| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
|
CCP Phantom
C C P
C C P Alliance
1272
   |
Posted - 2012.05.09 16:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
Inferno is burning its way towards Tranquility and with Inferno our Factional Warfare received a massive load of dev love!
New interfaces, improved game mechanics, more meaningful actions, new tools for better group efforts ... all this and more will be implemented. Dive into the details which are all available in this devblog by CCP Ytterbium from Team Game of Drones.
CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|
Elsa Nietchize
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
20
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
first |
Pandorium9
Pandorium Prime
The CodeX Alliance
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
The "Comments" link is to the wrong page.
EDIT: it works now |
Astoreni
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Woot!? |
Capri Sern
The Stand Alone Complex
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Liking most of the changes. Might even give FW a go now. Not sure Datacore farming represents much of a passive income tbh. It's like putting -ú1 into a savings account when you're 12 so you can buy a zimmerframe when you hit 70.
Edit: Grammer  |
Nevigrofnu Mrots
Heroes of the Past
Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
 |
BolsterBomb
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
45
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
Is current Sov held staying the same or being reset, sounds like it is staying the same?
Lt. Colonel
of The Caldari State
Traitor and Ex Luminaire General
of The Gallente Federation |
Destru Kaneda
CTRL-Q
Iron Oxide.
48
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
Looks ******* awesome, can't wait.
http://minmatar.eve-kill.net/
http://binaerpilot.no/
GMU d-(---)pu s+++:-- a-- C++++$ U>+++ P+ L+ E---- W+++$ w PS+++ PE-- Y++ PGP-- t+ tv-- b+ D++ G e- h r++ y+* |
T'san Manaan
Murientor Tribe
Defiant Legacy
23
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
Changes look good so far can't wait to see it go live.
Just some thoughts I would like to see implemented in the future.
1. Missions go to the nearest "Contested" system to keep the mission farmers in the combat zone.
2. Benefits to P.I. and industry (I.E. faster manufacturing) for upgrading systems
3. captured stations use current Sov holder Agents.
4. station lockouts to include anyone with a negative faction standing or outlaw status.
Other than that I like everything I see so far especially the no docking for your enemies |
Ashina Sito
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:24:00 -
[10] - Quote
I would have thought there would be more responses by now. Some of the changes sound good, others have swaths of the player base up in arms.
Gotta log on the Jita alt and see what has happened to the datacore specualtion |
|
|
|
CCP Ytterbium
C C P
C C P Alliance
549
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:26:00 -
[11] - Quote
BolsterBomb wrote:Is current Sov held staying the same or being reset, sounds like it is staying the same?
We won't reset anything. Occupancy will be directly translated into Sovereignty in FW systems. |
|
Eric Deloitte
The Flowing Penguins
Iron Oxide.
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:27:00 -
[12] - Quote
As the new FW is doing away with Occupancy and using sovereigty so this 'Sovereignty Reset' may mean:
1) Sovereignty may be 'Reset' to what the current occupancy is on patch day
2) Sovereignty may remain as it is with Occupancy simply being removed
3) Sovereignty & Occupancy may simply be removed making systems effectivley neutral with us having to fight over them again to 'set' sovereignty, but nobody being locked out from the start.
Could we have some clarification as to what will happen? |
Caecilia Arene
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:30:00 -
[13] - Quote
Nice! Even considering giving it a go! |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
2320
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:33:00 -
[14] - Quote
We've come a long way from "the devs will never touch FW again!"
Thanks Team Game of Drones, for all your hard work. Looking forward to all the paid pew pew May 22!
Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
|
ZenithDK
Danish Space Pioneers
Frontier Trading and Co Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:34:00 -
[15] - Quote
This looks pretty awesome!
Have been thinking about getting into FW for a long time, but I didn't see much point in it - with 2 characters doing datacore mining, there will suddenly be a big interest in it for me.
One thing though:
Doesn't this sort of encourage that you take sov, buy all your data cores - loose sov, watch prices spike, and then you dump your cheaply acquired stash?
If a sufficiently large corp in FW can be deciding factor/work together with others, what's to prevent this? |
Mike deVoid
Doctrine.
FEARLESS.
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:36:00 -
[16] - Quote
I mentioned this at Fanfest as a question and CCP Soniclover seemed to take this on board for consideration, but please please please implement from the start diminishing returns for the LP store cost reductions. I notice you have mentioned this in the blog, but I think it's really important that when coming from an extreme that the first win is the biggest slice and that the last win gives the smallest.
I think this rewards the guys fighting from zero the most - and who deserve it! On the other hand, moving from 80% to 100% of systems should give you the smallest reward since you are already steamrolling the opposition. |
Caiman Graystock
EVE University
Ivy League
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:36:00 -
[17] - Quote
Does this mean that if the caldari militia gain sovereignty over a system that was previously gallente, for instance, that system actually falls under the complete sovereignty of the Caldari State, and becomes Caldari Space whilst it is held? |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
942
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:41:00 -
[18] - Quote
I need new pants.
