the reason they did this change. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Fabulousli Obvious
State War Academy Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:08:00 -
[47] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote: IF they keep this up I am going to be ruined.
Girlfriend, look in that CQ mirror, then remove the words "going to be". Last words:-á Either that wallpaper goes, or I do. ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6457
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:09:00 -
[48] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Saying that I can do exactly as I did before implies that that the market exists in the way that it did before. No it doesn't. It implies that you can do exactly as you did before, which you can.
Your encountering more competition is not something they have to compensate you for. If you choose to waste the SP you've accumulated, then that's still solely your problem (and also not something that anyone has to compensate you for).
Quote:Competition is not the issue. if I can't do what I was doing before in the way that I was doing it, I don't want to be bothered. Since you can do what you were doing before the way you were doing it, competition is the only issue GÇö it's what will slow your turnaround down. Nothing in the way of functionality or use is being changed in the slightest.
Whitehound wrote:CCP reimbursed us with SPs after they had removed the learning skills. GǪbecause it represented training time lost to functionality that was no longer in the game. Pretty much completely unlike what the OP is whinging about. The OP has roughly no point whatsoever and is just kvetching over his own refusal to adapt and to make good use of the skills he chose to train, and using a pretty blatant argument from ignorance to try to shift the blame for that refusal onto someone else. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Fabulousli Obvious
State War Academy Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:09:00 -
[49] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Your name worries me more than your problem.
You only think YOU have problems with it....... Last words:-á Either that wallpaper goes, or I do. ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900 |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:09:00 -
[50] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:So why should they give you any SP back when nothing has been lost or removed? CCP reimbursed us with SPs after they had removed the learning skills. They did not have to do this back then either, because we did all get our attributes raised. The removal of the learning skills then did not change a lot about how we play the game either. Yet, CCP thought it was just to do so. I do not care about the OP's problem, it is not my job, but at least I am not ignorant to what is asked here.  OP does have a very valid point. The only problem is how CCP shall determine who should get their skill removed and who not? Because this will require organizational efforts do I doubt this will take place. The learning skills were removed for everyone and everyone got SPs in return - not much effort there besides writing a script.
Was the contracting system removed? Is the OP no longer able to make contracts? Are those people who bought titans still able to fly titans? The ships themselves haven't been removed have they? Then you don't get any SP refunded. Because you are dumb. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:10:00 -
[51] - Quote
I am certain we all know a player or two that has quit after CCP made this sort of change. Yes the impact may mean nothing to you but it was enough of a change to be unpalatable to the person who quit. I think EVE would be much bigger if more attention and consideration was made on the changes that CCP implements.
Imagine if it was you who dreamed of flying a titan as it was and you trained a toon to have Titan V. How let down would you feel if CCP burst your bubble?
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6457
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:12:00 -
[52] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am certain we all know a player or two that has quit after CCP made this sort of change. Not really, no.
Quote:Imagine if it was you who dreamed of flying a titan as it was and you trained a toon to have Titan V. How let down would you feel if CCP burst your bubble? A game without titans? That would be wonderful. Unfortunately (or fortunately for those who trained for them), no such bubble-bursting will happen.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:12:00 -
[53] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Saying that I can do exactly as I did before implies that that the market exists in the way that it did before. No it doesn't. It implies that you can do exactly as you did before, which you can. Your encountering more competition is not something they have to compensate you for. If you choose to waste the SP you've accumulated, then that's still solely your problem (and also not something that anyone has to compensate you for). Whitehound wrote:CCP reimbursed us with SPs after they had removed the learning skills. GǪbecause it represented training time lost to functionality that was no longer in the game. Pretty much completely unlike what the OP is whinging about. The OP has roughly no point whatsoever and is just kvetching over his own refusal to adapt and to make good use of the skills he chose to train, and using a pretty blatant argument from ignorance to try to shift the blame for that refusal onto someone else.
I am telling you that the game has changed for me because of what they did. You telling me it hasn't makes absolutely no sense. Please don't tell me how to feel or tell me what I should be perceiving. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:12:00 -
[54] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am certain we all know a player or two that has quit after CCP made this sort of change. Yes the impact may mean nothing to you but it was enough of a change to be unpalatable to the person who quit. I think EVE would be much bigger if more attention and consideration was made on the changes that CCP implements.
Imagine if it was you who dreamed of flying a titan as it was and you trained a toon to have Titan V. How let down would you feel if CCP burst your bubble?
If CCP removed Titans I'm sure they would also remove the titan skill and reimburse the skill points. As it stands, you can still list your faction loot on contracts, so nothing has been lost. The only thing that has happened is features have been added.
Also, this. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Whitehound
257
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:12:00 -
[55] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:[Was the contracting system removed? Is the OP no longer able to make contracts? Are those people who bought titans still able to fly titans? The ships themselves haven't been removed have they? Then you don't get any SP refunded. Because you are dumb. No, you are dumb. Why did you get SPs for the removal of the learning skills? You do not know. You just sucked it up and said "thank you".
There was no need to give any of us SPs for them. Training speed has simply not changed and I had them all at 5.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:14:00 -
[56] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am certain we all know a player or two that has quit after CCP made this sort of change. Yes the impact may mean nothing to you but it was enough of a change to be unpalatable to the person who quit. I think EVE would be much bigger if more attention and consideration was made on the changes that CCP implements.
Imagine if it was you who dreamed of flying a titan as it was and you trained a toon to have Titan V. How let down would you feel if CCP burst your bubble?
If CCP removed Titans I'm sure they would also remove the titan skill and reimburse the skill points. As it stands, you can still list your faction loot on contracts, so nothing has been lost. The only thing that has happened is features have been added. Also, this.
You are missing the point. Yes you can still fly a "Titan" but it isn't the same "Titan" that you set out to fly. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:15:00 -
[57] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:[Was the contracting system removed? Is the OP no longer able to make contracts? Are those people who bought titans still able to fly titans? The ships themselves haven't been removed have they? Then you don't get any SP refunded. Because you are dumb. No, you are dumb. Why did you get SPs for the removal of the learning skills? You do not know. You just sucked it up and said "thank you". There was no need to give any of us SPs for them. Training speed has simply not changed and I had them all at 5.
Haha, what. We got those SP refunded because they removed the Learning Skills. Why else would we have gotten them? Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:16:00 -
[58] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am certain we all know a player or two that has quit after CCP made this sort of change. Yes the impact may mean nothing to you but it was enough of a change to be unpalatable to the person who quit. I think EVE would be much bigger if more attention and consideration was made on the changes that CCP implements.
Imagine if it was you who dreamed of flying a titan as it was and you trained a toon to have Titan V. How let down would you feel if CCP burst your bubble?
If CCP removed Titans I'm sure they would also remove the titan skill and reimburse the skill points. As it stands, you can still list your faction loot on contracts, so nothing has been lost. The only thing that has happened is features have been added. Also, this. You are missing the point. Yes you can still fly a "Titan" but it isn't the same "Titan" that you set out to fly.
Is it still a Titan? Is it still the same DoomsDaying, Jump Portal Generating, 100 billion isk Loot Pinata that it always was? Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:17:00 -
[59] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Whitehound wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:[Was the contracting system removed? Is the OP no longer able to make contracts? Are those people who bought titans still able to fly titans? The ships themselves haven't been removed have they? Then you don't get any SP refunded. Because you are dumb. No, you are dumb. Why did you get SPs for the removal of the learning skills? You do not know. You just sucked it up and said "thank you". There was no need to give any of us SPs for them. Training speed has simply not changed and I had them all at 5. Haha, what. We got those SP refunded because they removed the Learning Skills. Why else would we have gotten them?
You got them back because CCP foresaw a potentially large customer service issue. Basically there was going to be massive QQ so they preempted it all. All I am asking is for the same courtesy for my relatively minor issue. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6457
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:17:00 -
[60] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am telling you that the game has changed for me because of what they did. GǪand I'm telling you that no mechanics have changed that in any way would warrant a refund of SP. You can still use the skills the exact same way they were always used. You've chosen not to use them like that any more for various reasons. You've chosen not to investigate what else you can use those skills for. In other words, you have chosen to make your SP worthless. This is your choice and no-one else's. Stop blaming others for your own choices.
Quote:Please don't tell me how to feel or tell me what I should be perceiving. Since it is quite obvious that you could use a pair of glasses to clear up the perception problems you're having, I think I will.
Whitehound wrote:Why did you get SPs for the removal of the learning skills? Because they represented training time spent on a mechanic that was removed from the game. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:18:00 -
[61] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am certain we all know a player or two that has quit after CCP made this sort of change. Yes the impact may mean nothing to you but it was enough of a change to be unpalatable to the person who quit. I think EVE would be much bigger if more attention and consideration was made on the changes that CCP implements.
Imagine if it was you who dreamed of flying a titan as it was and you trained a toon to have Titan V. How let down would you feel if CCP burst your bubble?
If CCP removed Titans I'm sure they would also remove the titan skill and reimburse the skill points. As it stands, you can still list your faction loot on contracts, so nothing has been lost. The only thing that has happened is features have been added. Also, this. You are missing the point. Yes you can still fly a "Titan" but it isn't the same "Titan" that you set out to fly. Is it still a Titan? Is it still the same DoomsDaying, Jump Portal Generating, 100 billion isk Loot Pinata that it always was?
If you are going to be purposefully narrow minded then you might want to find another thread to post in since you aren't making any valid points in this one.
|

Whitehound
257
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:18:00 -
[62] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Haha, what. We got those SP refunded because they removed the Learning Skills. Why else would we have gotten them? "Haha what," exactly. You are dumb as a tree. The questions is why would you need these SPs or why would you deserve them when nothing of your game has changed?
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Dessau
40
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:19:00 -
[63] - Quote
Can't tell if gay princess of a mafia, or princess of a gay mafia. CCP. Non-Russians deserve red jackets. As an alternative, I would also accept some form of USA-only content. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:20:00 -
[64] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am telling you that the game has changed for me because of what they did. GǪand I'm telling you that no mechanics have changed that in any way would warrant a refund of SP. You can still use the skills the exact same way they were always used. You've chosen not to use them like that any more for various reasons. You've chosen not to investigate what else you can use those skills for. In other words, you have chosen to make your SP worthless. This is your choice and no-one else's. Stop blaming others for your own choices. Quote:Please don't tell me how to feel or tell me what I should be perceiving. Since it is quite obvious that you could use a pair of glasses to clear up the perception problems you're having, I think I will. Whitehound wrote:Why did you get SPs for the removal of the learning skills? Because they represented training time spent on a mechanic that was removed from the game.
Sorry my mistake, you must be one of the goon/devs who decide CCP policy. My mistake. I really wish that goon alts wore badges sometimes.  |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:20:00 -
[65] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:Whitehound wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:[Was the contracting system removed? Is the OP no longer able to make contracts? Are those people who bought titans still able to fly titans? The ships themselves haven't been removed have they? Then you don't get any SP refunded. Because you are dumb. No, you are dumb. Why did you get SPs for the removal of the learning skills? You do not know. You just sucked it up and said "thank you". There was no need to give any of us SPs for them. Training speed has simply not changed and I had them all at 5. Haha, what. We got those SP refunded because they removed the Learning Skills. Why else would we have gotten them? You got them back because CCP foresaw a potentially large customer service issue. Basically there was going to be massive QQ so they preempted it all. All I am asking is for the same courtesy for my relatively minor issue.
Your issue is a hugely minor issue that literally no one else gives enough fucks about to whine on the forums. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:20:00 -
[66] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am telling you that the game has changed for me because of what they did. GǪand I'm telling you that no mechanics have changed that in any way would warrant a refund of SP. You can still use the skills the exact same way they were always used. You've chosen not to use them like that any more for various reasons. You've chosen not to investigate what else you can use those skills for. In other words, you have chosen to make your SP worthless. This is your choice and no-one else's. Stop blaming others for your own choices. Quote:Please don't tell me how to feel or tell me what I should be perceiving. Since it is quite obvious that you could use a pair of glasses to clear up the perception problems you're having, I think I will. Whitehound wrote:Why did you get SPs for the removal of the learning skills? Because they represented training time spent on a mechanic that was removed from the game. Sorry my mistake, you must be one of the goon/devs who decide CCP policy. My mistake. I really wish that goon alts wore badges sometimes. 
I like your terrible opinion that Goons aren't allowed to have opinions. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Fabulousli Obvious
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:21:00 -
[67] - Quote
Tippia wrote:they represented training time spent on a mechanic that was removed from the game.
Did I ever tell you about that 'training time' I spent with that mechanic ? Last words:-á Either that wallpaper goes, or I do. ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900 |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:22:00 -
[68] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:Haha, what. We got those SP refunded because they removed the Learning Skills. Why else would we have gotten them? "Haha what," exactly. You are dumb as a tree. The questions is why would you need these SPs or why would you deserve them when nothing of your game has changed?
Why would the OP need her SP refunded when her game literally hasn't changed and she still has all the same functionality that she had before?
The only thing I can think of is that she was trying to contract scam with those Faction Mods. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Jack Tronic
borkedLabs
43
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:22:00 -
[69] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Greyscale Dash wrote:I thought when you spent lots of resources in something there was always the risk of that something getting changed. I do not understand at all why more people don't complain about htis sort of thing. Titans are a good example you spend good isk and more importantly time to just have CCP nerf what ever you do. If they are going to institute major changes then players should be given the option of having the sp returned. Fair is fair. As an aside, very poor customer service in having to be told to offer this in the first place.
Titans were an example when isk was overpowering the numbers and skills which shouldn't have been allowed. |

Whitehound
257
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:23:00 -
[70] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:CCP reimbursed us with SPs after they had removed the learning skills. GǪbecause it represented training time lost to functionality that was no longer in the game. Nonsense. You could have easily lived without these SPs. Are you not able to harden up? Do you need SPs reimbursed or else you do you start crying? Tell me, why do you deserve SPs and others do not? You cannot tell me, because you are just a sucker to all of CCP's decisions.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6458
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:23:00 -
[71] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Sorry my mistake, you must be one of the goon/devs who decide CCP policy. No, I'm one of the people telling you that you're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist.
Nothing has changed, nothing has been removed, thus there is no reason for you to get any SP back. There is plenty of reason to have a closer look at those skills and consider what you can do with them, thoughGǪ
Whitehound wrote:Nonsense. You could have easily lived without these SPs. So what? It's still time invested into a mechanic that was removed, which is a pretty good reason for reimbursement.
Quote:Tell me, why do you deserve SPs and others do not? EhmGǪ what? Everyone did, so everyone got them. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Fabulousli Obvious
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:23:00 -
[72] - Quote
Dessau wrote:Can't tell if gay princess of a mafia, or princess of a gay mafia.
Princess part is settled. I'll ALWAYS be Queen.
Last words:-á Either that wallpaper goes, or I do. ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900 |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:24:00 -
[73] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Whitehound wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:Haha, what. We got those SP refunded because they removed the Learning Skills. Why else would we have gotten them? "Haha what," exactly. You are dumb as a tree. The questions is why would you need these SPs or why would you deserve them when nothing of your game has changed? Why would the OP need her SP refunded when her game literally hasn't changed and she still has all the same functionality that she had before? The only thing I can think of is that she was trying to contract scam with those Faction Mods.
Scam or no scam does it make a difference? No. CCP is a company. I am a customer. If you are in any business you try to keep your customers happy. All I am asking for is consideration given the recent changes. |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:26:00 -
[74] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I do not understand at all why more people don't complain about htis sort of thing. Because there is nothing to complain about. Quote:Titans are a good example you spend good isk and more importantly time to just have CCP nerf what ever you do. Yes, that happens when things are not working properly. Quote:If they are going to institute major changes then players should be given the option of having the sp returned. And when major changes are instituted, they do. Making Titans more reasonable and improving the market do not constitute major changes. Quote:As an aside, very poor customer service in having to be told to offer this in the first place. No, just very poor customers.
^^^^^^^^^ This Fail Troll is fail
And maybe you should fly a titan with another 100 of them to understand WHY they were nerfed. But hey, ignorance is bliss to some. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:26:00 -
[75] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Sorry my mistake, you must be one of the goon/devs who decide CCP policy. No, I'm one of the people telling you that you're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist. Nothing has changed, nothing has been removed, thus there is no reason for you to get any SP back. There is plenty of reason to have a closer look at those skills and consider what you can do with them, thoughGǪ
You are bullying and belittling. If you have no function within CCP then telling any of THEIR customers that their problem is invalid isn't really helping the situation.
|

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:26:00 -
[76] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:CCP reimbursed us with SPs after they had removed the learning skills. GǪbecause it represented training time lost to functionality that was no longer in the game. Nonsense. You could have easily lived without these SPs. Are you not able to harden up? Do you need SPs reimbursed or else you do you start crying? Tell me, why do you deserve SPs and others do not? You cannot tell me, because you are just a sucker to all of CCP's decisions.
Did Tippia whine when the learning skills were removed? I'll bet the answer is "I don't know." or "It doesn't matter." Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:27:00 -
[77] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Sorry my mistake, you must be one of the goon/devs who decide CCP policy. No, I'm one of the people telling you that you're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist. Nothing has changed, nothing has been removed, thus there is no reason for you to get any SP back. There is plenty of reason to have a closer look at those skills and consider what you can do with them, thoughGǪ You are bullying and belittling. If you have no function within CCP then telling any of THEIR customers that their problem is invalid isn't really helping the situation.
Your problem is valid, unfortunately, your problem is also really, really inane. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:28:00 -
[78] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Sorry my mistake, you must be one of the goon/devs who decide CCP policy. No, I'm one of the people telling you that you're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist. Nothing has changed, nothing has been removed, thus there is no reason for you to get any SP back. There is plenty of reason to have a closer look at those skills and consider what you can do with them, thoughGǪ You are bullying and belittling. If you have no function within CCP then telling any of THEIR customers that their problem is invalid isn't really helping the situation.
Tier 3 BCs..... graphic changes.... UI ******* changes.... Did I miss anything else that "the customers" have suggested and had incorperated???? |

Whitehound
257
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:28:00 -
[79] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Why would the OP need her SP refunded when her game literally hasn't changed and she still has all the same functionality that she had before?
The only thing I can think of is that she was trying to contract scam with those Faction Mods. Because for the same reasons why we got SPs for the removal of the learning skills - those who invested time into these skills hated the change. If CCP had not given us SPs then people would have been whining all over the forum about it.
You are nothing but selfish when you deny others their claim for SP reimbursement when a game change makes earlier skill decisions redundant.
It is also not your job to decide if someone deserve it it or not. It is CCP's job. And no amount of crap posts will change it either. So you can just shut up.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
257
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:29:00 -
[80] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Did Tippia whine when the learning skills were removed? I'll bet the answer is "I don't know." or "It doesn't matter." Ask her. Why do you ask me, stupid?
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:29:00 -
[81] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Sorry my mistake, you must be one of the goon/devs who decide CCP policy. No, I'm one of the people telling you that you're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist. Nothing has changed, nothing has been removed, thus there is no reason for you to get any SP back. There is plenty of reason to have a closer look at those skills and consider what you can do with them, thoughGǪ You are bullying and belittling. If you have no function within CCP then telling any of THEIR customers that their problem is invalid isn't really helping the situation. Your problem is valid, unfortunately, your problem is also really, really inane.
TY I guess. Maybe inane for you but it would take a whole of what 20 keystrokes on CCP's part to resolve. I would be happy and if they implemented the policy to others, everyone would be happy.
|

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:30:00 -
[82] - Quote
OP, I'm sure that this issue is very distressing for you. Unfortunately, CCP isn't going to refund your SP, probably because they don't feel that it is an important issue. The question is, what are you going to do about it other than trying and failing to make a stink on the forums? Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:31:00 -
[83] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Sorry my mistake, you must be one of the goon/devs who decide CCP policy. No, I'm one of the people telling you that you're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist. Nothing has changed, nothing has been removed, thus there is no reason for you to get any SP back. There is plenty of reason to have a closer look at those skills and consider what you can do with them, thoughGǪ You are bullying and belittling. If you have no function within CCP then telling any of THEIR customers that their problem is invalid isn't really helping the situation. Your problem is valid, unfortunately, your problem is also really, really inane. TY I guess. Maybe inane for you but it would take a whole of what 20 keystrokes on CCP's part to resolve. I would be happy and if they implemented the policy to others, everyone would be happy.
But the thing is, nobody else really cares. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6459
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:33:00 -
[84] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:If you have no function within CCP then telling any of THEIR customers that their problem is invalid isn't really helping the situation. Why would I help a situation that is based on ignorance and nonsense?
Again, nothing has changed, nothing has been removed, so why on earth should you get any SP back?
Quote:Scam or no scam does it make a difference? No. CCP is a company. I am a customer. GǪand the contract you signed with them warned you about changes that would happen Gǣjust becauseGǥ so even if they had changed how contracts work, you wouldn't have much of a case. Since they didn't change anything about them, you pretty much have no case at all.
It seems you're dead set on wasting your skill points, and you want CCP to fix your decision. How about, instead, you look at what you can actually do and make good use of them?
Quote:Maybe inane for you but it would take a whole of what 20 keystrokes on CCP's part to resolve. It would also be a drastic policy change, where you no longer have to account for your own decisions and choices. That change would affect us all. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:33:00 -
[85] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:OP, I'm sure that this issue is very distressing for you. Unfortunately, CCP isn't going to refund your SP, probably because they don't feel that it is an important issue. The question is, what are you going to do about it other than trying and failing to make a stink on the forums?
This is a sad state of affairs if I were to believe it was true. I am certain others feel the exact same way but because of certain voices in the community they keep their heads down. I really hope CCP takes a look at their policies and really starts making customer service a priority.
|

Xavier Bandar
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:33:00 -
[86] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Scam or no scam does it make a difference? No. CCP is a company. I am a customer. If you are in any business you try to keep your customers happy. All I am asking for is consideration given the recent changes.
As a business, you can't keep all of your customers happy. Some customers are just whiny, little bitches who deserve nothing but contempt and ridicule. |

Whitehound
257
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:33:00 -
[87] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:OP, I'm sure that this issue is very distressing for you. Unfortunately, CCP isn't going to refund your SP, probably because they don't feel that it is an important issue. The question is, what are you going to do about it other than trying and failing to make a stink on the forums? She takes it onto the forums whereas you swallow everything and then say it makes you hard. No one can help you ...
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1806
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:33:00 -
[88] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Sorry my mistake, you must be one of the goon/devs who decide CCP policy. No, I'm one of the people telling you that you're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist. Nothing has changed, nothing has been removed, thus there is no reason for you to get any SP back. There is plenty of reason to have a closer look at those skills and consider what you can do with them, thoughGǪ You are bullying and belittling. If you have no function within CCP then telling any of THEIR customers that their problem is invalid isn't really helping the situation.
If by bullying and belittling you mean factual and helpful, then sure.
The contract mechanic was not removed, more options were given for purchasing faction mods.
More options = good in most peoples book.
In fact, the only reason to get so bent out of shape is if you were running scams. Not that running scams is a bad thing, but you could at least be honest about it. That way, you might be recognized as having a quasi-legitimate complaint instead of being seen (correctly) as an amateur forum troll. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:34:00 -
[89] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:Why would the OP need her SP refunded when her game literally hasn't changed and she still has all the same functionality that she had before?
The only thing I can think of is that she was trying to contract scam with those Faction Mods. Because for the same reasons why we got SPs for the removal of the learning skills - those who invested time into these skills hated the change. If CCP had not given us SPs then people would have been whining all over the forum about it. You are nothing but selfish when you deny others their claim for SP reimbursement when a game change makes earlier skill decisions redundant. It is also not your job to decide if someone deserve it it or not. It is CCP's job. And no amount of crap posts will change it either. So you can just shut up.
I agree with everything except... "Because for the same reasons why we got SPs for the removal of the learning skills - those who invested time into these skills hated the change." This... is wrong.... We got SP because they said we were when they dropped the skills. No one "hated" the change mate, infact it was one of the nicest things CCP has done for the players in a long time, IE: Make skilling less time consuming. I have yet to meet someone that actually wants their learning skills back >.> |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:34:00 -
[90] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:OP, I'm sure that this issue is very distressing for you. Unfortunately, CCP isn't going to refund your SP, probably because they don't feel that it is an important issue. The question is, what are you going to do about it other than trying and failing to make a stink on the forums? She takes it onto the forums whereas you swallow everything and then say it makes you hard. No one can help you ...
Yes, I do swallow, and yes, it DOES make me hard.
You heard it here first folks, swallowing makes me hard. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:35:00 -
[91] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:If you have no function within CCP then telling any of THEIR customers that their problem is invalid isn't really helping the situation. Why would I help a situation that is based on ignorance and nonsense? Again, nothing has changed, nothing has been removed, so why on earth should you get any SP back? Quote:Scam or no scam does it make a difference? No. CCP is a company. I am a customer. GǪand the contract you signed with them warned you about changes that would happen Gǣjust becauseGǥ so even if they had changed how contracts work, you wouldn't have much of a case. Since they didn't change anything about them, you pretty much have no case at all. It seems you're dead set on wasting your skill points, and you want CCP to fix your decision. How about, instead, you look at what you can actually do and make good use of them?
So to sum up what you are saying:
1) My feelings as a customer don't matter 2) CCP says so
Sorry not going to buy it no matter how many new ways you say it.
|

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:35:00 -
[92] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:OP, I'm sure that this issue is very distressing for you. Unfortunately, CCP isn't going to refund your SP, probably because they don't feel that it is an important issue. The question is, what are you going to do about it other than trying and failing to make a stink on the forums? This is a sad state of affairs if I were to believe it was true. I am certain others feel the exact same way but because of certain voices in the community they keep their heads down. I really hope CCP takes a look at their policies and really starts making customer service a priority.
Your ********...... |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
400
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:36:00 -
[93] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Sorry my mistake, you must be one of the goon/devs who decide CCP policy. No, I'm one of the people telling you that you're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist. Nothing has changed, nothing has been removed, thus there is no reason for you to get any SP back. There is plenty of reason to have a closer look at those skills and consider what you can do with them, thoughGǪ You are bullying and belittling. If you have no function within CCP then telling any of THEIR customers that their problem is invalid isn't really helping the situation. If by bullying and belittling you mean factual and helpful, then sure. The contract mechanic was not removed, more options were given for purchasing faction mods. More options = good in most peoples book. In fact, the only reason to get so bent out of shape is if you were running scams. Not that running scams is a bad thing, but you could at least be honest about it. That way, you might be recognized as having a quasi-legitimate complain instead of being seen (correctly) as an amateur forum troll.
This man may be an idiot sometimes, but he is speaking the truth. If you are running contract scams, then say so, and we will have a little more understanding of why you are upset. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Fabulousli Obvious
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:36:00 -
[94] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote: Yes, I do swallow, and yes, it DOES make me hard.
You heard it here first folks, swallowing makes me hard.
I'm all ears ! Last words:-á Either that wallpaper goes, or I do. ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900 |

Whitehound
257
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:37:00 -
[95] - Quote
NosceTeIpsum wrote:This... is wrong.... We got SP because they said we were when they dropped the skills. No one "hated" the change mate, infact it was one of the nicest things CCP has done for the players in a long time, IE: Make skilling less time consuming. I have yet to meet someone that actually wants their learning skills back >.> No, it is not wrong. It is just one of many reasons. Also a lot did hate it. You must have missed quite a few threads if you think everyone loved it.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:37:00 -
[96] - Quote
I am not / was not running contract scams.
Even if I was it makes no difference. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
401
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:39:00 -
[97] - Quote
OP were you trying to run contract scams or not? If you weren't, you really really don't have any reason to complain. Like, seriously. CCP made things so much easier for you.
If you were trying to run contract scams, then that sucks that that was taken away. I really don't think CCP is going to refund your SP, but if they do that is cool of them.
You'll still have to find a new way to scam, though. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1806
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:39:00 -
[98] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Sorry my mistake, you must be one of the goon/devs who decide CCP policy. No, I'm one of the people telling you that you're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist. Nothing has changed, nothing has been removed, thus there is no reason for you to get any SP back. There is plenty of reason to have a closer look at those skills and consider what you can do with them, thoughGǪ You are bullying and belittling. If you have no function within CCP then telling any of THEIR customers that their problem is invalid isn't really helping the situation. If by bullying and belittling you mean factual and helpful, then sure. The contract mechanic was not removed, more options were given for purchasing faction mods. More options = good in most peoples book. In fact, the only reason to get so bent out of shape is if you were running scams. Not that running scams is a bad thing, but you could at least be honest about it. That way, you might be recognized as having a quasi-legitimate complain instead of being seen (correctly) as an amateur forum troll. This man may be an idiot sometimes, but he is speaking the truth. If you are running contract scams, then say so, and we will have a little more understanding of why you are upset.
Exactly, and furthermore you should... HEY, WAITAMINUITE..... When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:39:00 -
[99] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:This... is wrong.... We got SP because they said we were when they dropped the skills. No one "hated" the change mate, infact it was one of the nicest things CCP has done for the players in a long time, IE: Make skilling less time consuming. I have yet to meet someone that actually wants their learning skills back >.> No, it is not wrong. It is just one of many reasons. Also a lot did hate it. You must have missed quite a few threads if you think everyone loved it.
Sorry I tend to avoid whine threads.... I can't see why someone would want to spend even more time then they already are spending on skilling. Kinda baffles me... And yes I tend to avoid forums but... 3 years of playing... its something different lol |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6459
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:40:00 -
[100] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:So to sum up what you are saying:
1) My feelings as a customer don't matter 2) CCP says so No. What I'm saying is that
1) Nothing changed about contracts. 2) Therefore there is no reason to give you back your SP in contracting.
also
3) Maybe you should have a look at what you can do with said contracts so you don't feel like you've wasted the SP.
Whitehound wrote:No, it is not wrong. It is just one of many reasons. Also a lot did hate it. You must have missed quite a few threads if you think everyone loved it. Some people didn't like the removal of learning skills; I can't remember ever seeing anyone complaining about the SP reimbursement. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
401
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:40:00 -
[101] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am not / was not running contract scams.
Even if I was it makes no difference.
Then explain to us how the new system makes things difficult for you. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Whitehound
257
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:42:00 -
[102] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am not / was not running contract scams.
Even if I was it makes no difference. Then explain to us how the new system makes things difficult for you. Who says it does?
She invested time into skills which she no longer needs.
It is time for you to get your stick out of your arse.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:42:00 -
[103] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:So to sum up what you are saying:
1) My feelings as a customer don't matter 2) CCP says so No. What I'm saying is that 1) Nothing changed about contracts. 2) Therefore there is no reason to give you back your SP in contracting. also 3) Maybe you should have a look at what you can do with said contracts so you don't feel like you've wasted the SP. Whitehound wrote:No, it is not wrong. It is just one of many reasons. Also a lot did hate it. You must have missed quite a few threads if you think everyone loved it. Some people didn't like the removal of learning skills; I can't remember ever seeing anyone complaining about the SP reimbursement.
1) You are being ignorant of my feelings 2) You don't dictate CCP policies 3) The changed the game so much I don't want to do anything with contracts anymore thus why I want my SP back
|

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:43:00 -
[104] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am not / was not running contract scams.
Even if I was it makes no difference. Then explain to us how the new system makes things difficult for you.
Not difficult, I could do it. I don't want to. CCP changed things so much that I just don't want to be bothered with it anymore.
|

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:43:00 -
[105] - Quote
So you don't scam..... you just.... trained a random skill?????? And are now complaining about the amount of time you "lost" doing this....................... |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:45:00 -
[106] - Quote
NosceTeIpsum wrote:So you don't scam..... you just.... trained a random skill?????? And are now complaining about the amount of time you "lost" doing this.......................
I made a set of toons with very specific skills, very tightly trained to play the game in a certain way. CCP changed the rules to the game mid way through. I don't want to play that aspect of t the game anymore.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1806
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:46:00 -
[107] - Quote
NosceTeIpsum wrote:Whitehound wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:This... is wrong.... We got SP because they said we were when they dropped the skills. No one "hated" the change mate, infact it was one of the nicest things CCP has done for the players in a long time, IE: Make skilling less time consuming. I have yet to meet someone that actually wants their learning skills back >.> No, it is not wrong. It is just one of many reasons. Also a lot did hate it. You must have missed quite a few threads if you think everyone loved it. Sorry I tend to avoid whine threads.... I can't see why someone would want to spend even more time then they already are spending on skilling. Kinda baffles me... And yes I tend to avoid forums but... 3 years of playing... its something different lol
Well, there was a certain level of strategy in developing your skill plan that was lost when learning skills were removed. Not everyone was pleased with simplifying things in that regard.
That being said, once the decision was made to remove the mechanic... and admittedly it was a very popular decision.... then reimbursing people for the time invested via skill points was appropriate.
Now if the option to train learning skills had remained, but another new means of accelerating skill point accrual was introduced (say for example a boost for performing (grinding) certain tasks in game) along side the old system then no Skill Point reimbursement would have been necessary or appropriate. You could take advantage of either, or both, at your discretion. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
83
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:47:00 -
[108] - Quote
They changed loot drops and drone goo. I demand a refund on all of my SP for Combat ships, and related skills. Also transport, and salvage skills. And refining skills.
Also they removed the Cop look from my Comet, I demand to be refunded for my purchase, it's not the ship I had wanted.
Now if you'll excuse me, I need to empty my tear bucket.. |

Shaampoo
Epidemic. F0RCEFUL ENTRY
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:48:00 -
[109] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time. They didn't remove contracts from the game they added functionality to the game. I think you still can make contracts just not faction mods at a silly mark-up
|

Sobach
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
25
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:48:00 -
[110] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:So you don't scam..... you just.... trained a random skill?????? And are now complaining about the amount of time you "lost" doing this....................... I made a set of toons with very specific skills, very tightly trained to play the game in a certain way. CCP changed the rules to the game mid way through. I don't want to play that aspect of t the game anymore.
So your stance is that every time CCP rebalances/changes mechanics, they should refund everyone who's had any relevant skills trained?
really?
wow geez, I wonder what's gonna happen when CCP start implementing their shipline revamp, where they change EVERY SINGLE FKING SHIP IN THE GAME.
Please quit the game and let the door bash your face in multiple times on your way out. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:49:00 -
[111] - Quote
Shaampoo wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time. They didn't remove contracts from the game they added functionality to the game. I think you still can make contracts just not faction mods at a silly mark-up
Point is they changed the game and the reason for what I was doing. I am not asking for anything earth shattering. I just want the SP that i invested in being able to play the game the way I wanted to play it, back, that is all.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6460
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:51:00 -
[112] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:She invested time into skills which she no longer needs. Yeah, seeGǪ there's a difference between Gǣno longer needGǥ and Gǣcan no longer useGǥ. The former depends on player choice; the latter does not. The former will therefore not yield any kind of refund (because it's not their job to fix your choices), whereas the latter will (because it is their job to fix things they've decided).
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:1) You are being ignorant of my feelings 2) You don't dictate CCP policies 3) They changed the game so much I don't want to do anything with contracts anymore thus why I want my SP back Your feelings are quite irrelevant to the policy of reimbursement, yes. I don't dictate any policies GÇö I just explain them to you.
GǪand you see that word in your last point? GÇ£WantGÇ¥? That's why the problem doesn't actually exist: it's an issue that you have chosen to create for yourself (now that's a sandbox for you! ). CCP cannot fix your choices, nor should they. Your SP are not wasted GÇö they do exactly the same thing as before GÇö you just choose not to use them. At any point, you can choose to use them again. Nothing is lost; nothing is removed; no reason for a refund exists.
Quote:I am not asking for anything earth shattering. Actually, you are. Go look in the F&I and skill forums for all the threads about SP remapping. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:51:00 -
[113] - Quote
Sobach wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:So you don't scam..... you just.... trained a random skill?????? And are now complaining about the amount of time you "lost" doing this....................... I made a set of toons with very specific skills, very tightly trained to play the game in a certain way. CCP changed the rules to the game mid way through. I don't want to play that aspect of t the game anymore. So your stance is that every time CCP rebalances/changes mechanics, they should refund everyone who's had any relevant skills trained? really? wow geez, I wonder what's gonna happen when CCP start implementing their shipline revamp, where they change EVERY SINGLE FKING SHIP IN THE GAME. Please quit the game and let the door bash your face in multiple times on your way out.
I think everyone should have it refunded, yes. There is a marked difference between re-balancing a frigate class of ships versus a Titan. Clearly the time involved to get to a Titan is much greater and the SP not always transferable (i.e jump portal/doomsday weapons) Corporate Contracting is the same idea.
|

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:52:00 -
[114] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:So you don't scam..... you just.... trained a random skill?????? And are now complaining about the amount of time you "lost" doing this....................... I made a set of toons with very specific skills, very tightly trained to play the game in a certain way. CCP changed the rules to the game mid way through. I don't want to play that aspect of t the game anymore.
So do what everyone else does and find a new freakin different way. YOU chose to do that, knowing the risks, like EVERYONE ELSE that reads up on aspects of money making in EVE. Its not the company's fault if they are attempting to make the game a certain way. A good portion of time is spent reviewing and analyzing players feedback, suggestions and concerns.
My recommendation: Don't pick one thing...... its an ever changing game... if you have been here for that long you already know this. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1806
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:52:00 -
[115] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Shaampoo wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time. They didn't remove contracts from the game they added functionality to the game. I think you still can make contracts just not faction mods at a silly mark-up Point is they changed the game and the reason for what I was doing. I am not asking for anything earth shattering. I just want the SP that i invested in being able to play the game the way I wanted to play it, back, that is all.
You've had it explained why doing this in a case by case basis for each one of the multitude of changes CCP makes with every expansion is impractical... and frankly silly.
If you can't understand that, you'll just have to learn to live with disappointment. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

Whitehound
257
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:53:00 -
[116] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:No, it is not wrong. It is just one of many reasons. Also a lot did hate it. You must have missed quite a few threads if you think everyone loved it. Some people didn't like the removal of learning skills; I can't remember ever seeing anyone complaining about the SP reimbursement. People love getting SPs for when they put a lot of time into skills and these skills suddenly become useless to them.
Imagine training for Gallente ships and CCP decided to never fix Gallente. You sure would hate every skill point you ever put into it and eventually demand them back.
It is a completely valid claim the OP makes.
You just need to realized that your ignorance and arrogance is entirely selfish and that you do not post to help, but to establish a dominant position over other players in which you try to use the same attitude and to fix your lack of self-esteem. Try reaching out instead now and then - if you dare.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:54:00 -
[117] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:She invested time into skills which she no longer needs. Yeah, seeGǪ there's a difference between GÇ£no longer needGÇ¥ and GÇ£can no longer useGÇ¥. The former depends on player choice; the latter does not. The former will therefore not yield any kind of refund (because it's not their job to fix your choices), whereas the latter will (because it is their job to fix things they've decided). Gay Mafia Princess wrote:1) You are being ignorant of my feelings 2) You don't dictate CCP policies 3) They changed the game so much I don't want to do anything with contracts anymore thus why I want my SP back Your feelings are quite irrelevant to the policy of reimbursement, yes. I don't dictate any policies GÇö I just explain them to you. GǪand you see that word in your last point? GÇ£WantGÇ¥? That's why the problem doesn't actually exist: it's an issue that you have chosen to create for yourself (now that's a sandbox for you!  ). CCP cannot fix your choices, nor should they. Your SP are not wasted GÇö they do exactly the same thing as before GÇö you just choose not to use them. At any point, you can choose to use them again. Nothing is lost; nothing is removed; no reason for a refund exists. Quote:I am not asking for anything earth shattering. Actually, you are. Go look in the F&I and skill forums for all the threads about SP remapping.
I really think you are grasping for straws and maybe just maybe you should admit that you have no point.
I am a customer, customer is always right. Why? Because without customers there is no business.
|

Klown Walk
Black Rebel Rifter Club
82
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:55:00 -
[118] - Quote
I want my missile skills back because I never use them. |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:57:00 -
[119] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:Whitehound wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:This... is wrong.... We got SP because they said we were when they dropped the skills. No one "hated" the change mate, infact it was one of the nicest things CCP has done for the players in a long time, IE: Make skilling less time consuming. I have yet to meet someone that actually wants their learning skills back >.> No, it is not wrong. It is just one of many reasons. Also a lot did hate it. You must have missed quite a few threads if you think everyone loved it. Sorry I tend to avoid whine threads.... I can't see why someone would want to spend even more time then they already are spending on skilling. Kinda baffles me... And yes I tend to avoid forums but... 3 years of playing... its something different lol Well, there was a certain level of strategy in developing your skill plan that was lost when learning skills were removed. Not everyone was pleased with simplifying things in that regard. That being said, once the decision was made to remove the mechanic... and admittedly it was a very popular decision.... then reimbursing people for the time invested via skill points was appropriate. Now if the option to train learning skills had remained, but another new means of accelerating skill point accrual was introduced (say for example a boost for performing (grinding) certain tasks in game) along side the old system then no Skill Point reimbursement would have been necessary or appropriate. You could take advantage of either, or both, at your discretion.
Well said mate. But I think everyone here can agree that one of our main reasons for staying here is the complete lack of "grinding". And no I don't mean money or anything else like that, just skills wise. Being able to PLAY the game is quite comforting to say the least. And I think alot of people would agree with that observation. |

Whitehound
258
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:57:00 -
[120] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Yeah, seeGǪ there's a difference between Gǣno longer needGǥ and Gǣcan no longer useGǥ. But for whom? For you, just not for her. Again you argue completely selfish. No one cares about you, Tippia.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1809
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:57:00 -
[121] - Quote
Quote:I am a customer, customer is always right. Why? Because without customers there is no business.
Urban myths are cute. 
Retaining bad customers that demand impractical changes and special treatment is, generally speaking, bad for business. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:58:00 -
[122] - Quote
Klown Walk wrote:I want my missile sp back because I never use them.
That would be up to CCP. but why shouldn't they really? You probably had no idea what they were about when you started the game. why are people being penalized for CCP not explaining the game and for changing the game as they go along?
|

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:59:00 -
[123] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Quote:I am a customer, customer is always right. Why? Because without customers there is no business. Urban myths are cute.  Retaining bad customers that demand impractical changes and special treatment is, generally speaking, bad for business.
I am guessing you are hinting at the 80/20 rule here? I would say my issue is easily resolved.
|

Whitehound
258
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:59:00 -
[124] - Quote
Klown Walk wrote:I want my missile sp back because I never use them. Whose fault is it?
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Sid Hudgens
Totally not an NPC Corp
69
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 23:59:00 -
[125] - Quote
Yes. I want what the OP wants.
Also I want refunds for scrapmetal processing 4 and all of it's pre-reqs.
And I want to be refunded all game time I spent grinding up standings for research agents.
And all game time that I spent daydreaming about shooting frigates in my titan that I was gonna train for.
And of course a pony.
If all of these demands are not met I am quitting EVE and donating all of my isk and items to the mittani legal defense fund. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |

Shian Yang
84
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:00:00 -
[126] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:1) You are being ignorant of my feelings 2) You don't dictate CCP policies 3) They changed the game so much I don't want to do anything with contracts anymore thus why I want my SP back
Greetings capsuleer,
If you want input from CCP I would suggest you send them a direct petition. It would certainly mean we won't have to see the anguished weeping you are spilling over the forums over what is, fundamentally, a non-issue and you will get an official answer.
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:00:00 -
[127] - Quote
Well said mate. But I think everyone here can agree that one of our main reasons for staying here is the complete lack of "grinding". And no I don't mean money or anything else like that, just skills wise. Being able to PLAY the game is quite comforting to say the least. And I think alot of people would agree with that observation.
Grinding is a state of mind. I may not have to keep killing boars to get SP but I can assure you I will be bored waiting for the SP to train.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4144
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:01:00 -
[128] - Quote
yo sup OP you should stop by the TOS sometime
Quote:CCP MAY FIND IT NECESSARY ON OCCASION TO MAKE CHANGES TO OR RESET CERTAIN PARAMETERS OF THE PERSISTENT GAME WORLD MECHANICS, INTERFACE OR FEATURES OF EVE ONLINE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN GAME BALANCE AND ENHANCE PLAYABILITY OR PERFORMANCE FOR ITS SUBSCRIBERS. THESE CHANGES MAY AFFECT OR CAUSE SETBACKS FOR THE CHARACTERS YOUGÇÖVE CREATED.
hope this has enlightened you some well bye "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:01:00 -
[129] - Quote
Sid Hudgens wrote:Yes. I want what the OP wants.
Also I want refunds for scrapmetal processing 4 and all of it's pre-reqs.
And I want to be refunded all game time I spent grinding up standings for research agents.
And all game time that I spent daydreaming about shooting frigates in my titan that I was gonna train for.
And of course a pony.
If all of these demands are not met I am quitting EVE and donating all of my isk and items to the mittani legal defense fund.
I don't know if you are being serious or not but if you are please don't quit and stay and help in the fight.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1809
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:02:00 -
[130] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:Yeah, seeGǪ there's a difference between Gǣno longer needGǥ and Gǣcan no longer useGǥ. But for whom? For you, just not for her. Again you argue completely selfish. No one cares about you, Tippia.
You know, you often make fairly good posts... but in any thread where Tippia makes a post you kinda go overboard trying to out rebuttal him/her, and often take stances that seem to be out of character compared to your posts in other threads.
Not an attack, just an observation. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:03:00 -
[131] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:
Well said mate. But I think everyone here can agree that one of our main reasons for staying here is the complete lack of "grinding". And no I don't mean money or anything else like that, just skills wise. Being able to PLAY the game is quite comforting to say the least. And I think alot of people would agree with that observation.
Grinding is a state of mind. I may not have to keep killing boars to get SP but I can assure you I will be bored waiting for the SP to train.
Then watch movie, go out with friends or play a different game, it works for the thousands of other players that play this game. Derp |

Xavier Bandar
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:04:00 -
[132] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am a customer, customer is always right.
The customer is definitely not always right (the person who invented that saying should be shot in the face) and I'm pretty sure more than one waiter has put his **** in your drink because he agrees with that sentiment. |

Shian Yang
84
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:04:00 -
[133] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I don't know if you are being serious or not but if you are please don't quit and stay and help in the fight.
Greetings capsuleer,
Was the pony not enough of a hint?
Regards,
Shian Yang
|

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:05:00 -
[134] - Quote
Andski wrote:yo sup OP you should stop by the TOS sometime Quote:CCP MAY FIND IT NECESSARY ON OCCASION TO MAKE CHANGES TO OR RESET CERTAIN PARAMETERS OF THE PERSISTENT GAME WORLD MECHANICS, INTERFACE OR FEATURES OF EVE ONLINE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN GAME BALANCE AND ENHANCE PLAYABILITY OR PERFORMANCE FOR ITS SUBSCRIBERS. THESE CHANGES MAY AFFECT OR CAUSE SETBACKS FOR THE CHARACTERS YOUGÇÖVE CREATED. hope this has enlightened you some well bye
Omfg its in the fine writing....... what a cowinkidink O.o Again... derp |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:05:00 -
[135] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I don't know if you are being serious or not but if you are please don't quit and stay and help in the fight. Greetings capsuleer, Was the pony not enough of a hint? Regards, Shian Yang
Could have been a wry sense of humour. *shrug*
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6461
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:06:00 -
[136] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:People love getting SPs for when they put a lot of time into skills and these skills suddenly become useless to them. GǪand again, there is a difference between actually useless and choosing not to use a skill. The learning skills were a case of the former, the OP's complaint is a case of the latter.
Quote:Imagine training for Gallente ships and CCP decided to never fix Gallente. You sure would hate every skill point you ever put into it and eventually demand them back. Nope. I chose to train them. I accept that choice, and as long as I can fly the ships, I got what I trained for. It's also a pretty bad example since it has nothing to do with the OP's whining.
Quote:It is a completely valid claim the OP makes. No it isn't. He wants SP remaps GÇö he wants to be absolved from any responsibility for his own decision and choices. Now that he has decided that he no longer wants to use this category of skills, he wants the SP back, not because the skills aren't working, but because he wants to do something else. Well, guess what: he can already do something else, and the skills can still do what they always did. There is no reason for CCP to give him more time than he has paid for.
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am a customer, customer is always right. No. No, they're not. They're actually quite frequently very very wrong. Like you, who want to others to fix a problem that you have created for yourself. It's a bit like if you threw your dog down the garbage chute and then blamed the kennel (because they sold you the dog) GÇö you were their customer and you are quite wrong in your complaint. The problem is one you cause and one you can solve by simply going down to the garbage room and retrieve your poor dog.
Whitehound wrote:But for whom? For everyone, since the mechanics are applied equally to everyone. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1809
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:06:00 -
[137] - Quote
Andski wrote:yo sup OP you should stop by the TOS sometime Quote:CCP MAY FIND IT NECESSARY ON OCCASION TO MAKE CHANGES TO OR RESET CERTAIN PARAMETERS OF THE PERSISTENT GAME WORLD MECHANICS, INTERFACE OR FEATURES OF EVE ONLINE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN GAME BALANCE AND ENHANCE PLAYABILITY OR PERFORMANCE FOR ITS SUBSCRIBERS. THESE CHANGES MAY AFFECT OR CAUSE SETBACKS FOR THE CHARACTERS YOUGÇÖVE CREATED. hope this has enlightened you some well bye
You beat me to it. 
But thank you for effectively ending this train wreck of a thread.  When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:06:00 -
[138] - Quote
NosceTeIpsum wrote:Andski wrote:yo sup OP you should stop by the TOS sometime Quote:CCP MAY FIND IT NECESSARY ON OCCASION TO MAKE CHANGES TO OR RESET CERTAIN PARAMETERS OF THE PERSISTENT GAME WORLD MECHANICS, INTERFACE OR FEATURES OF EVE ONLINE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN GAME BALANCE AND ENHANCE PLAYABILITY OR PERFORMANCE FOR ITS SUBSCRIBERS. THESE CHANGES MAY AFFECT OR CAUSE SETBACKS FOR THE CHARACTERS YOUGÇÖVE CREATED. hope this has enlightened you some well bye Omfg its in the fine writing....... what a cowinkidink O.o Again... derp
This has all the signs of an unhealthy codependent relationship. OMG maybe we should try to right this wrong.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6462
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:07:00 -
[139] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Klown Walk wrote:I want my missile sp back because I never use them. Whose fault is it? Klown's, obviously, much like the OP's decision not to use the skills he trained for is the OP's fault.
Ranger 1 wrote:You know, you often make fairly good posts... but in any thread where Tippia makes a post you kinda go overboard trying to out rebuttal him/her, and often take stances that seem to be out of character compared to your posts in other threads.
Not an attack, just an observation. It's because he doesn't like how I define passive tanking. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:10:00 -
[140] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:Klown Walk wrote:I want my missile sp back because I never use them. Whose fault is it? Klown's, obviously, much like the OP's decision not to use the skills he trained for is the OP's fault.
You miss the point entirely.
|

Whitehound
259
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:10:00 -
[141] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:You know, ... Shut it. Anyone who starts a comment with "You know" is a fool. Do not try to make me care for you. 
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:10:00 -
[142] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:Andski wrote:yo sup OP you should stop by the TOS sometime Quote:CCP MAY FIND IT NECESSARY ON OCCASION TO MAKE CHANGES TO OR RESET CERTAIN PARAMETERS OF THE PERSISTENT GAME WORLD MECHANICS, INTERFACE OR FEATURES OF EVE ONLINE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN GAME BALANCE AND ENHANCE PLAYABILITY OR PERFORMANCE FOR ITS SUBSCRIBERS. THESE CHANGES MAY AFFECT OR CAUSE SETBACKS FOR THE CHARACTERS YOUGÇÖVE CREATED. hope this has enlightened you some well bye Omfg its in the fine writing....... what a cowinkidink O.o Again... derp This has all the signs of an unhealthy codependent relationship. OMG maybe we should try to right this wrong.
Or maybe you should stop skipping your Economics and English Classes... You might actually see things like this. ^_- |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:11:00 -
[143] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:You know, ... Shut it. Anyone who starts a comment with "You know" is a fool. Do not try to make me care for you. 
I'm still attempting to care for your posts..... still not.... really trying here though |

Sobach
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
25
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:12:00 -
[144] - Quote
NosceTeIpsum wrote:Whitehound wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:You know, ... Shut it. Anyone who starts a comment with "You know" is a fool. Do not try to make me care for you.  I'm still attempting to care for your posts..... still not.... really trying here though
it's just whitehound being whitehound |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1810
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:13:00 -
[145] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:You know, ... Shut it. Anyone who starts a comment with "You know" is a fool. Do not try to make me care for you. 
Aww c'mon, you know you like me.  When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:14:00 -
[146] - Quote
Sobach wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:Whitehound wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:You know, ... Shut it. Anyone who starts a comment with "You know" is a fool. Do not try to make me care for you.  I'm still attempting to care for your posts..... still not.... really trying here though it's just whitehound being whitehound
But.... its so bad... |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:14:00 -
[147] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Whitehound wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:You know, ... Shut it. Anyone who starts a comment with "You know" is a fool. Do not try to make me care for you.  Aww c'mon, you know you like me. 
I can also kill you with my brain =P |

Whitehound
260
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:17:00 -
[148] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪand again, there is a difference between actually useless and choosing not to use a skill. No. It is only for you a difference and because you are being selfish. Does a white umbrella protect better from rain than a black one does? I doubt it, yet they are different. A difference sometimes does not matter and is only a difference.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:17:00 -
[149] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1262521#post1262521
Just edited my post that was right underneath the OP so no one will bother to read this mess of a thread. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:21:00 -
[150] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1262521#post1262521
Just edited my post that was right underneath the OP so no one will bother to read this mess of a thread.
Why are you insisting that I am scamming? Do you have any proof? Amazed that the biggest scam alliance in the game is telling me I am scamming when I am not.
|

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:23:00 -
[151] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1262521#post1262521
Just edited my post that was right underneath the OP so no one will bother to read this mess of a thread. Why are you insisting that I am scamming? Do you have any proof? Amazed that the biggest scam alliance in the game is telling me I am scamming when I am not.
You should REALLY take those English classes..... |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:24:00 -
[152] - Quote
NosceTeIpsum wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1262521#post1262521
Just edited my post that was right underneath the OP so no one will bother to read this mess of a thread. Why are you insisting that I am scamming? Do you have any proof? Amazed that the biggest scam alliance in the game is telling me I am scamming when I am not. You should REALLY take those English classes.....
Not everyone speaks english as a first language in the world you know.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6462
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:26:00 -
[153] - Quote
Incorrect.
GÇ£UselessGÇ¥ means the skill cannot be used even if you want to. GÇ£Choosing not to use itGÇ¥ means it can be used, but you don't want to.
The two are pretty much each other's exact opposites. There is also (at least) a third category, which led up to the learning skill changeGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Patrick Estemaire
EVE University Ivy League
11
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:27:00 -
[154] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1262521#post1262521
Just edited my post that was right underneath the OP so no one will bother to read this mess of a thread.
Thanks for the time you just saved me.
|

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:28:00 -
[155] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1262521#post1262521
Just edited my post that was right underneath the OP so no one will bother to read this mess of a thread. Why are you insisting that I am scamming? Do you have any proof? Amazed that the biggest scam alliance in the game is telling me I am scamming when I am not. You should REALLY take those English classes..... Not everyone speaks english as a first language in the world you know.
Totally missed the point.... |

Whitehound
260
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:41:00 -
[156] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Incorrect. GǣUselessGǥ means the skill cannot be used even if you want to. GǣChoosing not to use itGǥ means it can be used, but you don't want to. The two are pretty much each other's exact opposites. There is also (at least) a third category, which led up to the learning skill changeGǪ No, it is irrelevant. Stop trying to win an argument, which you have already lost the moment you started looking for reasons. One can give SPs for any reason or no reason at all.
It is just nice when it is plausible, but really, you only have to accept it. Then making it plausible helps CCP with shutting you up or they might not hear the end of you.
Harden up.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6463
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:47:00 -
[157] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No, it is irrelevant. Nope. It actually matters a whole lot, since skills being rendered useless makes them a candidate for reimbursement, whereas people choosing to do something that does not involve the skills they've trained rather disqualifies them for any such treatment.
Quote:One can give SPs for any reason or no reason at all. GǪand the policy is that without a good reason, none will be given (just like with all reimbursements). Choosing not to use a skill is not a good reason for SP reimbursement, just like a ship gathering dust in your hangar is not a good reason for getting it reimbursed.
I agree, the OP needs to HTFU and accept the choices he made.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
1618
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:52:00 -
[158] - Quote
I wan't the OP to be banned permanantly from the forums. I guess we all don't get what we want though...oh well. EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! |

Whitehound
260
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:53:00 -
[159] - Quote
Tippia wrote:... It actually matters a whole lot ... Yes, to you. Again, just one of your selfish rants where you try to find reasons to close your eyes. I have seen your comments long enough now. You always want reasons like you are CCP. 
If you want to help then tell the OP how she can use the skills she trained to make ISKs. She had planned to use corporation contracts to make ISKs with shiny modules. How can she now use the skills to achieve the same after the change?
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Shian Yang
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:57:00 -
[160] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:If you want to help then tell the OP how she can use the skills she trained to make ISKs. She had planned to use corporation contracts to make ISKs with shiny modules. How can she now use the skills to achieve the same after the change?
Greetings capsuleer,
The same way as before; using Contracts. The market is only an additional option.
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6463
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:01:00 -
[161] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Yes, to you. GǪand to everyone else, since the mechanics affect everyone equally.
Quote:If you want to help then tell the OP how she can use the skills she trained to make ISKs. The problem with that is that he seems quite disinclined to describe why he needs them to begin with and how anything has changed with this non-changeGǪ
Also, yoink. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:01:00 -
[162] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote: Greetings capsuleer,
The same way as before; using Contracts. The market is only an additional option.
Regards,
Shian Yang
No. The contract market is breaking away. Shiny mods are now traded over the normal market.
If I am not mistaken then CCP did this on purpose, because the contract market was somehow wrong. CCP has forgotten about the players who helped themselves by training corporation contracts to solve the issue and now with the change got help, but also have spend time in skills they now no longer need.
A very easy to understand argumentation. You have to be really really stupid to not see this. Or a douche.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:06:00 -
[163] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Shian Yang wrote: Greetings capsuleer,
The same way as before; using Contracts. The market is only an additional option.
Regards,
Shian Yang
No. The contract market is breaking away. Shiny mods are now traded over the normal market. If I am not mistaken then CCP did this on purpose, because the contract market was somehow wrong. CCP has forgotten about the players who helped themselves and trained corporation contracts to solve the issue and now with the change got help, but also have spend time in skills they now no longer need. A very easy to understand argumentation. You have to be really really stupid to not see this. Or a douche.
Your arguement is invalid..... This is just like saying: "I spent time training up Carriers, but now they nerfed/changed them, so I want my SP back" Its the same exact arguement just a different skill. Tip's point is perfectly valid, your apperently to ignorant to see the comparision. |

Nemesis Factor
Clann Fian Noir. Mercenary Group
46
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:11:00 -
[164] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Shian Yang wrote: Greetings capsuleer,
The same way as before; using Contracts. The market is only an additional option.
Regards,
Shian Yang
No. The contract market is breaking away. Shiny mods are now traded over the normal market. If I am not mistaken then CCP did this on purpose, because the contract market was somehow wrong. CCP has forgotten about the players who helped themselves by training corporation contracts to solve the issue and now with the change got help, but also have spend time in skills they now no longer need. Some might now need to train extra trading skills on top. A very easy to understand argumentation. You have to be really really stupid to not see this. Or a douche.
So you think we should be refunded on skills we don't need anymore? |

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:12:00 -
[165] - Quote
NosceTeIpsum wrote:Your arguement is invalid..... This is just like saying: "I spent time training up Carriers, but now they nerfed/changed them, so I want my SP back" Its the same exact arguement just a different skill. Tip's point is perfectly valid, your apperently to ignorant to see the comparision. No, the argument is valid. Players have trained these skills and CCP in some way admitted that the contract market is broken. So why do they only fix the market but do not turn the contract skills of these players into more trading skills? Some will need to train more skills to set up enough orders now.
When CCP dropped learning skills did they not only drop them, but they increased the attributes. Nothing changed there. Why did it need SPs? It did not. We could have moved on without them. I simply had more SPs after the removal and to stick into somewhere else while I kept my training speed. I had no loss but got a bonus!
So whatever reason you have is irrelevant. The claim is valid and good.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6463
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:14:00 -
[166] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No. The contract market is breaking away. Shiny mods are now traded over the normal market. GǪwhich doesn't preclude the OP from using contracts to make money.
Quote:If I am not mistaken then CCP did this on purpose, because the contract market was somehow wrong. You are indeed mistaken. CCP did this on purpose, because they wanted to be able to track the prices of higher-meta modules with their standard market-data collection tools and feed that data into the new wardec, killmail, and inventory UIs. As an added bonus, it also made the market more consistent (since faction ships and ammo already existed on the market) and logical, and it also made trading with these items more efficient.
The contract market, on the other hand, remains exactly the same as before.
Quote:No, the argument is valid. Players have trained these skills and CCP in some way admitted that the contract market is broken No they didn't GÇö thus invalid. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Nephilius
Knights of Athena Star Council
402
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:14:00 -
[167] - Quote
I want my virginity back. My first time was underwhelming and over rather fast. Now that I am older, I can make it so worth giving away now! To call me a Carebear is a misnomer...while it is true that I am hairy like a bear (or two russian women), I really don't care.-á Like, at all.-á Call me an Apathybear.-á Just don't call if you need assistance. |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:14:00 -
[168] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:Yes, to you. GǪand to everyone else, since the mechanics affect everyone equally. Quote:If you want to help then tell the OP how she can use the skills she trained to make ISKs. The problem with that is that he seems quite disinclined to describe why he needs them to begin with and how anything has changed with this non-changeGǪ Also, yoink.
"The problem with that is that he seems quite disinclined to describe why he needs them to begin with and how anything has changed with this non-changeGǪ"
This would make the whole problem 5000 times easier to solve. The fact that the OP refuses to state what she is specificly is doing: 1: in order to make ISK 2: how this "change' will affect her ISK flow using said skills
Stats help too The fact that there is absolutely NO MENTION of what they are doing and how they are using the skill just shows everyone else around them that they are a moron.
|

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:20:00 -
[169] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:Your arguement is invalid..... This is just like saying: "I spent time training up Carriers, but now they nerfed/changed them, so I want my SP back" Its the same exact arguement just a different skill. Tip's point is perfectly valid, your apperently to ignorant to see the comparision. No, the argument is valid. Players have trained these skills and CCP in some way admitted that the contract market is broken. So why do they only fix the market but do not turn the contract skills of these players into more trading skills? Some will need to train more skills to set up enough orders now. When CCP dropped learning skills did they not only drop them, but they increased the attributes. Nothing changed there. Why did it need SPs? It did not. We could have moved on without them. I simply had more SPs after the removal and to stick into somewhere else while I kept my training speed. I had no loss but got a bonus! So whatever reason you have is irrelevant. The claim is valid and good.
Now your jumping down their throats assuming that the contract system is going to remain the same indefinately. THAT is my point right there. You are jumping to a conclusion that isn't a conclusion. You don't freaking know. For all we know its in the works. There is NO REASON currently that CCP should hand out free SP to everyone. IF you have proof that the Contracts are remaining the same then post it other, I again say, your arguement is invalid. Do your damn homework ffs.... |

Shian Yang
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:33:00 -
[170] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No. The contract market is breaking away. Shiny mods are now traded over the normal market.
Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
Can you still trade those modules through a Contract?
Regards,
Shian Yang
|

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:36:00 -
[171] - Quote
Nemesis Factor wrote:So you think we should be refunded on skills we don't need anymore? No, this is not what I am saying. What I am saying is that if a game change makes part of your skill training obsolete then it can be discussed to reimburse them. If it is technically doable, if the effort to organize a reimbursement is worth it, is a different matter. In this case did CCP more or less admit that there is something wrong with contracts and their reason to put them into the normal market.
I believe they should have given all players, who trained skills to set up many contracts, the option to turn these skills into market orders. When CCP moves these items to the normal market then they should have move the traders, too, or at least offered them the option to move with it.
Imagine what would happen if CCP decided to switch the weapon bonuses of Amarr and Gallente ships around, but left your gunnery skills untouched? You would have to fly Amarr ships with hyrbid weapons and gallente ships with lasers. You could still use your weapons, right? But it would suck for those players who did not train both weapon types. According to Tippia would this be completely acceptable and she would find reasons why the ships are in fact better with the change.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:42:00 -
[172] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote:Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
Can you still trade those modules through a Contract?
Regards,
Shian Yang
No. Who is still looking at contracts?
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
401
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:44:00 -
[173] - Quote
OP will have to find some new way to scam. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Shian Yang
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:45:00 -
[174] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Shian Yang wrote:Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
Can you still trade those modules through a Contract?
Regards,
Shian Yang
No. Who is still looking at contracts?
Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
That is a blatant lie.
You can still trade these items through Contracts.
Even in The Forge region they are traded through Contract. At least hey were approximately 16 hours ago when one of my co-pilots bid on a few of those contracts, set up a few for purchasing and offered a number for sale.
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:45:00 -
[175] - Quote
Tippia wrote:You are indeed mistaken. CCP did this on purpose, because they wanted to be able to track the prices of higher-meta modules with their standard market-data collection tools and feed that data into the new wardec, killmail, and inventory UIs. As an added bonus, it also made the market more consistent (since faction ships and ammo already existed on the market) and logical, and it also made trading with these items more efficient. Ah, so CCP forgot about the players who trade with these items per contract. I see.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:47:00 -
[176] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote:That is a blatant lie.
You can still trade these items through Contracts.
Even in The Forge region they are traded through Contract. At least hey were approximately 16 hours ago when one of my co-pilots bid on a few of those contracts, set up a few for purchasing and offered a number for sale.
Regards,
Shian Yang Nobody does. The market is breaking away and everyone is going to the much more convenient market orders. Contracts are also know for scams and kept people away.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6465
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:47:00 -
[177] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No, this is not what I am saying. GǪbut that is what the OP is saying.
Quote:What I am saying is that if a game change makes part of your skill training obsolete then it can be discussed to reimburse them. GǪand when that happens, maybe they will. What the OP is describing isn't it, though GÇö his skill training isn't obsolete; he just don't want to use it any more. A far better candidate would the the upcoming simplifications of the T2 ship prerequisite tree, but even then, chances are that no-one will get any SP back, because it's still a matter of people choosing not to make use of the skills they've trained than the skills actually being obsolete.
Quote:Imagine what would happen if CCP decided to switch the weapon bonuses of Amarr and Gallente ships around, but left your gunnery skills untouched? You would have to fly Amarr ships with hyrbid weapons and gallente ships with lasers. You could still use your weapons, right? But it would suck for those players who did not train both weapon types. According to Tippia would this be completely acceptable and she would find reasons why the ships are in fact better with the change. That would all depend on what reasons they gave for the change (and for not doing a skill swap at the same time). What you're describing isn't nearly equivalent to what's happening here, though. You're describing an actual, very large and sweeping mechanics change GÇö not a player choosing not to use his skills any more.
Whitehound wrote:Ah, so CCP forgot about the players who trade with these items per contract. I see. No. Those players can now trade with these items on the market as well as on contracts. As an added bonus, they can now have more open trades going on than before. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Serge Bastana
GWA Corp Unified Church of the Unobligated
446
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:48:00 -
[178] - Quote
Did CCP remove contracts from the game? No! Did CCP prevent those modules from being sold on contract? No!.
Argument therefore invalid. WoW holds your hand until end game, and gives you a cookie whether you win or lose. EVE not only takes your cookie, but laughs at you for bringing one in the first place... |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
401
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:49:00 -
[179] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:OP will have to find some new way to scam.
OP will have to find a new way to scam, and will have to find something else to whine about getting her SP back for. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:51:00 -
[180] - Quote
NosceTeIpsum wrote:Now your jumping down their throats assuming that the contract system is going to remain the same indefinately. THAT is my point right there. You are jumping to a conclusion that isn't a conclusion. You don't freaking know. For all we know its in the works. There is NO REASON currently that CCP should hand out free SP to everyone. IF you have proof that the Contracts are remaining the same then post it other, I again say, your arguement is invalid. Do your damn homework ffs.... So what can you offer other than a vague future and a tear on homework?
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Shian Yang
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:54:00 -
[181] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Shian Yang wrote:That is a blatant lie.
You can still trade these items through Contracts.
Even in The Forge region they are traded through Contract. At least hey were approximately 16 hours ago when one of my co-pilots bid on a few of those contracts, set up a few for purchasing and offered a number for sale.
Regards,
Shian Yang Nobody does. The market is breaking away and everyone is going to the much more convenient market orders. Contracts are also know for scams and kept people away.
Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
Repeating the same lies will not validate your point.
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:00:00 -
[182] - Quote
Tippia wrote:No. Those players can now trade with these items on the market as well as on contracts. As an added bonus, they can now have more open trades going on than before. No. There will be not more trades. The number of players did not grow nor are there now more items to trade with. The market is split into two. What is the benefit if this? It has gotten more messy.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:02:00 -
[183] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote: Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
Repeating the same lies will not validate your point.
Regards,
Shian Yang
I then suggest you stop repeating them. And get yourself checked for narcissism.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Shian Yang
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:06:00 -
[184] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:I then suggest you stop repeating them. And get yourself checked for narcissism.
Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
Why should I have myself checked when you are deliberately lying to and misleading other capsuleers? I am specifically referring to this:
"Nobody does."
There are contracts for those items. Somebody does.
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:08:00 -
[185] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote:Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
Why should I have myself checked when you are deliberately lying to and misleading other capsuleers? I am specifically referring to this:
"Nobody does."
There are contracts for those items. Somebody does.
Regards,
Shian Yang It is called "narcissism". Get your injection.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6467
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:11:00 -
[186] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No. There will be not more trades. So? They can still have more open trades going than before, because that's one of the mechanical differences between the two markets.
Quote:What is the benefit if this? The benefit is that the market becomes more efficient, more consistent, and more logical (and it has additional benefits outside of the market as well). It also allows for a much clearer distinction between different trading use cases, removing the mess and inconsistency that was the mix-and-match between what items could randomly be sold where for no apparent reason (although there's admittedly a fair amount of stuff that remains to be done in that area). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:14:00 -
[187] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:Now your jumping down their throats assuming that the contract system is going to remain the same indefinately. THAT is my point right there. You are jumping to a conclusion that isn't a conclusion. You don't freaking know. For all we know its in the works. There is NO REASON currently that CCP should hand out free SP to everyone. IF you have proof that the Contracts are remaining the same then post it other, I again say, your arguement is invalid. Do your damn homework ffs.... So what can you offer other than a vague future and a tear on homework?
Reason, something you are obviously lacking. I am looking at the current facts. You are basing your ideals on the wild illusion that CCP doesn't fix problems. Its not a "vague" future. CCP doesn't have to throw every little development idea or workings at the population of players. Its a waste of both our time and theirs. When something is done or close to completion OR mid way, they announce it. They will let us know if this current "problem" is fixed in time. That fact that people are this impatient sickens me. All you have shown is that your a bigot, incapable of seeing the bigger picture. |

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:18:00 -
[188] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:No. There will be not more trades. So? They can still have more open trades going than before, because that's one of the mechanical differences between the two markets. Quote:What is the benefit if this? The benefit is that the market becomes more efficient, more consistent, and more logical (and it has additional benefits outside of the market as well). It also allows for a much clearer distinction between different trading use cases, removing the mess and inconsistency that was the mix-and-match between what items could randomly be sold where for no apparent reason (although there's admittedly a fair amount of stuff that remains to be done in that area). Open trades are dead trades. With market buy orders do I not have to put all the ISKs up for example. Market orders are simply better.
And please give some examples of these benefits. It sounds somewhat hypothetical the way you describe it. I am sure everyone would love to know how they can still profit from the contract skills after the change.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
261
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:20:00 -
[189] - Quote
NosceTeIpsum wrote:All you have shown is that your a bigot, incapable of seeing the bigger picture. Yes, some first tears in this thread. It was about friggin' time!!!
PS: Going to bed. Thanks.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Oberus MacKenzie
Handsome Millionaire Playboys Flatline.
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:23:00 -
[190] - Quote
First off, there are as many "injections" for clinical narcissism as there are reasons to suspect it of Yang. FYI, that is 0.
More to the point, this has IMPROVED the market, not nerfed it. Contracts was one giant mess of scams and individual modules thrown up into a system that was too easily manipulated by an individual person. Many of the modules restricted to the contracts system had their pricing controlled by an individual or small group of players. A lot like the tech moons... **nudges CCP** Putting those individual items into the market (where pricing can be tracked, by the way) makes the contracts system cleaner and more appropriate for its original purpose: to sell groups of items as one unit. This is also an obvious piece of CCP's plan to widen the ISK sink involving taxes and pull ISK out of the game before the economy completely collapses.
The skillpoints aren't useless. Use them to create contracts for your alliance. That's what they were for in the first place. |

NosceTeIpsum
Cult of Escobar
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:27:00 -
[191] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:All you have shown is that your a bigot, incapable of seeing the bigger picture. Yes, some first tears in this thread. It was about friggin' time!!! PS: Going to bed. Thanks.
Delusional too... sad |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6467
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:31:00 -
[192] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Open trades are dead trades. No, open trades are active. Having more of them available is good, because you can react to the market that much faster.
Quote:With market buy orders do I not have to put all the ISKs up for example. Market orders are simply better. They are better for one type of trading; contracts are better for a different kind. Someone who used to only be able to trade on one of those markets can now trade on both and gain the benefits of both.
Quote:And please give some examples of these benefits. You mean the benefits I just listed? Yes, they are some examples of benefitsGǪ that's why I listed them.
Quote:I am sure everyone would love to know how they can still profit from the contract skills after the change. By selling things through contracts, obviously.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Shian Yang
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:56:00 -
[193] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:PS: Going to bed. Thanks.
Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
So this was all trolling? I will be sending you a contract for reimbursement of my time.
Regards,
Shian Yang
|

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 03:30:00 -
[194] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:And please give some examples of these benefits. It sounds somewhat hypothetical the way you describe it. I am sure everyone would love to know how they can still profit from the contract skills after the change. Selling fitted ships to your alliance/corporation in war zones for a pretty profit. The GoonSwarm Federation takes advantage of this at a station wherever we are basing out of. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
137
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 03:35:00 -
[195] - Quote
NosceTeIpsum wrote:Whitehound wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:Now your jumping down their throats assuming that the contract system is going to remain the same indefinately. THAT is my point right there. You are jumping to a conclusion that isn't a conclusion. You don't freaking know. For all we know its in the works. There is NO REASON currently that CCP should hand out free SP to everyone. IF you have proof that the Contracts are remaining the same then post it other, I again say, your arguement is invalid. Do your damn homework ffs.... So what can you offer other than a vague future and a tear on homework? Reason, something you are obviously lacking. I am looking at the current facts. You are basing your ideals on the wild illusion that CCP doesn't fix problems. Its not a "vague" future. CCP doesn't have to throw every little development idea or workings at the population of players. Its a waste of both our time and theirs. When something is done or close to completion OR mid way, they announce it. They will let us know if this current "problem" is fixed in time. That fact that people are this impatient sickens me. All you have shown is that your a bigot, incapable of seeing the bigger picture.
So how about those tech moons? |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
403
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 03:58:00 -
[196] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:Whitehound wrote:NosceTeIpsum wrote:Now your jumping down their throats assuming that the contract system is going to remain the same indefinately. THAT is my point right there. You are jumping to a conclusion that isn't a conclusion. You don't freaking know. For all we know its in the works. There is NO REASON currently that CCP should hand out free SP to everyone. IF you have proof that the Contracts are remaining the same then post it other, I again say, your arguement is invalid. Do your damn homework ffs.... So what can you offer other than a vague future and a tear on homework? Reason, something you are obviously lacking. I am looking at the current facts. You are basing your ideals on the wild illusion that CCP doesn't fix problems. Its not a "vague" future. CCP doesn't have to throw every little development idea or workings at the population of players. Its a waste of both our time and theirs. When something is done or close to completion OR mid way, they announce it. They will let us know if this current "problem" is fixed in time. That fact that people are this impatient sickens me. All you have shown is that your a bigot, incapable of seeing the bigger picture. So how about those tech moons?
This is a fascinating subject change. Tell me more. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Trollin
Perkone Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 04:00:00 -
[197] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Darth Tickles wrote:a personalized apology from the CEO. we actually got one of those it just took ppl leaving the game... Which should teach ppl, if you want anything done, quit in droves
what do you think the recession is? its a generation of john galts. if they want us to pay their healthcare and retirement with our taxes they are going to be getting some damn ****** healthcare amirite? |

Himnos Altar
An Errant Venture
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 05:17:00 -
[198] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am a customer, customer is always right. Why? Because without customers there is no business.
......
That's a customer service philosophy, not a Fact, you moron. Otherwise you'd have people buying cars for two cents.
There are times when customers are just ******* idiots, just like there are times that the company/employees can be. You can't treat your customers like the idiots they are, however (unless you have an AWESOME job), so you treat them like they're right, while you're explaining that they're wrong/explaining policies/suggest alternatives (all of which have been gone through at length in this thread). But at the end of the day, the customer is still wrong.
All of this has happened before, and all of this will happen again. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 05:21:00 -
[199] - Quote
Himnos Altar wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am a customer, customer is always right. Why? Because without customers there is no business.
...... That's a customer service philosophy, not a Fact, you moron. Otherwise you'd have people buying cars for two cents. There are times when customers are just ******* idiots, just like there are times that the company/employees can be. You can't treat your customers like the idiots they are, however (unless you have an AWESOME job), so you treat them like they're right, while you're explaining that they're wrong/explaining policies/suggest alternatives (all of which have been gone through at length in this thread). But at the end of the day, the customer is still wrong. All of this has happened before, and all of this will happen again.
I don't think my request is the equivalent of asking for a car for a dollar, idiot. All I want is the sp that I invested in Corporate contracting back.
|

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 05:28:00 -
[200] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Himnos Altar wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am a customer, customer is always right. Why? Because without customers there is no business.
...... That's a customer service philosophy, not a Fact, you moron. Otherwise you'd have people buying cars for two cents. There are times when customers are just ******* idiots, just like there are times that the company/employees can be. You can't treat your customers like the idiots they are, however (unless you have an AWESOME job), so you treat them like they're right, while you're explaining that they're wrong/explaining policies/suggest alternatives (all of which have been gone through at length in this thread). But at the end of the day, the customer is still wrong. All of this has happened before, and all of this will happen again. I don't think my request is the equivalent of asking for a car for a dollar, idiot. All I want is the sp that I invested in Corporate contracting back. They changed nothing about that aspect of the game hence no SP will be reimbursed, baby.
But I can already predict what you are going to say which is still irrelevant.
Give me an actual example of how this affects your trade practices. |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
979
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 05:33:00 -
[201] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Himnos Altar wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am a customer, customer is always right. Why? Because without customers there is no business.
...... That's a customer service philosophy, not a Fact, you moron. Otherwise you'd have people buying cars for two cents. There are times when customers are just ******* idiots, just like there are times that the company/employees can be. You can't treat your customers like the idiots they are, however (unless you have an AWESOME job), so you treat them like they're right, while you're explaining that they're wrong/explaining policies/suggest alternatives (all of which have been gone through at length in this thread). But at the end of the day, the customer is still wrong. All of this has happened before, and all of this will happen again. I don't think my request is the equivalent of asking for a car for a dollar, idiot. All I want is the sp that I invested in Corporate contracting back. No,because the logs show nothing. Moving on.... |

Himnos Altar
An Errant Venture
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 05:41:00 -
[202] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Himnos Altar wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I am a customer, customer is always right. Why? Because without customers there is no business.
...... That's a customer service philosophy, not a Fact, you moron. Otherwise you'd have people buying cars for two cents. There are times when customers are just ******* idiots, just like there are times that the company/employees can be. You can't treat your customers like the idiots they are, however (unless you have an AWESOME job), so you treat them like they're right, while you're explaining that they're wrong/explaining policies/suggest alternatives (all of which have been gone through at length in this thread). But at the end of the day, the customer is still wrong. All of this has happened before, and all of this will happen again. I don't think my request is the equivalent of asking for a car for a dollar, idiot. All I want is the sp that I invested in Corporate contracting back.
actually it is.
except you're asking to get Y amount of Plexes back (during which time you played), effectively.
I figure this by SP roughly equals playtime (give/take SP/hr depending on your stats). SO, you're asking for time that you already paid for BACK, despite the time that you ALREADY played it.
So in asking for X amount of SP back, you're asking for Y (and whatever fraction/decimal thereof) Plexes back. But you already PLAYED in that time (since CCP nerfed Ghost Training years back).
You always (unless seller is stupid) pay for time that the training took. For examples, Character Bazaar is that way -> |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
403
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 05:50:00 -
[203] - Quote
She's been asked too many times to count about how this disrupts her totally legit business practices and she just ignores the question. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Shian Yang
87
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 06:01:00 -
[204] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:She's been asked too many times to count about how this disrupts her totally legit business practices and she just ignores the question.
Greetings capsuleer Davion,
Moreover, I have just managed to check the Jita market. For a specific Deadspace item (I've checked 3 so far) there are currently 8 open contracts wanting to sell them. Prices range from 153 to 160 million ISK. There are 12 on the market ranging up to 170 million ISK.
I see people are still using Contracts, despite what capsuleer Whitehound and the princess have tried to say. I agree, seeing a proper, full explanation of how this has impacted and why it is causing problems would help judge the case. Because as things stand now it is complete rubbish.
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Zoloft Rx
Forged Prophets
19
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 06:04:00 -
[205] - Quote
It seems damn fair to me if skills that increase contract orders are reimbursed for skills that allow increased market orders. As long as it equal quantity of orders... which may not be the case when it comes to skill leveling. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6476
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 06:14:00 -
[206] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I don't think my request is the equivalent of asking for a car for a dollar, idiot. All I want is the sp that I invested in Corporate contracting back. GǪand since there is no reason to give you that SP back, you fall quite squarely into that Gǣcustomer is wrongGǥ category.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
404
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 06:21:00 -
[207] - Quote
I'm willing to bed Princess has never worked in retail before. There you learn pretty quickly that "The Customer is always right." really means telling the customer they are absolutely wrong in the nicest possible way. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Himnos Altar
An Errant Venture
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 06:24:00 -
[208] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:I'm willing to bed Princess has never worked in retail before. There you learn pretty quickly that "The Customer is always right." really means telling the customer they are absolutely wrong in the nicest possible way.
unless you have an ******* manager that reverses your decision and makes the customer right after you've spent 20 minutes or more explaining that no, this is against our policy. And you, in fact, are right, and the customer was indeed wrong.
lol.... |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
404
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 06:25:00 -
[209] - Quote
Himnos Altar wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:I'm willing to bed Princess has never worked in retail before. There you learn pretty quickly that "The Customer is always right." really means telling the customer they are absolutely wrong in the nicest possible way. unless you have an ******* manager that reverses your decision and makes the customer right after you've spent 20 minutes or more explaining that no, this is against our policy. And you, in fact, are right, and the customer was indeed wrong. lol.... not sure if I'd be willing to bed Princess....
I've had this happen too. Ugh, I wanted to strangle that guy so bad. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 06:27:00 -
[210] - Quote
The Customer Is Right only applies AFTER the parties have agreed to the terms made at payment. Since I'm an Network Technician IRL, the customers will not get crap out of me until they've agreed to the terms that I've set forth against them and then they will get 100% of my services rendered unto them. It is then that the customer is right ONLY IF I have failed to uphold any of my part of the obligations unto them. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
404
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 06:28:00 -
[211] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:The Customer Is Right only applies AFTER the parties have agreed to the terms made at payment. Since I'm an Network Technician IRL, the customers will not get crap out of me until they've agreed to the terms that I've set forth against them and then they will get 100% of my services rendered unto them. It is then that the customer is right ONLY IF I have failed to uphold any of my part of the obligations unto them.
In other words, "The customer can always get ******." Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 06:30:00 -
[212] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:The Customer Is Right only applies AFTER the parties have agreed to the terms made at payment. Since I'm an Network Technician IRL, the customers will not get crap out of me until they've agreed to the terms that I've set forth against them and then they will get 100% of my services rendered unto them. It is then that the customer is right ONLY IF I have failed to uphold any of my part of the obligations unto them. In other words, "The customer can always get ******." That's one way to put it. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4147
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 06:36:00 -
[213] - Quote
the funny part is that he's whining about "wasting" skillpoints training a rank 3 skill to V
I have corporate contracting IV on 3 different characters and that's a good 120 slots "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6477
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 06:40:00 -
[214] - Quote
Andski wrote:the funny part is that he's whining about "wasting" skillpoints training a rank 3 skill to V That's 768k skill points (plus another 45k for Contracting) that really eat into the 900k you get from your free clone, you knowGǪ  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
628
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 07:24:00 -
[215] - Quote
I am glad of the changes. No SP for YOOOOOOO Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Whitehound
263
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 09:06:00 -
[216] - Quote
Tippia wrote:No, open trades are active. Having more of them available is good, because you can react to the market that much faster. These are not trades. They are only open contracts (on a dead market).
Tippia wrote:They are better for one type of trading; contracts are better for a different kind. Someone who used to only be able to trade on one of those markets can now trade on both and gain the benefits of both. Like what? Be more specific, do not feed the OP with vague comments. OP and others want to know what they shall do with their corporation contracts now that the market is dead.
Tippia wrote:By selling things through contracts, obviously. What things?
OP's claim is still valid. Maybe you can help her by telling her what she can use the contracts for.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1816
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 14:24:00 -
[217] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:No, open trades are active. Having more of them available is good, because you can react to the market that much faster. These are not trades. They are only open contracts (on a dead market). Tippia wrote:They are better for one type of trading; contracts are better for a different kind. Someone who used to only be able to trade on one of those markets can now trade on both and gain the benefits of both. Like what? Be more specific, do not feed the OP with vague comments. OP and others want to know what they shall do with their corporation contracts now that the market is dead. Tippia wrote:By selling things through contracts, obviously. What things? OP's claim is still valid. Maybe you can help her by telling her what she can use the contracts for.
You mean like inter corp/inter alliance contracts? You mean like private contracts of all types? You mean like putting your item up for sale (via contract) and having it viewable by all of EVE instead of just one area? You mean like the ability to have an auction and sell to the highest bidder, instead of being -.01 Isked to death? You mean like retaining the ability to make courier contracts to move all manner of goods without risk?
Just to name a few.
If the skill remains functional in game, and the person made use of it previously, they got their time/money's worth out of it.
Opening the door to "I want to do something different now, so let me cash in these skills I have and spend the points on something diffferent now" devalues training decisions for everyone... essentially making those decisions worthless.
No. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
133
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 14:29:00 -
[218] - Quote
So sorry for your loss. Eve will be weaker without your smelly contracts. Never mind that most of the player base wants faction mods on the market. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 15:52:00 -
[219] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:I'll save you guys the time to read this thread.
Cliffs: Gay Mafia Princess wants CCP to reimburse contract skillpoints although A) Contracts has not changed 1 bit B) He wants to contract scam with faction mods and that puts a dent in his scamming business
His logic is that CCP somehow changed contracts (again it has not) therefore CCP must reimburse SP's for contracts.
Ergo he's being a baby. No one in this thread agrees with him.
Edit: Disregard above post. He's 100% scamming. Why? He/she/it refuses to answer the question of how this affects their "legitimate" business.
Must be Americans, really hate this if you don't say something or give us all the information you must be doing something wrong mentality. Grow up idiot. |

Nirnias Stirrum
Tr0pa de elite. G00DFELLAS
140
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 16:03:00 -
[220] - Quote
Came here expecting tears and rage.. Left very satisfied! |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
68
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 16:17:00 -
[221] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote: If they are going to institute major changes then players should be given the option of having the sp returned. Fair is fair. God are you stupid !!! Whoever said, life or EVE is fair? Things change, shut up already, go play somethig else...
|

Nirnias Stirrum
Tr0pa de elite. G00DFELLAS
142
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 16:23:00 -
[222] - Quote
Yes i demand the Universal Service charge that came into effect a few years ago, be abolished. It is taking at least 300-400 euro a month from my pay check.. Because of this change it is effecting my real life ISK making!
I to demand my real life ISK refunded! |

Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
163
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 16:42:00 -
[223] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:I'll save you guys the time to read this thread.
Cliffs: Gay Mafia Princess wants CCP to reimburse contract skillpoints although A) Contracts has not changed 1 bit B) He wants to contract scam with faction mods and that puts a dent in his scamming business
His logic is that CCP somehow changed contracts (again it has not) therefore CCP must reimburse SP's for contracts.
Ergo he's being a baby. No one in this thread agrees with him.
Edit: Disregard above post. He's 100% scamming. Why? He/she/it refuses to answer the question of how this affects their "legitimate" business. Must be Americans, really hate this if you don't say something or give us all the information you must be doing something wrong mentality. Grow up idiot.
It's a fair question, I too find it hard to understand why you deserve a refund in SP (which would really open the floodgates for the SP reallocation can of worms) because you haven't clearly stated what it is that you were doing with this skill and why it is that the changes mean you cant do whatever it is you were doing.
Please could you state it clearly, as I don't use the contracts system too much and i may not understand everything.
Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. |

Knug LiDi
N00bFleeT Numquam Ambulare Solus
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 17:01:00 -
[224] - Quote
Damn, yet another post where I'm 100% agreeing with Tip.
OP is upset because market conditions have changed.
I fail to see the validity of OP's argument.
The skills learned still do the same things, with the same results.
However, the volume of contracts for certain items on the open market appears to be reduced.
The OP wishes to be reimbursed because other capsuleers have changed their behavior?
No functionality was lost.
I'm sorry, but I cannot support OP's position,
If only we could fall into a woman's arms
without falling into her hands |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 17:03:00 -
[225] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:I'll save you guys the time to read this thread.
Cliffs: Gay Mafia Princess wants CCP to reimburse contract skillpoints although A) Contracts has not changed 1 bit B) He wants to contract scam with faction mods and that puts a dent in his scamming business
His logic is that CCP somehow changed contracts (again it has not) therefore CCP must reimburse SP's for contracts.
Ergo he's being a baby. No one in this thread agrees with him.
Edit: Disregard above post. He's 100% scamming. Why? He/she/it refuses to answer the question of how this affects their "legitimate" business. Must be Americans, really hate this if you don't say something or give us all the information you must be doing something wrong mentality. Grow up idiot. Ohh so clever! You still refuse to answer the question directed at you. Why do you need the system unchanged? Are you implying that all non-Americans do not run legitimate businesses? |

Shade Severii
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
67
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 17:07:00 -
[226] - Quote
Is there a possibility that you are distraught brother? |

Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 17:13:00 -
[227] - Quote
Scammer tears, best tears.
While you are QQing on the forums, your competitors are already adapting new ways of scamming people with contracts.
L2S |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
405
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 17:21:00 -
[228] - Quote
Pohbis wrote:Scammer tears, best tears.
While you are QQing on the forums, your competitors are already adapting new ways of scamming people with contracts.
L2S
Only terrible scammers QQ about anything. Unless something gets truly broken in the policy.
OP, if you were to answer the question on why you need the system unchanged we could troubleshoot your problem more effectively. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

mocrt
Krait Corp Fidelas Constans
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 17:22:00 -
[229] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time. This thread should go places.
Yes...straight to the recycle bin.
|

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
160
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 17:24:00 -
[230] - Quote
I would also like the SP refunded on...that skill I have...that isn't as good as it was before...yeah... |

Serge Bastana
GWA Corp Unified Church of the Unobligated
452
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 17:27:00 -
[231] - Quote
In the words of Ace Garp, tough tumshy. WoW holds your hand until end game, and gives you a cookie whether you win or lose. EVE not only takes your cookie, but laughs at you for bringing one in the first place... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6482
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 17:42:00 -
[232] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:These are not trades. Yes they are, because we're talking about using market trading in addition to contract trading, remember?
Quote:They are only open contracts (on a dead market). No, they are open trades on the market and open trades through contracts (neither of which is a dead market) GÇö having two markets to play with at once inherently means they can have more trades going on at any time, and since the second market follows different mechanics that in and of themselves allow for more trade, they can now have a lot more trades going on than before. Like, respectively, the things that can only be traded through contracts and the things that can now be traded in bulk on the market (or, if not in bulk, then at least at high velocity, requiring frequent adjustments to the market orders). Look, you can play as stupid as you like, but that only makes you look stupid. You know just as well as the OP what cannot be traded on the standard market and what limitations the market has in terms of reach. Anything he likes. The problem is that he doesn't want to tell anyone what he's trading or why this supposed (but not actual) loss of the contract market is any kind of problem.
OP's claim is completely invalid because they things that he claims have happened have not happened (or at least the scant information given has been proven to be completely false). The only thing that has happened is that the OP no longer wants to use a particular skill set for no adequately explained reason, and that he wants CCP to modify his character because of his choice to waste all that SP. The OP's problem is 100% manufactured by the OP. If the OP doesn't want to have this problem any more, he can stop creating it. CCP is not a factor in this. CCP has no reason to step in and a fuckton of reasons not to do so. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
160
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 17:53:00 -
[233] - Quote
Wish someone had told me contract markets were dead. I sold a Black Eagle Drone Link Augmentor on Item Exchange not one week ago. |

Igner Greyhound
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 22:15:00 -
[234] - Quote
Seems like the only thing that would satisfy Gay Mafia Princess is a total refund of all skill points every patch.
Even as small a change as an increase to optimal range of a single type of artillery will affect all sorts of people in the same manner as this is affecting her contracts.
More people using artillery means less people using beam lasers/missiles/railguns, so anyone who produces those should get their SP back, since they can't make as much selling those other items anymore. (They can still use those skills to produce other things, you say? But their experience with only producing railguns has been negatively affected!)
Trained cap skills? Not really needed for artillery. (Still exactly as useful for other things? Still negatively affected comparatively by the existence of slightly better artillery.) Refund!
Trained Amarr ships and laser specialization? Negatively affected. Refund!
Trained arkonor processing? That artillery uses less megacyte than comparable laser weapons. Negatively affected. Refund!
And so on, and so on... |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 04:18:00 -
[235] - Quote
Igner Greyhound wrote:Seems like the only thing that would satisfy Gay Mafia Princess is a total refund of all skill points every patch.
Even as small a change as an increase to optimal range of a single type of artillery will affect all sorts of people in the same manner as this is affecting her contracts.
More people using artillery means less people using beam lasers/missiles/railguns, so anyone who produces those should get their SP back, since they can't make as much selling those other items anymore. (They can still use those skills to produce other things, you say? But their experience with only producing railguns has been negatively affected!)
Trained cap skills? Not really needed for artillery. (Still exactly as useful for other things? Still negatively affected comparatively by the existence of slightly better artillery.) Refund!
Trained Amarr ships and laser specialization? Negatively affected. Refund!
Trained arkonor processing? That artillery uses less megacyte than comparable laser weapons. Negatively affected. Refund!
And so on, and so on...
I do not really see a problem in this tbh. If It made you happy I would use the SP to finish up some market skills so they stay within that skill family. It is just an absolute wast of SP at this point. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 04:23:00 -
[236] - Quote
Tippia wrote:[quote=
OP's claim is completely invalid because they things that he claims have happened have not happened (or at least the scant information given has been proven to be completely false). The only thing that has happened is that the OP no longer wants to use a particular skill set for no adequately explained reason, and that he wants CCP to modify his character because of his choice to waste all that SP. The OP's problem is 100% manufactured by the OP. If the OP doesn't want to have this problem any more, he can stop creating it. CCP is not a factor in this. CCP has no reason to step in and a fuckton of reasons not to do so.
So if I told you what I was doing that what make a difference? It doesn't so stop even trying to use that line. What I was doing was my own business.
This is really a bigger issue then people realize. Pretty soon all the people who have trained up skills for datacores are going to be SOL, and you don't even want to get me started about the loss of productivity in terms of PI.
The point is this, CCP isn't just nerfing titan, they are taking a baseball bat to people's dreams and livelihoods. If CCP offered something like a refund of SP I would be willing to bet they would have better retention. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6500
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 04:36:00 -
[237] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I do not really see a problem in this tbh. It pretty much breaks the game, far more than the oft-requested SP remap option would do. Again, go and check out the F&I and Skills forums for many many threads on why that would be a superbly horrible idea.
Quote:So if I told you what I was doing that what make a difference? Yes, because we cannot tell what's wrong if you won't explain it to us. Right now, there is no problem to solve GÇö you're just being silly. We cannot give you any tips on what to do with your SP, because all we know is that you don't want to use them, but we don't know for what (or what not for).
Quote:The point is this, CCP isn't just nerfing titan, they are taking a baseball bat to people's dreams and livelihoods. No, they're not. They're balancing titans, and adapting to that is part of the game. They're also improving the market, and this benefits everyone. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
419
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 04:38:00 -
[238] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:[quote=
OP's claim is completely invalid because they things that he claims have happened have not happened (or at least the scant information given has been proven to be completely false). The only thing that has happened is that the OP no longer wants to use a particular skill set for no adequately explained reason, and that he wants CCP to modify his character because of his choice to waste all that SP. The OP's problem is 100% manufactured by the OP. If the OP doesn't want to have this problem any more, he can stop creating it. CCP is not a factor in this. CCP has no reason to step in and a fuckton of reasons not to do so. So if I told you what I was doing that what make a difference? It doesn't so stop even trying to use that line. What I was doing was my own business. This is really a bigger issue then people realize. Pretty soon all the people who have trained up skills for datacores are going to be SOL, and you don't even want to get me started about the loss of productivity in terms of PI. The point is this, CCP isn't just nerfing titan, they are taking a baseball bat to people's dreams and livelihoods. If CCP offered something like a refund of SP I would be willing to bet they would have better retention.
But seriously, if you were legit selling, then the changes really don't effect you at all. If you were scamming, then we could understand and maybe have a little more sympathy for you. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
419
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 04:39:00 -
[239] - Quote
Wait wait wait, owning a titan and then having it balanced is taking a bat to their livelihood? How is that? Is it because those people are ratting in them, which is dumb? Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 05:26:00 -
[240] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:[quote=
OP's claim is completely invalid because they things that he claims have happened have not happened (or at least the scant information given has been proven to be completely false). The only thing that has happened is that the OP no longer wants to use a particular skill set for no adequately explained reason, and that he wants CCP to modify his character because of his choice to waste all that SP. The OP's problem is 100% manufactured by the OP. If the OP doesn't want to have this problem any more, he can stop creating it. CCP is not a factor in this. CCP has no reason to step in and a fuckton of reasons not to do so. So if I told you what I was doing that what make a difference? It doesn't so stop even trying to use that line. What I was doing was my own business. This is really a bigger issue then people realize. Pretty soon all the people who have trained up skills for datacores are going to be SOL, and you don't even want to get me started about the loss of productivity in terms of PI. The point is this, CCP isn't just nerfing titan, they are taking a baseball bat to people's dreams and livelihoods. If CCP offered something like a refund of SP I would be willing to bet they would have better retention. This can be summarized as this: I'm a big baby that lives on scamming but now that CCP has taken away my scamming methods, I must make a thread.
Now, the hilarious thing about your entire crusade? You're arguing over a Level 3 skill. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
420
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 05:28:00 -
[241] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:[quote=
OP's claim is completely invalid because they things that he claims have happened have not happened (or at least the scant information given has been proven to be completely false). The only thing that has happened is that the OP no longer wants to use a particular skill set for no adequately explained reason, and that he wants CCP to modify his character because of his choice to waste all that SP. The OP's problem is 100% manufactured by the OP. If the OP doesn't want to have this problem any more, he can stop creating it. CCP is not a factor in this. CCP has no reason to step in and a fuckton of reasons not to do so. So if I told you what I was doing that what make a difference? It doesn't so stop even trying to use that line. What I was doing was my own business. This is really a bigger issue then people realize. Pretty soon all the people who have trained up skills for datacores are going to be SOL, and you don't even want to get me started about the loss of productivity in terms of PI. The point is this, CCP isn't just nerfing titan, they are taking a baseball bat to people's dreams and livelihoods. If CCP offered something like a refund of SP I would be willing to bet they would have better retention. This can be summarized as this: I'm a big baby that lives on scamming but now that CCP has taken away my scamming methods, I must make a thread. Now, the hilarious thing about your entire crusade? You're arguing over a Level 3 skill.
This person has used this thread to scam us out of our words and IQ points. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Shian Yang
91
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 05:35:00 -
[242] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:This person has used this thread to scam us out of our words and IQ points.
Greetings capsuleer Davion,
I have already sent capsuleer Whitehound a contracted invoice for wasting my time. I hope he has the honour to pay it. You should do the same.
Regards,
Shian Yang
|

Mythrandier
Dracos Dozen Eve Engineering
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 07:35:00 -
[243] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote: Must be Americans, really hate this if you don't say something or give us all the information you must be doing something wrong mentality. Grow up idiot.
Eh? What has being American got to do with any thing? IGÇÖm not American and I still think the fact that you will not disclose WHY this change has affected you is highly suspect.
After 13 pages nobody has yet come up with a valid reason as to why you should get any SPGÇÖs back. As Andski quoted a few pages back it states in the TOS that changes will happen. You knew that when you started playing EvE. CCP owes you nothing.
This thread needs locking to be honest, its pointless.
|

Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1229
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 07:41:00 -
[244] - Quote
Pilgrims suck now I want my Amarr Cruiser V back. |

Ya Huei
Imperial Collective
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 10:32:00 -
[245] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:GǪand again, there is a difference between actually useless and choosing not to use a skill. No. It is only for you a difference and because you are being selfish. Does a white umbrella protect better from rain than a black one does? I doubt it, yet they are different. A difference sometimes does not matter and is only a difference.
...ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense! |

Whitehound
264
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 12:00:00 -
[246] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:These are not trades. Yes they are, because we're talking about using market trading in addition to contract trading, remember? No. A trade is a successful transaction.
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:What things? Anything he likes. You can do better than this. Name a few and show how you make profit with these. This should not be hard since you must have the same skills and are talking from experience, right?
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Francisco Bizzaro
93
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 12:16:00 -
[247] - Quote
Ya Huei wrote:Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:GǪand again, there is a difference between actually useless and choosing not to use a skill. No. It is only for you a difference and because you are being selfish. Does a white umbrella protect better from rain than a black one does? I doubt it, yet they are different. A difference sometimes does not matter and is only a difference. ...ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense! The Chewbacca Defense is not used enough on these forums. Many threads could be shortened. |

Serge Bastana
GWA Corp Unified Church of the Unobligated
454
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 12:39:00 -
[248] - Quote
Francisco Bizzaro wrote:Ya Huei wrote:Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:GǪand again, there is a difference between actually useless and choosing not to use a skill. No. It is only for you a difference and because you are being selfish. Does a white umbrella protect better from rain than a black one does? I doubt it, yet they are different. A difference sometimes does not matter and is only a difference. ...ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense! The Chewbacca Defense is not used enough on these forums. Many threads could be shortened.
I'm surprised this one still is, the OP seems might precious about those contracts. What a shame    WoW holds your hand until end game, and gives you a cookie whether you win or lose. EVE not only takes your cookie, but laughs at you for bringing one in the first place... |

lollerwaffle
Sileo In Pacis THE SPACE P0LICE
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 14:10:00 -
[249] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:1) You are being ignorant of my feelings 2) You don't dictate CCP policies 3) They changed the game so much I don't want to do anything with contracts anymore thus why I want my SP back
1) Boohoo. HTFU. Here's a tissue. 2) Neither do you. STFU 3) Please see below: They added new battlecruisers and I don't want anything to do with BC anymore thus I want my SP back. They remodelled some ship skins and I don't want anything to do with those ships, thus I want my SP back. The global economic crisis screwed up the economy, and I lost my job, thus I want my time and money spent on education back. It was raining all last week and I bought an umbrella, but it's stopped this week. I don't want anything to do with my umbrella anymore, thus I want my money back.
|

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
61
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 14:25:00 -
[250] - Quote
Gay Mafia Whitehound wrote:CCP changed things so much that I just don't want to be bothered with it anymore.
And yet, 6 pages later, you're still evidently very bothered by it. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1199
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 14:26:00 -
[251] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:I'll save you guys the time to read this thread.
Cliffs: Gay Mafia Princess wants CCP to reimburse contract skillpoints although A) Contracts has not changed 1 bit B) He wants to contract scam with faction mods and that puts a dent in his scamming business
His logic is that CCP somehow changed contracts (again it has not) therefore CCP must reimburse SP's for contracts.
Ergo he's being a baby. No one in this thread agrees with him.
Edit: Disregard above post. He's 100% scamming. Why? He/she/it refuses to answer the question of how this affects their "legitimate" business.
+1
|

Whitehound
264
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 16:26:00 -
[252] - Quote
I cannot say much about contract scams. I never fell for one of them. People whining about the OP must have fallen for a scam at some point. Why else the cry for revenge?
People who fall for scams are just dumb and they should fall for scams. They deserve to fall for them. It is in the interest of all human civilization.
And do not say one cannot scam with market orders. Not that I do it, but I get players paying me several times the price that I have asked with my sell orders. Perhaps do not play when drunk?
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6509
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:04:00 -
[253] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No. A trade is a successful transaction. That is a closed trade. We're talking having more trades open, remember? Now he can have more of them GÇö that's very beneficial.
Quote:You can do better than this. Name a few and show how you make profit with these. No, the question was answered in full. Anything can be sold at a profit using both the market and contracts. He already knows how to do this, otherwise he wouldn't have been using the skills. That's the whole point: nothing has changed about contracts, so there is literally zero reason for him to get an SP refund. The difference is that with the modules he has specialised in, he can now do it using both of those avenues and thus have more trades open at once (not to mention the other ways you can use contracts to make money, which have already been explained on numerous occasions).
Quote:And do not say one cannot scam with market orders. GǪwhich just shows that there is no reason for him to get his SP back even if that's the issue, since he can still make money the exact same way as before.
More precisely, what a shame. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:10:00 -
[254] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:I cannot say much about contract scams. I never fell for one of them. People whining about the OP must have fallen for a scam at some point. Why else the cry for revenge?
People who fall for scams are just dumb and they should fall for scams. They deserve to fall for them. It is in the interest of all human civilization.
And do not say one cannot scam with market orders. Not that I do it, but I get players paying me several times the price that I have asked with my sell orders. Perhaps do not play when drunk?
See, this could be a valid observation, but people in this thread have repeated stated that they would be MORE sympathetic to the OP if she were trying to scam with contracts and was having difficulty.
Instead the OP insists that her contract dealings are totally legit, which makes her complaints very odd, considering the fact that nothing major has changed as far as her ability to sell faction mods. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:25:00 -
[255] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:No. A trade is a successful transaction. That is a closed trade. That is a tautology.
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:You can do better than this. Name a few and show how you make profit with these. No, ... the question was answered in full. There is no question. The OP demands her SPs refunded. She is not asking for it ... Did you have a question? If you let me know what your question was then I can try to answer it for you.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Radelix Cisko
The Adjustment Team
87
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:36:00 -
[256] - Quote
13 pages about someone complaining about expanded functionality....
I trained contracts to sell researched blueprints. I heard that is very lucrative with the right BP's |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 18:02:00 -
[257] - Quote
Radelix Cisko wrote:13 pages about someone complaining about expanded functionality....
I trained contracts to sell researched blueprints. I heard that is very lucrative with the right BP's Interesting. What would you do when CCP decided to show the ME/PE levels of blueprints and copies sold over the market?
Would you then train more market orders, forget your contract skills, and live happily ever after like ... a tool?!
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6510
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 18:20:00 -
[258] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:That is a tautology. GǪwhich is why we're talking about open trades.
Quote:There is no question. GǪaside from yours, which was answered in full. Also, nice edit. Very sneaky. Also highly dishonest.
Quote:The OP demands her SPs refunded. She is not asking for it GǪand there is no reason to grant his wish, since nothing has changed.
Quote:Interesting. What would you do when CCP decided to show the ME/PE levels of blueprints and copies sold over the market? He will probably carry on doing what he currently does since, you know, they already do that. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 19:22:00 -
[259] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:That is a tautology. GǪwhich is why we're talking about open trades. No. A tautology only means you have lost the argument.
Accept it. There is nothing wrong with players making demands. If it was then we would not get gifts from CCP when it is their birthday.
What is wrong are players who pretend to be CCP, who think they act and talk like CCP, who think they are hard by accepting every nonsense and who fail to realize they are only being idiots.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6512
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 19:46:00 -
[260] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No. A tautology only means you have lost the argument. No, it means you're trying to introduce a red herring, since we're not talking about the tautology but about the open trades. So yes, by introducing the tautology, you lost the argument. Accept it. The simple fact remains: the OP now has more open trades at his disposal than before, and this is beneficial to him.
Quote:Accept it. There is nothing wrong with players making demands. Sure, but when those demands are unreasonable, there is nothing wrong with pointing this out and explaining that nothing of the sort will happen. The OP has no reason for getting his SP back since nothing has changed about contracts, and his situation has actually improved since he can now have more trades open at once in the area he's familiar with.
As always when you can no longer respond to the points being made, you start rolling out the fallacies and personal attacks. Maybe you should try some actual arguments insteadGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 19:47:00 -
[261] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:That is a tautology. GǪwhich is why we're talking about open trades. No. A tautology only means you have lost the argument. Accept it. There is nothing wrong with players making demands. If it was then we would not get gifts from CCP when it is their birthday. What is wrong are players who pretend to be CCP, who think they act and talk like CCP, who think they are hard by accepting every nonsense and who fail to realize they are only being idiots.
Are you and Gay Mafia Princess the same person? You seem incredibly unwilling to understand anyone's well reasoned comments regarding this subject. It is really quite simple, Princess is whining on the forums because he/she/it feels that the scams they used to pull off on the contract market are no longer viable. He/she/it is unwilling to admit this is the case, ergo, no-one here can offer any real assistance by way of advice, nor should they offer any kind of support to someone who has done everything possible to avoid answering one seemingly simple question.
It is also worth noting that no one is saying that customers do not have a right to voice a complaint, but when that customer refuses to validate or explain that complaint, it is also not unreasonable for everyone else to remain on the sidelines. As far as I can tell, no-one attempting to seriously converse with either yourself or Princess has alluded to them being as knowledgeable as CCP, nor that they speak on behalf of them. What most intelligent posters are saying is based on common sense, past experience with the company in question and at the very least, a rudimentary understanding of both game mechanics and realistic business models.
Perhaps you should cease your trolling, you already look quite foolish. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 20:02:00 -
[262] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Are you and Gay Mafia Princess the same person? ... Why would anyone ask such a question? And you think I am the fool here?!? 
Cutter Isaacson wrote:It is also worth noting that no one is saying that customers do not have a right to voice a complaint ... Looks to me like the exact opposite. Most people are trying to refuse the OP her demand. Why else are they all crying out? My guess is they all know that they act foolish and they do it because they can.
If there was a forum rule that says "Do not act foolish." then one could likely close the forum.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 20:05:00 -
[263] - Quote
Are you going to respond to this post, Whitehound? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1272646#post1272646 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6512
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 20:06:00 -
[264] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Why would anyone ask such a question? Because it's closing in on being the only rational explanation.
Quote:And you think I am the fool here?!?  Well, yes, but not because of what you've written here. It's more of a pattern thing.
Quote:Looks to me like the exact opposite. Most people are trying to refuse the OP her demand. That's not the exact opposite. The exact opposite would be if people refused him his right to voice a complain. No-one is doing that. We're saying that the complaint has no basis and that there is no reason to heed the demand or fulfil the wish.
GÇ£I wantGÇ¥ is not a good reason to bypass the game mechanics. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 20:13:00 -
[265] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Are you and Gay Mafia Princess the same person? ... Why would anyone ask such a question? And you think I am the fool here?!?  Cutter Isaacson wrote:It is also worth noting that no one is saying that customers do not have a right to voice a complaint ... Looks to me like the exact opposite. Most people are trying to refuse the OP her demand. Why else are they all crying out? My guess is they all know that they act foolish and they do it because they can. If there was a forum rule that says "Do not act foolish." then one could likely close the forum.
My dear chap, they are not saying the OP has no right to voice a complaint, they are merely stating personal opinion that the OP has no reason to complain. An important difference, and one you should at least attempt to learn.
And as to why I asked if you two were in fact the same person, I do not think it foolish to consider all the options, for only a fool would do otherwise.
It is also worth noting that if a rule did exist on these forums banning people from acting foolishly, I doubt that you would have gotten much past your 3rd post.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6512
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 20:30:00 -
[266] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:It is also worth noting that if a rule did exist on these forums banning people from acting foolishly, I doubt that you would have gotten much past your 3rd post. Oh, he would have been tossed out on his ears long before thatGǪ 
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 20:40:00 -
[267] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:It is also worth noting that if a rule did exist on these forums banning people from acting foolishly, I doubt that you would have gotten much past your 3rd post. Oh, he would have been tossed out on his ears long before thatGǪ 
Interesting, his first posts were as bad as his current ones. At least he is consistently idiotic. |

Citizen Smif
DarK IntenTionZ Stop Exploding You Cowards
93
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 20:42:00 -
[268] - Quote
This whole thing about 'something has been nerfed, reimburse my SP' is bullshit.. The only time CCP should ever reimburse SP is when something is removed. Jesus CCP have to be so careful not to step on toes, 'internet spaceshipz is seriuz bizzness.' |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 20:48:00 -
[269] - Quote
No. You state your opinion and opinions cannot be argued. I do not argue out of sympathies or antipathies, which is why I guess someone would ask a question like who am I or if I am the same person as the OP. Do you have anything in particular you want to know?
People cannot refuse someone their right to voice a complaint here on the forum. Only a moderator can. So you and others do what you can without having a delete button and try to trash the thread with every comment. It is the exact opposite... Believe me, if you could delete the thread you would have done so before it had reached the second page and you would not have a doubt about it.
Cutter Isaacson wrote:My dear chap ... And I am not your dear chap. You lose your argument right on the opening line of your comment. Everything else thereafter is only rant, because you fail to put actual thought into your comment. I could now say that "perhaps you should cease your trolling", but I rather ask, can you stop?
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 20:56:00 -
[270] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No. You state your opinion and opinions cannot be argued. I do not argue out of sympathies or antipathies, which is why I guess someone would ask a question like who am I or if I am the same person as the OP. Do you have anything in particular you want to know? People cannot refuse someone their right to voice a complaint here on the forum. Only a moderator can. So you and others do what you can without having a delete button and try to trash the thread with every comment. It is the exact opposite... Believe me, if you could delete the thread you would have done so before it had reached the second page and you would not have a doubt about it. Cutter Isaacson wrote:My dear chap ... And I am not your dear chap. You lose your argument right on the opening line of your comment. Everything else thereafter is only rant, because you fail to put actual thought into your comment. I could now say that "perhaps you should cease your trolling", but I rather ask, can you stop?
Politeness loses an argument that I am not actually having? Perhaps you should get some sleep, you appear to be suffering from some sort of psychosis. My comment is my opinion, which is based on analysis of this thread, specifically your responses and the more intelligent ones aimed at both yourself and Princess. It is saddening that someone such as yourself be allowed to roam around unsupervised, I fear for your safety. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 20:58:00 -
[271] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Politeness loses an argument that I am not actually having? ... I fear for your safety. I fear you have lost the topic.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6515
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 21:01:00 -
[272] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No. You state your opinion and opinions cannot be argued. GǪexcept that the post he asked you to respond to was not a matter of opinion, but of fact. Granted, you can't really argue facts either, even though you are prone to doing that anyway, but at least get your answer straight.
Quote:People cannot refuse someone their right to voice a complaint here on the forum. GǪwhich no-one is doing. Well, you kind of are, but I'm talking about the rest of us.
Quote:It is the exact opposite You mean aside from the fact that saying that a request is unreasonable isn't the same thing as saying that a request is GÇ£illegalGÇ¥. So no, it's not the exact opposite.
Quote:And I am not your dear chap. You lose your argument right on the opening line of your comment. No, he doesn't, because the opening line does not change the facts in the post GÇö facts that you are unable to refute, as always. This is why you constantly have to inject your strawmen, your red herrings, your abuse, and why you have to resort to call people trolls when they prove you completely wrong in everything you say.
So yes, please stop trolling and start responding to the arguments and the facts.
The simple fact remains: there is no reason for the OP to get his SP back. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 21:02:00 -
[273] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Politeness loses an argument that I am not actually having? ... I fear for your safety. I fear you have lost the topic.
You would make an excellent politician sir. Your skill at obfuscation, double talk and the ability to converse without ever saying anything of value is of a fairly high standard. It is also a sign of a weak mind.
|

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
162
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 21:10:00 -
[274] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Politeness loses an argument that I am not actually having? ... I fear for your safety. I fear you have lost the topic.
When dumb whine threads go to 14 pages, everybody loses.
|

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 21:11:00 -
[275] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:People cannot refuse someone their right to voice a complaint here on the forum. GǪwhich no-one is doing. Well, you kind of are, but I'm talking about the rest of us. And you are no longer talking about the topic.
I will check the thread tomorrow if any of you fools have more to say on the topic.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 21:14:00 -
[276] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No. You state your opinion and opinions cannot be argued. I do not argue out of sympathies or antipathies, which is why I guess someone would ask a question like who am I or if I am the same person as the OP. Do you have anything in particular you want to know? People cannot refuse someone their right to voice a complaint here on the forum. Only a moderator can. So you and others do what you can without having a delete button and try to trash the thread with every comment. It is the exact opposite... Believe me, if you could delete the thread you would have done so before it had reached the second page and you would not have a doubt about it. Cutter Isaacson wrote:My dear chap ... And I am not your dear chap. You lose your argument right on the opening line of your comment. Everything else thereafter is only rant, because you fail to put actual thought into your comment. I could now say that "perhaps you should cease your trolling", but I rather ask, can you stop?
These are not opinions.
Quote:See, this could be a valid observation, but people in this thread have repeated stated that they would be MORE sympathetic to the OP if she were trying to scam with contracts and was having difficulty.
Instead the OP insists that her contract dealings are totally legit, which makes her complaints very odd, considering the fact that nothing major has changed as far as her ability to sell faction mods.
You know what? Never mind. You aren't going to get it, either because you can't or, more likely, you don't want to because you would be admitting to being wrong. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 21:15:00 -
[277] - Quote
I think he's given up Tippia, it seems he ran out of illogical statements at last. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6516
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 21:18:00 -
[278] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:And you are no longer talking about the topic. I'm trying to, but you keep refusing to respond to the points being made about the topic because they prove you as wrong as you always are about everything you ever say, and you refuse to admit this embarrassing truth. So how about you do that, or at least try (and ultimately fail) to argue the case instead of being evasive and spewing fallacies all over the place?
The simple fact remains: there is no reason for the OP to get his SP back. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 05:51:00 -
[279] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:And you are no longer talking about the topic. I'm trying to, but you keep refusing to respond to the points being made about the topic because they prove you as wrong as you always are about everything you ever say, and you refuse to admit this embarrassing truth. So how about you do that, or at least try (and ultimately fail) to argue the case instead of being evasive and spewing fallacies all over the place? Oh andGǪ Quote:I will check the thread tomorrow if any of you fools have more to say on the topic. No more needs to be said until you start addressing what has already been brought up. Until you do, the facts remain the same: there is no reason for the OP to get his SP back.
One very good reason, called good customer service!! Everyone seems to miss this point. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 05:54:00 -
[280] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:And you are no longer talking about the topic. I'm trying to, but you keep refusing to respond to the points being made about the topic because they prove you as wrong as you always are about everything you ever say, and you refuse to admit this embarrassing truth. So how about you do that, or at least try (and ultimately fail) to argue the case instead of being evasive and spewing fallacies all over the place? Oh andGǪ Quote:I will check the thread tomorrow if any of you fools have more to say on the topic. No more needs to be said until you start addressing what has already been brought up. Until you do, the facts remain the same: there is no reason for the OP to get his SP back. One very good reason, called good customer service!! Everyone seems to miss this point.
Good customer service doesn't mean giving the customer everything they want. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
28
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 05:56:00 -
[281] - Quote
Princess, why don't you tell everyone why exactly the addition of faction items to the market causes problems for you. I bet then we could figure out what the problem is and CCP might be more willing to help you. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6526
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 05:56:00 -
[282] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:One very good reason, called good customer service! Except that you're not asking for customer service GÇö you're asking to be allowed to bypass game mechanics. That's something normally labelled GÇ£an exploitGÇ¥, and makes for pretty much the most awful customer disservice imaginable.
You have given absolutely no reason why any such service should be rendered to you. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
887
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 05:57:00 -
[283] - Quote
ADAPT OR CRY |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 06:10:00 -
[284] - Quote
Princess, what are you going to do if CCP doesn't give you back your SP that you don't need? |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 06:34:00 -
[285] - Quote
Tippia wrote:... No more needs to be said until you start addressing what has already been brought up. ... You were given reasons and they were explained to you. You understand them, you only do not like them. Whose problem is this?
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 06:34:00 -
[286] - Quote
Andrey Wartooth wrote:Princess, what are you going to do if CCP doesn't give you back your SP that you don't need? She becomes a Goon and burns Jita.
Seriously though, it is not her problem but CCP's. They need to be careful with how they change the game. If they do decide to make every item exchangeable over the market including blueprints and copies (and show their PE/ME levels), then contracts will become obsolete for more players. CCP will either have to introduce new purposes for contracts or burn players.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 06:36:00 -
[287] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:... No more needs to be said until you start addressing what has already been brought up. ... You were given reasons and they were explained to you. You understand them, you only do not like them. Whose problem is this?
What were those reasons? I didn't see any reasons when I skimmed through this thread. I saw a lot of whining and moaning about a supposed contract change. But I don't recall seeing any actual reasons other than "contracts".
I think OP is just trolling and you are just here to push it along, just like you do in every thread you post in.
Whitehound wrote:Andrey Wartooth wrote:Princess, what are you going to do if CCP doesn't give you back your SP that you don't need? She becomes a Goon and burns Jita ... 
And this is fu-u-u-u-u-nny. Are you trying to imply that we burned Jita because of a beneficial addition to the game that made us adapt when we didn't want to?
You people are going to keep going on about this Jita thing despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, aren't you? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6526
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 06:39:00 -
[288] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:You were given reasons and they were explained to you. GǪand were quickly shown to be nonsensical. Now it's your turn to argue the points being made, which you can't do because you know they're correct.
The fact remains: there is no reason to give the OP his SP back.
Quote:Whose problem is this? Yours. The ball is entirely in your court and you refuse to even swing at it, so you choose to troll instead as you always do when you can't actually come up with any kind of argument to support your case.
So would you like to actually discuss the matter at hand, or just keep going off topic in your failed evasion attempts? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 06:46:00 -
[289] - Quote
Andrey Wartooth wrote:And this is fu-u-u-u-u-nny. Are you trying to imply that we burned Jita because of a beneficial addition to the game that made us adapt when we didn't want to? No, because your boss did not get his way.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 06:47:00 -
[290] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪand were quickly shown to be nonsensical. .. No. Again, you only do not like them. Not my problem.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Shian Yang
97
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 06:51:00 -
[291] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:GǪand were quickly shown to be nonsensical. .. No. Again, you only do not like them. Not my problem.
Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
If you are correct why are you not being supported in your arguments by all the traders that have been allegedly put out by this?
And why is the contract market still so very, very active?
Could it perhaps be that, as the noble capsuleer Tippia has said, your entire point is nonsensical. I think this is a likely explanation.
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6526
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 06:54:00 -
[292] - Quote
Incorrect, as always. Everything the OP has said has been proven false, ill-informed, unsupported, or otherwise without any basis. Ok, so you have no arguments to counter the points and facts presented and you have no wish to try to argue against them. We already know this. It's nice of you to finally admit it.
So the fact remains: there is no reason why the OP should get his SP back. Would you like to actually argue the topic or just keep failing at evading it? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

scooter Kondur
Pyramid Celestial
112
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 07:02:00 -
[293] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Incorrect, as always. Everything the OP has said has been proven false, ill-informed, unsupported, or otherwise without any basis. Ok, so you have no arguments to counter the points and facts presented and you have no wish to try to argue against them. We already know this. It's nice of you to finally admit it. Quote:If they do decide to make every item exchangeable over the market including blueprints and copies (and show their PE/ME levels), then contracts will become obsolete for more players. CCP will either have to introduce new purposes for contracts or burn players. Good thing that they're not doing that for a number of technical reasons, then. Should that ever happen, then maybe they will offer a universal SP reimbursement, but that's not what's happening here. All that's going on here is that the OP no longer wishes to use a couple of the skills he has trained for no adequately explained reason. GÇ£I wantGÇ¥ is not a reason to let players ignore the game mechanics. So the fact remains: there is no reason why the OP should get his SP back.
More Tippia lies. I will tell my corp mate to ignore you. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
888
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 07:03:00 -
[294] - Quote
whitehound humiliated in another thread |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6526
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 07:06:00 -
[295] - Quote
scooter Kondur wrote:More Tippia lies. Well, that exhaustive list and detailed breakdown sure shut me upGǪ
GǪoh wait, here I am still writing things. Something must be amiss!
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 07:38:00 -
[296] - Quote
Tippia wrote:...nag nag nag... Just no.
If CCP ever implements a method to untrain and reimburse skills after a change then it becomes entirely your own choice. You would be the only person who out of an infantile logic will refuse to take advantage of it. It would be your right to do so and nobody's problem but yours. 
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 07:43:00 -
[297] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:whitehound humiliated in another thread Is that so?
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6527
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 07:50:00 -
[298] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Just no. Not good enough. You need an actual argument as well.
Quote:If CCP ever implements a method to untrain and reimburse skills after a change GǪthen they might as well remove skills altogether. Fortunately, they're not going to do that due to the damage it will do to the game.
Quote:You would be the only person who out of an infantile logic will refuse to take advantage of it. That's an interesting strawman argument. What logic are you talking about? Where does any of this come from?
Why can't you discuss the topic at hand and argue the points being made? The simple fact remains: there is no reason to give the OP his SP back. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
1453
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 07:56:00 -
[299] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:CCP really needs to address this issue ASAP. With upcoming changes to FW and datacores that is going to wipe out another useful avenue of revenue I had. IF they keep this up I am going to be ruined.
Refunding your SP will open up new revenue streams for you .... how exactly? |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:00:00 -
[300] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Not good enough. You need an actual argument as well. You are not the judge here so shut up now.
Quote:GǪthen they might as well remove skills altogether. Fortunately, they're not going to do that due to the damage it will do to the game. And why would this be?
Quote:Why can't you discuss the topic at hand and argue the points being made? I told you a few times. Your dislikes are not a problem of mine.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:01:00 -
[301] - Quote
Asuka Solo wrote:Refunding your SP will open up new revenue streams for you .... how exactly? Had you followed the thread then you would know that one could use the reimbursed SPs to train trade skills. It is the obvious choice.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4178
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:04:00 -
[302] - Quote
I have 95 of 120 corp contract slots tied up across 3 characters, yeah the contract system is totally useless
lol "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6527
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:12:00 -
[303] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:You are not the judge here so shut up now. No. The policy is, and the policy says that he has no reason to get his SP back. Also, reality is, and the reality is that his claims are false.
GÇ£I wishGÇ£ is not a good reason to bypass the game mechanics.
Quote:And why would this be? As mentioned numerous times, had you actually followed the thread: see the many many threads on SP remaps in the F&I and skill forums.
Quote:I told you a few times. No you didn't, but at least you admit that you can't discuss the topic. This means you're just trolling in a failed attempt to hide this fact.
Quote:Had you followed the thread then you would know that one could use the reimbursed SPs to train trade skills. It is the obvious choice. He can do that anyway, and that means CCP doesn't have to let him skip the game mechanics for no good reason. So the fact remains: there is no good reason for the OP to get his SP back. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:13:00 -
[304] - Quote
Andski wrote:oh yeah I forgot that you can sell fitted ships, researched blueprints and BPCs through the market and that you can limit who you can sell things to through the market
good point The OP has specialised on shiny modules. She would now need to train science skills or for a freighter to make use of her contracts. Maybe she already has got these skills, but if not then she is now forced to spend some extra training time. There is then nothing wrong with CCP offering skill reimbursement after a change. In fact if they had such a system in place could CCP make more substantial changes to the game than before.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6527
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:16:00 -
[305] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:The OP has specialised on shiny modules. GǪand can still do so. Nothing has changed. In fact, now he can be even better at it than before since more open trades and markets are available to him.
Quote:She would now need to train science skills or for a freighter to make use of her contracts. No he doesn't. He can use them in exactly the same way as always. Science and freighter skills are particularly irrelevant to using contracts (in fact, it's the absence of both that fuel a lot of contract use).
Quote:Maybe she already has got these skills, but if not then she is now forced to spend some extra training time. And as with all such things, the skill system already allows for the adaptation needed should that be the case (it isn't, since nothing has changed).
Quote:There is then nothing wrong with CCP offering skill reimbursement after a change. GǪaside from it being completely counter to the policy of not reimbursing something that hasn't been lost. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:24:00 -
[306] - Quote
Tippia wrote:No. The policy is, and the policy says that he has no reason to get his SP back. No. Shut up. You also do not get to make policies here.
Tippia wrote:As mentioned numerous times, had you actually followed the thread: see the many many threads on SP remaps in the F&I and skill forums. And yet did CCP introduce a system to reimburse skill points and used it at least twice from what I remember.
By the way, denying good reasons only means you see them as good reasons.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:25:00 -
[307] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Nothing has changed. Yes, you are as ignorant to changes as ever...
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6527
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:28:00 -
[308] - Quote
Incorrect. Go read it.
Quote:And yet did CCP introduce a system to reimburse skill points GǪwhich isn't the same thing as a remap system.
Quote:By the way, denying good reasons only means you see them as good reasons. Nope. It can also mean that the reasons are no good, for instance when they go counter to facts.
Quote:Yes, I have no argument, as always... We know. You make it abundantly clear every time you post. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
889
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:29:00 -
[309] - Quote
I can't believe he pays a monthly fee to get treated like this. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4178
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:30:00 -
[310] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Andski wrote:oh yeah I forgot that you can sell fitted ships, researched blueprints and BPCs through the market and that you can limit who you can sell things to through the market
good point The OP has specialised on shiny modules. She would now need to train science skills or for a freighter to make use of her contracts. Maybe she already has got these skills, but if not then she is now forced to spend some extra training time. There is then nothing wrong with CCP offering skill reimbursement after a change. In fact if they had such a system in place could CCP make more substantial changes to the game than before.
yo you should go back a few pages and check out that quote I made straight from da tos "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:31:00 -
[311] - Quote
Tippia wrote:which isn't the same thing as a remap system. And which nobody here is talking about.
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:By the way, denying good reasons only means you see them as good reasons. Nope. Yes you did. And you now edited your comment, too. 
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6528
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:32:00 -
[312] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:I can't believe he pays a monthly fee to get treated like this. Don't worry. He likes it. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6528
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:36:00 -
[313] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:And which nobody here is talking about. GǪexcept for you and except that this is exactly what the OP (and you) are asking for: GÇ£a method to untrain and reimburse skills after a changeGÇ¥ GÇö a.k.a. a remap system.
Ehm. You know, if you're going to say that, it really helps is if the thing you're responding to is actually something anyone did. So no, denying good reasons does not only mean you seem them as good reasons. Most commonly, it means you see them as bad reasons or as nonsensical.
Quote:And you now edit your comment, too. There would be an GÇ£edited byGÇ¥ heading above it if I did. There isn't, so I didn't, so you're wrong as always. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:48:00 -
[314] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪexcept for you and except that this is exactly what the OP (and you) are asking for: GÇ£a method to untrain and reimburse skills after a changeGÇ¥ GÇö a.k.a. a remap system. No. It is not a remap system as with the attributes. You would only be allowed to have specific skills untrained by CCP and their SPs reimbursed and only after a change was made.
What are you so afraid of?
Right, why should I care?!
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6528
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 08:53:00 -
[315] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No. It is not a remap system as with the attributes. GǪexcept that that's exactly what you and the OP are describing.
Quote:You would only be allowed to have specific skills untrained by CCP and their SPs reimbursed and only after a change was made. GǪwhich already happens if there is a significant enough change. Since nothing changed in this case, nothing is being reiumbursed.
By the way: this is why there is no reason for the OP to get his SP back.
Quote:Right, why should I care?! Because one would think that you're trying to make sense and present an arguGǪ oh, sorry. I see now. You already said that you can't do that. Sorry, I assumed you weren't just posting for the sake of it there for a while. I'll try not to make the same mistake again. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 09:02:00 -
[316] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪexcept that that's exactly what you and the OP are describing. No. You are seeing it wrong.
Quote:GǪwhich already happens if there is a significant enough change. Since nothing changed in this case, nothing is being reiumbursed.
By the way: this is why there is no reason for the OP to get his SP back. Now you are denying the change altogether. 
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6530
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 09:08:00 -
[317] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No. You are seeing it wrong. U-huhGǪ Gǣa method to untrain and reimburse skills after a changeGǥ. Yup. Remap system, especially since the OP wants it to happen at the slightest modification.
Quote:Now you are denying the change altogether.  GÇ£Now?GÇ¥ Oi! Come on! Pay attention! This was said back on page one and has been said ever since: no, nothing changed about contracts that warrants a recall of the contracting skill SP. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 09:18:00 -
[318] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:Now you are denying the change altogether.  GÇ£Now?GÇ¥ Oi! Come on! Pay attention! This was said back on page one and has been said ever since: no, nothing changed about contracts that warrants a recall of the contracting skill SP. No. You are now denying that the game itself has changed as if there had been no patch. You did not do that before. You have gone mad. 
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6530
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 09:22:00 -
[319] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:No. You are now denying that the game itself has changed as if there had been no patch. Nope. Nice strawman, though.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 09:38:00 -
[320] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Whitehound wrote:No. You are now denying that the game itself has changed as if there had been no patch. Nope. Nice strawman, though. Nice troll.
Took you 16 pages to go into complete denial over something that will only give you an advantage. 
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4179
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 09:46:00 -
[321] - Quote
okay relevant expert Whitehound tell us all about the changes to the contract mechanic "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6530
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 09:49:00 -
[322] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Took you 16 pages to go into complete denial over something that will only give you an advantage. EhGǪ what are you talking about? What advantage do I gain from the fact that the contract system hasn't changed in any way (outside of trivially proving you wrong time and time again)? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Fabulousli Obvious
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 11:23:00 -
[323] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:No. The policy is, and the policy says that he has no reason to get his SP back. No. Shut up. You also do not get to make policies here.
Wow. THAT was easy. I shoulda tried that a year ago....... Last words:-á Either that wallpaper goes, or I do. ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900 |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 15:32:00 -
[324] - Quote
Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:No. The policy is, and the policy says that he has no reason to get his SP back. No. Shut up. You also do not get to make policies here. Wow. THAT was easy. I shoulda tried that a year ago.......
Everyone seems to agree that the game HAS changed so why shouldn't the policies governing it? Things change, how can me getting my SP back be anything but a good thing? I can see it as a win-win situation for everyone.
Also Tipia comes off as a pretty bossy CCP brown noser. I don't think anyone needs more CCP policies spewed at them. |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
55
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 15:44:00 -
[325] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:No. The policy is, and the policy says that he has no reason to get his SP back. No. Shut up. You also do not get to make policies here. Wow. THAT was easy. I shoulda tried that a year ago....... Everyone seems to agree that the game HAS changed so why shouldn't the policies governing it? Things change, how can me getting my SP back be anything but a good thing? I can see it as a win-win situation for everyone. Also Tipia comes off as a pretty bossy CCP brown noser. I don't think anyone needs more CCP policies spewed at them. The game changed which is natural for an MMO. Another thing that's changed is that modules that were limited to the contract market expanded to the trade market. Especially A) It simplifies it B) Reduces the amount of ISK that were burned in contracting. What hasn't changed is the contract market which you are crying about and will not get your LEVEL 3 SP back. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Pyramid Celestial
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 16:48:00 -
[326] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:No. The policy is, and the policy says that he has no reason to get his SP back. No. Shut up. You also do not get to make policies here. Wow. THAT was easy. I shoulda tried that a year ago....... Everyone seems to agree that the game HAS changed so why shouldn't the policies governing it? Things change, how can me getting my SP back be anything but a good thing? I can see it as a win-win situation for everyone. Also Tipia comes off as a pretty bossy CCP brown noser. I don't think anyone needs more CCP policies spewed at them. The game changed which is natural for an MMO. Another thing that's changed is that modules that were limited to the contract market expanded to the trade market. Especially A) It simplifies it B) Reduces the amount of ISK that were burned in contracting. What hasn't changed is the contract market which you are crying about and will not get your LEVEL 3 SP back.
LEVEL 3 SP - exactly the point, small thing to keep a person happy..... |

Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 16:54:00 -
[327] - Quote
The only time you get SP back is when the skill are removed from the game (i.e. learning skills). You don't get refunded SP due to balancing and minor game changes. Contracts are still a viable part of the game, for example the holding corp for my alliance has 100s of ships contracted to the alliance below market value. When contracts get totally taken out of the game, then you will get your SP refunded. You should probably hold your breath.
If CCP were to refund SP for every skill/item they balance every single patch they would have to refund trillions of SP. It's not going to happen, get over it. I know your parents always told you that you were special, but I am here to tell you you're not. The world of Eve does not revolve around you, so don't expect CCP to appease you at the cost of everyone else. |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
70
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 16:56:00 -
[328] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:they would have to refund trillions of SP. I'd settle for 1 Billion... |

Barkaial Starfinder
Rim Collection RC Test Alliance Please Ignore
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 17:00:00 -
[329] - Quote
You can't give the kids all they want, they'll want more. They'll want everything for no reason at all. |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 18:00:00 -
[330] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:LEVEL 3 SP - exactly the point, small thing to keep a person happy..... CCP: Level 3 SP - exactly the point. Get over it. |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 20:22:00 -
[331] - Quote
Barkaial Starfinder wrote:You can't give the kids all they want, they'll want more. They'll want everything for no reason at all. We always want more and CCP knows this. No need for you to worry about CCP. They call themselves Crowd Control Products and it would be silly if they could not handle it, right?
Back on the topic:
CCP have been changing the markets and who knows what else they have planned for us in the future. Might be that public item exchange contracts will disappear altogether?! Allowing faction, deadspace and officer items to be sold over the regional markets is certainly interesting, but I only see it being useful for faction items and where Militia players cannot enter Caldari space. For faction modules will there be enough volume to keep a few regional markets like Domain, The Forge, Sinq Laison and Heimatar going and because of the Militias. For deadspace and officer modules do I see little hope for them to be sold in any meaningful volumes outside The Forge / Jita. However, I have no doubt that the regional markets will sooner or later make the public item exchange contracts obsolete, simply because of websites like EVE Central and tools like EFT and PYFA, which will be able to show accurate price information thanks to EVE Central.
We now have multiple regional markets plus public item exchange contracts and split markets are a step backwards away from an easy to use market system. I am somewhat certain that CCP will not let this hang in the air forever. Could be it was a decision made purely out of convenience, to choke scams and to see the effect it will have without deciding anything further at this point. They did said they will bring further changes to the market system like higher transaction tax and to make trading skills more useful. I like the OP's demand. She is not against the change, but points out the effect it has on her and offers a possible solution. I am all for a constructive discussion.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 21:20:00 -
[332] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:but points out the effect it has on her and offers a possible solution. I am all for a constructive discussion. What effect was that? It's the only critical missing thing that he/she/it refuses to say. The only "possible" solution he/she/it is demanding a reimbursement of the SP that he already spent on a skill that is still useful ie: Blueprints & exchanging (tic for tac) |

arcca jeth
Dark Alliance Dark Empire Alliance
80
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 21:37:00 -
[333] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:I do not understand at all why more people don't complain about htis sort of thing. Because there is nothing to complain about. Quote:Titans are a good example you spend good isk and more importantly time to just have CCP nerf what ever you do. Yes, that happens when things are not working properly. Quote:If they are going to institute major changes then players should be given the option of having the sp returned. And when major changes are instituted, they do. Making Titans more reasonable and improving the market do not constitute major changes. Quote:As an aside, very poor customer service in having to be told to offer this in the first place. No, just very poor customers.
CCP should edit Tippia's name to Snippia for obvious reasons
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3090
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 21:42:00 -
[334] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote: Everyone seems to agree that the game HAS changed so why shouldn't the policies governing it? Things change, how can me getting my SP back be anything but a good thing? I can see it as a win-win situation for everyone.
Also Tipia comes off as a pretty bossy CCP brown noser. I don't think anyone needs more CCP policies spewed at them.
because giving worthless gay babies treats in a game filled with worthless gay babies means you give out a lot of treats and that is bad |

terrly bronks
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:00:00 -
[335] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Darth Tickles wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time. CCP has a long history of refunding SP after changes to mechanics. Shouldn't be a problem. Any day now you should be getting your SP refund and a personalized apology from the CEO. I doubt it. There hasn't been anything mentioned in a Dev blog about it at all. This is total nonsense. After spending the time to train characters up to be specialized in a certain area CCP has the audacity to to this!!! I mean come on....
no diff than getting torp lv 5 and torp sp lvl 5 then they nerf the torps :( missles suck over 13 mill sp and worthless... I do lasser now :) not maxed and do more damage they rock
hehe addapted.....
|

Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
288
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 01:54:00 -
[336] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:I'll save you guys the time to read this thread.
Cliffs: Gay Mafia Princess wants CCP to reimburse contract skillpoints although A) Contracts has not changed 1 bit B) He wants to contract scam with faction mods and that puts a dent in his scamming business
His logic is that CCP somehow changed contracts (again it has not) therefore CCP must reimburse SP's for contracts.
Ergo he's being a baby. No one in this thread agrees with him.
Edit: Disregard above post. He's 100% scamming. Why? He/she/it refuses to answer the question of how this affects their "legitimate" business.
scamming is an approved profession by CCP. Scamming just got nerfed. Understandable that scammers would be upset.
However, since 2003, soooo many things have been nerfed, if i were to get a skillpoint refund for each gameplay item that was altered, they would almost have to let me do a complete skillpoint remap
The game changes, you adapt. If you hang around long enough, those skills will become useful again to you at some point.
... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6577
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 02:18:00 -
[337] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:CCP have been changing the markets and who knows what else they have planned for us in the future. GǪand in doing so, nothing has been changed about contracts, and nothing is in the books for being changed about them (except maybe make them better and allow for new items to be contracted). So the fundamental question remains: why on earth should the OP get any SP back when nothing has changed about the skills?
Nothing.
Should they ever change the game to such a degree that the skills become useless or vastly different in what they can do, then maybe, but guess what: the last (and only) time that happened, they did give people a refund. What you're asking for already exists. It just isn't applicable in this case because nothing changed that warrants a refund. What the OP is asking for (essentially a SP remap system) will never exist because it fundamentally breaks the entire skill system.
Quote:We now have multiple regional markets plus public item exchange contracts and split markets are a step backwards away from an easy to use market system. It's not a step backwards. It's not a step at all. It's the exact split we've had for many many years and which has worked admirably for all those year. If anything, it's a step forwards since more items are now available on the bulk market, which is easier to use.
Quote:I am all for a constructive discussion. No, you're not. You're for the OP getting his will for no adequate reason GÇö GÇ£I wantGÇ¥ doesn't qualify. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Minsc
Order of the Phoenix IMPERIAL LEGI0N
49
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 04:01:00 -
[338] - Quote
So someone has in fact tested that you can put faction/officer/deadspace modules up for sale on the market, which is counter to what they originally stated? AFAIK they needed to add the modules to the market so they could track the average selling price what it that they would still be sold only through contracts. If not then this entire threadnaught of fucktardedness was a waste of time for all involved. |

Shian Yang
106
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 04:10:00 -
[339] - Quote
Minsc wrote:So someone has in fact tested that you can put faction/officer/deadspace modules up for sale on the market
Greetings capsuleer,
I believe you can. Some of them are on the market currently. An example is a Pith X-Type Shield Boost Amplifier.
And the modules are still being sold through contract as well.
Regards,
Shian Yang
|

Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 04:18:00 -
[340] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:The only time you get SP back is when the skill are removed from the game (i.e. learning skills). You don't get refunded SP due to balancing and minor game changes. Contracts are still a viable part of the game, for example the holding corp for my alliance has 100s of ships contracted to the alliance below market value. When contracts get totally taken out of the game, then you will get your SP refunded. You should probably hold your breath.
If CCP were to refund SP for every skill/item they balance every single patch they would have to refund trillions of SP. It's not going to happen, get over it. I know your parents always told you that you were special, but I am here to tell you you're not. The world of Eve does not revolve around you, so don't expect CCP to appease you at the cost of everyone else.
didnt know everyone else would be destroyed for getting their sp back for skills ONLY related to this change
Minsc wrote:If not then this entire threadnaught of fucktardedness was a waste of time for all involved.
psssst
It IS anyways. Youre not getting those SP back just like Im not getting the time it took to type this back http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2317/JKES0811.17.1 Bees That Drink Human Tears -- ITS SCIENCE!!! |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1070
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 04:22:00 -
[341] - Quote
Minsc wrote: this entire threadnaught of fucktardedness was a waste of time for all involved. Not empty quoting. |

Shian Yang
106
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 04:24:00 -
[342] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:didnt know everyone else would be destroyed for getting their sp back for skills ONLY related to this change
Greetings capsuleer Malkavian,
There are those who still use the Contract system that may not want those points back. Then, if they refund and have to re-spend those skill points what happens to existing contracts? Are they cancelled? Must the broker deposit for them be refunded? Or does that just fall away. Maybe it would be better to have this an opt-in refund ... but then the systems for that needs to be built and one must hope the builders get it correct. 100% correct.
This is a messy change that has potentially large ramifications and it is utterly needless as the Contract system is still well used and in-place. As capsuleer Princess is unwilling to share how this impacts so the need for this can be better gauged, nobody reasonable will support this because: "I want it" followed by a drumming of heels typically only works for 3 year old, snot nosed children.
Regards,
Shian Yang
|

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 12:35:00 -
[343] - Quote
Tippia wrote:So the fundamental question remains: why on earth should the OP get any SP back when nothing has changed about the skills? Because the OP sees it as a solution to her problem. A problem you do not have and therefore you claim it does not exist. That is narcissism, abusive and destructive.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Shian Yang
107
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 12:38:00 -
[344] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Because the OP sees it as a solution to her problem.
Greetings capsuleer,
What is her problem?
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 12:47:00 -
[345] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote:Whitehound wrote:Because the OP sees it as a solution to her problem. Greetings capsuleer, What is her problem? Regards, Shian Yang So now after 17 pages do you want to know what the problem is? 
GTFO.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Shian Yang
107
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 12:49:00 -
[346] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:So now after 17 pages do you want to know what the problem is?
Greetings capsuleer,
Other capsuleers have been asking. I've asked three times. Thus far neither you nor the OP have been able to say.
Regards,
Shian Yang
|

Whitehound
265
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 12:55:00 -
[347] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote:Whitehound wrote:So now after 17 pages do you want to know what the problem is? Greetings capsuleer, Other capsuleers have been asking. I've asked three times. Thus far neither you nor the OP have been able to say. Regards, Shian Yang Then obviously are you too dumb to grasp it. You are simply out of luck this time.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Shian Yang
107
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 13:02:00 -
[348] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Shian Yang wrote:Whitehound wrote:So now after 17 pages do you want to know what the problem is? Greetings capsuleer, Other capsuleers have been asking. I've asked three times. Thus far neither you nor the OP have been able to say. Regards, Shian Yang Then obviously are you too dumb to grasp it. You are simply out of luck this time.
Greetings capsuleer,
No, because thus far your rhetoric has been inadequate. Same with the Princess. I mean, how pathetic - you cannot even articulate it? Just goes to show. You know **** nothing.
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 14:29:00 -
[349] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:So now after 17 pages do you want to know what the problem is?  GTFO. And what was that problem? Oh right, he/she/it didn't even say because he/she/it refuses to. |

Gay Mafia Princess
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 19:35:00 -
[350] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:Whitehound wrote:So now after 17 pages do you want to know what the problem is?  GTFO. And what was that problem? Oh right, he/she/it didn't even say because he/she/it refuses to.
Makes no difference what I was doing before. Go find out yourself s if it is really that important for you to know (If you know how to check past contracts). If you don't don't expect me to give you lessons on how to use the market. The point is that I can't do what I was doing before because CCP made significant changes to the way the skill was being used. My original intent was to use it in a certain way and that is no longer a possibility. The same logic applies to anyone who may have trained PI because fo the significant profits to start with, datacore farming and even Titan pilots.
CCP if you are going to change aspects the game that people have chosen to play then please give me the option to find something else to do in the game when you make such major changes.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6632
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 20:21:00 -
[351] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Because the OP sees it as a solution to her problem. The problem the OP has is of his own making. If he wants to solve it, he already can. He has chosen not to, so why on earth should he have his SP refunded? That would be like people getting their Ravens refunded when they choose to fit them with hull tanks rather than shield tanks and get blown up.
Quote:So now after 17 pages do you want to know what the problem is? No. People have been asking what the problem is from the very start, since all indications are towards the problem being one that the OP has created, rather than any kind of issue with the game (which might open for the possibility, while still very unlikely, that he might have a case for getting a refund).
The OP hasn't been able to present any such issue and refuses to explain what the problem is, beyond very vague hints that only prove that an SP refund is not only unnecessary, but completely contrary to reimbursement policy.
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Makes no difference what I was doing before. Yes it does, because what you did before will determine whether a problem exists or not or whether you've just chosen to do something else. Every indication so far points to the latter so there is absolutely no reason to refund your SP, because you have chosen not to use that SP GÇö nothing has actually been changed or lost for you.
Quote:CCP if you are going to change aspects the game that people have chosen to play then please give me the option to find something else to do in the game when you make such major changes. GǪand when they make a major change, they do refund people's SP. No major change has occurred for, oh, a year and a half. So why should you get your SP back?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
268
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 21:00:00 -
[352] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The problem the OP has is of his own making. First you say the OP does not have a problem, then you say it is her problem ... You will be changing your stance again and again. At least now you admit to see a problem. It is a tiny step forward after all these pages.
One cannot train all skills and one needs to make choices, which skills to train and which to skip. Everyone makes these choices. Some choose to train lots of trading skills others choose to train contract skills for example. If a game change moves items from the contract market to the trade market and it creates a problem with the choices some players have made then it is a problem created by CCP. Players cannot foresee such changes when they make their decision and have to base them on the is-state of the game.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Shian Yang
109
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 21:40:00 -
[353] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:If a game change moves items from the contract market to the trade market and it creates a problem with the choices some players have made then it is a problem created by CCP.
Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
And yet, the Contract market is still alive and items are sold there as they were before. Pices may be adjusted as the market comes into play, but do you honestly believe SP should be refunded because prices are changing? That would be dumb.
You have no point.
Regards,
Shian Yang
|

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 22:25:00 -
[354] - Quote
For: Gay Mafia Princess & Whitehound Against: Rest of Eve Online.
Sorry, the game isn't going to revolve around you two idiots.
Still no reasons from he/she/it as usual. |

Whitehound
269
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:01:00 -
[355] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote:... but do you honestly believe SP should be refunded because prices are changing? ... I did not do a check on all items on the markets, but from only three I have picked do I not see a change in price, only in trade volume:
Fed. Navy Mag Stabs on sale in contracts: 64, on market: 298 Republic Fleet 100MN AB on sale in contracts: 19, on market: 42 Imperial Navy EANM on sale in contracts: 71, on market: 469
The price ranges on these items are roughly the same for contracts and markets. The items on the market are already on EVE Central. Fed. Navy Mag Stabs / Republic Fleet 100MN AB / Imperial Navy EANM
In perhaps a year will the contract market be dead and once every player has figured it out. It is then not about what I or you believe. It has little to do with belief... It is about what the affected players think is fair for them and what CCP can do.
If CCP cannot offer a better solution then, yes, they should reimburse the affected players their contracting skills and allow them to put the SPs into trading skills.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
269
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:03:00 -
[356] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:For: Gay Mafia Princess & Whitehound Against: Rest of Eve Online.
Sorry, the game isn't going to revolve around you two idiots.
Still no reasons from he/she/it as usual. You post like a pubbie.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:14:00 -
[357] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:For: Gay Mafia Princess & Whitehound Against: Rest of Eve Online.
Sorry, the game isn't going to revolve around you two idiots.
Still no reasons from he/she/it as usual. You post like a pubbie. Sound like a pubbie? You've been crying over irrelevant changes that had zero effect on the skill in question. Talk about irony, pubbie. Especially I'm a goon so ergo it is impossible for me to be a pubbie.
Also the contract market will not die at all. There are still uses for it which every corporation and alliance uses this to their advantage. For example, Burn Jita had 500 ship contracts up to to the alliance consistently to burn through for the duration of the event. Especially they were either fully assembled, ship w/ items in the hold, or came with multiple items as well as ship. Also other people will sell their ships via contract including shipment methods like Red Frog.
Contract market is far from dead. The items listed above is a good change for those modules because people burn less money and can post in bulk amount rather than individually. Contract market didn't give wiggle room on those modules and if changes had to be made, they were to be cancelled and reposted again. This is a huge benefit to pubbies like you but since you and Gay Mafia Princess are hugely dependent on scamming, I call that a good change for modules. Another bonus about the changes was that just typing "100MN Afterburner" will yield the entire list of possibilities ranging from the Meta 0 crap up to Meta 14 or whatever. Including the fact that it can be now searchable via the web. BPC's\BPO's will never be on the market because it is much complicated than that unless CCP has extra columns for the levels in BPC's. |

Shian Yang
109
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:17:00 -
[358] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:In perhaps a year will the contract market be dead and once every player has figured it out.
Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
Then in perhaps a year we can revisit this. Until then, there is no reason to make an exception to a reasonably standard approach. Note other cases where New Eden was not fundamentally affected and no reimbursement was done. Like for example the changes to the Insurance payout and mechanisms.
The universe is not run on player whim. And perhaps j and maybe just do not cut it for skill point reimbursement. I think the deafening silence and lack of response to any petitions the OP may have raised is a clear signal of CCP's policy, don't you?
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
77
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:21:00 -
[359] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:No. The policy is, and the policy says that he has no reason to get his SP back. No. Shut up. You also do not get to make policies here. Tippia wrote:As mentioned numerous times, had you actually followed the thread: see the many many threads on SP remaps in the F&I and skill forums. And yet did CCP introduce a system to reimburse skill points and used it at least twice from what I remember. By the way, denying good reasons only means you see them as good reasons.
Where did you get the impression that Tippia was making policy? Can you not read the policies laid down by CCP? Would you like for it to be drawn in crayon?
|

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:22:00 -
[360] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:No. The policy is, and the policy says that he has no reason to get his SP back. No. Shut up. You also do not get to make policies here. Tippia wrote:As mentioned numerous times, had you actually followed the thread: see the many many threads on SP remaps in the F&I and skill forums. And yet did CCP introduce a system to reimburse skill points and used it at least twice from what I remember. By the way, denying good reasons only means you see them as good reasons. Where did you get the impression that Tippia was making policy? Can you not read the policies laid down by CCP? Would you like for it to be drawn in crayon? He might need that drawn in crayon. So please do. Crybabies (Whitehound & Gay Mafia Princess) always needs something to guide them since they cannot function independently. |

Whitehound
269
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:35:00 -
[361] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote:Then in perhaps a year we can revisit this. Until then, there is no reason to make an exception to a reasonably standard approach. You do not get to make these decisions just like Tippia does not get to make policies.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc Order of the Void
303
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:37:00 -
[362] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time.
Totally disregard next post. I am not scamming at all. People agree with me, some don't. I am not qq'ing he is.
The contract mechanic has not changed to my knowledge, so why should you be reimbursed? "The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB |

ShipToaster
156
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:38:00 -
[363] - Quote
There is some merit in this request. OP was less than clear about what needed to be said.
Before the change people who were serious about contract trading needed at least three hundred contract slots. Easiest way to get this was with four or five characters with corporation contracting to five or four. After the change you can get by with fifteen contracts total. This is a significant in game change.
You used corporation contracting to increase your ability to crate contracts for items that could only be traded on contracts but now this unique reason for having a large number of contract slots is gone you want the SP back so you can invest in market trading skills to make up for the change from mainly contracts to almost entirely market based trading on these items.
Perhaps a Q&A devblog style would be better since people are talking about :ccp: here? Lets try it.
Did they remove contracts? No but it lowered the number of contract slots you need by a lot so the in game change has caused a problem for players who trained this skill that new players to EVE will be able to avoid.
Did it make the need for you to have corporation contracting and even contracting trained at all? Yes. The change had a critically significant impact on the use of this skill as it was being used in game and now the only people who need this skill trained are those who actually do corporation ship replacement transfers and need those extra slots. Most people should be able to get by with contracting trained to rank one now.
Do contracting and corporation contracting skills need looked at by CCP to reflect their changed use and role in the new game? They do.
Did only scammers need this many contracts? The legitimate traders needed this many as well.
Is this the only skill that :ccp: are planning on making significant in game changes to? No. Wait until off grid booster becomes useless and then you will see ragepoasts. Begin |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc Order of the Void
303
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:42:00 -
[364] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:People don't complain because of people like yourself who immediately start to put them down and their ideas. You can't convince ignoramuses like yourself of anything because you already know it all.
Working properly is relative. Contracts were working just fine. The only reason this was changed was to allow for values to appear on killmails (sometime in the future). Killmails which are used for such worthless things in determining corp efficiency etc, which I would like to point out the mass whoring of mails that occurred during the burn Jita event. Killmaills are a worthless waste of time and effort.
I'll give you a +1 just becasue you used the word ignoramuses "The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6641
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:54:00 -
[365] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:First you say the OP does not have a problem, then you say it is her problem The OP does indeed not have a problem GÇö there is nothing for CCP to solve. What the OP sees as a problem is something the OP has created for himself and something he can solve for himself by stop thinking it's a problem.
I have not changed my stance. I am simply explaining where the OP's supposed (but not actual) problem is coming from: the OP himself.
Quote:One cannot train all skills and one needs to make choices, which skills to train and which to skip. GǪand at no point are you blocked from changing those choices and train something else. Now that the OP no longer wants to use a particular skill set (a choice that CCP has nothing to do with and which they will not reimburse him for because it's his choice), he can pick a different skill set and train that instead. Thus he solves the problem he believes he's having.
Quote:If a game change moves items from the contract market to the trade market GǪwhich hasn't happened.
Quote:If CCP cannot offer a better solution then, yes, they should reimburse the affected players their contracting skills and allow them to put the SPs into trading skills. They already offer all the solution that is needed: the OP can train new skills if he no longer wants to use the one he already has. Unless they make skills useless, they most definitely should not reimburse any SP, for the same reasons that they shouldn't reimburse ships that haven't been lost. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6641
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 23:59:00 -
[366] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:You do not get to make these decisions just like Tippia does not get to make policies. Good thing that I'm not doing that, then, but rather that I'm explaining the existing policies to you: nothing has been lost or removed, thus there is nothing to reimburse.
ShipToaster wrote:You used corporation contracting to increase your ability to crate contracts for items that could only be traded on contracts but now this unique reason for having a large number of contract slots is gone But here's the thing: that reason isn't gone. If you want to trade in items that can only be traded through contracts, you still need all those contacts slots. If you want to trade in items where you attract customers across region boundaries, you still need all those contract slots. If you want to trade in items that come in groups or packages, you still need all those contract slots. If you want toGǪ you knowGǪ simply trade using contracts, you still need all those contract slots. It's just the same as before. The only difference is that now he can also trade the items he has chosen as his speciality through the standard market as well, thus increasing his volume.
Quote:Did they remove contracts? No but it lowered the number of contract slots you need by a lot so the in game change has caused a problem for players who trained this skill that new players to EVE will be able to avoid. What problem is that?
Quote:Did it make the need for you to have corporation contracting and even contracting trained at all? Yes. The change had a critically significant impact on the use of this skill as it was being used in game and now the only people who need this skill trained are those who actually do corporation ship replacement transfers and need those extra slots. No. The skill can still be used in exactly the same way for exactly the same purposes as before. The use of the skill hasn't changed in the slightest.
Quote:Do contracting and corporation contracting skills need looked at by CCP to reflect their changed use and role in the new game? They do. Why? Their use and role haven't changed in the slightest.
More to the point: so what? Just because things change doesn't mean you get your SP reimbursed. It's part of the package. You train something, and it changes. When stuff is removed (and this is beyond your control), then there might be time for a reimbursement. This is the policy they abide by. Your own choices; your own mistakes; plain old dynamics in the development GÇö none of that is sufficient reason to get a reimbursement. Simply crying GÇ£I want!GÇ¥ most definitely does not qualify. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Whitehound
269
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 00:55:00 -
[367] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The OP does indeed not have a problem ... Sure does the OP have a problem, you are only being selfish and want to ignore it.
Being able to make new skill choices is not a solution, at least not for CCP, or we still would have the learning skills.
If you think the items are not moving from the contract market to the trade market then proof it.
Tippia wrote:Good thing that I'm not doing that ... No, it is bad of you to try. It is a good thing that you cannot do it.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Shian Yang
109
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 00:59:00 -
[368] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Shian Yang wrote:Then in perhaps a year we can revisit this. Until then, there is no reason to make an exception to a reasonably standard approach. You do not get to make these decisions just like Tippia does not get to make policies.
Dear capsuleer Whitehound,
Arguably no. Neither do you. All we are doing is pointing out to you that this is unlikely to happen because it is entirely unlike any previous case where there has been a skill point reimbursement.
You can keep on hoping the dog will turn into a fish, but to be honest, it is very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very unlikely to happen.
It might though. But as there is not even a problem I honestly cannot envisage of a situation in which CCP would reimburse a player for skill points simply because they want CCP to.
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
80
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 00:59:00 -
[369] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:The OP does indeed not have a problem ... Sure does the OP have a problem, you are only being selfish and want to ignore it. Being able to make new skill choices is not a solution, at least not for CCP, or we still would have the learning skills. If you think the items are not moving from the contract market to the trade market then proof it. Tippia wrote:Good thing that I'm not doing that ... No, it is bad of you to try. It is a good thing that you cannot do it.
And STILL you and your alt refuse to directly answer what remains a simple question. Perhaps you could offer actual evidence of the effect this change has had, then we might agree with you. You should also stop with your pathetic attempts at obfuscation, it only serves to make you look even more foolish than you already do.
|

Whitehound
269
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:05:00 -
[370] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:And STILL you and your alt refuse to directly answer what remains a simple question. Perhaps you could offer actual evidence of the effect this change has had, then we might agree with you. You should also stop with your pathetic attempts at obfuscation, it only serves to make you look even more foolish than you already do.
No. You will never agree with any of us. If you had doubts then you would not be posting so much crap here. I then gave three examples, you apparently missed them. Why should I care for what you want? You cannot find it yourself but need others to help you find it. You think your lazy ass opinion is good for anything? No. You are a joke. 
GTFO.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
80
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:23:00 -
[371] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:And STILL you and your alt refuse to directly answer what remains a simple question. Perhaps you could offer actual evidence of the effect this change has had, then we might agree with you. You should also stop with your pathetic attempts at obfuscation, it only serves to make you look even more foolish than you already do.
No. You will never agree with any of us. If you had doubts then you would not be posting so much crap here. I then gave three examples, you apparently missed them. Why should I care for what you want? You cannot find it yourself but need others to help you find it. You think your lazy ass opinion is good for anything? No. You are a joke.  GTFO.
Ok, so asking you and your alt for actual evidence as basis for your claim is now unreasonable? Is that what you say to everyone who you seek support from? What an odd way to go about things. Would the answer be the same to CCP if they asked you? Are you that stupid or arrogant?
And funnily I agree with pretty much everyone in this thread. It so happens that they are the ones telling you and your alt that you have no reason to expect a refund on skillpoints. It may have escaped your attention, but the policies created, enacted and adhered to by CCP cover eventualities such as these.
Those policies, which are freely available, and which several other posters have attempted to point out to you, make it clear that this "case" is not a case at all. It is merely you and your alt getting your panties in a bunch because of your failure to understand basic logic.
I should also point out that you are not a Dev, nor a GM, nor a member of the ISD and as such you have no right to tell me to GTFO of anywhere. 
Yet again you prove your inability to converse with people in a logical and polite fashion, thus proving your argument has no real substance and is in fact nothing more than a pathetic whine. Well done you. |

Serge Bastana
GWA Corp Unified Church of the Unobligated
468
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:35:00 -
[372] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Tippia wrote:The OP does indeed not have a problem ... Sure does the OP have a problem, you are only being selfish and want to ignore it. Being able to make new skill choices is not a solution, at least not for CCP, or we still would have the learning skills. If you think the items are not moving from the contract market to the trade market then proof it. Tippia wrote:Good thing that I'm not doing that ... No, it is bad of you to try. It is a good thing that you cannot do it.
First of all it's beyond ironic that you're calling anyone selfish here after defending this idea of sp reimbursement for this and second, the burden of proof is on the OP (whom, as has been pointed out, is most likely your alt) to show that the skills they say are now useless actually are.
Carry on slick. WoW holds your hand until end game, and gives you a cookie whether you win or lose. EVE not only takes your cookie, but laughs at you for bringing one in the first place... |

Whitehound
269
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 06:28:00 -
[373] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Ok, so asking you and your alt for actual evidence as basis for your claim is now unreasonable? Cry more.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
269
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 06:30:00 -
[374] - Quote
Serge Bastana wrote:First of all it's beyond ironic that you're calling anyone selfish here after defending this idea of sp reimbursement for this and second, the burden of proof is on the OP (whom, as has been pointed out, is most likely your alt) to show that the skills they say are now useless actually are.
Carry on slick. Keep bumping this thread, which you so hate. I am not as selfish as you are and I can still see what I am doing here. You could have let this topic die a long, long time ago. Yet your egos forbid this. This lets me take this thread beyond a thousand pages.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Kietay Ayari
Caldari State
425
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:12:00 -
[375] - Quote
The less able people are the more they will use their lack of ability to attempt to gain a moral high ground to use against everyone who is able to do what they are not. If you are unable to make use of the contract slots you have with the changes that have been made you do not deserve to benefit from them. If other people manage to do it, it is possible. The fact that you think it is harder, or even that it is harder, is irrelevant.
Achieving less is the opposite of what you need to do in order to have any right to claim anything from anyone. Ferox #1 |

Whitehound
271
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:27:00 -
[376] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:The less able people are the more they will use their lack of ability to attempt to gain a moral high ground to use against everyone who is able to do what they are not. If you are unable to make use of the contract slots you have with the changes that have been made you do not deserve to benefit from them. If other people manage to do it, it is possible. The fact that you think it is harder, or even that it is harder, is irrelevant.
Achieving less is the opposite of what you need to do in order to have any right to claim anything from anyone. No. It is a game change as many. If a change balances ships and brings them in line then the change only turns the game into what people expect the game to be. If you had trained for a Falcon while it was over-powered then you were really only exploiting an imbalance and after they fixed it is a Falcon still a useful ship.
If you have trained skills to be able to do something, like trading with certain items that can only be traded through contracts, then you did not exploit an imbalance. You did exactly what you were supposed to do and trained skills to enable you to do the things you want to do. When a change then eliminates the need for these skills do you begin to burn players' skill decisions. If you had asked how to trade these items prior to the change will everyone have told you to train contracting skills.
What makes this a controversy is that the change not only burns a few players, but it enables others to do more than before without having to train skills for it.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Kietay Ayari
Caldari State
427
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:32:00 -
[377] - Quote
The game will always change in ways like this. To not expect it is to lie to yourself. Every person who has played for a long time has felt like some skills they have trained were less useful than they were when they originally trained them because of a change.
If the change does not make the skills useless, then you have no argument. If you only used contracts for one specific thing, that is not an issue. Your lack of desire to use them to their full potential is not an argument for any kind of benefit to be given to you. You are not rewarded for achieving less. You should not be given a better chance at something else simply because you are unable to do something now. Ferox #1 |

Whitehound
271
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:38:00 -
[378] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:The game will always change in ways like this. To not expect it is to lie to yourself. No. You cannot base skill decisions on what might be in the future.
The change does make the contracting skills less useful for most and completely useless for some. If the skills had been made completely useless for all would CCP likely have reimbursed the SPs for all. Now they would need to reimburse them for only some players, which is a technical and organizational problem for CCP, because you just cannot simply do it for all but first have to find the players who need it done.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Kietay Ayari
Caldari State
429
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:44:00 -
[379] - Quote
How can any skill be useless for some? Do those some not have the same possibilities as all? What is it you are really saying? It is that its completely useless for those who want to use it properly in other ways. As I have said before already, the fact that you do not want to use it for anything else does not make it useless. If they changed the way mining lasers worked so you could no longer fit them to BSs, would they have to reimburse those skillpoints to miners who only trained the skill to have a safe ship to fly during Hulkageddon?
Your claim is the same as theirs. It is not one of rationality, it is a demand for something which has not been earned and has no reason to be given. Ferox #1 |

Whitehound
272
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:47:00 -
[380] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:How can any skill be useless for some? Ask a hardcore PvPer what he thinks of mining for example.
You simply cannot train all skills. You have to decide what to train for, what is useful to your game and what is not.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Kietay Ayari
Caldari State
429
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:51:00 -
[381] - Quote
You are still giving in to my point. Mining skills are not useless to a PvPer. That person can still use them just as well as anyone else can, they simply choose not to. Just because you do not want to use a skill in a way in which it is still effective does not mean there is a problem with the skill. There is a problem with something else. Ferox #1 |

Whitehound
272
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:57:00 -
[382] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:You are still giving in to my point. Mining skills are not useless to a PvPer. That person can still use them just as well as anyone else can, they simply choose not to. Just because you do not want to use a skill in a way in which it is still effective does not mean there is a problem with the skill. There is a problem with something else. No, I am not. Read again. Choices are essential to a game. Changing a game in ways that burns some of these choices (and when they were made for good reasons) is bad.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Kietay Ayari
Caldari State
429
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 08:02:00 -
[383] - Quote
That is what every change does. When they doubled the HP of every ship they ruined a lot of choices on how to play. They also created a lot of new ones.
A change may ruin the way you play but it opens up new ones. You can argue if these new ones are bad or if the old ones were good but it is irrelevant to the issue of whether or not the skill is useful and if people deserve to be refunded. The skill still has use. Ferox #1 |

Whitehound
272
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 08:10:00 -
[384] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:That is what every change does. When they doubled the HP of every ship they ruined a lot of choices on how to play. They also created a lot of new ones.
A change may ruin the way you play but it opens up new ones. You can argue if these new ones are bad or if the old ones were good but it is irrelevant to the issue of whether or not the skill is useful and if people deserve to be refunded. The skill still has use. No one says that you cannot burn players, but it is bad to do so and CCP has implemented a skill reimbursement system in the past to avoid it. There is a good chance that they will improve their system to allow for a selective reimbursement and because it will enable them to make further changes to the game without risking a loss of players.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Hel Schatgraver
Draconian Enforcers Available To Hire Dark Phoenix Rising.
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 08:35:00 -
[385] - Quote
This thread is lolz. 
To sum it up, Gay Army of PreRegal Dress-wearing Italians is whining because of one of two things: - Something CCP did. - Something CCP did.
EULA READING TIME! - http://community.eveonline.com/pnp/eula.asp
Quote:11. NO WARRANTIES
The Software, System, Game and all Game Content, and all other services and material provided in connection therewith, are provided "AS IS," with all faults, and without warranty of any kind. You assume all risk of use and all risk associated with accessing the System and playing the Game.
CCP disclaims all warranties, whether express or implied, including without limitation the warranties of merchantability, fitness for particular purpose and non-infringement. There is no warranty against interference with your enjoyment of the Game. CCP does not warrant that the operation of the System or your access to the System, or that your use of the Software, will be uninterrupted or error-free, nor that the System or Software will be compatible with your hardware and software.
While CCP attempts to have the System available at most times, CCP does not guarantee that the System will always be available, or that the System will not become unavailable during Game play. The System may become unavailable for a number of reasons, including without limitation during the performance of maintenance to the System, for the implementation of new software, for emergency situations and due to equipment or telecommunications failures.
And after that one sinks in, if you're still butthurt, direct your eyes to this one:
Quote:5. TERMINATION; SUSPENSION OF ACCOUNT . ... . C. By You . (1) Anytime
. You may terminate the EULA with regard to any or all of your Accounts at any time, upon notice to CCP via electronic mail. . You will not receive a refund of any fees in the event of such termination.
So instead of arguing over the validity of your moaning, or in Whitehound's case, the validity of someone else's moaning, think of it this way:
Even if EVE was a Democracy, your two opinions would have about as much weight as the USA's 'Justice Party' (look that **** up, it's also lolz)
tl;dr You have proven your opinion void. The only thing this thread is doing is repeating itself and trolling. It should be locked. Adapt or Quit. Stop this moaning.
SIDE NOTE: Why have so many QQ OPs and their ilk been using the word 'ignoramuses'? It's like 'their' word now, or something. Either that or they collectively discovered it.
btw, before you get on your 'I've been around for much longer than you" or "You're just a noob" high horse, you haven't, and I'm not. n++f sed.
And nice OP hijack Whitehound, anyone else notice that they haven't even posted on this page? |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 11:33:00 -
[386] - Quote
Hel Schatgraver wrote:And nice OP hijack Whitehound, anyone else notice that they haven't even posted on this page?
That would be because Whitehound couldn't be bothered constantly switching characters to post with his alt, Gay Mafia Princess.
|

Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
35
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 12:13:00 -
[387] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Darth Tickles wrote:a personalized apology from the CEO. we actually got one of those it just took ppl leaving the game... Which should teach ppl, if you want anything done, quit in droves
Actually, we also got one for a over-extended downtime too if I recall. Having said that, contracts are still a valid system. Besides, you still can't get any of the contract-only items through the market, now can you? |

ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers
117
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 12:35:00 -
[388] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time.
Totally disregard next post. I am not scamming at all. People agree with me, some don't. I am not qq'ing he is.
soooooo, what about contract mechanics has changed that you need this reimbursement? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4242
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 12:37:00 -
[389] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:without risking a loss of players.
frankly if they shed people like you who whine about every minute change that affects a skill they trained at any point in time the game is better off for it "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Serge Bastana
GWA Corp Unified Church of the Unobligated
470
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 12:46:00 -
[390] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Serge Bastana wrote:First of all it's beyond ironic that you're calling anyone selfish here after defending this idea of sp reimbursement for this and second, the burden of proof is on the OP (whom, as has been pointed out, is most likely your alt) to show that the skills they say are now useless actually are.
Carry on slick. Keep bumping this thread, which you so hate. I am not as selfish as you are and I can still see what I am doing here. You could have let this topic die a long, long time ago. Yet your egos forbid this. This lets me take this thread beyond a thousand pages.
You're the one who's keeping this alive by being so unwilling to accept that you have no grounds to claim back so called 'useless' sp. We're just enjoying watching you bluster with arguments that hold about as much water as a midget's belly button. This thread is serving as a great example of entitled whining.
You and the OP are the only one(s) who feel there is a case for reimbursement here, meanwhile, back on the ranch... WoW holds your hand until end game, and gives you a cookie whether you win or lose. EVE not only takes your cookie, but laughs at you for bringing one in the first place... |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
87
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 12:57:00 -
[391] - Quote
Serge Bastana wrote: hold about as much water as a midget's belly button.
Quoting because this actually made me laugh out loud.
|

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 13:15:00 -
[392] - Quote
i demand that ccp sets the op read only or ELSE IM GOING TO UNSUB
haha thatll show 'em |

Whitehound
272
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 14:10:00 -
[393] - Quote
Andski wrote:Whitehound wrote:without risking a loss of players. frankly if they shed people like you who whine about every minute change that affects a skill they trained at any point in time the game is better off for it I am educating, just like you Goons do.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Whitehound
272
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 14:12:00 -
[394] - Quote
Serge Bastana wrote:You're the one who's keeping this alive ... Sure, whatever your ego sees fit as the next counter argument is just right by me. You cannot stop and I am counting on it. 
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 20:47:00 -
[395] - Quote
ITTigerClawIK wrote:Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time.
Totally disregard next post. I am not scamming at all. People agree with me, some don't. I am not qq'ing he is. soooooo, what about contract mechanics has changed that you need this reimbursement? Nothing. He just can't scam as efficiently as he did before since modules do not need to be contracted anymore to sell. |

Whitehound
297
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 20:49:00 -
[396] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:Nothing. He just can't scam as efficiently as he did before since modules do not need to be contracted anymore to sell. The OP is a she. If you were referring to me then know that I use market orders and that I do not scam. If you do not believe it then prove me wrong.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
70
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 21:01:00 -
[397] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:Nothing. He just can't scam as efficiently as he did before since modules do not need to be contracted anymore to sell. The OP is a she. If you were referring to me then know that I use market orders and that I do not scam. If you do not believe it then prove me wrong. He/She/It.. Don't care. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
91
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 21:49:00 -
[398] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:Nothing. He just can't scam as efficiently as he did before since modules do not need to be contracted anymore to sell. The OP is a she. If you were referring to me then know that I use market orders and that I do not scam. If you do not believe it then prove me wrong.
OP should post with his main, unless of course it IS actually you. OP also suggested that people should check him/her/it out in the contracts pages, except he/she/it only shows up twice, and one of those courier contracts was a failure. So what gives? What super important, top secret hush hush stuff is your alt doing?
|

Whitehound
299
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 22:04:00 -
[399] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:OP should post with his main, unless of course it IS actually you. It still is not me. OP probably moved on some time ago and left the job of bouncing the No-sayers entirely to me. 
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
91
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 22:19:00 -
[400] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:OP should post with his main, unless of course it IS actually you. It still is not me. OP probably moved on some time ago and left the job of bouncing the No-sayers entirely to me. 
Ah I see, of course. Because that is the more rational explanation. Some random person, who has only ever appeared on two contracts, one of which was a failure, is complaining about mass contracting in a corp that contained only 7 people. Which they are no longer a member of.
You on the other hand up until the end of last year were a prolific user of the contract system for multiple identical courier contracts, among other things. Not saying you were a scammer or anything like that. But when the two of you are compared, the logical assumption is that you would be the more likely of the two to have cause for complaint.
Unless of course, the OP is your alt. As Sherlock said "when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"
|

TWHC Assistant
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 23:05:00 -
[401] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:As Sherlock said "when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth" Sherlock Holmes did however not use tinfoil hats to eliminate the impossible. |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
110
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 23:51:00 -
[402] - Quote
Gay Mafia Princess wrote:Since CCP now allows faction items on the market I want all the sp I have invested on all my toons to get corporate contracting to V refunded, absolute waste of time.
Totally disregard next post. I am not scamming at all. People agree with me, some don't. I am not qq'ing he is.
so if they refund your sp and then change their mindabout faction warfare only in 6 months...... you can spend all that time all over again. [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/OldST.jpg[/IMG] |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
91
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 00:45:00 -
[403] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:As Sherlock said "when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth" Sherlock Holmes did however not use tinfoil hats to eliminate the impossible.
Please provide proof of such Aluminium foil haberdashery.
|

TWHC Assistant
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 00:48:00 -
[404] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Please provide proof of such Aluminium foil haberdashery. Says the one wearing a tinfoil hat. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
91
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 00:50:00 -
[405] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Please provide proof of such Aluminium foil haberdashery. Says the one wearing a tinfoil hat.
Again, please provide proof of such. Unless you would prefer to admit that you are merely trolling, which is against the forum rules. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6667
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 00:59:00 -
[406] - Quote
Whitehound wrote:Sure does the OP have a problem Nope. The OP has made a choice not to use his skills GÇö he does not have a problem. His choices are not grounds for reimbursing SP he can still fully use.
Quote:Being able to make new skill choices is not a solution, at least not for CCP, or we still would have the learning skills. Making new skill choices most definitely is a solution, since those new skills will let the OP keep doing what he wants to do (which, of course, he already can GÇö new skills largely let him do it on an even larger scale than before). It also has nothing to do with learning skills: they were removed because they turned out to be a pointless meta-mechanic that only annoyed everyone and hurt newbies. When the mechanic (and the skills) were removed, we got the SP back. That is pretty much completely unlike what the OP is complaining about since nothing has been removed. The stuff is still being traded through contracts as people have proved on numerous occasions.
In fact, the burden of proof is on the OP, and he has provided exactly zero evidence that there is anything even remotely resembling a problem, so the proof to the contrary that was posted before that was just courtesy.
Quote:No, it is bad of you to try. Good thing I'm not doing that, then.
Quote:No. It is a game change as many. GǪand like many (in fact most) game changes, it doesn't remove anything from the game so there is no grounds for reimbursement. The skills can still be used exactly the same way they could be used before. A trader in the goods in question now have even more options available to him and can thus make more money than before.
Whitehound wrote:I am educating, just like you Goons do. But we all know you have no argument. No further education on this topic is needed. This has been known for many many years now. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

SlapNuts
Massive Dynamic weapons
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:10:00 -
[407] - Quote
refund it all, i would like to respec it all, would it not be nice to change my toon every time i got bored and needed a new direction.....sign me up  |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6667
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:14:00 -
[408] - Quote
SlapNuts wrote:refund it all, i would like to respec it all, would it not be nice to change my toon every time i got bored and needed a new direction.....sign me up  That's part of the reason why they won'tGǪ  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

TWHC Assistant
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:17:00 -
[409] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:TWHC Assistant wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Please provide proof of such Aluminium foil haberdashery. Says the one wearing a tinfoil hat. Again, please provide proof of such. Unless you would prefer to admit that you are merely trolling, which is against the forum rules. Why would I be trolling you when you are already trolling the thread? You are the one who does not care about the topic. If you lost your face then nobody would care about it. Yet, this will seem like an insult to you. Who can help you there? |

Dark EvE1
renditions of madness B A C K B 0 N E
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:17:00 -
[410] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvM7av1o1Q Gaming site for the lastest reviews and news-áhttp://www.gamers-relic.co.uk/
Gaming magazine:-áhttp://www.magcloud.com/browse/issue/364936 |

TWHC Assistant
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:24:00 -
[411] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Nope. The OP has made a choice not to use his skills GÇö he does not have a problem. His choices are not grounds for reimbursing SP he can still fully use. The OP had no choice, but was forced to give up or to train new skills. It remains a problem.
Tippai wrote:Making new skill choices most definitely is a solution Read again, it was not a solution for the learning skills. You are only derailing and dodging and then claim there were no arguments.
Tippia wrote:But we all know you have no argument. No, you have no argument. All arguments have been made a long time ago. You refuse to see them, but do not say there are none. You have been given them. |

TWHC Assistant
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:26:00 -
[412] - Quote
Dark EvE1 wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvM7av1o1Q A terrible band with a terrible name. Why are they not in the top charts? I wonder. Could it simply be fail?  |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
91
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:31:00 -
[413] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:TWHC Assistant wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Please provide proof of such Aluminium foil haberdashery. Says the one wearing a tinfoil hat. Again, please provide proof of such. Unless you would prefer to admit that you are merely trolling, which is against the forum rules. Why would I be trolling you when you are already trolling the thread? You are the one who does not care about the topic. If you lost your face then nobody would care about it. Yet, this will seem like an insult to you. Who can help you there?
Are you just rolling your face across your keyboard, because honestly, you are making no sense. I have read this thread, taken in to account all available information and then formulated an opinion. After doing that I posted MY opinions based on all the known facts. When those facts were lacking, I and others asked for clarification, which was irrationally denied. Perhaps you might want to consider re-reading this entire thread, getting a good nights sleep, and then go do something else.
|

TWHC Assistant
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:47:00 -
[414] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Are you just rolling your face across your keyboard, because honestly, you are making no sense. You are the one who is trolling others. You purposely ignore the problem and say there is none. You do not want to accept it as a problem. You are unable to. You deny yourself the chance to see it from the OP's point of view for selfish reasons. The reason why you do this is likely because you fear losing your face when you develop an understanding for another player's problem. Put aside all you know and do take the OP's stance. See it from her side. Then we can discuss it. Until then are you only a nobody to me who gives free bumps to a thread. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
91
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:49:00 -
[415] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Are you just rolling your face across your keyboard, because honestly, you are making no sense. You are the one who is trolling others. You purposely ignore the problem and say there is none. You do not want to accept it as a problem. You are unable to. You deny yourself the chance to see it from the OP's point of view for selfish reasons. The reason why you do this is likely because you fear losing your face when you develop an understanding for another player's problem. Put aside all you know and do take the OP's stance. See it from her side. Then we can discuss it. Until then are you only a nobody to me who gives free bumps to a thread.
Right, so clearly you haven't read anything that anyone else in this thread has said, least of all me and are just trolling. That's fine, it's good that you can admit that, even indirectly. |

TWHC Assistant
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:51:00 -
[416] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Right, so clearly you haven't read anything that anyone else in this thread has said, least of all me and are just trolling. That's fine, it's good that you can admit that, even indirectly. Say "Hello" to my alt. I have been reading the thread from the first page on. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
91
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:57:00 -
[417] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:Right, so clearly you haven't read anything that anyone else in this thread has said, least of all me and are just trolling. That's fine, it's good that you can admit that, even indirectly. Say "Hello" to my alt. I have been reading the thread from the first page on.
Awww Whitehound, so this is your other alt! What happened, did your main get banned from posting already? |

TWHC Assistant
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 02:03:00 -
[418] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Awww Whitehound, so this is your other alt! What happened, did your main get banned from posting already? What happened to the topic? Is it not of interest to you any longer? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6671
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 04:15:00 -
[419] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:The OP had no choice Yes he had. The skills work exactly the same way as before and as shown, the market still exists for a number of reasons. All that has happened is that a new market for the same goods has opened up, and the OP can choose to make use of this market as well.
He chooses to make it a problem; he can choose not to make it one. The game hasn't changed to make the skills useless. Thus there is no grounds for a refund.
Quote:Read again, it was not a solution for the learning skills. Read it again, choosing new skills is a solution because you can always do it if you no longer want to use the skills you already have. When they removed learning skills, it would have been silly to make a new choice because the functionality was gone GÇö what's the point of having an alternative to something that doesn't exist?. That's the reason we got SP instead: because the skills lost all use and function. That is not the case here, so there is no grounds for a refund.
Quote:No, you have no argument. All arguments have been made a long time ago. Yes, I made all my arguments a long time ago. So far, you haven't been able to respond to any of them.
GǪsuch as the fact that the skills work exactly the same. GǪsuch as the fact that they don't refund things that haven't been lost. GǪsuch as the fact that if the OP wants to keep using his skills, he can. GǪsuch as the fact that if the OP wants to keep trading in the goods he's used to, he can. GǪsuch as the fact that the GÇ£problemGÇ¥ only exists because the OP has chosen to make it exist GÇö he can choose to make it go away as well.
So why on earth should he get any of his SP back?
Quote:What happened to the topic? Is it not of interest to you any longer? Sure, but you refuse to discuss it. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Hel Schatgraver
Draconian Enforcers Available To Hire Dark Phoenix Rising.
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 05:53:00 -
[420] - Quote
Bam. Since you are all blind.
Except for Cutter. Cutter gets a cookie. A TRACKING cookie. |

TWHC Assistant
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 07:25:00 -
[421] - Quote
Tippia wrote:TWHC Assistant wrote:The OP had no choice Yes he had. No. It is an MMO. You do not play alone. When items are moved from contracts to the trade market and players stop trading them on the contract market do you have no other choice but to move with it.
Tippia wrote:Read it again, choosing new skills is a solution because you can always do it if you no longer want to use the skills you already have. Again, it was not a solution for the learning skills. You should really accept this. We all did accept it a long time ago.
Tippia wrote:Yes, I made all my arguments a long time ago. So far, you haven't been able to respond to any of them.
GǪsuch as the fact that the skills work exactly the same. GǪsuch as the fact that they don't refund things that haven't been lost. GǪsuch as the fact that if the OP wants to keep using his skills, he can. GǪsuch as the fact that if the OP wants to keep trading in the goods he's used to, he can. GǪsuch as the fact that the GÇ£problemGÇ¥ only exists because the OP has chosen to make it exist GÇö he can choose to make it go away as well. These are not arguments. You are trying to understand the OP's problem by looking at what CCP has so far solved. However, what CCP recognizes as a problem and what they can solve is not the same. Only because they did not solve a problem does not mean it does exist. It only means it stays a problem.
You are not able to see the OP's problem. It does not automatically mean the same as the OP not having a problem. It only means you are blind to it. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6680
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 07:36:00 -
[422] - Quote
Yes he had. He could choose to keep using the skills (since they still work exactly the same). He chose not to. He could choose to expand his tradecraft to include the new markets. He chose not to. He could choose to find new uses for his skills. He chose not to. He has an absolute crapton of choice, and he chooses not to use any of them and instead wants to have skills refunded that still work exactly the same way they did before.
Quote:When items are moved from contracts to the trade market and players stop trading them on the contract market do you have no other choice but to move with it. Good thing that this didn't happen, thenGǪ and even if it did, he's still the one choosing what to do with his skills. They have not become useless GÇö he has chosen not to use them. Unless they become useless, there's no reason to refund them.
Quote:Again, it was not a solution for the learning skills. GǪbecause the functionality was removed, which means you can stop bringing them up because they're not a relevant point of comparison. Again, contracts are still around; they work exactly the same way they did before; the skills do exactly the same things they did before; nothing has changed or been removed. This means there is no reason to refund the OP's contracting SP.
Quote:These are not arguments. Yes they are. You are just unable to respond to them because they are all quite difficult to deny, and agreeing with them leads to the conclusion that there is no reason for the OP to get his SP refunded. As for what CCP recognises as a problem, they recognised that commonly used modules not being on the common market was a problem, so they fixed it. In doing so, they didn't break, remove, adjust or change contracts in any way, leaving the contracting skills completely untouched. As a result, there is no reason to refund the OP's SP in contracting skills.
Quote:You are not able to see the OP's problem. Sure I am. That's why I see that it's only a GÇ£problemGÇ¥ because he chooses to make it one. If he chooses not to, it ceases to be a problem. His decision to make it one doesn't mean CCP has to fix anything because the GÇ£problemGÇ¥ is not of their doing. He made it; he can fix it; and there is no reason for CCP to refund his SP. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

TWHC Assistant
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 07:44:00 -
[423] - Quote
Playing alone in an MMO is a choice? Please be serious.
Tippia wrote:Good thing that this didn't happen, thenGǪ I picked three items at random and showed you that it is happening.
Tippia wrote:GǪbecause the functionality was removed Thank you.
Tippia wrote:Yes they are. No, you are still trying to see the problem and have not found it yet. How can anything be an argument when you do not understand the problem?
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6681
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 07:56:00 -
[424] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:Playing alone in an MMO is a choice? Please be serious. Please don't change the question after it has been answered. Yes, he had a choice. He could choose to keep using the skills (since they still work exactly the same). He chose not to. He could choose to expand his tradecraft to include the new markets. He chose not to. He could choose to find new uses for his skills. He chose not to. He has an absolute crapton of choice, and he chooses not to use any of them and instead wants to have skills refunded that still work exactly the same way they did before.
Quote:I picked three items at random and showed you that it is happening. GǪand others proved you wrong. Not that it matters, because, as mentioned above, the OP still has plenty of choice in how to use his skills. If he chooses to waste them, then that's his choice and his self-created problem that no-one can solve but him. It certainly isn't a reason to give him an SP refund for skills that still works exactly the same as before and which he can still use.
So you agree, then, that it's irrelevant to the topic at hand other than to show that the OP doesn't have a case for having his SP refunded. So why do you keep bringing it up?
Yes they are. You are just unable to respond to them because they are all quite difficult to deny, and agreeing with them leads to the conclusion that there is no reason for the OP to get his SP refunded. As for what CCP recognises as a problem, they recognised that commonly used modules not being on the common market was a problem, so they fixed it. In doing so, they didn't break, remove, adjust or change contracts in any way, leaving the contracting skills completely untouched. As a result, there is no reason to refund the OP's SP in contracting skills.
Quote:you are still trying to see the problem GǪexcept of course that I can see it very clearly. That's why I see that it's only a GÇ£problemGÇ¥ because he chooses to make it one. If he chooses not to, it ceases to be a problem. His decision to make it one doesn't mean CCP has to fix anything because the GÇ£problemGÇ¥ is not of their doing. He made it; he can fix it; and there is no reason for CCP to refund his SP. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

TWHC Assistant
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:02:00 -
[425] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Please don't change the question after it has been answered. It is not a choice.
Tippia wrote:GǪand others proved you wrong. No.
Tippia wrote:So you agree, then, that it's irrelevant to the topic ... No. It is important so that you see that training simply another skill is not a solution when the problem is about the time someone spends with skill training.
Tippia wrote:Yes they are. No.
Tippia wrote:GǪexcept of course that I can see it very clearly. Thank you.
We are done here. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6681
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:11:00 -
[426] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:I have no argument We know. It is readily apparent from your inability to respond to what other people write. You addressed none of my points. You refuted nothing. You provided zero argumentation, fact, reasoning, proof, or other crucial elements. You just keep saying no and hoping that reality will change.
The fact of the matter remains the same: there is no problem. The OP chose his path. The OP created his own issues. The OP, not CCP, can make those issues go away. CCP does not refund something that hasn't been lost. The OP has no reason to get any of his SP back.
Quote:Tippia wrote:So you agree, then, that it's irrelevant to the topic ... Yes. Good. You see, training another skill is a very common solution to changes in EVE, should that change result in you no longer wanting to do what you did before. Your choices and your wishes are pretty much irrelevant as long as the mechanics aren't outright removed. In this case, nothing changed, so there is no reason for the OP to get his SP refunded. He has a world of solutions available to him if he so chooses, and simply doing contract trading just like before is one of them.
So you finally understand why the OP has no problem and why there is no reason for him to get any of his SP refunded.
If you finally understood this simple fact that has been presented from page one, then yes, we are indeed done here. Thank you for finally realising that the OP has no case for a refund because he hasn't lost anything.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

TWHC Assistant
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:18:00 -
[427] - Quote
Tippia wrote:If you finally understood this simple fact that has been presented from page one, then yes, we are indeed done here. Thank you for finally realising that the OP has no case for a refund because he hasn't lost anything. No. I am only interested in you agreeing with the OP having a problem. I do understand that you have a different and very selfish opinion on how to solve problems. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6681
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:21:00 -
[428] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:No. I am only interested in you agreeing with the OP having a problem. Why would I agree with something that is false? Just because the OP chose not to make use of his skills doesn't mean there is a problem or that he should have his SP refunded.
The OP can make a different choice, and the woes he has created for himself will evaporate before his eyes. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Shian Yang
114
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:22:00 -
[429] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:Tippia wrote:If you finally understood this simple fact that has been presented from page one, then yes, we are indeed done here. Thank you for finally realising that the OP has no case for a refund because he hasn't lost anything. No. I am only interested in you agreeing with the OP having a problem. I do understand that you have a different and very selfish opinion on how to solve problems.
Greetings capsuleer Whitehound,
It may be that you and capsuleer Tippia simply have a different opinion on what a problem is. In capsuleer Tippia's case it agrees with what CCP normally defines as a skill related problem. In your case, well. It seems to be based around what an individual player wants.
Not the best basis for making fair and honest decisions; but I can see why you push that agenda so hard.
Regards,
Shian Yang |

Sobach
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
31
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:24:00 -
[430] - Quote
I think the real question here is...
...how in the fk did this trollbait of a thread gets all the way to 22 pages? |

TWHC Assistant
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:30:00 -
[431] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Why would I agree with something that is false? You are not being asked to agree any longer for obvious reasons. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6681
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:35:00 -
[432] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:You are not being asked to agree any longer for obvious reasons. So you agree, then that just because the OP chose not to make use of his skills doesn't mean there is a problem or that he should have his SP refunded.
Goodie. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

TWHC Assistant
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:40:00 -
[433] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote:Not the best basis for making fair and honest decisions; but I can see why you push that agenda so hard. I am not CCP, so why should I take their stance or side with them regarding player problems? It makes no sense. I am the player. I am the one who wants to play this game. |

TWHC Assistant
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:40:00 -
[434] - Quote
Tippia wrote:So you agree, then that just because the OP chose not to make use of his skills doesn't mean there is a problem or that he should have his SP refunded.
Goodie. No. And stop trolling. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6681
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:46:00 -
[435] - Quote
Then we're not done here.
Quote:I am not CCP, so why should I take their stance or side with them regarding player problems? Because most player problems are complete nonsense GÇö they're just something the player in question made up out of a mix of entitlement and ignorance. Like the OP's GÇ£problemGÇ¥, which wouldn't exist if the OP hadn't chosen to create it.
You should take CCP's stance because it means their policies are applied equally and reasonably, rather than to assuage the random unfounded wants of some silly whiner who can't accept his own decisions.
Quote:I will stop trolling. Unlikely.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

TWHC Assistant
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:54:00 -
[436] - Quote
Reported for trolling. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6681
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 09:05:00 -
[437] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:Reported for trolling. Indeed you are.
The simple fact remains: there is no reason to give the OP a refund on his SP because the skills haven't changed in the slightest.
No matter how much you troll, you cannot deny this fact.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

TWHC Assistant
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 10:01:00 -
[438] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The simple fact remains: there is no reason to give the OP a refund on his SP because the skills haven't changed in the slightest.
No matter how much you troll, you cannot deny this fact.
No. I am not denying that the skills have not changed. I only do not agree with you that one should not reimburse skills when the game changes in other places and in unforeseeable ways.
Why do you believe one should only reimburse SPs when skills change? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6685
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 10:08:00 -
[439] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:I only do not agree with you that one should not reimburse skills when the game changes in other places and in unforeseeable ways. You agreed to this when you signed up.
Quote:Why do you believe one should only reimburse SPs when skills change? You shouldn't even get it when skills are changed GÇö just when they are removed. This is in keeping with the reimbursement policy. We weren't given a pile of minerals when our Gurista ships were changed from being turret ships into being missile/drone ships, because we still had those ships, they still worked, and we could stil fly themGǪ If we lose a ship due to server crashes or because they just drop the ship from the database, then we're closing in on having sufficient cause for getting a refund.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |

Valkerias
Society of Friends
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 10:27:00 -
[440] - Quote
Sobach wrote:I think the real question here is...
...how in the fk did this trollbait of a thread gets all the way to 22 pages?
To answer your question,
Whitehound wrote: I'm right, you're not because I say so, so shut up!
And
TWHC Assistant wrote: No! REALLY, in the universe I live, which only exists in my head, I AM right! The rest of you are just trolling fools who should just give up, worship my ego and give the OP his/her/it SP back because the OP doesn't WANT to use his skills any more.
Over and over again.
|

TWHC Assistant
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 10:41:00 -
[441] - Quote
Tippia wrote:You agreed to this when you signed up. No. I agreed to the terms of use. We are free to discuss our problems and opinions here on the forum within the rules of the forum.
Tippia wrote:You shouldn't even get it when skills are changed GÇö just when they are removed. This is in keeping with the reimbursement policy. We weren't given a pile of minerals when our Gurista ships were changed from being turret ships into being missile/drone ships, because we still had those ships, they still worked, and we could stil fly themGǪ Do you think this was right? |

Niko Takahashi
United Starbase Systems
38
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 10:42:00 -
[442] - Quote
A far I know CCP did refund the sp only in cases when they have changed the skill. Example would be the connections skill set adjustment when they removed agent quality for missions.
This is not the case and the skill in question still give the benefit as in description. In this situation I do not think the op can expect any refund.
Although there is a valid point there and that is that the contract system is now useless for item trading.
Only thing you can use it for is to sell rigged ships and courier contracts. I mean functionality is there but people are not going to use it. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
2335

|
Posted - 2012.05.13 11:22:00 -
[443] - Quote
This thread is not going places. I'm locking it for us all. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: [one page] |