Great changes, guys! I'd love to see more things influenced by system upgrades in the future, like for example how easy it is to capture a system (VP payout), or other changes to encourage actual fighting, like the missions being redone to be a bit easier, but to be able to be closed by the opposing militia (like complexes).
Still, this is an amazing start, and I can't wait to see where FW goes from here.
Rifterlings - Small gang lowsec combat corp specializing in frigates and cruisers (all races, not just Rifters!). US Timezone veterans and newbies alike are welcome to join. Come chat in the "we fly rifters" in-game channel. Free fitted frigates for members! |
Kaylen Khurelem
24th Imperial Crusade
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:41:00 -
[19] - Quote
ZenithDK wrote:This looks pretty awesome!
Have been thinking about getting into FW for a long time, but I didn't see much point in it - with 2 characters doing datacore mining, there will suddenly be a big interest in it for me.
One thing though:
Doesn't this sort of encourage that you take sov, buy all your data cores - lose sov, watch prices spike, and then you dump your cheaply acquired stash?
If a sufficiently large corp in FW can be deciding factor/work together with others, what's to prevent this?
Taking Sov, when you're low on Sov, is harder. So you'd have to work hard at getting it back. As such, it seems fairly balanced. It's only unbalanced if you get people on the other side to do the same thing. |
Mashie Saldana
Veto.
Veto Corp
504
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:42:00 -
[20] - Quote
Did someone nuke the blog, it is showing as an empty page here?
Edit - It is visible again.
Dominique Vasilkovsky
Mashie Saldana
Monica Foulkes |
|
|
Mike deVoid
Doctrine.
FEARLESS.
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:42:00 -
[21] - Quote
I have 2 more questions:
1/ No planned changes to Faction Navy in highsec? Did you look at changes here and drop them, or did you just feel there was no compelling reason to make adjustments here?
2/ Will you consider allowing corps/alliances to swap sides in the war? What if I want to play FW on hardmode and continually join the losing side as the war shifts or join an FW militia essentially as a mercenary hire? |
Zarnak Wulf
CTRL-Q
Iron Oxide.
335
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:43:00 -
[22] - Quote
I like the datacores and the shifting LP prices. As one side wins their stuff will become dirt cheap. Those in it for a profit will get bored as a faction's items swamp the market. The losing side will hopefully gain followers as their items become very expensive and coveted on the market. It will hopefully self regulate.
I would like to see new items in addition to the datacores added to the LP stores. And is there any time frame or even belief that the faction Osprey, Scythe, Exequror, and Augoror could be looked at? They really are quite horrible. |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
942
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:44:00 -
[23] - Quote
ZenithDK wrote:This looks pretty awesome!
Have been thinking about getting into FW for a long time, but I didn't see much point in it - with 2 characters doing datacore mining, there will suddenly be a big interest in it for me.
One thing though:
Doesn't this sort of encourage that you take sov, buy all your data cores - loose sov, watch prices spike, and then you dump your cheaply acquired stash?
If a sufficiently large corp in FW can be deciding factor/work together with others, what's to prevent this?
Aaaaand we have our first metagaming idea for the new FW system: datacore cartel!
Rifterlings - Small gang lowsec combat corp specializing in frigates and cruisers (all races, not just Rifters!). US Timezone veterans and newbies alike are welcome to join. Come chat in the "we fly rifters" in-game channel. Free fitted frigates for members! |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration
Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
728
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:44:00 -
[24] - Quote
Excellent changes. There will be a lot of knock-on effects even outside of FW. This is really great CCP. Nice work!
|
Rhaile Vhindiscar
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:45:00 -
[25] - Quote
"You want to do research, fine? The best way is to go kill people." I can see how that would play out to a potential scientist. So, are you really telling industrialist to join fw or just creating an interdependence without any real justification?
Overhaul datacore mining some other way. Get datacores out of FW. It doesn't make sense fluff wise or mechanic wise. You just got done telling people you're not going to let them shoot npcs to build things (drone nerf)...then you tell them you are going to make them shoot npcs to build things (fw overhaul). All you did was change the position in the production chain.
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation
Black Thorne Alliance
720
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:45:00 -
[26] - Quote
But i'm not in FW   |
Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin
262
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:46:00 -
[27] - Quote
wonderful so all the systems the minnies have been steamrolling for the past week will stay they way till the new changes make it take 5x as long.
that makes sense thanks. /sarcasm/
http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg |
Clodim
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:46:00 -
[28] - Quote
So basically nothing changed with CCP, you have an idea, and you will enforce it no matter what players think. One might think you've learned from last year... |
Ancy Denaries
Frontier Venture
139
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:51:00 -
[29] - Quote
I like how there's two pages of awesome praise, then two whineposts at the very end. Mission accomplished, I presume.
"Shoot at anything that moves. If it doesn't move, shoot it anyway, it might move later."
"Do not be too positive. The light at the end of the tunnel could be a train." - Franz Kafka |
Nanshara
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 17:52:00 -
[30] - Quote
Clodim wrote:So basically nothing changed with CCP, you have an idea, and you will enforce it no matter what players think. One might think you've learned from last year...
Do you even read the Dev Blogs - This is all subject to change. reading the thread your the first negative comment so guess you better HTFU |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |